Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The following pages shows a request that was made for a Judicial Review in order to investigate these crimes.
The statements of the following individuals are considered here :: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Krishnan Venkatakrishnan (Ryerson University) Cathy Faye (Ryerson University) Hicks Morley Human Resources Lawyer - Elizabeth Kosmidis HRTO Judge - Judith Allen Dean Maurice Yeates (Ryerson University)
1
Request for a Judicial Review From the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (HRTO) Case # : 2009-04265-I
17th May 2012 Dear Hon. Madam /Sir ; This is a request for a judicial review. It includes details of how perjury and political manoeuvring was used at a previous HRTO hearing. The hearing was held in August 2011. It was to seek justice for the discrimination and illegitimate firing of Sid Senadheera from Ryerson University due to bipolar illness. This application for judicial review is prepared and filed by Sid Senadheera. He will represent himself in legal matters since he cannot afford a Lawyer. The applicant has no other income other than ODSP (disability). Sid Senadheera's Supervisor Professor Krishnan Venkatakrishnan denied the request by the Ryerson University Physician for reasonable accommodation for bipolar illness, violating the Canadian Disability Act. Instead of accommodation he decided to fire him because of the fear and stigma of the bipolar illness. His decisions were approved by the Ryerson University Dean Maurice Yeates. Perjury was used to cover up obvious violations in the Canadian disability act. Firing took place under discrimination and highly arbitrary conditions in the Fall of 2009. A false arrest and interrogation by the Toronto police was also made in 2009 under fragmented arguments by the Respondents. A judicial review is required to inquire why there was fixing of the outcome during the HRTO hearing by the Arbitrator. Before going to the hearing several Lawyers told me, I wont get anything out of it unless I had strong political ties. The Respondents Lawyer, Elizabeth Kosmidis of Hicks Morley LLP, took a stand to support corruption and perjury of the respondents while under oath. Meanwhile the HRTO Adjudicator Judith Allen did not object to this situation or correcting it while she knew some of the facts from witnesses had internal contradictions (please read the details in the evidence). When I inquired about this situation from the HRTO Registrar Jus. Richard Hennessey he requested that I send the attached information to the Superior Court of Justice for a judicial review. His email response is attached with this application. All evidence attached to this application were previously presented before to the HRTO court. Thank you. Yours Sincerely,
Sid Senadheera
On the morning of 27th Oct 2009 at 10.00 am Sid Senadheera received the following email. [full email will be provided to court]
email correspondence circulated between Sid Senadheera, K. Venkatakrishnan and Maurice Yeates (below) and Cathy Faye. The police officers that arrested Sid Senadheera for questioning in the evening on the same day under a false testimony given by Maurice Yeates and K. Venkatakrishnan to be dealt separately, mentioned to him that he has been fired from Ryerson. That was on October 27th. The above email also mentions I told Ms. Cathy Faye to pass you the message that I am sick. She knew exactly what the sickness was. The Police officers were told about Sid Senadheera's sickness at Ryerson. The police officers that arrested Sid also knew he had bipolar illness and asked him if he needs to see a Doctor (on 27th Oct 2009). They found out this information from Maurice Yeates and K. Venkatakrishnan according to the Crown's disclosure. Ms. Cathy Faye knew Sid Senadheera had bipolar illness before the firing, and so did Maurice Yeates, K. Venkatakrishnan and Bo Tan. This fabricated evidence was put forth to the Court by Lawyer Elizabeth Kosmidis. Ms. Cathy Faye gave an internally inconsistent statement while knowingly lying under oath. Therefore she is an alleged criminal for perjury. Her arguments such as not knowing about bipolar illness before the firing or having not written Waterloo Astrophysics program in the application to Ryerson were merely to divert the court's attention from the serious violations.
When asked about this contradiction at the trial, both Imrie Juuralink and Cathy Faye fabricated the truth. This was their answer Bipolar illness was not discussed in this particular meeting, it was discussed in another meeting. According to her previous testimony unless that other meeting was in December after the firing letter has been mailed she has an internal contradiction in the statement made under oath. She contradicts already with the evidence given about the other meeting by the police evidence and the disclosure again as well. Another big controversy here is that, Cathy Faye and Imrie Juuralink implies they did not know about Sid Senadheera's Bipolar illness even while there were fire drills going on to evacuate buildings in case Sid showed up at Ryerson (written in the Toronto police disclosure). This was happening in October of 2009. It is impossible how this school has kept Cathy Faye in the dark, who is a key figure that decided Sid's fate at Ryerson, while fourteen story buildings were evacuated as emergency precautions by the University police.
10
APPENDIX A
11
APPENDIX B
12