Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
GENERAL UNIQUENESS...............................................................................................7
Uniqueness – NG Demand Increasing......................................................................................................................................8
Uniqueness – NG Demand Increasing......................................................................................................................................9
Uniqueness – NG Demand Increasing....................................................................................................................................10
Uniqueness – NG Demand Increasing....................................................................................................................................11
Uniqueness – NG Demand Increasing....................................................................................................................................12
Uniqueness – NG Demand Increasing....................................................................................................................................13
Uniqueness – NG Prices High.................................................................................................................................................14
Uniqueness – NG Prices High.................................................................................................................................................15
Uniqueness – NG Prices High.................................................................................................................................................16
Uniqueness – NG Prices High.................................................................................................................................................17
Uniqueness – NG Prices High.................................................................................................................................................18
Uniqueness – NG Prices High.................................................................................................................................................19
Uniqueness – NG Prices Low.................................................................................................................................................20
Uniqueness – NG Prices Low.................................................................................................................................................21
Uniqueness – NG Prices Low.................................................................................................................................................22
Uniqueness – NG Prices Increasing........................................................................................................................................23
Uniqueness – NG Prices Increasing........................................................................................................................................24
Uniqueness – NG Prices Decreasing.......................................................................................................................................25
Uniqueness – NG Drilling Increasing.....................................................................................................................................26
Uniqueness – LNG Increasing................................................................................................................................................27
Uniqueness – LNG Increasing................................................................................................................................................28
Uniqueness – LNG Increasing................................................................................................................................................29
Uniqueness – LNG Increasing................................................................................................................................................30
Uniqueness – LNG Increasing................................................................................................................................................31
Uniqueness – LNG Increasing................................................................................................................................................32
Uniqueness – LNG Increasing................................................................................................................................................33
Uniqueness – LNG Increasing................................................................................................................................................34
Uniqueness – LNG Increasing................................................................................................................................................35
Uniqueness – LNG Demand Increasing..................................................................................................................................36
Uniqueness – LNG Demand Decreasing................................................................................................................................37
Uniqueness – NG Demand Decreasing...................................................................................................................................38
GENERAL LINKS/INTERNALS..................................................................................39
Links – RE decreases NG Demand.........................................................................................................................................40
Links – RE decreases NG Demand.........................................................................................................................................41
Links – RE decreases NG Demand ........................................................................................................................................42
Links – RE increases NG demand...........................................................................................................................................43
Links – AE decreases NG Prices.............................................................................................................................................44
Links – AE decreases NG Prices.............................................................................................................................................45
Links – Wind Decreases NG Demand.....................................................................................................................................46
Links – Nuclear Decreases NG Demand.................................................................................................................................47
Links – Solar Decreases NG Demand.....................................................................................................................................48
Links – US key to global gas prices........................................................................................................................................49
Internals – Global NG Market.................................................................................................................................................50
Internals – LNG Global Market..............................................................................................................................................51
Internals – NG Demand key to LNG......................................................................................................................................52
Internals – NG Demand key to LNG......................................................................................................................................53
AT: AE Decreases Natural Gas................................................................................................................................................54
1
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
CANADA..........................................................................................................................55
SHELL – CANADA...............................................................................................................................................................56
SHELL – CANADA...............................................................................................................................................................57
SHELL – CANADA...............................................................................................................................................................58
SHELL – CANADA...............................................................................................................................................................59
Links – Supplier......................................................................................................................................................................60
Links – Supplier .....................................................................................................................................................................61
Links – Energy Cooperation....................................................................................................................................................62
Impacts – Relations.................................................................................................................................................................63
Impacts – Relations.................................................................................................................................................................64
Impacts – Afghanistan Module...............................................................................................................................................65
Impacts – Afghanistan Extensions..........................................................................................................................................66
Impacts – Military...................................................................................................................................................................67
Impacts – Trade.......................................................................................................................................................................68
Impacts – WOT.......................................................................................................................................................................69
CANADA AFF..................................................................................................................70
2AC – CANADA....................................................................................................................................................................71
INDONESIA...................................................................................................................108
SHELL – INDONESIA ........................................................................................................................................................109
SHELL – INDONESIA.........................................................................................................................................................110
SHELL – INDONESIA.........................................................................................................................................................111
SHELL – INDONESIA ........................................................................................................................................................112
Uniqueness – Indonesian Prices High...................................................................................................................................113
Uniqueness – Indonesian NG Strong....................................................................................................................................114
Internals – Indonesia Supplier...............................................................................................................................................115
Internals – Indonesia Wants US Markets..............................................................................................................................116
Internals – NG key to Relations............................................................................................................................................117
Brink – Investment................................................................................................................................................................118
Impacts – Economy ..............................................................................................................................................................119
Impacts – Stability.................................................................................................................................................................120
Impacts – Stability ................................................................................................................................................................121
Impacts – Stability ................................................................................................................................................................122
Impacts – Stability ................................................................................................................................................................123
Impacts – Turns the Case......................................................................................................................................................124
Impact Booster – Stability.....................................................................................................................................................125
INDIA-PAKISTAN........................................................................................................135
SHELL – IPI PIPELINE.......................................................................................................................................................136
SHELL – IPI PIPELINE.......................................................................................................................................................137
Uniqueness – IPI Pipeline Coming.......................................................................................................................................139
Uniqueness – Indian Demand High......................................................................................................................................140
Brink – India-Iran Relations..................................................................................................................................................141
Link – Demand key to IPI.....................................................................................................................................................142
Link – Prices key to Pipeline.................................................................................................................................................143
Link – Prices key to Pipeline.................................................................................................................................................144
Internals – Iran Wants Pipeline..............................................................................................................................................145
Internals – Iran Natural Gas Untapped..................................................................................................................................146
Internals – India Natural Gas Demand .................................................................................................................................147
Internals – India Natural Gas Demand..................................................................................................................................148
Internals – India Natural Gas Demand..................................................................................................................................149
Internals – India Natural Gas Demand..................................................................................................................................150
Internals – Iran Supplies Natural Gas...................................................................................................................................151
Impacts – Stability ................................................................................................................................................................152
3
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
RUSSIA...........................................................................................................................187
SHELL – RUSSIA................................................................................................................................................................188
SHELL – RUSSIA................................................................................................................................................................189
Uniqueness – Natural Gas Dependence Growing.................................................................................................................190
Uniqueness – Russia NG Use Increasing..............................................................................................................................191
Uniqueness – Gazprom.........................................................................................................................................................192
Uniqueness – Gazprom.........................................................................................................................................................193
Internals – Energy key to Relations......................................................................................................................................194
Internals – Russian Energy Dominance................................................................................................................................195
Internals – Natural Gas Key to Relations..............................................................................................................................196
Internals – Natural Gas Key to Relations..............................................................................................................................197
Internals – Natural Gas Key to Relations..............................................................................................................................198
Internals – Natural Gas Key to Relations..............................................................................................................................199
Internals – US key to Natural Gas.........................................................................................................................................200
Internals – Gazprom Investing in US....................................................................................................................................201
Impacts – NATO Backlash....................................................................................................................................................202
Impacts – NATO key to Relations.........................................................................................................................................203
Impacts – Neo-Imperialism...................................................................................................................................................204
4
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
RUSSIA AFF..................................................................................................................212
2AC – RUSSIA.....................................................................................................................................................................213
2AC – RUSSIA.....................................................................................................................................................................214
2AC – RUSSIA.....................................................................................................................................................................215
2AC – RUSSIA.....................................................................................................................................................................216
AFF – Non-Unique................................................................................................................................................................217
AFF – Energy key to Russian Influence...............................................................................................................................218
AFF – Russian Influence Increasing Now............................................................................................................................219
AFF – No I/L – Too Much U.S. Supply................................................................................................................................220
AFF – Empirically Denied – Energy Relations.....................................................................................................................221
AFF – I/L Turn – Retaliation.................................................................................................................................................222
AFF – Relations Non-Unique...............................................................................................................................................223
FLARING.......................................................................................................................224
SHELL – FLARING.............................................................................................................................................................225
SHELL – FLARING ............................................................................................................................................................226
SHELL – FLARING ............................................................................................................................................................227
SHELL – FLARING.............................................................................................................................................................228
Link – Oil..............................................................................................................................................................................229
Internals – Low Prices = Flaring...........................................................................................................................................230
Internals – Low Prices = Flaring...........................................................................................................................................231
Internals – High Prices Solve Flaring...................................................................................................................................232
Internals – High Prices Solve Flaring...................................................................................................................................233
Impact Booster – Methane....................................................................................................................................................234
Impact Booster – Methane....................................................................................................................................................235
Impacts – Warming................................................................................................................................................................236
Impacts – Military.................................................................................................................................................................237
Impacts – Human Rights.......................................................................................................................................................238
Impacts – Value of Life.........................................................................................................................................................239
Impacts – Communities.........................................................................................................................................................240
FLARING AFF..............................................................................................................241
2AC – FLARING .................................................................................................................................................................242
INDUSTRIES DA..........................................................................................................243
SHELL – INDUSTRIES HYDROGEN................................................................................................................................244
SHELL – INDUSTRIES HYDROGEN................................................................................................................................245
SHELL – INDUSTRIES CAP AND TRADE.......................................................................................................................246
SHELL – INDUSTRIES CAP AND TRADE.......................................................................................................................247
Links – Hydrogen Cars.........................................................................................................................................................248
Links – Hydrogen Links........................................................................................................................................................249
Links – Cap and Trade..........................................................................................................................................................250
Links – Cap and Trade..........................................................................................................................................................251
Link Amplifier – Chemical Industry.....................................................................................................................................252
Brink – Chemical Industry....................................................................................................................................................253
Internals – Manufacturing.....................................................................................................................................................254
5
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
INDUSTRIES AFF........................................................................................................275
2AC – Industries....................................................................................................................................................................276
2AC – Industries .................................................................................................................................................................277
2AC – Industries....................................................................................................................................................................278
RANDOMNESS.............................................................................................................279
Natural Gas Peak...................................................................................................................................................................280
Natural Gas Peak...................................................................................................................................................................281
Natural Gas Price Spikes.......................................................................................................................................................282
Natural Gas Price Spikes.......................................................................................................................................................283
Gas Markets Risky................................................................................................................................................................284
Energy Regulation Bad.........................................................................................................................................................285
AT: Wind Can Act as Hedge..................................................................................................................................................286
AT: Resource War with China/India......................................................................................................................................287
6
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
GENERAL UNIQUENESS
This section contains uniqueness arguments for the rest of the file.
7
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
8
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
If North American natural gas markets are to function with the flexibility exhibited by
oil, more extensive access to the vast world reserves of gas is required. Markets need to
be able to adjust effectively to unexpected shortfalls in domestic supply in the same way
that they do in oil. Access to world natural gas supplies will require a major expansion of
LNG terminal import capacity and the development of the newer offshore re-gasification
technologies. Without the flexibility such facilities impart, imbalances in supply and
demand must inevitably engender price volatility.
As the technology of LNG liquefaction and shipping has improved and as safety
considerations have lessened, a major expansion of U.S. import capability appears to be
under way. These movements bode well for widespread natural gas availability in North
America in the next decade and beyond. The near term, however, is apt to continue to be
challenging
But it wasn't Mr. Buffett. It was another billionaire named George B. Kaiser. A relative unknown even in his home state of
Oklahoma, Mr. Kaiser is a publicity-shy businessman with a fortune built on oil and banks. Like Mr. Buffett, who has been
acquiring natural-gas pipelines, Mr. Kaiser is making a huge bet that demand for natural gas will continue to surge because
it's a clean-burning fuel for power generation. Right now, most of North America's natural-gas supply comes from North
American wells. The gas goes from the wells through a network of underground pipelines to final users, without ever changing its
gaseous form. That's the most efficient way -- but America is running out of its local supply. Imports are an obvious answer.
But to travel over the seas, the gas first has to be changed into a super-cooled liquid, loaded onto tankers and then changed back
into gaseous form. Currently, tankers unload their cargoes at one of four onshore terminals in the U.S., where the liquid is heated
up. The capacity is limited, and with demand for natural-gas imports rising, more terminals are needed. But they face opposition
by many communities worried that the fuel-filled structures or tankers could explode or be targeted by terrorists. Mr. Kaiser's new
way of handling imports is called Energy Bridge. He's invested $660 million in the project since he took it over from El Paso in
December 2003. Energy Bridge is scheduled to go into operation next January in the Gulf of Mexico, about 100 miles off the
Louisiana shoreline. The technology works like this: Special tankers carrying liquefied natural gas from places like Egypt and
Trinidad would idle in the gulf. The liquid would be heated while still on the tankers, returned to gaseous form and sent via an
underwater pipeline into the U.S. pipeline network. The Energy Bridge, with its tankers far beyond the horizon, eliminates the risk
of explosions on land and thus sidesteps not-in-my-backyard controversies. If everything works as planned, backers say, the gulf
project could increase the U.S.'s import capacity by up to 20 percent. When El Paso put Energy Bridge up for sale, several of the
world's biggest oil companies took a look but decided against buying it, partly because of its untested technology. Liquefied
natural gas, or LNG, has never been turned into a gaseous form aboard a floating ship, and there were concerns about the
impact of the rocking motion. While the process worked in a simulator built by El Paso in Alabama to mimic the motion of 12-
foot swells, the technology still hasn't been tested under real-life conditions. Some people are also skeptical Mr. Kaiser will be
able to buy enough liquefied natural gas, in part because most of the supply is already under contract. "You can't just sail up and
say fill 'er up," says Ira Joseph, managing director for global LNG at PIRA Energy. "The LNG business doesn't work that way."
9
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Demand for natural gas is increasing throughout the U.S. as the price of oil continues to rise. The Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission now is considering applications for LNG terminals all along the U.S. coast. Critics of the two
Passamaquoddy Bay projects point out that several other proposals would be located closer to the big metropolitan areas of the
Northeast.
10
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
The natural gas infrastructure in the United States accounts for 25% of the nation's primary energy consumption
(including heating and other applications). The consumption of natural gas has increased by roughly 14% in the past
decade and is expected to grow by over 50% over the next 20 years, as shown in Fig. 1 [1], [2]. Fig. 2 shows that in the
years 1997–2001, natural gas provided about 24% of the U.S. electricity generation [3].
The continuing and rapid growth in gas-fired electric power generating plants (e.g., combined-cycle units) will
consume a larger share of the forecasted increase in natural gas demand in the coming decades.
In Fig. 3, the amount of natural gas used for electricity generation is projected to triple by 2020 [2]. Seven states
(Rhode Island, New York, Delaware, Louisiana, Texas, California, and Alaska) currently obtain over one-third
of their electricity generation from natural gas. The primary reason for this increase is that the natural gas is the
preferred fuel for more than 96% of the 200 new generation projects in the United States. This dramatic shift to natural
gas is further driven by improved efficiencies, lower capital costs, reduced construction time, more expeditious
permitting, and environmental compliance of natural gas-burning combined-cycle units.
The possibility of replacing coal and oil burning plants with natural gas plants could greatly improve the
sustainability of forests, waters, and farmlands, which are negatively affected by acid deposition. It is imperative to
recognize that no new nuclear capacity construction is projected in the near future and an estimated 15 GW of
nuclear generation capacity is projected for retirement by 2015 as some licenses expire. Nuclear retirements
could further increase the need for natural gas infrastructure in the 2015 time frame.
11
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
12
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Market Watch, 7/14/08, “NOIA Applauds Lifting of Executive Prohibition of Federal Offshore Oil and Gas Drilling,” PRNewswire-
USNewswire via COMTEX, http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/noia-applauds-lifting-executive-
prohibition/story.aspx?guid=%7B9DD97BD5-D6FE-44AE-BCF9-3A3AA1DB1A61%7D&dist=hppr
The National Ocean Industries Association (NOIA) commends today's historic action by President George W. Bush which lifts the
18-year-old Executive Withdrawal of much of the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) for oil and gas exploration and drilling.
"The President took a major step today toward reversing a flawed public policy that for decades has prevented energy supply from
keeping pace with increasing demand," said Tom Fry, president of NOIA.
About 85 percent of the OCS has been off limits to hydrocarbon development for nearly three decades. In addition to today's
revocation of the Presidential Withdrawal, a 26-year-old Congressional moratorium on hydrocarbon development must also be lifted
in order to fully open up the OCS to oil and natural gas exploration and production.
"While the President's move will not solve all of the nation's energy challenges, it sends a strong signal to Congress that it is time to
end the annual Congressional moratoria," said Fry. "It also acknowledges growing public support for increased domestic
offshore production of hydrocarbons."
The Minerals Management Service (MMS) estimates that there are 18 billion barrels of untapped oil and 76.5 trillion cubic feet of
untapped natural gas in the portion of the OCS currently off limits to oil and gas production. "Those estimates are likely conservative,
since the very policies that have put the majority of the OCS off limits to hydrocarbon development have prevented industry from
using modern technology to assess untapped resources," said Fry. "In short, industry is relying on estimates based on 1970's
technology."
The 15 percent of Outer Continental Shelf currently open to hydrocarbon exploration and development supplies 27 percent of
America's domestic oil production and about 15 percent of our domestic natural gas production.
"We are the only nation in the world that consistently limits access to our own domestic resources, despite a long record of safe and
environmentally-responsible exploration and production of offshore oil and gas," Fry said. "In light of rapidly growing global
demand for hydrocarbons, and the resulting negative impacts on the American economy and overall quality of life, the locking
up of U.S. energy resources makes absolutely no sense."
13
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Thomas Content, Journal Sentinel, 7-6-2008, High natural gas costs expected to boost
heating bills this winter. <<http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=769652>>
The price of gasoline, above $4 for the past month, is on people’s minds — and it’s visible at nearly every major intersection.
But another energy jolt may be coming as the price of natural gas, the primary fuel used to heat Wisconsin homes, is at historic
highs for this time of year.
Natural gas futures have jumped 82% since the start of the year. Heating oil and propane prices are also soaring.
The increased natural gas prices already have resulted in electricity bills jumping twice since March for customers of
Milwaukee-based We Energies and Green Bay-based Wisconsin Public Service Corp. Including increases authorized for three
other state utilities, customers of the state’s five investor-owned utilities have seen rates rise by $210 million since the start of
the year.
Spokesmen for the state’s large natural gas utilities said it’s too early to predict what customers may pay this winter. The
futures price of natural gas, which finished last week at its highest point in more than 2 1/2 years, could still fall below its
current, abnormal high, they said.
“Prices right now are in the scary range,” said Kerry Spees, spokesman for Wisconsin Public Service, an electric and natural
gas utility. “It makes you look toward the winter with a little trepidation.”
Other energy futures also rose Monday. April heating oil futures rose 2.64 cents to settle at $2.9734 a gallon while April gasoline
futures rose 2.06 cents to settle at $2.7149 a gallon.
April natural gas futures jumped 25.5 cents to $10.024 per 1,000 cubic feet, the first time a natural gas contract has closed above $10
since January 2006. Natural gas was following oil higher, but also rising in anticipation of cooler temperatures across the Midwest and
Northeast, analysts said.
In London, Brent crude futures rose $1.78 to $104.16 a barrel on the ICE Futures exchange.
In a separate survey, the national average price of a gallon of gas rose 0.7 cents overnight to $3.222 a gallon, according to AAA and
the Oil Price Information Service. Last May, prices peaked at $3.227 as surging demand and a string of refinery outages raised
concerns about supplies.(See explainer, above left, for why the gas price reports differ).
14
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Forecasts for future increases in natural gas prices should be doubled or tripled
Global Power Report, 5/17/07, “Congress is under estimating carbon costs by low balling gas forecast, say
consultants, pg lexis //EM
Energy-intensive industries said this week that Congress is under estimating the cost of a nationwide carbon cap-and-trade
program because government forecasts have unrealistic assumptions for future natural gas prices. Current forecasts by
the Energy Information Administration and others that long-term gas prices will stabilize at roughly $4.50/MMBtu
should assume prices two or three times that figure for two reasons, officials with Industrial Energy Consumers of
America told reporters at a briefing. IECA Executive Director Paul Cicio and Andy Weismann, a consultant to the trade
group, said most forecasts today under estimate how quickly additional natural gas supplies can be expected from the
proposed Alaska natural gas pipeline and new liquefied natural gas terminals. Cicio made his comments as IECA and
other trade groups are ramping up a lobbying campaign aimed at getting Congress to lift government barriers to more LNG
terminals and expanded domestic gas drilling, he said. Weismann said he does not see the natural gas pipeline project,
which would deliver 5 Bcf of natural gas into the Lower-48 states each day, coming online before 2015. That is five years
or more beyond what the EIA projects. If there are delays in permitting or funding the project, "that's a 5 Bcf/day hole in US
supply, and I don't know how you fill that easily," Weismann said. He also said the projected $25 billion capital cost of the
projects could actually be as high as $40 billion because the cost of raw materials such as concrete and steel have risen
substantially in light of the construction boom in China and India. "One could easily argue that natural gas price
forecasts should be two to three times as high as they are now," Weismann said.
15
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Despite natural gas price drop, the commodities boom isn’t over yet. This is only a short term correction
Stevenson Jacobs, AP Business Writer, 7/17/08, Associated Press Financial Wire, “Commodities Drop for 3rd
day as Oil Keeps Falling” pg lexis //EM
Commodities turned lower for a third day Thursday, as steep drops in crude oil and natural gas prices fed beliefs that high
energy costs are curbing Americans' fuel consumption and at least temporarily cooling the commodities boom. Crude oil
had another day of sharp losses, falling more than $5 a barrel after a big sell-off of natural gas. Oil also fell more than $10 in
the previous two sessions. The drop in energy helped send soybeans, silver, corn and other commodities sharply lower. "We're
seeing some worries about demand destruction in oil, so I think that's creating some fear among investors and leading them to
sell," said Tom Pawlicki, commodities analyst with MF Global Research in Chicago. Worries about the health of the American
economy has weighed heavily on commodities this week. Investors are concerned that rising inflation and weak economic
growth will slow consumer spending and curb demand for raw materials in the U.S. and overseas. Despite the sharp drop in
futures prices in recent days, few analysts predict an end to the white-hot commodities boom of the last year. Pawlicki
called this week's sell-off a "short-term correction" and predicted prices would turn higher in coming days and months
as investors who have been bearish on stocks shift funds back into commodities. "I think it's too early to call a top to
this market," Pawlicki said. The drop in crude prices weighed on agriculture futures Thursday, with corn, wheat and soybeans
all dropping sharply. Also pressuring prices was more favorable growing weather in the Midwest and a vote by Argentina's
Senate to block a hotly disputed grains-export tax that had prompted weeks of farming strikes and food shortages. Soybeans for
November delivery fell 50.5 cents to $14.975 a bushel on the Chicago Board of Trade, after earlier falling to $14.90 a bushel.
Corn for December delivery lost 28.75 cents to $6.485 a bushel, while September wheat dropped 24.5 cents to $8.095 a bushel.
In energy markets, crude oil fell sharply Thursday, sent lower following the biggest one-day drop in natural gas prices in nearly
a year. Light, sweet crude for August delivery fell $5.31 to settle at $129.29 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange.
Prices have fallen about $15 in the past three days. Natural gas futures for August delivery fell as much as 8.2 percent in
the day, the biggest one-day drop in nearly a year. Natural gas fell 13.8 percent on Aug. 20, 2007, according to Nathan Golz,
researcher at Wachovia Securities in St. Louis.
16
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Steve Brannish, Staff writer for Dayton Daily News, June 25, 2008, [Dayton Daily News]
“Vectren: Natural Gas Prices Could Rise 50% this Winter,” [MM]
<<http://www.daytondailynews.com/n/content/oh/story/news/local/2008/06/25/ddn062508natgasweb.html>>
DAYTON — Vectren Ohio is so alarmed about a sharp hike in the price of natural gas it expects this winter that it's
warning customers in June to prepare for the worst.
While significant factors remain unknown — including the severity of the 2008-09 winter — the utility that serves
318,000 customers in 17 southwestern Ohio counties wants ratepayers to make moves now to avoid a budget crisis.
Vectren spokeswoman Chase Kelley said Wednesday, June 25, the cost of natural gas, which represents 70 to 80 percent
of a customer's bill, could rise as much as 50 percent.
"Year-round demand on natural gas, spurred from an increase in the use of natural gas to produce electricity, continues to
force prices higher," Kelley said. Vectren will issue winter bill projections in early fall to help customers, Kelley said.
Elwin Green, Writer for Pittsburgh Post Gazette, June 30, 2008, [Pittsburgh Post Gazette], “Natural Gas Bills will
Be Going Up.” <<http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/08182/893778-100.stm?cmpid=news.xml>>
[MM]
Starting tomorrow, Pittsburgh's three natural gas utilities will all charge more for gas.
Dominion Peoples will increase its gas cost recovery rate, the amount that it charges consumers to pass on their costs for natural gas,
to $15.89 per thousand cubic feet (mcf), up from $12.44. Equitable Gas will charge $16.47 per mcf, up from $13.97, and Columbia
Gas customers will see an increase to $14.12, up from $9.84.
Spokesmen for the utilities attributed the increases largely to skyrocketing prices for natural gas, fueled by increased demand, in turn
sparked by record prices for crude oil.
Besides its gas cost recovery filing, Equitable Gas also filed for an increase in its distribution rate that would produce $51.9 million
that the company wants to use to update and maintain its infrastructure.
17
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Three Oregon gas utilities will seek rate increases this summer, with Northwest Natural Gas Co. predicting prices could rise 40
percent.
NW Natural (NYSE: NWN), Avista Utilities and Cascade Natural Gas briefed the Oregon Public Utility Commission on Tuesday,
indicating all three would file requests in August. The companies each pass the cost of purchasing natural gas onto customers.
Portland-based NW Natural, the state's largest utility with about 657,000 customers in Oregon and southwest Washington, is expecting
prices to jump between 35 percent and 40 percent.
Avista Utilities, part of Spokane, Wash.-based Avista Corp., which serves portions of southwest and northeastern Oregon, is expecting
prices to creep up 10 percent to 15 percent.
And Cascade Natural Gas, with customers in central Oregon, expects prices to be 15 percent to 20 percent higher than a year ago.
Growing demand, tighter supplies and international market pressures this year are driving the cost increases, according to the PUC.
18
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
CNN, 7/3/08, “Avista warns of continued natural gas price hikes”, CNN money
http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/apwire/919e35e0554e2f663d1af503d11a7862.htm#TOP //EM
NEW YORK (Associated Press) - Normally, natural gas prices are low in the summer months and utilities stock up for
sale in the winter. This year, though, a spike in energy prices is also hitting natural gas, which likely means higher prices
for consumers this winter, Avista Corp. warned Wednesday. Kevin Christie, Avista's director of gas supply, said prices rose
from an average of $7.39 per dekatherm in June 2007 to $12.81 per dekatherm last month, a 73 percent increase. A
typical home in the utility's service areas in Eastern Washington, northern Idaho and Oregon uses about seven dekatherms a
month. "The combination of an unusually long winter and cold spring created higher demand for natural gas, which
depleted storage reserves across the country," Christie said in a release. High prices for crude oil, plus lower natural gas
imports into the United States, are also pushing prices up, Christie said. The lack of lower spring and summer prices
means natural gas rates for customers will likely increase when Avista files its annual "purchase gas cost adjustments"
in September, although the amount of the increase remains undetermined, Christie said.
19
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Natural gas prices are the lowest in the world, we’re not even on a competitive level with Asia and Europe
John Lowe, Executive Vice President Exploration and Production Connoco Phillips, 5/22/08, House Committee
CQ Transcript, “Rep John Conyers Jr. Holds a Hearing on Retail Prices of Gas and Competition in the Oil
Industry” pg lexis //EM
So we are competing every day, whether it's crude prices, whether it's natural gas prices. You see we have an empty LNG port
in the Gulf Coast because the price of natural gas in the United States is well below what the natural gas price is in Asia
and Europe. And so we cannot compete for that natural gas, the LNG, away from elsewhere in the world.
20
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Midnight Trader, 7/17/08, Comtex News Network “Oil, Natural Gas Prices Tumble in Volatile Trading, Lifting
Stocks” pg lexis //EM
Oil prices are tumbling for the third straight day and natural gas futures are selling off amid growing concerns that a
weaker U.S. economy and consumer reaction to high gas prices will slash demand. Light, sweet crude for August delivery
is down $3.50 at $131.10 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange in extremely volatile trading. Oil is now down about
$14 in the last three days.the AP reports. Natural gas prices are also plunging, down 82.6 cents at $10.572 per 1,000 cubic
feet. It has tumbled more than 20% since its peak in July.
Nathaniel Gronewold, reporter, 7/17/08, E&E News Report, “Natural Gas: Rising LNG Imports Should Lower
Prices Next Year -- report” pg lexis //EM
Waterborne Energy, a Houston-based market intelligence firm tracking worldwide imports and exports of liquefied
natural gas (LNG) and liquefied petroleum gas, says a looming "production bubble" fueled by new overseas LNG supplies
coming online later this year and next should see a rush of imports to the United States. The new supply should be
enough to put significant downward pressure on U.S. natural gas prices, they predict. "We anticipate that
between November 2008 and December 2009 about 2,868 bcf [billion cubic feet] of new LNG will be introduced to the
marketplace," said Steve Johnson, Waterborne's president, in a report announcing the firm's findings. "This should begin to
significantly impact the U.S. LNG market by the summer of 2009." According to his firm's latest assessment, this year has
seen weaker-than-anticipated growth in LNG imports to the U.S. market primarily because many projects in
development abroad have seen their estimated completion dates pushed back. Rising demand and some supply
disruptions also hindered new LNG import development and helped push natural gas prices to record highs, the report
says. But new LNG facilities being built in Qatar, Nigeria, Yemen, Russia and Indonesia should be completed and start
producing gas beginning later this year and on into 2009, the firm says. The added capacity should push monthly global
LNG production up to approximately 117 bcf by the end of March 2009, followed by even more capacity coming online
in the later half of that year. The boost in global supply is "set to dramatically shift the dynamics of the global LNG
market," Johnson predicts.
21
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Adam Schreck, AP Business Writer, 7/17/08, Associated Press Worldstream, “Oil and Gas Prices in Extended
Fall: Traders Seek Clues of Bottoming-Out or a Breather” pg lexis //EM
Oil is now more than 10 percent cheaper per barrel than it was on Monday; natural gas prices are down more than 20
percent just since the Fourth of July. Still, experts are not convinced that prices have turned a corner. "There's no bell
that tells you when the market has turned," said James Cordier, president of Tampa, Florida-based trading firms Liberty
Trading Group and OptionSellers.com. Light, sweet crude for August delivery dropped $5.31 to settle at $129.29 a barrel on
the New York Mercantile Exchange. Prices have fallen nearly $16 in just the past three days. Natural gas futures for August
delivery fell more than 8 percent Thursday, marking their biggest one-day drop in nearly a year, according to Nathan
Golz, researcher at Wachovia Securities in St. Louis. Prices for the key Heating, cooking and power generation fuel settled
86.1 cents lower at $10.537, their lowest point since April. A number of market observers say there simply wasn't
enough support for the recent run up in natural gas prices, and that this week's sell-off of oil has only helped speed the
declines. "Any time oil goes up or down on Nymex, it's going to have a carry-over effect on natural gas," said Michael Rieke,
senior managing editor for power and gas at energy research firm Platts. The immediate cause of Thursday's sharp natural
gas decline was a larger-than-expected increase of U.S. supplies.
22
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Bloomberg. 07/02/08. “Natural Gas to Converge With Oil Price, Exporters Say.” [Takumi
Murayama]
July 2 (Bloomberg) -- Natural gas, trading at a 40 percent discount to crude, may rise to reach the record price of oil as
demand for cleaner-burning fuels increases, according to energy ministers from Qatar, Algeria and Iran.
U.K. natural gas sells for 71.35 pence a therm, or the equivalent of $85 a barrel based on its energy content, compared with
$141 for Brent crude. British natural gas rose 38 percent this year, lagging behind the 50 percent advance in oil.
Natural-gas use worldwide rose 3.1 percent last year, almost three times faster than the 1.1 percent increase in oil, according
to figures compiled by BP Plc. Gas is cleaner-burning than oil and creates half as much carbon dioxide as coal when used to
generate power, helping ease the buildup of greenhouse gases blamed for climate change.
``Gas is clean and it is an alternative to oil,'' Qatar Oil Minister Abdullah al-Attiyah said in an interview in Madrid this week.
``The price should be at least competitive to oil.'' Qatar holds 895 trillion cubic feet of gas reserves, the world's third- largest,
after Russia and Iran.
Rising global energy demand, environmental restrictions and slower progress in expanding nuclear power and wind
farms are increasing demand for gas.
Liquefied natural gas may become more expensive than crude oil as demand from Asia and Europe rises faster than
supply, Sanford C. Bernstein & Co. said in a report last month.
Winter Prices
``Clearly, global demand for natural gas is racing ahead,'' Linda Cook, executive director of gas and power at Royal Dutch
Shell Plc, the biggest non-government producer of LNG, said at the World Petroleum Congress today in Madrid. ``The
question is whether supply can keep pace.''
In Japan, utilities paid as much as $20 a million British thermal units for LNG imports last winter, which equates to an oil price
of $120 a barrel, after an earthquake closed the country's largest nuclear power reactor. U.K. prices for the 2008-2009 winter
trade at a similar level.
``Gas prices will follow oil prices; they will converge,'' said Algerian Energy Minister Chakib Khelil. The country is scaling
back oil production growth to concentrate on gas.
23
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
24
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
25
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Daniel Goldstein, THE AMERICAS; Pg. 7 Vol. 86 No. 78, 4-21-2008, “Oil and gas price surge spurs jump
in Q1 drilling: API,” [LexisNexis Academic].
<<http://www.lexisnexis.com/us/lnacademic/results/docview/docview.do?docLinkInd=true&risb=21_T4190843381&format=G
NBFI&sort=RELEVANCE&startDocNo=1&resultsUrlKey=29_T4190843351&cisb=22_T4190843383&treeMax=true&treeWi
dth=0&csi=8046&docNo=10>> [MM]
Record high prices for crude oil and sharply higher prices for natural gas spurred a 4% jump in drilling activity in the first
quarter of 2008, according to an American Petroleum Institute report released April 18.
Completion for oil wells was the highest since 1986.
An estimated 13,497 oil wells, natural gas wells and dry holes were completed in the first quarter of 2008, up 4% from the first
quarter of 2007, the API report showed.
"Strong oil and natural gas prices continue to encourage more drilling activity, even as federal policy limits access to non-park
land and most of the Outer Continental Shelf for development," said Hazem Arafa, director of API's statistics department, in a
statement.
API's estimates show the resurgence in oil well completion activity that began in 2000 is continuing into 2008. An estimated
4,577 oil wells were completed in the first quarter, up 12% year-on-year and the highest first quarter estimated oil activity since
1986.
Natural gas continues to be the primary target for domestic drilling, with an estimated 7,459 natural gas wells completed in the
first three months of 2008. That was down 1% from last year's first quarter but nearly double the drilling activity of a decade
ago.
Total estimated exploratory well completions, accounting for nearly 15% of total estimated well completions, increased 37% in
the first quarter compared with the same quarter last year.
26
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Global trade in liquefied natural gas (LNG) trade is growing in volume and strategic importance.
In the last eight years, growth in LNG volume with has been accompanied by an ongoing
transformation in its business character. The traditional project-utility chain model supported
funding of facility chains for new LNG trades with tight bilateral long-term contractual
commercial relationships between the LNG export project as seller and the monopoly-franchised
gas transmission merchant or electricity utility as buyer. Through a process that Joseph
Schumpeter would have described as creative destruction, new projects are being formed by LNG
merchants – major energy companies who control facilities and retain title to the LNG through
the chain. This new business model, called commercial LNG, is still evolving. It is being driven
by the confluence of three trends: growing size and scope of LNG trade, lower costs through the
LNG facilities chain, and the erosion of utility monopoly franchises in competitive inland natural
gas markets.
27
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
The increasing supply–demand gap in the US is currently met by imports from Canada, Mexico, and offshore LNG. LNG
imports more than doubled between 2000 (220 bcf) and 2006 (585 bcf, or 2% of total imports). The share of LNG in total
supply—delivered from various sources mainly in the Atlantic Basin—is expected to increase to approximately 20% by 2020.
In 2006, Canada contributed 3.5 tcf and Mexico only 2 bcf. Canadian production (and therefore supplies) is expected to decline.
Mexican imports are expected to increase significantly when LNG will be delivered to Mexican facilities adjacent to the
California border where the regasified LNG will supply southern California.
The US will become a much larger player in the globalizing natural gas market as importing regions compete for supplies.
Within this market environment, the challenge for North American investors is to secure the right amount of LNG delivered
as needed. We observe that the global super majors are already engaged along the entire LNG value chain (Ruester and
Neumann, 2006), controlling upstream liquefaction, midstream shipping, and downstream regasification capacities. There will be
little spare capacity on the export side available for contract with new entrants. New business models like the operation of
regasification terminals as “tolling facilities” will appear in the competitive US natural gas market.
Even though prices have increased and are expected to stay well above the levels of the pre-2000 era, the US will continue to rely
on natural gas to both ensure supply security and mitigate emissions. Reports from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
on the devastating pace of climate change make natural gas the fuel of choice for electric generation, thus calling for LNG
capacity to be built now.
28
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
29
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
30
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
31
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
32
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Merrill Lynch, the world's largest brokerage firm, plans to invest in liquefied natural gas production plants as the United
States and Europe import more of the fuel. Merrill Lynch is considering investing in plants in countries like Papua New
Guinea, said Richard Jefferis, a managing director of Merrill Lynch
Commodities in Houston. The company earlier this year bought capacity at a Sempra Energy liquefied natural gas import terminal
being built in Louisiana, owns capacity at a British terminal and is studying another liquefied natural gas port in Europe. Merrill
Lynch is among investors positioning themselves for increased trading in liquefied natural gas, or LNG, a commodity
traditionally dominated by rigid supply contracts that run for as long 25 years. Sempra, Exxon Mobil and other companies are
building enough terminal capacity to double imports into the United States, where domestic production has failed to keep pace
with demand.
''In every business that we're in, we are physical players in the supply chain as well as financial players,'' Jefferis said in a
telephone interview Friday. ''We look at LNG as something that we need to be in.'' Merrill Lynch handles about 5 percent of all
physical natural gas volumes traded in the United States, about 7 percent of financial volumes and controls about 8 percent of
U.S. storage. The company is looking to source liquefied natural gas from several projects including the plant in Papua New
Guinea, Jefferis said, declining to say how much Merrill Lynch is investing in the liquefied natural gas venture or how large a
stake it may take
Liquefied natural gas is natural gas that has been chilled to liquid form, reducing it to one-six-hundredth of its original volume,
for transportation by ship to destinations not connected by pipeline. On arrival, it is turned back into gas for distribution to power
plants, factories and households. Merrill wants to build its liquefied natural gas business to take advantage in trading of
price differences between natural gas and oil, and between liquefied natural gas markets in the Atlantic and the Pacific
regions, Jefferis said.
33
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
34
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Declining domestic supply and increasing demand will require increased LNG exports in the US
Canaport LNG No Date Given (http://www.canaportlng.com/need_for_lng.php)
By 2015, The Atlantic Basin will account for half of the global LNG trade, according to forecasts by industry consultant Poten
& Partners. The most significant contributor to this growth in demand is the United States and Canada, which will make up 50
percent of the Atlantic Basin LNG demand by 2015. In the U.S., demand for natural gas is expected to increase by 1.5 percent a
year between 2003 and 2025, reaching 30.7 trillion cubic feet per year in 2025. In parts of northeastern U.S., demand is
expected to increase even faster -- by 1.9 percent a year in New York, for example. During the same period, natural gas
production in the U.S. is only expected to grow at 0.6 percent a year, less than half the pace of growth in demand. These
supply-demand dynamics would result in a significant supply shortfall. To bridge the widening supply-demand gap, the U.S. is
expected to increase LNG imports to 8.9 trillion cubic feet by 2025. As a result, the percentage of U.S. natural gas supply
provided by LNG is projected to increase from approximately 2 percent in 2003 to more than 20 percent in 2025, according to
the U.S. Energy Department.
US demand is increasing
Frank A. Verrastro, Director and Senior Fellow Energy and National Security Program Center for Strategic and
International Studies, March 16, 2004 (LNG the Growing Alternative Emergence of a US Market & the Role of
Qatar as an International LNG Hub)
The US is both an importer and exporter of LNG. LNG has been exported from Alaska to Japan for the past 30 years. While
Algeria has historically been the US’ largest supplier of LNG, in the past few years it has been overtaken by Trinidad and
Tobago, which now accounts for 2/3 of the nation’s LNG imports. In addition to imports from Trinidad and Tobago and
Algeria, the US also receives LNG cargoes from Brunei, Malaysia, Nigeria, Oman and Qatar. As a consequence of growing gas
demand, higher prices and limited supply options, renewed interest in US LNG imports has again surfaced. To date, more than
30 new LNG projects have been announced for North America with facilities proposed for a variety of sites along the east coast
from Nova Scotia to Florida, in the Bahamas, along the Gulf Coast from Alabama to Mexico and along the west coast from
Alaska to the Baja in Mexico.
35
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Jaeyoung Lee, P.E., Offshore Pipeline Consultant, “Natural Gas Demand in the USA - Why LNG & Gas Hydrate,” Published in KSEA
Letters, Vol. 33, No. 2, June 2005, www.jylpipeline.com/KSEA_article_2005.pdf
Gas production in the United States has leveled off and is expected to decline in the coming years. Approximately 15% of
natural gas used in the USA is imported from Canada. However, the supply piped in from Canada will be reduced due to the
increase in Canada’s domestic demand and declined gas production. To meet the future natural gas demand in the USA, two
solutions are suggested; Increase LNG import and develop a new energy source such as gas hydrate.
US demand for natural gas is high now and LNG is coming now
Jaeyoung Lee, P.E., Offshore Pipeline Consultant, “Natural Gas Demand in the USA - Why LNG & Gas Hydrate,” Published in KSEA
Letters, Vol. 33, No. 2, June 2005, www.jylpipeline.com/KSEA_article_2005.pdf
Natural gas demand was boosted by the 1980s’ oil shock and has continued to grow. This growth is due to the clear environmental
advantage of natural gas over other fossil fuels and its superior thermal efficiency. Now, approximately 25% of energy used in the
United States is supplied by natural gas. Texas alone uses more natural gas than the combined countries of England and Japan
[1]. Natural gas is used by the industry (40%), residential (22%, for heating, cooling, and cooking), business sector (15%), and
electricity generation plant (14%). It is also used as a raw material to make paint, plastics, fertilizer, steel, fabrics, glass, etc.
Natural gas demand will grow by more than 38% by 2025 [2]. One projection suggests that the United States could face a gap in
natural gas supply of approximately 5 trillion cubic feet (tcf=1012cubic feet) in 2020 [3]. This means that approximately 41.7 million
US homes will not receive natural gas since the average home in Houston uses about 120,000 cubic feet of natural gas per year.
To fill the gap between the natural gas demand and supply, the investment on LNG (Liquefied Natural gas) value chain and
research on gas hydrates are recommended.
36
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
37
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Jon Hurdle, a freelance writer who has written for many business publications, 7/14/08, “Pa. invites bids for leases on possible gas
field,” Reuters, http://uk.reuters.com/article/oilRpt/idUKN1447555220080714
Pennsylvania officials on Monday invited bids to lease land atop a geological formation that may hold enough natural gas to
meet total U.S. demand for two years.
The state's Department of Conservation and Natural Resources said it will hold a lease sale from pre-qualified bidders for 18 tracts of
state forest totaling some 74,000 acres in two north-central Pennsylvania counties. The bidding will be open until Sept. 2.
The tracts sit over the Marcellus Shale formation, a natural feature about a mile deep that has been known about for years but
which has only recently been suspected of containing massive quantities of natural gas.
The formation, which stretches some 600 miles between western New York State and West Virginia, could contain as much as 50
trillion cubic feet of recoverable natural gas, or enough to supply the entire U.S. for two years, at a wellhead value of $1 trillion,
according to website geology.com.
The recoverable quantity may represent about a tenth of the total gas in the formation, some scientists believe.
The estimates came from Pennsylvania State University geoscience professor Terry Englander and New York State University geology
professor Gary Lash, the website said.
"Given the enormity of the nation's energy demand, making less than an addition 4 percent of our state forest available for
drilling is a reasonable decision that protects our forest ecosystem and helps meet energy demands," DCNR Secretary Michael
DiBerardinis said in a statement.
"This lease sale responds to increased interest in the Marcellus Shale formation, a deep resource thought to contain large
quantities of natural gas," the department's statement said. It noted that new technology and increased natural gas prices have
made it possible to recover hard-to-reach fuel.
Demand low now – BC reserves are massive and recently tapped into
NORVAL SCOTT, correspondent of Dow Jones Newswires, 7/15/08, Reportonbuisiness.com, “With prices high, B.C. gas is hot,”
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20080715.RSHELLBC15/TPStory/Business
While B.C. contains huge amounts of natural gas, those assets are mostly locked in tight formations of shale rock that prevent the
gas from flowing freely into wells. Recent technological breakthroughs allow the shale to be fractured more easily, enabling the
gas to be extracted
As a result, companies such as Duvernay, which holds tracts of land in the Montney that could contain over one trillion cubic
feet of gas, have seen their share price double over the past twelve months. Montney is estimated to hold 50 trillion cubic feet of
reserves - more than in all of Alberta.
While Duvernay was keen to continue developing its assets and wasn't looking to sell, Shell approached the
company in July with its offer and negotiations proceeded smoothly from that point, Duvernay CEO Mr. Rose
said in an interview. "Shell were really interested in us."
38
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
GENERAL LINKS/INTERNALS
This section contains general links arguments for the rest of the file.
Links and internals for specific disadvantages are in that section of the file.
39
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Business Wire, 3-7-07, “Renewable Energy Emerging as Viable Utility Hedge Strategy, Reports Energy
Insights”, http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_2007_March_7/ai_n27289358, [Crystal Xia]
A recent analysis published by research and advisory firm Energy Insights finds that pronounced natural gas price volatility and
greenhouse gas (GHG) policy evolution are legitimizing the acquisition of renewable energy (RE) as a viable utility economic
hedge strategy. The report, entitled Renewable Energy as a Utility Hedge Strategy (doc # EI205166), contends that RE
resources are increasingly offering utilities the means to shield themselves from possible financial losses caused by erratic
fossil fuel prices and, in some cases, supply interruptions.
Renewable resources, especially wind energy, would act as a hedge against the natural gas industry.
David Berry, member of the Energy Project, 11-21-03, “Renewable energy as a natural gas price hedge: the
case of wind”, Energy Policy 33, ScienceDirect [Crystal Xia]
As the cost of electricity generated from renewable resources falls, that electricity becomes competitive with electricity generated
from fossil fuels. One way in which renewable energy competes is as a hedge against natural gas price volatility and natural
gas price increases in the electric industry. Wind advocates such as the American Wind Energy Association (2003b) have argued
that wind energy can be used as a substitute for natural gas and that wind energy has a predictable price in contrast to
natural gas. This paper evaluates the hedge value of wind energy given unstable or rising natural gas prices and evaluates the
conditions under which wind energy is likely to be a beneficial hedge. Since the mid-1990s there has been increasing discussion
by the electric industry, regulators, and government agencies of hedging natural gas prices with renewable energy. For
example, Serchuk and Means (1997) stated that renewable energy has the advantage of removing price volatility in energy bills
and Hoff (1997) analyzed the value of eliminating fuel price uncertainty that might be achieved by substituting renewable energy
for conventional energy by evaluating the cost of a long-term fixed price fuel contract. Lehr et al. (2001) described the factors
affecting the Colorado Public Utility Commission's decision to require a Colorado utility to acquire wind resources. One of the
important factors in the Commission's decision was the price of natural gas and the point at which wind energy becomes the
cheaper alternative for that specific utility; $3.50 per MCF ($3.24 per GJ) in that particular case. The applicability of wind energy
as a price hedge depends on institutional and site specific conditions which can vary greatly within the United States and among
nations. For example, the United States has a federal production tax credit and state and local incentives that result in lower prices
for wind energy (Bird et al., 2003). Similar incentives may not exist elsewhere, thereby reducing the benefits of a wind hedge. In
addition, the conventional energy costs which can be avoided by acquisition of wind resources depend on how natural gas and
other fuels are used in the mix of generation. Some utilities may rely on natural gas for baseload generation and others may use
natural gas only for intermediate and peaking purposes, for example. This paper assumes a pattern of fuel usage typical of the
American Southwest, where natural gas is used in generators serving intermediate and peak loads while coal and nuclear
resources are typically used for baseload generation. These characteristics may not be applicable in other regions. Section 2
reviews natural gas price behavior. The next sections discuss how wind energy could be used as a physical hedge and present the
costs of wind energy. Then I analyze the conventional energy generation costs which can be avoided by acquisition of wind
energy resources under three natural gas price scenarios for a hypothetical Southwestern US utility when a moderate size
(150 MW) wind project is deployed. The results indicate that wind energy can be a cost effective hedge against natural gas
price variability and against natural gas price increases under reasonable assumptions about wind costs, costs of generating
electricity with fossil fuels, and possible future prices of natural gas. In Section 7, I examine some of the conditions under which
wind energy would be an effective hedge against natural gas price volatility.
40
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
41
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
42
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
R. Neal Elliot, Anna Monis Shipley, Steven Nadel, and Elizabeth Brown, @ American Council for an Energy-
Efficient Economy, 12-03, “Natural gas price effects of energy efficiency and renewable energy practices and
policies”, pg. 28, http://www.aceee.org/pubs/e032full.pdf, [Crystal Xia]
Wall Street Journal. 04/18/08. “Surge in Natural-Gas Price Stoked by New Global Trade.”
[Takumi Murayama]
In a twist, the effort to build alternative-energy projects like solar arrays and wind farms also boosts construction of
gas-fired plants. Because wind is unpredictable, it's often necessary to build back-up generators, and gas-fired plants have an
advantage in that they can be started up relatively quickly, says Doug Kimmelman, senior partner with Energy Capital Partners,
a private-equity firm focused on the power sector.
In addition, regulatory approval and construction times are shorter for gas plants than coal or nuclear. For reasons like these,
new gas-fired power plants continue to be built or planned
43
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Ryan Wiser, Mark Bolinger, Matt St. Clair, Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, January
2005, <<http://www.osti.gov/energycitations/servlets/purl/838985-WxPCpP/native/838985.PDF>>
*[Paraphrased: One acronym expanded for clarity].
Renewable energy (RE) and energy efficiency (EE) have historically been supported because of their perceived economic,
environmental, economic-development, and national-security benefits.
Recently, extreme price volatility in wholesale electricity and natural gas markets has led to discussions about the potential risk
mitigation value of these clean energy resources. Deepening concerns about the ability of conventional North American gas
production to keep up with demand have also resulted in a growing number of voices calling for resource diversification (see,
e.g., Bernstein, Holtberg, & Ortiz 2002; Henning, Sloan & de Leon 2003; NARUC 2003; NPC 2003a).
R[enewable] E[energy]* and EE are a direct hedge against volatile and escalating gas prices because they reduce the need to
purchase variable-price natural gas-fired electricity generation, replacing that generation with fixed-price RE or EE resources
(see, e.g., Bolinger, Wiser, & Golove 2003; Awerbuch 2003). In addition to this direct contribution to price stability, by
displacing marginal gas-fired generation, RE and EE can reduce demand for natural gas and thus indirectly place downward
pressure on gas prices.3
Many recent modeling studies of increased RE and EE deployment have demonstrated that this “secondary” effect of putting
downward pressure on natural gas prices could be significant, with the consumer benefits from reduced gas prices in many
cases more than offsetting any increase in electricity costs caused by RE and/or EE deployment. As a result, this price effect is
increasingly cited as justification for policies promoting RE and EE. Yet, to date, little work has focused on reviewing the
reasonableness of this effect as it is portrayed in various studies, nor have studies attempted to benchmark that output against
economic theory. This paper is a first attempt to address these two issues.
44
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Union of Concerned Scientists, 8-26-05, “Renewable Energy Can Help Ease Natural Gas Crunch”,
http://www.ucsusa.org/clean_energy/clean_energy_policies/renewable-energy-can-help-ease-natural-gas-
crunch.html, [Crystal Xia]
Because increased renewable energy use reduces the demand for natural gas, and creates new competitors to traditional
power plants, increasing renewable energy would reduce natural gas prices. Achieving the 10 percent RES could reduce
gas prices by 1.9 percent ($0.12 per million Btu) compared to business as usual in 2020. A 20 percent standard could reduce
natural gas prices by as much as $0.25/million Btu, resulting in cumulative gas bill savings of $15 billion (Fig. 5) through
2025. Under current EIA forecasts, renewable energy begins to displace new coal-fired power plants (which become
economically competitive) instead of natural gas facilities after 2020. As a result, renewable energy has less of an impact on
natural gas prices in these later years, but it continues to provide total energy bill savings to consumers from lower electricity
prices, and even greater air pollution reduction benefits.
45
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Peter Urban, Connecticut Post staff writer, 7-19-2008, “Delegation Fighting Offshore Drilling,” [Connecticut
Post]. << http://www.connpost.com/localnews/ci_9928346>>
Pickens launched a media campaign last week to promote his plan to break America's addiction to foreign oil through a combination
of more domestic drilling, conservation, nuclear power and renewable energy sources.
"We currently use natural gas to produce 22 percent of our electricity. Harnessing the power of wind to generate electricity will give us
the flexibility to shift natural gas away from electricity generation and put it to use as a transportation fuel — reducing our dependence
on foreign oil by more than one-third," Pickens says.
Shays has also introduced a comprehensive bipartisan energy reform bill, H.R.1945, that would: improve fuel efficiency of passenger
vehicles, offer incentives to purchase energy-efficient appliances, and repeal tax breaks for industries, offer incentives for the purchase
of energy-efficient appliances and encourage transit-oriented development corridors in urban areas. Lieberman has co-sponsored
similar legislation (S.1554) in the Senate.
Shays has also introduced a bill, H.R. 6495, that would provide tax incentives for commuters to carpool, ride public transit, bicycle or
telecommute.
46
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Nuclear energy will tradeoff with natural gas as taxes and penalties on burning fossil-fuels increase.
Kevin Spear, Sentinel Staff Writer, 7-18-2008, “Orlando Utility Commission customers should get ready for
bigger bills,” [Orlando Sentinel]. [MM]
<<http://www.orlandosentinel.com/community/news/ucf/orl-ouc1808jul18,0,5537378.story>>
OUC is negotiating to buy a big enough slice of the new plants to serve a total of 90,000 homes.
Also in OUC's long-range planning is spending about $500 million on renewable energy, including solar power, bio-fuels and methane
gas produced by rotting garbage at Orange County's landfill.
Utility executives see the nuclear and clean-energy options as the best responses to a future likely to bring more price increases in coal
and natural gas and a tax or penalty on burning fossil fuels that contribute to global warming.
Ronnie Dubs, St. Petersburg Times Staff writer, 5-21-2008, St. Petersburg Times, “We will need power from
nuclear plants,” St. Petersburg, Florida, [LexisNexis Academic].
The Florida Public Service Commission should approve the construction of the nuclear plant proposed by Progress Energy. The
case can be made that the situation is really different this time around and the PSC should approve this additional capacity in the
face of an economic downturn. It is hard to argue with slower growth projections, but we should consider the following
scenarios:
The first thing we need to seriously consider is the avoidance of new power generation capacity using natural gas. Although
natural gas is the energy resource of choice for new power generation plants, we are now facing a downturn in domestic natural
gas production capacity. Energy companies are drilling more holes than ever but they have been unable to increase domestic
production of natural gas for a number of years. The addition of nuclear power plants will mitigate our dependence on costly
domestic natural gas and imported LNG to replace domestic production.
The second strategic issue of alternate energy for transportation is very important for utility companies. The most compelling
business case for cheaper transportation is the battery-operated automobile for commuting short distances. These new cars are
designed for short commutes of less than 100 miles and they will require a battery charge-up after every trip. This demand is not
yet quantified, but significant progress will be made in the next 10 years, the time it will take to complete a nuclear power plant.
The long-term nature of nuclear power plant development will allow us time to recover from a routine economic downturn and
allow us to plan for new forms of transportation. I recommend that we add this nuclear capacity to avoid further commitment to
natural gas at higher prices and to provide the added capacity for alternative energy platforms based on electricity. We should all
think long-term and take control of our future by supporting Progress Energy's project in Levy County.
47
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Sarah Lovanoza, (MBA in Sustainable Management) Staff writer Clean Technica, 3-27-2008, [Clean Technica].
<<http://cleantechnica.com/2008/03/27/solar-thermal-electricity-can-it-replace-coal-gas-and-oil/>>
[MM]
One of the most common arguments against large-scale use of renewable energy is that it cannot produce a steady, reliable stream of
energy, day and night. Ausra Inc. does not agree. They believe that solar thermal technology can supply over 90% of grid power, while
reducing carbon emissions.
“The U.S. could nearly eliminate our dependence on coal, oil and gas for electricity and transportation, drastically slashing global
warming pollution without increasing costs for energy,” said David Mills, chief scientific officer and founder of Ausra.
You may be wondering, how will we have electricity at night or during cloudy weather?
Will we use large banks of batteries or burn candles?
The ability to utilize solar thermal technology after the sun sets is made possible by a storage system that is up to 93% efficient,
according to Ausra’s executive vice president John O’Donnell.
High efficiency is achieved because solar thermal plants do not need to convert energy to another form in order to store it and do not
rely on battery technology. Flat moving reflectors or parabolic mirrors focus solar energy to generate heat. This heat generates steam
that turns turbines, thus generating an electric current.
48
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Booz & Company, leading global management consulting firm. 06/23/08. “The Emerging Global Gas Market.”
[Takumi Murayama]
That is one of the conclusions of a comprehensive new analysis of global gas markets by a Booz & Company team of energy
experts. The authors find that current projections of future U.S. energy consumption fail to take into account the impact of any
new system to manage CO2 emissions. A so-called cap-and-trade regime, in which power producers would be forced to pay
for CO2 emissions, could precipitate greatly increased demand for natural gas at the expense of dirtier fuels such as coal.
Although nuclear power remains a long-term option, the lead-time on the installation of new nuclear plants will mean natural
gas is the only viable alternative in the short to medium term.
In turn, greater U.S. gas consumption could upset the current delicate balance of demand and supply in international
markets, placing greater pressure on Europe to expand its efforts to secure long-term gas supply agreements with countries
such as Russia. Heightened U.S.-Europe competition could also mark the end of today’s independent regional markets—where
demand is more or less fully satisfied by local supply—and the rise of markets that are much more global and interdependent.
The Middle East currently accounts for about two-fifths of global gas reserves, and its role as a central player is unlikely to
diminish in the years ahead. Iran, by itself, has 15.5 percent of the global total, and Qatar enjoys 14 percent. The region is
likely to continue to supply markets in Europe and the U.S., but there are a number of circumstances under which supplies
could be limited or disrupted: if gas is used increasingly for oil production, if oil-associated gas is constrained by OPEC
production quotas, or if political instability increases. No less significantly, ongoing economic growth in the Middle East
could lead to increased demand from power production facilities and from industries such as petrochemicals and fertilizers.
The report finds that falling Middle East supplies could be offset by other sources—by Nigerian liquified natural gas (LNG), in
Europe’s case, or by Latin American supplies, in the case of the U.S. But the impact of reduced Middle East supplies could
be momentous if combined with greatly increased U.S. demand.
That scenario seems likely if a new administration introduces legislation that has the effect of raising the cost of carbon
emissions. Assuming a carbon regime partway between the most and least stringent currently envisaged by U.S. lawmakers, the
report predicts that the U.S. would need up to 84 bcm more natural gas by 2015 or 12 percent of OECD Europe demand. That
additional demand could be met by marginal suppliers such as Nigeria, Trinidad and Tobago, Egypt, and Algeria—but would
eat into volumes currently bound for Europe.
More gas competition between the U.S. and Europe would increase pressure on Europe’s existing relationships with Russia,
Algeria, and Norway and make new supply routes, including those with the Caspian region, that much more vital. Greater
competition would also lead to more connectivity between U.S. and European markets, upward price pressure, and higher
volatility on short-term markets and energy exchanges. The U.S., meanwhile, would need to further diversify its energy
portfolio—for example, by looking to suppliers in West and North Africa.
Elliott H. Gue, Editor of Energy Letter. 01/20/06. “The Great Gas Shortage.” [Takumi Murayama]
There are two implications of the global gas crunch. One, natural gas is fast becoming, like oil already is, a globally traded
commodity. Gone are the days when a region such as North America or Europe could look at natural gas as a domestic market.
This means that India, China, Europe and the US will be competing for the same global supplies of gas. This spells higher
prices and will be a boon to companies (or countries) with large reserves of gas for export.
49
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
René Snijder, Energy consultant, lecturer at the Energy Delta Institute in The Netherlands, member of the gas group of the
Clingendael Institute and member of IGU committee B (Strategy and Regulation), with over 30 years experience in the natural gas
industry, working for the NV Nederlandse Gasunie and two years for Shell, 3/11/2008 “The Future of Gas and the Role of LNG:
Economic and Geopolitical Implications,” Real Instituto Elcano,
http://209.85.215.104/search?q=cache:L5jbxi17HZQJ:www.realinstitutoelcano.org/wps/wcm/connect/resources/file/eb876d0ad931a07
/WP14-
2008_Snijder_Gas_LNG_Economic_Geopolitical_Implications.pdf%3FMOD%3DAJPERES%26attachment%3Dtrue+Indonesia+LN
G+economy&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=45&gl=us&client=firefox-a A global gas market is indeed emerging, particularly as a result of
the growing LNG trade across the Atlantic Basin and the increasingly feasible possibility for LNG supplies to choose between
market destinations in Asia, the US (both East and West Coasts) and the EU. Cost reduction and arbitrage potential are the main
drivers for the emerging global gas market, given that prices in the three principal consumer regions are influenced by cargoes taking
advantage of the arbitrage possibilities. Furthermore, investment in Russia no longer looks solely to the EU as the only potential
market outlet. Pipelined gas to China or LNG production for export to the US are seriously being considered as alternative
options for Russian gas. Norway is expected to deliver its first load of LNG to the US in early 2008.
50
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
51
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Energy Information Administration, 7-10-08, “What is liquefied natural gas (LNG) and how is it becoming
an energy source for the United States?”, http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/energy_in_brief
/liquefied_natural_gas_lng.cfm, [Crystal Xia]
LNG imports to the United States were generally not competitive with domestic supplies of natural gas and pipeline imports
from Canada through the 1980s and 1990s, resulting in low levels of these imports during these decades. However, higher
natural gas prices in the United States in recent years have attracted larger volumes of LNG imports to this country,
including a record U.S. total in 2007 equaling 771 billion cubic feet (Bcf) of natural gas in gaseous form.1 Projected growth in
the demand for LNG has resulted in companies adding LNG receiving capacity in the United States. Five LNG import
terminals currently operate in the United States. All but one of these has recently expanded. In addition, EIA expects at least four
new terminals to be operational in the next two years, more than doubling import capacity from 4.7 Bcf per day at the end of 2006
to over 11 Bcf per day at the end of 2008. This increase in LNG receiving capacity provides the potential for growing U.S.
LNG imports in coming years, and EIA projects imports of more than 1 trillion cubic feet of LNG by the end of this decade (see
figure, "LNG and Pipeline Import Projection").
Natural gas demand is key to the use and the development of LNG.
Business Wire, 8-5-07, “In Last Two Decades, LNG Demand Has Experienced 7.7% Annual Growth Spurred
by Strong Imports by European Markets”, http://findarticles.com/p/articles
/mi_m0EIN/is_2007_Oct_5/ai_n27398314, [Crystal Xia]
Natural gas has come a long way from being flared up as a byproduct to a serious
alternative to oil and coal. Continued market growth in all major regions worldwide has driven the demand for natural gas
production, which reached almost three trillion cubic meters (tcm) in 2006. With new discoveries in Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan
and China, the natural gas reserves have shown upward trend reaching 6.2 tcf. The future market share of natural gas is all set
to grow from the current share of 21% driven by the strong demand in Europe and emerging economies in Asia like India and
China. In the absence of pipeline infrastructure, most of this demand has to be fulfilled by liquefying gas and supplying it as
liquefied natural gas or LNG.
52
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
53
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Progress Energy, St. Petersburg, Florida, 7-15-2008, “Progress Energy gets approval to take next step to secure
Florida’s energy future.” <<http://www.progressenergy.com/aboutus/news/article.asp?id=19062>>
[MM]
The estimated average annual customer cost increase is expected to be between 3 percent and 4 percent from 2009 to 2018. When the
plants begin commercial operation in 2016-17, fuel savings -- a direct cost savings benefit to customers -- is estimated to be
approximately $1 billion a year. The prices of oil, natural gas and other fossil fuels have risen dramatically in the last couple of years
and continue to be highly volatile.
Despite what is expected to be a short-term economic downturn, Progress Energy Florida's service area remains one of the fastest-
growing regions in the country. As the fourth-largest state, Florida ranks third nationally in per-capita energy consumption. Over the
past three decades, the size of the average home has grown by 50 percent and uses 30 percent more electricity. Since the Crystal River
nuclear plant came online in the mid-1970s, the company's customer base has more than doubled.
Fuel diversity is important to ensure a reliable, stable supply of electricity for customers. Progress Energy Florida has the most diverse
fuel mix of any utility in the state, and is committed to a balanced mix of power generation alternatives, including natural gas, coal,
oil, nuclear and renewable sources. This is the best way to continue to ensure a safe, reliable and economical source of electricity.
Nuclear power is one of three critical components of Progress Energy Florida's balanced solution to meet its customers' energy needs
over the long term, which also includes the use of renewable energy sources, and one of the nation's best energy-efficiency programs.
54
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
CANADA
55
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
SHELL – CANADA
A. Natural gas demand is increasing.
Sophia Ruester and Anne Neumann, Department of Business and Economics, Dresden University of
Technology, Chair of Energy Economics and Public Sector Management, 6-13-08, “The prospects for liquefied
natural gas development in the US”, Science Direct, [Crystal Xia]
Due to supply security and environmental concerns, natural gas demand is increasing at a rate above average primary energy
demand. Total US natural gas consumption is expected to increase from 21.9 to 23.4 tcf in 2030 for the reference case with
regional differences in growth rates (EIA, 2008). About 26% of the natural gas is used as fuel in the power generation sector
(primarily for utilities and independent power producers), 12% is used in the transportation sector, 26% in the industrial sector,
and 22% and 14% by residential and commercial users respectively. There are about 500 electric utilities, 40,000 industrial
consumers, 4.5 million commercial consumers, and 53 million residential consumers. Many of the larger industrial users have
installed dual-fuel equipment, allowing them to take advantage of prices and/or contracts for interruptible power.
56
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
SHELL – CANADA
C. Renewable energy trades off with natural gas – it discourages natural gas producers.
Ryan Wiser and Mark Bolinger, research scientists @ Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Concerns about the price and supply of natural gas in the US have grown in recent years, and futures and options markets predict
high prices and significant price volatility for the immediate future. Whether we are witnessing the beginning of a major long-
term nationwide crisis or a costly but shorter-term supply demand adjustment remains to be seen. Results presented in this article
suggest that resource diversification, in particular increased investments in renewable energy, could help alleviate the threat
of high gas prices over the short and long term. By displacing gas-fired generation, increased deployment of renewable
energy is expected to reduce natural gas demand and consequently put downward pressure on gas prices. A review of the
economics literature shows that this secondary effect is to be expected and can be measured with the inverse price elasticity of
natural gas supply. Because of the respective shapes of long- and short-term supply curves, the long-term price response is
expected to be less significant than the shorter-term response. The effect of this natural gas price reduction may not entirely
represent an increase in aggregate economic wealth, and may in part reflect a benefit to natural gas consumers that comes at the
expense of natural gas producers. Conventional economics does not generally support government intervention for the sole
reason of shifting the demand curve for natural gas and thereby reducing gas prices. If policymakers are uniquely concerned about
the impact of gas prices on consumers, however, or are concerned about the potentially harmful macroeconomic impacts of higher
gas prices or on increasing imports of natural gas, then policies to reduce gas demand may be considered appropriate. It also
deserves note that this secondary gas-price-suppression form of risk mitigation is additional to the direct risk-reducing benefit of
replacing variable-priced natural gas with fixed-price renewable energy.
(Sultz James, 3-21-05 The Security of Continental Natural Gas Supply 3rd Cross-Border Forum on Energy
Issues, http://www.wilsoncenter.org /index.cfm?event_id=113225&fuseaction=events.event_summary)
Finally, James Slutz, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Oil and Natural Gas at the U.S. Department of Energy, concluded the
presentations on a more general note, reminding the audience that “energy is the cornerstone of a strong U.S.-Canada
relationship.” Slutz noted that demand for gas has increased during the last few years, especially as a source of power
generation. He said that there is not just one solution to the supply problem (Alaska gas), noting that coal seam gas, once
considered “unconventional,” is now really conventional and accounts for 9% of supply. He noted, too, that although the
United States imports considerable amounts of gas from Canada, its gas exports to Canada have increased considerably during
the last decade. He emphasized the increasing interdependence of both economies and recognized the need for further
dialogue in meeting North America’s demand for natural gas.
57
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
SHELL – CANADA
E) Canada is key to the war on terrorism
Maria Banda-Canadian Pugwash Group and Science for Peace Eric Fawcett Memorial
Forum Saturday, April 17, 2004 “Development of Canadian Policy in the Shadow of U.S.
Defence and Foreign Policy; Power of the Weak? Canada’s Diplomacy and the Bush
Doctrine” (http://www.pugwashgroup.ca/events/documents/2004/2004.04.17-
Banda_presentation.pdf)
American analysts are increasingly coming to recognize that the United States cannot win the War on Terror on its own.
Despite its astounding military budget, the U.S. is not self-sufficient. Why was Washington insisting on Canada’s
contribution in Iraq? Two reasons: Canada’s and its allies’ military contribution was critical to the coalition’s success;
and, international support garners domestic legitimacy for the Bush government. Even Robert Kagan observed that the
United States would otherwise face a crisis of legitimacy. Second, if allies are important in the military arm of the war on
terror, they are vital in the support activities: there are certain things that U.S. cannot do—or cannot do well. Americans know
how to bomb from high altitudes or win staggering military victories—but Afghanistan and Iraq have yet again confirmed that
they cannot adequately deal with the aftermath of war: peace-building and nation-building efforts—from training of police
forces and judicial reform to the creation of civil society. This has been the middle-powers’ métier, which President Bush’s
appeal for U.N.’s help in post-war reconstruction has confirmed.
58
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
SHELL – CANADA
F) Terrorism Risks Extinction
(Yonah Alexander 8/28/03 (; professor and director of the Inter-University for Terrorism Studies) “Terrorism
myths and realities” Washington Times l/n)
Last week's brutal suicide bombings in Baghdad and Jerusalem have once again illustrated dramatically that the international
community failed, thus far at least, to understand the magnitude and implications of the terrorist threats to the very
survival of civilization itself. Even the United States and Israel have for decades tended to regard terrorism as a mere tactical
nuisance or irritant rather than a critical strategic challenge to their national security concerns. It is not surprising, therefore,
that on September 11, 2001, Americans were stunned by the unprecedented tragedy of 19 al Qaeda terrorists striking a
devastating blow at the center of the nation's commercial and military powers. Likewise, Israel and its citizens, despite the
collapse of the Oslo Agreements of 1993 and numerous acts of terrorism triggered by the second intifada that began almost
three years ago, are still "shocked" by each suicide attack at a time of intensive diplomatic efforts to revive the moribund peace
process through the now revoked cease-fire arrangements [hudna]. Why are the United States and Israel, as well as scores of
other countries affected by the universal nightmare of modern terrorism surprised by new terrorist "surprises"? There are
many reasons, including misunderstanding of the manifold specific factors that contribute to terrorism's expansion, such as lack
of a universal definition of terrorism, the religionization of politics, double standards of morality, weak punishment of
terrorists, and the exploitation of the media by terrorist propaganda and psychological warfare. Unlike their historical
counterparts, contemporary terrorists have introduced a new scale of violence in terms of conventional and
unconventional threats and impact. The internationalization and brutalization of current and future terrorism make it
clear we have entered an Age of Super Terrorism [e.g. biological, chemical, radiological, nuclear and cyber] with its serious
implications concerning national, regional and global security concerns. Two myths in particular must be debunked
immediately if an effective counterterrorism "best practices" strategy can be developed [e.g., strengthening international
cooperation]. The first illusion is that terrorism can be greatly reduced, if not eliminated completely, provided the root causes
of conflicts - political, social and economic - are addressed. The conventional illusion is that terrorism must be justified by
oppressed people seeking to achieve their goals and consequently the argument advanced by "freedom fighters" anywhere,
"give me liberty and I will give you death," should be tolerated if not glorified. This traditional rationalization of "sacred"
violence often conceals that the real purpose of terrorist groups is to gain political power through the barrel of the gun, in
violation of fundamental human rights of the noncombatant segment of societies. For instance, Palestinians religious
movements [e.g., Hamas, Islamic Jihad] and secular entities [such as Fatah's Tanzim and Aqsa Martyr Brigades]] wish not only
to resolve national grievances [such as Jewish settlements, right of return, Jerusalem] but primarily to destroy the Jewish state.
Similarly, Osama bin Laden's international network not only opposes the presence of American military in the Arabian
Peninsula and Iraq, but its stated objective is to "unite all Muslims and establish a government that follows the rule of the
Caliphs." The second myth is that strong action against terrorist infrastructure [leaders, recruitment, funding, propaganda,
training, weapons, operational command and control] will only increase terrorism. The argument here is that law-enforcement
efforts and military retaliation inevitably will fuel more brutal acts of violent revenge. Clearly, if this perception continues to
prevail, particularly in democratic societies, there is the danger it will paralyze governments and thereby encourage further
terrorist attacks. In sum, past experience provides useful lessons for a realistic future strategy. The prudent application of force
has been demonstrated to be an effective tool for short- and long-term deterrence of terrorism. For example, Israel's targeted
killing of Mohammed Sider, the Hebron commander of the Islamic Jihad, defused a "ticking bomb." The assassination of
Ismail Abu Shanab - a top Hamas leader in the Gaza Strip who was directly responsible for several suicide bombings including
the latest bus attack in Jerusalem - disrupted potential terrorist operations. Similarly, the U.S. military operation in Iraq
eliminated Saddam Hussein's regime as a state sponsor of terror. Thus, it behooves those countries victimized by terrorism
to understand a cardinal message communicated by Winston Churchill to the House of Commons on May 13, 1940:
"Victory at all costs, victory in spite of terror, victory however long and hard the road may be: For without victory,
there is no survival."
59
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Links – Supplier
Global demand for natural gas is soaring and Canada’s the one providing it – shell deal proves
Bloomberg News, 7/14/08, “Shell has deal to buy natural gas producer,” http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/business/5887993.html
Royal Dutch Shell has agreed to acquire Duvernay Oil Corp. for $5.2 billion to expand gas production from hard-to-tap
formations in western Canada.
Duvernay shareholders will get $82.59 for each of their shares, a 42 percent premium over the closing price on Friday,
according to a statement Monday from Calgary-based Duvernay. Shell also will assume Duvernay's debt, which was over $500
million as of March 31, according to a company filing.
The premium "is quite substantial," said Dirk Hoozemans, who helps manage the equivalent of about $23.8 billion at
Rotterdam-based Robeco Group. "Probably Shell wanted to address its North American gas position with the acquisition."
Shell, in the year's biggest oil and gas deal, is paying the equivalent of about $9.10 per thousand cubic feet of proved
natural-gas reserves, according to Bloomberg data. That's more than double the price offered last month by XTO Energy in its
proposed $4 billion takeover of Hunt Petroleum Corp.
Duvernay produces the equivalent of more than 25,000 barrels of oil a day, consisting mostly of gas, and is developing so-
called tight-gas projects in rock formations in the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin, Shell said in a separate statement.
Daily output might reach 70,000 barrels by 2012, it said.
Shell and rivals are turning to such unconventional sources for gas to meet growing demand as prices soar. Canada is
the largest U.S. supplier of the heating and power-plant fuel.
Gas futures traded in New York have jumped 60 percent this year.
60
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Links – Supplier
Canada provides most of the US imports of natural gas
61
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
(United States Embassy Ottawa. 9-13-05, “Energy Secretary Hails Strong, Durable U.S.-Canada Partnership
Thanks Canada for aiding hurricane victims, cites bilateral trade ties”
http://canada.usembassy.gov/content/content.asp?section=can_usa&document=energy_091305)
The U.S. official said that Canada is the "leading supplier of imported oil, natural gas, uranium and electricity" to the
United States. At the same time, he explained, "our cross-border electricity trade flows in both directions, and our [energy]
systems are highly integrated." Because "neither of our nations can address its energy concerns alone," close cooperation is
essential, he said. Not surprising, said Bodman, the U.S. Department of Energy "has a very strong relationship" with its
Canadian counterpart -- Natural Resources Canada. "We meet regularly and are in constant communication at all levels
throughout our respective departments," he told his audience. "Both departments are committed to exploring ways to
expand cross-border infrastructure development and trade, and to ensuring the continued security of our integrated
systems." However, he cautioned that bilateral energy integration must expand into fully regional integration to meet the
challenges ahead. This is an important U.S. policy objective, said Bodman, because President Bush recognizes that "one of
the most important things we can do to promote the security, stability and reliability of the U.S. and Canadian energy
sectors is to develop a genuinely integrated North American energy market" that includes Mexico.
(Sultz James, 3-21-05 The Security of Continental Natural Gas Supply 3rd Cross-Border Forum on Energy
Issues, http://www.wilsoncenter.org /index.cfm?event_id=113225&fuseaction=events.event_summary)
Finally, James Slutz, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Oil and Natural Gas at the U.S. Department of Energy, concluded the
presentations on a more general note, reminding the audience that “energy is the cornerstone of a strong U.S.-Canada
relationship.” Slutz noted that demand for gas has increased during the last few years, especially as a source of power
generation. He said that there is not just one solution to the supply problem (Alaska gas), noting that coal seam gas, once
considered “unconventional,” is now really conventional and accounts for 9% of supply. He noted, too, that although the
United States imports considerable amounts of gas from Canada, its gas exports to Canada have increased considerably during
the last decade. He emphasized the increasing interdependence of both economies and recognized the need for further
dialogue in meeting North America’s demand for natural gas.
62
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Impacts – Relations
Canada is the US's largest supplier of natural gas, which is key to maintaining overall relations.
(Thomas A. Shannon and Sullivan, Daniel S., Assistant Secretary for Western Hemisphere Affairs and for
Economic, Energy, and Business Affairs (respectively), June 23, 08, Investor's Business Daily, Energy Answers
Await at Our Doorstep)
Canada is our single-largest energy supplier, providing 17% of U.S. oil imports. In 2007, Canada provided more petroleum
than the two next top suppliers. Canada is also our top supplier of natural gas (16% of total supply in 2006) and a major
supplier of electricity. Canada's mature democracy, open investment environment and strong rule of law make it an
exceptionally stable and reliable energy supplier. The annual Energy Consultative Mechanism meeting that U.S. and
Canadian officials convened on June 10 exemplifies the enduring strength and mutually beneficial nature of the U.S.-
Canadian economic and security relationship. During these meetings we discussed the potential impacts of U.S. energy
legislation on our continued energy relationship, as well as ways to facilitate the development of proposed pipelines to bring
Alaska's natural gas to the lower 48 states. According to current estimates, when oil sands are included, Canada's energy
reserves are second only to Saudi Arabia's, with a reported 179.2 billion barrels of proven oil resources. The bulk of these
reserves (over 95%) are oil sands deposits in the Canadian provinces of Alberta and Saskatchewan. Canada produces up to 2
million barrels of oil a day from the oil sands deposits, which have become vital to North American energy security. Canada
has also been working to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions from these deposits by using carbon capture technology
and through more efficient use of natural gas in production. Additionally, oil sands producers are now recycling 90% to
95% of the water used in production and have instituted aggressive land-reclamation programs. The Canadian province of
Alberta, where the majority of oil sands deposits are located, is the only jurisdiction in North America to legislate industrial
reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. They project that these and other measures will yield a 50% reduction in absolute
emissions over 2005 levels by 2050. But U.S.-Canadian ties go much deeper than energy. Canada is our top export market.
Since the signing of NAFTA in 1994, total trade between Canada and the United States has grown by 250%, U.S. employment
has increased by 25 million jobs, and U.S. manufacturing output has increased by 63%. At the North American Leaders'
Summit in New Orleans this April, President Bush, Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper and Mexican President Felipe
Calderon called on our governments to enhance cooperation to strengthen energy security and protect the environment. The
leaders agreed to enhance our electricity networks, increase vehicle fuel efficiency and develop clean energy technologies,
while noting steps already taken to harmonize energy efficiency standards for key products. In addition, the recently concluded
Energy Consultative Mechanism meetings led to an agreement between the U.S. and Canada to stay in close contact and to
establish a working group focusing on economic and environmental aspects of the world's largest bilateral energy relationship.
Ultimately, increasing U.S. energy security involves looking for new sources of oil, developing alternative energy sources
and improving energy efficiency through technology. But as energy challenges for the U.S. mount, it's reassuring to
know that part of the solution is found with our good neighbor, Canada.
63
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Impacts – Relations
The Canadian Prime Minister is committed to continuing massive sales of natural gas to the US in order
to preserve relations.
(The Globe and Mail, Canada, September 22, 06, Reclaiming Canada's Role as a World Player)
With two calculated speeches, Stephen Harper has articulated a blessedly coherent vision of Canada’s expanding international
role. At the Economic Club of New York, the Prime Minister spelled out what Canada brings to the United States, such as
energy security, and what it expects in return, including an assurance that security measures will not impede border
traffic. At the United Nations yesterday, he reminded his listeners of Canada’s role in the tough peacemaking mission in
Afghanistan - and then warned that the UN cannot defeat terrorism if it cannot reform itself. Emphasizing his message, Mr.
Harper told the Economic Club: “Make no mistake, Canada intends to be a player. It was an estimable performance. And it has
effectively countered charges that Mr. Harper has toadied to U.S. President George W. Bush, tailoring his policies to reflect
U.S. desires. The New York foray is his declaration of independence. No one, despite the discreet language of diplomacy, could
misunderstand his intention to put Canada’s interests in the forefront. First, Mr. Harper outlined what Canada can do for the
United States. Canada ranks fifth in total energy production. It is the largest supplier to the United States of oil, natural
gas, electricity and uranium. Those are formidable advantages in a neighbour that is “modern, democratic, prosperous, peace-
loving.” Or, as he reminded his prestigious Economic Club audience: “Canada is an emerging energy superpower, the only
stable and growing producer of this scarce commodity in an unstable world.” There are huge advantages for both nations in
deeper co-operation, as Mr. Harper noted. He wants to enhance the pragmatic North American Economic and Security
Partnership with Mexico and the United States. Canada-U.S. economic integration is already strong: More than $1.5-billion in
goods and services and 300,000 people cross the border each day. The Conservative government is also boosting border
security. And then came the hook, an emphatic reminder of how easily this mutual prosperity could founder. Under the Western
Hemisphere Travel Initiative, the United States will demand a passport or an equivalent secure document at its land borders
starting Jan. 1, 2008. That requirement is a recipe for chaos, if only because Washington has not yet determined what
technology it will use. “Let’s take the time to get it right,” Mr. Harper urged, asking his influential audience to pull strings. That
theme of co-operation for mutual benefit is woven throughout. Mr. Harper repeatedly stressed Canada’s contribution to the
battle against terrorism: Troops are on the ground in Afghanistan; Canada has earmarked nearly $1-billion in aid and
technical assistance. “Those two actions - rebuilding a shattered society and providing a stable security environment - go hand
in glove,” he told the UN General Assembly. “This is the United Nation’s strongest mission and, therefore, our greatest test. We
cannot afford to fail.” The UN, he added, must ensure that its failings do not hamper its earnest efforts. Then came the second
hook. Canada is doing its part abroad and it expects respect at home. And home includes the disputed waterways of the
Northwest Passage. “We will defend our sovereignty over all our territory, including over the islands, waterways and resources
of the High Arctic, even if that conflicts with American claims,” Mr. Harper said. Taken together, the two speeches constitute a
realistic approach to a formidable world. There is idealism. There is the tough calculation of the bottom line. And there is no
doubt that Canadian interests are central. Good.
64
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
65
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
66
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Impacts – Military
Canada and the US have a strong military relationship
(National Defense and the Canadian armed forces. July 27, 2006”Canada - United States Defence Relations”
http://www.forces.gc.ca/site/newsroom/view_news_e.asp?id=836)
Canadian and American forces have successfully operated together on numerous occasions over the past decade,
including combat operations. Canadian Forces’ ships, battle groups, fighter aircraft, patrol aircraft, and helicopters have
operated as integral units of US-led operations in the Persian Gulf, in Afghanistan, and closer to home. Our commitment to
Afghanistan and the US-led Operation Enduring Freedom continues to this day. Canadians and Americans under NORAD
command were the first military responders to the September 11th attacks. US and Canadian military personnel also
work together in varying levels of formal and informal cooperation in a wide range of smaller international operations.
Combined Training Each year, Canada and the United States routinely participate in many cooperative land, air, and sea
training exercises. These joint and combined training exercises play an important part of Canada-US defence cooperation by
ensuring interoperability and operational effectiveness, helping our forces to function together seamlessly, building on each
other's strengths to achieve objectives, while minimizing risks.
A Strong Relationship The Canada-US defence relationship remains solid. There are currently approximately 600 Canadian
Forces' personnel serving in the US, mostly in NORAD-related assignments. As well, Canadian government and industry
representatives conduct over 20,000 visits annually to the US related to defence activities. Both countries can build on this
legacy of successful cooperation and interoperability in order to continue to meet the needs of continental security and national
sovereignty.
67
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Impacts – Trade
The US and Canada have a major trade relationship.
68
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Impacts – WOT
Canada is key to winning the WOT
(Bill Janzen 7-02 “Canada's Iraq Policy since 1990” Mennonite Central Committee Peace Office Newsletter,
http://72.14.205.104/custom?q=cache:1109y8TyJXcJ:mcc.org/peace/pon/PON_200203.pdf+canada%27s+iraq+
policy+after+1990&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us&client=google-coop-np)
Canada's policy on Iraq is not radically different from that of the United States though, as in other cases, there are
somewhat stronger elements of multilateralism, "soft power," and humanitarianism, and, of course, Canada is a much
smaller player. In 1990 Canada supported the several U.N. Security Council (UNSC) resolutions and the subsequent
U.S.-led military action to push Iraq out of Kuwait. Canada also supported the 1991 resolutions to continue the sanctions
and to send in weapons inspectors, to press Iraq to dispose of its weapons of mass destruction. Canada has also demonstrated
some concern for the Iraqi people. Already in 1991 Foreign Affairs officials responded quickly to the requests from NGOs for
getting humanitarian shipments cleared. Canada also encouraged the development of the Oil for Food (OFF) program. In 1996
when Lloyd Axworthy, whose commitment to peace had led him to travel to Iraq in 1990, became Canada's Foreign Affairs
Minister, he hired Dr. Eric Hoskins as a personal advisor. Hoskins had been on the 1991 Harvard Study Team and had done a
lot to publicize the plight of the Iraqi people. Axworthy's interest was timely because, despite the OFF program and progress in
weapons inspection, interaction between Iraq and the U.S. was deteriorating. Late in 1998 the U.S. withdrew the inspectors and
started a bombing campaign with the U.K. Then, early in 1999, Canada started a two-year term on the UNSC. Canada now
proposed three U.N. study panels, to focus on the humanitarian needs, the weapons situation, and Kuwaiti prisoners of war and
related matters. Their reports helped in the long 1999 debate that culminated in UNSC Resolution 1284. This resolution
removed the oil ceiling, thereby enabling Iraq to import many more goods. It authorized list based approval to ease importation
of permissible goods. It called for a cash component so that some revenue from Iraq's oil exports would go to Iraq in cash,
albeit under U.N. monitoring, to help pay civil servants and teachers. And it made the weapons inspection commission
accountable to the U.N. Secretary General, rather than to the UNSC, restricting the influence of individual Council members.
Also, the inspectors would be more representative of the international community. Despite these positive signs, the new
resolution kept the basic concept that money from Iraq's oil sales, instead of going to Iraq, went into a U.N. account and was
then used to pay international suppliers of goods ordered by Iraq. This prevented Iraq from buying weapons, but it also
restricted its economic activity enormously! The cash component, meant to be an exception to this rule, was never
operationalized because, say officials, Iraq did not accept monitoring. The new resolution also continued to allow any member
of the sanctions committee, e.g., the U.S., to block a vast range of items on the ground of "dual use" suspicions including parts
for water treatment systems and medical, electrical, and communications equipment. It also kept the provision that 30 percent
of the revenue from Iraq's oil sales would be used to compensate parties, including big oil companies, for losses in the Gulf
War. Though later reduced to 25 percent, it is a shocking amount given the needs of the Iraqi people. After this resolution was
passed Canadian officials tried to strengthen its positive elements, particularly the list?based approval system, in part because,
early in 2000, a Canadian Parliamentary committee recommended, unanimously, that nonmilitary sanctions be lifted. Also,
Axworthy funded The Sanctions Decade, a 275-page study by the International Peace Academy, to have the Security Council
look more self?critically at the use of sanctions generally. Canada also continued to make diplomatic visits to Iraq. And it
provided some funding for UNICEF, the Red Cross/Red Crescent, and some NGOs, while saying that the Iraqi government
could do much more to help its people. Canada also continued its diplomatic support for U.S. actions, including the
bombing, and used its naval forces to assist in restricting Iraq's efforts to bypass the sanctions. Canadian officials argue
that an "unfettered Iraq" would pose a danger to its neighbors and that despite their concern for the people of Iraq, constraints
on its government are needed. For this reason they also support the new "smart sanctions." They favor regional disarmament
but say that Iraq must do more first.
69
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
CANADA AFF
70
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
2AC – CANADA
1) Non-unique Demand satisfied now
Jon Hurdle, a freelance writer who has written for many business publications, 7/14/08, “Pa. invites bids for leases on possible gas
field,” Reuters, http://uk.reuters.com/article/oilRpt/idUKN1447555220080714
Pennsylvania officials on Monday invited bids to lease land atop a geological formation that may hold enough natural gas
to meet total U.S. demand for two years.
The state's Department of Conservation and Natural Resources said it will hold a lease sale from pre-qualified bidders for 18 tracts
of state forest totaling some 74,000 acres in two north-central Pennsylvania counties. The bidding will be open until Sept. 2.
The tracts sit over the Marcellus Shale formation, a natural feature about a mile deep that has been known about for years
but which has only recently been suspected of containing massive quantities of natural gas.
The formation, which stretches some 600 miles between western New York State and West Virginia, could contain as much as 50
trillion cubic feet of recoverable natural gas, or enough to supply the entire U.S. for two years, at a wellhead value of $1 trillion,
according to website geology.com.
The recoverable quantity may represent about a tenth of the total gas in the formation, some scientists believe.
The estimates came from Pennsylvania State University geoscience professor Terry Englander and New York State University
geology professor Gary Lash, the website said.
"Given the enormity of the nation's energy demand, making less than an addition 4 percent of our state forest available for
drilling is a reasonable decision that protects our forest ecosystem and helps meet energy demands," DCNR Secretary
Michael DiBerardinis said in a statement.
"This lease sale responds to increased interest in the Marcellus Shale formation, a deep resource thought to contain large
quantities of natural gas," the department's statement said. It noted that new technology and increased natural gas prices
have made it possible to recover hard-to-reach fuel.
4) Canadian production would not decrease because of the NAFTA proportionality clause
5) Canada would stop development of the non-economical northern tar pits in reponse to a decrease in
demand
71
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
LNG SAFETY DA
72
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
73
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
D. Unsafe LNG risks pool fires, explosions, freezes, and terrorist attacks.
Paul W. Parfomak and Aaron Flynn. 1/28/04 (Import Terminals: Siting, Safety, and Regulation, RL32205) [S.
Page]
Natural gas is combustible, so an uncontrolled release of LNG poses a hazard of fire or, in confined spaces, explosion. LNG also
poses hazards because it is so cold. The likelihood and severity of catastrophic LNG events have been the subject of controversy.
While questions remain about the credible impacts of specific LNG hazards, there appears to be consensus as to what the most
serious hazards are. Pool Fires. If LNG spills near an ignition source, the evaporating gas in a combustible gas-air concentration
will burn above the LNG pool. The resulting “pool fire” would spread as the LNG pool expanded away from its source and
continued evaporating. A pool fire is intense, burning far more hotly and rapidly than oil or gasoline fires. It cannot be extinguished
— all the LNG must be consumed before it goes out. Because an LNG pool fire is so hot, its thermal radiation may injure people
and damage property a considerable distance from the fire itself. Many experts agree that a large pool fire, especially on water (due
to heat transfer), is the most serious LNG hazard. Other Safety Hazards. LNG spilled on water could (theoretically) regasify almost
instantly in a “flameless explosion,” but an Idaho National Engineering Laboratory report concluded that “transitions caused by
mixing of LNG and water are not violent.” LNG vapor clouds are not toxic, but they could cause asphyxiation by displacing
breathable air. Such clouds rise in air as they warm, however, diminishing the threat to people on the ground. Extremely cold LNG
could injure people or damage equipment through direct contact. The extent of such contact would likely be limited, however, as a
major spill would likely result in a more serious fire. The environmental damage associated with an LNG spill would be confined
to fire and freezing impacts near the spill since LNG dissipates completely Terrorism Hazards. LNG tankers and land-based
facilities could be vulnerable to terrorism. Tankers might be physically attacked in a variety of ways to destroy their cargo— or
commandeered for use as weapons against coastal targets. LNG terminal facilities might also be physically attacked with
explosives or through other means. Some LNG facilities may also be indirectly disrupted by “cyber-attacks” or attacks on regional
electricity grids and communications networks which could in turn affect dependent LNG control and safety systems.
74
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Consumers facing high home heating bills due to natural gas prices that last week reached a record might wish Frederick were
even busier. Once global gas trading becomes more commonplace, U.S. natural gas prices should sink. The large arms at left
transfer 50,000 gallons per minute of LNG from ship to shore at Cove Point, Md. "As we're able to bring more supply into this
country ... prices will, in fact, be lower," says Stacy Nieuwoudt, an analyst at Pickering Energy Partners in Houston. As the
gap widens between surging demand for natural gas and plateauing production from domestic wells, the scene at Cove Point
will be repeated around the USA. Imports of liquefied natural gas, or LNG, are expected to rise from about 1% of total gas
usage in 2002 to 15% by 2015 and 21% by 2025, according to the Energy Information Administration (EIA). That year, total
imports are expected to be almost seven times the current figure.
75
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
76
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
77
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
78
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
79
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
80
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
81
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
82
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
83
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
84
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
But even if those regulations were vastly simplified and LNG imports were accelerated, even if natural gas plants began to
displace ever more coal plants and air quality continued to improve, there would still be an irrefutably ominous aspect of this
new global gas business: national security. "What makes LNG perhaps least attractive is the risk of terrorism or accident,"
said Amory Lovins, CEO of the Rocky Mountain Institute. "One thousand-foot LNG marine tanker being hit by a [missile]
would be a megaton range firestorm. It's not something you want anywhere near a city."
85
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
However, at a Cleveland storage facility in 1944, a dike failure leaked liquefied natural gas into the streets and storm
sewers, causing an explosion that killed nearly 130 people. At the Cove Point facility in Lusby in 1979, a pump seal failed
and the gas vapors were ignited by a worker switching off the circuit breaker, killing him and leaving part of the building
in ruins. Liquefied natural gas is natural gas that is cooled to nearly 300 degrees below zero and is less dense than water, because
the change in state reduces its volume 600 times, making it more economical to transport. Since the September 11 terrorist
attacks, the departments of Transportation and Homeland Security have joint responsibility for LNG terminals, which
some critics say pose security threats to nearby communities.
86
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
87
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
2. No tradeoff – Natural gas demand for heading will be filled by LNG even if energy demands are not.
5. Domestic safety reform doesn’t solve – their evidence assumes ships are hijacked internationally.
88
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
LNG ECONOMY DA
89
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Ryan Wiser, Mark Bolinger, Matt St. Clair, Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, January
2005, <<http://www.osti.gov/energycitations/servlets/purl/838985-WxPCpP/native/838985.PDF>>
*[Paraphrased: One acronym expanded for clarity].
Renewable energy (RE) and energy efficiency (EE) have historically been supported because of their perceived economic,
environmental, economic-development, and national-security benefits.
Recently, extreme price volatility in wholesale electricity and natural gas markets has led to discussions about the potential risk
mitigation value of these clean energy resources. Deepening concerns about the ability of conventional North American gas
production to keep up with demand have also resulted in a growing number of voices calling for resource diversification (see,
e.g., Bernstein, Holtberg, & Ortiz 2002; Henning, Sloan & de Leon 2003; NARUC 2003; NPC 2003a).
R[enewable] E[energy]* and EE are a direct hedge against volatile and escalating gas prices because they reduce the need to
purchase variable-price natural gas-fired electricity generation, replacing that generation with fixed-price RE or EE resources
(see, e.g., Bolinger, Wiser, & Golove 2003; Awerbuch 2003). In addition to this direct contribution to price stability, by
displacing marginal gas-fired generation, RE and EE can reduce demand for natural gas and thus indirectly place downward
pressure on gas prices.3
Many recent modeling studies of increased RE and EE deployment have demonstrated that this “secondary” effect of putting
downward pressure on natural gas prices could be significant, with the consumer benefits from reduced gas prices in many
cases more than offsetting any increase in electricity costs caused by RE and/or EE deployment. As a result, this price effect is
increasingly cited as justification for policies promoting RE and EE. Yet, to date, little work has focused on reviewing the
reasonableness of this effect as it is portrayed in various studies, nor have studies attempted to benchmark that output against
economic theory. This paper is a first attempt to address these two issues.
90
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Amanda Griscom, energy analyst at the environmental consulting firm GreenOrder, 11-6-03, “Liquid Assets”,
http://www.grist.org/news/powers/2003/11/06/assets/, [Crystal Xia]
And that's just the beginning. Natural gas demand is projected to increase by nearly 50 percent in the next two decades, and
net imports are projected to increase by more than 200 percent, according to the Energy Information Administration, which
develops official statistics for the U.S. Department of Energy. And the percentage of LNG in our total natural gas demand is
expected to rise from less than 1 percent today to nearly 30 percent in 2025. "The growth in LNG is viable largely because it
is now cost-competitive with piped-in gasoline," said Manning of KeySpan. "If natural gas were as cheap as it was in the '90s
-- when it was roughly $2 per thousand cubic feet -- LNG wouldn't be an attractive alternative, but today it's more than double
that."
Energy Information Administration, 7-10-08, “What is liquefied natural gas (LNG) and how is it becoming
an energy source for the United States?”, http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/energy_in_brief
/liquefied_natural_gas_lng.cfm, [Crystal Xia]
International LNG trade has grown rapidly in recent years as new export facilities have started operations in several
countries. In 2006, 13 countries exported natural gas in the form of LNG to 17 importing countries.2 International trade
equaled the equivalent of more than 7.5 trillion cubic feet of natural gas in 2006. By the end of 2010, there will likely be five
additional exporting countries for a total of 18 LNG source countries, although not all will be consistent suppliers of LNG to
the United States.
The United States is not the only country that is turning to new international sources of natural gas. Countries in Europe
and Asia also rely heavily on LNG supplies. By far the largest volume of LNG consumption is in Asia, where Japan and South
Korea are the largest importers, accounting for more than 55% of global LNG demand. In Europe, Spain is the largest importer
with about 11% of global consumption. Prices in these countries in recent years have surpassed market prices in the United States,
resulting in the occasional diversion of cargos from the United States to these countries.
91
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
92
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
93
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
94
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
To give a sense of the prospects for LNG expansion, Figure 1 shows the probable quadrupling of
LNG demand in the Atlantic basin, with volumes rising from 40 Mt/y in 2003 to 160 Mt/y a
decade later. There will be major growth in demand in the Iberian Peninsula, significant growth
in France despite her traditional focus on nuclear power, and the potential for massive LNG
import growth in the United Kingdom as growing demand and declining production of natural gas
moves the UK from exporter importer stature. In North America, maturing production of natural
gas is failing to keep pace with demand. On the supply side, Figure 2 shows projected growth in LNG supply through 2015.
The reserves
are more than adequate, and there is a great deal of new and expanded supply project formation
activity. Out of the eight current export projects serving Atlantic markets, four are expanding, in
Nigeria, Oman, Qatar, and Trinidad. New projects are being built in Egypt and Norway, and new
projects are proposed in Angola, Equatorial Guinea, Iran, Nigeria, Venezuela, and in Algeria
(which is finally returning to the new project market after the debacles of the 1980s)
US demand for natural gas is projected to grow by 23% over the same period, and the forecasts for Europe and Asia are
just as striking. Gas provides about one-quarter of the total energy for the US economy. In Europe, the figure is 20% and
rising, mostly with gas piped from Russia, which has 30% of the world's known reserves and probably a lot more under the
frozen and largely unexplored north.
Qatar and Iran share another 25% in the vast North Field/South Pars field in the southern Gulf: Next comes Saudi Arabia and the
UAE with sizeable reserves. For the UAE, with 212 trillion cubic feet of gas, mostly in Abu Dhabi, the gas fields will fill the
economic gap left by the emirates' declining oil fields. Even Oman, whose modest oil production is also in decline, has used
LNG exports--worth some $1.2bn in 2002--to offset falling oil revenue.
95
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Actually, recent improvements in engineering and construction brought LNG production costs down by as much as 30
percent. "Most of these reductions have occurred in the liquefaction part of the process," said Stoppard, "which is the most
energy-intensive part." To import natural gas, it must be chilled to minus 260 degrees Fahrenheit, at which temperature it converts
to a liquid and reduces in volume. Once liquefied, "an amount of [natural gas] that would normally fill a beach ball can fit inside a
Ping-Pong ball," according to a Time magazine article entitled "The U.S. Is Running Out of Energy," from July 21, 2003. Once
shipped to terminals in the U.S., the liquid is slowly warmed up until it returns to its gaseous state, then sent through pipelines.
This might seem like a preposterously energy-intensive process, but in fact, it's surprisingly efficient. There's no refrigeration
required, because once the gas is liquefied, it just sits in giant insulated thermoses. As the liquid is shipped, it warms very slowly
and some gas escapes from the containers, but the waste gas is captured and actually used to run the ship's engine. The re-
gasification process simply consists of warming the liquid to room temperature, and requires very little energy. "Over the course
of the LNG process, from extraction to point of use, a surprisingly negligible amount of the original harvested quantity is lost --
less, in fact, than is lost piping gas thousands of miles from the upper reaches of Canada or from Mexico, as we do today," said
Cavanagh. LNG also has a long-term pricing advantage over pipeline gas, in that it is based on 20- to 30-year contracts.
Traditionally, natural gas prices have been highly volatile, mainly because they are susceptible to weather-driven swings. (Very
cold winters or very hot summers cause dramatic spikes in demand for gas heat and electricity, respectively.) LNG facilities,
which require investments of up to $5 billion in machinery and infrastructure, are built with long-term supply commitments;
those commitments also help stabilize prices, which is good for consumers and for the economy.
96
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
The challenge of energy security will grow more urgent in the years ahead, because the scale of the global trade in energy
will grow substantially as world markets become more integrated. Currently, every day some 40 million barrels of oil cross
oceans on tankers; by 2020, that number could jump to 67 million. By then, the United States could be importing 70 percent of its
oil (compared to 58 percent today and 33 percent in 1973) and so could China. The amount of natural gas crossing oceans as
LNG will triple to 460 million tons by 2020. The United States will be an important part of that market: although Lie meets
only about 3 percent of U.S. demand today, its share could reach more than 25 percent by 2020. Assuring the security of global
energy markets will require coordination on both an international and a national basis among companies and
governments, including energy, environmental, military, law enforcement, and intelligence agencies.
As a globally traded commodity, LNG assumes a significant role in the energy supply of major coastal nations such as the
US, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, and some European states. This section focuses on LNG receiving infrastructure in
the US. For a survey of the globalizing LNG market and the issues related to LNG supplies, see Jensen (2005).
The oil crises in the 1970s led to the construction of four LNG receiving terminals in the US. In the intervening
years, both Cove Point and Elba Island were mothballed and Lake Charles was also closed for a long period.
Now the four terminals are all re-opened and were or are being expanded.4 Whereas LNG has been primarily
used for peak demand, CCGT power plants have made it a less seasonal commodity. In the early years of the
present decade, LNG imports increased substantially, even though capacity utilization (around 55%) is still modest
(Simmons, 2005). However, the strong global price competition during the past two years has limited short-term
deliveries to the US and the volumes contracted under long-term agreements. There is a general consensus that LNG
imports will again rise as domestic production stagnates and declines, and imports from other sources (Canadian
pipeline gas) decline. Historically, Algeria was the dominant supplier to the US, but the mix of suppliers has shifted to
facilities at Trinidad/Tobago, which today account for over two-thirds of the LNG imported to the US. Additional
deliveries come from Nigeria, Qatar, Oman, and Malaysia. Negotiations are underway with other suppliers, some of which are
green-field operations and expect to deliver from Equatorial Guinea or Norway.
97
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
The LNG shipping industry has just completed 42 years of operations, during which time 47,000 cargoes have been
successfully delivered and over 100 million nautical miles have been logged by laden LNG carriers. In the history of LNG
shipping to date there has never been a major spill of LNG; no LNG containment system has been breached; and no
crew member has ever been killed as a result of a cargo incident.
LNG is safe – LNG has been shipping for 45 years without incident.
Steve Hargreaves, staff writer, 8-26-06, CNN, “Betting billions on liquefied natural gas”,
http://money.cnn.com/2006/08/28/news/economy/lng/index.htm, [Crystal Xia]
While there are currently only five LNG terminals in the U.S., more than 40 are on the drawing board. But many of these won't
get built, and it's not just economics blocking the way. Finding a place to build an LNG terminal is a challenge because many
people are afraid of a massive explosion if a plant were built near their homes. Industry officials point to an impressive safety
record. Bill Cooper, the executive director of the Center for Liquefied Natural Gas, says that, in the 45 years LNG has been
transported by boat, there has never been a spill involving an LNG ship. He also notes that the contents are not under
pressure, and it would take a rare combination of events to cause an explosion.
98
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
99
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
100
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
GAS tankers are today among the safest ships afloat but the sector still has a battle with a public image of vessels laden with
potentially explosive and devastating cargo. A recent study by the leading marine mutual the UK P&I Club has shown that gas
tankers have consistently fewer claims than any other shipping segment. That is reflected in the fact that out of 50,000
voyages made by liquefied petroleum and liquefied natural gas tankers since the 1960s, there has been no major loss
incident. "Misinformed opponents of gas ships have portrayed them as bombs waiting to go off", says UK P&I Club loss
prevention director Karl Lumbers. "In fact, they're among the safest ships afloat and have consistently fewer cargo claims
than other types of ships." More than 900 specialist tankers take 50m tonnes of LPG each year worldwide, together with 20m
tonnes of ammonia and petrochemical gases, while more than 200 vessels carry 150m tonnes of LNG.
101
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
102
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
103
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Industry, policymakers, and regulators agree that of the more than 40 proposals, a handful will become reality. Frisch et
al. (2005) favor 14 terminals “since collective capacity would vastly exceed the total amount of LNG consistent with forecasted
demand growth” but some industry watchers predict the amount will be less than ten. Since September 11, the public has
grown more aware of risks to national security. Chemical plants and existing and planned nuclear and LNG facilities have
come under intense scrutiny. Richard Clarke, a former Clinton administration official, has published several reports on the
likelihood of terrorist attacks against on- and offshore facilities and tankers. Given the reluctance of US coastal residents to
favor onshore facilities, receiving terminals on both coasts (and in Florida) will likely face prolonged battles for approval. An
easily documented example of grassroots resistance is Hess LNG's Weaver's Cove (Fall River, MA). The onshore brownfields site
is 4 miles from an existing pipeline. Following the project's announcement in 2000–2001, it quickly became apparent that the
proponents had not done their homework. To offload, tankers would travel many miles through Rhode Island waters to reach the
Fall River facility. Rhode Island officials were quick to fault the project, and local Massachusetts politicians joined the fray when
it was revealed that existing bridges were too small for tankers to pass under. Fall River, an aging industrial city has struggled to
redefine itself; residents and the former mayor made it clear to Massachusetts officials and to FERC early on that a nearby LNG
facility would deter new business from relocating. Terrorist and safety concerns also figured in the opposition. News in March
2008 concerning a new plan to construct an offshore facility as part of the original proposal further incensed local officials who
claimed that Hess LNG did not notify them before announcing the offshore addition. New LNG must also compete with existing
facilities and expansions. A barrier to entry is the lack of available upstream deliveries. In contrast to market entrants, incumbent
oil and natural gas majors currently simultaneously construct liquefaction capacities to correspond with regasification capacities
(e.g. ExxonMobil in Qatar on the upstream side and in the US and UK parallel on the downstream side of the LNG value chain).
At present, only minor non-contracted volumes are available for LNG trade. Spare capacities are likely to evolve only if existing
sites are expanded.
Finally, fluctuations in the price of oil coupled with continued political instability in the Mideast frequently make it
difficult for proponents of new LNG to get their message through to the public and many decision-makers.
2. The LNG market is already slowed due to lack of production and international demand.
Clifford Krauss, correspondent for the NYT, 5-29-08, “Global Demand Squeezing Natural Gas Supply”, New
York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/29/business/29gas.html, [Crystal Xia]
But now L.N.G. shipments to the United States are slowing to a trickle, and Cheniere and other companies have
dropped plans to build more terminals. A longstanding assumption of American energy policy has been that natural
gas would be plentiful abroad, and therefore readily available for importation, as production falls off in North
America, where many fields are tapped out. But some experts are starting to question that idea, saying
natural gas could be subject to the same explosion in overseas demand that has made oil so expensive. As it is, the
supertankers that were supposed to deliver cargoes of gas from Africa and the Middle East to the United
States are taking them to places like Spain and Japan instead, pushing up gas prices and depleting the
nation’s stockpiles as the hurricane season approaches. “A few years ago people looked at L.N.G. as a
solution to North America’s gas needs,” said Nikos Tsafos, an analyst with PFC Energy, a consulting
firm. “But today we see that there is less L.N.G. around than people expected, and there is more competition for that
L.N.G. from markets that are willing to pay more than the United States.”
104
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
R. Neal Elliot, Anna Monis Shipley, Steven Nadel, and Elizabeth Brown, @ American Council for an Energy-
Efficient Economy, 12-03, “Natural gas price effects of energy efficiency and renewable energy practices and
policies”, pg. 28, http://www.aceee.org/pubs/e032full.pdf, [Crystal Xia]
Wall Street Journal. 04/18/08. “Surge in Natural-Gas Price Stoked by New Global Trade.”
[Takumi Murayama]
In a twist, the effort to build alternative-energy projects like solar arrays and wind farms also boosts construction of
gas-fired plants. Because wind is unpredictable, it's often necessary to build back-up generators, and gas-fired plants have an
advantage in that they can be started up relatively quickly, says Doug Kimmelman, senior partner with Energy Capital Partners,
a private-equity firm focused on the power sector.
In addition, regulatory approval and construction times are shorter for gas plants than coal or nuclear. For reasons like these,
new gas-fired power plants continue to be built or planned
105
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Stephen Brown, Director of Energy Economics and Microeconomic Policy Activity @ the Federal Reserve
Bank of Dallas, 6-19-03 “US Natural Gas Markets in Turmoil: Testimony Prepared for a Hearing on The
Scientific Inventory of Oil and Gas Resources on Federal Lands”,
http://www.dallasfed.org/news/speeches/03brown_testimony.pdf, [Crystal Xia]
Sustained high natural gas prices are likely a drag on U.S. economic activity. Higher energy
prices are indicative of increased scarcity of natural gas which is a basic input to production.6 As
such, rising natural gas prices can result in a classic supply-side shock that reduces potential
output. Consequently, output and productivity growth are slowed. The decline in productivity
growth lessens real wage growth and increases the unemployment rate at which inflation
accelerates.7 If market participants expect the near-term effects on output to be greater than the
long-term effects, they will attempt to smooth their consumption by saving less or borrowing
more, which boosts the interest rate. With slowing output growth and an increase in the real
interest rate, the demand for real cash balances falls, and for a given rate of growth in the
monetary aggregate, the rate of inflation increases. Therefore, rising natural gas prices reduce
GDP growth and boost real interest rates and the measured rate of inflation.8
106
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
107
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
INDONESIA
108
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
SHELL – INDONESIA
A. LNG market is booming – makes US investment in Indonesian LNG more viable
Andrew Symon, Visiting Research Fellow at the Institute of South-east Asian Studies, 6/13/04, “Asia-Pacific: Get set for an LNG
explosion in the region,” Energy Bulletin, http://www.energybulletin.net/node/630
Until now, LNG has been only a relatively limited source of energy in Asia, geared primarily to Japanese needs, and, more
recently, markets in South Korea and Taiwan. From its historical role as a high-priced fuel for niche markets, almost a 'boutique' fuel,
LNG seems to be on the way to becoming a mass market fuel, attractive both commercially and environmentally.
Energy demand and supply patterns in Asia could be revolutionised if much larger volumes of LNG were supplied at a lower price and
under more flexible contract conditions, similar to those now found for coal and oil.
Great benefits would flow to the region. Natural gas is a very efficient and clean fuel. There is minimal environmental impact from its
production, shipment and combustion. Of all the fossil fuels, it produces the least emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse
gases and negligible sulphur dioxide and nitrous oxides.
On the supply side, producer countries would clearly gain from greater exports. Also, countries with strong financial, shipping
and trading centres could also find new roles in the LNG business. The equipment supply spin-offs are also important. Already
the current boom in the LNG business is resulting in order books overflowing at Japanese and Korean shipyards.
Yet, until now, natural gas supply in Asia has been limited by the distance of many demand centres from major gas fields.
Long-distance pipelines have not been practical and LNG has been an expensive option. Just 10 per cent of Asia's primary energy
consumption (including oil) is met by natural gas compared with 25 per cent in North America and approaching 40 per cent in western
Europe. In Russia, it is more than 50 per cent.
Historically, LNG production in the region focused on Japanese demand and, more recently, markets in Taiwan and South Korea.
Japan fostered LNG development after the oil shocks of the 1970s, when it turned to LNG, although highly priced, in order to
diversify its energy sources. Japanese finance underpinned gas field and LNG plant development in Indonesia, Brunei, Malaysia and
Australia.
Until recently, LNG production was dominated by the majors, such as Shell and Mobil (now ExxonMobil), with considerable
direction and participation by governments and state-owned companies, such as Malaysia's Petronas and Indonesia's Pertamina.
Buyers were also limited to the few large private power and gas utilities in Japan and the state-owned utilities and oil companies in
South Korea and Taiwan. Contracts were very long term (20 to 25 years) and tended to be rigid. Prices were linked and closely
indexed to changes in oil prices.
These conditions, it was argued, were necessary to secure finance for the multibillion-dollar costs of LNG production facilities,
upstream gas fields, shipping and regassification plants. Buyers, in turn, accepted these as the price of energy security.
But much has changed in the last five years. The LNG industry is becoming much more dynamic as a result of new buyers and
sellers. India and China have become LNG buyers. The US west coast seems certain to take LNG shortly and it must take
LNG from the Asia-Pacific region, as the Panama Canal is too narrow to allow passage of LNG carriers from plants in the
Caribbean, and west and north Africa. Shipments can move though from east to west through the Suez Canal. Mexico is also to
take LNG, mainly to fuel power, and pipeline gas supply to California.
South-east Asia may soon become an LNG consumer with the Philippines planning to take LNG from Indonesia. Singapore is also
considering taking LNG and Indonesia itself may ship LNG into Java from Indonesian Papua.
109
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
SHELL – INDONESIA
B. Renewable energy trades off with natural gas – it discourages natural gas producers.
Ryan Wiser and Mark Bolinger, research scientists @ Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Concerns about the price and supply of natural gas in the US have grown in recent years, and futures and options markets predict
high prices and significant price volatility for the immediate future. Whether we are witnessing the beginning of a major long-
term nationwide crisis or a costly but shorter-term supply demand adjustment remains to be seen. Results presented in this article
suggest that resource diversification, in particular increased investments in renewable energy, could help alleviate the threat
of high gas prices over the short and long term. By displacing gas-fired generation, increased deployment of renewable
energy is expected to reduce natural gas demand and consequently put downward pressure on gas prices. A review of the
economics literature shows that this secondary effect is to be expected and can be measured with the inverse price elasticity of
natural gas supply. Because of the respective shapes of long- and short-term supply curves, the long-term price response is
expected to be less significant than the shorter-term response. The effect of this natural gas price reduction may not entirely
represent an increase in aggregate economic wealth, and may in part reflect a benefit to natural gas consumers that comes at the
expense of natural gas producers. Conventional economics does not generally support government intervention for the sole
reason of shifting the demand curve for natural gas and thereby reducing gas prices. If policymakers are uniquely concerned about
the impact of gas prices on consumers, however, or are concerned about the potentially harmful macroeconomic impacts of higher
gas prices or on increasing imports of natural gas, then policies to reduce gas demand may be considered appropriate. It also
deserves note that this secondary gas-price-suppression form of risk mitigation is additional to the direct risk-reducing benefit of
replacing variable-priced natural gas with fixed-price renewable energy.
C. Indonesia needs investment or it will fail as a gas supplier and its economy will suffer
Grace Nirang, reporter in Jakarta, and Christian Schmollinger, reporter, 8/10/06, “Natural gas running low in Indonesia,”
International Herald Tribune, http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/08/09/bloomberg/bxgas.php
Indonesia is in danger of losing its dominance of the world's market for liquefied natural gas as its fields are running out of gas
faster than expected and local politics are deterring new producers from investing in the country.
Chevron, the American oil company, supplies gas to the world's largest liquefaction plant, located on the Indonesian part of Borneo
Island. The company told the Indonesian government last month that there was not enough gas to meet commitments to customers in
Japan, South Korea and Taiwan.
Indonesian sales are expected to fall 19 percent this year, according to government shipment plans.
Indonesia has been the world's top supplier of liquefied natural gas for three decades. But it has failed to find new supplies of
gas just as prices and demand for the cleaner-burning fuel have surged to records. Some buyers are looking elsewhere, like
Qatar, cutting revenue and hurting the government's efforts to lower its budget deficit.
"If we can't attract investment in the gas industry for new reserves, thenthere will be a decline as a major global supplier,"
Anton Gunawan, an economist for Citibank in Jakarta, said.
110
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
SHELL – INDONESIA
D. Revenues from natural gas exports are substantial – 10 percent of total export revenues
US Embassy, Jakarta Indonesia, 9/1/03, “Natural Gas Changes in Indonesia,” Energy News,
http://jakarta.usembassy.gov/econ/natural_gas2003.html
Indonesia has between 170 and 180 trillion standard cubic feet (TSCF) of natural gas reserves, the twelfth largest in the world.
In 2002, the country produced 3.04 trillion cubic feet (TCF) of gas, number six in world gas production. Indonesia currently
supplies 26 percent of the world’s LNG. LNG accounts for 54 percent of the country’s total natural gas production and is exported
to Japan, South Korea and Taiwan. Pipeline gas exports to Singapore began in 2001, reaching 82 BCF last year, with a new Sumatra-
Singapore pipeline inaugurated last month. Revenues from gas exports are substantial -- $5.6 billion in 2002, or about 10 percent
of Indonesia’s total export revenues. Domestically, gas use comes primarily from fertilizer and petrochemical plants (34 percent)
and the power industry (25 percent). Most of Indonesia’s gas comes from East Kalimantan (33 TCF in reserves) and Sumatra (29 TCF
in reserves), but there are large uncommitted reserves in Papua (18 TCF) and other areas in the archipelago (46 TCF). The industry is
dominated by seven major companies, which account for 90 percent of all production (see para 19).
E. Indonesian progress is fragile and contingent on its economy, loss in economy would collapse the
hopes from democratic consolidation
Angel Rabasa, Senior Policy Analyst, RAND Corporation, and Peter Chalk, an expert on transnational crime and terrorism at the
RAND Corporation, Washington, USA, Rand, 2001, 115 pgs, Indonesia's Transformation and the Stability of Southeast Asia, p. 70
The best-case scenario presumes that the political leadership in Jakarta will move the political reform process toward
a stable democratic order; it is also contingent on whether the government will be able to get a grip on the economy, restore
investor confidence, and bring about some improvement in the standard of living of ordinary Indonesians. If the Wahid
government or its successor were able to manage these challenges successfully, the prospects for democratic consolidation
would improve.
The current trend lines, however, do not appear to be encouraging. As of the end of 2000, the governing coalition had all but
unraveled. President Wahid has seen the erosion of his support in Parliament and survived in his position only through the tolerance of
Vice President Megawati’s PDI–P. The economic recovery, such as it is, is fragile. According to sources in Singapore, some of the
ethnic Chinese capital that had fled Indonesia returned after Wahid’s election, but the flow of capital slowed because of lack of
confidence in the Indonesian government’s economic management.2
111
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
SHELL – INDONESIA
F. Smooth Indonesian transition key to Southeast Asian security and Asia-Pacific power balance
Angel Rabasa, Senior Policy Analyst, RAND Corporation, and Peter Chalk, an expert on transnational crime and terrorism at the
RAND Corporation, Washington, USA, Rand, 2001, 115 pgs, Indonesia's Transformation and the Stability of Southeast Asia, p.
Questia
Indonesia is undergoing a systemic political transition that could lead to a variety of outcomes, from the consolidation of
democracy to regression to authoritarianism or disintegration. The stakes are high. With a population of 212 million and a land
mass greater than the rest of Southeast Asia combined, vast natural resources, and a strategic location straddling critical sea-
lanes of communication and straits, Indonesia is the key to Southeast Asian security. Therefore, Indonesia's choices and its
evolution will frame the future of Southeast Asia and influence the balance of power in the broader Asia-Pacific region.
Influencing Indonesia's transformation is the most critical challenge to U. S. foreign and defense policy in Southeast Asia. This
study examines the trends and dynamics that are driving Indonesia's trans formation, outlines Indonesia's possible strategic futures and
analyzes their implications for regional stability and U. S. security interests, and identifies options available to the United States and
the U. S. Air Force to respond to these challenges.
G. Asian instability would collapse the global economy and cause nuclear war
Jonathan S. Landay, national security and intelligence correspondent, 3/10/2k “Top Administration Officials
Warn Stakes For US Are High in Asian Conflicts” Knight Ridder/ Tribune News Service, p. lexis
112
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Indonesia, the world's third-largest exporter of liquefied natural gas, will get record price for the fuel supplied to Japan in a
contract extension starting 2011 as buyers seek to secure supply amid rising demand.
The price of LNG from the Bontang plant on Borneo island will be “almost'' US$16 a million British thermal units, Iin Arifin
Takhyan, vice-president at PT Pertamina, the appointed seller for the fuel, said in Jakarta yesterday.
Benchmark LNG prices have more than doubled since 2002, partly as a slump in Indonesia's exports forced Asian power
generators to seek replacements on the spot market. The Southeast Asian nation has contracts with a group of Japanese utilities
including Kansai Electric Power Co. and Osaka Gas Co to supply a total of 12 million tonnes of LNG a year, which will expire by
March 2011.
The Southeast Asian nation will cut LNG supply to Japan by 75% to 3 million tonnes a year for the first five years after current
contracts expire, Takhyan said. The supply will be reduced to 2 million tonnes annually in the five years after that.
113
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Indonesia's state-owned gas distribution firm, PT Perusahaan Gas Negara (Persero) Tbk (PGN) (JSX:PGAS) (Jakarta, Indonesia),
plans to undertake a $1.78 billion project to construct three liquefied-natural-gas (LNG) regasification terminals in East Java,
West Java, and Medan, North Sumatra, to address the growing demand for LNG in the islands. PGN will secure funds for the
project from the company and through international loans. Construction of the terminals is scheduled to commence by the end of 2008
and will continue until 2011. Operating and maintenance contracts will last from the fourth quarter of 2011 to 2016.
114
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
However, according to the US Energy Information Administration (EIA), Indonesia is the tenth largest holder of proven
natural gas reserves in the world and the single largest in the Asia-Pacific region.
Historically, the EIA says, Indonesian natural gas production has been geared toward export markets, but the country has made
an effort to shift natural gas toward domestic uses in recent years as a substitute for the country’s declining oil output. However,
Indonesia’s limited natural gas transmission and distribution network remains an obstacle to further domestic consumption.
115
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
The global LNG market today faces declining production and transportation costs, excess supply, increased use of flexible
contracts, and greater choice of suppliers. The Japanese Institute of Energy Economics forecasts that LNG supplies in Asia will rise
to 180 million metric tons per year (mmtpa) by 2010, outpacing demand by about 60 MT. The benchmark prices that China
negotiated in late 2002 with Australia and Indonesia (between $2.40-$3.00/mmbtu) for the Guangdong and Fujian LNG terminals
confirmed the downward pressure on prices. Japan (the world’s largest LNG importer), whose import LNG prices for 2002 averaged
$4.27/mmbtu, took particular notice. As a result, Indonesia’s traditional LNG markets (Japan, South Korea and Taiwan) are
eyeing new sources of LNG and seek to negotiate lower prices or at least shorter contracts. (Note: Indonesia is not standing
still, however. It is currently seeking marketing opportunities in the western U.S. and Baja California with U.S. companies
such as Marathon, Sempra and ChevronTexaco.)
The Mitsubishi Corporation is mulling supplying liquefied natural gas (LNG) from Indonesia to the California market in the
United States.
Mitsubishi's energy business group manager in Jakarta Mauren Toruan said the firm's subsidiary Sound Energy Solutions had
applied to the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and California's Port of Long Beach for a license to
construct an LNG terminal at the port.
""After the filing, we will start serious negotiations to secure five million tons per annum of LNG for the terminal and send a
delegation to Indonesia,"" said Mauren.
If the FERC and Long Beach authorities approve the LNG terminal project, Mitsubishi would start construction by the end of this
year, aiming for completion in late 2007, he said.
The planned US$400 million terminal is designed to provide around 700 million cubic feet of gas daily, which will meet 10
percent of demand in California.
Mauren said the company favored Indonesia as the LNG supplier for its California terminal because of its flexibility in pricing.
Indonesia is willing to sell its LNG according to the U.S. pricing scheme, rather than the Japanese pricing scheme -- upon which
Indonesia has been selling LNG for decades to the Asia-Pacific market.
""In the U.S., the price of natural gas moves separately from crude oil price ... LNG price in Japan is linked to crude oil price,"" said
Mauren.
Japan is a traditional LNG buyer from Indonesia, along with South Korea and Taiwan.
Indonesia and other LNG producers in the region, including Australia and Malaysia, are eying the huge potential of the U.S.
gas market.
116
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
René Snijder, Energy consultant, lecturer at the Energy Delta Institute in The Netherlands, member of the gas group of the
Clingendael Institute and member of IGU committee B (Strategy and Regulation), with over 30 years experience in the natural gas
industry, working for the NV Nederlandse
Gasunie and two years for Shell, 3/11/2008 “The Future of Gas and the Role of LNG: Economic and Geopolitical Implications,” Real
Instituto Elcano,
http://209.85.215.104/search?q=cache:L5jbxi17HZQJ:www.realinstitutoelcano.org/wps/wcm/connect/resources/file/eb876d0ad931a07
/WP14-
2008_Snijder_Gas_LNG_Economic_Geopolitical_Implications.pdf%3FMOD%3DAJPERES%26attachment%3Dtrue+Indonesia+LN
G+economy&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=45&gl=us&client=firefox-a
Fifty-six percent of natural gas reserves are located in just three countries (Russia, Iran and Qatar). They have an economically
viable choice to ship their gas to either Asia, the US or Europe – wherever the best market might be found–. This could be not
only an economic choice but perhaps also one based on which market might best serve short- or long-term geopolitical
interests.
Furthermore, consumer countries might not have any guarantee that producing countries and their NOCs (national oil/gas companies)
are able (or willing) to make all the necessary investments in time to supply the markets. Investment could transform a sellers’
market into a buyers’ market, thereby putting pressure on prices for not only their new supplies, but also –and even more
importantly– their existing supplies. Due to the nature of the gas market, with its limited supply options, the risk exists that
producers will be in a position to exercise market power, preventing a buyers’ market from developing. This would be to the
detriment of consuming countries; on the other hand, producing countries will always need to maintain good long-term
relationships with future markets.
Natural gas trade is largely tied to bilateral negotiations and trade relations
René Snijder, Energy consultant, lecturer at the Energy Delta Institute in The Netherlands, member of the gas group of the
Clingendael Institute and member of IGU committee B (Strategy and Regulation), with over 30 years experience in the natural gas
industry, working for the NV Nederlandse
Gasunie and two years for Shell, 3/11/2008 “The Future of Gas and the Role of LNG: Economic and Geopolitical Implications,” Real
Instituto Elcano,
http://209.85.215.104/search?q=cache:L5jbxi17HZQJ:www.realinstitutoelcano.org/wps/wcm/connect/resources/file/eb876d0ad931a07
/WP14-
2008_Snijder_Gas_LNG_Economic_Geopolitical_Implications.pdf%3FMOD%3DAJPERES%26attachment%3Dtrue+Indonesia+LN
G+economy&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=45&gl=us&client=firefox-a
Of the internationally traded gas in 2005, 77% was pipeline gas. A different picture has emerged for this distinct trading
realm: only 60 % of the pricing is based on the competing fuel principle while a very large share stems directly from the result
of bilateral negotiations (for instance, that between the Ukraine and Russia). Trade based on spot prices for pipelined gas across
borders is only 28%.
LNG supplies can be more easily redirected between and among markets than pipeline gas. Of course there are often contractual
rigidities, gas specifications and other hurdles to be taken into account, but they make for less of a barrier that could lead to supply
interruption than does the physical and market context of pipeline gas.
Pipeline deliveries create a mutual dependency and a long-term relationship with more potential geopolitical impact than LNG
trade could ever bring to bear on the mutual relations between suppliers and consumers. As a measure of the potential
geopolitical impact pipelines can have, one need go no further than the many disputes and debates on pipelines to Europe. Pipeline
route, conditions and desirability are now controversial political topics, far more debated than the possible different
geographic o national origins of LNG imports. This is perhaps a far more interesting topic requiring the attention of policy makers.
117
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Brink – Investment
Indonesian gas markets are suffering now and need new investors – courting the US now
James Irwin, reporter in Singapore, 3/30/04, “Facing Competition, Indonesia Courts LNG Buyers,” International Oil Daily, p.
Lexis
Although Indonesia remains the world's biggest LNG producer, its once-dominant position is showing signs of strain. LNG
production is flat at the Total-operated Bontang LNG plant and is in sharp decline at Exxon Mobil's Arun facility. With years to go
until the BP-led Tangguh project in Papua starts operating, the country's LNG production has already slumped from a peak of 29
million tons in 1999 to 25.3 million tons last year.
Overall, Indonesia's LNG fields continue to decline while new LNG fields like Tangguh are not expected to begin producing until
2007 or even 2008. Others, like the Donggi field, will start producing later than that.
The increasing global supply of LNG is also making it hard for Indonesia to line up buyers. Competition has already heated
up, courtesy of the Royal Dutch/Shell-led Sakhalin-2 project in eastern Russia, as well as from Australia's North West Shelf and
Gorgon projects (IOD Mar.15,p4).With China-- and to a lesser extent India-- increasing their demand for LNG, countries like
Russia and Australia look set to capture more of Indonesia's share.
The US West Coast is also shaping up as an important LNG battleground for Indonesia, Russiaand Australia, whose energy
minister, Ian Macfarlane, plans to personally pitch California's Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger on the benefits of Australian LNG at
a meeting in June. Japan's Mitsubishi is considering sourcing 5 million tons of Tangguh LNG each year for its planned import terminal
at Long Beach, California. Mitsubishi owns a stake in Tangguh, as well as Sakhalin.
Indonesia's outlook is made worse by the fact that its long-term LNG contracts with two of the world's biggest LNG consumers –
Japan and South Korea-- expire at the end of this decade. The two North Asian countries are deregulating downstream gas sales and
looking for cheaper prices.
Before flying to Vienna to chair this week's Opec meeting, Purnomo said he was trying to get China to double the 2.6 million tons/yr
of Tangguh LNG that the country agreed to buy two years ago -- starting in 2007 -- as well as attempting to line up a deal to sell LNG
to a proposed new terminal near Qingdao in Shandong Province, according to reports in Chinese media.
As well as finding new markets for its LNG, Indonesia also desperately needs to attract more foreign investment to its energy
sector to ensure the future success of its LNG industry. But government officials said this week that total foreign direct investment
for the first two months of the year was down 66% compared with the same period of 2003, partly because foreign investors are
spooked by rising political uncertainties ahead of the country's first direct presidential election in early July. Investors in Indonesia
already face numerous obstacles including legal confusion, unclear regional autonomy legislation, corruption and security problems.
Overall, the Indonesian government approved just $805 million worth of foreign investment in January and February this
year compared with $2.4 billion during the same period of 2003.
118
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Impacts – Economy
Non-oil exports are key to Indonesian economic stability and international creditworthiness
Prema-Chandra Athukorala, Professor of Economics, Division of Economics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, The
Australian National University, “Post-crisis export performance: The Indonesian experience in regional perspective,” Bulletin of
Indonesian Economic Studies; Aug 2006, Vol. 42 Issue 2, p177-211, Business Source Premier
The economic boom in Indonesia from the late 1980s until the onset of the financial crisis in mid-1997 was underpinned by rapid
export growth, accompanied by a dramatic shift in the commodity composition of exports away from crude oil, then the principal
export, towards non-oil primary products and manufacturing. Rapid growth of non-oil exports was the foundation of Indonesia’s
success in maintaining international creditworthiness and macroeconomic stability following the end of the oil boom in the
mid-1980s. The expansion of manufacturing exports, in particular, was instrumental in bringing about rapid employment
growth. Against this backdrop, there is serious concern in contemporary Indonesian policy circles about the failure of export
performance to regain its pre-crisis dynamism.1 The purpose of this paper is to inform this debate by examining postcrisis export
performance in Indonesia from a comparative East Asian perspective, against the backdrop of pre-crisis experience and ongoing
changes in patterns of international production. Particular attention will be paid to the perceived or real challenges arising from
China’s meteoric rise as a major competitor in global markets, and from the phasing out of the Multi-fi bre Arrangement (MFA),
which regulated world trade in textiles and garments for over 40 years. Non-oil exports like natural gas are key to
Indonesian economy Prema-Chandra Athukorala, Professor of Economics, Division of Economics, Research School of Pacific
and Asian Studies, The Australian National University, “Post-crisis export performance: The Indonesian experience in regional
perspective,” Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies; Aug 2006, Vol. 42 Issue 2, p177-211, Business Source Premier At the end of
the oil boom in the early 1980s, petroleum and petroleum and gas products (henceforth referred to as ‘oil’ for brevity) accounted for
almost threequarters of total merchandise exports from Indonesia (table 1, fi gure 1). The collapse of oil prices in 1982, followed by
another precipitous fall in 1985–86, therefore brought about a massive decline in total export earnings. Export earnings (in
current dollars) contracted at an average annual rate of 7.4% between 1982 and 1986 (table 1), compared with a staggering 37.6%
growth between 1973 and 1981. In the trough of 1986, total exports amounted to $15 billion (18% of GDP), compared with a peak
level of $22 billion (31% of GDP) in 1982. But the Indonesian economy managed to regain export dynamism from about 1987
by shifting to non-oil exports of both primary products and manufactures. In the decade 1987–96, total export earnings grew at
an average rate of 13% per year, with all years except 1993, 1994 and 1996 (when the growth rates were slightly below 10%)
recording double-digit growth. Rapid export expansion, with manufacturing exports playing the pivotal role, was a key factor in
Indonesia’s rapid economic growth. The dramatic shift in export composition towards manufacturing lessened the
vulnerability of the economy to sudden external shocks, and thus provided a congenial setting for sound macroeconomic
management. Rapid growth of labour-intensive exports also made a significant contribution to employment expansion and
poverty alleviation (Hill 2000).
119
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Impacts – Stability
Indonesian economic collapse risks instability and violence that would hurt the global economy – key
shipping lanes would be obstructed
Rajan Menon, Monroe J. Rathbone Professor of International Relations at Lehigh University, director of NBR's Eurasia Policy
Studies program, and academic fellow and advisor for the International Peace and Security Program at the Carnegie Corporation of
New York, 2001, “Another Year of Living Dangerously?,” The National Interest [Washington DC] No. 65 The Fall 2001 issue,
http://www.geocities.com/baguala67/ni250901b.htm?200818
Indonesia may survive the combined assault of an ailing economy, deepening separatism, and a failing state. Such an
outcome is certainly desirable, but it is not likely. American leaders must therefore brace for the possibility that Indonesia could
still collapse in chaos and disintegrate in violence. Alternatively, the current instability could continue until economic recovery
and political compromise give rise to a country of a rather different shape and size. With Wahid gone and Megawati in place, this
is now somewhat more likely. Even the loss of Aceh and West Papua need not spell national disintegration; without such provinces
Indonesia would still retain the critical mass to endure as a state. The second of these denouements is preferable to the first, but both
will create strong shock waves.
Indonesia's size and location are the reasons why. The three major straits that slice through it are pivotal passages for
the global economy. Malacca is by far the most important, particularly for energy shipments. Some 450 vessels and about 10 million
barrels of oil pass through daily, and East Asian demand, driven by China, is expected to rise from 12 million barrels a day in 2000 to
over 20 million barrels in twenty years. Japan, China, Taiwan and South Korea would suffer severely and soon if fallout from turmoil
in Aceh (at its northern end) or Riau (at its southern end) blocked this passage. Its narrowness, 1.5 miles in the Phillips Channel in the
Singapore Strait, and ten miles between Singapore and the Riau archipelago, adds to the danger. The Lombok Strait, which ships use
to sail to northeast Asia through the Strait of Makasar between Borneo and Sulawesi, is next in importance, although it handles a far
smaller volume of traffic than Malacca and is of negligible importance for energy shipments. The Lombok-Makasar route is, however,
a critical corridor for Australia's coal and iron ore exports to northeast Asia and for manufactured exports moving south from there. It
is also the most likely detour were Malacca rendered impassable or hazardous. By comparison, Sunda is a minor shipping channel; the
consequences of its closure would be minimal for transcontinental trade.
Rerouting Malacca traffic through Lombok would strain the capacity of the world's merchant fleet, increase
transportation costs, and create severe bottlenecks. The problems would be even worse if all three straits were unusable and
ships had to transit northeast Asia by skirting Australia's northern coast. Market signals would eventually add other carrying
capacity but the question is how quickly and smoothly the adjustment occurs, and what the economic and political
consequences would be in the meantime. The ramifications of blocked or delayed maritime traffic, or even just panic over the
possibility, would spread speedily throughout globalization's many circuits. Insurance rates would rise; coverage may even be
denied if underwriters deem the risks excessive. The effects of obstructed energy, machinery and manufactured goods would
register in capital markets, short-term investors would be scared off, and the flow of much-needed foreign direct investment
into a region still convalescing from the blows of 1997 would slow.
120
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Impacts – Stability
Political instability in Indonesia would cause the country to disintegrate and ethnic violence
Angel Rabasa, Senior Policy Analyst, RAND Corporation, and Peter Chalk, an expert on transnational crime and terrorism at the
RAND Corporation, Washington, USA, Rand, 2001, 115 pgs, Indonesia's Transformation and the Stability of Southeast Asia, p.73
Unlike Pakistan or Turkey, where the military has regularly stepped in to redress perceived failures of civilian government,
there is no tradition of military coups in Indonesia.4 Over the short term, therefore, only a catastrophic political failure—for
instance, the breach of the constitution or impending dismemberment of Indonesia—could compel the military to assume
control of the government. Should that occur, one could envisage a military government of two basic variants:
The first would be a military-technocratic government that preserved the balance between the secular and Islamic (“Green”)
factions in the TNI; economic policymaking would be in the hands of nonpolitical technocrats. This would be the most moderate
variant of a military led government and probably one that would become more attractive as the situation deteriorated.
The second would be an alliance of the military with one of the political sectors, possibly one or more of the Islamic
parties. This variant would be closer to the Pakistani model. It would also be the most dangerous because it would exacerbate
ethnic and religious tensions and accelerate the disintegration process. Some observers are troubled by the Pakistani mix of
military rule and support for radical Islamic groups and are concerned about the possibility of the same mix occurring in Indonesia.5
In either case, a military-led government would be inherently unstable because the military would likely face the
opposition of important sectors of domestic public opinion and the international community. Moreover, such a government
would probably lack the political tools and experience to run a country as large and diverse as Indonesia. Over time, a military
government would widen fissures within the military itself as the different military factions competed over the distribution of
power and policymaking authority.
121
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Impacts – Stability
Indonesian transition to democracy key to a stable South-east Asia – leads to multiple scenarios for
violence and instability
Angel Rabasa, Senior Policy Analyst, RAND Corporation, and Peter Chalk, an expert on transnational crime and terrorism at the
RAND Corporation, Washington, USA, Rand, 2001, 115 pgs, Indonesia's Transformation and the Stability of Southeast Asia, p.
Questia
The Republic of Indonesia, the world's fourth most populous state, is in a process of profound political transformation.
Depending on how the process unfolds, Indonesia could evolve into a more stable and democratic state, revert to
authoritarianism, or break up into its component parts—an Asian Yugoslavia but on an almost continental scale. Indonesia's
evolution could drive the Southeast Asian security environment in either of two directions. A successful democratic transition in
Indonesia would be a factor of stability in Southeast Asia and beyond.
Indonesia would become the world's largest Muslim majority democracy—a development that could have a significant impact
on the political evolution of Asia and the Muslim world. It could lead to the reconstruction of a Southeast Asian security system
grounded on democratic political principles. A stable Southeast Asia would translate into reduced opportunities for potential
Chinese hegemonism and, by the same token, could facilitate China's emergence as a more influential actor without
destabilizing the regional balance of power.
Conversely, political deterioration or breakdown, the rise of Islamic radicalism, or, in the worst-case scenario, violent
disintegration, would drive the regional security environment in the opposite direction. Southeast Asia would become more
chaotic and unstable, less inviting for investment and more prone to capital flight, and more vulnerable to a bid for regional
domination by a rising China.
122
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Impacts – Stability
Indonesian disintegration would set off a chain reaction causing multiple scenarios of instability in the
region
Rajan Menon, Monroe J. Rathbone Professor of International Relations at Lehigh University, director of NBR's Eurasia Policy
Studies program, and academic fellow and advisor for the International Peace and Security Program at the Carnegie Corporation of
New York, 2001, “Another Year of Living Dangerously?,” The National Interest [Washington DC] No. 65 The Fall 2001 issue,
http://www.geocities.com/baguala67/ni250901b.htm?200818
Indonesia's neighbors have other worries, as well, as they watch this wobbly behemoth. For Malaysia, one is that the
Malaysian Islamic Party, already powerful in northern Malaysia, could receive a fillip were militant Islam to become more
significant in Indonesia's politics as a result of the turmoil-or were it to dominate its successor states. Thailand and the
Philippines, which ave breakaway Islamist groups in their southern regions, fear that Indonesia's collapse could produce an
undesirable demonstration effect. Papua New Guinea, which borders West Papua, could be swamped by refugees and also face
an older problem: incursions from the Indonesian military in hot pursuit of Papuan guerrillas. Singapore and Malaysia have
invested in pipelines carrying energy from Riau and from Indonesia's Natuna gas fields (located in the South China Sea between
peninsular Malaysia and Sarawak) and are watching nervously. ASEAN, whose economic and political clout has fallen short of
members' hopes, will be reduced to a salon if Indonesia, its keystone, crumbles.
Neither is it clear how Japan, China and Australia would react to various scenarios in Indonesia. Few convergent
interests unite them, and history has done much to divide them. This augurs ill for cooperation on economic assistance, refugee relief,
piracy, or peacekeeping to stem Indonesia's unraveling or to deal with the consequences if that proves impossible. Indeed, anarchy in
Indonesia could start a scramble among these states that is driven more by fear, uncertainty and worst-case thinking than by
the opportunistic pursuit of advantage. A process leading to sponsorship of competitive proxy proto-statelets that rise from
Indonesia's wreckage is an extreme scenario, but cannot be ruled out.
Beyond the general tendency of states divided by suspicion to jockey for position when uncertainty or opportunity prevails,
there are other specific motives for intervention. China could be drawn into the fray if Indonesia's seven-million-strong Chinese
population, which has often been a scapegoat in times of trouble, were to be victimized. Beijing's increasing concern for secure
energy supplies since becoming a net importer in 1993 has already made it more assertive in the South China Sea, and could provide
another motive. Given Indonesia's uncertain future, Chinese maps depicting Beijing's jurisdiction over Indonesia's Natuna gas
fields are a worrisome portent, particularly for Malaysia and Singapore, who envision energy pipelines from this site.
123
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Rajan Menon, Monroe J. Rathbone Professor of International Relations at Lehigh University, director of NBR's Eurasia Policy
Studies program, and academic fellow and advisor for the International Peace and Security Program at the Carnegie Corporation of
New York, 2001, “Another Year of Living Dangerously?,” The National Interest [Washington DC] No. 65 The Fall 2001 issue,
http://www.geocities.com/baguala67/ni250901b.htm?200818
The consequences of Indonesia's breakup would affect American interests, as well. American energy and raw materials
companies (Exxon-Mobil, Texaco, Chevron, Newmont Mining, Conoco and Freeport-McMoRan, among others) operate in
Indonesia, particularly in Aceh, Riau, and West Papua, and many of the ships that traverse the Strait of Malacca are American-
owned. The United States is also a major trader and investor in East Asia and is to some degree hostage to its fate, especially
now that the American economy is slowing. Moreover, if Indonesia fractures, worst-case thinking and preemptive action
among its neighbors could upset regional equilibrium and undermine the American strategic canopy in East Asia. The United
States has a network of bases and alliances and 100,000 military personnel in the region, and is considered the guarantor of
stability by most states-a status it will forfeit if it stands aside as Indonesia falls apart. America's competitors will scrutinize its
actions to gauge its resolve and acumen. So will its friends and allies-Australia, Japan, Singapore, Thailand and South Korea-each of
whom would be hurt by Indonesia's collapse.
124
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Southeast Asia derives its geopolitical importance from the region's location at the crossroads between the concentration of
industrial, technological, and military power in Northeast Asia, the Indian sub continent and the oil resources of the Middle
East, and Australia and the Southwest Pacific. A high proportion of the trade of Japan, the Republic of Korea, Taiwan, and
Australia, including much of their oil imports, transits the straits and sea-lanes of communication in Southeast Asia.1 From a
military perspective, these sea-lanes are critical to the movement of U. S. forces from the Western Pacific to the Indian Ocean
and the Persian Gulf.
Southeast Asia is also important as the cultural as well as the geographic crossroads of Asia, where Sinic, Hindu, Islamic, and
Western civilizations have met and interacted for almost a millennium.2 If national boundaries were replaced with ethno-religious
boundaries, one would find a far-from-homogeneous Muslim arc from southern Thailand, through the Malaya peninsula,
Sumatra, Java, the coastal areas of Borneo, to the Sulu archipelago and parts of Mindanao in the southern Philippines; strong
Christian, animist, or mixed communities in the Moluccas, Sulawesi, Kalimantan (Borneo), Nusa Tenggara, and Irian Jaya (Papua); a
Hindu majority in Bali; a predominantly Catholic population in the Philippines; diverse cultures, largely Buddhist, in mainland
Southeast Asia; and Chinese communities spread throughout the region. Muslims constitute al most 90 percent of Indonesia's
population, but as shown in Table 1.1, Christians and other non-Muslims constitute majorities or principal minorities in several
provinces in eastern and central Indonesia.
125
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
INDONESIA AFF
126
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
2AC – INDONESIA
1. Indonesia is shifting to regional markets as they lose out in the global market
US Embassy, Jakarta Indonesia, 9/1/03, “Natural Gas Changes in Indonesia,” Energy News,
http://jakarta.usembassy.gov/econ/natural_gas2003.html
3. The nature of Indonesia’s gas industry is changing, however. New LNG producers in Qatar, Australia, Russia, along with
Malaysia, now challenge Indonesia’s leadership in the LNG market. At the same time, a regional gas transmission network is
developing, creating new gas markets and sources of revenue. Domestically, the reduction of fuel subsidies ease fuel price
distortions, making natural gas more competitive as a fuel alternative. Gas should also play a significant role in meeting the
country’s growing power demands. Finally, the Oil and Gas Law of 2001 has streamlined the process for domestic gas supply
sales and created a new domestic market obligation (DMO) for gas. These changes create new opportunities in the domestic
gas market, even as the global LNG market becomes more diversified.
2. Non-Unique Indonesia is losing its hold on the natural gas market – customers are switching away
now
Grace Nirang, reporter in Jakarta, and Christian Schmollinger, reporter, 8/10/06, “Natural gas running low in Indonesia,”
International Herald Tribune, http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/08/09/bloomberg/bxgas.php
Utilities in Japan, the largest Asian economy, are turning to other markets. Tokyo Electric Power and Tokyo Gas, the largest
Japanese power and gas suppliers, have signed up with Royal Dutch Shell's Sakhalin project in Russia to diversify supplies. Osaka
Gas is in talks with Inpex, an oil and gas producer based in Tokyo, about joining a $6 billion liquefied natural gas project in Australia.
Japan buys 40 percent of the world's liquefied natural gas and depends on Indonesia for a quarter of its imports of the fuel,
according to the Japanese Ministry of Finance. The gas is part of a strategy to reduce the country's reliance on Middle East oil.
"The Japanese must be pretty worried about what's happening in Indonesia," Andy Flower, a former BP executive who works as
an independent consultant, said by telephone. "There's no way they can renew the contracts and fill the pipe."
Calls from politicians, including Vice President Jusuf Kalla, to divert Borneo gas to other parts of Indonesia have fanned concern
about its reliability as a supplier.
Buyers are "already outraged by our failure to meet commitments," said Ari Soemarno, the head of the state oil company,
Pertamina, which negotiates Indonesia's liquefied natural gas sales contracts. "We're still studying the impact of Chevron's
statement."
While buyers are seeking alternatives, suppliers like Chevron in Indonesia have become reluctant to invest in fields that could
have to supply markets in Java at lower prices than Japan, said Christopher Newton, the chairman of Indonesian Petroleum
Association.
All export contracts from the Borneo plant at Bontang, known as Badak NGL, are up for renewal between 2009 and 2011.
127
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
2AC – INDONESIA
3. Expanding into the US market might not be beneficial – pre-existing competition means selling would
be on a spot-term basis
Andrew Symon, Visiting Research Fellow at the Institute of South-east Asian Studies, 6/13/04, “Asia-Pacific: Get set for an LNG
explosion in the region,” Energy Bulletin, http://www.energybulletin.net/node/630
Future supply to the US could force radical change to the industry in the Asia-Pacific region. Producers would sell into what is
already a very large and competitive domestic gas market supplied by Canadian and US fields. They would likely have to sell
cargoes on short and spot-term basis, accepting US market prices and hedging against risk with various futures and other
financial instruments.
LOONG TSE MIN, staff writer in Kuala Lumpur, 7/14/08, “Long-term challenge to users of natural gas,” The Star Online,
http://biz.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2008/7/14/business/21813487&sec=business
According to Petronas estimates, the demand for gas in Peninsular Malaysia has increased by 97% since 1997, which has put a
strain on supply facilities.
Petronas had said that its offshore production facilities and the Peninsular Gas Utilisation (PGU) system were running at full
capacity to meet increasing demand.
“As our production is unable to meet demand, we have increased the purchase of gas from other sources beyond offshore
Terengganu,” a spokesman said.
In 2007, 23% of Peninsular Malaysia's gas demand was met through imports. By Petronas' estimates, demand that already outstrips
supply will grow to 4,900mmscf (million standard cubic feet) per day by 2027. Meanwhile, gas supply from offshore Terengganu
can only be sustained at 2,000 mmscf per day (see chart).
Amirsham, at Friday's announcement, had said the issue was not the subsidy costs to Petronas, which the national petroleum company
could afford, but one of economic viability and sustainability.
“There is not enough gas in any country that you can point to, so it is important we have economic viability (of industries using
the gas),” he said.
128
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
2AC – INDONESIA
5. The US isn’t heavily invested in Indonesian gas anyway, lack of bidding proves
US Embassy, Jakarta Indonesia, 6/23/04, “Indonesia’s Natural Gas Opportunities and Challenges,” Energy News Archives,
http://jakarta.usembassy.gov/download/Natural%20Gas%202003.pdf.
Lastly, Indonesia requires new gas production in order to meet the growing regional and domestic demand. Last year’s four
percent gas production increase falls well short of the GOI’s predicted demand growth of 9-11 percent annually. Private investment
will be the key to new gas production. Unfortunately, investment in new oil/gas exploration and development averaged $1.2
billion for 2001-2003, down from a peak of $2.1 billion in 1998. Although the GOI awarded 15 new exploration tenders in 2003,
up from 1 in 2002 and 6 in 2001, major international and U.S. companies were largely absent from the bidding on these new
oil/gas blocks.
6. Demand satisfied now – new lease means we won’t need gas for 2 years anyway
Jon Hurdle, a freelance writer who has written for many business publications, 7/14/08, “Pa. invites bids for leases on possible gas
field,” Reuters, http://uk.reuters.com/article/oilRpt/idUKN1447555220080714
Pennsylvania officials on Monday invited bids to lease land atop a geological formation that may hold enough natural gas to
meet total U.S. demand for two years.
The state's Department of Conservation and Natural Resources said it will hold a lease sale from pre-qualified bidders for 18 tracts of
state forest totaling some 74,000 acres in two north-central Pennsylvania counties. The bidding will be open until Sept. 2.
The tracts sit over the Marcellus Shale formation, a natural feature about a mile deep that has been known about for years but
which has only recently been suspected of containing massive quantities of natural gas.
The formation, which stretches some 600 miles between western New York State and West Virginia, could contain as much as 50
trillion cubic feet of recoverable natural gas, or enough to supply the entire U.S. for two years, at a wellhead value of $1 trillion,
according to website geology.com.
The recoverable quantity may represent about a tenth of the total gas in the formation, some scientists believe.
The estimates came from Pennsylvania State University geoscience professor Terry Englander and New York State University geology
professor Gary Lash, the website said.
"Given the enormity of the nation's energy demand, making less than an addition 4 percent of our state forest available for
drilling is a reasonable decision that protects our forest ecosystem and helps meet energy demands," DCNR Secretary Michael
DiBerardinis said in a statement.
"This lease sale responds to increased interest in the Marcellus Shale formation, a deep resource thought to contain large
quantities of natural gas," the department's statement said. It noted that new technology and increased natural gas prices have
made it possible to recover hard-to-reach fuel.
129
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
While Indonesia’s oil production capacity continues to dwindle, the country’s natural gas production has remained flat. The US
Department of Energy (DOE) estimates that Indonesia has reserves of 90.5 trillion cubic feet (tcf) and production of 2.5 tcf per year.
Since the country consumes only 50% of its gas production per year, Indonesia has been able to maintain the title of the world’s
leading exporter of liquefied natural gas (LNG). Japan, South Korea and Taiwan are the primary destinations for much of
Indonesia’s LNG exports. Beginning in 2007, Indonesia will export 2.6 million tons of LNG a year to China.
130
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Leonard Doyle, Washington correspondent of 'The Independent', 7/12/08, “The texan oil baron and the winds of change,” The
Independent, http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/the-texan-oil-baron-and-the-winds-of-change-865830.html
Environmentalists are cheering wildly, but the Pickens Plan has little to do with their worries about the catastrophic dangers of global
warming. Mr Pickens has a plan that everyone can get their heads around: He simply wants to end America's addiction to imported
oil and use the country's abundant wind power and natural gas resources to keep the country rolling.
"We're paying $700bn a year for foreign oil," he said. "It's breaking us as a nation, and I want to elevate that question to the
presidential debate, to make it the number one issue of the campaign this year.
"Neither presidential candidate is talking about solving the oil problem. So we're going to make 'em talk about it. Nixon said in 1970
that we were importing 20 per cent of our oil and that by 1980 it would be 0 per cent. That didn't happen. It went to 42 per cent in
1991 with the Gulf War. It's just under 70 per cent now. Where do you think we're going to be in 10 years when our economy is busted
and we're importing 80 per cent of our oil?"
Windy as Sweetwater is, there are places further north in the Great Plains which are more suitable for wind farming. Some 250 miles
away, Mr Pickens is building what is described as the world's largest wind farm.
He has pumped $2bn into the project so far, buying nearly 700 wind turbines from General Electric (GE) and he will spend another
$10bn on the project before it starts generating electricity sometime in 2011.
Filling the Great Plains with wind turbines to produce electricity is only half of the Pickens Plan. He wants to see America's
petrol imports cut back as well by converting cars to run on natural gas. At present most of America's natural gas is used to
produce electricity. Generate electricity from the wind and that can be diverted so that as many as a third of the vehicles will
be running on natural gas within only a few years, he says.
131
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
However, the lobby against ethanol subsidies is growing rapidly. In Britain, the government says it will slow the introduction of
biofuels to address concerns about the impact on food prices.
The World Bank's economist says production of biofuels and the domino effect on grain inventories, export bans, and market
speculation is responsible for 75% of the 140% rise in prices since 2002. This is a stunning estimate when the U.S. Administration
says the impact has been 2% to 3%, and the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization estimates up to 30%.
In Canada, the C.D. Howe Institute waded in with a report that says Canada's biofuels policies are misguided, and are having
unforeseen consequences. More importantly, the report suggests the evidence of the benefit of biofuels on greenhouse gas
emissions is inconclusive. You may not realize that ethanol production requires substantial energy consumption, primarily
natural gas.
132
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Though LNG exports will remain an important component of Indonesia’s gas marketing strategy, gas demand will
increasingly shift toward domestic and regional markets. Power needs and cheaper, environmentally-friendly gas will drive
this shift. Short-term growth in domestic use, as evidenced by the jump in gas supply agreements, will be relatively easy.
However, long-term growth will depend on more complex regulatory, legal and security improvements – the overall investment
climate. A turnaround in the investment climate is essential, not only to ease financing and encourage gas development, but to improve
the country’s economic health as well.
133
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
134
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
INDIA-PAKISTAN
135
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
A. The IPI Pipeline deal will succeed amid rising energy cost
India, Pakistan and Iran will sign a deal this month to build a natural gas pipeline to help feed the subcontinent's
desperate need for energy, a major blow to American sanctions against Tehran and a defeat for U.S. influence in South Asia.
The $7.5 billion, 1,700-mile Peace Pipeline (IPI) project would bring gas from the South Pars Gas Fields through Balochistan
(in Western Pakistan) into India. The project has stalled multiple times since first proposed in 1994 due to political tensions,
changing governments, conflicts over prices, and most recently, the weight of American opposition.
The agreement comes amid growing tension between the United States and Iran, which the U.S. has sought to isolate from the
world community. But rising fuel prices and a soaring Indian economy seem to have outweighed America's desires--as
well as a rival plan for a U.S.-backed pipeline from Turkmenistan.
Ryan Wiser, Mark Bolinger, Matt St. Clair, Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, January
2005, <<http://www.osti.gov/energycitations/servlets/purl/838985-WxPCpP/native/838985.PDF>>
*[Paraphrased: One acronym expanded for clarity].
It is not clear whether today’s inflated natural gas prices represent merely a short-term imbalance between supply and demand or a
longer-term effect that reflects the true marginal cost of production (see, e.g., EMF 2003; Henning, Sloan & de Leon 2003; Holtberg
2002; NPC 2003a).5 In either case, economic theory predicts that a reduction in natural gas demand, whether caused by enhanced
electricity or natural gas efficiency or by increased deployment of R[enewable] E[nergy]*, will generally lead to a reduction in the
price of natural gas relative to the price that would have been expected under higher-demand conditions.6
136
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Shiv Kumar Verma, Political Geography Division, Center for International Politics, Organization and
Disarmament, School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. 06-07. “Energy
geopolitics and Iran–Pakistan–India gas pipeline,” Energy Policy, Volume 35, Issue 6, pp. 3280-3301.
[Takumi Murayama]
The political environment in South Asia is marked by an ambience of hope and anticipation. We are witnessing the most
intensive diplomatic engagement between Pakistan and India since the military stand off of 2001–2002. From the depths of
confrontation and crises, Pakistan and India have been able to take a series of confidence-building measures (CBMs) to
establish a modicum of stability to their relations. Five features mark the new environment. First, there is a strong popular
sentiment for peace in both countries and new stakeholders for peace have emerged. Second, there is a manifest sense in both
countries that there is no military solution to the Jammu and Kashmir dispute or other problems. Third, there is recognition at
both popular and official levels that neither country can achieve its full economic potential or achieve prosperity for its people,
while engaged in confrontation. Fourth, the two countries realize that they need to carefully manage their relations in a
nuclearized environment. Fifth, globalization is unleashing new dynamics and creating imperatives for cooperation, reshaping
Pakistani and Indian political perceptions. The strategic relationship between Pakistan and India remains undefined and
unstable. Pakistan has proposed a strategic restraint regime to define and stabilize this strategic relationship, both in the nuclear
and conventional fields, based on the concept of minimum deterrence. The future of the dialogue and stability in South Asia
depends on whether the two countries can address and overcome their divergences, especially on Kashmir and the
nuclear–military balance, and build on the areas of convergence-trade, regional economic cooperation, and North–South
issues. The Indo-US nuclear deal has raised serious questions for regional stability. Under the agreement, a large number of
facilities and reactor including breeder reactors will be maintained outside safeguards, which will encourage India to continue
and even accelerate its weapons program without any constraint or inhibition. This threatens to erode minimum nuclear
deterrence and strategic stability as proposed by Pakistan. It could also trigger a new arms race in our region. A package
approach for India and Pakistan, rather than the discriminatory one being pursued, would help to avert a nuclear arms in the
region, promote restraint and preserve strategic stability while also ensuring that the legitimate needs of both countries for
civilian power generation are met. A stable nuclear strategic relationship is essential for normal relations between India and
Pakistan. A balance in conventional weapons is also an essential component of sustainable stability (Lodhi, 2006). As far as the
IPI gas pipeline project is concerned, the Indian government is committed to favor this project in the current situation in the
aftermath of the Indo-US nuclear deal and the prevailing nuclear scenario in Iran. The impetus is India's long-term energy
demand. The Indo-Iran pipeline project has such broad geopolitical ramifications that it would be prefer or favor this
project. 1. It would be a financially viable alternative. 2. India and Pakistan will experience the necessary burden of
mutual dependency for the first time in decades. Iran will get to develop a stable and secure export market for its natural
gas. 3. The IPI pipeline might become the catalyst for a wider network of pipelines crisscrossing the Asian heartland and
connecting areas of supply with areas of demand in a manner unmediated by outside influence. 4. The involvement of Pakistan
in this project is not a problem. But an opportunity for India because involving Pakistan in a trilateral or even multilateral
energy grid is an excellent way of raising the level of economic interactions between the two neighbors who have
traditionally been at loggerheads with each other (Varadarajan, 2006). 5. For Iran, the Indo-Iran pipeline project offers not
only a long-term potential markets for its natural gas resources, but it also confers upon Iran a strategic value. 6.
Moreover, the levels of competition have intensified in the global gas industry after years of mergers in energy sector against a
background of emerging markets. In this regard, the stakes to export natural gas to emerging markets, such as India and China,
are high. Like others, Iran's natural gas industry is also facing serious challenges on its export front from Russia, Qatar, and
Turkmenistan. Faced with stiff competition from other pipeline gas projects, the countries in the region are hurrying up to
negotiate the long-term gas pipeline projects (S. Pandian, 2005 and Pandian, 2005). 7. India will also be keen to resolve the
issue of the tri-nation gas pipeline. Despite considerable US displeasure and pressure tactics, India has been committed to the
idea of strengthening energy cooperation with Iran. Until such time as the pipeline becomes a financially feasible proposition,
India is prepared to increase the quantity of gas imports from Iran (Kumaraswamy, 2006). Significantly, gas export is a two-
way trade and India is not the only beneficiary. A broad picture of India's energy diplomacy vis-à-vis countries like Qatar,
Saudi Arabia, and Russia might indicate that Iran would also be a loser if the gas deal falls through. A detailed outlook of
the extent of Indian investment plans in other parts of the world might convince Iran. And though important, it is not India's
only option. While it is legitimate for Iran to demand a higher $7.2/mbtu price for gas it wants to sell to India and Pakistan,
137
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
India is, however, willing to pay no more than $4.2/mbtu for gas delivered at its border. Iran will not sell its gas at the proposed
price. According to Tehran, if the Indian side is not ready to buy its gas at its real price, it has no obligation to sell it at the price
lower than the real one. But India will not favor to be dictated to. Not by US and not by Iran. 8. The importance of nuclear
power, which has become an economic commodity because of the high price of oil and fear of further rise. In such a context
the US has offered its cooperation to India in the civilian nuclear field after eight nuclear reactors have been excluded from the
civilian sphere. The US has also agreed to offer nuclear fuel for power production to India. But Pakistan will not be offered
such a facility by the US in view of its proliferation record, said the US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice while in Pakistan.
The US Secretary for Energy Samuel Boodman who led the delegation to Pakistan immediately after President Bush's visit,
said: India's needs are different, its problems are different and its programs are different. And he advised Pakistan to get gas not
from Iran, but from Qatar at a cost of $8 billion for the pipeline. 9. Energy security has become a question of national strategy.
It is an issue of great importance, and so once again today. But the subject now needs to be rethought, for what has been the
paradigm of energy security for the past three decades is too limited and must be expanded to include many new factors.
Moreover, it must be recognized that energy security does not stand by itself but is lodged in the larger relations among nations
and how they interact with one another. But it is also fueled by the threat of terrorism, instability in some exporting nations, a
nationalist backlash, fears of a scramble for supplies, geopolitical rivalries, and countries fundamental need for energy to power
their economic growth (Yergin, 2006). However, India, wary of the physical security of the on-land pipeline, sought a
guarantee from Iran that, if Pakistan stooped the gas supply in case of an armed conflict, Iran will supply an equal amount of
LNG to India at the same price. In return, Tehran has agreed both to supply an equal amount of LNG to India at the same price
in times of supply disruption, as well as to stop delivery of gas to Pakistan if Islamabad disrupts gas supplies to India. Iran also
proposed setting up an international consortium of bankers and energy companies that would buy the gas from Iran and sell it
to India. To ensure uninterrupted energy supply, it also suggested a tripartite agreement between India, Iran, and Pakistan with
the inclusion of global financial institutions such as the World Bank and Asian Development Bank as guarantors. Furthermore,
it was suggested that Islamabad’ s expectations of substantial transit fees was a reasonable enough guarantee against sabotage
by Pakistan (S.G. Pandian, 2005 and Pandian, 2005)
138
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
S. G. Pandian, School of Business, University of Hull. 09/05. “Energy trade as a confidence-building measure
between India and Pakistan: a study of the Indo-Iran trans-Pakistan pipeline project,” Contemporary South
Asia 14(3), p. 312. [Takumi Murayama]
To ensure that its energy strategy revolves around its long-term objectives, India has considered various options to import
natural gas either through pipelines or as LNG. The leading pipeline proposals, mostly trans-border in nature, include the
importation of natural gas through pipelines from Iran, Oman, Qatar, Turkmeni- stan, Bangladesh and Burma (see Table 3).
Among these projects, the Indo-Iran gas pipeline is under serious consideration by India (see below). However, India also
has considered other proposals seriously, including one for a pipeline from Oman.25 Although India signed an agreement
with Oman in 1994 for the import of gas by a sub-sea pipeline, the project eventually failed to materialise because of the high
costs involved and the inability of the gulf state to meet India’s long-term demand.26 Similarly, Unocal has shelved its
ambitious project proposal to construct a pipeline connecting its natural gas fields in eastern Bangladesh to the Indian capital
of Delhi due to political opposition in the former. Although an overland pipeline from Myanmar is a viable option, the pipeline
would have to pass through Bangladesh territory. As it was reported that Bangladesh wanted to buy natural gas from Myanmar
to store it for themselves (to ensure the stock levels for 50 years) as well as to make profit out of re-selling Myanmar gas to
India,27 it is difficult to see why it would allow a pipeline from Myanmar to pass through its territory to India. Although there
are plans for an undersea gas pipeline between Myanmar and India, bypassing Bangladesh,28 it is unlikely to materialise
given the high cost involved. India’s indifference to a trans-Afghan pipeline project has raised questions about the
viability of the project. In the end, only the Iranian gas pipeline proposal has caught the attention of Indian policy-
makers as other proposals are considered uneconomic and/or politically impossible.
139
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Siddharth Srivastava, New Delhi-based journalist. 07/27/06. “Price imbroglio stymies Iran pipeline,” Asia
Times. http://www.atimes.com/atimes/south_asia/hg27df02.html [Takumi Murayama]
In this context, India has been encouraging power and fertilizer plants to switch from naphtha to cheaper natural gas to
cut costs. This has led to a surge in demand as domestic gas production accounts for just half of the country's
consumption.
Recently, the state-run Indian Farmers Fertilizer Cooperative switched a fertilizer unit to run on natural gas instead of naphtha
to save on energy costs. The firm has already tied up with the state-run Gas Authority of India Ltd (GAIL) to supply gas from
GAIL's main west-north Hazira-Bijaipur-Jagdishpur (HBJ) pipeline. The fertilizer unit in Phulpur is one of the largest in the
country and produces about 1.42 million tons of urea annually.
The push for gas continues on other fronts as well. One of the biggest and most significant discoveries in the
hydrocarbon sector in India took place on June 17, 2005, when the state-owned Gujarat State Petroleum Corp (GSPC)
consortium struck gas at its Krishna-Godavari No 8 well in the KG Block off the coast of Andhra Pradesh.
The well has an estimated reserve of 20 trillion cubic feet (tcf), which makes it the largest gas reserve of India, the value of
which is estimated to be Rs2 trillion ($42.6 billion) per the current rate of natural gas. The daily production is estimated to be in
the range of 65 million to 70 million standard cubic feet per day, which is equivalent to India's current total natural-gas
production. According to one estimate, the power produced by the gas from the GSPC find will be sufficient to meet the peak
energy requirements of Delhi and Mumbai.
The GSPC find eclipsed the 14tcf discovery, also in the KG Basin, in 2002 by Reliance Industries. Last month GSPC
announced that it had found another huge reserve of high-quality oil and gas from the KG basin. The reserve found in the well
KG17 has a gas flow of 4.8 million standard cubic feet per day and an oil flow of 862 barrels per day. The actual viability of
the announcements is being verified by the federal Directorate of Hydrocarbons.
However, India's current gas reserves of 82tcf are insufficient to meet soaring demand for fuel from power stations as
well as buses and taxis that have converted to natural gas in India's cities. Imports are essential.
140
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Dr. Anjali Sahay Visiting Assistant Professor,PhD( Old Dominion University) AND Dr. Jalil Roshandel Associate Professor,
PhD.(Universite des Science Sociales, Tolouse, France) March 28th 2008 Iran, Pakistan, India Natural Gas Pipeline: Implications and
Challenges for the United States
In the case of Iran-India-Pakistan the same level of determination exists within the Iranian leadership, but it confronts
impediments that are less visible in Iran-Swiss deal. Islamic values and what the Iranian leadership has preached all through the
past 30 years becomes more noticeable in dealing with a Muslim country like Pakistan. Pakistanis political orientation that has
put them in close relation with the U.S. might a concern for the Iranians. Iran was also very unhappy with the Indian behavior
and votes against Iran at the IAEA’s Board of Governors meetings. In both cases India voted against Iran first in 2005 to
condemn Iran for violation of its obligations under the NPT and again to report Iran’s file to the UN Security Council in 2006.
29 Elsewhere, Iran signed an agreement yesterday on setting up a planned 300,000 barrels per day oil refinery joint venture in
Indonesia, together with a Malaysian partner. While this trend within the Indian polity (partially affected by Indo-US Relations)
is an unfortunate development and often time criticized by the Iranian conservative trend, but the Iranians are hopeful that the
“left” in India will push for more friendly ties with Iran. They are confident that economic interest inherent in the gas pipeline
deal is strong enough to neutralize U.S. pressure on India.
141
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Shiv Kumar Verma, Political Geography Division, Center for International Politics, Organization and
Disarmament, School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. 06-07. “Energy
geopolitics and Iran–Pakistan–India gas pipeline,” Energy Policy, Volume 35, Issue 6, pp. 3280-3301.
[Takumi Murayama]
While international pipeline activity has shown relatively slow growth over 2003–2005, proposed additions in 2006–2008
could result in a record number of new pipeline miles. Much of the interest in completing languishing planned projects will
be rekindled by higher oil and gas prices, increased demand in developing nations, and the outlook for LNG's role in
the US, Europe and other developing gas markets. Supporting this is the recently released BP 2005 Statistical Review of
World Energy (Tubb, 2005). The Review indicates much of the recent demand for oil and gas was fueled by Asia, especially
India and China, where Chinese consumption rose by 900,000 bpd, almost all of which was accounted for by imports. On
natural gas, the review notes that international trade rose 9% in 2004. Pipeline shipments rose by more than 10%. Russia
accounted for the largest increment, but growth was widely distributed across the world. Shipments of LNG rose by 5.4% last
year, slightly below 2003. A strong energy consumption not only in China, but all developing nations, is reported in
Exxonmobil's 2004 Corporate Citizenship Report. As the data show, by 2030, energy demand will grow by 50%. Close to 80%
of the energy demand increase will occur in developing nations. Europe is also an emerging gas market. Indigenous supply
cannot keeps up with demand and future gas supplies will be piped in from much greater distances. It is suggested that India's
economic interest in the Indo-Iran pipeline project be in conflict with Pakistan's geo-strategic interests. As India view that
Pakistan's geo-strategic interests are aimed at disrupting Indian economic interests, the Indo-Iran pipeline project could hardly
be conducive to sustain confidence between India and Pakistan. In this regard, it is unlikely that India would entertain
Pakistan's role in Indo-Iran pipeline project. Only upon mutual co-existence with India, Pakistan could benefit from its geo-
strategic location.
The pipeline relies on the price of gas against alternative fuel prices
Bruce Loudon, Australian's South Asia correspondent. 05/18/07. “Iran-India pipeline infuriates US,” The
Australian, p. 22.
THE controversial $10 billion Iran-Pakistan-India gas pipeline project that is being so strenuously opposed by the United
States has been found to be technically feasible, but its economic viability now depends of pricing arrangements with
Tehran, according to information disclosed in New Delhi last night.
India's minister of state for petroleum and natural gas, Dinsha Patel, told members of the country's upper house of parliament,
the Rajya Sabha, that the project had been found to be feasible.
The price of gas against alternative fuel prices will determine the viability of the pipeline project.
142
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Siddharth Srivastava, New Delhi-based journalist. 07/27/06. “Price imbroglio stymies Iran pipeline,” Asia
Times. http://www.atimes.com/atimes/south_asia/hg27df02.html [Takumi Murayama]
Tehran is demanding $7.20 per million British thermal units, linked to global crude-oil prices. The Iranian position is
considerably higher than India's offer of $4.25 per mBtu at its border with Pakistan. Though Pakistan has been voicing plans of
going it alone in case India decides to drop out, that may not happen if the price issue is not resolved.
Iran has rejected India's demand for a price equivalent to international long-term gas-supply contracts, saying that New
Delhi should forget about buying Iranian gas at a low price. Tehran's stand has been emboldened by a Europe desperately
seeking other sources of gas after last year's crisis due to the spat between Russia and Ukraine.
Iranian Oil Minister Kazem Vaziri-Hamaneh characterized the Indian offer as based on "subsidized domestic prices"
and said that Tehran will not sell its gas at the proposed price. Iran has forwarded a gas-pricing formula linked to Brent
crude oil with a fixed escalating cost component.
Kaveh L Afrasiabi, PhD in political science, specializing in Iran’s foreign and nuclear affairs at the Center For
Strategic Research. 07/10/07. “A blockage in the peace pipeline,” Asia Times.
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/IG10Df01.html [Takumi Murayama]
Unofficially, there is a great deal of grumbling on the part of Iranian officials and energy experts about the generous
discount by Iran to India - approximately a third below the average global prices. This is mainly because of two things. First,
India has bargained hard, always maintaining the position that the gas price should be based on Iran's consideration of "India's
ability to pay" and not simply market considerations.
Second, Iran has agreed to lower the price in light of the perceived geopolitical dividend of the IPI, in bringing the
subcontinent closer to Iran at a critical time when the US-led pressure on Iran over the nuclear row and regional issues is
intensifying.
But not all Iranian energy and political experts agree that Iran must necessarily agree to such "political prices," to echo
a former official of Iran's Oil Ministry who recently told the author that India has no viable alternative and has such a dire
energy need that it would be "shooting itself in the knee if it walked away from this deal".
Nor is it entirely clear that the IPI deal would cause any dramatic shift in New Delhi's foreign policy, notwithstanding India's
vote against Iran at the International Atomic Energy Agency and the US-India nuclear deal that, if implemented, would cement
the strategic partnership between Washington and New Delhi. There is, after all, nearly always a bit of disjunction or lack of fit
between economic and geostrategic considerations, as can be clearly seen in the current US-China relations.
As a result, once we peel away the surface, the price "hiccup" in the IPI agreement appears to be as much over Iran's
concern about regulating the price adjustments in the future as over its present underlying unhappiness and/or
hesitations about the overly generous "special price" of the IPI pipeline. The longer the delay in the final agreement, the
more that hesitation is likely to manifest itself. That's all the more reason for India in particular to act smart about it and not let
this hiccup turn terminal.
143
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Sushma Ramachandran, economic and corporate analyst. 07/02/07. “Pipeline - A Pipedream For the Time
Being,” Boloji. http://www.boloji.com/analysis2/0224.htm [Takumi Murayama]
Similarly, there is a feeling that Iran's obduracy on seeking high gas prices could be linked to India having voted against
that country on the nuclear issue at the multilateral arena. This contentious issue is clearly an underlying motif in many
bilateral discussions with Iran. There are therefore umpteen unresolved issues relating to the IPI pipeline. It is thus quite
likely to remain a pipedream for some time to come.
The Hindu Business Line. 07/23/06. “Pricing issue looms over IPI pipeline project.”
http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2006/07/24/stories/2006072402190300.htm [Takumi Murayama]
The trilateral talks scheduled for August 3-4 between Iran, Pakistan and India on the multi-billion dollar gas pipeline project is
set to see some tough negotiation between the three nations on the gas pricing issue. With Iran declining to sell gas to India
at the price proposed by New Delhi, and India reluctant to revise its offer much, there is apprehension in the Petroleum
Ministry that the pricing issue would be crucial to deliberations on the project.
144
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Neil Ford April, 2004, Journalist for The Middle East, Which way for Iranian gas? With global demand for gas
increasing, Iran—home of the World's second largest reserves—is poised to become an important provider,
findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2742/is_344/ai_n25086986/pg_2?tag=artBody;col1
Iran is so keen to get the project off the ground it has offered to supply 60% of the estimated $3bn construction costs. The latest
proposal to be mooted was the construction of a 1,600km pipeline to Pakistan, with the potential to extend it to India at a later
dare. But the smaller volumes required by Pakistan alone will probably nor justify the costs involved. The Indian government is
currently believed to be considering the viability of an LNG deal with Iran. The country embarked upon a mass LNG
programme in the 1990s but contractual and financing problems have left some terminals in limbo.
145
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Neil Ford April, 2004, Journalist for The Middle East, Which way for Iranian gas? With global demand for gas
increasing, Iran—home of the World's second largest reserves—is poised to become an important provider,
findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2742/is_344/ai_n25086986/pg_2?tag=artBody;col1
A number of major buy back deals have been signed over the past seven years enabling growth in the gas sector. Yet despite the
strides that have been made to promote domestic consumption and export, only a tiny fraction of Iran's gas potential has so
far been developed. Most gas production comes from associated reserves on oil and gas fields, but over 60% of the country's 812
trillion cubic feet of gas reserves is located on non-associated fields, which remain largely unexploited. Russian state gas company
Gazprom has offered to set up a joint venture with Iranian parastatals in order to make the most the country's reserves and gas could
even be exported utilising Russia's vast gas transportation network.
146
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Anjali Sahay Visiting Assistant Professor,PhD( Old Dominion University) AND Dr. Jalil Roshandel Associate Professor,
PhD.(Universite des Science Sociales, Tolouse, France) March 28th 2008 Iran, Pakistan, India Natural Gas Pipeline: Implications and
Challenges for the United States
Undoubtedly, India has vast reserves of the nuclear fuel thorium but technology is not yet developed for its commercial use.
Furthermore, a lot would depend on the Indo-US nuclear energy cooperation deal before it can significantly contribute towards
India’s energy sector. Since India is a relatively new entrant into the natural gas market when compared to other mature NG
based economies like Japan, Korea, and the United States, and its share of to energy needs in India is only 9 percent, it
becomes natural for India to find outside sources of natural gas. Cross-border gas pipelines that are still facing uncertainties
include NG pipelines with Myanmar, Turkmenistan, and Iran. Although these have been under discussion for quite some time,
the political climate remains unfavorable, thus delaying these projects indefinitely. Arguably, even when they do materialize,
the country may face potential supply disruption if political issues emerge over medium term.
Ariel Cohen, Ph.D., Senior Research Fellow in Russian and Eurasian Studies and International Energy
Security in the Douglas and Sarah Allison Center for Foreign Policy Studies, Lisa Curtis, Senior Research
Fellow for South Asia in the Asian Studies Center, and Owen Graham, Research Assistant in the Allison
Center at The Heritage Foundation. 05/30/08. “The Proposed Iran-Pakistan-India Gas Pipeline: An
Unacceptable Risk to Regional Security,” Heritage. [Takumi Murayama]
India generates 70 percent of its electric power and 50 percent of its total energy from coal.[13] Indian policymakers have
been working to diver sify away from coal because Indian coal is extremely dirty and has low caloric value. India's soft coal
produces about twice as much ash and particulate matter as U.S. coal produces. Gas-pow ered plants are much cleaner and
more efficient, especially given the rising costs of emission-control equipment. Increasing dependence on gas has made
demand for natural gas in India rise faster than demand for any other energy source.
Most of India's domestic sources of gas are used in the expanding electricity sector. As of January 2007, India had 38 trillion
cubic feet of proven natural gas reserves.[14] In addition to current stocks, several re cent discoveries in the Bay of Bengal
have added to India's known domestic reserves. Despite these finds, India's gas reserves are insufficient to meet its growing
demand, and India will rely increasingly on gas imports.
India's LNG Portfolio
India produces approximately 80 million cubic meters (mcm) of natu ral gas per day, but domestic demand is 170 mcm per
day.[15] Thus, India must import approximately 90 mcm per day. According to energy con sultants Wood Mackenzie,
Indian demand for natural gas is rising 8 percent per year and will reach 270 mcm per day by 2020. "Around 200 [mcm
per day] of this is likely to come from a mixture of state-con trolled capped-price production, pri vate-sector production and
already-contracted LNG supplies, which leaves a gap of more than 55 [mcm per day], which could be filled by LNG imports."
[16]
147
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
S. G. Pandian, School of Business, University of Hull. 09/05. “Energy trade as a confidence-building measure
between India and Pakistan: a study of the Indo-Iran trans-Pakistan pipeline project,” Contemporary South
Asia 14(3), pp. 310-311. [Takumi Murayama]
On the basis of natural gas’ competitive position among various energy sources, it is becoming increasingly apparent that it
will be the preferred fuel in future Indian power generation. As the country’s energy economists and policy-makers favour
the use of gas, there is a concerted effort to replace coal and eventually direct the national fuel requirements towards natural
gas. Although natural gas accounted for 7% of primary energy consumption in 1997–98, it is set to increase to 20% by
2025 (see Table 2). However, India’s conventional natural gas resources are limited and unlikely to meet its growing
demand.16 The demand for natural gas is growing at about 260 million cubic meters per day (mmcmd),17 and is expected
to rise to 231 mmcmd by 2006–07 and to 313 mmcmd by 2011–12.18 That compares with current domestic production, mainly
through the state-owned Oil & Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC), of only 60 mmcmd, a number that is projected to remain flat
for the foreseeable future.19
Although new natural gas reserve finds would be helpful in meeting the rise in demand, they may not be sufficient to replace
the gas import option. Thus, while a natural gas reserve find in the Krishna-Godavari basin by Reliance-Niko partners has
revived a debate on the scope of domestic natural gas reserves in meeting India’s hopes of attaining self-sufficiency in the
energy sector, energy experts are divided on the impact of this find on the country’s energy economics. However, it is important
to highlight that the natural gas reserve find in the Krishna-Godavari block is not significant enough to review import options.
Although the joint venture partners pegged the gas reserves at 7 trillion cubic feet (tcf)), the projected gas production is
expected to be 1.4 billion cubic feet per day by 2005–06.20 As the demand for natural gas is expected to rise to 231 mmcmd by
this time, Reliance-Niko’s natural gas supply could contribute only 17% of India’s domestic demand. Given that the domestic
natural gas supply is not likely to keep pace with domestic demand, India will have to import most of its natural gas
requirement.
148
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
India’s energy strategy is aimed at ensuring its aspiration to diversify its economy from pre-dominantly oil and coal-based to a
multi-fuel one. As of now, the country generates around 50% of its electricity from coal-fired power plants, around 32% from
oil and the rest from natural gas, hydroelectric and nuclear resources.21 However, with India’s coal and crude oil production
showing signs of stagnation and its long-term projections showing increased energy consumption, additional power
requirements will have to be met through alternative energy resources. Since the capacity addition through thermal,
hydroelectric and nuclear resources is unable to keep pace with the rapidly increasing demand for electricity, India has
decided to make natural gas the fuel of choice for future electric power generation projects.22 Indeed, the country’s
consumption of natural gas has risen faster than any other fuel in recent years, from only 0.6 tcf per year in 1995 to a projected
1.8 tcf in 2010.23
India’s willingness to diversify its energy sources stems, in part, from its vulnerability to regional conflicts disrupting energy
supplies. Every major conflict in the Middle East has resulted in a serious disruption of energy supplies and therefore higher oil
prices for India.24 Since the bulk of the country’s energy supply originates from the Middle East, any future conflicts and/or
political realignments in the region may only exacerbate the problems of India’s energy security. However, unlike the oil trade,
which is regulated by the cartel rules of the Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), trade in natural gas is
unregulated. Hence, there is room for considerable flexibility in fixing natural gas prices through long-term contracts.
BBC Monitoring South Asia. 07/04/08. “India likely to host next meeting on four-nation pipeline issue.”
[Takumi Murayama]
India's current gas supplies of 91 mmscmd, including imported liquefied natural gas, fall short of
potential demand of 170 million cubic meters. Demand may quadruple to 400 million cubic meters a
day by 2025 if the economy grows at the projected rate of 7 to 8 per cent a year.
149
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
N.S. Murthy, M. Panda, and J. Parikh, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research (IGIDR). 05/97.
“Economic growth, energy demand and carbon dioxide emissions in India: 1990-2020,” Environment and
Development Economics, Vol. 2 Issue 2, pp. 175-176. [Takumi Murayama]
The trends in consumption of primary commercial energy are shown in Table 1. Figure 1 illustrates the same trends but in
comparable energy units. The share of oil and gas in the total consumption of primary com- mercial energy has increased
between 1950–1 and 1990–1, whereas the share of coal has declined. Yet coal continues to be the main source not only of the
primary commercial energy used by industry, but also of the secondary energy used through the consumption of electricity.
Recent years have witnessed a significant increase in the production and consumption of oil and natural gas. In 1990–1, India
imported nearly 40% of the total of 54 million tonnes (mt) of crude oil that it consumed. In addition, about 6 mt of petroleum
products were imported directly. Natural gas is likely to play a more important role than before in providing energy in the
coming years. The production of electrical energy from hydroelectric sources has also risen steadily over the years, but its
overall share in total primary energy has declined. Additions to the nuclear-based electric power generation capacity have been
relatively modest.
150
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
151
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Impacts – Stability
IPI Pipeline key to regional stability and conflict resolution
Shamila N. Chaudhary, American University – Trade and Environment Database, Iran to India Natural Gas
Pipeline:Implications for Conflict Resolution & Regionalism in India, Iran, and Pakistan, 2000,
www.american.edu/ted/iranpipeline.htm
The exportation of natural gas from Iran to India through Pakistan is a venture which may change the face of regional politics
in South Asia. It is a study in how economic collaboration possesses the power to engender as well as transform social and
political discourse between countries. The Indian government speculated whether Pakistan could guarantee security for the
flow of natural gas in the pipeline. Furthermore, Pakistan's collaboration with Iran may foster conflict resolution as well. In
the past, Iranian and Pakistani foreign policies have disagreed on the issues of Afghanistan and Shi'a-Sunni conflicts in the
region. Thus, trade and the larger experience of economic globalization posesses the ability to exist as mediators in conflicts in
the region and between regions.
Natural gas trade between India, Iran, and Pakistan challenges the geopolitical, historical, and strategic realities of the three
countries and the general regions of the Mideast and Asia. In this way, the relationship between the pipeline venture and
globalization is multidisciplinary. It is not characterized solely by economic factors, even though the current economic realities
in Iran, India, and Pakistan do foreshadow the future necessity of economic collaboration. The realities of this case study are
representative of the notion that multidisciplinary globalization is changing the face of regional politics and altering the social
and political landscape of regions.
152
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Dr. Ali Mostashari, Strategic Initiatives Advisor, UN Development; and Research Affiliate, MIT. 01~03/07.
“The Political Economy of the Iran-Pakistan-India Gas Pipeline,” Iran Analysis Quarterly Vol. 4 Number 1, p.
30. [Takumi Murayama]
For Iran, the project would provide both a new energy market as well as potential political support from India in the
current nuclear crisis. Therefore, Iran has not refrained from providing open incentives for the deal to go through. In 2005,
Iran had awarded Indian gas companies major energy contracts in the order of $40 billion (Asia Times Online, January 11,
2005). Improvement of relations with Pakistan is also an important plus for the project from Tehran’s perspective. By
strengthening its ties with Pakistan, one of America’s closest allies in the region, Iran could ensure that sufficient in- betweens
exist in times of crisis. Additionally, given the ethnic and religious unrest in Iran’s eastern borders with Pakistan, Iran wants to
ensure that Pakistan has an equal interest in stability in the Baluchestan area, and discouraging any incentives for support to
separatist Sunni groups.
153
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Impacts – CBMs
IPI Pipeline key to regional confidence building measures
Dr. Ali Mostashari, Strategic Initiatives Advisor, UN Development; and Research Affiliate, MIT. 01~03/07.
“The Political Economy of the Iran-Pakistan-India Gas Pipeline,” Iran Analysis Quarterly Vol. 4 Number 1, p.
30. [Takumi Murayama]
From the perspective of India, there are major economic interests in securing energy supplies in an increasingly tight market.
India's demand for natural gas is projected to grow from 49 billion cubic meters (bcm) in 2006-07 to 125 bcm by 2024-25.
India’s options to meet this demand are essentially two-folds: the IPI pipeline or the alternative Turkmenistan-
Afghanistan-Pakistan (TAP) pipeline to which India was formally invited to join in February 2006. The TAP, while a
politically easier option, may be problematic because of safety concerns when it passes through Afghanistan, and the potential
inadequacy of Turkmen natural gas resources to provide for India’s demand in the longer term. Pakistan also regards the deal
positively, because it would not only guarantee a source of income for them, but also increase stability in the region. Pakistani
Prime Minister Shaukat Aziz was quoted as saying that “the Iran-Pakistan-India gas pipeline is a win-win proposition for
Iran, India, and Pakistan that could serve as a durable confidence-building measure, creating strong economic links
and business partnerships among the three countries”.
154
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Dr. Ali Mostashari, Strategic Initiatives Advisor, UN Development; and Research Affiliate, MIT. 01~03/07.
“The Political Economy of the Iran-Pakistan-India Gas Pipeline,” Iran Analysis Quarterly Vol. 4 Number 1, pp.
32-33. [Takumi Murayama]
Now more than ever, decisions in the energy market are more about political economy than economic realities. Iran’s isolation
by the West has pushed its trade strategies towards Russia, India and China. In the same way, Iran has tried to use its control
over substantial energy reserves and its ability to disrupt energy transit routes as a defensive way to deter U.S. and Israeli
military and economic action, it is trying to use the same assets to expand its trade with India, China and Pakistan. If the
proposed Iran-Pakistan-India (IPI) project is successful, Iran would be presented with the opportunity to expand its
trade ties with other nations in the region to go beyond the energy provider role and circumvent the threat of unilateral
economic sanctions by Europe and the United States.
The pipeline could also be expanded to other countries in the region, expanding Iran’s reach into hitherto untapped markets. On
the other hand, if the IPI project fails, the near-term prospects for Iran’s Eastward shift become severely limited.
In the longer term and thinking beyond the current power structure, an Eastward shift, whether through this project or others
can help diversify Iran’s trade portfolio and open up new markets for Iran’s non-energy based products. Given the long-
term investment in such a project, the result may favor Iran’s national interest beyond the existing power structure. Conversely,
if the Eastward shift fails to materialize, it will be a grave setback for Iran with negative economic and social impacts
beyond the current context.
Neil Ford April, 2004, Journalist for The Middle East, Which way for Iranian gas? With global demand for gas
increasing, Iran—home of the World's second largest reserves—is poised to become an important provider,
findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2742/is_344/ai_n25086986/pg_2?tag=artBody;col1
With the world's second biggest gas reserves, Iran has long threatened to become a major player in the international gas market.
Global demand is rising relentlessly and the country is well placed to supply markets in East Asia and the European Union
(EU). However, a combination of regional geopolitical problems and domestic affairs has slowed the development of the
sector.
Iran's internal struggle over economic reform and liberalisation has prevented the introduction of changes to the constitution
and the investment environment that would allow private companies to play a large role in developing Iran's gas resources. The
state owned National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC), is struggling to develop all existing oil discoveries and has commited
billions of dollars to pipeline projects that will take many years to pay off. The support of foreign, private, companies is
required if the many proposed schemes are to get off the ground. This is as true of pipeline projects as it is of liquefied natural
gas (LNG) initiatives.
155
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Impacts – Diplomacy
Pipelines are key to diplomacy, NOT for energy security
Shiv Kumar Verma, Political Geography Division, Center for International Politics, Organization and
Disarmament, School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. 06-07. “Energy
geopolitics and Iran–Pakistan–India gas pipeline,” Energy Policy, Volume 35, Issue 6, pp. 3280-3301.
For India, a country with negligible and rapidly depletable oil resources, it would mean safeguarding and sustaining its
developmental and global power aspirations. A secure but costly form of importing energy would be liquefied natural gas
(LNG), delivered by ship. The seas are international waters. The Indian navy and navies of rich countries will try to ensure
open seas. Even Turkmen gas could be piped down to the Iran coast and liquefied. However, pipelines are less secure. A deep-
water pipeline in international waters, though, is relatively secure and relatively costly. A cheaper pipeline in shallow waters
will pass through the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) of counties and so security will require credible national
guarantees. Such guarantees can be abrogated in times of hostilities. Even onshore pipelines are not entirely secure:
militants and other such irredentist elements operating within national boundaries can blow them up. This has already
happened in Assam and Baluchistan and might happen in tremendously volatile Afghanistan too. Onshore pipelines through
Pakistan may be the cheapest form of transporting gas from Iran and Turkmenistan. But low cost is not security as
conventionally understood. Though important, it cannot be called energy security. The gas pipelines will reduce the cost of
delivered gas compared with transported LNG, but at an increased risk of disruption. Albeit there are modest risks, the
potential diplomatic gains are huge, and so this is a worthwhile diplomatic gamble. But worthwhile gambles are not
security (Challency, 2005). We need to increase the efficiency of thermal power stations, but every 1% increase requires an
additional 5 million tons of coal. Most Indian coal is of low quality. This approach alone will necessitate enormous quantities
of coal needed to feed existing and future power plants and to gasify coal to substitute oil and natural gas.
156
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
S. G. Pandian, School of Business, University of Hull. 09/05. “Energy trade as a confidence-building measure
between India and Pakistan: a study of the Indo-Iran trans-Pakistan pipeline project,” Contemporary South
Asia 14(3), p. 315. [Takumi Murayama]
To address the growing natural gas demand, Pakistan is pursuing various natural gas import options, including the importation
of LNG and natural gas through pipelines from the leading energy suppliers in the Middle East and Central Asia. The
importation of LNG is economically competitive with pipelines only at distances greater than 3000–6000 kilometres.
Therefore, the option to import gas via LNG will be more costly, both in terms of investment and delivery costs of imported
gas.39 Given the cost disadvantage of importing the LNG, Pakistan was considering various pipeline projects. No Pakistan-
centric pipeline would be economically feasible, as the demand growth for gas resources is feeble and unsustainable in
the long-term. The gas pipeline projects in which Pakistan is interested would not materialise unless the desired destination of
the pipelines would be India. Slower demand growth would mean that the Iran–Pakistan and Turkmenistan–Pakistan gas
pipeline projects are commercially not viable, as Pakistan could not absorb the imported gas. In this regard, Pakistan has
concluded that it would be in its interest to provide on-land transit for the Indo-Iran pipeline project. Such a project,
apart from offering an attractive transit fee for the pipeline to pass through its territory, would also offer Pakistan the gas
at subsidised rate to fuel its sluggish industrial growth.
157
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
FARS News Agency. 06/28/08. “Pakistan Steps up Pressure over IPI Pipeline.”
http://english.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn=8704080876 [Takumi Murayama]
But with energy prices going up, Pakistan is clearly looking at the pipeline as a viable energy option. "Energy prices have
gone berserk and all countries are suffering. Subsidies on petroleum products for both countries are immense and contribute
to the fiscal burden. This project can help us mitigate our problems vis-à-vis energy," said Qureshi.
158
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Shiv Kumar Verma, Political Geography Division, Center for International Politics, Organization and
Disarmament, School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. 06-07. “Energy
geopolitics and Iran–Pakistan–India gas pipeline,” Energy Policy, Volume 35, Issue 6, pp. 3280-3301.
The latest positions in Indo-Pak ties clearly put economic factors on the front burner. [The IPI pipeline is likely to cost $7.4
billion mainly due to increase in steel prices. India estimates that the project cost may go to as high as $8.16 billion if there is a
10% escalation in raw material costs over the next 5 years when the project is slated for construction. The capex may come
down to $6.67 billion if there is a 10% decrease in raw material cost.] (Aiyar, 2005a). The real attraction is the US$5 billion
potential in trade through the proposed Iran–India gas pipeline traversing Pakistan. This pipeline is expected to save India
US$300 million a year in energy transport costs, while Pakistan would get an estimated US$700 million in annual transit fees.
However, the stake of Pakistan is very high, if the proposed project passes through Pakistan, as this project would have
enormous implication for Pakistani economy. Pakistan's perennial foreign exchange crisis forced it to concede that it is in its
financial interest to get itself involved in the Indo-Iran gas pipeline project. The pipeline would accrue to Pakistan an
income of $14 billion in 30 years, including $8 billion in transit fee, $1 billion in taxes, and $5 billion in savings (S.
Pandian, 2005 and Pandian, 2005).
Although the transit fee would not wholly redress Pakistan's acute foreign debt crisis, it would partly alleviate this
problem. Finally, Pakistan, like India, suffers from a growing oil-pool deficit. Pakistan's power generation is heavily dependent
on fuel oil, and it is a net oil importer with an oil import bill of over US$1 billion/annum. The country aims to slash its imports
from the Gulf by one-third in order to save at least US$1 billion a year in its annual energy import bill. To reduce the fiscal
strain on the Pakistan's economy, the government has opted for a policy option of substituting fuel oil with natural gas for
power generation, a move expected to save an estimated US$600–700 million/annum. It is estimated that at current levels of
power generation, over 800 mfc/day of additional gas is required to replace fuel oil in all its thermal power plants (S.G.
Pandian, 2005 and Pandian, 2005). In this regard, Pakistan has concluded that it would be in its interest to provide inland
transit for the Indo-Iran pipeline project. Such a project, apart from offering an attractive fee for the pipeline to pass through
its territory, would also offer Pakistan the gas at subsidized rate as local gas comes at the rate of $3.4/million British
thermal unit (mbtu) against imported gas at $5, the difference being is $1.6 mbtu. This difference would be met through
transit fee. Moreover, if gas import plans cannot be implemented and gas supplies remain limited to LNG imports in the next 5
years, the new thermal plants will be based on furnace oil with the provision that these could be switched over to gas at a later
stage. This will, however, put additional foreign exchange burden on the import of fuel. The policy has also clearly defined the
order of priority for all sectors for additional gas supplies. The policy has been prepared on the basis of an integrated analysis
of Wapda and KESC systems scheduled development of hydel, coal, and nuclear energy projects and expected low water
availability during dry period. This situation will remain intact even after materialization of 500 mmcfd (million cubic feet per
day) LNG import by 2010 and hence additional supplies would be diverted to other priority sectors. Moreover, CNG stations,
captive power and general industrial sector will start running short of gas from fiscal year 2015. Pakistan was meeting 18% of
its oil needs from local production and the country had to import the remaining 82% requirements for which it had to pay
international prices. The Pakistan government has incurred losses amounting to Rs. 66 billion by capping the prices over the
past year and would meet 50% of the expected Rs. 4 billion losses even after the new increases. However, Pakistan government
has increased oil prices 114 times in its six years. On the basis of comparative prices local cost of gas comes to $3.4/mBtu
against $5 for imported gas. Gasification of coal will make the cost $5.5/unit, while the cost of the high sulfur fuel oil comes to
about $7.5/unit; fuel oil will cost $8.1/unit, Naptha $ 1.4, and high-speed diesel $12.6/unit. See Table 2 and Table 3.
159
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Shiv Kumar Verma, Political Geography Division, Center for International Politics, Organization and
Disarmament, School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. 06-07. “Energy
geopolitics and Iran–Pakistan–India gas pipeline,” Energy Policy, Volume 35, Issue 6, pp. 3280-3301.
However, the IPI gas pipeline project is significantly about the perceived value of secure energy supplies versus stable prices
and the willingness to eventually pay a security vis-a-vis India's energy concern in the long run. India, would rather prefer to
import gas from Iran. India's interest in the proposed Indo-Iran gas pipeline project is based on the presumption that the
project's long-term prospects are higher than what it would achieve by other options. It would also be in India's interests to
buy gas resources from one source, which is nearer and never-ending, rather than from several sources. Iran claims to have
16%% of the world's gas reserves, enough to last for 500 years at the present rate of exploitation. It is suggested that Iran's
massive natural gas reserves can supply India's gas demands for up to 200 years. For India, the economic feasibility is not
the only criterion but also the safe and continuous supply of gas. In this regard, it is obvious that India's concern for the
safety and security of the pipeline projects takes precedence over the economic viability and technical complexity. The
most important aspect of the pipeline project is the medium of the transfer, which needs to be cost effective and secure.
According to a Broken Hill Proprietary (BHP) study, the supplying of gas via pipeline could save India an estimated US$10
billion over 10 years. It is also suggested that the piped Iranian gas constituted the most affordable long-term energy supply to
India. By facilitating the trans-Pakistan gas pipeline project, Pakistan did not want to act as an instrument in fostering a long-
term relationship between India and Iran, which would obviously challenge and reduce Pakistan's stake in the region. The
benefit of the gas pipeline project with India are long-term as Iran, with huge natural gas reserves, is capable of
addressing India's growing energy crisis. Pakistan expressed its eagerness to participate in the pipeline project because of its
own self-seeking interests. Iran sought to bring in Pakistan as a partner in the pipeline project to ensure an economically
feasible overland transit route. India has sought to repel and play down the role of Pakistan as an equal partner in the project for
the fear of its energy supply being disrupted in case of a military conflict with Pakistan (S. Pandian, 2005 and Pandian, 2005).
Also the domestic social and political atmosphere in Pakistan seems to be in perennial disarray, too volatile to dispel concerns
against its economic stability and instill confidence in the long-term commercial viability of any pipeline passing through its
territory. However, the problem associated with oil and gas security and the Gulf, after all, are of a complexity that demands
comprehensive solutions. Internationalizing al least the energy issues could begin to disengaged the US from the current
slippery slope on which it is increasingly perceived as a regional combatant aggressively pursuing unilateral national and
security interests to the detriment of regional stability. Asian leaders are becoming increasingly worried about their economies
growing dependence on Gulf oil and gas and are likely to be receptive to any multinational initiative that would make supplies
from the region more secure or provide a framework for developing alternatives energy substitutes. However, the fate of the
Iran pipeline is still hanging fire. Apart from US opposition to the project, there are also differences on the pricing of the gas.
The two countries (India and Iran) have also not been able to decide on a price for the pipeline gas. Tehran is seeking at least
$7.2/mBtu price for gas it wants to sell to India and Pakistan through the pipeline, while New Delhi is willing to pay not more
than $4.2/mBtu for its share (Mishra and Goswami, 2006). Furthermore, Pakistan's weak financial position makes it difficult to
secure financing for ambitious pipeline projects. The oil and gas pipeline projects in which Pakistan is interested would not
materialize unless the desired destination of the pipeline would be India and world's second largest market for natural gas.
Therefore, Pakistan’ s willingness to eventually pay a security at the cost of causing overwhelming advantages to India is
doubtful. On the strategic side, it is in India's interests to ensure economic instability in Pakistan. For Iran and Pakistan, the gas
pipeline project has socio-politico-economic and geo-strategic components. The Pakistan economic gains of Iran gas pipeline
project would be a continuous transit income and the option to procure gas at a subsidized rate (S. Pandian, 2005 and Pandian,
2005). Thus the crux of the matter is that there are major politico-strategic factors relating to all the involved players, including
the US, which weigh against the on ground implementation of the project. It is to be seen when such hitherto dominating
irritants get nullified by a cooperative, win–win and predominantly economic approach on the part of these states, especially,
India and Pakistan.
160
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Times of India. 07/12/08. “Natural gas solution, N-power overhyped.” [Takumi Murayama]
The Working Group's report does not give a break-up of thermal capacity, so one does not know how much of the planned
capacity addition is coal-based and how much gas-based. However, it does say, "natural gas is the fastest growing primary
energy source amongst fossil fuels".
It also acknowledges that India is likely to have only about 49 billion cubic metres (BCM) of gas production by the end of the
11th Plan against an estimated demand of about 114 BCM.
"Therefore, it is reasonable to expect that sizable quantity of natural gas would need to be imported to meet the demand in
future, either as LNG or through trans-national pipelines," the Working Group report says.
That would indicate that it is deals like the India-Iran gas pipeline that could really hold the key to India's energy
security. Whether such a deal will be possible in the event of India getting into a strategic embrace with the US, which has
indicated its disapproval of the pipeline project, is another matter.
S. G. Pandian, School of Business, University of Hull. 09/05. “Energy trade as a confidence-building measure
between India and Pakistan: a study of the Indo-Iran trans-Pakistan pipeline project,” Contemporary South
Asia 14(3), p. 317. [Takumi Murayama]
Iranian gas delivered via a trans-Pakistan pipeline will be cheaper than the importation of the LNG. Indeed, at the cost
of US$2.20/2.50 mmbtu, the Iranian gas is expected to be cheaper than anything offered by Petronet.52 There are also reports
of Iranian gas delivered at the Indian border at the cost of $1.80 per mmbtu.53 Moreover, from a cost perspective, a single
natural gas pipeline extending from Iran to India overland through Pakistan would be comparatively cheaper than constructing
two or more independent pipelines from different suppliers. India’s interest in the proposed Indo-Iran gas pipeline project is
based on the presumption that the project’s long-term prospects are better than what it could achieve by other options.
It would also be in India’s interests to buy gas resources from one source that is near and never-ending, rather than from several
sources. Indeed, Iran claims to have 16% of the world’s gas reserves, enough to last for 500 years at the present rate of
exploitation,54 and sufficient to supply India’s gas demands for up to 200 years.55 The trans-Pakistan pipeline project also
offers the best value as compared with other pipeline options and/or the importation of LNG from external sources,
whether single or multiple.56 It is also suggested that the piped Iranian gas constituted the most affordable long-term energy
supply to India, and save the country an estimated US$10 billion over 25 years.57
161
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
S. G. Pandian, School of Business, University of Hull. 09/05. “Energy trade as a confidence-building measure
between India and Pakistan: a study of the Indo-Iran trans-Pakistan pipeline project,” Contemporary South
Asia 14(3), pp. 317-318. [Takumi Murayama]
Any economic CBM requires the actors to benefits in various ways. The proposed Indo-Iran trans-Pakistan pipeline project will
have profound economic implications for India and Pakistan. While the project addresses India’s long-term energy needs, it
significantly improves Pakistan’s economic and geo-strategic interests. It will provide the latter with much-needed foreign
currency in the form of transit fees for the passage of gas through its territories. The pipeline would also provide Pakistan with
the opportunity to obtain cheap gas from the same pipeline. The country’s importance in the region will also improve as a Indo-
Iran pipeline may well encourage similar delivery methods across its territory.
The thaw in Indo-Pakistan relations in recent months has encouraged India to hold talks with Pakistan regarding the
overland pipeline project. India also has agreed to drop its insistence on linking progress on the proposed overland gas
pipeline with trade concessions from Pakistan. Despite these marked developments in Indo-Pakistan bilateral relations, it is
difficult to sustain the situation given broader disagreements between two countries over the issues of Kashmir and terrorism.
The removal of threats in the region requires a reduction of tensions through the creation of CBMs. A pipeline project
involving India and Pakistan would act as a CBM by increasing their economic interdependence. As India has already
extended most favoured nation status to Pakistan without expecting reciprocity, its preference for a trans-Pakistan pipeline
project would further act to gain Islamabad’s confidence. Pakistan Prime Minister Shaukat Aziz has stated that ‘the confidence-
building measures and the dialogue we’ve initiated at all levels is helping to create a conducive atmosphere . . . [and] the
[proposed] pipeline creates linkages and interdependencies and builds trust and interaction’.58
The strategic shift to include Pakistan in the Indo-Iran pipeline project has the capability to forge a new relationship
between India and Pakistan. The trans- Pakistan pipeline has immense potential to create a conducive atmosphere and add
new meaning to the bilateral relationship. Such a relationship would also facilitate India’s long-term commercial
interests in Central Asia. The beneficial effects of trans-Pakistan pipeline project would also spill over into areas such as
commodity trade, science and technology, and human resource development in both India and Pakistan.
162
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
India and Pakistan are both confronted with the problem of an increasing shortage of natural gas. As they have the advantage of
bordering the Persian Gulf and Central Asia, two of the world’s major natural gas rich regions, this geographical proximity
can provide the basis for mutually beneficial economic cooperation between India and Pakistan in energy trade. The trans-
Pakistan pipeline project will draw India and Pakistan closer into an energy partnership and break down barriers
against commercial engagement between the two nations. A pipeline agreement supported by India and protected by
Pakistan against any disruptions of flow would bring political as well as economic benefits. Thus, the trans-Pakistan pipeline
project could be a key CBM in resolving irritants in their political relations, forging and intensifying a new relationship
between India and Pakistan.
S. G. Pandian, School of Business, University of Hull. 09/05. “Energy trade as a confidence-building measure
between India and Pakistan: a study of the Indo-Iran trans-Pakistan pipeline project,” Contemporary South
Asia 14(3), p. 308. [Takumi Murayama]
However, the development of positive institutional arrangements in South Asia has always foundered the historical absence of
mutual trust, confidence and cooperation between SAARC members India and Pakistan. The current thaw in Indo-Pakistan
relations shows that it remains imperative to identify potential areas of cooperation between these two countries so as to
reduce threats to the region as a whole. It is essential that India and Pakistan undertake confidence-building measures
(CBMs) capable of locking the parties into an irreversible relationship of peaceful co-existence. Although there have been
military CBMs between the two countries, their importance have been undermined as the beneficial effects of such measures
have not been readily visible. In this regard, India and Pakistan must search for non-military CBMs.
Non-military CBMs have often been used to reduce threat perception and build confidence between potential adversaries. This
is particularly true in the case of economic CBMs, whose visible effects help countries build confidence and establish mutual
trust. Although it cannot be concluded that the economic relationship plays a pivotal role in strengthening the foundation on
which the political relationship is built, it could be argued that economic factors have considerable leverage in influencing the
political relationship. Franco-German, Sino-US and Sino-Japan relations are evidence that extensive economic relation- ships
have a spill-over effect in positively influencing the political understanding and, subsequently, regional security between
countries.
Successful CBMs must be verifiable, and require that the agreeing parties have the political will to initiate and
maintain agreements.2 In this regard, there are two possible dimensions for non-military CBMs between India and Pakistan;
namely, free trade and energy trade. The experience of these two countries in establishing free trade is far from impressive.
Although the dynamics of international relations have changed, with trade and investment issues occupying an important role
in foreign policy issues, the primacy of economic issues in Indo-Pakistan relations has not been realised. Pakistan and India
have both resisted becoming economically dependent on the other and, unlike other contiguous countries, their economies are
insulated from each other.
Yet, contrary to trade in commodities or other items, the energy trade between India and Pakistan is capable of acting as a
CBM in their relations. The creation of irreversible economic interdependence through trade and investment would
enhance regional security in South Asia. Energy trade in this regard gains more significance, as it has all the potential to
lock India and Pakistan into an irreversible economic interdependence. Such an effort would help India and Pakistan to
intensify relations in other potential areas of cooperation.
163
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Shiv Kumar Verma, Political Geography Division, Center for International Politics, Organization and
Disarmament, School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. 06-07. “Energy
geopolitics and Iran–Pakistan–India gas pipeline,” Energy Policy, Volume 35, Issue 6, pp. 3280-3301.
However, the gas pipeline could bind the two countries in economic linkages that would be quite hard for either side to snap for
political reasons (Krepon and Haider, 2005). As regards Indo-Pak relations, the traditional pattern of hostility has not only
continued, but has also considerably escalated. The Indo-Pak rivalry has revolved around three long-standing issues: Kashmir,
communal tension, and the military. Many observers of this process are worried that overt nuclear rivalry will not produce a
stable deterrence configuration between India and Pakistan (Buzan, 2002). In sum, the grand vision of friendship through
economic integration is a gamble. But it is not a very dangerous gamble and may succeed. New Indo-Pak wars are
possible, but extremely unlikely. Three wars over Kashmir have proved that war achieves nothing. And nuclear bombs are
powerful deterrents (Kargil war may be seen as a mere border incident). Since war risk is small, it may be worth taking a
small risk on the pipeline for an optimistic but possible peace gain. But it is not an energy security. If Iran pipeline is
extended further to China it is beneficial to India from security point of view, because Pakistan cannot cut off supply to
India without cutting it off to China. Whether China wants such a long pipeline through so many country remains to be seen
(Aiyar, 2005a). But China shows little interest in this project because China feels that this project is full of challenges, such as
US opposition. In addition, to China and India are rivals not only in Iran's energy sector but also in global level. However, if
India is to emerge as the world's largest economy by the middle of this century as envisaged by Goldman Sachs, it has to solve
two interrelated challenge: stem its growing energy deficit, and contain active and emergent security threats. In fact, energy
needs are beginning to dictate military planning for its long-term energy strategy. For the first time, India has begun to integrate
its energy policy with foreign policy by consciously promoting oil diplomacy geared towards seizing energy-related
opportunities overseas. What is not happening is the blending if India's energy policy with defense policy. At best the two are
parallel policies with little convergence and perspective sharing between ministries.
164
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
The natural gas pipeline to Pakistan and India, “Peace Project” is being
seriously followed up. For this project the techno-economic study of an
1883-km pipeline to carry 45 mcm/day of Iranian gas to Pishin in
Pakistan via the Port of Asaluyeh in Iran has been completed. The
feasibility and commercial viability of this pipeline is no longer in
question.
At the same time, Iran is planning to develop its natural gas pipeline
network by extending it to its eastern and western borders to become a
major hub for natural gas transactions. Expansion of cross border
piped gas trade volume to a net of about 40 bcm/y by next 10 years is
one of the main strategic goals of Iran. The existing pipeline network
plus the ones under construction or study in Iran will eventually link
Central Asia, the Persian Gulf states, Azarbaijan, and Turkish gas
pipelines through Iran to everyones’ benefit. Further extension of this
loop to the East could supply Pakistan and India, and in the West a new
line from Turkey to Europe would complete the link between Asia and
Europe. Such a network will allow unprecedented major swaps with
remarkable advantages for seasonal adjustments.
165
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Impacts – CBMs
IPI pipeline is key confidence building measure
Gal Luft is Executive Director of the Institute for the Analysis of Global Security. Iran-Pakistan-India pipeline:
the Baloch wildcard, January 12th 2005, www.iags.org/n0115042.htm
A land based pipeline would be four times cheaper than any other option, even after taking into account transit fee payments to
Pakistan. But for a long time political tensions between India and Pakistan made it difficult for Delhi to accept an energy project that
would create dependence on a neighbor with whom its relations are far from stable. Recent improvement in the relations between the
two neighbors has bought India to finally consider joining forces with Pakistan for the mutually beneficial pipeline project, estimated
to cost around $4 billion. A third of the gas would be delivered to Pakistan and the rest to India.
For Iran, India’s participation in the project is of paramount importance. In addition to a broader market for its gas Iran hopes to gain
political support from India as it is facing strong international pressure to terminate its nuclear program. In return for India's agreement
to buy large quantities of gas, Iran has awarded Indian gas companies major service contracts and also granted them participation in
refining and other energy related projects to the tune of $40 billion. Iran’s relations with Pakistan are also strategically important. With
American troops stationed in neighboring Afghanistan and Iraq, Iran is trying to check U.S. influence in the region by strengthening
its ties with Pakistan, one of America’s most needed allies in the war on terror. The Pakistanis, for their part, would like to see their
territory used as a transit route to export natural gas to India. This would not only guarantee a source of income for them but also
increase stability in the region. Pakistani Prime Minister Shaukat Aziz said the Iran-Pakistan-India gas pipeline is "a win-win
proposition for Iran, India, and Pakistan," that could serve as a durable confidence-building measure, creating strong economic links
and business partnerships among the three countries.
166
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Dr. Anjali Sahay Visiting Assistant Professor,PhD( Old Dominion University) AND Dr. Jalil Roshandel Associate Professor,
PhD.(Universite des Science Sociales, Tolouse, France) March 28th 2008 Iran, Pakistan, India Natural Gas Pipeline: Implications and
Challenges for the United States
Since the discovery of natural gas reserves in Iran’s South Pars field in 1988, the
governments of Iran, Pakistan, and India have increased their efforts in realizing a natural gas
pipeline project that will serve the twin purpose of increasing Iran’s gas exports and meeting
high energy demands in South Asian countries. Billed as a ‘peace pipeline’ by the three
countries, the Iran-Pakistan-India (IPI) gas pipeline assumes special significance for both
economic and political reasons. Not only will energy-deficient countries like India and
Pakistan benefit greatly from importing natural gas from Iran, but also, a project of this scope
will strengthen the dyadic relations amongst them for greater regional stability. As the owner
of the world’s second largest proven natural gas reserves after Russia, Iran is keen to exploit
this resource as a source of revenue. India remains the biggest potential customer of this
pipeline project with an ever increasing population to meet its energy needs. Pakistan, that
refuses to establish normal trading ties with India will also benefit greatly by the pipeline by
earning hundreds of millions of dollars in transit fees and other annual royalties from both
Iran and India.
167
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Bruce Pannier, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. 04/28/08. “Energy: Turkmen, Iranian Presidents Moving
Ahead With Rival Pipelines,” Payvand. http://www.payvand.com/news/08/apr/1293.html
[Takumi Murayama]
Analysts point to two major drawbacks with TAPI. The first is the route through Afghanistan, where it will be difficult
to ensure security for the pipeline, especially as it turns eastwards and approaches Kandahar, where fighting between
militants and the Afghan government and foreign forces is still a daily occurrence. Turkmenistan and Pakistan have been
trying for more than a decade to get the pipeline built, but security problems in Afghanistan have always held up the deal. If
security could be guaranteed, Afghanistan stands to receive large and badly needed revenues from transit fees.
The second problem is the question of how much natural gas Turkmenistan actually has. The April 28 edition of the
Russian daily "Kommersant" points out that Turkmenistan has a contract with Russia's Gazprom to export up to 50 bcm of gas
annually to Russia for two more decades, a contract with China that starts in 2009 for 30 bcm annually, and a deal with Iran for
8 bcm annually. Berdymukhammedov also promised earlier this month to send 10 bcm to Europe Union countries, though the
details of that agreement are still unclear. The acceptance of the TAPI deal would bring annual Turkmen natural-gas
exports to well over 100 bcm annually -- a huge amount of natural gas to export when Turkmenistan's proven reserves of
gas are not fully known.
TAPI’s budget is underestimated and it’s still uncertain whether Turkmenistan even HAS gas
Meanwhile, the American-backed alternative languishes. The TAPI plan, to bring gas from Turkmenistan through
Afghanistan and Pakistan into India, would keep Iran out and diminish Russian influence in Central Asia.
But projected costs have doubled since 2002 to $7.6 billion, though energy experts remain skeptical of the new number
given that the pipeline would pass directly through war-torn Afghanistan. Former World Bank economist and energy expert
John Foster believes TAPI proponents are underestimating their budget in order to compete more aggressively with the
IPI plan. "There are some games going on with that number," he says.
There are doubts, too, about TAPI's output: The Asian Development Bank, financiers for the project, has yet to reveal data
regarding Turkmenistan's energy resources. As a result, says Deora, "TAPI is at a very primitive stage. We're not even
sure if there's gas there, or how much." India's growing economy, he says, cannot wait any longer for an energy lifeline.
India accounted for a third of the 3% rise in global energy consumption in 2007.
168
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
G. Parthasarathy, former High Commissioner to Pakistan. 05/15/08. “Iranian gas pipeline: Facts and fiction,”
The Hindu Business Line. http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2008/05/15/stories/2008051550180800.htm.
[Takumi Murayama]
Should India worry about US pressures over the IPI pipeline? In August 2006, the US Congress unanimously passed the
“Iran, Libya Sanctions Act” (ILSA), which provides for imposition of US sanctionson companies, irrespective of their
“corporate nationality” that invest more than $ 20 mm annually in the Iranian oil and gas sector. Despite this legislation, Iran
has attracted more than $ 30 bn of foreign investment in its energy sector since the sanctions were imposed. The European
Union has opposed the ILSA sanctions and passed a Resolution on November 22, 1996 directing its companies not to comply
with the sanctions.
A number of European Companies, including Total of France and Italy’s ENI, have ignored the sanctions, as have Petronas
from Malaysia and the Russian energy giant, Gazprom.
In these circumstances, there is no reason for India to hesitate to proceed with the IPI pipeline, merely because of
apprehensions of the adverse impact of possible American sanctions.
If Washington expresses displeasure, it can be politely told that, given our need for environmentally friendly sources of
energy we have no option but to seek access to natural gas to meet our energy needs.
Kaveh L Afrasiabi, PhD in political science, specializing in Iran’s foreign and nuclear affairs at the Center For
Strategic Research. 07/10/07. “A blockage in the peace pipeline,” Asia Times.
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/IG10Df01.html [Takumi Murayama]
Already some 1,100 kilometers of the 2,600km pipeline that pass through Iran's territory is about 50% built, and that
certainly is good news. More good news is that both Pakistan and India have successfully fought off US pressure to stop
the project that Washington deemed geopolitically beneficial to Iran.
Bruce Pannier, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. 04/28/08. “Energy: Turkmen, Iranian Presidents Moving
Ahead With Rival Pipelines,” Payvand. http://www.payvand.com/news/08/apr/1293.html
[Takumi Murayama]
IPI's disadvantage is the U.S. objection to the pipeline -- but both Pakistan and India have indicated publicly that their
countries' demand for energy is such that Islamabad and New Delhi are prepared to endure the possibility of
complicating ties with Washington. The ABD has not come out in favor of IPI, and many potential international investors
may be frightened of facing Washington's wrath for being part of IPI.
A distinct advantage for IPI is that there are two major companies that have expressed interest in joining the project --
Russia's Gazprom and the China National Petroleum Corporation. Gazprom has supported the IPI project for several years but
China's interest is relatively new and may have to do with a proposal from Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf earlier this
month that his country could build a "Karakorum" pipeline to deliver gas or oil to China through mountain passes in the
Himalayas. Such pipelines could bring not only Iranian natural gas but also gas and oil delivered to Pakistani port cities along
the Arabian Sea.
169
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
170
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
S. G. Pandian, School of Business, University of Hull. 09/05. “Energy trade as a confidence-building measure
between India and Pakistan: a study of the Indo-Iran trans-Pakistan pipeline project,” Contemporary South
Asia 14(3), p. 315. [Takumi Murayama]
Although the trans-Pakistan route for the Indo-Iran pipeline is capable of addressing India’s long-term energy demand, New
Delhi has been apprehensive about the security of the on-land option. Although Pakistan has assured the safety of the
pipeline in an undertaking to Iran, India is guarded in its understanding of Islamabad’s guarantees. Various measures have been
proposed to allay India’s fears. As a supplier, Iran has agreed to provide sovereign guarantee for the supply of gas. India,
wary of the physical security of the on-land pipeline, sought a guarantee from Iran that, if Pakistan stopped the gas supply in
case of an armed conflict, Iran will supply an equal amount of LNG to India at the same price. In return, Tehran has agreed
both to supply an equal amount of LNG to India at the same price in times of supply disruption, as well as to stop
delivery of gas to Pakistan if Islamabad disrupts gas supplies to India.40 Iran also proposed setting up an international
consortium of bankers and energy companies that would buy the gas from Iran and sell it to India.41 To ensure uninterrupted
energy supply, it also suggested a tripartite agreement between India, Iran and Pakistan with the inclusion of global financial
institutions such as the World Bank and Asian Development Bank as guarantors.42 Furthermore, it was suggested that
Islamabad’s expectations of substantial transit fees was a reasonable enough guarantee against sabotage by Pakistan.
171
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
172
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Shiv Kumar Verma, Political Geography Division, Center for International Politics, Organization and
Disarmament, School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. 06-07. “Energy
geopolitics and Iran–Pakistan–India gas pipeline,” Energy Policy, Volume 35, Issue 6, pp. 3280-3301. [Takumi
Murayama]
Iran's proven oil reserves at the end of 2003 were estimated to be 130,700 million barrels, representing 11.4% of world reserves
and some 18.0% of those in the Middle East. With proven reserves of 26,690,000 million cubic meters at the end of 2003, Iran
is the world's second richest country in natural gas resources after Russia, with some 15% of the global and 37% of the Middle
East region total, which is a major discover for Iran (Fisher, 2005). The South Pars offshore fields, which is an extension of
Qatar's North Field, are officially the largest natural gas reserves in the world. In the 21st century, the most important factors
that will decisively determine the fate of Iran gas pipeline are United States and China in the Persian Gulf. Both are the
largest consumers of oil and gas in the world. So a new Iran–Pakistan–India–China–Russia scenario begins to emerge, which
links global oil and gas security to geopolitics. The question is: can these two issues be reconciled? This paper will endeavor to
analyze the importance of Iran as a gas supplier to east, especially, India and China. It will argue that such dependence on a
volatile region like Iran and the perception of scarcer energy resources in the South Asian region have the potential to
lead to conflict in both regions unless these issues are dealt with geo-economics rather than geo-strategic calculations.
However, the recent understanding between the United States and India seems to cancel the whole pipeline project as
long as present Iranian regime remains in power. The broad geopolitical conditions that would favor or block the Iran–
Pakistan–India (IPI) pipeline project and Iran's situation as well as the role of the United States in Asia and the state of relations
between India and Pakistan are also pertinent issues that are going to be influential in fructifying the proposed pipeline. The
moot question relates to Pakistan's subsidizing the purchases of Iranian gas and how would it finance this commercial
juggernaut. Pakistan would not have an interest in the stable flow of gas in transit unless it is to finance some of its own
purchases from the fees. There is competition for gas from the Gulf, and from Iran. This is not only a matter of political and
military strategies, but as much as question of commercial and financial incentives. China seems to have understood that, as
exemplified with the deal with Iran. The question is, to what extent India would be able and willing to offer a competing deal.
So far, due to Indian foreign policy changes, Iran seems to have suspended the emerging deal with India. In the midst of such
dynamics it is to be seen as to what extent India prefers a close relationship with the United States at the expense of gas trade
with Iran.
173
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Ariel Cohen, Ph.D., Senior Research Fellow in Russian and Eurasian Studies and International Energy
Security in the Douglas and Sarah Allison Center for Foreign Policy Studies, Lisa Curtis, Senior Research
Fellow for South Asia in the Asian Studies Center, and Owen Graham, Research Assistant in the Allison
Center at The Heritage Foundation. 05/30/08. “The Proposed Iran-Pakistan-India Gas Pipeline: An
Unacceptable Risk to Regional Security,” Heritage. [Takumi Murayama]
Iran is an important economic power in the nat ural gas and petroleum industry, but numerous deficiencies in its oil and
gas sector have caused the overall economy to lag far behind its potential and call into question Iran's future as an oil and gas
exporter, including its ability to supply gas to Paki stan and India through the IPI pipeline.
Iran has the second-largest gas reserves in the world after Russia and the second-largest petro leum reserves after Saudi Arabia.
Iran has an esti mated 974 trillion cubic feet in proven gas reserves and 136 billion barrels in proven oil reserves.[35] Oil
provides more than 70 percent of Iranian govern ment revenue.
Yet instead of reinvesting this money in the oil and gas sector, the Iranian government has generally spent it on
ambitious weapons purchases, its nuclear pro gram, support for terrorism, and economic subsidies. The Iranian regime is
investing only about half of the funds necessary just to maintain hydrocarbon pro duction, much less to expand production.
Iranian exports are declining by 10 percent to 12 percent annually according to a National Acad emy of Sciences (NAS) study.
If current trends con tinue, Iran's oil exports will drop by half in less than five years and disappear entirely by 2015. This
projected decline in production would be the result of a lack of investment in the oil sector and a short age of natural gas for
reinjection (to enhance oil recovery), caused by continuing massive growth in domestic demand for natural gas due to
subsidized consumption.[36]
Iran's domestic demand for natural gas is grow ing by nearly 9 percent annually, while its produc tion is growing by 4.5
percent per year.[37] Thus, domestic gas demand has increased at the expense of reinjection, accelerating oil depletion
rates. Despite its massive gas reserves, Iran has been forced to import 23 mcm per day from Turkmeni stan. However, on
December 31, 2007, Turkmeni stan stopped daily deliveries of gas, forcing Iran to begin importing from Azerbaijan.[38]
These trends indicate that Iran will be an unreli able oil and gas supplier and a high political risk. The NAS study
concludes that without major changes, Iran will cease to be a net oil exporter by 2014 and will therefore be incapable of
supplying gas to Pakistan and India through the IPI.[39]
174
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Ariel Cohen, Ph.D., Senior Research Fellow in Russian and Eurasian Studies and International Energy
Security in the Douglas and Sarah Allison Center for Foreign Policy Studies, Lisa Curtis, Senior Research
Fellow for South Asia in the Asian Studies Center, and Owen Graham, Research Assistant in the Allison
Center at The Heritage Foundation. 05/30/08. “The Proposed Iran-Pakistan-India Gas Pipeline: An
Unacceptable Risk to Regional Security,” Heritage. [Takumi Murayama]
Indian support for the IPI undercuts U.S. efforts to isolate Iran economically by challenging U.S. sanctions against Iran's oil
and gas industry. Over the long term, pursuing the IPI will increase Iranian influence in South Asia, which could
contribute to greater instability in the region, especially if Iran develops a nuclear weapons capability and contin ues to
support international terrorism.
Iran continues to flout international pressure to cease its uranium-enrichment efforts and discon tinue its nuclear program. In
March 2008, the U.N. Security Council took notice and passed Resolution 1803, the third round of sanctions on Iran, adding to
the sanctions adopted in 2006 and 2007.[30]
Resolution 1803 follows the December 2007 release of the controversial National Intelligence Estimate, which stated that Iran
had halted its nuclear weapons program in 2003. While this may be the case, the report also recognizes that Iranian entities
are continuing to develop a range of techni cal capabilities that could be applied to producing nuclear weapons and that
Iran's uranium enrich ment and ballistic missile programs are continu ing.[31] Both programs are vital for building a
nuclear weapons arsenal. Moreover, Iran remains the world's biggest supporter and financer of terrorism.
4. IPI Pipeline Bad: Terrorism, Iran Nukes, and killing US soft power
Dr. Anjali Sahay Visiting Assistant Professor,PhD( Old Dominion University) AND Dr. Jalil Roshandel Associate Professor,
PhD.(Universite des Science Sociales, Tolouse, France) March 28th 2008 Iran, Pakistan, India Natural Gas Pipeline: Implications and
Challenges for the United States
In addition, emerging strategic relations
between Iran and India could lead to cooperation in the nuclear field. Furthermore, revenues
generated by Pakistan could be further used to support terrorist activities, depending on who
channels the funding. While the US recognizes the growing energy needs of India and
Pakistan, it has repeatedly expressed concerns over international participation in energy
projects with Iran. Moreover, the revenues acquired could be used to further Iran’s alleged
nuclear weapons program, support for terrorism in addition to a concern on Iran’s human
rights record. It is not clear who will be finally involved in the implementation of the project,
but China, Russia, Japan, and some Europeans could potentially fit in the long term. Last but
not least, Russian involvement in the building of the pipeline project in addition to their
involvement in the Caspian Sea projects can further complicate the situation by reducing US
involvement in the region.
175
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Bruce Pannier, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. 04/28/08. “Energy: Turkmen, Iranian Presidents Moving
Ahead With Rival Pipelines,” Payvand. http://www.payvand.com/news/08/apr/1293.html
[Takumi Murayama]
Reports from Islamabad on April 25 indicated that India and Pakistan were close to finalizing their part of the deal.
Ahmadinejad is trying to push the potential partners to sign that deal. For its part, Iran has already started constructing the
pipeline on its territory and could have its section to the Pakistani border completed by 2012.
The IPI pipeline would be some 2,600 kilometers long and would cost an estimated $7 billion. The IPI pipeline would initially
carry some 30 bcm annually, but within three to four years after starting up that amount would increase to 70 bcm. Iran first
proposed the pipeline in the 1990s, but tensions between Pakistan and India kept the project on hold until now. In their
meetings last week, Pakistani and Indian officials stressed that cooperation between the two nuclear neighbors is better
now.
176
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
AFF – No Pipeline
US will intervene to stop the pipeline
Dr. Ali Mostashari, Strategic Initiatives Advisor, UN Development; and Research Affiliate, MIT. 01~03/07.
“The Political Economy of the Iran-Pakistan-India Gas Pipeline,” Iran Analysis Quarterly Vol. 4 Number 1, p.
31. [Takumi Murayama]
While differences on the pricing structure between India and Pakistan are the current official stumbling block (Times of India,
March 22, 2007), the U.S. opposition to the IPI project and the potentials of being impacted by U.S. sanctions is also
influencing India’s current reluctance to go ahead with the project. Not surprisingly, India faces pressures from the United
States to isolate Iran and to rely on an alternative route, the Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan (TAP) gas pipeline project, if it
wanted to keep its good relations with the U.S (Jamali, 2005). The Financial Times reported in January 2006 that Washington
had “warned India that Delhi’s own nuclear deal with the US could be ditched if the Indian government did not vote to refer
Tehran to the United Nations Security Council ( Financial Times, January 26, 2006). The impact of U.S. pressure was seen in
another decision-making venue involving Iran, when India endorsed the referral of Iran to the Security Council during the
February meeting of the IAEA. This resulted in Iran’s refusal to ratify the previously agreed liquefied natural gas (LNG) deal
with India for the time being. More recently, there was a perceived shift in the U.S. rhetoric on the issue when President Bush
indicated that the administration may soften its stance on the issue during a visit to Pakistan in March 2006, when he said "our
beef with Iran is not the pipeline, our beef with Iran is the fact that they want to develop a nuclear weapon."(India Daily, March
4, 2006). However, the administration openly supports the TAP project and could use economic, strategic and nuclear
incentives to Delhi for forsaking the IPI project if it feels that an agreement is near.
177
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Shiv Kumar Verma, Political Geography Division, Center for International Politics, Organization and
Disarmament, School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. 06-07. “Energy
geopolitics and Iran–Pakistan–India gas pipeline,” Energy Policy, Volume 35, Issue 6, pp. 3280-3301.
[Takumi Murayama]
Therefore, nuclear power looks like becoming critical to India's economy and long-term energy security. First, India's rise
as an economic power means that its energy needs will rise massively. The BRIC report of Goldman Sachs projects India's
GDP to rise by 40 times between 2000 and 2050. If energy consumption rises at just half this rate, it means India will need 20
times more energy in 2050. It will be difficult or impossible to meet these needs through conventional fuels. Secondly, the
price of fossil fuels has shot up, with oil more than doubling to US$80/barrel and gas more than tripling to US$7/mBtu in
the US. Oil prices are notoriously volatile and could fall sharply in a few years. But they will surely rise again later. The
emergence of China, India, and other Asian countries as major consumers means that global supplies of fossil fuels will
increasingly come under pressure. By contrast, nuclear energy is unconstrained by fuel worries: a small amount of uranium
generates many megawatts, and plutonium can be extracted from the spent fuel to yield fresh fuel in mixed-oxide reactors.
Nuclear power plants are extremely capital intensive, costing twice as much as thermal plants of comparable output. They
need an additional 10–15% for de-commissioning when they become too old to operate. But they have the big advantage of
very low running costs. By contrast, running costs can be half the total costs in a thermal plant, and keep rising with fuel
prices.
178
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Bill Holland, associate editor for Platts Gas Daily. 11/07/07. “Economics govern future of IPI gas pipeline;
Analysts see India's coal resources as more obvious gas source,” p. 2. [Takumi Murayama]
"The politics are going to be too much for India," said Mark Rowley, oil and gas attorney at the London office of law firm
Baker Botts. Rowley is a veteran of cross-border pipeline projects, having been involved with both the Caspian and the Baku-
Tbilisi-Ceyhan oil pipelines.
"Pipeline gas is an option [for India] but not the most obvious one," Rowley said. "India has vast coal resources–that's
much more obvious than putting a pipe through Pakistan."
Rowley said there was a high likelihood that the Iran-Pakistan portion of the pipeline would be built, but doubted that India
would ever rely on its historic enemy Pakistan to meet its energy needs.
"Coal is king," Frost & Sullivan Asian Pacific Energy Practice Director Ravi Krishnaswamy told executives at the Asian
Business Forum's Asian Power Conference in Singapore last month. India's coal-fired power generation will increase
significantly, particularly if government plans to find developers for 10 ultra-mega power projects between 2012 and 2017
come to fruition. Each UMPP would generate 4,000 MW or more, Krishnaswamy said.
India needs gas mainly as feedstock for its petrochemical and fertilizer industries. Gas-fired power plants account for only
8% of the country's 15.4 quadrillion Btus of annual energy consumption, according to the US Energy Information
Administration.
179
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Bill Holland, associate editor for Platts Gas Daily. 11/07/07. “Economics govern future of IPI gas pipeline;
Analysts see India's coal resources as more obvious gas source,” p. 2. [Takumi Murayama]
India currently produces 996 Bcf/year of gas and consumes 1.1 Tcf/year, importing the difference as LNG through two
terminals. But its demand for natural gas has risen faster than that for any other fuel over the last five years, the EIA
said.
Energy security analyst Gal Luft of the Institute for the Analysis of Global Security, a think-tank based in Washington, DC,
believes the pipeline will have to be built. "India doesn't have much of a choice, Iran is the only game in town" for
satisfying the subcontinent's growing energy needs, Luft said. "At the end of the day, they need the gas and it will come
from Iran."
180
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Gurmeet Kanwal, Director, Centre for Land Warfare Studies, New Delhi. 07/06/08. “IPI pipeline a good option
- but a security nightmare,” IANS, http://feeds.bignewsnetwork.com/index.php?sid=378963
[Takumi Murayama]
Though this option through Pakistan is economically the most viable, India must consider whether good economics
should be allowed to be jeopardised by bad security. India must not allow the supply of a strategic resource to be held
hostage to the machinations of capricious jihadi elements. Also, the Baloch people are concerned that Pakistan will not
equitably share with their underdeveloped province the revenues earned from the pipeline. A new wave of vigorous insurgency
has engulfed most of Balochistan and the gas pipeline is bound to be targeted.
Though the government of Pakistan has stated several times that Pakistan is willing to give a unilateral undertaking that it will
not allow the disruption of the supply of gas to India, President Pervez Musharraf had admitted that his government had no
control over some jihadi organisations that are responsible for internal instability in Pakistan. Since then, internal instability has
deteriorated further. How then will the Pakistan government ensure the physical security of a pipeline that runs for almost
1,500 km through open terrain even if it is inclined to do so?
The diameter of the gas pipeline would be 50 to 55 inches. Though such pipelines are mostly buried underground, they are laid
just below the surface and their route is well marked to facilitate maintenance, making them prone to easy disruption. The
compressor stations that are usually overground are also vulnerable to sabotage, though these are easier to guard.
Any terrorist group or disgruntled individual fanatic with a medieval mindset could disrupt the pipeline with a few grams
of plastic explosive or a few hundred grams of high explosives that are available in abundance in Pakistan. In fact, explosive
charges, detonators and cordite are so freely available in some areas in Pakistan that one can buy the stuff from the
neighbourhood grocer. Under such circumstances, ensuring the security of the pipeline would be a challenge for the most
committed police or paramilitary force.
The entire length of the pipeline would need to be fenced off on both sides to deny easy access to prospective saboteurs. Since
wire fencing can be easily cut, it would need to be kept under electro-optical surveillance throughout its length, combined with
continuous physical patrolling. All these measures would cost a massive amount to implement and would still not guarantee
100 percent security.
A more suitable option may be to form an international consortium of stakeholders to build and operate the pipeline, buy the
gas from Iran and deliver it at India's border. Such a consortium will incur heavy costs to ensure the security of the pipeline.
Also, higher insurance costs, other opportunity costs and the need to maintain larger strategic reserves might well make the
overland option too expensive.
Perhaps the best option at present is to continue with LNG while simultaneously exploring the possibility of a secure
overland route with unimpeachable international guarantees. If India can get natural gas at the border and has to pay only
for what it gets - cash-on-delivery - without sinking its money into capital investment, the Iran-Pakistan-India pipeline might
still be a good option. Decisions made today will affect India's energy security and have an impact on the growing
economy for decades to come and must, therefore, not be made lightly.
181
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
FARS News Agency. 06/28/08. “Pakistan Steps up Pressure over IPI Pipeline.”
http://english.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn=8704080876 [Takumi Murayama]
Even though petroleum minister Murli Deora reiterated India's commitment to the pipeline project, the government is
concerned over the issue of assured supply of gas and security of the pipeline. New Delhi wants both issues to be
negotiated at the trilateral level. Sources said these issues have still not been taken up for discussion till now.
Mukherjee, who had earlier discussed the pipeline project during his trip to Islamabad, merely hoped that the outstanding
issues would be sorted out.
"We are hopeful it will be possible to resolve this technical, commercial and all other aspect so that it can contribute to
the problems arising from high energy crisis," he said.
182
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Kaveh L Afrasiabi, PhD in political science, specializing in Iran’s foreign and nuclear affairs at the Center For
Strategic Research. 07/10/07. “A blockage in the peace pipeline,” Asia Times.
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/IG10Df01.html [Takumi Murayama]
But broadly speaking, the "external obstacles" to this project pale in comparison with the tangible benefits to all three
countries, such as securing a reliable gas supply for energy-strapped India, bringing much-needed cash to the Pakistani
government, and helping Iran with its "energy strategy".
Concerning the latter, it is noteworthy that Iran has some 15.7% of the world's natural-gas reserves, second only to Russia,
although its current share in the global gas market is negligible. That's partly as a result of the lack of adequate (badly
needed) investment in the gas sector and partly due to existing external obstacles such as the US sanctions.
Iran's planned export of natural gas to India is part of a broader, long-term energy strategy that relies both on pipelines
and the more technologically challenging liquefied natural gas (LNG) exported to China, Turkey and Europe. India has
already signed a separate $22 billion LNG deal with Iran.
Iran plans to increase its gas exports through pipelines to 303.6 million cubic meters per day (mcm/d) by 2025 from some
13mcm/d in 2006. Iran's LNG exports are also expected to grow to 18mcm/d by 2025. Therefore, Iran's total natural gas export
will reach around 18 billion cubic meters (bcm) in 2025, assuming that the pipeline does not turn into a pipe dream at the end
of the day.
Dr. Ali Mostashari, Strategic Initiatives Advisor, UN Development; and Research Affiliate, MIT. 01~03/07.
“The Political Economy of the Iran-Pakistan-India Gas Pipeline,” Iran Analysis Quarterly Vol. 4 Number 1, p.
27. [Takumi Murayama]
The increasing energy needs of China and India at the beginning of the new century and continuous supply disruptions in
Iraq and elsewhere have led to an increasing importance of energy as a geopolitical weapon of choice. Many of today’s
energy resources lie within the control of governments which the United States does not see as allies. Russia, Iran, and
Venezuela and Bolivia, while having different relationships to the U.S. and exercising different strengths in the energy market,
can affect an already tight energy market the U.S. is quite dependent on. Specifically with regards to Iran, there have
been numerous implicit and not-so implicit threats by Tehran that U.S. and Western military or economic measures will
be countered by disruptions of the energy supply (Calgary herald, June 5, 2006). Not surprisingly, with increased tension
between Iran and the West markets have reacted with even higher energy prices, pushing prices to heights unseen since the
late 1970s and that despite the current existence of adequate energy stocks and supplies in the West.
183
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Ariel Cohen, Ph.D., Senior Research Fellow in Russian and Eurasian Studies and International Energy
Security in the Douglas and Sarah Allison Center for Foreign Policy Studies, Lisa Curtis, Senior Research
Fellow for South Asia in the Asian Studies Center, and Owen Graham, Research Assistant in the Allison
Center at The Heritage Foundation. 05/30/08. “The Proposed Iran-Pakistan-India Gas Pipeline: An
Unacceptable Risk to Regional Security,” Heritage. [Takumi Murayama]
This pipeline would give Iran an economic life line and increase its leverage and influence in South Asia. U.S.
policymakers argue that allowing the IPI pipeline to proceed would encourage the Iranian regime to defy the will of the
international community, develop nuclear weapons, and support terrorism. Furthermore, inadequate investment in Iran's
oil and gas industry and increasing domestic demand could render Iran incapable of supplying natural gas through the IPI.
Shiv Kumar Verma, Political Geography Division, Center for International Politics, Organization and
Disarmament, School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. 06-07. “Energy
geopolitics and Iran–Pakistan–India gas pipeline,” Energy Policy, Volume 35, Issue 6, pp. 3280-3301.
However, the US opposes the gas-pipeline deal; first, in its perception it would help ease Iran's economic difficulties
because of the handsome revenues it would generate. As it is, the US is concerned about the bonanza that oil-rich countries
including Iran are reaping due to skyrocketing global oil prices. Secondly, the pipeline would set a dangerous precedent for
other countries to follow. Iran is suitably placed as the natural transit corridor for the transport of Caspian Sea oil and gas. The
US has, therefore, gone overboard to draw transit routes for Caspian oil that bypass Iranian territory. The prime example of this
approach has been the construction of the Baku-Ceyhan oil pipeline. In this case, the US made an extraordinary effort to route
the pipeline towards the Turkish port of Ceyhan, so that Iranian territory was avoided. In this politically driven deal, the
companies involved had to spend millions in extra costs to construct the pipeline through unfriendly terrain and conflict proven
zones. Thirdly, and most important, the pipeline would help anchor friendly ties among Iran, Pakistan, and India. This
would greatly undermine US strategic leverage with India and Pakistan against Iran in the future. Therefore,
determined to keep Iran as isolated as possible, the US even prior to Mr. Ahmadinejad's emergence had tried to persuade
the Europeans and Iran's Arab neighbors to restrict economic and political links with it. The Europeans have largely
disregarded Americans exhortations, and Iran's relationship with them has grown over the years. European companies have
pumped in billions of dollars in Iran–Libya Sanctions Act adopted by the US, which bars investments of more than US$40
million into Iran's hydrocarbon sector. Defying US pressure, Japan, Washington's trusted ally, has also decided to put US$2
billion into developing Iran's giant Azadegan oil field, which has estimated deposits of 26 billion barrels. In October 2002, Iran
urged Caspian oil producers to ignore US sanctions and to pipe their oil through Iran. The Golden Gate from the Caspian Sea to
the Persian Gulf is now open and companies in the Caspian Sea can be sure their resources will be delivered in international
markets (Bhadrakumar, 2005).
184
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Shiv Kumar Verma, Political Geography Division, Center for International Politics, Organization and
Disarmament, School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. 06-07. “Energy
geopolitics and Iran–Pakistan–India gas pipeline,” Energy Policy, Volume 35, Issue 6, pp. 3280-3301.
Sanctions against Iran have thus far discouraged US oil corporations from accepting the Iranian pipeline offer. The
Persian route would be, as even US oil executives concede privately, shorter, cheaper, and safer than any of the other planned
pipelines through Russia, the south Caucasus, or Afghanistan. And while European companies active in Iran also face heavy
fines in the United States, very few of them feel similarly bound by the US sanctions. The French Prime Minister said that no
one accepts that the United States can now impose their laws on the rest of the world. European companies have taken
advantage of the absence of US competition on the Iranian oil market. In its efforts to keep the US out of the Caspian
region, Iran has found an unexpected ally in Russia. United States activities in this region have led both countries to
temporarily set aside their centuries old enmity. Now that they no longer share a common border after the fall of the Soviet
Union, their relations have grown almost cordial. Despite sharp criticism from the US, Moscow encourages Russian
companies to sell arms to Iran, and to assist the country in building its first civilian nuclear power plant at Bushehr. The
US$800 million project, to be completed by 2004, has been a major concern for US officials and non-proliferation experts
who fear that Iran could covert nuclear waste from the plant into weapons grade radioactive material, thereby
accelerating its efforts to develop its own nuclear weapons. The Russian assistance to Iran has now become the biggest
stumbling block in the current US–Russian rapprochement (Kleveman, 2003 L. Kleveman, Persian trump card: Iran, The
New Great Game: Blood and Oil in Central Asia, Atlantic Books, London (2003).Kleveman, 2003).
185
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Bruce Pannier, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. 04/28/08. “Energy: Turkmen, Iranian Presidents Moving
Ahead With Rival Pipelines,” Payvand. http://www.payvand.com/news/08/apr/1293.html
[Takumi Murayama]
But TAPI enjoys two advantages that the IPI does not -- support from the Asian Development Bank (ADB) and no
Iranian participation. The ADB's support gives the project a greater international profile and, since Iran is not involved,
TAPI may also find other investors -- including U.S. companies that are forbidden by U.S. law to deal with Iran, and
European investors who fear U.S. sanctions if they commit to IPI instead of TAPI.
186
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
RUSSIA
187
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
SHELL – RUSSIA
A. The world’s dependence on Russia is increasing – especially the U.S.
Marshall I. Goldman, Kathryn Wasserman Davis Professor of Russian Economics (Emeritus) at Wellesley
College, former associate Director of the Davis Center for Russian Studies at Harvard University from 1975 to
2006, M.A. and Ph.D. degrees in Russian studies and economics from Harvard University, honorary Doctor of
Laws degree from the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Fulbright-Hayes Lecturer at Moscow State
University, State Department consultant, May 27, 2008, Petrostate: Putin, Power, and the New Russia, Oxford
University Press, Pg. 3-7
But it is not only Europe that finds itself each day becoming more and more dependent on energy exports from Russia. Although
the United States is separated from Russia by oceans, it also is beginning to import and consume more and more Russian energy. As in
Europe, the United States is trying to reduce its overreliance on energy imports from the Middle East. As part of this diversification, in
2005 the United States imported dose to $8 billion worth of Russian petroleum. In woO, that jumped by 25 percent to $1o billion.
True, that represented only 3 percent of our petroleum imports small, but an increase from the 2.2 percent of 2004 and a hint that we
are likely to increase imports in the future.' More than that, in woo, LUKoi1, one of Russia largest private oil companies, purchased
nearly 3,000 filling stations in the United States from Getty Oil and Mobil and is now busily converting them into LUKoil outlets. It
also should be noted that in woO, Russia became the world's largest producer of petroleum, producing more than Saudi Arabia. This is
not the first time Russia has produced more petroleum than anyone else. It also reigned as the world's largest producer in the late
1970s and 198os. Even this was not unprecedented. As Table Intro. r indicates, Czarist Russia from 1898 to 1901 also produced more
oil than the United States, until then the leader.
188
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
SHELL – RUSSIA
C. Cooperation on LNG is key to U.S.-Russia relations
George W. Bush, the president of the United States, February 24, 2005, “President and President Putin Discuss Strong U.S.-
Russian Partnership”, http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/02/20050224-9.html, [T-Jacob]
Another important and interesting opportunity is our cooperation in the supplies of liquified natural gas. In the year
2010, 2011, a large amount of liquified natural gas can be supplied from Russia to the United States. Our investment
corporation is becoming generally bilateral. The first steps -- but constant steps are being made by Russian companies
that are starting to invest their capital into American economy. We have also discussed the status and prospects of Russia's
cooperation in science, high-tech; in particular, in the exploration of outer space. In conclusion, I would like to say that I
highly appreciate
the outcome of this summit. Later this year, we are going to meet a few more times within the framework of various
international fora. I would like to take this opportunity to thank the President of the United States who has accepted the
invitation to participate in the festivities on the occasion of the anniversary of the great victory on May 9th in Moscow. This is
a natural manifestation of respect of historic memory and the memory of the alliance that bonded our two countries in the years
of the second world war.
189
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
But the president ís contention that America’s economy is “petroleum-based” is not entirely accurate. Although oil makes up
approximately 40 percent of total U.S. energy consumption, coal and natural gas each now supply about 25 percent of the total
energy consumed by the United States. So, while oil is a major element in America’s energy supplies, it is by no means the
only significant factor. Disruption in natural gas or coal supplies would pose major problems to the American economy.
Moreover, there are increasing signs that when it comes to natural gas we are headed down a road similar to one we now face
with oil--and with security implications that echo oil ís as well. In short, like addicts the world over who try to free themselves
from one addiction only to find themselves hooked on another, so too Americans may soon find imported oil is not the only
energy-source problem about which we have to worry.
Until recently, the United States was in pretty good shape when it came to natural gas. Prices were low and supplies sufficient.
In 2000, for example, North America consumed nearly one-third of the world ís annual output of natural gas. Unlike oil, for
which the United States, Canada, and Mexico together produced only 60 percent of the supplies they consumed, the three
countries produced nearly 100 percent of the natural gas consumed. Bound together by free trade agreements, the continental
market for natural gas more than doubled through the 1990s.
If energy experts inside and outside the government are correct, the proportion of total energy consumption accounted for by
natural gas is likely to grow substantially over the next decade and a half. If current trend lines and government policies are
sustained, about 90 percent of the projected increase in electricity generation will be fueled by natural gas plants. Indeed,
between 2000 and 2004, America’s electricity-generating capacity grew by approximately one-fifth, and virtually all of that
growth was gas-fired. By 2020, predictions are that more than one-third of the country’s electricity will be generated through
burning natural gas. The reasons are well understood: power plants that burn natural gas cost less and are far easier to build
than nuclear power plants and have fewer waste and emission problems than nuclear or coal plants, respectively. With the
expanding use of natural gas for residences and its use as the primary feedstock in the manufacturing process for a wide variety
of products, demand for natural gas is expected to rise anywhere from 40 percent to 50 percent between 2000 and 2020.
The problem is that the available supply of natural gas is not keeping pace with this growing demand. In North America,
production from existing wells is declining, and new wells show a more rapid rate of decline than in the past. As the natural gas
producers themselves have remarked, they have to run harder to stay even--which means digging more but less productive
wells.
190
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Much of the world’s growing demand for natural gas is projected to be met by increased production from non-OECD nations.
In the IEO2008 reference case, non-OECD countries account for more than 90 percent of the world’s total growth in
production from 2005 to 2030 (Figure 5). A significant portion of the non-OECD production (excluding Russia and the other
nations of Eurasia) is expected to be in the form of export projects— particularly liquefied natural gas (LNG) projects. The
Middle East and Africa are at the forefront of the trend toward LNG: natural gas production in the two regions combined
increases by 21.0 trillion cubic feet between 2005 and 2030, but their combined demand for natural gas increases by only 9.9
trillion cubic feet. Significant increases in natural gas production are also projected for the countries of non-OECD Asia, but
those supply increases are expected to be used largely for consumption within the region rather than for export.
191
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Uniqueness – Gazprom
Because of high gas prices, Russia is looking to export to the U.S.
International Herald Tribune, June 18, 2008, “Russia's Gazprom sees 2008 gas export price outside ex-
Soviet Union at US$401”, http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2008/06/18/business/EU-FIN-COM-Russia-
Gazprom.php, Accessed July 15, 2008 CM
MOSCOW: Gazprom's revenues from natural gas exports should increase sharply this year on the strength of rising prices, a senior
official at the state-run Russian monopoly said Wednesday.
OAO Gazprom earned a record US$39.5 billion (€25.5 billion) from last year's sales outside the former Soviet Union and expects this
year to bring in US$64 billion (€41 billion), said Alexander Medvedev, deputy board chairman and head of Gazprom's export arm.
Gazprom — the world's largest exporter of natural gas — last year accounted for about a quarter of global exports including shipments
to the former Soviet republics, and 40 percent of imports to Western and Central Europe, the company said in a statement.
Natural gas export prices are increasing with rising demand, particularly in developing countries, the United States and Japan, as well
as rising costs of alternative heat sources, it said.
192
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Uniqueness – Gazprom
Gazprom is using western companies with expertise in LNG to export to the U.S.
Guy Chazan,staff writer Wall Street Journal, July 14, 2008, “Oil Sees End of Sweet Deals”,
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121599585371849677.html?mod=googlenews_wsj, Accessed July 15, 2008
CM
LONDON -- The terms of a Russian contract to develop one of the world's largest untapped natural-gas fields reveal the lengths to
which Western oil companies will go these days to gain a foothold in the dwindling pool of new hydrocarbon resources.
In Russia's sector of the Barents Sea, the Shtokman field is hundreds of miles offshore in Arctic, iceberg-strewn waters. But despite
the immense technical and investment challenges it poses, its 3.8 trillion cubic meters of gas has proven a huge draw for oil companies
desperate for new reserves.
Last year, Russia's natural-gas giant OAO Gazprom finally chose two Western energy firms -- Total SA of France and Norway's
StatoilHydro ASA -- to help it develop Shtokman, after years of negotiations. But the terms are unusual for the oil industry, and
unfavorable for Gazprom's partners. The consortium developing the field -- early estimates of costs top $20 billion -- won't own the
gas in the ground and will have to sell all that is produced to Gazprom.
"In most cases ... the starting point is that we want to market the gas ourselves," Helge Lund, chief executive of StatoilHydro, said in
an interview. With Shtokman, "the companies involved are basically taking a risk on future gas prices."
Some analysts wonder what exactly Total and StatoilHydro will get out of their involvement in Shtokman if they can't own and freely
sell its gas.
The situation reflects the bind major oil companies find themselves in. Much of the world's hydrocarbon resources are in places like
the Middle East that are largely off-limits to foreign investors. In countries that haven't completely slammed the door, reserves are
often in the hands of state-run companies like Gazprom that are becoming more assertive in their dealings with foreigners.
In the past, Western companies owned the oil and gas in the ground, merely paying taxes and royalties to the host countries. But those
arrangements are becoming outmoded. Some in the industry think the future lies in the kind of technical-service contracts in which
oil-field-service companies like Halliburton Co. and Schlumberger Ltd. specialize. Under such deals, major oil companies would be
unable to book energy reserves, even though reserve growth is still one of the key metrics analysts and shareholders use to evaluate an
oil company's performance.
Some companies have strongly resisted the move to service contracts. But a few acknowledge the need for a rethink. Tony Hayward,
chief executive of BP PLC, told a conference in Madrid recently that the oil industry needed to "move beyond the historical model that
requires ownership of reserves and production." He called for a new era of "reciprocity," where the majors form partnerships with
national oil companies and help them expand internationally.
Shtokman reflects that new reality. Total said it will be able to book the field's reserves -- but it won't own them. Gazprom insisted on
retaining sole ownership of the Shtokman license and will also take a 51% stake in Shtokman Development Co., which will finance
and build the infrastructure at the field. Total has 25% and StatoilHydro 24%.
The contract only relates to a third of the Shtokman license area, though initial talks suggested it would cover the whole field.
Negotiations on Shtokman began in earnest in 2006, after five companies were shortlisted: Total, Statoil, Norsk Hydro (which later
merged to become StatoilHydro), ConocoPhillips and Chevron Corp. BP and Royal Dutch Shell PLC had taken a look at the project
but decided it wasn't worth it. Then in October of that year, Gazprom said foreign companies could still take part, but only as
contractors. Chevron said the terms were unacceptable and dropped out.
A year later, after inconclusive talks with contractors, it changed its mind again. Gazprom wanted to produce liquefied natural gas at
Shtokman and export it to the U.S., and to do that it needed the help of a company like Total, a world leader in LNG. Also,
StatoilHydro was one of the few companies experienced at operating in the Arctic. But this time, the terms being offered to Western
oil majors were much tougher.
193
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Putin's concern for Russia's struggling economic and lost superpower status long predates his appointment as prime minister. In
a dissertation submitted in June 1997 to the St. Petersburg Mining Institute and in a subsequent article "Mineral'no syr'evye
resursy v strategi razvitiia Rossiiskoi ekonomiki," published in Zapiski Gornogo Instituta in 1999 and translated by Harley
Balzer in Problems of Post Communism in January 2006, Putin outlined a plan, a sort of "owner's manual" for Russia's
recovery and return to economic and political influence. The thesis itself was probably written just before and after his boss
Anatoly Sobchak, L governor of St. Petersburg, lost his reelection in 1996. Since Putin worked for Sobchak, this loss meant
that Putin was also without a job.
In his dissertation Putin called on the Russian government to reassert its control over the country's abundant natural
resources and raw materials. "The process of restructuring the national economy must have the goal of creating the most
effective and competitive companies on both the domestic and world markets." He viewed this as probably the best way to
reestablish Russia's status as a superpower, an energy superpower. Instead of allowing the country's oligarch controlled
corporations to focus exclusively on making a profit, Putin proposed that they should be used instead to advance the
country's national interests.
To reclaim some of the assets spun off to private interests under Yeltsin, Russia should commandeer these companies and
once again integrate them vertically into industrial conglomerates so they could compete better with Western multinational
corporations such as Exxon Mobil and Shell. In Putin's words, "Regardless of who is the legal owner of the country's natural
resources and in particular the mineral resources, the state has the right to regulate the process of their development and use.
The state should act in the interests of society as a whole and of individual property owners, when their interests come into
conflict with each other and when they need the help of state organs of power to reach compromises when their interests
conflict."'
194
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
True, Russia may no longer be a military world superpower, but there is little doubt that despite President Putin insistence
that it is not one, Russia today is again a superpower. Only now it is an energy superpower.
Nor are Putin and those around him leaving this to chance. At first glance it may seem that much of this is just a matter of
luck. But as we shall see, a more careful examination shows that this use of the natural resources and the way they are
exploited by what Putin has come to call "national champions" is all part of a carefully thought out grand strategy. Part of that
strategy calls for the reimposition not only of state control but of state ownership (renationalization) of at least 50 percent plus
one share of the stock of many of the petroleum, metal, and manufacturing companies that were privatized in the mid ' 99os.
Led by Rosneft where the state has always held majority ownership, companies like Yukos and Sibneft have been effectively
renationalized. (I low far-reaching this has been we will see in greater detail in Chapter 5, Table
.4.) That explains why the share of crude oil production produced by the state dominated companies in the year 2000, the
year Putin took over as president, had fallen to as low as 10 percent. However, by 2007, just before he gave up the presidency,
state dominated companies' share of crude oil production had risen again to close to 10 percent.
With its natural gas and oil pipelines that tie Europe to Russia like an umbilical cord, Russia has unchecked
powers and influence that in a real sense exceed the military power and influence it had in the Cold War. No matter how
many nuclear weapons it may have had, the USSR was prevented from using them by the knowledge that the United States had
a comparable number and would counter the USSR's use of them and vice versa. This was referred to as Mutually Assured
Destruction (MAD), which meant no one country would dare attack the other. Now, however, if Russia decides to reduce or
suspend the flow of gas through its pipeline to Ukraine and/or to Europe, there is virtually nothing to restrain it from doing so.
There is no comparable Mutual Assured Restraint or MAR. It is also noteworthy that this gives Russia more economic
clout with Europe than Saudi Arabia. Because the Saudis export relatively little natural gas, there are no consuming countries
dependent on a Saudi pipeline for this commodity. This is an important strategic difference.
195
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Moscow, Russian Federation, 14 October 2004: In a pioneering deal, Sakhalin Energy Investment Company Ltd (Sakhalin Energy)
announced today that it has signed an agreement to supply 37 million tonnes of LNG over a 20 year period to Shell Eastern Trading
Ltd (Shell) for the North American natural gas market. This represents the first sales of Russian natural gas to North America.
The landmark deal marks the beginning of Sakhalin Island as a strategic new source of natural gas for both Mexico and the US West
Coast markets. It confirms Sakhalin Energy as a world-class player in the LNG market, and firmly places Russia in a new strategic
position as a global supplier of natural gas.
LNG from Sakhalin Energy will be purchased by Shell to supply the new Energía Costa Azul plant that will be constructed in Baja
California, Mexico. Natural gas from the new terminal will be used to satisfy Mexico’s growing energy needs, with excess natural gas
exported from the Mexican terminal to California in the US where, as in Mexico, there is an increasing requirement for new natural
gas supply sources. The agreement calls for significantly higher volumes of LNG deliveries during the first three years, with a plateau
supply of 1.6 million tonnes per annum (approximately 0.2 BCF/d).
“Sakhalin Energy and Russia have created a fundamental shift in global natural gas supplies,” commented Ivan Malakhov, Governor
of the Sakhalin Oblast. “Russia has been a reliable supplier of natural gas into the European market via pipeline for many years.
Now, with Sakhalin Energy’s decision, in partnership with the Russian Government, to opt for LNG as the most flexible way to export
natural gas from the Russian Far East, the traditional supply dynamics for natural gas have been transformed. An exciting chapter in
Russian energy supply has been opened”.
196
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
George W. Bush, the president of the United States, February 24, 2005, “President and President Putin Discuss
Strong U.S.-Russian Partnership”, http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/02/20050224-9.html, [T-
Jacob]
Another important and interesting opportunity is our cooperation in the supplies of liquified natural gas. In the year 2010, 2011, a large
amount of liquified natural gas can be supplied from Russia to the United States. Our investment corporation is becoming generally
bilateral. The first steps -- but constant steps are being made by Russian companies that are starting to invest their capital into
American economy. We have also discussed the status and prospects of Russia's cooperation in science, high-tech; in particular, in the
exploration of outer space. In conclusion, I would like to say that I highly appreciate the outcome of this summit. Later this year, we
are going to meet a few more times within the framework of various international fora. I would like to take this opportunity to thank
the President of the United States who has accepted the invitation to participate in the festivities on the occasion of the anniversary of
the great victory on May 9th in Moscow. This is a natural manifestation of respect of historic memory and the memory of the alliance
that bonded our two countries in the years of the second world war.
The Russian Federation is a major player in world energy markets. It has more proven natural gas reserves than any other
country and is among the top ten countries in proven oil reserves. 1 It is the world’s largest exporter of natural gas, the second
largest oil producer and exporter, and the third largest energy consumer. Given that the United States also is a major energy
producer and user, Russian energy trends and policies affect U.S. energy markets and U.S. welfare in general.
197
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
198
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
At the same time, the natural gas monopoly Gazprom, the main player in Russia, is grappling with complaints from minority
shareholders that its business and profits are not transparent enough.
United States Deputy Energy Secretary Kyle E. McSlarrow met this week with executives from Gazprom, the oil producer
Yukos and Transneft, the oil pipeline monopoly, 10 days after Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham met with Kremlin officials
and Russian companies. Their hope is to increase Russia's energy exports to the United States and accelerate Gazprom's
projects to liquefy gas in the Arctic.
The United States is so serious about pursuing natural gas deals with Russia that the United States Export-Import Bank may
help finance a $15 billion project to develop Russia's giant Shtokman field.
''The subject of investment has been discussed, including in the context of proposals which U.S. ExImbank may put forward,''
Russia's deputy industry and energy minister, Ivan Materov, said. Mr. Materov also said that Russia was interested in large
American energy companies participating in the project.
His American counterpart, Mr. McSlarrow, said that liquefied natural gas, or L.N.G., projects have emerged as a way to stave
off an anticipated shortfall in North American natural gas supply.
''Under everybody's scenario, L.N.G. imports will have to increase,'' Mr. McSlarrow said at a news conference this week. ''I
think Russia realizes that it ought to be a major player when it comes to L.N.G.''
The Shtokman deposit, on the shelf of the Barents Sea north of the Arctic Circle, has estimated reserves of 3.2 trillion cubic
meters of gas and 31 million tons of gas condensate. The license to develop it belongs to Gazprom and a subsidiary of
government-owned oil company, Rosneft.
Gazprom wants to sign a deal to develop Shtokman and build a liquefied gas plant, and potential partners mentioned include
Norsk Hydro, ConocoPhillips, ChevronTexaco, ExxonMobil and Shell.
''All the U.S. companies would like to do business with Gazprom,'' said an American official, who spoke on condition of
anonymity.
199
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Ida Garibaldi, visiting research fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, March 25, 2008, “Energy: NATO
between Russia and Europe” http://www.aei.org/publications/pubID.27911,filter.foreign/pub_detail.asp, [T-
Jacob]
In last two years the matter of European energy security has become of outmost importance for the United States and its allies. Indeed,
Russia's recent use of energy to bully Ukraine and Belarus indicate that European energy security represents a serious strategic
challenge for the trans-Atlantic alliance. It is easy to imagine Moscow pushing any EU member to choose between continued supply
of energy or support for a specific U.S. policy. It is in Washington and its allies' interest to back European energy security now before
Russia has too great a hold on the continent. NATO and the next Bucharest summit are the right place to do it. The imports 58.3
percent of its total need for natural gas and 82.8 percent of its total oil needs--of which over 45 and 29.9 percent come from Russia,
respectively. Brussels and Moscow share mutual concern for the stability of their energy relationship. The EU is Russia's biggest
energy export market and a source of steady profit, while without Russia the gas stoves and heating would go out across Europe.
Whether this reciprocal dependency will be sufficient to maintain the durability of the relationship is an open question.
200
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
201
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Ida Garibaldi, visiting research fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, March 25, 2008, “Energy: NATO
between Russia and Europe” http://www.aei.org/publications/pubID.27911,filter.foreign/pub_detail.asp, [T-
Jacob]
American Senator Richard Lugar has argued that NATO should treat the manipulation of energy supply (and its
use as a weapon) as a trigger to apply Article 5 of the Treaty of Washington, which states that an attack against
one member of the alliance should be considered an attack against all members. Including the use of energy as a
weapon under NATO's Article 5 would work as a deterrent against aggressive behavior; developing (and
publicizing) NATO's ability and willingness to supply a member that has come under attack by a hostile
supplier would also greatly reduce the likelihood of such an attack in the first place. In the short and medium
terms, NATO could do more to demonstrate its attention to European energy security. These include
encouraging Romania (a member) and Ukraine (a potential future member) to thoroughly question Russia and
Gazprom about the construction of the South Stream pipeline, which would pump gas from Russia directly into
Europe, bypassing Turkey. Because the pipeline would cross Romanian and Ukrainian economic zones in the
Black Sea, Bucharest and Kyiv have the right under international law to inquire about the project's
environmental impact, shipping and maritime safety, as well as request changes in the pipeline's route. This
could give Washington, Istanbul, and Brussels an opportunity and the time to build consensus around a trans-
Caspian pipeline to bring natural gas from Central Asia to Turkey and the European Union bypassing Russia. It
could also revitalize Nabucco, a EU project to build a pipeline to bring gas from Iran and Azerbaijan to Western
Europe bypassing Russia and diminishing European dependence from Moscow.
202
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Ida Garibaldi, visiting research fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, March 25, 2008, “Energy: NATO
between Russia and Europe” http://www.aei.org/publications/pubID.27911,filter.foreign/pub_detail.asp, [T-
Jacob]
European energy dependence from Russia and the EU's vulnerability to the Kremlin's political blackmail are not
the only reasons that should push NATO to care about European energy security. Al Qaeda's attack off Yemen's
coast on the French oil tanker Limburg in October 2002 showed that NATO can play an important role in
protecting its members' energy security from Islamic terrorism as well. In particular, maritime surveillance of
resource routes and maritime escorts of particularly sensitive targets would help deter attacks and in the event of
an attack would facilitate the dispatch of a rapid response. The largest summit in NATO's history, the Bucharest
meeting will focus on NATO's operations in Kosovo, Afghanistan, Operation Active Endeavor, and a potential
future enlargement. It is a full agenda for a two-day meeting, one that does not have any room left for a
comprehensive discussion on energy security. However, the United States and its European allies should at least
make time to lay out the time frame for future talks on energy security. The longer the United States and its
European allies wait to involve NATO, the more entrenched Russia's presence in Europe will become with
potentially destructive consequences for the trans-Atlantic relationship.
203
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Impacts – Neo-Imperialism
Ida Garibaldi, visiting research fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, March 25, 2008, “Energy: NATO
between Russia and Europe” http://www.aei.org/publications/pubID.27911,filter.foreign/pub_detail.asp, [T-
Jacob]
The Russia-Ukraine gas dispute has raised concerns about Russia’s domestic and foreign affairs, Ukraine’s
sovereignty, and issues of U.S. and international energy security. The Administration appeared to take a cautious
approach toward the Russia-Ukraine dispute over gas pricing, but responded forcefully to the January 1 cutoff.
In common with European governments, the United States emphasized Russia’s culpability. State Department
spokesman Sean McCormack criticized Russia for using “energy for political purposes,” and for acting while
Europe was in the midst of an extreme cold spell. He stressed that while the Administration supported a gradual
increase in prices to market levels, it disagreed with a “precipitous” increase and cutoff. Secretary of State
Condoleezza Rice likewise on January 5 stated that Russia had not appeared to be a “responsible actor in the
international economy” by making “politically motivated efforts to constrain energy supply to Ukraine.” She
warned that such efforts also raised concerns about Russia’s suitability for the 2006 chairmanship of the G-8.10
Some observers argue that U.S. concerns about the gas cutoff should not interfere with higher priority U.S.-
Russian cooperation in combating terrorism or addressing such issues as nuclear proliferation in Iran and North
Korea.11 Others suggest that the cutoff is emblematic of rising Russian neo-imperialism, which threatens
energy security and sovereignty in the Soviet successor states and the wider Euro-Atlantic region. Some of these
observers warn that the West is again faced with containing Russia.12
204
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Russian gas cutoffs create significant national security risk and foreign policy challenges.
Ida Garibaldi, visiting research fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, March 25, 2008, “Energy: NATO
between Russia and Europe” http://www.aei.org/publications/pubID.27911,filter.foreign/pub_detail.asp, [T-
Jacob]
The Russian gas cutoff may increase U.S. government concerns about energy security, including the diversity of liquefied natural gas
(LNG) suppliers. In testimony on February 2, 2006, John Negroponte, the Director of National Intelligence, warned that the gas cutoff
was “an example of how energy can be used [by Russia] as both a political and economic tool,” and that such actions by key producer
states and others “pose significant U.S. national security risks or foreign policy challenges.”13 Deputy Assistant Secretary of State
Matthew Bryza appeared to reflect such concerns during a mid-January 2006 visit with Turkmen President Saparamurad Niyazov.
Reportedly, the two sides discussed cooperation on developing and exporting Turkmen energy resources, in order to “enhance
competition on European markets.” The visit also may have reflected greater U.S. advocacy of multiple oil and gas pipeline routes in
the Caspian Sea region, including those that do not traverse Russia or Iran. The gas cutoff may affect decisions by U.S. firms about
investing in the Russian LNG industry for future imports.14
205
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Ida Garibaldi, visiting research fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, March 25, 2008, “Energy: NATO
between Russia and Europe” http://www.aei.org/publications/pubID.27911,filter.foreign/pub_detail.asp, [T-
Jacob]
The gas cutoff has heightened concerns among some in Congress that U.S.-Russian cooperation on counter-
terrorism and other strategic issues is threatened, and that Russia is failing to democratize, respect the
independence of fellow Soviet successor states, and meet other conditions of U.S. assistance. The cutoff may
also strengthen views among some Members that Russia is not a suitable host for a planned July 2006 G-8
(group of eight industrial democracies) summit in Moscow on energy security. Senator John McCain reflected
such concerns when he called in early February for the G-8 leaders to boycott the summit, in part because of
Russia’s autocratic handling of the gas dispute.16
206
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Impacts – Terrorism
David Kramer, Deputy Assistant Secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs, July 12, 2006, “The
Future Obit of US Russian Relations”, Speech: US State Depart . David, Deputy Assistant Secretary
for European and Eurasian Affairs, “The Future Orbit of US Russian Relations”, Speech: US State
Department, July 2. [T-Jacob]
Our cooperation will include the physical protection of nuclear materials, suppressing illicit trafficking of those
materials, responding and mitigating the consequences of any acts of nuclear terrorism, and cooperating on the
development of the technical means to combat nuclear terrorism, denying safe haven to terrorists, and
strengthening our national legal frameworks to ensure the prosecution of such terrorists and their supporters.
This initiative serves U.S. national security interests. We have invited partner nations to meet in the fall to
elaborate on and endorse a statement of principles for this initiative. It's one we hope to expand.
207
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Helen Caldicott, founder of Physicians for Social Responsibility, 2002, “The New Nuclear Danger”, p. 7-12.
[T-Jacob]
If launched from Russia, nuclear weapons would explode over American cities thirty minutes after takeoff. (China's twenty missiles
are liquidfueled, not solid-fueled. They take many hours to fuel and could not be used in a surprise attack, but they would produce
similar damage if launched. Other nuclear-armed nations, such as India and Pakistan, do not have the missile technology to attack the
U.S.) It is assumed that most cities with a population over 100,000 people are targeted by Russia. During these thirty minutes, the U.S.
early-warning infrared satellite detectors signal the attack to the strategic air command in Colorado. They in turn notify the president,
who has approximately three minutes to decide whether or not to launch a counterattack. In the counterforce scenario the US.
government currently embraces, he does [the U.S.] launch[es], the missiles pass mid-space, and the whole operation is over within one
hour. Landing at 20 times the speed of sound, nuclear weapons explode over cities, with heat equal to that inside the center of the sun.
There is practically no warning, except the emergency broadcast system on radio or TV, which gives the public only minutes to reach
the nearest fallout shelter, assuming there is one. There is no time to collect children or immediate family members. The bomb, or
bombs-because most major cities will be hit with more than one explosion-will gouge out craters 200 feet deep and 1000 feet in
diameter if they explode at ground level. Most, however, are programmed to produce an air burst, which increases the diameter of
destruction, but creates a shallower crater. Half a mile from the epicenter all buildings will be destroyed, and at 1.7 miles only
reinforced concrete buildings will remain. At 2.7 miles bare skeletons of buildings still stand, single-family residences have
disappeared, 50 percent are dead and 40 percent severely injured.' Bricks and mortar are converted to missiles traveling at hundreds of
miles an hour. Bodies have been sucked out of buildings and converted to missiles themselves, flying through the air at loo miles per
hour. Severe overpressures (pressure many times greater than normal atmospheric have popcorned windows, producing millions of
shards of flying glass, causing decapitations and shocking lacerations. Overpressures have also entered the nose, mouth, and ears,
inducing rupture of lungs and rupture of the tympanic membranes or eardrums. Most people will suffer severe burns. In Hiroshima,
which was devastated by a very small bomb-13 kilotons compared to the current iooo kilotons-a child actually disappeared, vaporized,
leaving his shadow on the concrete pavement behind him. A mother was running, holding her baby, and both she and the baby were
converted to a charcoal statue. The heat will be so intense that dry objects-furniture, clothes, and dry wood-will spontaneously ignite.
Humans will become walking, flaming torches. Forty or fifty miles from the explosion people will instantly be blinded from retinal
burns if they glance at the flash. Huge firestorms will engulf thousands of square miles, fanned by winds from the explosion that
transiently exceed 1000 miles per hour. People in fallout shelters will be asphyxiated as fire sucks oxygen from the shelters. (This
happened in Hamburg after the Allied bombing in WWII when temperatures within the shelters, caused by conventional bombs,
reached 1472 degrees Fahrenheit.)" Most of the city and its people will be converted to radioactive dust shot up in the mushroom
cloud. The area of lethal fallout from this cloud will depend upon the prevailing wind and weather conditions; it could cover thousands
of square miles. Doses of 5000 rads (a rad is a measure of radiation dose) or more experienced by people close to the explosion-if they
are still aliv-will produce acute encephalopathic syndrome. The cells of the brain will become so damaged that they would swell.
Because the brain is enclosed in a fixed bony space, there is no room for swelling, so the pressure inside the skull rises, inducing
symptoms of excitability, acute nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, severe headache, and seizures, followed by coma and death within twenty-
four hours. A lower dose of 1000 rads causes death from gastrointestinal symptoms. The lining cells of the gut die, as do the cells in
the bone marrow that fight infection and that cause blood clotting. Mouth ulcers, loss of appetite, severe colicky abdominal pain,
nausea, vomiting, and bloody diarrhea occur within seven to fourteen days. Death follows severe fluid loss, infection, hemorrhage, and
starvation. At 450 rads, 50 percent of the population dies. Hair drops out, vomiting and bloody diarrhea occurs, accompanied by
bleeding under the skin and from the gums. Death occurs from internal hemorrhage, generalized septicemia, and infection. Severe
trauma and injuries exacerbate the fallout symptoms, so patients die more readily from lower doses of radiation. Infants, children, and
old people are more sensitive to radiation than healthy adults. Within bombed areas, fatalities will occur from a combination of
trauma, burns, radiation sickness, and starvation. There will be virtually no medical care, even for the relief of pain, because most
physicians work within The United States owns 103 nuclear power plants, plus many other dangerous radioactive facilities related to
past activities of the cold war. A 1000- kiloton bomb (1 megaton) landing on a standard iooo megawatt reactor and its cooling pools,
which contain intensely radioactive spent nuclear fuel, would permanently contaminate an .' area the size of western Germany3 The
International Atomic Energy Agency now considers these facilities to be attractive terrorist targets, ' post-September 11,2001. Millions
of decaying bodies-human and animal alike-will rot, infected with viruses and bacteria that will mutate in the radioactive-environment
to become more lethal. Trillions of insects, naturally ' resistant to radiation-flies, fleas, cockroaches, and lice--will transmit disease
208
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
from the dead to the living, to people whose immune mechanisms have been severely compromised by the high levels of background
radiation. Rodents will multiply by the millions among the corpses and shattered sewerage systems. Epidemics of diseases now
controlled by immunization and good hygiene will reappear: such as measles, polio, typhoid, cholera, whooping cough, diphtheria,
smallpox, plague,tuberculosis, meningitis, malaria, and hepatitis. Anyone who makes it to a fallout shelter and is not asphyxiated in it,
will need to stay there for at least six months until the radiation decayssufficiently so outside survival is possible. It has been
postulated that perhaps older people should be sent outside to scavenge for food because they will not live long enough to
developmalignancies from the fallout (cancer and leukemia have long incubation periods ranging from five to sixty But any food that
manages to grow will be toxic because plants concentrate radioactive elements.*/ Finally, we must examine the systemic global effects
of a nuclear . , war. Firestorms will consume oil wells, chemical facilities, cities, and forests, covering the earth with a blanket of thick,
black, radioactive , I I ' smoke, reducing sunlight to 17 percent of normal. One year or more ' ) , will be required for light and
temperature to return to normal per-"r haps supernormal values, as sunlight would return to more than its , , usual intensity, enhanced
in the ultraviolet spectrum by depletion of the stratospheric ozone layer. Sub freezing temperatures could destroy the biological
support system for civilization, resulting in massive starvation, thirst, and hypothermia.5 To quote a 1985 SCOPE document published
by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, "the total loss of human agricultural and societal support systems would
result in the loss of almost all humans on Earth, essentially equally among combatant and noncombatant countries alike . . . this
vulnerability is an aspect not currentlya part of the understanding of nuclear war; not only are the major combatant countries in
danger, but virtually the entire human population is being held hostage to the large-scale use of nuclear weapons. . . .",! i The
proposedSTART I11 treaty between Russia and America, even if it were implemented, would still allow 3000 to 5000 hydrogen bombs
to be maintained on alert."he threshold for nuclear winter? One thousand loo-kiloton bombsblowing up loo cities7-a I c distinct
possibility given current capabilities and targeting plans. On January 25,1995, military technicians at radar stations in northern Russia
detected signals from an American missile that hadjust been launched off the coast of Norway carrying a US. scientific probe.
Although the Russians had been previously notified of this launch, the alert had been forgotten or ignored. Aware that US. submarines
could launcha missile containing eight deadly hydrogen bombs fifteen minutes from Moscow, Russian officials assumed that America
had initiated a nuclear war. For the first time in history, the Russian computer containing nuclearlaunch codes was opened. President
Boris Yeltsin, sitting at that computer being advised on how to launch a nuclear war by his military officers, had only a threeminute
interval to make a decision. At the last moment, the US.missile veered off course. He realized that Russia was not under attack.' If
Russia had launched its missiles, the US. early-warning satellites would immediately have detected them, and radioed back to
Cheyenne Mountain. This would have led to the notification of the president, who also would have had three minutes to make his
launch decision, and America's missiles would then have been fired from their silos. We were thus within minutes of global
annihilation that day. ,' Today, Russia's early-warning and nuclear command systems are deteriorating. Russia's early-warning system
fails to operate up to seven hours a day because only one-third of its radars are functional, and two of the nine global geographical
areas covered by its missilewarning satellites are not under surveillance for missile detection.9 TO make matters worse, the equipment
controlling nuclear weapons malfunctions frequently, and critical electronic devices and computers sometimes switch to combat mode
for no apparent reason. According to the CIA, seven times during the fall of 1996 operations at some Russian nuclear weapons
facilities were severely disrupted when robbers tried to "mine" critical communications cables for their copper!'" This vulnerable
Russian system could easily be stressed by an internal or international political crisis, when the danger of accidental or indeed
intentional nuclear war would become very real. And the U.S. itself is not invulnerable to error. In August 1999, for example, when the
National Imagery and Mapping Agency was installing a new computer system to deal with potential Y2K problems, this operation
triggered a computer malfunction which rendered the agency "blind" for days; it took more than eight months for the defect to be fully
repaired. As the New York Times reported, part of America's nuclear early-warning system was rendered incompetent for almost a
year." (At that time I was sitting at a meeting in the west wing of the White House discussing potentially dangerous Y2K nuclear
weapons glitches. Several Pentagon officials blithely reassured me that everything would function normally during the roll-over. But
in fact, their intelligence system had already been disabled.) Such a situation has the potential for catastrophe. If America cannot
observe what the Russians are doing with their nuclear weapons-or vice versa-especially during a serious international crisis they are
likely to err on the side of "caution," which could mean that something as benign as the launch of a weather satellite could actually
trigger annihilation of the planet.This situation became even more significant after the September 11 attack.
209
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Russian economic collapse causes a civil war that escalates and goes nuclear
If internal war does strike Russia, economic deterioration will be a prime cause. From 1989 to the present, the GDP has fallen by 50
percent. In a society where, ten years ago, unemployment scarcely existed, it reached 9.5 percent in 1997 with many economists
declaring the true figure to be much higher. Twenty-two percent of Russians live below the official poverty line (earning less than $ 70
a month). Modern Russia can neither collect taxes (it gathers only half the revenue it is due) nor significantly cut spending. Reformers
tout privatization as the country's cure-all, but in a land without well-defined property rights or contract law and where subsidies
remain a way of life, the prospects for transition to an American-style capitalist economy look remote at best. As the massive
devaluation of the ruble and the current political crisis show, Russia's condition is even worse than most analysts feared. If conditions
get worse, even the stoic Russian people will soon run out of patience. A future conflict would quickly draw in Russia's military. In the
Soviet days civilian rule kept the powerful armed forces in check. But with the Communist Party out of office, what little civilian
control remains relies on an exceedingly fragile foundation -- personal friendships between government leaders and military
commanders. Meanwhile, the morale of Russian soldiers has fallen to a dangerous low. Drastic cuts in spending mean inadequate pay,
housing, and medical care. A new emphasis on domestic missions has created an ideological split between the old and new guard in
the military leadership, increasing the risk that disgruntled generals may enter the political fray and feeding the resentment of soldiers
who dislike being used as a national police force. Newly enhanced ties between military units and local authorities pose another
danger. Soldiers grow ever more dependent on local governments for housing, food, and wages. Draftees serve closer to home, and
new laws have increased local control over the armed forces. Were a conflict to emerge between a regional power and Moscow, it is
not at all clear which side the military would support. Divining the military's allegiance is crucial, however, since the structure of the
Russian Federation makes it virtually certain that regional conflicts will continue to erupt. Russia's 89 republics, krais, and oblasts
grow ever more independent in a system that does little to keep them together. As the central government finds itself unable to force its
will beyond Moscow (if even that far), power devolves to the periphery. With the economy collapsing, republics feel less and less
incentive to pay taxes to Moscow when they receive so little in return. Three-quarters of them already have their own constitutions,
nearly all of which make some claim to sovereignty. Strong ethnic bonds promoted by shortsighted Soviet policies may motivate non-
Russians to secede from the Federation. Chechnya's successful revolt against Russian control inspired similar movements for
autonomy and independence throughout the country. If these rebellions spread and Moscow responds with force, civil war is likely.
Should Russia succumb to internal war, the consequences for the United States and Europe will be severe. A major power like Russia
-- even though in decline -- does not suffer civil war quietly or alone. An embattled Russian Federation might provoke opportunistic
attacks from enemies such as China. Massive flows of refugees would pour into central and western Europe. Armed struggles in
Russia could easily spill into its neighbors. Damage from the fighting, particularly attacks on nuclear plants, would poison the
environment of much of Europe and Asia. Within Russia, the consequences would be even worse. Just as the sheer brutality of the last
Russian civil war laid the basis for the privations of Soviet communism, a second civil war might produce another horrific regime.
Most alarming is the real possibility that the violent disintegration of Russia could lead to loss of control over its nuclear arsenal. No
nuclear state has ever fallen victim to civil war, but even without a clear precedent the grim consequences can be foreseen. Russia
retains some 20,000 nuclear weapons and the raw material for tens of thousands more, in scores of sites scattered throughout the
country. So far, the government has managed to prevent the loss of any weapons or much material. If war erupts, however, Moscow's
already weak grip on nuclear sites will slacken, making weapons and supplies available to a wide range of anti-American groups and
states. Such dispersal of nuclear weapons represents the greatest physical threat America now faces. And it is hard to think of anything
that would increase this threat more than the chaos that would follow a Russian civil war.
210
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
The issue of energy security is increasingly playing an impact on U.S.-Russian relations. U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice
criticized Russia for its "politically motivated efforts to constrain energy supply to Ukraine," drawing a rebuke from Russia's Foreign
Ministry. But Russia has U.S. energy consumers in mind as well. Russia's state-controlled energy giant, Gazprom, has sought a 10
percent U.S. market share by 2010, according to the company's deputy chairman, Alexander Medvedev. From Russia's standpoint, the
United States is especially seen as a lucrative export destination for liquefied natural gas (LNG), shipped via Russia's Shtokman field
in the Barents Sea, north of the Arctic Circle (LNG is gas frozen into liquid and shipped in refrigerated tankers and then warmed back
into its gaseous state on delivery).
211
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
RUSSIA AFF
212
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
2AC – RUSSIA
1. Non-unique: Russia relations terrible in status quo.
M. K. Bhadrakumar, career diplomat for Indian foreign services, June 19, 2008, “Russia’s energy drive leaves
reeling”, http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Central_Asia/JG19Ag01.html. [T-Jacob]
Washington hit back by ensuring that Russian companies are left out in the cold from the 30 contracts for lucrative oil deals that
Baghdad is awarding. It is a big blow for Russia. In February, Moscow had written off US$12 billion or 93% of Iraq's debt to Russia
in a move that was widely seen as aimed to help Russian oil company LUKoil regain the Saddam Hussein-era rights to develop Iraq's
giant West Qurna-2 oil field. But under US pressure, the Iraqi government is now awarding West Qurna-2 to the US's Chevron. The
Kremlin didn't show any anger, but coincidence or not, Gazprom chief executive Alexei Miller suddenly arrived in Tehran on Monday
and discussed with Iranian President Mahmud Ahmadinejad the setting up of an organization of gas-producing countries. No doubt,
with the Russian foothold in Libya (which has estimated natural gas reserves of 1.47 trillion cubic meters), in coordination with
Algeria (which currently supplies over 10% of Europe's gas supplies), Qatar (with proven natural gas reserves of 25.8 trillion cubic
meters) and Iran (which has the world's second-largest reserves after Russia), the time for a "Gas OPEC" is approaching. The Iranian
leader also suggested to Miller a market-sharing arrangement so that Russia and Iran could "collectively meet the demands of Europe,
India and China in the gas sector". During the visit, an agreement was signed on the development of Iran's oil and gas fields by
Russian companies; on Russian participation in the transfer of Iran's Caspian Sea crude oil to the Oman Sea; cooperation in the
development of Iran's fabulous North Azadegan oil field; and, possible participation of Gazprom in the planned Iran-Pakistan-India
gas pipeline project. Evidently, Moscow took a deliberate decision to press ahead with Iran in energy cooperation in the full glare of
world publicity in complete disregard of US displeasure. Tehran loved it. To quote a US expert, "Russia's strategic interest in Iran
implicitly underscores the futility of hopes that Moscow would cooperate with Washington in imposing meaningful sanctions on Iran.
While Western European companies are moving out of Iran or suspending agreements for fear of US sanctions (which penalize
investments of more than $20 million a year in Iran's oil and gas sector), Gazprom is enlarging the already existing foothold."
Conceivably, the danger of losing out on the last energy frontier to Russia (and China) could be a factor in Washington's policy shift
on Iran talks. Washington calls the u-turn "a strong signal to the Iranian government that the United States is committed to
diplomacy". But according to The New York Times, Rice has decided to "test Iran's willingness to consider an international package of
incentives meant to coax Iran into making concessions on its nuclear program". What we do not know is how close the Bush
administration may be for involvement in Iran's energy sector, which is an element in the so-called "international package of
incentives". (Halliburton, which Vice President Dick Cheney headed, was a very active player in Iran.)
213
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
2AC – RUSSIA
2. Non-unique: Russia collapse imminent.
Dave Kimble, civil libertarian writer and writer for the centre for research on development, May 21, 2006,
“Collapse of Petrodollar Looming”,
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=KIM20060521&articleId=2486. [T-Jacob
Russia's oil exports represent 15.2% of the world's export trade in oil, making it a much more significant player than Iran, with 5.8%
of export volumes. Russia also produces 25.8% of the world's gas exports, while Iran is still only entering this market as an exporter.
GlobeAndMail.com is reporting that President Chavez of Venezuela is considering following Iran's move towards pricing oil in Euros.
Venezuela has 5.4% of the export market, although since the bulk of his country's exports are of heavy oil to the US, where it needs
special facilities to process it, it would be a very brave or foolhardy President that told the US to buy its oil in Euros, or else ...
Nevertheless, you can see the attraction for any country wanting to apply some pressure on the world's superpower. And where
Venezuela leads, Bolivia may not be far behind. You can see how this could quickly get out of control. While the Iranians have been
suffering numerous delays in implementing their bourse, Russia could have their oil market up and running almost as soon as their
currency market is ready to take on the work load, which might only be a few months away. Some commentators on the Iranian
proposal have suggested that the impact on the US Dollar would not be so great because the greenback is used for all sorts of trade,
not just oil, so 5.8% of the international oil trade is really only a small part of the bigger picture. This argument looks a bit weak if
both Russia and Iran will be lowering the demand for Dollars to buy oil and gas. In order to counter the reduced demand for US
Dollars, the standard control lever available to the Federal Reserve is to increase interest rates, over and above what it was going to be
doing. This has the usual unwelcome consequences of dampening the US economy, and squeezing people with mortgages, which in
turn leads to rising wages, falling house prices and a slump in the construction industry. At the same time, lower demand for Dollars
will weaken its conversion rate, making imports more expensive. With rising wages, fuel bills and debt-servicing feeding through into
prices for home-produced goods, the stage is set for either an inflationary spiral or a recession. In the short term, the inflationary route
always looks to be the less painful, but it can only lead eventually to a crisis of confidence in US Dollars, when traders abandon the
paper and rush for the exit. US-Russian relations slide It cannot have escaped the notice of the Russians that this announcement is a
poke in the eye for the US. So its timing can hardly be an accident, coming less than a week after US Vice President Dick Cheney's
address to a conference in Vilnius, Lithuania, where he attacked Russian energy policy, in front of an audience of European heads of
state. "No legitimate interest is served when oil and gas become tools of intimidation or blackmail, either by supply manipulation, or
attempts to monopolise transportation", Cheney said, referring to the Ukrainian gas cut-back (that Ukraine provocatively passed on to
the downstream customers in western Europe). The next day Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov fired back "[the] U.S. vice
president should be informed that for the last 40 years neither the U.S.S.R. nor the Russian Federation has ever broken a single
contract for oil and gas supplies abroad." The antagonism continued to verberate when Lavrov met US Sectretary of State
Condoleezza Rice at a foreign ministers' summit in New York on Iran's nuclear programme. As well as criticising Cheney's comments,
Lavrov also attacked Rice's number three, Nicholas Burns, for his criticism of Russia's assistance with Iran's Bushehr nuclear facility.
"This meeting isn't going anywhere", snarled Rice, perhaps angry that the rebuke of Burns reflected badly on her. Burns himself was
probably a bit cranky after his trip to Moscow in April, when he publicly asked Russia not to go ahead with the sale of Tor-M1 mobile
anti-missile missiles to Iran, only to be bluntly rebuffed by Russian Chief of Staff, General Yury Baluyevsky. Meanwhile the world
looks on, hoping that the great powers really know what they are doing, and that World War 3 won't start because of a subtle
miscalculation in brinkmanship.
214
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
2AC – RUSSIA
3. Non-Unique: Russia hasn’t imported an ounce of LNG to the U.S.
4. No Internal link: Because of large supply, the U.S. will not become dependent on Russia for natural
gas
Marshall I. Goldman, Kathryn Wasserman Davis Professor of Russian Economics (Emeritus) at Wellesley
College, former associate Director of the Davis Center for Russian Studies at Harvard University from 1975 to
2006, M.A. and Ph.D. degrees in Russian studies and economics from Harvard University, honorary Doctor of
Laws degree from the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Fulbright-Hayes Lecturer at Moscow State
University, State Department consultant, May 27, 2008, Petrostate: Putin, Power, and the New Russia, Oxford
University Press, Pg. 7
Equally unusual, even though there are no natural gas pipelines connecting the United States with Russia, Gazprom is also beginning
to export LNG (liquified natural gas) to the United States. For the time being, because Gazprom as yet lacks the technology to produce
LNG on its own, it is a swap arrangement. These shipments under the Gazprom label actually originate in Algeria (in exchange,
Gazprom pipes gas to some of Algeria's customers in Europe), but by 2010, Gazprom anticipates (unrealistically) that it will supply as
much as 10 percent of the natural gas the United States needs as LNG directly from its own fields.' Given that the United States has
fairly large natural gas reserves of its own and supplements domestic production with imports by pipeline from Canada, it is unlikely
that the United States will ever become as beholden to Russia for its energy as Germany or Austria have become. Yet Russia's
emergence as an energy superpower will have a long term impact on U.S. and world diplomacy if for no other reason than that our
European allies will begin to think twice before saying "no" to Russia.
5. Internal link turn: If Russia uses its influence in the U.S. through energy, the U.S. market will rebel
crushing relations
Marshall I. Goldman, Kathryn Wasserman Davis Professor of Russian Economics (Emeritus) at Wellesley
College, former associate Director of the Davis Center for Russian Studies at Harvard University from 1975 to
2006, M.A. and Ph.D. degrees in Russian studies and economics from Harvard University, honorary Doctor of
Laws degree from the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Fulbright-Hayes Lecturer at Moscow State
University, State Department consultant, May 27, 2008, Petrostate: Putin, Power, and the New Russia, Oxford
University Press, Pg. 206
This implies that U.S. policy should encourage Russian companies to invest in the United States, especially when they provide goods
and services that supplement those sold by others. In the same way, the more assets owned by Russian entities outside of Russia, the
more Russian firms are likely to feel pressure to conform to international standards. Thus, if Gazprom should for some reason decide
to withhold delivery of LNG to its U.S. customers, as a countermeasure those customers might well decide to seize Russian owned
assets as a hostage. In the same way, companies like LUXoi1 should be encouraged to compete in U. S. markets by exporting Russian
petroleum to the gasoline service stations that it owns here. (This is also a way to diversify oil imports.) 'When Russia is able to act as
a monopolist, however, such investments are more problematic building a natural gas pipeline that gives them monopoly power over
consumers in the territory served by that pipeline would be an example.
215
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
2AC – RUSSIA
6. No link: disadvantage link isn’t predicated specifically off of the affirmative case
Noah Shachtman, writer for national security online network database, June 9, 2008, “Moseley: Gates was
Right; ‘Zero Chance’ of War with China or Russia”, http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/06/moseley-gates-
w.html. [T-Jacob]
Defense Secretary Robert Gates fired Air Force Chief of Staff General "Buzz" Moseley after repeatedly accusing the service
of being unable to focus on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. In a fascinating interview with Air Force Times , conducted
right after his removal, Moseley said the critiques were dead-on. It's an eye-opening admission. For years, Moseley's
generals have been warning about the dangers of China and a resurgent Russia -- and downplaying today's
counterinsurgency conflicts. Now, Moseley is saying there is "an almost zero chance we will fight a nation-state" like Russia
or China. Which makes you wonder why the Air Force has been so preoccupied with these countries.
216
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
AFF – Non-Unique
U.S. moving away from Gazprom
International Herald Tribune, February 22, 2008, “A U.S. official says Europe needs alternatives to Russian
natural gas”, http://www.iht.com/bin/printfriendly.php?id=10314070, Accessed July 15, 2008 CM
BRUSSELS: A U.S. State Department official said Friday that Europe needed alternatives to Russian natural gas that enriched "shady
middlemen," putting forward the idea of Iraq and Azerbaijan as new suppliers.
Matthew Bryza, the U.S. deputy assistant secretary of state for southeastern Europe, was critical of Gazprom, the state-controlled
Russian national gas behemoth, saying the United States did not like energy monopolies.
"We especially don't like them when they threaten at least the economic security of our most important allies," Bryza said. He
criticized the company for charging too much and trying to undermine European efforts to seek new sources and routes for more
natural gas.
He said the U.S. government strongly backed the Nabucco pipeline, sponsored by the European Union and aimed at bringing more
natural gas to Europe from the Caspian Sea region. That pipeline could help Iraq earn energy dollars and benefit another U.S. ally,
Azerbaijan.
Bryza said the United States was concerned that Europeans were paying "gigantic rents" for natural gas that Gazprom buys from
supplier nations like Turkmenistan for as little as $100 for 1,000 cubic meters, or 35,000 cubic feet, and sells to Europe for nearly
$300.
"When you have these gigantic rents generated because of the difference in price between Central Asia and Europe, some not so
savory people get involved in the distribution of that money," he said.
Bryza was referring to Semyon Mogilevich, a Ukrainian-born Russian citizen accused by the United States of running an organized
crime ring in the 1990s. Mogilevich was involved with the Ukrainian gas export company RosUkrEnergo.
The United States wants Gazprom to behave more like a Western energy company, by investing most of its profits into producing and
transporting more natural gas instead of buying up strategic energy infrastructure in Europe "that's the pattern today," he said.
217
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Russia has not hesitated in the past to cut off the flow of both petroleum and gas to strengthen its side of a political dispute, a
practice it inherited from its forebears in the Soviet Union's Ministry of the Gas Industry and Ministry of the Petroleum
Industry. Europeans are realizing how dependent on Russia they have become as each year they rely more and more on Russian
natural gas imports. Gazprom and, by extension, the Russian government are already beginning to enjoy a power over their
European neighbors far beyond the dreams of the former Romanov czars or the Communist Party general secretaries. President
Vladimir Putin, with his control of Gazprom as well as another state owned petroleum company, Rosneft, had become a real
life Dr. No an archetypal James Bond villain, complete with a yacht and retinue. As President Putin at the time noted in a three
hour meeting following our Gazprom visit, Gazprom and Rosneft are very real and each year are accumulating more and more
wealth and international influence, which they are using to advance the interests of the Russian state.
218
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
But it is not only Europe that finds itself each day becoming more and more dependent on energy exports from Russia. Although
the United States is separated from Russia by oceans, it also is beginning to import and consume more and more Russian energy. As in
Europe, the United States is trying to reduce its overreliance on energy imports from the Middle East. As part of this diversification, in
2005 the United States imported dose to $8 billion worth of Russian petroleum. In woO, that jumped by 25 percent to $1o billion.
True, that represented only 3 percent of our petroleum imports small, but an increase from the 2.2 percent of 2004 and a hint that we
are likely to increase imports in the future.' More than that, in woo, LUKoi1, one of Russia largest private oil companies, purchased
nearly 3,000 filling stations in the United States from Getty Oil and Mobil and is now busily converting them into LUKoil outlets. It
also should be noted that in woO, Russia became the world's largest producer of petroleum, producing more than Saudi Arabia. This is
not the first time Russia has produced more petroleum than anyone else. It also reigned as the world's largest producer in the late
1970s and 198os. Even this was not unprecedented. As Table Intro. r indicates, Czarist Russia from 1898 to 1901 also produced more
oil than the United States, until then the leader.
219
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Equally unusual, even though there are no natural gas pipelines connecting the United States with Russia, Gazprom is also
beginning to export LNG (liquified natural gas) to the United States. For the time being, because Gazprom as yet lacks the technology
to produce LNG on its own, it is a swap arrangement. These shipments under the Gazprom label actually originate in Algeria (in
exchange, Gazprom pipes gas to some of Algeria's customers in Europe), but by 2010, Gazprom anticipates (unrealistically) that it will
supply as much as 10 percent of the natural gas the United States needs as LNG directly from its own fields.' Given that the United
States has fairly large natural gas reserves of its own and supplements domestic production with imports by pipeline from Canada, it is
unlikely that the United States will ever become as beholden to Russia for its energy as Germany or Austria have become. Yet Russia's
emergence as an energy superpower will have a long term impact on U.S. and world diplomacy if for no other reason than that our
European allies will begin to think twice before saying "no" to Russia.
220
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
As Russia customers have awakened to how vulnerable they have become to future cuts in their energy supplies, there are
signs that this overdependence on Russian gas is already forcing at least some in Europe to have second thoughts about standing up to
Russia. Nor are the European consumers the only ones who find themselves very much at the mercy of Gazprom. So far Gazprom also
determines the fate of three other large exporters of natural gas. To their dismay, if they want to sell natural gas to Europe, Central
Asian gas producers such as Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan, and Uzbekistan have no alternative but to ship it through the Gazprom
pipeline. This is a legacy of the Soviet era when it was only logical to consolidate shipments of gas produced within the republics of
the Soviet Union through one unified system. After all, what did it matter if the gas to be exported came from Uzbekistan and transited
through Russia? They were both parts of the Soviet Union. But when the Soviet Union disintegrated in 1991, Gazprom assumed
ownership of the bulk of that pipeline, and the newly independent countries in Central Asia, which were previously republics of the
USSR, had no other outlet of their own to the West. As a result, this post 1991 monopoly control of the natural gas pipeline allows
Gazprom to hold down the price it pays to the Central Asian producers for their gas. In 2006, for example, Gazprom paid less than $50
per 1,000 cubic meters while selling this same gas to the Europeans at prices averaging $230 per 1,000 cubic meters.
Working with energy and government officials in Central Asia, some European countries and the United States have sought
to break that monopoly by lining up support for a bypass natural gas pipeline that would be built under the Caspian Sea and link
Central Asia to Azerbaijan. There it would parallel an oil pipeline that goes then to Georgia and Turkey. To be called NABUCCO, this
pipeline would then run through Bulgaria, Romania, Hungary; and on eventually to Western Europe.
221
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
222
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
March 5, 2006--Fifteen years after the collapse of the Soviet Union, “U.S.-Russia relations are clearly headed in the wrong
direction,” finds an Independent Task Force on U.S. policy toward Russia sponsored by the Council on Foreign Relations. “Contention
is crowding out consensus. The very idea of a ‘strategic partnership’ no longer seems realistic,” it concludes. The bipartisan Task
Force was chaired by former Senator John Edwards and former Congressman and Housing and Urban Development Secretary Jack
Kemp and directed by Council Senior Fellow Stephen Sestanovich. The Task Force notes significant recent economic progress in
Russia. “Between 2000 and 2004 the number of Russians living below the government’s poverty line dropped from forty-two million
to twenty-six million. The national unemployment rate--over 10 percent in 2000--is now about 7 percent...[and] a middle class appears
to be emerging.”
Bush had just used unusually hawkish words at this press conference to describe the nuclear tension with Iran. Clearly referring to
Putin, Bush had told reporters, "If you're interested in avoiding World War III, it seems like you ought to be interested in preventing
Iran from having the knowledge necessary to make a nuclear weapon." That reference to "World War III" was reminiscent of earlier
presidential rhetoric like "The Axis of Evil" (Bush, 2002) and "The Evil Empire" (Reagan, 1983). The choice of words reflected a
deep chill in US-Russian relations -- and differences over Iran are not the only reason for the falling out. "The relationship is really
shaken. Both sides appear determined to verbally assault each other as often as possible over the coming months," says Rose
Gottemoeller, Director of the Moscow office of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace in an interview with SPIEGEL
ONLINE.
223
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
FLARING
224
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
SHELL – FLARING
A. Natural gas prices will continue to rise this winter, multiple warrants
CNN, 7/3/08, “Avista warns of continued natural gas price hikes”, CNN money
http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/apwire/919e35e0554e2f663d1af503d11a7862.htm#TOP //EM
NEW YORK (Associated Press) - Normally, natural gas prices are low in the summer months and utilities stock up for
sale in the winter. This year, though, a spike in energy prices is also hitting natural gas, which likely means higher prices
for consumers this winter, Avista Corp. warned Wednesday. Kevin Christie, Avista's director of gas supply, said prices rose
from an average of $7.39 per dekatherm in June 2007 to $12.81 per dekatherm last month, a 73 percent increase. A
typical home in the utility's service areas in Eastern Washington, northern Idaho and Oregon uses about seven dekatherms a
month. "The combination of an unusually long winter and cold spring created higher demand for natural gas, which
depleted storage reserves across the country," Christie said in a release. High prices for crude oil, plus lower natural gas
imports into the United States, are also pushing prices up, Christie said. The lack of lower spring and summer prices
means natural gas rates for customers will likely increase when Avista files its annual "purchase gas cost adjustments"
in September, although the amount of the increase remains undetermined, Christie said.
B. Link:
Simultaneously with household use, alternative energy is going to become popular with corporations and businesses. The price of oil
is continually rising and global supplies of light sweet crude oil are running out. Also, oil production is controlled by a cartel of
countries who drive the price up and make oil overpriced in American markets. This is going to make oil an unattractive option for
industrial purposes in the future. The prospects for coal, natural gas and nuclear are also bad, due to both financial and environmental
reasons. Global supplies of coal, natural gas and uranium are becoming depleted, and these energy sources produce pollution on a
scale that is undesirable. These factors are going to lead businesses and corporations to turn to alternative energy sources for their
electricity. There are many cases of businesses using green building to reduce energy costs and relying on renewable energy to have a
reliable and cost-effective source of power. As alternative energy supplies become economically feasible they will be adopted by
conventional businesses, to the point of becoming mainstream in the future, and the companies that supply alternative energy stand to
make substantial profits by supplying energy to these companies.
Several factors will also make the American government support the development of alternative energy. The first is the need for
energy independence. The disaster of hurricanes Katrina and Rita showed that the American supply of petroleum, based on
pipelines coming from the gulf coast, is unstable due to potential bad weather conditions, and alternative energy sources will
help America become less dependent upon oil pipelines. More importantly, alternative energy will also help America become
less dependent upon foreign oil, particularly from the Middle East, which is in the national interest. American dependence upon
foreign oil is a major issue due to the political instability of the Middle East, it involves a huge political and military
commitment by the United States to peace in the Middle East, and alternative energy will help to alleviate the situation and
enable America to break free from dependence upon the Middle East and foreign oil. This could help America disentangle itself
from its problematic relations with Iraq, Iran, and the other major oil-producing countries of that region. In fact, the American
government has already enacted several measures to promote the alternative energy industry, both giving grants for research
and taking steps to make alternatives more competitive through government incentives, and more are sure to come.
225
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
SHELL – FLARING
2. High natural gas prices deter flaring as more gas will be transferred to the market place.
United States Government Accountability Office, Report to the Honorable Jeff Bingaman, Ranking Minority Member,
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, U.S. Senate, July 2004, http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-
bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=gao&docid=f:d04809.pdf
Although most natural gas production involves extracting gas from wells
drilled into underground gas reservoirs, some natural gas is generated as a
by-product of oil production. Gas produced during oil production is called
associated gas. During oil and gas production, it may be necessary to burn
or release natural gas for a number of operational reasons, including
lowering the pressure to ensure safety. Burning natural gas is known as
flaring, while releasing natural gas directly into the atmosphere is called
venting. In addition to the operational reasons for flaring and venting, in
areas where the primary purpose of drilling is to produce oil, producers
flare or vent associated natural gas because no local market exists for the
gas and transporting it to a market may not be economically feasible.2
Natural gas prices are a major determinant of whether associated gas is
flared and vented or sold. Associated natural gas would be sold if prices
were high enough over a long enough period to justify building the
infrastructure—pipelines and ports—to transport the gas to a market. In
the United States, there are well-developed natural gas markets and
infrastructure to reduce the flaring and venting of associated natural gas.
However, in parts of the world like Africa and the Middle East, where the
natural gas market and infrastructure for transporting gas are not as welldeveloped,
flaring and venting are generally more prevalent. With increases
in natural gas prices, some countries have recognized the potential of
increasing exports to high-demand countries like the United States using
liquefied natural gas (LNG) technology. These countries liquefy the natural
gas and transport it in specially designed tanker ships to the United States
and other countries. When the liquefied gas arrives at an import facility, the
liquid is returned to a gaseous state and transported to a market.
226
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
SHELL – FLARING
C. Impacts
1) Flaring and venting emit methane which is “23 more times potent than CO2 in its ability to warm the
planet.” Stopping flaring is key to preventing global warming.
United States Government Accountability Office, Report to the Honorable Jeff Bingaman, Ranking Minority Member,
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, U.S. Senate, July 2004, http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-
bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=gao&docid=f:d04809.pdf
227
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
SHELL – FLARING
2. Global Climate change will lead to security threats for the US as the military is inhibited in its ability to
respond to rapid climate changes.
Richard F. Pittenger & Robert B. Gagosian, Center for Technology and National Security Policy
National Defense University, October 2003, Defense Horizons.
http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/websites/nduedu/www.ndu.edu/inss/DefHor/dh33/dh33.pdf
228
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Link – Oil
Increased oil production lowers the cost of natural gas resulting in flaring.
United States Government Accountability Office, Report to the Honorable Jeff Bingaman, Ranking Minority Member,
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, U.S. Senate, July 2004, http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-
bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=gao&docid=f:d04809.pdf
While flaring and venting represent only 3 percent of the total natural gas
production, the natural gas flared and vented—about 100 billion cubic
meters a year—is enough to meet the annual natural gas consumption of
both France and Germany. In general, the amount of flaring and venting
emissions is related to the amount of oil produced: the higher the
production, the more gas flared and vented. Since 1990, the quantity of oil
produced has increased, but because of various global reduction initiatives,
the quantity of natural gas flared and vented has remained constant.
Consequently, natural gas emissions as a percentage of oil production have
decreased.
229
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Franz Gerner et al., Bent Svensson, Sascha Djumena (a senior energy specialist,with the World Bank Group’s
Oil and Gas Policy Division.), October 2004, Public Policy for the private sector. “Gas Flaring and Venting,”
<< http://www.eapirf.org/MenuItems/Resources/Papers/Energy/rsrc304.pdf>>
230
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Michiko Ishisone, UCLA Berkeley, December 2004, Gas Flaring in the Niger Delta: the Potential Benefits of
its Reduction on the Local Economy and Environment. <<http://ist-
socrates.berkeley.edu/~es196/projects/2004final/Ishone.pdf>>
From an economic perspective, the Nigerian government’s main interest in the oil industry is to maximize its monetary profits
from oil production (ESMAP 2001). Oil companies find it more economically expedient to flare the natural gas and pay the
insignificant fine than to reinject the gas back into the oil wells. Additionally, because there is an insufficient energy market
especially in rural areas (GGFR 2002), oil companies do not see an economic incentive to collect the gas.
231
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
New Scientist, 7-12-2007, Rising gas prices could end wasteful flaring.
<<http://environment.newscientist.com/article/dn12250>>
Dwindling energy supplies and rising gas prices could soon make gas flaring unprofitable, say researchers, saving billions of dollars'
worth of natural gas from going up in smoke.
Historically, producers have simply burned gas found alongside oil if it was too difficult and costly to recover and sell it. In recent
years, concerns about global warming have added to pressure to end the practice. But analysts say harsh economic reality is the factor
that really concentrates minds.
The US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) estimates that 168 billion cubic metres (bcm) of gas were
flared in 2006 – equivalent to 27% of the US natural gas consumption (read NOAA's gas flaring report). NOAA says the flared gas
could have fetched $69 billion if sold.
"Until you start to put real value into gas prices, you might as well flare. But now gas prices are getting to the point where it's worth
collecting," says Jonathan Stern of the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies in the UK.
The effect of higher prices, however, has yet to be felt. According to NOAA, gas flaring remained constant – between 150 bcm and
170 bcm – from 1995 to 2006.
232
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Alberta department of Immigration and Industry, Oil and Gas Extraction Industry, 6-2006,
http://www.alis.gov.ab.ca/occinfo/IndustryDescriptions/oilgasextract.htm
The outlook for the Natural Gas industry in the North American economy looks bright. Alberta accounts for over 80 per cent of
Canadian natural gas production. Half of Alberta’s natural gas production is exported to the United States. A quarter of the production
is exported to other provinces. Demand for exported Alberta gas will rise significantly as natural gas producers in the United States
struggle to keep pace with demand. Such demand will reduce Alberta’s natural gas reserves but will generate exploration and
development along with more processing plants, pipelines and storage facilities.
Natural Gas in Coal (NGC), also known as coal bed methane, is a relatively new venture in Alberta. The feasibility of NGC
production is not completely known but there is potentially 500 trillion cubic feet (over double the reserves of traditional natural gas)
of NGC in Alberta.
233
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Flaring and venting emit methane which is “23 more times potent than CO2 in its ability to warm the
planet.”
United States Government Accountability Office, Report to the Honorable Jeff Bingaman, Ranking Minority Member,
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, U.S. Senate, July 2004, http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-
bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=gao&docid=f:d04809.pdf
234
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Industry methane emissions are primarily from venting but can also occur from leaks. At the time of this commitment the EU
had been looking into European methane emissions (see the OGP web site). The EU concluded that the offshore industry was
not a large contributor - the greatest quantities come from agriculture, refuse tips and marsh land - and that most practical
measures offshore had already been taken.
Methane from livestock manure accounts for 0.6 percent of total greenhouse gas emissions in the United States. Methane is 23
times more potent than carbon dioxide (CO2) in trapping heat in the atmosphere and is released into the air through common
manure-handling practices. Through the methane-capture program, ECC will install covers on manure storage lagoons to
capture and flare (burn off) methane, converting it to CO2, a much less-potent greenhouse gas. Capturing and flaring the
methane from manure lagoons significantly reduces the greenhouse gases, as well as odors, emitted from livestock farms. It
also helps prevent issues with pests, rainfall and dust.
235
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Impacts – Warming
Gas flaring releases methane, CO2 and other harmful gasses into the CO2
Safiya Yakubu, Daily Trust (Abuja) Nigeria, March 10, 2008, “Nigeria: Gas Flaring in the Niger Delta and Its
Health Hazards”, http://allafrica.com/stories/200803100319.html, Accessed July 19, 2008
Gas flaring also contributes to ozone depletion and this leads to the exacerbation of the problem of global warming. CFCs or
chlorofluorocarbons are the primary cause of ozone depletion. When industrial processes release these chemicals, they rise into
the atmosphere and degrade the ozone layer. Gas flaring, not only in the Niger Delta, but also in Nigeria is highly inefficient
and releases large amount of methane which has very high global warming potential. Other green house gasses include carbon
dioxide etc.
Dr. Rajendra K Pachauri, Tata Energy Research Institute, 7-14-2008, The Times of India [Editorial],
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Editorial/Stand_Up_And_Deliver/articleshow/3229474.cms
Clearly, limiting emissions will not be possible unless very clear targets are established for the year 2020 that would allow a
beginning of reductions by 2015. Not taking early action in reducing GHG emissions would lead to severe impacts of climate
change being experienced in different parts of the world.
Unfortunately, the worst consequences of these impacts will be felt by some of the poorest communities and countries, who
have had hardly any role in contributing to the evolution of this problem. GHG emissions have come overwhelmingly from the
developed countries, but the heaviest price in terms of impacts of climate change is being paid by some of the poorest
countries.
To this extent at least the G8 leaders have either proved unaware of or insensitive to the vulnerability of the worst affected
societies. There are several examples of the impacts on vulnerable regions and communities. In Africa alone by 2020 about 75
to 250 million people will be affected by water stress resulting from climate change and there is likely to be a 50 per cent
decline in agricultural yields in certain countries. This would expose some of these societies to the danger of famine and
massive malnutrition. Even today, over 50 countries regularly import food to meet their basic needs. With a decline in
agricultural yields, an unprecedented increase in global food prices and oil, there would be very little capacity or economic
means available with these nations to be able to stave off large-scale starvation, with the prospect of disruption of peace and
security.
236
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Impacts – Military
Global Climate change will lead to security threats for the US as the military is inhibited in its ability to
respond to rapid climate changes.
Richard F. Pittenger & Robert B. Gagosian, Center for Technology and National Security Policy
National Defense University, October 2003, Defense Horizons.
http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/websites/nduedu/www.ndu.edu/inss/DefHor/dh33/dh33.pdf
237
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Sara C. Aminzadeh, J.D. candidate, University of California, Hastings College of the Law, Winter 2007, A
Moral Imperative: The Human Rights Implications of Climate Change, [Lexis/Nexis Academic] - Hastings
College of the Law Hastings International and Comparative Law Review.
A recent Nigerian case successfully adopted a human rights approach to address an environmental injustice, though climate change
was only a tangential issue. n38 In June 2005, communities from the Niger Delta filed a case in the Federal High Court of Nigeria
against Shell, ExxonMobil, ChevronTexaco, the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation, and the Nigerian government to stop gas
flaring. n39 Gas flaring is an environmentally destructive process used [*238] by oil refineries, oil wells, chemical plants, and
landfills to burn off and vent unusable waste gas. This case focused on resultant air and water pollution, though Nigeria's practice of
gas flaring also causes more GHG emissions than all other sources in sub-Saharan Africa combined. n40
The Niger Delta communities argued that the practice of gas flaring and failure to undergo environmental impact assessments
violated Nigerian gas flaring regulations and, significantly, the Delta communities' human rights. n41 The communities specifically
cited climate change as a harm caused by the flaring, which was incorporated into the Court's judgment: "The burning of gas by
flaring in their n42 community ... contributes to adverse climate change as it emits carbon dioxide and methane which causes
warming of the environment." n43 The Court ordered that gas flaring must stop in the Niger Delta community as it violates
guaranteed constitutional rights to life and dignity. n44 The Nigerian case is one of the first where a national court held that climate
change, like other environmental issues, may implicate human rights.
238
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Impact: Gas flaring renders those in undeveloped countries as disposable peoples by subjecting them to
lower safety standards than those of developed countries.
Koriambanya S.A. Carew, Drake University Drake Journal of Agricultural Law, Summer 2002, [Lexis/Nexis
Academic], DAVID AND GOLIATH: GIVING THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLE OF THE NIGER DELTA A SMOOTH PEBBLE--
ENVIRONMENTAL LAW, HUMAN RIGHTS AND RE-DEFINING THE VALUE OF LIFE.
http://www.lexisnexis.com/us/lnacademic/results/docview/docview.do?docLinkInd=true&risb=21_T4182951255&format=GNBFI&sort=BOOLE
AN&startDocNo=1&resultsUrlKey=29_T4182951259&cisb=22_T4182951258&treeMax=true&treeWidth=0&csi=166248&docNo=3
Another pollution source found in the Niger Delta is gas flaring. Human rights activists and environmental publicists have
documented that the constant gas flaring has led to the creation of acid rain and release of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. n53
According to many activists and residents of the Niger Delta, acid rain has substantially destroyed the plant life and wildlife in the
region. n54 The people of the Niger Delta have noticed a change in their habitat, but also report that they suffer from respiratory
diseases and are partially deaf from the constant noise from the gas flares. n55 This is in addition to the disproportionate
increase in incidents of cancer and other organic diseases linked to the water pollution. n56
In addition to the fact that Shell does not use the same operating standards that it uses in developed nations, Shell has also
been resistant to other suggestions that would safeguard the habitat of the Nigeria people. For instance, in 1997, Pensions
Investments Research Consultants ("PIRC") announced that the environmental report issued by Shell was inadequate. n57 PIRC then
issued a resolution asking that Shell accept independent environmental audits. n58 According to PIRC, independent environmental
audits are accepted in the oil industry as best practice. n59 For example, British Petroleum, another oil giant, has an environmental
audit conducted by Ernst and Young annually. n60 Shell declined to adopt this recommendation and announced that each of its
businesses would decide whether or not to audit. n61 Following this announcement, eleven percent of Shell's shareholders "voted for
an overhaul of the oil company's position on environmental issues" and voted to support the PIRC resolution. n62 Shell Nigeria
reportedly will be adopting the suggested PIRC policy. n63
239
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Impacts – Communities
Gas flaring is really bad for communities – laundry list
Ofeibea Quist-Arcton, a journalist and broadcaster from Ghana who reports for NPR News on issues and
developments related to West Africa., July 24, 2007, “Gas Flaring Disrupts Life in Oil-Producing Niger Delta”,
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=12175714, Accessed July 19, 2008 CM
Every year, millions of dollars are literally going up in smoke in Nigeria, Africa's top crude oil-exporting nation, as companies
burn off unwanted natural gas released during oil production.
This flaring and venting produces more greenhouse-gas emissions than any other single source in Africa south of the Sahara,
and many who live in Nigeria's oil-producing communities complain of chronic health and environmental problems associated
with the gas flares.
Much of the region where oil is pumped is a maze of winding mangrove creeks and waterways. Leafy, green and humid,
Ebocha-Egbema is an unremarkable collection of small villages with tin-roof houses and shops, located in the heart of the
Rivers State in Nigeria's turbulent oil-producing Niger Delta.
Huge flames billow in the air over Ebocha, and above them, black clouds leap into the sky. The giant gas flares operated by
Agip-Nigeria belch out noxious fumes that loom over homes, farms and shops. There's a strange smell and an audible hiss in
the air.
Residents of the Niger Delta region, where Ebocha is located, say gas flaring is ruining lives and livelihoods. Chief Eze
Kingsley Okene, a local traditional leader and retired chemist, says Nigeria isn't doing enough to curb the practice.
"Yes, we are living with death, because of [the] oil company," Chief Okene says.
While many villagers may not be familiar with the concept of climate change, they complain that the air around them is hotter
and foul-smelling because of the gas flares. Chief Okene's wife, Roseline organizes protests against gas flaring, which she says
produce poisons that kill crops and make villagers sick.
"If you put water in a basin, you see that the water will change to charcoal — black and slippery," Roseline says. "You cannot
wash it out without soap. ... So if [a] human being drinks such water, it will affect a human being."
In the areas close to the gas flares, medical staff report treating patients with all sorts of illnesses that they believe are related to
the flames: bronchial, chest, rheumatic and eye problems, among others. Some are referred to Ebocha-Egbema's General
Hospital, which is being completely refurbished.
The hospital's senior nursing officer, Anthonia Chioma Ike, is from another part of Nigeria, but after eight years of living and
working in the vicinity of the gas flares, she's furious about what's going on.
"I don't feel fine. I feel afraid. I feel that something might happen one day that will cause a disaster in the community … Like
fire. Like people around that area always come here complaining that they are having internal heat. ... And they say they don't
sleep because of the noise of that place," Chioma says. "From here, you'll be hearing the noise ... As if something is falling
from up, from height. They say every time it seems the house and everything will explode."
240
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
FLARING AFF
241
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
2AC – FLARING
1. Lack of infrastructure is the reason for flaring, not low prices.
John Donnelly, Globe Staff, 6-21-2007, The Boston Globe, “Russia top offender in gas flaring emissions,” [Google
Scholar].
<<http://www.boston.com/news/world/europe/articles/2007/06/21/russia_top_offender_in_gas_flare_emissions/>>
[MM]
WASHINGTON -- A little-known but major contributor to global warming -- gas flaring at oil wells -- has been measured for the first
time using satellite imagery and shows that Russia is burning three times more gas than previous estimates, making it the world's
worst offender, according to a new US study.
At many oil drilling sites around the world, producers ignite excess gas, sending huge balls of fire into the sky. Environmentalists and
World Bank analysts say the practice -- called gas flaring -- needlessly harms the environment and wastes a lucrative energy source.
When companies drill for oil in underground caverns, their equipment brings to the surface both petroleum and natural gas. Producers
burn the gas because they have no infrastructure to use it, or no immediate consumer. In some cases, such as at some of Russia's
isolated oil wells, the nearest possible user of natural gas could be more than 1,000 miles away.
The report was completed by scientists at the US National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration in Colorado using Air Force
meteorological satellite images dating to 1995. It reveals that the amount of carbon dioxide emitted from Russia's gas flaring alone
equals the combined emissions from all cars and trucks in New York state and New England.
United States Government Accountability Office, Report to the Honorable Jeff Bingaman, Ranking Minority
Member, Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, U.S. Senate, July 2004, http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-
bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=gao&docid=f:d04809.pdf [MM]
In addition, the government could investigate the public’s
perceptions of the risk associated with new infrastructure. For example,
some communities have resisted LNG facilities because they are worried
about the safety and security procedures in place to protect them from an
accidental explosion or a terrorist attack. Finally, the federal government
could continue to work with other countries and corporations to reduce
flaring and venting. For example, USAID provided much of the funding for
training regulators in Kazakhstan, where improved regulation has virtually
eliminated the routine flaring of natural gas. In addition, the United States
could continue to support the work of the World Bank’s Global Gas Flaring
Reduction Partnership (GGFR), which recently issued standards on how to
achieve reductions in the flaring and venting of gas worldwide.
242
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
INDUSTRIES DA
243
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
A. Natural Gas prices are plunging, they have fallen 20% from their peak price
Midnight Trader, 7/17/08, Comtex News Network “Oil, Natural Gas Prices Tumble in Volatile Trading, Lifting
Stocks” pg lexis //EM
Oil prices are tumbling for the third straight day and natural gas futures are selling off amid growing concerns that a weaker U.S. economy
and consumer reaction to high gas prices will slash demand. Light, sweet crude for August delivery is down $3.50 at $131.10 a barrel on the
New York Mercantile Exchange in extremely volatile trading. Oil is now down about $14 in the last three days.the AP reports. Natural gas
prices are also plunging, down 82.6 cents at $10.572 per 1,000 cubic feet. It has tumbled more than 20% since its peak in July.
B. Demand in the transportation sector won’t drop, Natural gas demand from hydrogen cars would
directly trade off with lowering oil demand
Philip Hopkins, Logistics Reporter, 5/19/08, The Age First Edition, “Transport Hazy on Cutting Emissions” pg lexis
//EM
Mr Wheaton said diesel had fewer emissions than petrol, although there were issues with heavy particulates. Other fuels such as liquefied
natural gas or compressed natural gas had lower emissions. BMW had built a prototype hydrogen car. "But the infrastructure is not
there. We have to build it," he said. Mr Wheaton said gas-based fuel and new technology could reduce emissions. "The question is what path
do we take to that," he said. "Our thinking is not too clear about that . . . 25 years are needed for breakthrough technologies such as telephones
and computers." Mr Wheaton said in theory, change in the transport sector could occur quickly, "but not in practice," Cars were
produced relatively fast, but trucks, aircraft and ships had much longer lives. Mr Wheaton said reducing emissions by reducing
demand was not an option in transport. "Those in logistics do not want to cut (customer) demand," he said.
244
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
C. High natural gas prices destroy the chemical industry, sending the entire manufacturing industry in a
downward spiral which destroys the economy
Paul Bjacek, staff writer, 11/6/06, ICIS chemical business America, “Lost Manufacturing” pg lexis //EM
LOST MANUFACTURING or "de-industrialization" is occurring in the US and other developed countries as semifinished and finished goods
manufacturing investment shifts to countries with a cost advantage, such as China.US chemical producers, with a total of over $180 billion in
assets on US soil, are painfully aware that the country is seeing downstream industrial development impeded by high costs. They must respond
strategically, using innovation and customer collaboration.ANALYSIS RESULTSDomestic demand for manufactured goods will outstrip
domestic industrial production over the next 10 years and imports will fill the gap, according to an Accenture Research study for the ACC
(American Chemistry Council).According to the study, which quantifies the impact of lost downstream manufacturing (of 17 selected
industries) on the future chemical industry, domestic production of finished goods (in aggregate) will still increase over the period, but imports
will rise faster.This implies that US manufacturers will lose market share and, therefore, chemical manufacturers will lose the demand for
chemicals associated with manufacturing these products. The total chemical sales opportunity losses represent just 2.4% of the expected
$8 trillion total manufacturing industry sales opportunity losses (or cumulative net trade losses by 2015) caused by lost manufacturing.
The estimated cumulative opportunity losses (based on trade losses) for the chemical sector over 10 years consist of $188bn in chemical
sales, including $50bn in sales from the top seven thermoplastic resins $40bn in capital expenditures in chemicals, including $5bn for
new thermoplastics capacity $30bn in chemical research and development expenditures $43bn in US government tax revenue from
chemical companies $3bn in charitable contributions from chemical companies and 157,000 chemical industry-related jobs. The loss of
these chemical industry-related jobs by 2015 is a particularly painful blow to the US economy because nearly 50% of chemical industry
employees are "knowledge workers" with university degrees and training, whose principal tasks involve the development or
application of specialized knowledge in the workplace. The US industrial economy is interdependent, with chemicals accounting for
5% or more of production costs in at least six other major US industries - textiles, the business of chemistry, plastics and rubber
products, semiconductor & electronic components, paper products and nonmetallic mineral products. These industries generate nearly
$1.2 trillion in total revenue. Declines in output in any one of these corresponds to declines in chemicals potential demand. However, the
volume of chemicals decline depends on the amount of chemicals used in a downstream industry, as well as the projected change in production
of that same industry. Taking into account both of these factors, chemicals used in the production of plastics and rubber products, petroleum
and coal, food, and textile products will be subject to the largest loss of potential demand. Besides relatively higher labor and regulatory costs
in the US, high energy prices are contributing to the decline of US industrial production. High, volatile natural gas costs and unreliable
supplies affect electricity costs and, in the case of chemicals, raw material costs as well. Volatility also causes uncertainty in production
planning and volume expansion. Energy is the largest input factor for most base chemicals, so reliable, low cost energy supplies are
critical to ensuring chemical industry competitiveness.
245
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Midnight Trader, 7/17/08, Comtex News Network “Oil, Natural Gas Prices Tumble in Volatile Trading, Lifting
Stocks” pg lexis //EM
Oil prices are tumbling for the third straight day and natural gas futures are selling off amid growing concerns that a weaker U.S. economy
and consumer reaction to high gas prices will slash demand. Light, sweet crude for August delivery is down $3.50 at $131.10 a barrel on the
New York Mercantile Exchange in extremely volatile trading. Oil is now down about $14 in the last three days.the AP reports. Natural gas
prices are also plunging, down 82.6 cents at $10.572 per 1,000 cubic feet. It has tumbled more than 20% since its peak in July.
B. Cap and trade causes major shift from coal to natural gas, spiking prices which crushes chemical agricultural and
metal industries.
Gas Market Report, 11/16/07, Inside F.E.R.C.’s Gas Market Report, “Lawmakers Fear Heavy Reliance on Gas Via
GHG Bill Could Cripple US Economy”, pg lexis //EM
A top House negotiator on climate change legislation warned Tuesday that any program to cap greenhouse gas emissions must ensure that
the US economy doesn't become overly reliant on natural gas. Representative Rick Boucher, chairman of the Energy and Commerce
subcommittee charged with drafting a bill to cut emissions tied to global warming through a cap-and-trade program, reiterated a big fear on
Capitol Hill: that a precipitous rise in natural gas prices would cripple the economy. "If electric utilities default in large numbers from
using coal to using natural gas, gas prices will spike. They will be multiples of what they are today," Boucher said. "That would be very
difficult for the 58% of homeowners who heat with natural gas." The chemicals, metals and agriculture sectors, among others, would
be broadly dislocated if coal-fired utilities default to cleaner-burning gas, he maintained.
C. Ag Key To Econ
Peter Chalk, analyst for RAND corporation, October 2001, “Terrorism Infrastructure Protection and the U.S. Food and
Agriculture Sector, RAND CONGRESSIONAL TESTIMONY, npg.
Agriculture and the general food industry remain absolutely critical to the social, economic and, arguably, political stability of the US,
indirectly constituting roughly two percent of the country’s overall domestic gross domestic product (GDP). One in eight people work in
some component of agriculture – more if food production is included – making the industry one of the US’ largest employers.
1http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:ZrCVxe3WCZ4J:www.rand.org/publications/CT/CT184/CT184.pdf+%22terroris
m,+infrastructure+protection%22+AND+RAND+AND+Chalk&hl=en - 5Cattle and dairy farmers alone earn between US$50
and US$54 billion a year through meat and milk sales, while roughly US$50 billion is raised every year through agricultural exports. The
share of produce sold overseas is more Comments made by Noreen Hynes during the International Conference on Emerging Infectious
Diseases (ICIED), Atlanta, Georgia, July 16-19 2000. than double that of other US industries, which gives agriculture major importance
in terms of the American balance of trade.2These figures represent only a fraction of the total value of agriculture to the country, as
they do not take into account allied services and industries such as suppliers, transporters, distributors and restaurant chains.
3http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:ZrCVxe3WCZ4J:www.rand.org/publications/CT/CT184/CT184.pdf+%22terroris
m,+infrastructure+protection%22+AND+RAND+AND+Chalk&hl=en - 6The down stream effect of any deliberate act of
sabotage/destruction to this highly valuable industry would be enormous, creating a tidal wave effect that would be felt by all these sectors,
impacting, ultimately, on the ordinary citizen him/herself.
246
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Thomas Bearden, Lt. Col in US Army,6/24/00, “The Unnecessary Energy Crisis”, Free Republic, p. online //wyo-tjc
History bears out that desperate nations take desperate actions. Prior to the final economic collapse, the stress on
nations will have increased the intensity and number of their conflicts, to the point where the arsenals of
weapons of mass destruction (WMD) now possessed by some 25 nations, are almost certain to be released. As an
example, suppose a starving North Korea launches nuclear weapons upon Japan and South Korea, including U.S. forces
there, in a spasmodic suicidal response. Or suppose a desperate China-whose long-range nuclear missiles (some) can
reach the United States-attacks Taiwan. In addition to immediate responses, the mutual treaties involved in such
scenarios will quickly draw other nations into the conflict, escalating it significantly. Strategic nuclear studies have
shown for decades that, under such extreme stress conditions, once a few nukes are launched, adversaries and potential
adversaries are then compelled to launch on perception of preparations by one's adversary. The real legacy of the MAD
concept is this side of the MAD coin that is almost never discussed. Without effective defense, the only chance a nation
has to survive at all is to launch immediate full-bore pre-emptive strikes and try to take out its perceived foes as rapidly
and massively as possible. As the studies showed, rapid escalation to full WMD exchange occurs. Today, a great
percent of the WMD arsenals that will be unleashed, are already on site within the United States itself. The resulting
great Armageddon will destroy civilization as we know it, and perhaps most of the biosphere, at least for many
decades.
247
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Demand in the transportation sector won’t drop, Natural gas demand from hydrogen cars would directly
trade off with lowering oil demand
Philip Hopkins, Logistics Reporter, 5/19/08, The Age First Edition, “Transport Hazy on Cutting Emissions” pg
lexis //EM
Mr Wheaton said diesel had fewer emissions than petrol, although there were issues with heavy particulates. Other fuels such
as liquefied natural gas or compressed natural gas had lower emissions. BMW had built a prototype hydrogen car. "But
the infrastructure is not there. We have to build it," he said. Mr Wheaton said gas-based fuel and new technology could
reduce emissions. "The question is what path do we take to that," he said. "Our thinking is not too clear about that . . . 25 years
are needed for breakthrough technologies such as telephones and computers." Mr Wheaton said in theory, change in the
transport sector could occur quickly, "but not in practice," Cars were produced relatively fast, but trucks, aircraft and
ships had much longer lives. Mr Wheaton said reducing emissions by reducing demand was not an option in transport.
"Those in logistics do not want to cut (customer) demand," he said.
248
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Jenny Mandel, reporter, 11/15/07, Greenwire, “AUTOS: Honda Shows Fuel Cell Concept Car, Home Filling
Station” pg lexis // EM
The refueling stations are more of a hand-wave. Honda says the systems will connect to a home's natural gas supply to
generate hydrogen for a car and heat and electricity for a home, but Ra was fuzzy on how it would feed in heat and
stressed that the system is still experimental. She said the concept is that the systems could ultimately be purchased like any
other appliance to generate a portion of a household's electricity -- about 4 kilowatts -- as well as hydrogen fuel to help
bridge the gap before public hydrogen filling stations become ubiquitous.
They say that hydrogen cars increase efficiency, but they do this by trading oil demand for natural gas
demand, while overall demand is decreased, natural gas demand is increased, causing a raise in prices
249
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Implementing a cap and trade program would increase natural gas prices
Joseph Chang, staff writer, 3/19/07, ICIS Chemical Business, “Living in a Green World” pg lexis //EM
California, led by governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, has already passed legislation mandating emissions caps on industry for
the first time in history. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) is asking for a federal bill on emissions caps by July. "This is a
big concern, whether it's summary execution at the federal level or death by duck bites at the state level," says Drevna. "I can't
say the states are serious when they're considering this - they may just be trying to prod the federal government into taking
some action with their particular proposal. It's one thing for California to set up goals, but putting those goals into actual
legislative language and regulatory approaches will prove to be much more daunting." Congress must be very careful not to
create winners and losers in this debate, something easily achieved with emissions cap and trading proposals, warns
NPRA. "Congress has a hard time passing legislation that doesn't create winners and losers, but this one is so critical
that every nuance has to be carefully dissected to make sure there's a full understanding as to what the ultimate impacts
are - not only on industry-specific sectors such as refining and petrochemicals, but also on the overall economy," says
Drevna. Emissions caps would cause natural gas prices to rise, hurting the petrochemical industry, according to NPRA.
Utilities, the leading consumer of natural gas, would be further incentivised to use clean burning natural gas rather
than coal. "Any time you force fuel switching by any regulation, the impact has been less supply and higher price,"
Drevna points out. "If you start forcing the obvious choice for those in the system to use more natural gas, prices will rise
and there will be demand destruction within certain sectors. Unfortunately, one of those sectors will be the domestic
petrochemical industry. That's why we're saying: Don't create winners and losers! Be careful how you do this cap and trade."
While utilities will be able to easily pass along higher natural gas prices to consumers through rate increases, the petrochemical
industry has no such luxury, NPRA adds. The threat to the US petrochemical industry and further downstream to the overall
manufacturing sector, is palpable. However, this has received little attention among policy makers. "One of the things we are
trying to get policymakers and opinion leaders to focus on is the fact that if you don't produce the petrochemicals domestically,
and if you're not producing the plastic pellets here in the US, there is absolutely no reason to make the products that are derived
from those pellets here," Drevna points out. "I don't think anyone has really focused on that. It's the quintessential ripple effect.
We're looking at the destruction of the US manufacturing sector." Regardless, it appears there will be significant movement on
emissions caps in the 110th Congress. "Anyone intellectually honest about the situation would have to admit that we are fast
approaching the day that some sort of legislation will be enacted," says Drevna.
250
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
States News Service, 11/15/07, “News Analysis: Carbon Mandate Would Harm Consumers, Jobs and
Economy” pg lexis //EM
In response to a request from Senators George V. Voinovich (R-OH), John Barrasso (R-WY) and James Inhofe (R-OK) sent in
mid-September, EIA found that cap-and-trade legislation, without new nuclear power plants and rapid deployment of
biomass and clean coal technology, will cause huge increases in electricity and natural gas prices. "The energy supply
crisis in the United States is sending jobs to China, destroying our manufacturing communities and forcing consumers
to pay even higher energy bills," Sen. Voinovich said. "If we pass cap-and-trade legislation without increasing energy
supplies, our country could face an economic catastrophe, and what' left of our good-paying jobs could vanish."
Cap and trade causes major shift from coal to natural gas, spiking prices which crushes chemical
agricultural and metal industries.
Gas Market Report, 11/16/07, Inside F.E.R.C.’s Gas Market Report, “Lawmakers Fear Heavy Reliance on Gas
Via GHG Bill Could Cripple US Economy”, pg lexis //EM
A top House negotiator on climate change legislation warned Tuesday that any program to cap greenhouse gas emissions
must ensure that the US economy doesn't become overly reliant on natural gas. Representative Rick Boucher, chairman of
the Energy and Commerce subcommittee charged with drafting a bill to cut emissions tied to global warming through a cap-
and-trade program, reiterated a big fear on Capitol Hill: that a precipitous rise in natural gas prices would cripple the
economy. "If electric utilities default in large numbers from using coal to using natural gas, gas prices will spike. They
will be multiples of what they are today," Boucher said. "That would be very difficult for the 58% of homeowners who
heat with natural gas." The chemicals, metals and agriculture sectors, among others, would be broadly dislocated if
coal-fired utilities default to cleaner-burning gas, he maintained.
251
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Regulations force the chemical industry to cut back, catalyzing an increase in natural gas prices and
starting a snowball effect
Alan Lammay, staff writer, 5/5/08, Natural Gas Week, “Chemical Business-Cycle Downturn Could be Bearish
for Gas Market” pg lexis //EM
After a decade of economic growth, the US chemical industry is bracing itself for a possible downturn in its business
cycle. Worries about a slowdown in the US , skyrocketing natural gas prices, the security of future energy supplies, and
the growing burden of regulations in many regions, are all signs that tough times may be ahead. It could also be a
bearish catalyst for natural gas prices as the industry begins to decelerate.
252
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Chemical industry on the brink, slight recovery from recent slowdown now but volatile natural gas prices
are a major threat
Kate Phillips, staff writer, 6/30/08, Chemical Week, “ACC Expects Industry Production to stall and Slow U.S.
Economy” pg lexis //EM
Growth in U.S. chemicals has stalled since third-quarter 2007, due to a manufacturing slowdown. "A build-up of
downstream customer inventories and subsequent drawdown occurred with adverse effects on chemical industry
production, despite rising exports," Swift says. "Downstream inventory destocking, however, appears to be running its
course, and recent months have seen some improving activity." Continued recovery in volumes coupled with slow
capacity gains pushed overall operating rates to 79.2% last year, Swift says. Capacity utilization will be near 80% by 2010,
he says. "A major risk at this point" in the U.S. chemical cycle is volatile natural gas costs as long-term supply-demand
imbalances remain, Swift says. "A comprehensive U.S. energy policy ensuring adequate and diverse supply -- including that
from Outer Continental Shelf -- would go far in moderating volatility and supporting the competitive position of U.S. industry,"
he says.
253
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Internals – Manufacturing
Natural gas price increases are devastating to industry, causes rising product prices
Rick Barret, staff writer, 4/6/06, Knight Ridder/ Tribune Business News, “Industrial Spark”
http://www.redorbit.com/news/science/460790/industrial_spark/ //EM
Factories and other industrial operations use about one-third of the natural gas consumed in the United States. Besides
being used to heat buildings and run production lines, the fuel is used as a raw ingredient in products such as plastics,
fabrics, fertilizers and chemicals. Every $1 increase in natural gas prices adds $3.7 billion in costs for the chemical
industry alone, according to the American Chemistry Council. Those costs are eventually reflected in thousands of
products. Metal-fabrication industries have felt the sting of high gas prices when using the fuel to run large furnaces that
provide heat treatments of steel and stainless steel products such as fasteners, shafts and gears.
254
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
High natural gas prices destroy the chemical industry, sending the entire manufacturing industry in a
downward spiral that destroys the economy
Paul Bjacek, staff writer, 11/6/06, ICIS chemical business America, “Lost Manufacturing” pg lexis //EM
LOST MANUFACTURING or "de-industrialization" is occurring in the US and other developed countries as semifinished and
finished goods manufacturing investment shifts to countries with a cost advantage, such as China.US chemical producers, with
a total of over $180 billion in assets on US soil, are painfully aware that the country is seeing downstream industrial
development impeded by high costs. They must respond strategically, using innovation and customer collaboration.ANALYSIS
RESULTSDomestic demand for manufactured goods will outstrip domestic industrial production over the next 10 years and
imports will fill the gap, according to an Accenture Research study for the ACC (American Chemistry Council).According to
the study, which quantifies the impact of lost downstream manufacturing (of 17 selected industries) on the future chemical
industry, domestic production of finished goods (in aggregate) will still increase over the period, but imports will rise
faster.This implies that US manufacturers will lose market share and, therefore, chemical manufacturers will lose the demand
for chemicals associated with manufacturing these products. The total chemical sales opportunity losses represent just
2.4% of the expected $8 trillion total manufacturing industry sales opportunity losses (or cumulative net trade losses by
2015) caused by lost manufacturing. The estimated cumulative opportunity losses (based on trade losses) for the
chemical sector over 10 years consist of $188bn in chemical sales, including $50bn in sales from the top seven
thermoplastic resins $40bn in capital expenditures in chemicals, including $5bn for new thermoplastics capacity $30bn
in chemical research and development expenditures $43bn in US government tax revenue from chemical companies
$3bn in charitable contributions from chemical companies and 157,000 chemical industry-related jobs.The loss of these
chemical industry-related jobs by 2015 is a particularly painful blow to the US economy because nearly 50% of
chemical industry employees are "knowledge workers" with university degrees and training, whose principal tasks
involve the development or application of specialized knowledge in the workplace.The US industrial economy is
interdependent, with chemicals accounting for 5% or more of production costs in at least six other major US industries
- textiles, the business of chemistry, plastics and rubber products, semiconductor & electronic components, paper
products and nonmetallic mineral products. These industries generate nearly $1.2 trillion in total revenue. Declines in
output in any one of these corresponds to declines in chemicals potential demand. However, the volume of chemicals
decline depends on the amount of chemicals used in a downstream industry, as well as the projected change in production of
that same industry. Taking into account both of these factors, chemicals used in the production of plastics and rubber products,
petroleum and coal, food, and textile products will be subject to the largest loss of potential demand. Besides relatively higher
labor and regulatory costs in the US, high energy prices are contributing to the decline of US industrial production. High,
volatile natural gas costs and unreliable supplies affect electricity costs and, in the case of chemicals, raw material costs
as well. Volatility also causes uncertainty in production planning and volume expansion. Energy is the largest input
factor for most base chemicals, so reliable, low cost energy supplies are critical to ensuring chemical industry
competitiveness.
255
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Natural gas is the principal feedstock for the US chemical industry, which is a key job provider and
essential to the US economy
Chemical Workforce grows by 2%Shipments of US chemical products remain strong and sector employment is at a three-year
high, but the onset of winter weather may accelerate prices for gas feedstock, said industry economists.Latest data on rail car
loadings of chemical products show increasing cargo volumes in nine of the past 13 months, said the American Chemistry
Council (ACC).The US chemicals industry continues to take on new workers, with 2,000 added in October alone,
bringing employment in the sector to a three-year high, it said. The chemicals industry workforce, which numbered
897,800 last month, has grown by more than 18,000 jobs, or 2%, since October last year, according to Department of
Labor data. Industry economists expressed concern, however, that the early onset of North American winter weather has
triggered the first draw-downs against underground stores of natural gas and may soon begin upward pressure on gas
pricing. Natural gas is the principal feedstock for the US chemicals manufacturing sector.On the broader economy, the
ACC pointed to a continued cooling in many parts, particularly in construction and manufacturing - two crucial downstream
consuming sectors for chemicals.In addition, sales of vehicles were reported down 2.3% in September and the Institute for
Supply Management manufacturing index declined in October for the fourth consecutive month. On the plus side, personal
incomes rose by a better-than-expected 0.5% in September, extending a lengthy run of strong increases and suggesting
continuing potential for consumer spending, the principal engine of the US economy.
256
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Chemical industry key to US economy, preventing disease spread, ensuring food supply and drinking
water, stopping fires, manufacturing fighter jets, satellites, space shuttles, and nanotech
Senator James Inhofe, expert on national security issues and chairman of Environmental public works
committee, 8/2/06, US Fed News, “Sen. Inhofe Issues Statement On Toxic Substances Control Act, Chemicals
Management Program At Epa” pg lexis //EM
The chemical industry is a crucial part of the US economy. The United States is the number one chemical producer in
the world, generating $550 billion a year and putting more than 5 million people to work. More than 96% of all
manufactured goods are directly touched by chemistry.
Chemicals are the essential building blocks of products that safely and effectively prevent, treat and cure disease;
ensure the safest and most abundant food supply in the world; purify our drinking water and put out fires. They are the
foundation for life-saving vaccines, child safety seats, bicycle helmets, home insulation, and Kevlar vests. Innovations in
chemistry have helped to increase energy efficiency and to make planes, fighter jets, satellites and space shuttles safer
and more secure. We are also on the cusp of new and exciting chemical advances in the form of nanotechnology. These
tiny chemicals have the potential to cure cancers, clean up pollution, and make cars stronger and lighter than ever
before. To say that chemicals are vital is an understatement.
257
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Joe Kamalick, staff writer, 9/11/06 ICIS chemical business America, “Chemicals remain a tempting target” pg
lexis //EM
FIVE YEARS after the September 11 terrorist attacks - a 21st Century Pearl Harbor - the chemical industry has by all accounts
made significant strides in antiterrorism security but remains vulnerable to what some authorities fear will be an inevitable and
perhaps devastating attack. Ever since 9/11, chemical production, storage and transit facilities have been seen as potential
targets for terrorists, targets where highly toxic compounds are stored or used in large volumes and could cause horrific
casualties if ignited or otherwise released into surrounding communities. While the potential for terrorist use of chemical
facilities as weapons of mass destruction is widely acknowledged, the question of how to deal with that risk has divided policy-
makers, Congress and the industry itself. Underlying the debate in government and within industry is this core question: How
can we protect the chemical industry without smothering it? The crucial role that chemical production plays in the US
economy and defense profile was brought into sharp relief by last year's double hurricane strikes along the Gulf Coast.
ASSESSING THE DAMAGE In assessing the damage done by hurricanes Katrina and Rita, Department of Homeland
Security (DHS) assistant secretary Robert Stephan says, "The impact of those storms on the US refining and
petrochemical industries made it clear that those industries represent a key element in our national defense production
machine."There is no evidence that any chemical facility has been the target of a terrorist plot - at least none that US
intelligence officials will admit. Still, the risk seems palpable in the wake of continuing efforts by directed or rogue terrorist
groups to strike at vulnerable targets of opportunity overseas, such as the attacks on the Madrid and London subway systems
and the more recent UK-based plot to blow up US-bound airliners. "My instinct is that chemical facilities are probably on the
short list of vulnerable targets for Al Qaeda," says Lt. Gen.
258
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Business Wire, 5/31/07, “The US Chemical industry is the world’s largest Producer with a balance of trade
surplus in excess of $15 billion” pg lexis //EM
The US Chemical Industry is the world's largest producer by a substantial margin with a balance of trade surplus in
excess of $15 billion. It is a major player contributing 21% in GDP to the US economy. This growth has led many
theorists to conclude that the industry is a "harvester" rather than an "investor" for future growth.
Senator James Inhofe, expert on national security issues and chairman of Environmental public works
committee, 4/29/08, Congressional Documents and Publications, “Inhofe Hearing Statement on EPA Toxic
Chemicals Policies” pg lexis //EM
Good morning. Today's hearing is to examine the adequacy of the mechanisms for the evaluation and regulation of chemicals
by the EPA. The subject is important because the chemical industry is a crucial part of the U.S. economy, and we have to be
mindful of what we put at risk if we over-regulate this industry and stifle its 30 year history of innovation. Here are some
statistics. The United States is the number one chemical producer in the world, generating $635 billion a year and
putting more than 5 million people to work. The U.S. chemical industry paid more than $27.8 billion in federal, state,
and local income taxes in 2006. More than 96% of all manufactured goods are directly touched by chemistry.
Prime Newswire, 2/7/08, “M&A Volume in the Transportation & Logistics Industry reaches 20-year high,
According to PricewaterhouseCoopers” pg lexis //EM
Chemical Compounds, PricewaterhouseCoopers quarterly report on the state of transactions in the global chemicals
industry, highlighted a rise in deal value, which more than doubled from $53 billion in 2006 to $109 billion in 2007. This
increase was driven by a greater number of deals with transaction values over $1 billion, as well as a slight rise in deal
volume which reached 819 deals in 2007. The size of these large deals also increased significantly in 2007 with three deals
that were greater than $10 billion and three that were greater than $5 billion (but less than $10 billion), compared to
2006 when only one deal was greater than $10 billion.
259
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Ed Zwim, staff writer, 6/11/07, ICIS chemical business America, “Survival of the Fittest” pg lexis //EM
MERGER AND acquisition (M&A) activity is making its impact on the North American chemical industry's distribution
network. The previously fragmented market by which companies distribute the chemicals needed to run the US
economy may soon give way to a more streamlined set of entities, as smaller distributors are swallowed up by larger
ones. In the past 10 years, the number of national distributors has decreased from six or seven to three -
Univar/CHEMCENTRAL, Ashland and Brenntag, says Chris Jahn, president and CEO of the National Association of Chemical
Distributors (NACD), an industry group that he says accounts for 80-90% of industry revenues and has lost 48 members over
the past 14 years, due to M&A activity alone. Not surprisingly, large and small companies involved in distribution are
putting their best feet forward to operate in this changed environment. The larger ones tout the synergistic
opportunities involved in M&A, while small and medium-sized enterprises say they welcome the competition.
EPA, 4/17/07, Environmental Protection Agency Documents and Publications, “Chemical Industry Expands
Work with EPA in Solving Environmental Problems” pg lexis //EM
The chemical industry is an essential contributor to the U.S. economy, with about $555 billion in annual revenues. There
are approximately 13,500 chemical manufacturing facilities in the United States, owned by more than 9,000 companies. The
sector is one of the nation's largest exporters, accounting for 10 cents of every U.S. export dollar.
260
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Air power is key to solve war, asteroid collisions, and natural disasters – the impact is extinction.
Col. John A Warden III USAF (ret.) President of Venturist Inc., 1997, Airpower Confronts an Unstable World, Ed.
Hallion, pp 239-240
Earlier in this chapter, we discussed reaction to natural disasters by air operations. Left unaddressed, however, was the
possibility of using air power to prevent them. We normally think of natural disasters as being terrestrial in origin and
including earthquakes, volcanoes and wind storms. Our current knowledge of the earthquake suggests we are powerless to
prevent them. The same may be true of volcanoes although it may be worth a little thought as to whether it might be possible
to relieve volcanic pressures pre-emptively with some kind of high - energy -. penetrating weapon. Likewise, there may be
something which can be done about tornadoes and hurricanes. Without question, however, air forces have the potential
ability, and arguably the responsibility. to prevent extra-terrestrial disasters. The probability that the Earth will be hit
by an errant asteroid or comet is close to one; indeed, we recently saw several such bodies hit Jupiter and impose on the
Jovian planet damage which on Earth might have destroyed most life. Air forces unequivocally accept responsibility
for intercepting airborne attackers; why should they not also be charged with protecting us from extraterrestrial
projectiles? The cost, if spread among the world's air forces, would be relatively low and would take advantage of multiple
talents and observation positions. Although the world in front of us looks quite peaceful in comparison to the millennia of
strife we have suffered, the opportunities for air power are boundless. From ensuring a long period of stability to dealing
with the inevitable localised disturbances, air power has the potential to be the most important, and importantly the least
expensive, tool available. For it to be, however, airmen must become imaginative and innovative. They must rethink their
business and realise that it is not flying aircraft but rather injecting energy into the heart of target systems from a conceptual
high ground. Airmen must realise that their only purpose is not to fly and fight-for that is nothing more than a poor excuse for
an industrial age input measure-but rather is to affect major change rapidly in a target system. They must realise that the
manned aircraft is only a tool that must be discarded when it is no longer the best tool available. And airmen must be willing
to engage in open, honest, brutal debate with the advocates of still older military tools who are fighting desperate
battles to keep institutions alive. The opportunities for air power are immense-as-are the challenges. If we accept the
challenges and overcome them, we will make a maior contribution to world peace and stability. If we refuse to accept the
challenges and continue to live in a long-gone world of flying scarves, our relevance will fade rapidly, and with it our best
hope for the future
Evan R. Seamone, Iowa Law Review, 2002, “When Wishing on a Star Just Won’t Do It: The Legal Basis for
International cooperation in the Mitigation of Asteroid Impacts and Similar Transboundary Disasters,” March,
pg lexis //dch
Even though collisions with space bodies could potentially extinguish all life on Earth, scientists were slow to appreciate
the significance of the threat. Thousands of objects from space descend to our planet's terra firma each year. n44 Space
bodies typically disintegrate before entering the Earth's atmosphere, which is protected by a "gaseous shroud" that annually
withstands several interplanetary strikes. n45 But some projectiles can be so big and move so fast that the atmosphere
cannot absorb their force, at which point damage occurs based on the size and velocity of the impacting object. n46 The
destruction of the dinosaurs demonstrates the seriousness of asteroid or comet collision, as opposed to commonplace
disasters. n47 Even if [*1102] an impact would not cause the end of life, the resulting damage would be unlike any disaster
the modern international community has seen. A serious collision could lead to the eventual "poisoning of the
atmosphere through the production of various oxides of nitrogen ... [and to] global fires, pyrotoxin production, giant
tsunamis, earthquakes, severe greenhouse warming and acidic rain." n48 Even smaller objects (less than 2/3-mile or one
kilometer in diameter) could cause damage equivalent to a nuclear detonation. n49
261
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Col. John A Warden III USAF (ret.) President of Venturist Inc., 1997, Airpower Confronts an Unstable World, Ed.
Hallion, pp 239-240
As the 20th Century draws to a close, air power dominates warfare. Those who have air power overwhelm those who
don't; those who don't have it spend their energies trying to get it, thwart it or escape it. It is control of the high ground
writ large-but unlike the old days when high ground was largely an accident of the situation, in the new world, air
power allows the user to move the high ground to wherever it is needed. Air power, when measured in terms of output
per dollar or life invested, is the cheapest, most effective method of fighting in human history and the advent of
precision makes it even cheaper.
Nuclear War
Zalmay Khalilzad, RAND analyst, Spring 1995, “Losing the Moment,” WASHINGTON QUARTERLY, pg lexis
Under the third option, the United States would seek to retain global leadership and to preclude the rise of a global rival or a
return to multipolarity for the indefinite future. On balance, this is the best long-term guiding principle and vision. Such a
vision is desirable not as an end in itself, but because a world in which the United States exercises leadership would have
tremendous advantages. First, the global environment would be more open and more receptive to American values --
democracy, free markets, and the rule of law. Second, such a world would have a better chance of dealing cooperatively with
the world's major problems, such as nuclear proliferation, threats of regional hegemony by renegade states, and low-level
conflicts. Finally, U.S. leadership would help preclude the rise of another hostile global rival, enabling the United States
and the world to avoid another global cold or hot war and all the attendant dangers, including a global nuclear exchange.
U.S. leadership would therefore be more conducive to global stability than a bipolar or a multipolar balance of power system.
262
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Impacts – Disease
Disease Spread Risks Extinction
John D. Steinbruner, Senior Fellow Brookings Institute, Winter 98, “Biological Weapons: A Plague Upon All
Houses,” FOREIGN POLICY n. 109, pp. 85-96, ASP.
It is a considerable comfort and undoubtedly a key to our survival that, so far, the main lines of defense against this threat have
not depended on explicit policies or organized efforts. In the long course of evolution, the human body has developed physical
barriers and a biochemical immune system whose sophistication and effectiveness exceed anything we could design or as yet
even fully understand. But evolution is a sword that cuts both ways: New diseases emerge, while old diseases mutate and adapt.
Throughout history, there have been epidemics during which human immunity has broken down on an epic scale. An infectious
agent believed to have been the plague bacterium killed an estimated 20 million people over a four-year period in the
fourteenth century, including nearly one-quarter of Western Europe's population at the time. Since its recognized appearance in
1981, some 20 variations of the HIV virus have infected an estimated 29.4 million worldwide, with 1.5 million people currently
dying of AIDS each year. Malaria, tuberculosis, and cholera - once thought to be under control - are now making a comeback.
As we enter the twenty-first century, changing conditions have enhanced the potential for widespread contagion. The
rapid growth rate of the total world population, the unprecedented freedom of movement across international borders,
and scientific advances that expand the capability for the deliberate manipulation of pathogens are all cause for worry
that the problem might be greater in the future than it has ever been in the past. The threat of infectious pathogens is
not just an issue of public health, but a fundamental security problem for the species as a whole.
263
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
William Calvin, University of Washington, Jan 1998, “The Great Climate Flip-Flop,” ATLANTIC MONTHLY
v. 281 n. 1, pp. 47-64.)
The population-crash scenario is surely the most appalling. Plummeting crop yields would cause some powerful countries
to try to take over their neighbors or distant lands -- if only because their armies, unpaid and lacking food, would go
marauding, both at home and across the borders. The better-organized countries would attempt to use their armies, before
they fell apart entirely, to take over countries with significant remaining resources, driving out or starving their
inhabitants if not using modern weapons to accomplish the same end: eliminating competitors for the remaining food. This
would be a worldwide problem -- and could lead to a Third World War -- but Europe's vulnerability is particularly easy to
analyze. The last abrupt cooling, the Younger Dryas, drastically altered Europe's climate as far east as Ukraine. Present-day
Europe has more than 650 million people. It has excellent soils, and largely grows its own food. It could no longer do so if it
lost the extra warming from the North Atlantic.
264
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Impacts – Satellites
Center for Security Policy, 1-23-98, “Summary of 'The Need For American Space Dominance',” Press Release
Number 98-P 16at, http://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/index.jsp?section=papers&code=98-P_16at
General Edward Meyer: "I [would like to] take you through basically what the warp and woof of the Army is and what their
needs are as far as it relates to space....The ability to be able to have position locating systems and so on that rely upon
space to provide [the common soldier] with data and information is essential if we are going to have smaller armed
forces who are able...to operate over larger areas more effectively. "When we know exactly where we are and exactly where
the targets are, then the requirement for ammunition goes down dramatically because you are able to fire one or two
rounds, where before you had to fire six or eight rounds in order to fire and be able to attack targets, and this is even with
non-'smart' weaponry. "In the special operations area...they have to have the ability...to, one, not only [know] what is going on
where they are, but they also have to be able to communicate with a whole lot of joint entities that are flying around in
the skies, and that does not permit you to run fiber optics out to them or long-range cable entities. That means that we have
to be able to deal like many of the developing countries are today with cellular phone-type data, where the data and
information is fed to them from the skies. "For the medical sergeant and the medical NCO, why is he important? Because a
soldier is laying out there and because a doctor can talk to him and tell him how to help that young soldier and keep him alive.
So that is an important adjunct that we have, and require space assets. "So I argue that of all the services...space will have the
biggest impact upon the Army....Space is going to impact on the organizations of the future, and it is going to impact upon the
research and development of the future. We will have very different types of armed forces, ones -- or armies -- which are less
capable in my judgment, in the long run, which are heavier, more difficult to project than if we have access to space." Admiral
Wesley McDonald: "For those people who are still serving in the military and particularly in the Navy, space has grown to be
a very, very important aspect of what they do. I can't impress you enough as to how dependent on use of space the Navy is. As
Shy used in some of his examples, it is very important for the Army individual, unit, or group, or whatever we are looking at, to
know where they are. That is absolutely true for the Navy. "Even though the ocean is very broad, all around the world,
you really can't hide unless you have control of what is up there [in space] at times when you really want to assure
yourself you can hide. "If we lose the ability to control what is in space -- whether it be satellites, whether it be
spacecraft, whether it be other types of intelligence-seeking things [we are in trouble]. And I want to tell you, without
intelligence, nobody knows where they are going or what they are going to do and what they are going to see." General
"Mike" Loh: "When I look back and look at all of those forces and people that are required to conduct our combat military
missions, Air Force as well as Army, Navy, Marine Corps, how very dependent they have become, just in the past few years,
how very dependent they have all become on space assets. It is almost frightening when you then turn that around and look at
how little we have allowed for the protection and the space superiority of those assets. "Let me cover five functions for which
today we are almost totally dependent on space assets. The first is communications....If the DSCS satellites or the MILSTAR
satellites went out of commission, even some of them, we'd be devastated. We depend on space communications to knit
together a theater battle management system, a command-and-control system that all of the services will use. It is dependent on
space. We have cut the Gordian Knot. There is no more belt-and- suspenders. "The warning function is taking on more and
more missions. It used to be the mission of detecting ballistic missile attack against the United States....The warning function
that we have relied on for theater applications, on other means, is now being done to a very large extent through space assets.
"The next two, we have just absolutely become totally dependent on, and that is navigation and weapons delivery....We are
dependent on navigation, on knowing where we are and where everything is on the Global Positioning Satellite (GPS) system.
[And] we have now become dependent on that system for weapons delivery. Every system that I am aware of that is in
development by the services today for precision weapons delivery is based on GPS.
265
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Impacts – Hegemony
Nuclear War
Zalmay Khalilzad, RAND analyst, Spring 1995, “Losing the Moment,” WASHINGTON QUARTERLY, pg lexis
Under the third option, the United States would seek to retain global leadership and to preclude the rise of a global rival or a
return to multipolarity for the indefinite future. On balance, this is the best long-term guiding principle and vision. Such a
vision is desirable not as an end in itself, but because a world in which the United States exercises leadership would have
tremendous advantages. First, the global environment would be more open and more receptive to American values --
democracy, free markets, and the rule of law. Second, such a world would have a better chance of dealing cooperatively with
the world's major problems, such as nuclear proliferation, threats of regional hegemony by renegade states, and low-level
conflicts. Finally, U.S. leadership would help preclude the rise of another hostile global rival, enabling the United States
and the world to avoid another global cold or hot war and all the attendant dangers, including a global nuclear exchange.
U.S. leadership would therefore be more conducive to global stability than a bipolar or a multipolar balance of power system.
266
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Impacts – Terrorism
Terrorism ensures extinction
More specifically, present-day terrorists have introduced into contemporary life a new scale of terror violence in terms of
both threats and responses that has made clear that we have entered into an Age of Terrorism with all of its serious
implications to national, regional, and global security concerns. n25 Perhaps the most significant dangers that evolve
from modern day terrorism are those relating to the safety, welfare, and rights of ordinary people; the stability of
the state system; the health of economic [*67] development; the expansion of democracy; and possibly the survival
of civilization itself.
267
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Impacts – Nanotech
Halting nanotech innovation causes disease spread, famine, economic crises, and nuke wars
Treder, Executive Director of the non-profit Center for Responsible Nanotechnology. Future Brief, 06, “From
Heaven to Doomsday: Seven Future Scenarios,” http://ieet.org/index.php/IEET/articles/treder20060218/
In this scenario, reactionary critics of scientific progress, from supporters of "creationism" to radical environmental
protection groups, and from neo-Luddites to educated technophobes (such as Francis Fukuyama and Leon Kass), are
successful in essentially halting development. The result is a monumental increase in world misery. Research scientists,
technology entrepreneurs, open-minded academics and political progressives are persecuted and stymied in most
countries, including the U.S.; they are systematically silenced, jailed, or exterminated in other places. Advancements
in artificial intelligence, genetic engineering, space exploration, robotics, and nanotechnology come to a halt.
Moore’s Law is finally overturned. Famine, pestilence, disease, and starvation at levels never seen before devastate
much of the world. As millions suffer horrible wasting deaths, billions more are born into inescapable poverty and squalor.
Chronic worldwide economic crises result in massive political instability that leads to civil wars, regional wars, and
ultimately nuclear wars. At the close of the 21st century, world conditions have returned to a state more like the 19th
century. It is the second Dark Ages.
268
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Impacts – Nanotech
NANOTECH LEADS TO UTOPIA AND TURNS ALL YOUR IMPACTS
269
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Impacts – Nanotech
Turns case: nanotech innovation corporations to decouple from the environment, enabling non-
ecologically destructive production
Martin W. Lewis, Assistant professor in the Department of Geography and Regional Science George
Washington University, 1992, Green Delusions: An Environmentalist Critique of Radical Environmentalism,
Durham: Duke University Press, 16-7//uwyo-ajl
The Promethean perspective adopted here advocates a form of environmental protection that green extremists would consider
utterly heretical. Where they seek to reconnect humanity with nature, I counter that human society should strive to separate
itself as much as possible from the natural world, a notion that has aptly been labeled "decoupling" by the geographer
Simmons (1989:3841. To advocate decoupling is to reject both the instrumentalist claim-that nature should be used
merely for human ends-and the green counterargument-that humanity is, or should be, just another species in nature.
Decoupling processes have already averted ecological devastation many times. European forests, for example, avoided
destruction when early modern smelters substituted coal for charcoal (see Perlin 1989).
This process should continue as composites replace steel and as coal begins to yield to solar power-with nature breathing easier
everywhere as a result. But one must wonder whether self-proclaimed deep ecologists affirming their communion with nature
through shamanistic rituals will supply the world with solar technologies. I suspect rather that such delivery will come, if at
all, from high-tech corporations-from firms operating in a social, economic, and technical milieu almost wholly removed
from the intricate webs of the natural world.
If we are lucky, the commercialization of photovoltaic solar energy will come in good part from struggling American start-ups
like Chronar.
It now seems far more likely, however, that this technology will be dominated by such vast industrial concerns as Hitachi,
Sanyo, and Fujitsu (The Economist, 19-25 May 1990). The engineers, investors, and managers of a company like Chronar
should be hailed and supported as
Enivronmentla heroes, not denounced as technocratic and capitalist eco-villains. We will be better able to appreciate the vital
roles that such companies plaY if we accept that ecological salvation will come through distancing ourselves from, rather
than reimmersing ourselves in, the natural world.
To move from heresy to blasphemy, I would also suggest that as toxic waste decomposition technologies and recycling
techniques are perfected, the use of synthetic materials will entail far less environmental destruction than will the
continued production of natural products like paper, wood, and cotton. The future may yet be in plastics. Let us hope that
companies like Du Pont can create artificial fibers sophisticated enough that we no longer need to deplete the earth's
aquifers, clear its tropical forests, drain its wetlands, and pour massive quantities of biocides on all of these
environments in order to grow the cotton that affluent American consumers consider so wonderfully "natural." The greatest
hope for virtually complete decoupling may lie in the socalled nanotechnology revolution (Drexler 1986; Drexler and Peterson
1991). If its proponents are correct, the nano techniques of molecular assembly will allow us to build superior goods using
only a small fraction of the energy and materials now required. Indeed, Drexler goes so far as to argue that by mining
surplus atmospheric carbon dioxide we will be able to provide most of the raw materials needed for the next economy.
Moreover, not only would a nanotech economy spare the natural world of any noxious pollutants, but it would also allow a
truly massive return of land to natural communities. Although the layperson may regard nanotechnology as utter fantasy, it
is based on firm scientific reasoning, and it has been taken seriously by at least one prominent environmental phi'losopher
(Milbrath 1989).
270
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Impacts – Agriculture
Ag Key To Econ
Peter Chalk, analyst for RAND corporation, October 2001, “Terrorism Infrastructure Protection and the U.S.
Food and Agriculture Sector, RAND CONGRESSIONAL TESTIMONY, npg.
Agriculture and the general food industry remain absolutely critical to the social, economic and, arguably, political
stability of the US, indirectly constituting roughly two percent of the country’s overall domestic gross domestic product
(GDP). One in eight people work in some component of agriculture – more if food production is included – making the
industry one of the US’ largest employers.
1http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:ZrCVxe3WCZ4J:www.rand.org/publications/CT/CT184/CT184.pdf
+%22terrorism,+infrastructure+protection%22+AND+RAND+AND+Chalk&hl=en - 5Cattle and dairy
farmers alone earn between US$50 and US$54 billion a year through meat and milk sales, while roughly US$50 billion is
raised every year through agricultural exports. The share of produce sold overseas is more Comments made by Noreen
Hynes during the International Conference on Emerging Infectious Diseases (ICIED), Atlanta, Georgia, July 16-19 2000. than
double that of other US industries, which gives agriculture major importance in terms of the American balance of
trade.2These figures represent only a fraction of the total value of agriculture to the country, as they do not take into
account allied services and industries such as suppliers, transporters, distributors and restaurant chains.
3http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:ZrCVxe3WCZ4J:www.rand.org/publications/CT/CT184/CT184.pdf
+%22terrorism,+infrastructure+protection%22+AND+RAND+AND+Chalk&hl=en - 6The down stream
effect of any deliberate act of sabotage/destruction to this highly valuable industry would be enormous, creating a tidal wave
effect that would be felt by all these sectors, impacting, ultimately, on the ordinary citizen him/herself.
271
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Impacts – Manufacturing
Increasing natural gas prices will collapse the entire US manufacturing industry
Joseph Chang, staff writer, 3/19/07, ICIS Chemical Business, “Living in a Green World” pg lexis //EM
California, led by governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, has already passed legislation mandating emissions caps on industry for
the first time in history. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) is asking for a federal bill on emissions caps by July. "This is a
big concern, whether it's summary execution at the federal level or death by duck bites at the state level," says Drevna. "I can't
say the states are serious when they're considering this - they may just be trying to prod the federal government into taking
some action with their particular proposal. It's one thing for California to set up goals, but putting those goals into actual
legislative language and regulatory approaches will prove to be much more daunting." Congress must be very careful not to
create winners and losers in this debate, something easily achieved with emissions cap and trading proposals, warns NPRA.
"Congress has a hard time passing legislation that doesn't create winners and losers, but this one is so critical that every nuance
has to be carefully dissected to make sure there's a full understanding as to what the ultimate impacts are - not only on industry-
specific sectors such as refining and petrochemicals, but also on the overall economy," says Drevna. Emissions caps would
cause natural gas prices to rise, hurting the petrochemical industry, according to NPRA. Utilities, the leading consumer of
natural gas, would be further incentivised to use clean burning natural gas rather than coal. "Any time you force fuel switching
by any regulation, the impact has been less supply and higher price," Drevna points out. "If you start forcing the obvious choice
for those in the system to use more natural gas, prices will rise and there will be demand destruction within certain sectors.
Unfortunately, one of those sectors will be the domestic petrochemical industry. That's why we're saying: Don't create
winners and losers! Be careful how you do this cap and trade." While utilities will be able to easily pass along higher
natural gas prices to consumers through rate increases, the petrochemical industry has no such luxury, NPRA adds. The
threat to the US petrochemical industry and further downstream to the overall manufacturing sector, is palpable.
However, this has received little attention among policy makers. "One of the things we are trying to get policymakers and
opinion leaders to focus on is the fact that if you don't produce the petrochemicals domestically, and if you're not
producing the plastic pellets here in the US, there is absolutely no reason to make the products that are derived from
those pellets here," Drevna points out. "I don't think anyone has really focused on that. It's the quintessential ripple effect.
We're looking at the destruction of the US manufacturing sector." Regardless, it appears there will be significant
movement on emissions caps in the 110th Congress. "Anyone intellectually honest about the situation would have to admit that
we are fast approaching the day that some sort of legislation will be enacted," says Drevna.
272
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Impacts – Steel
Rep. Fred Upton, R-Mich, 5/22/08, CQ transcripts “Republican Members of the House of Representatives Hold
a News Conference on Legislative Energy Proposals” pg lexis //EM
Today, as we look at new nuclear plant construction, when it occurs -- and there are a couple of applications that are
pending before the NRC -- 85 percent of the components are going to come from overseas, not here.
So we want to send the word to our steelworkers, our pipefitters, our steamfitters, whether they be in Pittsburgh or Gary,
Indiana, and other places that were always mighty in terms of the steel industry that in fact that green light's going to be
back on and we're going to get back to business with American made engineers and producers that can in fact expand
our nuclear capability.
273
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Turns Case
Turn: Chemical industry key to efficient cars and all forms of renewable energy that an RPS would rely
on
Senator James Inhofe, expert on national security issues and chairman of Environmental public works
committee, 4/29/08, Congressional Documents and Publications, “Inhofe Hearing Statement on EPA Toxic
Chemicals Policies” pg lexis //EM
But it is about more than money. Chemicals are the essential building blocks of products that safely and effectively prevent,
treat, and cure disease; ensure the safest and most abundant food supply in the world; purify our drinking water and put out
fires. They are the foundation for life-saving medical devices, such as sutures, internal tubing, and scalpels. Innovations in
chemistry have made planes, fighter jets, and space shuttles safer and more secure. Plastics are used to make lighter, yet
stronger, cars, and silica is an ingredient in low-rolling resistance tires, all of which increases automobile fuel efficiency.
Alternative sources of energy, on which cap-and-trade proponents are relying, are dependent on chemicals. Wind power
blades contain polyester and resin additives, and solar power relies on silicon-based materials. Finally, chemicals keep
our children and our men and women in uniform safe by increasing the effectiveness of child safety seats, bicycle helmets, and
Kevlar vests. I could go on and on.
274
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
INDUSTRIES AFF
275
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
2AC – Industries
1. Forecasts for future increases in natural gas prices should be doubled or tripled
Global Power Report, 5/17/07, “Congress is under estimating carbon costs by low balling gas forecast, say consultants, pg
lexis //EM
Energy-intensive industries said this week that Congress is under estimating the cost of a nationwide carbon cap-and-trade
program because government forecasts have unrealistic assumptions for future natural gas prices. Current forecasts by
the Energy Information Administration and others that long-term gas prices will stabilize at roughly $4.50/MMBtu
should assume prices two or three times that figure for two reasons, officials with Industrial Energy Consumers of
America told reporters at a briefing. IECA Executive Director Paul Cicio and Andy Weismann, a consultant to the trade
group, said most forecasts today under estimate how quickly additional natural gas supplies can be expected from the
proposed Alaska natural gas pipeline and new liquefied natural gas terminals. Cicio made his comments as IECA and
other trade groups are ramping up a lobbying campaign aimed at getting Congress to lift government barriers to more LNG
terminals and expanded domestic gas drilling, he said. Weismann said he does not see the natural gas pipeline project,
which would deliver 5 Bcf of natural gas into the Lower-48 states each day, coming online before 2015. That is five years
or more beyond what the EIA projects. If there are delays in permitting or funding the project, "that's a 5 Bcf/day hole in US
supply, and I don't know how you fill that easily," Weismann said. He also said the projected $25 billion capital cost of the
projects could actually be as high as $40 billion because the cost of raw materials such as concrete and steel have risen
substantially in light of the construction boom in China and India. "One could easily argue that natural gas price
forecasts should be two to three times as high as they are now," Weismann said. Natural gas prices will continue to rise
this winter, multiple warrants CNN, 7/3/08, “Avista warns of continued natural gas price hikes”, CNN money
http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/apwire/919e35e0554e2f663d1af503d11a7862.htm#TOP //EM NEW YORK
(Associated Press) - Normally, natural gas prices are low in the summer months and utilities stock up for sale in the
winter. This year, though, a spike in energy prices is also hitting natural gas, which likely means higher prices for
consumers this winter, Avista Corp. warned Wednesday. Kevin Christie, Avista's director of gas supply, said prices rose
from an average of $7.39 per dekatherm in June 2007 to $12.81 per dekatherm last month, a 73 percent increase. A
typical home in the utility's service areas in Eastern Washington, northern Idaho and Oregon uses about seven dekatherms a
month. "The combination of an unusually long winter and cold spring created higher demand for natural gas, which
depleted storage reserves across the country," Christie said in a release. High prices for crude oil, plus lower natural gas
imports into the United States, are also pushing prices up, Christie said. The lack of lower spring and summer prices
means natural gas rates for customers will likely increase when Avista files its annual "purchase gas cost adjustments"
in September, although the amount of the increase remains undetermined, Christie said.
276
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
2AC – Industries
2. Despite natural gas price drop, the commodity’s boom isn’t over yet. This is only a short term
correction
Stevenson Jacobs, AP Business Writer, 7/17/08, Associated Press Financial Wire, “Commodities Drop for 3rd
day as Oil Keeps Falling” pg lexis //EM
Commodities turned lower for a third day Thursday, as steep drops in crude oil and natural gas prices fed beliefs that high
energy costs are curbing Americans' fuel consumption and at least temporarily cooling the commodities boom. Crude oil
had another day of sharp losses, falling more than $5 a barrel after a big sell-off of natural gas. Oil also fell more than $10 in
the previous two sessions. The drop in energy helped send soybeans, silver, corn and other commodities sharply lower. "We're
seeing some worries about demand destruction in oil, so I think that's creating some fear among investors and leading them to
sell," said Tom Pawlicki, commodities analyst with MF Global Research in Chicago. Worries about the health of the American
economy has weighed heavily on commodities this week. Investors are concerned that rising inflation and weak economic
growth will slow consumer spending and curb demand for raw materials in the U.S. and overseas. Despite the sharp drop in
futures prices in recent days, few analysts predict an end to the white-hot commodities boom of the last year. Pawlicki
called this week's sell-off a "short-term correction" and predicted prices would turn higher in coming days and months
as investors who have been bearish on stocks shift funds back into commodities. "I think it's too early to call a top to
this market," Pawlicki said. The drop in crude prices weighed on agriculture futures Thursday, with corn, wheat and soybeans
all dropping sharply. Also pressuring prices was more favorable growing weather in the Midwest and a vote by Argentina's
Senate to block a hotly disputed grains-export tax that had prompted weeks of farming strikes and food shortages. Soybeans for
November delivery fell 50.5 cents to $14.975 a bushel on the Chicago Board of Trade, after earlier falling to $14.90 a bushel.
Corn for December delivery lost 28.75 cents to $6.485 a bushel, while September wheat dropped 24.5 cents to $8.095 a bushel.
In energy markets, crude oil fell sharply Thursday, sent lower following the biggest one-day drop in natural gas prices in nearly
a year. Light, sweet crude for August delivery fell $5.31 to settle at $129.29 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange.
Prices have fallen about $15 in the past three days. Natural gas futures for August delivery fell as much as 8.2 percent in
the day, the biggest one-day drop in nearly a year. Natural gas fell 13.8 percent on Aug. 20, 2007, according to Nathan Golz,
researcher at Wachovia Securities in St. Louis.
M2 Equity Bytes, 6/20/08, “Rentech and UOP enter into an alliance to deploy clean fuels and chemical
technologies” pg lexis //EM
Rentech Inc(AMEX:RTK), a provider of clean energy solutions, announced on Thursday (19 June) that the company has
entered into a non-exclusive agreement with UOP LLC, a Honeywell (NYSE:HON) company, for the deployment of clean
fuels and chemical technologies. Under the alliance, both the companies will use their respective technologies for the
commercial production of synthetic fuels, specialty waxes and chemicals. The companies said that the agreement aligns
Rentech's proprietary process to convert synthesis gas from biomass and fossil resources into hydrocarbons with UOP's
hydrocracking and hydrotreating technologies that process and upgrade hydrocarbons into ultra-clean synthetic fuels, specialty
waxes and chemicals. Rentech and UOP expect to increase their market reach and jointly offer proven technologies that
can produce ultra-clean synthetic fuels, specialty waxes and chemicals that are cleaner than traditional petroleum-
derived fuels and chemicals.
277
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
2AC – Industries
4. Breakthrough in solar power ensures renewable supply for Chemical industry
Business Wire, 7/7/08, “Record-High Petroleum Prices a Boon to BioSolar; Company’s Cost-Saving Bio-Based
Materials for Photovoltaic Solar Modules Poised to Decrease Industry’s oil dependence”
A recent article in PlasticsNews underscores how manufacturers are impacted by price increases of commodity
chemicals, as well as "almost unprecedented" run-ups in energy and raw materials costs. The June 22, 2008 article notes
that companies are impacted not only by rising raw materials costs, but the associated electricity and transportation costs as
well. Kevin Swift, chief economist at the American Chemistry Council, says, "Each $1 increase in the price of a barrel of crude
oil costs the chemical industry $660 million annually ...For a $1 increase in 1 million BTUs of natural gas, it's $3.3 billion
in new costs.""The market for solar power is already in explosive growth mode, and photovoltaic technology has
progressed markedly in recent years with advances making the cells more efficient, lighter and less expensive. But
BioSolar is singularly positioned to lead the development of truly sustainable and cost-effective solar technology as the
first company to introduce a new dimension of cost reduction by replacing petroleum-based plastic solar cell module
components with durable non-food, bio-based materials," said Lee. BioSolar is in the process of transitioning into full-
scale production of its BioBacksheet(TM) in a 60,000-square-foot state-of-the-art facility operated by its contract
manufacturing partner, Rowland Technologies, Inc. By incorporating Rowland Technologies' world-class manufacturing
capabilities with BioSolar's unique material engineering, BioSolar is producing an environmentally-friendly product
with characteristics that exceed the thermal index requirements of solar module manufacturers. "We expect this
breakthrough product to be rapidly accepted as the standard for the backsheet component of both traditional and
certain thin-film photovoltaic modules," said Lee.
Xinhua News Service, 7/15/08, World News Economic, “Bernanke says U.S. Economy continues to Face
Numerous Difficulties” pg lexis //EM
The U.S. economy continues to face "numerous difficulties," include persistent strains in financial markets, declining
house prices and rising prices of oil and food, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said on Tuesday. "The U.S.
economy and financial system have confronted some significant challenges thus far in 2008," said Bernanke in a written
testimony to the Senate Banking Committee. "The effects of the housing contraction and of the financial headwinds on
spending and economic activity have been compounded by rapid increases in the prices of energy and other
commodities, which have sapped household purchasing power even as they have boosted inflation," he said.
278
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
RANDOMNESS
279
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Why was their concern for natural gas so high? It stemmed from the simple fact that
President Bush and Vice President Cheney were both staggered to watch a drilling
boom for natural gas occur as gas prices spiraled from $3 to over $10 per mcf and to
then see that this unprecedented drilling boom merely kept the daily supply of natural
gas flat. Despite the fact that gas well completions grew from 10,000 wells completed in
1999 to over 22,000 wells completed in 2001, daily supply did not grow. It stayed as flat
as it had been for the previous seven years.
280
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Saud Mohammad Al-Fattah, PhD degree from Texas A&M University, Texas & Reservoir Management & Well
Testing Systems Group at Saudi Aramco, 4-27-2006, Petroleum Management and Economics. “Time Series
Modeling for U.S. Natural Gas Forecasting,” [Google Scholar].
<<http://petroleumjournalsonline.com/journals/index.php/economics/article/view/20>>
Faced with diminishing supplies of domestic crude oil and increased demand for energy, the US has come to rely on imported crude
and domestic supplies of natural gas. During the last decade US natural gas production has risen about 10%, but it still does not
succeed to meet demand. This supply shortage has resulted in significant increases in natural gas prices. We believe that developing a
reliable method to forecast US natural gas production rates and reserves will benefit gas producers, consumers and policy makers.
This paper presents one methodology for developing forecasting models for predicting U.S. natural gas production, proved reserves,
and annual depletion to year 2025 using a stochastic (time series) modeling approach. The methodology is not mechanistic. A
mechanistic model would examine individual geologic settings, exploration success, the physics of gas production, and the rate of
exploitation for provinces, basins, and reservoirs. However, to do so would result in an extraordinarily massive model that would be
difficult, if not impossible, to develop and use. Instead we used a simpler approach which takes advantage of established trends in
easily obtained published data.
281
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
World energy demand is rising. Without major energy policy changes, the IEA World Energy Outlook 2007 predicts well over
a 50% higher global energy demand by 2030. This demand growth will be accelerated by the fast growing economies of China
and India and other emerging economies. Based on existing energy policies, China and India will account for 45 % of this energy
demand increase.
Such global growth in energy demand can come from two sources:
• The world population will increase on average by 1% per year over the next 22 years. This adds a city larger than Amsterdam every
week to the world’s population. As OECD countries now use over three times more energy per capita than the rest of the world, and
because population will mainly grow outside the OECD countries, it can be roughly estimated that a third of the projected increase in
world energy demand by 2030 will be caused by global population growth.
• Despite the trend towards a decoupling of energy demand from GDP growth, GDP remains the main driver for this increase
in global energy demand. The legitimate aspiration of the population in the emerging markets –as it is in the OECD countries– is
aimed at maximising living standards. By 2030, increased living standards are expected to contribute two-thirds of the increase in total
energy demand.
Without substantial changes in energy policies, the forecasted world energy demand by 2030 can only be covered with
increased hydrocarbon use to avoid major future imbalances. Under these conditions, the switch to low carbon energy systems
to combat climate change represents a potentially conflicting objective with that of fulfilling the energy needs of a more
prosperous and growing world population. IEA warns that, without changes in the energy policies of the consuming regions,
by 2015 a supply crunch might be expected.
282
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
René Snijder, Energy consultant, lecturer at the Energy Delta Institute in The Netherlands, member of the gas group of the
Clingendael Institute and member of IGU committee B (Strategy and Regulation), with over 30 years experience in the natural gas
industry, working for the NV Nederlandse
Gasunie and two years for Shell, 3/11/2008 “The Future of Gas and the Role of LNG: Economic and Geopolitical Implications,” Real
Instituto Elcano,
http://209.85.215.104/search?q=cache:L5jbxi17HZQJ:www.realinstitutoelcano.org/wps/wcm/connect/resources/file/eb876d0ad931a07
/WP14-
2008_Snijder_Gas_LNG_Economic_Geopolitical_Implications.pdf%3FMOD%3DAJPERES%26attachment%3Dtrue+Indonesia+LN
G+economy&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=45&gl=us&client=firefox-a
But the key question is: will there be enough new liquefaction capacity coming down the pipeline to justify all these new
plants? The answer is, for the time being at least, no. The major exporting region is the Middle East. Some additional developments
can be observed with the booming building efforts taking place in Qatar. However, Qatar is no longer taking on new commitments
and, being currently congested with present LNG projects and other activities, has even announced a cooling off period,.
Simply put, no spare LNG production capacity is currently available.
There is also a global shortage of experienced workforce and engineering capacity. The prices of nickel and other input materials
have been rising steeply, increasing the break-even cost of LNG shipped gas, making pipelined gas more competitive at distances even
beyond 3,000 km. Nigeria, Yemen, Oman, Iran, Trinidad and Tobago, Indonesia, Malaysia, Algeria, Russia, Norway and Australia are
the principal future producers of LNG, but all have some sort of reservations, or even real constraints, standing in the way of
their developing, in the short term, the considerably larger quantities of LNG necessary to meet all of the potential demand of
wholesalers seeking alternative supplies.
283
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
René Snijder, Energy consultant, lecturer at the Energy Delta Institute in The Netherlands, member of the gas group of the
Clingendael Institute and member of IGU committee B (Strategy and Regulation), with over 30 years experience in the natural gas
industry, working for the NV Nederlandse
Gasunie and two years for Shell, 3/11/2008 “The Future of Gas and the Role of LNG: Economic and Geopolitical Implications,” Real
Instituto Elcano,
http://209.85.215.104/search?q=cache:L5jbxi17HZQJ:www.realinstitutoelcano.org/wps/wcm/connect/resources/file/eb876d0ad931a07
/WP14-
2008_Snijder_Gas_LNG_Economic_Geopolitical_Implications.pdf%3FMOD%3DAJPERES%26attachment%3Dtrue+Indonesia+LN
G+economy&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=45&gl=us&client=firefox-a
On the other hand, some producing countries are questioning what they call the ‘security of demand’. How certain will the
demand be in consumer markets? Will it be strong enough to be able to make reasonable decisions on the levels of long-term
natural gas investments? This perspective is heard, in particular, from the Russians and the Algerians, who also claim that regulatory
interventions in the market dampen their enthusiasm for new large-scale investments. Some potential interventions, possibly stemming
from the growing EU opposition to foreign investors with trading interests in the EU infrastructure, are seen as downright hostile by
such producers. Under these conditions, can consumers be confident in their reliance on such suppliers to make the necessary
investments in long-term gas exploitation, particularly in the gas-to-power sector? As a result, is natural gas supply really so
reliable that it can contribute to an easing of supply security anxieties and to combatting climate change?
284
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
Daniel Yergin, Chair of Cambridge Energy Research Associates, 3-06, “Ensuring Energy Security”, Foreign
Affairs, EBSCO, [Crystal Xia]
Markets need to be recognized as a source of security in themselves. The energy security system was created when energy prices
were regulated in the United States, energy trading was only just beginning, and futures markets were several years away. Today,
large, flexible, and well-functioning energy markets provide security by absorbing shocks and allowing supply and demand
to respond more quickly and with greater ingenuity than a controlled system could. Such markets will guarantee security
for the growing LNG market and thereby boost the confidence of the countries that import it. Thus, governments must
resist the temptation to bow to political pressure and micromanage markets. Intervention and controls, however well
meaning, can backfire, slowing and even preventing the movement of supplies to respond to disruptions. At least in the United
States, any price spike or disruption evokes the memory of the infamous gas lines of the 1970s--even for those who were only
toddlers then (and perhaps even for those not yet born at the time). Yet those lines were to a considerable degree self-inflicted--the
consequence of price controls and a heavy-handed allocation system that sent gasoline where it was not needed and denied its
being sent where it was.
285
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
A hedge is a mechanism to reduce the risk of paying high prices for natural gas in the future. However, wind is not a perfect
substitute for gas-fired energy. Wind does not blow on demand and is available only intermittently. Thus, wind energy can
only be used when it is available and cannot reliably displace all gas generation. The hedge provided by wind is similar to a
financial swap (Bolinger et al., 2002) in that a resource with a stable price is substituted for a resource with a highly volatile price.
If a utility uses wind as a hedge against volatile natural gas prices, it foregoes savings when gas prices are low but avoids paying
high prices when gas prices are high. A wind hedge, as it has developed so far, does not provide the utility with the option of
taking wind energy only when gas prices are high. As discussed further below, utilities typically take all the energy output from
a wind facility regardless of gas prices.
286
DDI 2008 Natural Gas Generic
Natural GasGe
Maggie & Co.
China's thirst for energy has become a decisive plot element in suspense novels and films. Even in the real world there is no
shortage of suspicion: some in the United States see a Chinese grand strategy to preempt the United States and the West when it
comes to new oil and gas supplies, and some strategists in Beijing fear that the United States may someday try to interdict
China's foreign energy supplies. But the actual situation is less dramatic. Despite all the attention being paid to China's efforts to
secure international petroleum reserves, for example, the entire amount that China currently produces per day outside of its own
borders is equivalent to just 10 percent of the daily production of one of the supermajor oil companies. If there were a serious
controversy between the United States and China involving oil or gas, it would likely arise not because of a competition for the
resources themselves, but rather because they had become part of larger foreign policy issues (such as a clash over a specific
regime or over how to respond to Iran's nuclear program). Indeed, from the viewpoint of consumers in North America, Europe,
and Japan, Chinese and Indian investment in the development of new energy supplies around the world is not a threat but
something to be desired, because it means there will be more energy available for everyone in the years ahead as India's and
China's demand grows.
287