Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Guide for Oral Proposal

Guide for Oral Proposal

Ratings: (0)|Views: 2 |Likes:
Published by mesdejen

More info:

Published by: mesdejen on Jun 21, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

06/21/2012

pdf

text

original

 
Research Proposal
Mechanics for Oral Proposal
STUDENTSPrepare Chapter 1 to 3with their ResearchRESEARCHADVISERRevision/corrections mustbe done by theENDORSEMENT BY THEADVISERENDORSEMENT BY THERESEARCH COORDINATORDEAN’S APPROVALSCHEDULING OF RESEARCHPROPOSALSUBMISSION OF RESEARCHPROPOSALRESEARCH PROPOSALCOMPLETION OF NECESSARYFORM FORREVISED PROPOSAL
 
SUBMISSION OF RESEARCHPROPOSAL
 
1.The Researchers must see to it that all equipment (LCD, Projector)necessary for the presentation are requested ahead of time.
2.
 The Researchers are expected to be at the assigned room 15 minutesprior to the allotted presentation time.3.The Researcher will only be given 15 minutes to present their studyusing the guide matrix provided by the research committee.4.The panel of reactors will be allowed to give their reaction, commentsand suggestion after the last presentation.
Revision of the Research Proposal
1.
If any of the panel finds any deficiency in the research, the researchcoordinator must be informed at least before the oral proposal, theconsensus of the panel will determine whether the scheduled proposalwill push through or be postponed/cancelled, until the necessaryrevision is done.
2.
Panel should give grades based on the criteria set and approved by theresearch committee, failing grade should not be given unless theresearcher/s did not comply with the minimum requirements given bythe committee. The research may be rejected if the researchers failed to show theauthenticity of their paper and evidence of plagiarism is apparent.
 
RESEARCH PROPOSAL EVALUATION FORM
 TITLE OF THE STUDY:_________________________________________________________________PLEASE RATE (TICK THE BOX) ON THE SCALE OF 1-4 WITH1UNACCEPTABLE2- WEAK3 GOO4 - EXCELLENT

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->