Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Statistical Mechanics
Statistical Mechanics
Dr Alfred Huan
Contents
1 What is Statistical Mechanics?
1.1 Key Ideas in the module . . . . . . . . . 1.2 Why do we study Statistical Mechanics? 1.3 De nitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.3.1 Microstate . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.3.2 Macrostate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3
3 4 4 4 5
2 Distribution Law
2.1 Distribution Law & Ensemble Approaches . . . . . . . . . . 2.2 Computation of Most Probable Macrostate Distribution, nj . 2.3 Problems in Derivation of Maxwell-Boltzmann Distribution . 2.3.1 nj not being always large . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.3.2 What about the other macrostates? . . . . . . . . . . 2.3.3 What happens when we have many energy levels? . . 2.4 Time Evolution of system of microstates . . . . . . . . . . . 2.5 Alternative Derivation for Maxwell-Boltzmann Distribution . 2.6 Examples of Counting in Statistical Mechanics . . . . . . . . 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4
6 7 11 11 11 14 15 16 17
3 Indistinguishable Particles
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bose-Einstein Distribution for Bosons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fermi-Dirac Distribution for Fermions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Alternative Derivation for Bose-Einstein and Fermi-Dirac Statistics First Law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Second Law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Third Law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Calculation of Other Thermodynamic Variables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
20
20 21 23 24 26 27 29 30
26
5.1 Classical Perfect Gas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 5.2 Harmonic Oscillator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 5.3 Equipartition Theorem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 6.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 6.2 Spin 1 Quantum System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 2 6.3 Spin J Quantum System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 1
33 42
CONTENTS
7.1 Fermi-Dirac Distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 7.2 Free Electron Model of Metals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 Introduction to Black Body Radiation Bose-Einstein Distribution . . . . . . . Planck's Radiation Formula . . . . . . Radiation emitted by blackbody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
51 59
59 60 61 63
9.1 The Classical Regime . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 9.2 Monatomic Gas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 9.3 Gibbs Paradox . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Number of impacts on Area A of a wall . E usion of molecules . . . . . . . . . . . Mean Free Path, . . . . . . . . . . . . Collision cross-section, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
66 71
71 73 74 75 76
For example in an ideal gas, We assume that the molecules are non-interacting, i.e. they do not a ect each other's energy levels. Each particle contains a certain energy. At T 0, the system possesses a total energy,E. So, how is E distributed among the particles? Another question would be, how the particles are distributed over the energy levels. We apply statistical mechanics to provide the answer and thermodynamics demands that the entropy be maximum at equilibrium. Thermodynamics is concerned about heat and the direction of heat ow, whereas statistical mechanics gives a microscopic perspective of heat in terms of the structure of matter and provides a way of evaluating the thermal properties of matter, for e.g., heat capacity.
1.3 De nitions
1.3.1 Microstate
A Microstate is de ned as a state of the system where all the parameters of the constituents particles are speci ed Many microstates exist for each state of the system speci ed in macroscopic variables E, V, N, ... and there are many parameters for each state. We have 2 perspectives to approach in looking at a microstate : 1. Classical Mechanics The position x,y,z and momentum Px, Py , Pz will give 6N degrees of freedom and this is put in a phase space representation. 2. Quantum Mechanics The energy levels and the state of particles in terms of quantum numbers are used to specify the parameters of a microstate.
1.3.2 Macrostate
A Macrostate is de ned as a state of the system where the distribution of particles over the energy levels is speci ed.. The macrostate includes what are the di erent energy levels and the number of particles having particular energies. It contains many microstates. In the equilibrium thermodynamic state, we only need to specify 3 macroscopic variables P,V,T or P,V,N or E,V,N, where P : pressure, V : Volume, T : Temperature, N : Number of particles and E : Energy. The equation of state for the system relates the 3 variables to a fourth, for e.g. for an ideal gas.
PV = NkT
We also have examples of other systems like magnetic systems where we include M, the magnetization. However, the equilibrium macrostate is unknown from thermodynamics. In statistical mechanics, the equilibrium tends towards a macrostate which is the most stable. The stability of the macrostate depends on the perspective of microstates. We adopt the a priori assumption which states the macrostate that is the most stable contains the overwhelming majority of microstates. This also gives the probabilistic approach in physics.
The A Priori assumption states that all microstates of a given E are equally probable thus the equilibrium macrostate must have overwhelming .
Equilibrium state
Macrostates
The disorder number is proportional to thermodynamic probability, i.e. how probable for a particular macrostate to be the one corresponding to equilibrium.
2.3
Level j has degeneracy gj so any of the nj particles can enter into any of the gj levels. Number of ways = gjnj For all levels, Number of ways = 2.4 2.5 2.6
Y
j
gjnj
Y gjnj Total = N ! n ! j j
2. Maximise by keeping xed E, N. These constraints are introduced through Lagrange multipliers. For a xed V, it means that the energy levels,"j are unchanged. Maximise subject to
nj = N
and At maximum,
nj "j = E
2.7 2.8
d =0
dln = 1 d
=0 Hence we can choose to maximise ln instead of ln = ln N ! +
X
j
nj ln gj ,
X
j
ln nj !
2.9
Z1 N
1
ln n ln ndn 2.11
= n ln n , n N 1 = N ln N , N + 1 Or
N X
1
ln n 4 n =
1 = N x ln x , x 1N + N ln N 1 , N 1 = ,N + ln N + 1 + N ln N , ln N = N ln N , N + 1
N ln n + N ln N d n 1 N N N
1
2.12
n where 4n = d N = dx.
X
j
X X
j j
nj ln gj , nj ln nj + nj 2.13
nj ln gj , nj lnnj
g nj ln nj
j
by assuming large nj also, which is not always true. X g dln = ln nj dnj , dnj = 0 j j It is subjected to the constraints :
j
2.14
X
j
X
j
g ln nj dnj = 0
j
2.15
10
,
so we get We choose and such that
X
j
X
j
The equilibrium macrostate becomes : nj = gj e e, "j = P Ngj, "j e, "j j gj e = Ngj e, "j Maxwell-Boltzmann Distribution Z where z is the partition function
g ln nj + , "j = 0
j
2.18
1 We will prove later that is equal to kT where k is the Boltzmann constant k = 1:38 10,23JK ,1 mol,1 and T is the temperature.
For "j
For T = 0, nj = 0, except for n1, i.e. all the particles are at ground state. For T 0, the upper levels get piled by particles provided 4" kT 2.19 Otherwise, the population of upper levels remain small. In lasers, population inversion leads to negative temperature,
2 n2 = g2e, kT "1 n1 g1e, kT "2 e, kT 1 = , "1 e kT
"
2.20
for g1 = g2 ,
2.21
11
P j n n nj = P j in j ~ j i j
Ngj e kTj nj = P ,"j gj e kT
,"
2.22
2.23
2.3.1
nj not being always large P If the total number of levels j 1 is small and T is large enough, then every level j has many particles so that for large nj . Stirling's approximation can be used.
If many levels exist, the lower levels will have large nj but higher levels will have small nj . Many of the higher levels will give ln nj ! 0. Note that 0! = 1! = 1. However, the higher levels contribute very negligibly to ln nj ! so that we can apP proximate again by nj ln nj , nj because many of the lower levels have large nj .
How does the change when we consider other macrostates? Consider the changes from the most probable macrostate nj to another distribution nj .
nj = nj + nj
Since ln nj = N ln N , N , = N ln N ,
2.24 nj ln nj , nj
X
j
X
j
nj ln nj
2.25
12
X X
j
nj + nj lnnj + nj
nj + nj ln nj + ln1 + nj nj j 2 X n = N ln N , nj + nj ln nj + n j , 1 nj + :::: 2 n j j j 2 X = N ln N , nj ln nj + nj + nj ln nj + 1 nj + ::: 2 n j j X X 1X n 2 = ln nj , nj , nj ln nj , 2 nj + :::: j j j j where
2.26
nj = N e kT Z
,"j
X
j
nj = 0 nj "j = 0
and Thus,
X
j
ln nj = ln nj ,
2.27
P nj 2
nj
2.28
Since nj are large, the uctuations allowed are very small, by comparison, e.g. if nj 1020, nj . 1010 for nj to be large. Thus nj nj , so the uctuation is minor.. Ultimately, in deriving properties of the system, minor uctuations will not matter very much.
13
(i)
(ii)
(ii)
Macrostates
Alternatively, we can also argue the problem out by the choice of a fractional deviation 2 = j njj j , and we assume is the same for all j. Then, n
X nj 2 X 2 nj = j nj j = 2N
Hence nj = nj e, 2 N which is small unless
2 1 . N , i.e,
2.29
2.30
1 2.31 N so nj needs to be small in order for nj to be signi cantly large. In either case, we see that nj will be small when the uctuation nj is large Now we come back to the total number of macrostates : The total number of macrostates consistent with constraints :
n j nj j . pj
nj e
= nj
, n2 1
n1
Y
j
d n1 e
, n2 2
n2
d n2 :::::::
nj 1 2
2.32
14
If total number of energy levels, G is very much less than N, then nj N and j = 1,2, G ....., G. X 2 2.33 nj N G G ln Now so ln
ln nj + G ln N , G lnG 2 2
ln N ln G
ln nj N ln N
ln nj
P The total number of microstates are not mainly due to the maximum term nj , i.e. 6= nj . Hence Stirling's approximation is invalid in this case. ~ We resort to the following trick : Energy levels are closely spaced in groups because G is large. They are grouped into bunches of gi with mi occupation. gi and mi can be made large in this case.
i=1 first bundle 1 of g1 bundles The energy levels are so closely spaced such that they are grouped into bundles of g i levels
i=2
,"
2.37
15
We take the time average value of nj over a large number of di erent macrostates. mi = mi g i ," 2.38 Ne kTj = P ,"j j e kT mi = N !
ln nj = ln 2.40 By grouping closely spaced levels, the time-averaged variations are small and the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution describes nj very well. Otherwise with nj 1, the variation at each j level appears large. The treatment tries to obtain the average ni over many di erent but similar macrostates. After a series of attack on our fundamental assumptions, we come to establish the basis of statistical mechanics : All macrostates of signi cant probability i.e. large
Y gimi i mi ! X
2.39
have roughly the same properties and distribution close to the MaxwellBoltzmann distribution ignoring minor changes.
16
Rij!kl = Ni Nj Tij!kl
where Tij!kl is the transition probability. The total rate out from level i :
2.41
Ri out = Ni
The total rate in to level i :
X
j;k;l
Nj Tij!kl
2.42
Ri in =
At equilibrium,
X
j;k;l
Nk Nl Tkl!ij
2.43
Ri out = Ri in
Therefore it follows that :
2.44 2.45
Ni
X
j;k;l
Nj Tij!kl =
X
j;k;l
Nk Nl Tkl!ij
Now we invoke the time-reversal invariance, which is true for almost all transitions,
Tkl!ij = Tij!kl
2.46
17
2.50 2.51
"i
g1 = 2
6 particles
We also note importantly that there are no equilibrium macrostate in this problem because all the macrostates have di erent total energies. There are 7 macrostates namely : 6,0, 5,1, 4,2, 3,3, 2,4, 1,5 and 0,6. Now we come to calculate the microstates : For 6,0 macrostate, = 26 ways
18
! n n = n Nn ! g1 1 g2 2 1! 2 6! 25 5 ways = 5!1! Subsequently, we can calculate for the remaining macrostates, using the example above. Problem 2 : Given 5 energy levels, each separated by E . We consider the particles to be weakly interacting, i.e. they exchange energy but do not a ect each other's energy levels. Let us look at the rst 3 levels : i a particle moves from the 3rd level down to the 2nd level and ii a particle moves from 1st level to the 2nd level. In this case, the change in energy is balanced by exchange of particles for the 2 processes. Hence we can talk about a xed macrostate. Now we try to calculate Now we consider the schematic picture of this problem :
E E E E
=6 C5 1 C0 1 C1 0 C0 0 C0 = 6 ways =6 C4 2 C2 0 C0 0 C0 0 C0 = 15 ways
At equilibrium, we apply the weighted average for microstates, because the number of microstates in either macrostate is not overwhelming enough. P P n = nj i nj ~ 2.52
j i
Therefore,
n1 = 5 6 + 4 15 ~ 6 + 15 90 = 21
19
X
which is the same as
nj = 6 ~
a 2b1c3::::: a 2b3c1::::: a 1b3c2::::: etc. All particles are identical so all permutations are solutions to Schrodinger's equations, and so are all linear combination of the permutations.
There are two physically meaningful solutions. 1. Symmetric :
s =
E.g. for 3 particles, we get
X
p
P 1; 2; ::::; N
3.1
a =
X
p
3.2
21
where P is the permutation operator; ,1P means ,1 every time we exchange two particle states. E.g., for 3 particles, we get
+ , 1! The number of ways = mi !ggi, 1! mi i Therefore, = mi + gi , 1! mi !gi , 1! To maximise subject to the constraints :
3.3
3.4
X
i
X
i
mi = N
mi"i = E
22
X
i X i X i
lnmi + gi , 1! , ln mi! , lngi , 1! mi + gi , 1 lnmi + gi , 1 , mi + gi , 1 , mi ln mi + mi , gi , 1 lngi , 1 , gi , 1 mi + gi lnmi + gi , mi ln mi , gi ln gi 3.5 1
for gi; mi
dln =
X
i
3.6 3.7
X mi + gi ln m dmi = 0 i i
Add in :
,
So
X
i
dmi = 0
"idmi = 0
3.8
X
i
ln mi + gi + , "idmi = 0 mi
Then, Therefore,
1 where = kT to be proved later.
mi + gi = e, e mi
"i
3.9 3.10
mi = e, eg"ii , 1
3.11
We will nd later that = kT where is the chemical potential. Two systems at thermodynamic equilibrium have the same temperature T. The systems at chemical particle number equilibrium have the same .
23
gi.
etc...
Therefore
3.12 3.13
Y
i
mi!gi , mi! mi = N
gi
X
i
X
i
mi"i = E
3.14
Therefore, ln where gi
X
i
mi
d ln =
mi
3.15
Now we add in :
,
So
X
i
dmi = 0
"idmi = 0
3.16
X
i
ln gi , mi + , "idmi = 0 m
i
24
gi , mi = e, e mi
"i
mi = e, eg"ii + 1 Averaging over the gi levels in each clump, nj = e, e 1"j + 1 which is the Fermi-Dirac Distribution.
Note :
1 The positive sign in Fermi-Dirac distribution implies that nj 1 which is Pauli Exclusion principle which states that no 2 fermions can share the same quantum state. 2 If nj = N is not a constraint, is zero and this is true for open systems. For isolated systems with xed N, has a value.
Riout = Ni Riin =
X
j;k;l
Nj Tij!kl1 Nk 1 Nl
3.20
3.21
At equilibrium,
Ni
X
j;k;l
X
j;k;l
Nk Nl Tkl!ij 1 Nj
3.22 3.23
25
Ni Nj = Nk Nl 1 Ni 1 Nj 1 Nk 1 Nl N N N N ln 1 iN + ln 1 jN = ln 1 k + ln 1 lN Nk i j l
with
3.29
"i
Ni Nie e, "i = e e,
3.30
3.31 Ni = e, e 1"i 1 So starting with the positive + sign, we obtain Ni = e, e 1"i + 1 Fermi-Dirac Distribution 3.32 and with the negative - sign, we obtain Ni = e, e 1"i , 1 Bose-Einstein Distribution 3.33 For fermions, the rate Riout 1 , Nk 1 , Nl which demostrates Pauli's Exclusion Principle, and for bosons, the rate Riout 1 + Nk 1 , Nl , i.e. the more particles in k and l, the more likely the transition. The more you have, the more you receive.
dU = dQ + dW
In Statistical Mechanics : Total Energy; E = U = Therefore
4.1
X
j
nj "j
4.2 4.3
dU =
X
j
"j dnj +
X
j
nj d"j
Now, we have dW = ,PdV or 0Hdm etc. This occurs when there is a change in the boundary conditions V, M, etc. When the boundary conditions change, the energy levels change. For example : particle in a box Hence So, e.g.
2 2 "j = ~2m 12 n2 + n2 + n2 V3 x y z
4.4 4.5
dW =
X
j
nj d"j
,P =
or
X @"j nj @V j X @"j nj @m j
26
4.6 4.7
0H =
27
dW
Original
dQ
Then dQ=
In kinetic theory, the particles may collide with the chamber walls and acquire more energy where the walls are hotter with more heat added.
S f
so S1 = f 1 and S2 = f 2, Now f 1 2 = f 1 + f 2
28
@f @
So Also
1 1
= @f @
1 1
2
2
= @f 1 @ 1
4.15
@f @ @f @
1 2 2
= @f 1 @
1 1
= @f @
= @f 2 @
2
Then 1 @f 1 = 1 @f 2 2 @ 1 1 @ 2
So
S1 = f 1 = k ln S2 = f 2 = k ln S = k ln 1 + k ln = S1 + S2
which implies that C = 0. Therefore
+C +C +C
S = k ln
R where k is the Boltzmann constant NA . To be proven later
4.23
Hence we have a microscopic meaning of entropy. The system is perfectly ordered when = 1 and S = k ln = 0. When more microstates are availiable 1 so S 0. The lesser the knowledge about a system, the more disordered it gets. From the formula which we obtained for the relation of entropy with , we are unable to deduce the value of k. The value of k comes out from the ideal gas equation.
29
S = k log E0 = 0
Practically, some small interactions e.g. nuclear paramagnetism may lift the ground state degeneracy. If kT "int, then S 6= 0 at a given T. Hence we can only say S ! S0 as T ! 0 where S0 is the entropy associated with the remaining small interactions for which "int kT and independent of all the entropy for all the other interactions degrees of freedom.
The atoms occupying in the ground state are placed in fixed position in a lattice like this.
Note that it is meaningless to talk about the exchange of particles in the same state because they do not exchange their positions. We know from the 2nd law of thermodynamics that heat passes from hot high temperature to cold low temperature if no work is done. The internal energy UT increases when T increases. Now we come to the formulation of the third law : The Third Law of Thermodynamics states that as the temperature T ! 0, the entropy S ! 0, it is approaching ground state as UT also approaches 0, that the disorder number tends to 1. From the third law, T=0 is a theoretically correct statement, but it is an impossibility. Why is this so? The answer : There exists very small interactions in the nucleus, made up of magnetic moments, quadrapole moments and octapole moments etc. In order to make T = 0, the magnetic moments are required to point in the same direction. However, experimentally, this is not achievable. The third law of thermodynamics can also be understood in a quantum mechanical
30
, 2~m @ + V = H @x2
2 2
The V consists of many interaction terms. Hence we can approach the total entropy, S as a combination of entropies of many sub-systems :
Z=
where j represents all levels.
X
j
gj e kT
,"j
4.24
Now we try to nd the relation between P and T, when 2 systems are in thermal equilibrium, where will be the same. The depends on the nature of the particles and volume V etc. For the system of same identical particles, free exchange of particles will allow to reach the same value. Now we proceed to calculate the other thermodynamic variables.
@Z j = X ," g e, @ V;N j j j
where which is proven in tutorial. = 1 kT
"j
4.25
U=
4.26
Since,
d =, 1 dT kT 2
31
4.27
We know that
nj = N gj e, Z
"j
g Z nj = N e "j j
Then we work out ln , ln = N ln N ! +
X
j
nj ln gj , ln nj !
= N ln N , N +
j
Xj = N ln N + nj "j + N ln Z , N ln N
= U + N ln Z
g nj ln nj + nj
j
4.28
Therefore
S = k ln = k U + Nk ln Z = U + Nk ln Z T F = U , TS F = ,NkT ln Z
4.29
4.30 4.31
Since
4.32
32
@F dF = @V T dV + @F V dT @T @F P = , @V T = NkT @ ln Z T @V S = , @F V @T
4.33
Entropy :
4.34 = Nk ln Z + NkT @Z Z @T = Nk ln Z + U T Then we can use the results above to compute the heat capacity at constant volume : Cv = @U V 4.35 @T
33
34
Now we compute the partition function, Z and in this case gj = 1, because all the states are summed over. X "j Z = e, kT
x y z e, 2mkTL2 n2 +n2 +n2 nx ny nz X ,~2 22 n2 X ,~2 22 n2 X ,~2 22 n2 = e 2mkTL x e 2mkTL y e 2mkTL z ny nz Znx1 Z Z ,~2 2 n2 1 ,~2 2 n2 1 ,~2 2 z 2mkTL2 x 2mkTL2 y = dnxe dny e dnz e 2mkTL2 n2
XXX
~2 2
5.1
Z
0
2 2 1 Let x = 2,~ 2 2 nx mL kT
5.2
where
,1
1 ,1
e,x2 dx =
=
Z,1 Z 1
e,x2 dx
1
1 ,1
e,y2 dy 21
5.3
Therefore
2 Z = L3 2mkT 3 h2 3 = V 2mkT 2 2 h
5.4 5.5
So,
5.6
35
PV = nRT Nk = nR n k = NR R k=N A
because
N n
5.7
5.8
Also the entropy is given by : S = U + Nk ln Z T 3 Nk + 3 Nk ln 2mk + Nkln V + 3 ln T = 2 2 h2 2 Therefore, the distribution becomes : ,"j nj = N e kT Z Nh3 e ,"j kT = 3 V 2mkT 2 where j represent all nx, ny and nz states. The number of particles having energies between " and " + " : , Nh3 e kT" dn " n = 3 V 2mkT 2 d" where
dn d"
5.9
5.10
5.11
To calculate the density of states, we consider the quantum numbers nx, ny and nz making up the grid points with each grid point representing one state.
36
R2 = n2 + n2 + n2 x y z
4 The number of points states with energy up to "R lie within a sphere of volume 3 R3. Only positive n's are allowed so we take the positive octant.
The number of states lying between energy " and " + " will become :
5.12
d" = ~22 R dR mL2 dn " = R mL2 " d" 2 ~232 2 3 1 = 2m3L " 2 " 4 ~3
5.13
Therefore,
3 2
" 3 V Nh3 e, kT 2v 2m 2 " 2 " 1 n = 3 3 h 2mkT 2 1 , " N" 2 kT = p e 3 " 2 4 kT
5.14
d" = p dp m
37
5.15
ZZZ
all p space
dpxdpy dpz =
=
2
Z0 1
0
p
2
sin pdp
p2dp
4p dp
5.16
Therefore we can also express in px, py and pz as p2 N e, 2mkT p p p n = x y z 3 2mkT 2 x p2 + z y N e, p2 2+mkT p2 p p p = x y z 3 2mkT 2 p2 p2 p2 y N e, 2mkT p e, 2mkT p e, 2mkT p z x = x y z 3 2mkT 2 For velocity distribution, we use p = mv, n = f vx; vy ; vz dvxdvy dvz 2 2 2 3 mvx +vy +vz = Nm 3 e, 2kT vxvy vz 2mkT 2 = gvdv 3 mv2 = Nm 4 3 e, 2kT v2dv 2mkT 2 which are the Maxwell distribution laws for velocities and speeds. We invoke a few integral identities :
5.17
5.18
In =
I0 = 2 I1 = 1 2 I2 = 1 I0 2 I3 = I1 I4 = 3 I2 2
0 p
e,x2 xndx
38
Z
0
5.19
5.20
5.21
Average energy, 1 mv2 = 3 kT 2 2 Root mean square RMS speed, v2 = The most probable speed :
3 dgv = 0 2v e ,2mv2 , mvp e ,2mv2 = 0 kT kT p dv r kT kT vp = 2m
5.22
3kT m
v
5.23
5.24
39
Vp
V2
vp v
v2
"j = j + 1 ~! 2
e,
j + 1 ~! 2
kT
! = e, 2~kT ! = e, 2~kT
1 X
j =0
e, kT
j ~!
1 ~! 1 , e, kT ~! 1 = e, 2 1 , e, ~!
5.25
40
a arn = 1 , r
5.26
ln Z = , 1 ~! , ln1 , e, ~! 2
U = ,N @lnZ @ 1 = 2 N ~! + 1 , N, ~! ~!e, ~! e 1+ 1 = N ~! 2 e ~! , 1 = N ~! 1 + ~! 1 2 e kT , 1 At low T, U 1 N~!, it means that the oscillators are in ground state. 2
At high T, 1 1 U = N ~! 2 + ~! 1 + kT + ::: , 1 = N ~! 1 + kT 2 ~! = NkT
5.27
5.28
which is the classical result. The high energy states are occupied. Quantization is not important for kT ~! "=
The Equipartition theorem states that all terms in the Hamiltonian with squared coordinates x or px etc will contribute 1 kT to the average energy, provided quantization 2 is not important. This is re ected in the classical regime at high T where kT "int. Example 1 : Ideal Gas, H = kinetic energy only p2 + p2 + p2 y z x = 2m 2m 2m Therefore U = 3 kT N atoms 2 = 3 NkT 2
41
Therefore
With quantization setting in at low T, the Hamiltonian is frozen out and the contribution is not 1 kT. 2 Example 3 : Diatomic gas, For translational motion,
p2 + p2 + p2 y z x Htrans = 2m 2m 2m
2 1 L2 Hrot = 1 Lx + 2 I y 2I
p0z2 + 1 k z0 2 Hvib = 2m 2 0 where z' is the relative coordinate between the 2 atoms.
Therefore, the total internal energy, U should be 7 NkT. However, the experimental 2 results show that U = 5 NkT. 2 The reason is because the vibrational motion is frozen out, i.e. ~!vib kT. So in terms of Hvib , the atoms are in ground state, i.e. atoms don't appear to vibrate much at normal temperature. Total H = Hvib + Htrans + Hrot 5.29
J = ,gJ B J
When the system interacts with an external magnetic eld, Hamiltonian, H = ,~ B ~ ~ ~ = gJ B B J = gJ B Bz Jz Quantization
6.1
6.2
The Jz and J are observed from atomic physics. B = 2e~ Bohr Magneton mc In a solid, the outer electrons are involved in valency for chemical bonds, which are ultimately paired up so that the net J of outer electrons is zero. The inner core, particularly 3d, 4d and 4f orbitals of many elements are not involved in valency, so magnetism arises from their S, L and J. In many solids of transition elements 3d, the orbital quenching occurs, so that the net L = 0 for atoms in the ground electronic state. Note that the excited electronic states are unoccupied at room temperature because " kT . Hence in the ground electronic state of 3d elements, there is a degeneracy of 2S + 1 states. Note that J = S.
42
43
3 2 1 2 -1 2 -3 2
B 0
6.3
The distribution in the spin states is associated with the spin temperature TS which may not be the same as the lattice temperature TL . A mechanism must exist for TS and TL to establish thermal equilibrium - spin-phonon interaction. This is important in spin resonance experiments such as electron spin resonance and nuclear magnetic resonance, and determines the relaxation time .
6.5
44
So
where
The entropy S :
gs B B gs B B E = N , 1 gsB Be+ 2kT + 1 gsB Be, 2kT Z 2 2 Ngs B B sinh gsB B =, Z 2kT Ngs B B tanh gsB B =, Z 2kT
6.11
S = U + Nk ln Z T = , NgsB B tanh gsB B + Nk ln2 cosh gsB B T 2kT 2kT The magnetization M :
1X M = V nj j j X + j B kT = VN Z j e gs B B gs B B 1 = VN 1 gsB e 2kT , 2 gsB e, 2kT Z2 N g sinh gsB B = VZ s B 2kT 1 N g tanh gsB B = 2V s B 2kT E = , BV
6.12
6.13
where " = B
45
0 -(J-1) -J
B=0
mJ = ,J; ,J , 1; ::::::; 0; 1; ::::; J , 1; J Therefore there are 2J + 1 states. "J = gJ B BmJ where gJ is the Lande g-factor an experimental quantity. Let y = gJ B B Therefore, the partition function, J X gJ B B Z= e
=
mJ =,J J X mJ =,J
6.14
eymJ eymJ
= e,yJ
2J X
6.15
sinhJ + 1 y 2 sinh y 2
46
Then
nJ = N e, Z N e, =Z
"J gJ B BmJ
6.16
X Magnetization, M = VN Z gJ B mJ e @Z = VN 1 @B Z N 1 @Z @y = V Z @y @B = VN gJ B @Z Z @y ln = N gJ B @ @yZ V
gJ B BmJ
6.17
6.18
6.19
where
We proceed to evaluate other thermodynamic quantities : Helmholtz free energy, F = ,NkT ln Z = ,NkT lnsinhJ + 1 y , lnsinh y 2 2 Internal energy, U = ,N @ ln Z @ ln @y = ,N @ @yZ @ = ,NgJ B BJBJ y 6.21
6.22
47 6.23
,x
6.24
So,
1 BJ y = J J + 1 2
Therefore,
1 1 + J + 2 y , 1 1 + y 2 3 2 y 3 J + 1 y 2 2 1 2 1 1 J + 2 y , 1 , y =J y+ 3 y 12 = 31 J 2 + J y J y J + 1 = 3
6.25
so,
6.26
6.27
48
U = , NgJ B BJ J + 1y ! 0 3
ln Z ln2J + 1 6.28
6.29
or
Then
S = Nk ln2J + 1
for 2J + 1 levels. At low T, y So, Therefore 1, and for large x, coth x = ex + e,x = 1 e ,e
x
6.31
,x
1 BJ y = J J + 1 , 1 = 1 2 2
6.32 6.33
where all spins are align in the same direction parallel to B, hence ! 0.
M = N gJ B J V
49
6.34
6.35 6.36
From the third law, S ! 0 as T ! 0, so cooling reduces the entropy of system, so we need magnetic dipoles to align in one direction. But alignment can also be produced with a B- eld, so we need the alignment to stay as we reduce the B- eld to zero. So adiabatic cooling is two-staged. 1. Reduce the entropy by turning on the B- eld isothermally. The paramagnetic system is in contact with the lattice and the heat bath. As B- eld increases, dipoles align more and energy and entropy is taken out from the system.
Ts Spin System TL Lattice Heat Bath at constant T
2. Reduce the temperature by turning o the B- eld adiabatically, i.e. isolated from heat bath.
50
As B decreases, Sspin stays constant, so TS decreases. The lattice passes heat and entropy back to spin. But this entropy is so small because of low TL , SLat is small, so the heat passing is very small. dQ = TdS. Hence both TS and TL will drop drastically.
S Entropy Curves obeying the third law
B=0
T Note : They obey the 3rd law Stage (1) : From P to Q, Isothemal Magnetization Stage (2) : From Q to R, Adiabatic Demagnetization
nj = e, egj" , 1
1 For either systems, = kT . This can be proven by having the quantum system in 1 contact with a classical perfect gas where = kT . The two s will reach equilibrium at same temperature.
Now to identify for Fermi-Dirac distribution, we consider 2 fermion systems in thermal and di usive contact so to allow particle exchange. We also assume that the same type of fermions for both systems. With the same constraints :
X X ni + nj = N X ni "i + nj "j = E
= i j Y Y i j = n !g g, n ! n !g g, n !
i i i i j j j j
7.3
51
52
X X
j i i
dln =
X
i
X
j
=0
7.5
,
So,
X
i
X
i
ln gi , ni , + "idni + n
i
X
j
7.6
Then
ln gi , ni , + "i = 0 ni gj , nj , + " = 0 ln n j j
So the two systems in thermal contact have the same and the two systems in di usive contact will have the same , which is related to . The di usive contact gives rise to chemical equilibrium, so i = j = chemical potential Suppose we take one of the systems : Sj = k ln j X = gj ln gj , gj , nj lngj , nj , nj ln nj
j
ni = e, eg"ii + 1 nj = e, eg"jj + 1
7.7
53
dS = k
=k
X
j
7.8
7.9
dU = TdS + dW + dN
Therefore So
= kT
7.10
7.11 +1 where dN is the work done in moving the fermions from one place to another, e.g electrical work.
" , e jkT
nj =
gj
54
7.12
2
2 k2 = L2 n2 + n2 + n2 x y z
nz
7.13
nR ny
nx
7.14
Note : we multiply the relation by 2 because of the 2 spin states and 1 because we 8 only take the positive octant, i.e. nx, ny and nz are all positive integers. Number of states between k and k+dk = 1 4k2dk 2 L 3 8 V k2dk = 2
7.15
V m" Number of states between " and "+d" is g"d" = 2 2~2 dk d" d" V 2m" m d" = 2 ~2 ~2k r V 2m2 " ~2 d" = 2 4 ~ 2m" 3 m2 1 = 2V 2 2~3 " 2 d" 1 = V C" 2 d"
7.16
55
N=
=
X X
j j
nj e
"j ,
gj
7.17
E=
=
X X
j j
nj "j e
"j ,
7.18 +1 Z 1 "g"d" = e "j , + 1 0 We solve equation 7.17 for N; T; V and use in 7.18 to obtain ". This is di cult to evaluate except at low T. We shall try to evaluate this in 2 cases 1. At T = 0 Probability of occupation of state of energy is fF ,D " =
f F-D (E)
"j gj
"j ,
+1
7.19
EF
For
T = 0 = "F
and
Fermi energy
7.20
fF ,D " = 0 fF ,D " = 1
56
N=
=
Z Z
0 0
1
"F
g"fF ,D"d"
7.21
and
7.22
7.23
The meaning of Fermi energy is that all states below "F are occupied and all states above "F are unoccupied at T = 0. At T=0, all electrons occupy the lowest possible state subject to the Exclusion Principle, so the states are lled until "F . Total Energy, E =
2. At low T, kT 1, we want to nd Cv and we know that the experimental value "F is proportional to T.
7.24
N=
Therefore,
g"fF ,D"d"
U=
"g"d" ", Z0 1 e" , " +g1"d" " g"d" F = + Fj , ", + 1 " +1 Z0 1 "e, " g"d" e F = + N"F ", + 1 e
0
7.25
57
Cv = @U V @T Z 1 " , " g"e ", 7.26 1 1 @ F " , , kT 2 , kT @T d" =, e "j , + 12 0 @ Since does not change much, so we assume @T = 0 and = "F , Z 1 1 1 " , "F 2e ","F V C" 2 d" Cv = kT 2 7.27 e ","F + 12 0 Now, e ","F = , @fF ,D " 7.28 e ","F + 12 @" The maximum occurs at " = "F . The value drops to 1 of the maximum value when e " , "F kT . So the function is sharp for small kT "F .
dfF-D (E) dE
kT
EF
The contribution to the Cv integral comes mainly from values of " near "F , i.e. " "F 1 V C" 1 Z 1 " , "F e ","F d"d" 2 Cv = kT 2 F ","F 2 Z 01 x2e dx + 1 1 ex 2 where x = " , "F = V C"F k2 T "F ex + 12 The lower limit can be extended to ,1 because kT "F . Z 1 x2 exdx 2 = 3 ,1 ex + 12 Therefore 2 Cv = k2 Tg"F 3 where g"F is the density of states of Fermi level. The physical picture : 7.29
7.30 7.31
58
T=0
T>0
EF
For T = 0 : All states are occupied within " = "F is a truncated parabola. For T 0 : We will expect electrons to gain energy kT. However, most electrons cannot gain kT because the states above them are already occupied. Only those electrons near "F can gain kT to move into unoccupied states. This results in a rounded-o cli at "F . An alternative estimate : Number of electrons involved is g"F kT and they gain kT. Therefore Energy of excitation = g"F k2T 2 7.32 Contribution to Cv , heat capacity = The number of electrons participating energy T = g"F kT kT T = f "F k2 T 7.33 Experimental result : Cv T for a fermi gas. The theory is in agreement but does not give the right constant of proportionality, and need to include e ective mass of electron m me because electrons are not completely free but the lattice potential e constrains them.
In this chapter, we will study black body radiation using statistical mechanics. We note that the photons have the following characteristics : 1. The photons have spin 1 bosons and they obey Bose-Einstein statistics. 2. The photons do not interact with one another. 3. The photons have zero rest mass and travel at c, the speed of light. 4. The photons satisfy the dispersion relation, ! = ck, so,
" = ~! = ~ck
59
60
We consider a system of a small blackbody placed inside a chamber with perfect insulating walls. The features of the system are as follows : 1. The blackbody absorbs and emits radiation until thermal equilibrium is established. 2. The number of photons are not conserved because of absorption and re-emission. This implies that and = 0. 3. The blackbody is so small that heat capacity is negligible. The energy content of photons are not changed.
E=
For bosons,
X
j
nj "j = constant
8.1
X X
j X j j
lnnj + gj , 1! , ln nj ! , lngj , 1! nj + gj , 1 lnnj + gj , 1 , nj + gj , 1 , nj ln nj + nj , gj , 1 lngj , 1 + gj , 1 nj + gj , 1 lnnj + gj , 1 , gj , 1 lngj , 1 , nj ln nj 8.2
dln =
X
j
8.3
X nj + gj , 1 ln n dnj = 0 j
61
dnj "j = 0
8.4 8.5
nj = e "jgj, 1
Bose-Einstein function = e "j1, 1 8.6 1 Prove = kT by having the photon system in thermal contact with another system at temperature T and use walls that can exchange energy.
For any photon with ~ = kx, ky , kz , k ! 2 = k2 = k2 + k2 + k2 x y z c2 For any ~ , there are 2 polarizations - 2 linear or 2 circular. k
nz
8.7
nR ny
nx
62
8.8
since
8.9
8.10
N !d! = Density of states Bose-Einstein function !2 = 2c3V e ~d! 1 !, Thus the energy of the photons in the frequency range ! and !+d! is V ~ !3d! ~!N ! d! = 2 3 ~! c e ,1 The energy density per unit volume in the frequency range is 3 ~ Planck's formula u!; T d! = 2c3 e !!d! 1 ~ ,
u(w, T)
8.11
8.12
8.13
T2 T1
T2>T1
e ~! 3!2 , !2 ~e e ~! , 12
~!
=0
63
kT = 2:822
Wien's displacement law
or
!max = 2:822k T ~
So, as T rises, the colour of the blackbody changes from red to blue : Total Energy Intensity, uT =
Therefore
8.18
uT = aT 4
where
Stefan-Boltzmann law
8.19
2 4 a = 15ck~3 3
Consider a tiny hole, A, with photons coming from direction ! + d, ! + d , with a subtended solid angle d , where
64
The photons that will pass through in time t are located in a parallelpiped of length ct. The volume of the parallelpied is dA ct cos .
dA
Therefore, No. of photons passing per unit time from direction ! + d, ! + d with a frequency range ! to ! + d! = Volume of Parallelpiped Fractional solid angle Number density in frequency interval t = dAc cos d N !d! 4 V
Therefore, the total energy radiated per unit time in frequency interval ! to ! + d! Z 2 Z 2 = d sin d dAc cos ~! N !d! 4 V 0 0 = 1 c~!dA N !d! 4 V 1 cu!; T dAd! =4 Therefore Power radiated per unit area in frequency interval from ! to ! + d! = 1 cu!; T d! 4
65
2 k4
Therefore,
In the Fermi-Dirac or Bose Einstein statistics, the classical regime is only satis ed if 1 1 e "r , 1 i.e.
e
so that
"r ,
nr
F-D,B-E
e, "r ,
= e e,
"r
M-B distribution
So all the 3 distributionsMaxwell-Boltzmann, Fermi-Dirac and Bose-Einstein distributions approximate to Maxwell-Boltzmann distributions in the classical regime. According to the Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics, nr M-B= N e, "r Z for all r, including r = 0. So we require
N Z
9.1
66
67
so,
The conditions are high temperature, T and low density N , and high mass, m. V Assume the energy is equipartitioned, " = 3 kT for each atom 2 p2 = 2m So, p p = 2m" = h in QM terms dB Then 3 1 3 2 2 1 = 4 2mkT 3 m" 3 3 1 2 = 2 p3 3 3 3 2 dB = 2 h and 3 N 3 2 3 1 V 2 dB i.e. 1 1 2 1 V 3 2 2 2 dB 3 N = 3 l0 where l0 is the average seperation between atoms. Examples :
9.2
9.3
68
so l0 = 4 10,8cm. Since dB l0 , so Bose Einstein statistics apply. 2. For conduction electrons : Assume 1 electron per atom, hence
l0 2 10,8cm For m = 9:1 10,31 kg and T = 273 K, dB l0, so Fermi-Dirac statistics apply.
g(E)f F-D (E)
T=0
Approximately M-B
T>0
EF
f F-D (E)
T=0
T>0 0 EF E
69
"
V N T S
V N T S
9.4
3 S = 3 2N k + 2N k ln 2V + 2 ln T + 3 ln 2mk 2 2 h2 9.5 = 2Sold + 2Nk ln 2 The problem lies with distinguishability and overcounting. Hence we use a corrected .
old Corrected = N ! Y gjnj = n!
9.6
9.7
70
9.8
,p2
10.1 10.2
where
,mv2
10.3 10.4
A0
71
72
P x dx = Be
where
,V x
kT
dx
10.5 10.6
1 ,V x e kT dx = 1 ,1
We concentrate on the momentum and velocity distributions, hence we do not require the interaction potential except for establishing thermal equilibrium. For graphs of P px or P vx : the gaussian curves centred at zero.
P[px], P[v x ]
px, v x
d dc d
P vx; vy ; vz dvxdvy dvz = P vx dvxP vy dvy P vz dvz 3 2 2 m 2 e ,2mvx e ,2mvy e ,2mvz2 dv dv dv kT kT kT = 2kT x y z m 3 ,mc2 2 e 2kT dccdcsind = 2kT Integrating over all angles : 3 m 2 ,mc2 P c dc = 4 2kT e 2kT c2dc Hence, we can calculate :
10.7
10.8
73
10.9
c=
3. Mean square speed, c2 :
Z
0
1 8kT 2 cP c dc = m
10.10
c2 =
Z
0
kT c2P c dc = 3m
10.11
p
5. Mean kinetic energy KE : Note : so
kT c2 = 3m
1 2
10.12
Mean KE = 1 mc2 = 3 kT 2 2
2 2 2 c2 = vx + vy + vz 2 = 3vx 2 vx = kT m
74
The fraction of molecules travelling in direction ! + d, ! + d is cdcsind = sindd 10.16 4c2 4 The fraction that will reach A in time t for above direction = Ac cos t 10.17 V where V is the volume of the gas. Therefore, Number of impacts on area A in time t =
NP c dc sindd Ac cos t 4 V Number of impacts on unit area per unit time 2 N Z 1 cP c dc Z sin cos d Z 2 d = 4V 0 0 0 N c 1 2 = 4V 2 1 = 4 nc where the number density, n = N . V
ZZZ
10.18
10.19
The number of molecules with speeds c!c+dc from direction ! + d, ! + d imping a area in time t is N cP c dcsindd At 4V The distribution is proportional to c P c dc. The mean speed of escape, ce :
R 2 P dc ce = R ccP cc dc
m
1 2 = 9kT 8m =
3kT
1 8kT 2
10.20
75
1 2
10.21
dx + :::: =1, 1, dx
,dx
10.25
76
10.26
Z
0
,xe, x 1 +
0
x xe, dx
Z
0
x e, dx
x = ,e, 1 0 =
10.27
The moving gas molecules sweeps out a cylinder of cross section : = d2 where d is the diameter of the each molecule. Average volume occupied by each molecule = V = 1 N n 10.29 10.28
So,
Mean free path, = V 1 2 N d 1 = nd2 Taking in account of the motion of gas molecules, 1 = p n1 2 At stp, 7 10,8m. At 10,6 mbar, 5 m.
10.30
10.31