Professional Documents
Culture Documents
By
Scheme of Presentation
Global Financial Crisis Impact on India Difference between US/Europe and India RBIs Policy Response and Impact Lessons from the Crisis Medium-term Issues and Challenges
Scheme of Presentation
Global Financial Crisis
Impact on India Difference between US/Europe and India RBIs Policy Response and Impact Lessons from the Crisis Medium-term Issues and Challenges
Sub-prime lending Originate and distribute model Financial engineering, derivatives Credit rating agencies Lax regulation Large global imbalances
Excessively accommodative monetary policy in the US and other advanced economies (2002-04)
Fundamental cause
Global Financial Crisis (2) Current Account Balance (per cent to GDP)
Country 1990-94 1995-99 2000-04 China 1.4 1.9 2.4 India -1.3 -1.3 0.5 Russia 0.9 3.5 11.2 Saudi Arabia -11.7 -2.4 10.6 United Arab Emirates 8.3 4.6 9.9 United States -1.0 -2.1 -4.5 Memo: Euro area n.a. 0.9 0.4 Middle East -5.1 1.0 8.4
Source: World Economic Outlook Database, April 2009, International Monetary Fund. Note: (-) indicates deficit.
Per cent
Volatility in monetary policy in advanced economies Large volatility in capital flows to EMEs Again very loose MP in US likely surge in capital flows to EMEs?
Jan-90 Dec-90 Nov-91 Oct-92 Sep-93 Aug-94 Jul-95 Jun-96 May-97 Apr-98 Mar-99 Feb-00 Jan-01 Dec-01 Nov-02 Oct-03 Sep-04 Aug-05 Jul-06 Jun-07 May-08
US Monetary policy too loose during 2002-04; aggregate demand exceeded output; large current a/c deficit; mirrored in large surpluses in China and elsewhere.
Large Fed cuts in 2007: strong boost to oil, other commodity and asset prices
0 1992
-200 -400 -600 Direct investment, net Other private capital flows, net Private portfolio flows, net Private capital flows, net
Very large capital flows to EMEs now outflows in 2009 - large volatility - implications for monetary management and financial stability
2008
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
April 2008
July 2008 October 2008 April 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009
1.3 1.3 1.7 1.4 1.5 0.5 6.7 6.6 6.9 6.7 6.9 6.1 3.7 3.8 4.1 3.9 3.9 3.0 Global Trade Volume (Goods and Services) 3.7 3.8 4.1 3.9 3.9 3.0
Scheme of Presentation
Impact on India
Difference between US/Europe and India RBIs Policy Response and Impact Lessons from the Crisis Medium-term Issues and Challenges
External Commercial Borrowings (net) April- December Short-term Trade Credits (net) Total capital flows (net) Memo:
April- December
April- December
April- December
April- December April-December April-March
-15.5
9.0 76.1 110.5
-36.5
-33.4 -53.8 -57.7
8.8 10.5
28.4 40.2 2.7 16,569 40.24
2.8 9.7
6.4 17.9 6.0 12,366 45.92
April-December
April-March April-March April-March April-March April-March
Scheme of Presentation
Global Financial Crisis Impact on India Difference between US/Europe and India RBIs Policy Response and Impact Lessons from the Crisis Medium-term Issues and Challenges
No subprime No toxic derivatives No bank losses threatening capital No bank credit crunch No mistrust between banks
Temporary impact on MFs/NBFCs (Sept-Oct) Reduction in flow from non-banks Perceptions of credit crunch
Fiscal stress
Oil, Fertiliser, Food subsidies Pay Commission, Debt waiver, NRE Stimulus packages GFD/GDP ratio: 5.5-6.0% Large increase in market borrowings
Rs. crore 2008-09 BE Gross Net 1,76,453 1,13,000 2008-09 RE 3,42,769 3,29,649 2009-10 BE 3,98,552 3,08,647
Differences Between Financial Crisis in US/Europe and India (4) Indias Approach to Managing Financial Stability (1)
Current account: Full, but gradual opening up Capital account and financial sector: More calibrated approach towards opening up.
Equity flows encouraged; debt flows subject to ceilings and some end-use restrictions.
Financial sector, especially banks, subject to prudential regulation both liquidity and capital. prudential limits on banks inter-bank liabilities in relation to their net worth; asset-liability management guidelines take cognizance of both on and off balance sheet items Basel II framework: guidelines issued. Dynamic provisioning NBFCs: regulation and supervision tightened - to reduce regulatory arbitrage.
Scheme of Presentation
Global Financial Crisis Impact on India Difference between US/Europe and India
RBIs Policy Response and Impact
Reduction in CRR (400 bps) & SLR (100 bps) Special Repo window under LAF for banks onlending to NBFCs, HFCs & MFS Special Refinance to banks without collateral Unwinding of MSS buyback/desequestering OMOs pre-announced calendar
Cut in repo (425 bps) and reverse repo (275 bps) rates.
MSS and CRR good, effective buffers of liquidity both absorption and injection
Dynamic provisioning
Measures ensuring orderly functioning of Indian financial markets Cumulative potential primary liquidity impact over Rs. 4,90,000 crore (9 % of GDP) Comfortable liquidity position since mid-November, 2008 LAF window in absorption mode. Call rate within LAF corridor since November 3, 2008 bottom of the corridor. Gradual reduction in deposit and lending rates of banks . Government yields: upward pressure from large market borrowing programme Proactive management by RBI MSS unwinding Enhanced and pre-announced calendar for OMOs
Call market All money markets @ Call market All money markets @ BSE Sensex
6 7
8 9 10 11
40.36 7.69
10.0 10.4 8.25-9.25 12.25-13.50
45.56 8.45
11.6 12.3 8.75-10.25 13.75-14.75
48.64 7.85
10.0 14.7 8.75-10.25 13.75-14.75
51.23 6.56
7.0 8.9 8.00-9.25 11.50-14.00
2 3
Rupees crore 2007-08 2008-09 4,44,807 4,14,902 3,35,698 7,80,505 2,64,138 6,79,040
7.6 6.0
7.9
8.7 7.3
7.7
11.0 9.5
9.8
Industrial workers
Scheme of Presentation
Global Financial Crisis Impact on India Difference between US/Europe and India RBIs Policy Response and Impact
Lessons from the Crisis
Capital buffers, dynamic provisioning Look for regulatory arbitrage incentives/ possibilities
Scheme of Presentation
Global Financial Crisis Impact on India Difference between US/Europe and India RBIs Policy Response and Impact Lessons from the Crisis
Medium-term Issues and Challenges
Medium-term Issues and Challenges (1) Macroeconomic Indicators at a Glance (Per cent)
1 1950-51 to 1964-65 2 1965-66 to 1980-81 3 1980s 4 1990-91 5 1991/92 to 1996-97 6 1997/98 to 2002/03 7 2003/04 To 2007/08 8
1. Real GDP Growth Agriculture Industry Manufacturing Services 2. Real GDCF/GDP 3. ICOR 4. Nominal GDCF/GDP
5. GDS/GDP
6. Saving-Investment Gap
-1.5 -0.7 -1.8 -3.2 -1.2 -0.4 -0.3 Continuing increase in real GDP growth - Interregnum during the 1970s Secular uptrend in domestic saving and investment -investment largely financed by domestic savings Continuation of growth in domestic savings necessary; fiscal prudence
Medium-term Issues and Challenges (3) Fiscal Policy (2) Sustained interest rate differential also connected with the existence of a persistent inflation differential with the rest of the world. A key challenge is to further reduce inflation expectations toward international levels.
Medium-term Issues and Challenges (6) External Sector (1) Optimal response to the large and volatile capital flows is a combination of (CGFS, 2009)
sound macroeconomic policies prudent debt management exchange rate flexibility effective management of the capital account accumulation of appropriate levels of reserves as self-insurance and development of resilient domestic financial markets combination is country-specific; no one size fits all.
External Sector (2) Indian policy approach to CAL Distinction between debt and equity flows Higher inflation and interest rates in India vis-a-vis advanced economies Liberalisation of debt flows can lead to arbitrage flows Ceilings on debt flows appropriate
Commercial banks robust Committee on Financial Sector Assessment (CFSA) Stability Assessment and Stress Testing Concerns about credit risk remain muted at present
Scenario - increase in NPA by:
Without Stress
CRAR (%) Mar-08 Sept08 13.0 12.5
Financial sector robust Monetary policy sufficient instruments, flexible Corporate sector not too leveraged second round of restructuring going on productivity gains Foreign direct investment buoyant Agriculture improving Growth domestically financed Indian economy should be able to recover fast and return to 9%+ growth path
Thank You