Terrorism 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

Political violenceno justificaiton Violence Social violence Conflict Martial engagement

States are created from violence Terrorism produces results Without terror there can be no revolution Cannot have just result without just means (aka just violence) Violence is a necessary requisite but to what end Terrorism is considered to be unjustit can be just so long as it is positive Every revolution has terrorismhow big, collateral victims All war is terrorism. Huntingtons clash of civilizations People that engage to violence and are considered terrorists because they are most likely form another civilization Greeks understood the world consisting of Greeks, barbarians (civilized to uncivilized) and Savages (originally uncivilized). Revolutions cannot happen in civilizations that are distant from us, because all those people engage in is violence and terrorism. We are consciencous beings Violence in a distant land that crosses over into our lands Western man is the last man standinghe must be the last man. 1993 end of cold warpeople trying to figure out what is going on. Hypothesis pg. 22 Clash is civilizational culturalwithout that clash we would have nothing to orient us. Not ideological or economical. Greatest division of mankind would be cultural.

Cultural fault lines are where we have to stop it. Cultural absolutism. There is no way to giving into a culture that is not yours. Cultures Western Latin American Confucian Japanese Islamic Hindu Slavic/Orthodox Possibly African? Pg. 25 basic differences Differences are inborn World is becoming smaller (globalization) Economic modernization and social change o Global socialization and modernization o Evisceration local identity and tribes o Given the fact that we have increasing differences the fault lines will become more conflicted and problematic and will present the source of conflict as we know it.