aT International Socialism, . 48 (1990) .

65
(1995) Paul McGarr X
.
D. Bensaid M Choregraphies chaotiques,
X M,
M .
.
X
.
K.
M . T.
I X
O X a . O G. Deleuze F. Guattari
T a: T X
.
, ,
, ,
. T X
, . T X
.3
, 1986 Royal Society,

.
H . A E

.
.
M : X
.
O . O
,
.
K , Descartes Newton
. T N .
O ,
, , ,
, .
H :
. T
. K
.
,
. H
. T
.
H . O


.
E

.
,
: H E
, R. Clausious K M. A
, .
H ,
.
, ,
.
Laplace,
. M
.
,
. -,
.
19 ,
H. Poincare O M O M (1892-99)

.4
O H. Poincare E M : A
,

. A ,
. A

. :
,
<201>H <201>.5
H 19 Sophia Kovalevskaya (
) ?
A. Liapunov.
H A.
Kolmogorov V. Arnold KAM.6
Poincare Gaston
Julia Pierre Fatou 1920 Benoit Mandelbrot
(fractal) .7
X ;
H
: D. Bohm I. Prigogine.
O David Bohm HA 1918, Berkeley
Princeton. T 1951,
E A-

A
K K. B
1950 B.
O David Bohm
K.
T 1952 Bohr Physical
Review : M
. E
. M D. Bohm
.
H Bohm .8
Bohm
. A

.
H , ,
. H
. , ,
,
.
M .
. A

.
Causality and Chance in Modern Physics9 D. Bohm

. K .
O
.
, . O
,
.
H
. ,

() () .
. T
.
Wholeness and the Implicate Order10 Bohm
(explicate order)
, (implicate order). E
Bohm ,
. H
(explicate order). Bohm
,
.
To 1917,
M Ilya Prigogine, X.

H I A
: , .
,
.
. , 2
,
, . ,
,
. O Clausius

.11

, Prigogine
( )
- .
, ,
( )
, Prigogine ,
X. O ,
, . T

: . M
. T
. :
.
O Prigogine : , ,
, .
O . O
, . O

.
K Prigogine ,
.
Prigogine: ,
.12
K , :
, . A
Prigogine : E,
,
.
To Prigogine
: ,
. H

.
O Prigogine T
X : H , . H
M
<201> O
<201>.13

H K. M . T
1850 ,
, .. E B.
H M ,
.
O 1 K 1867, K E 2
R. Clausius. O
K .
H . H
. H
M , o . X
,
K .
, .

.
,

.
X ,
, M
(, , ). A
,
.2 H M
.
Ian Stewart :14 O M
. A Newton
3 M 3
;, M 3 . H
, ,
.
M . E

.
A Popper, M
.
E , K, .
E Hegel
, M
X: <201>,
. , 2 3

15.
H M .
M
.

O T N
.
T T ,
1933-35. H : T
E Hegel. T
,
. T
E.
T .
, ,
.
A T
, ,
, , .
T, T ,
:
- ..
O T
,

.
, ,
-
. M

. H ,
, .16

T;
O ,
.

. O
. O
.
O

- .
M
;
;

.
T
. A
, :
, ,
.

O
, . T

.
H T E O E

.
M , ,
( )
( )
( ), ,
(). M , : H
. E
,
,
.

A oo
M X
. H
. X
.
H X
M. H X, ,
.
H E X . T
,
,

.

1. D. Beyerchen: Non-Linear Science and the unfolding of a new intellectual Vision, Papers in
Contemporary Studies, 6, 1989 M. Dresden: Chaos: A New Scientific Paradigm or Science by
Public Relations?, The Physics Teacher, 30, 1992
2. D. Bensaid: Marx l intempestif, Editions Fayard, Paris 1995
3. G. Deleuze and F. Guattari: What is Philosophy?, Verso, London 1995 ( : Quest-ce que la
philosophie? , Les Editions de Minuit, Paris 1991)
4. H. Poincare: Les Methodes Nouveles de la Mechanique Celeste, Vols. 1-3, Gauthiers-Villars, Paris
1892-99.
: E. K K. :
H. Poincare (1996),
.
5. H. Poincare: Science and Method (190

, A M Dover Pbl. 1958.

E A. Miller: Imagery in Scientific Thought, Part I: Studies in Comparative Epistemology, Poincare

and Einstein, MIT Press 1987
6. H P -
A. Witt
V. Arnold. O Witt, A A, 1937,
. E

.
7.
best seller J. Gleick: X: M E, K 1990.
Ian Percival: Chaos: a science for the real world, New Scientist,
21.10. 89
.
8. H D. Bohm
. T. K: H E E, 1983
J. Horgan: Last words of a quantum heretic, New Scientist, 27. 2. 93
9. D. Bohm: Causality and Chance in Modern Physics, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London 1984
10. D. Bohm: Wholeness and the Implicate
Order, ARK, London 1983
11. L. Sklar: Physics and Chance. Philosophical issues in the Foundations of Statistical Mechanics,
Cambridge University Press 1995
12 I. Prigogine: Les Lois du Chaos, Flammarion, Paris 1994
13. I. Prigogine & I. Stengers: T X, K 1986.
329-330 .
14. I. Stewart: ; H X, E. K 1991
15. A D. Ruelle: T X, E. K 1994. X O J.
Briggs & F. D. Peat: O , K 1991 Richard
Day: The emergence of Chaos from clasical Economic Growth, Quart. J. Econ. , May 1983
Irregular Growth Cycles, Amer. Econ. Rev. , June 1982. K
K A E. Mandel: Long Waves of Capitalist Development:
A Marxist Interpretation, Verso, London 1995. E Mandel
F. Louca: Turbulence in Economics: The Long historical perspective of the long waves of
capitalist development, Lisbon 1994
16. T
: K. : E K T, IAMO 1995.