You are on page 1of 2

MMTXT6

*** MicroMath Scientist Statistics Report ***

Model File Name :


Data File Name :
Param File Name :

D:\oral1.eqn
Untitled7
Untitled1

Goodness-of-fit statistics for data set:

Untitled7

Data Column Name:

C
Weighted
Unweighted
Sum of squared observations : 16046.4282
16046.4282
Sum of squared deviations : 585.681772
585.681772
Standard deviation of data : 6.98618740
6.98618740
R-squared :
0.963500801
0.963500801
Coefficient of determination :
0.909262802
0.909262802
Correlation :
0.965768504
0.965768504
Data Set Name:

Untitled7
Weighted
Unweighted
Sum of squared observations : 16046.4282
16046.4282
Sum of squared deviations : 585.681772
585.681772
Standard deviation of data : 6.98618740
6.98618740
R-squared :
0.963500801
0.963500801
Coefficient of determination :
0.909262802
0.909262802
Correlation :
0.965768504
0.965768504
Model Selection Criterion : 2.11407360
2.11407360
Confidence Intervals:
Parameter Name :
Estimate Value =
Standard Deviation =
95% Range (Univar) =
95% Range (S-Plane) =

KA
1.91337601
0.342408752
1.16733142
0.958885114

2.65942059
2.86786690

Parameter Name :
Estimate Value =
Standard Deviation =
95% Range (Univar) =
95% Range (S-Plane) =

A
0.166621590
0.0139101407
0.136313997
0.127845996

0.196929183
0.205397184

Variance-Covariance Matrix:
0.117243753
-0.00352281799 0.000193492016
/@8 " Arial899::;Z[vw    /0fg  0112LMde  

6&7rps#  ' L,


0(5
9>6
#$GHxy9:mnno    d nJ
Correlation Matrix:
1.00000000
-0.739628820
1.00000000
Residual Analysis:
-------------------------------------The following are normalized parameters with an expected value of 0.0. Valu
es are in units of standard deviations from the expected value.
The serial correlation is 2.20 which indicates a systematic non-random tren
d in the residuals.
Skewness is 3.51 indicating the likelihood of a few large positive residual
s having an unduly large effect on the fit.
Kurtosis is -0.15 which is probably not significant.
The weighting factor was 0.00 leading to a heteroscedacticity of -0.28 whic
h suggests an optimal weight factor for this fit of about -0.28
&@8
p# "'Arial
L,0("5
#=9>>6
?R@S~ "stArial
tudn*J++,d nJ

You might also like