Numen 58 (2011) 670

brill.nl/nu

A Methodology for a Deconstruction and Reconstruction of the Concepts Shaman and Shamanism
Lars Kirkhusmo Pharo

Postdoctoral-Fellow in History of Religions, e Research Council of Norway Research Associate, Moses Mesoamerican Archive, Harvard University Research Associate, Institute for Signifying Scriptures, Claremont Graduate University l.k.pharo@ikos.uio.no & l.k.pharo@gmail.com

Abstract Scholars routinely confront the problem of translating concepts from one cognitivelinguistic system to another. e concepts shaman and shamanism, which are employed particularly in comparative religious and anthropological studies, are a case in point. Scholars from various academic disciplines make use of dierent, indistinct, and indeed contradictory denitions of these terms. As a result, their content and meaning have been obscured. My aim in this article is to emphasize the importance of establishing comparative religious concepts as methodical research tools. In particular, I call attention to the need to distinguish between emic (indigenous) concepts and etic (constructed by the scholar) comparative ideal types (Max Weber) in cultural and religious studies. rough the methodology of constructing theoretical analytical notions advocated in this essay, scholars can identify similarities and dissimilarities between assorted phenomena by focusing on what Henri Hubert and Marcel Mauss called caracteristiques direntielles. I argue that the fundamental spatial feature which distinguishes shamans from other categories of religious specialists is their unique command of ritual techniques that enable them to move between human and preternatural space, e.g., from the mundane world to the supernatural one and back again. Moreover, I contend that shamanism is not a religion in itself but only a conguration (ke Hultkrantz) within a religious system. is point is important because numerous scholars tend to reduce so-called indigenous religions to the category of shamanism, thereby depriving these religions of their individual identity. Instead, these religions ought to be recognized and analyzed as distinct systems of belief and practice, just as Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, Islam, and Judaism are. e paradigmatic post-colonial reduction of many indigenous religious systems to shamanism has created an impoverished view of religions that are no less complex and sophisticated than the so-called Great Traditions.
Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2011 DOI: 10.1163/156852711X540087

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

Keywords denition of shaman and shamanism, shamanism as a religious system, translation of concepts of various religious and cultural systems, methodology of constructing analytical comparative concepts, indigenous religious systems

Introduction In their article e Role of Shamanism in Mesoamerican Art, Cecelia F. Klein, Eulogio Guzmn, Elisa C. Mandell, and Maya Staneld-Mazzi (2002) question the use of the concept of shamanism by scholars in Mesoamerican studies.1 Claiming that they are addressing an essential problem concerning a Post-Colonial denition of the other, they argue that many Mesoamerican scholars misinterpret and misuse this term,2 and they call for . . . a more rened, more nuanced terminology that would distinguish, cross-culturally, among the many dierent kinds of roles currently lumped together under the vague and homogenizing rubric of shaman, otherwise the term should be discarded from Mesoamerican studies (Klein et al. 2002:400). One commentator, Christopher Chippendale, rightly notes that every word within a given language might be torpedoed in the same manner as Klein et al. torpedo the notions of shaman and shamanism (Klein et al. 2002:402). No neutral words exist in a language. Ultimately, according to this logic, language constitutes a meaningless tool for describing reality. Evidently, this is far from Chippendales view, but he fails to propose a methodology for dening comparative analytic notions satisfactorily. His argument does, however, indicate a serious problem with the deconstructive strategy advocated by Klein and her coauthors.
e essay derives from a theoretical chapter in my dissertation for the Norwegian Magistergrad (Pharo 2001, equivalent to a Ph.D. dissertation). ere I analyze the Maya and Nahua concepts way, nawalli, tona/tonal/tonalli and the theoretical categories shamanism, nagualism, tonalism, soul(s), and ritual impersonation. A revised English version of the dissertation is being prepared with the title Transformations, Manifestations and Identity: An Analysis of the Concepts of Shamanism, Nagualism, Ritual Impersonation, and Tonalism in Mesoamerican Religions (Pharo forthcoming). 2) Cf. Klein et al. 2002 for a survey of and the historical background to the introduction of the concept of shamanism into Mesoamerican art history.
1)

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

In what follows I shall suggest a strategy for constructing a redenition or rather for reconstructing the notions of shaman and shamanism as analytical concepts within the eld of comparative religious studies. e same methodology can also be used to (re)dene other comparative cultural and religious concepts,3 because even if the notion is lacking in a language of a particular culture, the matter might be present.4 It is important to note that I am conceiving of the terms shaman and shamanism in relation to the discipline of history of religions/religious studies. us, I am not conning my argument to Mesoamerican art history, as Klein et al. do. I am also concerned with religious systems in other parts of the world. Already in 1903, Arnold van Gennep observed that the eld of the history of religions suered from a lack of well-dened comparative concepts:
La terminologie de la science des religions est encore si peu xe, les notions dont elle traite sont tellement complexes et leur tude si peu dbrouille quil est ncessaire de nemployer chaque mot destin dsigner un ensemble de coutumes et de croyances quen lui donnant le sens le plus exact possible. Du temps o la science des religions ne stait point encore aranchie de lhistoire en gnral nous sont rests un certain nombre de ces termes fort vagues et qui sappliquent tout ce quon veut. . . . . ou mme rien du tout; dautres ont t crs par les voyageurs, adopts ensuite sans rexion par les dilettantes de lethnopsychologie et employs aussi tort et travers. Parmi ces mots vagues, lun des plus dangereux est celui de Chamanisme. (Van Gennep 1903:51)5

I have previously argued for a similar strategy for the problematic notion religion (Pharo 2007). 4) is constitutes a paraphrase of the statement, Even if the notion is lacking, the matter may be present (Bleeker 1973: 66). 5) Hubert and Mauss write in agreement with Van Gennep: Jusqu prsent, lhistoire des religions a vcu sur un bagage dides indcises. Elle est dj riche de faits authentiques et instructifs, qui fourniront, un jour, une abondante matire la science des religions. Mais ces faits sont classs au hasard, sous des rubriques imprcises; souvent mme, leur description est gte par les vices du vocabulaire. Les mots de religion et de magie, de prire et dincantation, de sacrice et dorande, de mythe et de lgende, de dieu et desprit, etc sont employs indiremment les uns pour les autres. La science des religions na pas encore de nomenclature scientique. Elle a toute bnce commencer par en arrter une (Hubert and Mauss 19021903:12).
3)

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

Regrettably, the situation has not improved in the time since Van Gennep wrote these words. is is especially true of the terms shaman and shamanism, which Van Gennep singled out in the quotation above. It is indeed a predicament that representatives not only of Mesoamerican studies but also of a wide variety of scholarly disciplines employ the concepts shaman and shamanism in diverse, indistinct, and often contradictory ways. e content and meaning of these notions have accordingly been obscured. ke Hultkrantz has noted that a substantial confusion regarding the meaning of shamanism has existed for a long time. is is lamentable not only because it is one of the most frequently used terms in religious studies but also . . . because we can hardly abandon the term (Hultkrantz quoted in Kettunen 1998:2).6 Consequently, scholars should not simply deconstruct or criticize the use of central (religious) concepts such as shamanism; they must also develop a strategy for (re)dening or reconstructing these concepts. Within a comparative discipline such as the history of religions, it is essential to employ a terminology that is dened unambiguously. Despite this fact, many historians of religions, anthropologists, and scholars from other disciplines have neglected this important theoretical task. As we shall see, several denitions of the notion of shaman have been proposed, based on various methodologies and empirical data. e many perspectives that have ensued from the numerous eorts at dening a religious specialist7 as a shaman have most certainly contributed to confusion about the meaning of the term. An enormous literature exists on the subject of shamanism, but the number of theoretical positions that appear within it is quite limited. Most of the publications about the supposed phenomenon of shamanism represent regional eldwork studies conducted in particular localities in the northern regions of Europe and Asia. But in order to conduct such empirical studies the scholar has to have a clear notion of what this religious phenomenon and this type of religious specialist are. Many of the available studies are valuable; but at the same time I venture to claim that there are no comparative treatments treatments that are
Cf. Hultkrantz (1998) and Znamenski (2007) for an overview of the study of shamanism. 7) I apply the concept religious specialist as a common denominator for priest, prophet, shaman, medicine man, calendar specialist, diviner, and so forth.
6)

10

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

not conned to one or two major regions which examine this concept critically, in combination with a critical overview of the various theoretical positions and strategies that may be employed in dening this religious phenomenon (cf. Francfort, Hamayon, and Bahn 2001; Hamayon 1994; Humphrey 1994; Hutton 2001; Vitebsky 2001a; 2001b; Znamenski 2004; cf. also, for instance, the recent studies in Pentikinen 1998a; Pentikinen and Simoncscis 2005; Humphrey and Onon 1996; as well as Pentikinen 1998b; Sidky 2008;8 Winkelman 1990, 1992, 2000). In addition, a comparative religious terminology that includes the terms shaman and shamanism has not been proposed. e theoretical analysis that follows will discuss and redene, or rather deconstruct and reconstruct, the etic concepts shaman and shamanism within the eld of the history of religions. I contend that the shaman must be classied according to his or her special religious techniques. is is not done, for instance, by Michael Winkelman, who stresses, based upon cross-cultural statistical data (which are impossible to substantiate empirically), what he calls the biologically based altered-state-of-consciousness potentials of certain individuals (Winkelman 1990:308).9 Furthermore, I caution against denitions that are too broad, such as those previously suggested by Hultkrantz (1973, 1978) and, more recently, by Piers Vitebsky. e latter writes that the category of shaman . . . includes any kind of person who is in control of his or her state of trance, even if this does not involve a soul journey . . . (Vitebsky 2001a:10). is denition applies to too many religious specialists and consequently does not serve any purpose. As an alternative, I suggest that we dene shaman and shamanism as follows:
e shaman is a religious specialist who, in the context of a ritual, has the ability to travel to a non-human (supernatural) world, to have direct communication with supernatural beings (deities, spirits etc.) there, and then to return to the human world. A supernatural world constitutes a space that ordinary human beings, i.e., individuals who lack a special gift and esoteric knowledge, cannot normally reach during their lifetimes. Supernatural (non-human) space does not
8) 9)

I thank Miguel Astor Aguilera for making me aware of Sidky 2008. Cf. also Winkelman 1992:47.

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

11

necessarily denote an upper or a lower world; it can also refer to other culturally dened spatial categories to which humans ordinarily have no access. However, shamanism presupposes that the soul or some kind of substance residing in the body of a human being10 can leave the body in order to travel to these supernatural regions during various types of unconsciousness (dream, sleep, or illness). is travel is dangerous, because the non-religious specialist does not know the geography of the supernatural world or may have been abducted by hostile preternatural beings, and therefore the soul may not return. In these cases the soul has to be rescued from the non-human zones by a religious specialist, i.e., the shaman. e preternatural voyage of the shaman is accordingly undertaken for the benet of other individuals or the community.

is denition accentuates a fundamental spatial dimension of shamanism, which consists of religious techniques or abilities to enter regions to which other people have no admittance or with which they are not familiar. Furthermore, it is crucial to emphasize that the exceptional religious practice and faculty mastered by the shaman may be only one of many ritual techniques found within a religious system. erefore, the religious system of a given culture cannot be classied using the reductionist category shamanistic. Shamanism merely represents one aspect or conguration (Hultkrantz 1978:11) within the religious system of a culture, not its entirety. e concepts shaman and shamanism are not essentialist terms but analytic notions constructed by the scholar in order to compare the dierences and similarities of various religious systems. e shaman moves from human to non-human space, but this space does not need to have three cosmic zones, heaven, earth, and underworld, nor is the shamans journey necessarily made possible by the assistance of auxiliary spirits, as the historians of religions Mircea Eliade and Hultkrantz maintain (Eliade 1968:2223, 88, 90, 215; Hultkrantz 1978:1112). ere is great variation from one religious system to the next regarding the details of the spatial travel of this category of religious specialist. A stringent and proven procedure for arriving at the denition of concepts is absent in the theoretical literature about shamanism. I am suggesting a method for dening comparative religious concepts which does not follow Eliades notion of a historical shaman (Eliade 1961)
A transcultural use of the concept soul is of course problematic, but it is here applied as a substance which resides within the body of a being.
10)

12

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

but proposes instead a strategy for constructing such concepts as ideal types. Barbara Tedlock laments that the existence of female shamans has been underestimated in the scholarly literature, in particular by Eliade, who apparently had the disadvantage of never having met a shaman through eld research (Tedlock 2005:6364). e issue, however, is not about doing eld research per se, but about operating with clearly dened analytical comparative concepts when doing eld research.11 ese cannot be established solely on the basis of working in one or two communities in a certain region, but they also require the employment of a coherent methodology.Tedlock has recently outlined ve features of shamanism (Tedlock 2005:2024), but they do not exhibit such a methodology. For instance, she does not explain the origin of the notion that shamanistic practitioners share the conviction that all entities, animate or otherwise, are imbued with a holistic life force, vital energy, consciousness, soul, spirit, or some other ethereal or immaterial substance that transcends the laws of classical physics (Tedlock 2005:20). It is problematic that Tedlock does not explain how she arrived at this designation of a particular type of religious specialist, a designation which is not particularly clear. is lack of method in constructing concepts is, however, quite common in the anthropological literature. e anthropologist H. Sidky wants to sort out the problem of dening shamanism by means of empirical knowledge, i.e., through eld research (Sidky 2008: 39). Because of the excellent material on shamanistic practices in Nepal, Sidky contends that one can productively address many of the central issues in the discourse on shamanism, including the problem of denition . . . on that basis (Sidky 2008: 23). But how can apparently exceptional data from a particular region provide a methodology for dening or, more precisely, constructing analytical concepts? I do not understand why Sidky and many of his
11) Even under my narrow denition of shamanism, female shamans can be seen to exist in many religious systems around the world. ey were, for example, found in pre-Christian Scandinavian cultures, among the Abkhaz in the Caucasus and the Koryak in Eastern Siberia (Hultkrantz 1973:32), and in the Tungus tribe. ey still exist on the island of Sumatra, as Tedlock herself mentions (Tedlock 2005:73), albeit not based on her own eld research, but by referring to the work of Enid Nelson and Ruth Inge Heize (Tedlock 2005:299, note 33).

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

13

fellow anthropologists insist on distorting brilliant eld research and reports by employing these concepts in their analyses of religion. Inspired by Eliade, Juha Pentikinen denes a shaman as principally a traveler and mediator between . . . the real world, where the shamans family and community members live, and the spiritual world of the gods, the deceased, guardian spirits, and other mystical creatures (Pentikinen 1998a:31). But like Tedlock and Sidky, Pentikinen does not make clear how he comes to such a denition of shaman and shamanism, other than employing various data and terms from cultures from northern Asia and Europe, in particular Siberia. Another interesting question is why the term shaman enjoys such popularity among scholars when, as Pentikinen comments, many indigenous people of North America reject the categorization of their religion as shamanistic. He quotes the Mescalero Apache professor of religious studies, Ins M. Talamantez:
ey raped us by taking away our language. Now they are stealing our religion by calling our medicine men shamans and by telling stories about how you can become a shaman by taking drugs. Our language does not know shamans, and that name is used only by neo-shamans; not our changers. (Pentikinen 1998a:44)

As Talamantez clearly states, not every culture appreciates the undoubtedly questionable privilege of being classied as shamanistic. So how by which method can scholars characterize certain religious specialists as shamans without the peril of reductionism? In what follows I shall argue in favor of a methodology by which scholars may construct not only the notions of shaman and shamanism but also comparative, analytical religious and cultural concepts in general. Methodology: e Strategy of Constructing Concepts as Ideal Types

e Tungus (also known as Evenki) word saman or xaman, from which the term shaman is derived, is among the most frequently used emic12
It was the linguist Kenneth L. Pike who adapted and rened the terms emic and etic as Propp had used them and as they had become used by formalists thereafter. Pikes use really just renames the earlier esoteric/exoteric or s/x factors that William
12)

14

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

notions in the history of religions and anthropology. Other examples, historical or contemporary, are fetish from the Portuguese Congo, mana from Melanesia, tabu from Polynesia, totem (dotem) from the Ojibwa in North America, and potlatch from the North West coast of North America. ese and other concepts were uncritically employed as comparative notions in anthropology until they fell into disrepute with the abandonment of reductionist evolutionary theory during the 1920s. Since that time, scholars have called attention to the semantic problems of taking words out of their original linguistic, religious, and cultural contexts in order to give them a universal meaning (cf. the quotation from Van Gennep above). It therefore seems relevant to ask whether regional or emic words from a particular non-Western culture may be utilized in comparative terminology. In most cases scholars write about foreign cultures using a language dierent from that of the people they study. ey are therefore compelled to translate central religious and cultural concepts of the culture on which they do research. When no conscious strategy of constructing comparative concepts has been established, the translation of concepts causes serious semantic problems. It is essential to acknowledge that every comparative discipline, such as the history of religions and anthropology, must utilize an apparatus of comparative concepts, theories, and methods in order to interpret and systematically analyze its objects of study. Cultural and religious analyses done without a philological methodology and without knowledge of the language of the culture studied have no credibility. General concepts have both a classifying and an interpretive function. Only after appropriate translation and classication can a scholar carry out an analysis of a phenomenon. But what kind of method and theory can be utilized to create comparative concepts? I advocate a methodological strategy of constructing transcultural concepts by consciously formulating ideal types.13
Hugh Jansen had put forward (Anonymous reviewer, 2009) derived from phonemic and phonetic. Etic refers to the transcultural or the comparative, whereas emic alludes to the specic or indigenous (Pike 1954; 1999). I employ these notions to separate comparative from indigenous concepts and classications. 13) e following outline of the notion of ideal type is drawn from my article concerning the concept of religion, Pharo 2007.

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

15

Shaman is a Western cultural category; it ts within a tradition that has developed a secularized conception of religion as a distinct cultural phenomenon. Notions such as shaman, religion, culture, history, literature, politics, ritual, art, and so forth are incorporated into a meta-language, i.e., a language that describes another language. e history of religions, like other systematic disciplines, has its own meta-language or terminology for use in producing general interpretations and analyses of religious systems. Shaman is a comparative or transcultural analytic concept, derived from indigenous theological terms, which has been translated into and incorporated within the meta-language of the history of religions. Hence the scholar faces a problem of translation in the study of other cultures. A conscious strategy for constructing concepts is essential for creating truly useful etic notions in a scientic meta-language. e concept of shaman is a cultural category which only gives meaning if, like other transcultural notions, it is dened as what Max Weber called an ideal type (Idealtypus). An ideal type is a general concept which does not have an actual empirical realization. Weber writes: It is not a description of reality but it aims to give unambiguous means of expression to such a description (Weber 1969:90). An ideal type is created by abstracting an essential similarity or similarities from particular phenomena or objects, their distinctive traits. Such ideal types or analytical typologies enable scholars to outline similarities, connections, and dierences among individual objects, individuals, phenomena, and so forth, irrespective of time or place.
. . . those ideas which govern the behaviour of the population of a certain epoch i.e., which are concretely inuential in determining their conduct, can if a somewhat complicated construct is involved, be formulated precisely only in the form of an ideal type, since empirically it exists in the minds of an indenite and constantly changing mass of individuals and assumes in their minds the most multifarious nuances of form and content, clarity and meaning. (Weber 1969:9596)

In order to provide meaning and enhance our understanding of cultural phenomena, it is imperative that these categorizations and classications be formulated and employed in a precise manner. An erroneous and inaccurate cultural analysis has unfortunate consequences. It obscures the perception of empirical data and thereby results in a

16

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

misguided interpretation of them. If phenomena or objects elude classication, the scholar should always draw attention to this fact. It is my contention that we cannot avoid making use of ideal types as analytical tools in the history of religions. Although some scholars deny that they employ ideal types in their research, language itself forces them to do so, whether consciously or unconsciously.14 It is therefore extremely important to be attentive to the applications of concepts as ideal types. Historians of religions confront challenges of denition not only in the case of shamanism but also in the case of many other religious comparative concepts, which must also be demarcated unambiguously. In order to avoid semantic problems, terms such as soul, deity, religious specialist, priest, mana, totem, and religion15 must be formulated and dened as ideal types.16 e overused notions shaman and shamanism are extraordinarily good examples of the inated use of meaningless concepts because previous scholarship has lacked a clear idea of their semantic value. In this respect, the history of religions can learn from sociology and linguistics, scientic disciplines that have a tradition of employing clearly dened analytical, transcultural concepts. Scholars must, however, be critical and careful when they construct and apply abstract concepts, particularly when they are studying a non-Western culture. A theoretical classication risks obscuring characteristics of the religious system under investigation. When using universal concepts in the exploration of a specic culture or religion, scholars should always consider and include the corresponding word from the language of that culture. In this manner scholars can make explicit nuances of meaning and modify the ideal type. Hence, scholars

14) If the historian (in the widest sense of the word) rejects an attempt to construct such ideal types as a theoretical construction, i.e., as useless or dispensable for his concrete heuristic purposes, the inevitable consequence is either that he consciously or unconsciously uses other similar concepts without formulating them verbally and elaborating them logically or that he remains stuck in the realm of the vaguely felt (Weber 1969:94). 15) Cf. Pharo 2007 on dening the concept religion. 16) e greater the need however for a sharp appreciation of the signicance of a cultural phenomenon, the more imperative is the need to operate with unambiguous concepts which are not only particularly but also systematically dened (Weber 1969:93).

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

17

operate with language at two levels, the universal and the regional, and they must give attention to both. In addition to employing ideal types, historians of religions must include the words for the phenomena in the culture under study; i.e., they must utilize both etic and emic concepts. e similarities in phenomena from various religions (which it is the task of a comparative discipline like the history of religions to identify) must not obscure the dierences. If scholars ignore this fact, they run the peril of obscuring and simplifying reality, which is not only scientically unfortunate but also unfair as well as insulting to the people being studied. Comparative concepts are only tools for formulating interpretations and gaining deeper understanding. An ideal type is never an end in itself (Weber 1969:201202). One must always be on guard against distorting empirical data to make them t into a theory or a conceptual apparatus. e methodology for constructing transcultural theoretical analytical notions advocated in this study should enable scholars to identify similarities and dissimilarities within various religious phenomena. It attempts to locate the caracteristiques direntielles (Hubert and Mauss 19021903) of the comparative concepts in order to construct ideal types (Weber 1969). When a theoretical denition of a phenomenon is sought, it is essential not only to emphasize what distinguishes it from other phenomena but also to identify one or several analogies from various cultures and historical epochs. Where observable facts appear to share essential qualities, scholars can operate with an ideal type. Because it is constructed, however, an ideal type will never be nally dened within a discipline of cultural studies but it will constantly be subjected to critical scrutiny. How, then, can shaman be dened as an ideal type? In accordance with the method of deconstructing and reconstructing the term, it can be done by addressing three questions: 1. What is the origin of the word shaman, and what did this term represent in its original cultural and religious context? 2. In what manner have shaman and shamanism been employed as analytical comparative concepts by various researchers within dierent scholarly disciplines? 3. What traits distinguishing the shaman from other types of religious specialists can be identied in order to transform this concept into an ideal type?

18

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

eoretical Denitions of Shamanism In order to answer the rst two questions, I will give an overview of various theoretical positions concerning the denition of shamanism. As already mentioned, a vast scholarly literature has been, and is currently being, produced on the topic of shamanism. I have therefore made a selection of the most central (and classic) works to represent the principal theoretical positions. e Notion of the Shaman as a Religious Specialist in So-Called Primitive Cultures In the history of religions and anthropology the term shaman has become a common denominator for religious specialists in indigenous traditions outside the Western cultural sphere, particularly in so-called primitive cultures. e predominant view among specialists on shamanism has been that the shaman can only exist in simple communities, i.e., in nomadic cultures based on hunting, shing, and gathering. As we shall see, anthropologists have developed a predilection for the dichotomy shaman versus priest when describing religious specialists operating in non-Western cultures. In this model, shaman designates a primitive religious specialist living in allegedly simple tribal communities whereas the priest is a religious specialist in hierarchically organized (e.g., self-styled civilized) urban societies. Many scholars claim that the locus classicus of shamanism consists of small-scale hunting and nomadic cultures in Northern and Central Asia (Eliade 1968; Gilberg 1984; Hultkrantz 1978; Ohlmarks 1939). Others argue that shamans basically have the greatest inuence in societies with a simple social and political structure. e more primitive the cultural level, the more important the shaman is in the community, according to Alfred Kroeber.17 Interestingly, Wilhelm Schmidt put forth quite the opposite argument. He writes in Der Ursprung der Gottesidee (19121955) that the non-ecstatic white shamanic symbolic journey to heaven is a result of a southern matriarchal agricultural economy (Hultkrantz 1989:45). e original ecstatic form of shamanism, which he calls black shamanism,
17)

e Religion of the Indians of California (1907:327, quoted in Hultkrantz 1989: 4546).

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

19

e.g., the journey to the world of the dead, has its place of origin in Central Asia (Eliade 1961:156).18 Lszl Vajda maintains that Siberian shamanism had its foundation in the meeting between ancient hunting cultures in the north and the high cultures in the south, which gradually invaded the northern regions (Vajda 1964:295).19 Eliade agrees with Vajda. According to him, shamanism in the north was inuenced not only by Buddhism and Lamaism but also by cultures in the Middle East (Eliade 1968:389). Eliade argues that the ritual of the shaman is rst and foremost an ancient technique in primitive cultures (1968). He claims that the shaman has a long history. His or her archaic technique, which came into being in prehistoric Paleolithic cultures, has nevertheless undergone changes in the course of time (Eliade 1968:27). is is partly in agreement with Hultkrantzs historical theory of shamanism, according to which the phenomenon constitutes a heritage from Paleolithic hunting and gathering cultures (Hultkrantz 1973:35). e position of the shaman was weakened but retained in pastoral societies. In more complex agricultural communities shamanism disappeared and was later replaced by more advanced religious systems such as Buddhism and Lamaism (Hultkrantz 1989:4749). Hence, in highly complex, organized societies shamanism as an ideological and ritual system collapsed. Nevertheless, in the Arctic and the sub-Arctic regions shamanism has kept most of its original archaic elements and has a social structure that is typical for cultures in which the religious specialists are shamans. According to Hultkrantz these are basically individualistic, predominantly bilateral hunting societies (Hultkrantz 1973:35, 37; 1989:47).20 Both Hultkrantz, in his study of soul beliefs among the Indians of North America (1953), and Ivar Paulson, in his investigation of the
is distinction is, however, not universal, writes Eliade: Central Asiatic and Siberian shamans know the ascension to heaven as well as the descent to the netherworld, although there are also specialists in these two types of ecstatic voyages (Eliade 1961:156). 19) Cf. also Shirokogoro 1935:279, 282. 20) Shamanism deteriorated in agrarian societies where sacred rulers and priests took over many shamanic functions. In the emerging grand-scale civilizations shamans operated on the family level, but gradually their art got lost. In nomadic societies, however, and particularly in North Asia where reindeer nomadism spread, shamans retained their inuence (Hultkrantz 1978:2730; 1989:47).
18)

20

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

belief in the soul in North Eurasia (1958), assert that shamanism is typical of regions where there is a belief in a double soul, that is, the belief in the existence of a free soul and a body soul. On this view, soul-dualism is an ideological precondition for the idea that the soul can undertake a journey and therefore for shamanism (Hultkrantz 1984:29). Hultkrantz writes: Where shamanism is strong, so is souldualism; where shamanism is weak, so is soul-dualism (Hultkrantz 1973:33). He also sees a dualistic notion of the soul as symptomatic of primitive cultures (Hultkrantz 1953:24).21 Conversely, soul-monism is characteristic of more developed cultures (Arbman 1927:9092; Bremmer 1983; Hultkrantz 1953:2324, 108114; 1973:34; Paulson 1958). For instance, in the indigenous high cultures of North America the monistic concept of the soul dominates (Hultkrantz 1953:144). is is an indication that shamanism does not exist in high cultures. Another sign of an absence of shamanism in so-called high cultures is that in non-stratied societies the shaman does not have to compete with other types of religious specialists (Gilberg 1984:2325). Simple nomadic cultures are more exposed to adversity than more advanced agricultural societies. e shaman frequently operates in unstable societies or crisis-prone societies, where war, hunger, extreme climate, disease, and so forth are the norm (Gilberg 1984:2526; Siikala 1978:15). Some scholars have maintained, however, that despite the fact that the shaman has disappeared from cultures with a dierentiated hierarchical socio-political structure, one can still nd traces of shamanism in high cultures.22 ke Ohlmarks believed he had identied shamanistic elements in various cultures and religions: in Scythia and Iran, narcotic shamanism (the smoking of hemp) in India, the use of narcotic drinks in China, exorcism, the imitative journey of the soul by the dervish in Islam, in Buddhism, and elsewhere (Ohlmarks 1939:157170). As has been noted, Eliade admits that one can nd traces of the ideology of the shaman in advanced cultures, but, he states, these cannot be considered to be shamanistic (Eliade 1968:2324). Because shamanism is an original phenomenon (un phnomne originaire) in the history of
But there are many primitive cultures where there are no traces of a dualism of the soul (Hultkrantz 1973:30). 22) We recall the argument by Schmidt.
21)

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

21

humanity, it has, according to Eliade, undergone changes in dierent cultures. Shamanic elements like myths, symbols, ecstatic rituals, institutions, and so forth have survived in more developed civilizations. But they no longer constitute a dominating force in the religious system, since shamanism has lost its supreme position in the higher developed cultures, which are inuenced by urban and agricultural values (Eliade 1968:298299, 392). One set of examples comprises the Indo-European high cultures that are not shamanistic but have kept certain features of shamanism. ese societies have only retained une structure chamanique (Eliade 1968:267). Moreover, a concept of (maledominant) shamanism in hunter-gatherer cultures has recently been proposed by Vitebsky, suggesting that this theoretical position has not lost its ground in contemporary scholarship.23 On the background of these arguments it would be surprising to nd shamanism in an ostensible high culture, i.e., an urban culture, with a dierentiated and hierarchical structure.24 But is there a natural law that shamanism cannot appear outside small-scale nomadic hunting and gathering cultures? Anna-Lena Siikalas study of shamanism in Siberia and in the interior of Asia modies the deterministic civilization theory that suggests that there can only be shamans in so-called primitive nomadic hunting and gathering cultures. Siikala asserts that she has located shamanism in both huntingbased, small-clan communities in North Asia as well as in South Asia, where there are communities with a complex social structure and an agricultural economy. In this cultural context the shaman functions as a sacricial priest, according to Siikala (Siikala 1978:24). Roberte N. Hamayons study of cultures in Siberia similarly leads her to identify both hunting shamanism and pastoral shamanism in that region (Hamayon 1994:7778). It is, however, how the scholar denes the shaman in his or her role as a religious specialist that determines the cultural, historical, and geographical dissemination of shamanism. is premise is fundamental to the employment of analytical concepts in categorizing cultural and
Cf. Tedlock 2005:6465. is has, however, not bothered numerous scholars who have dened the urban Classic Maya culture as shamanistic. Cf., for instance, the inuential book, Maya Cosmos: ree ousand Years on the Shamans Path (Freidel, Schele, and Parker 1993).
23) 24)

22

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

religious phenomena. For instance, Laurel Kendalls claim that shamanism exists and was supported by the state in modern South Korea cannot be corroborated. Kendall maintains that the mansin who masters supernatural powers, is sanctioned by the community or state, and can enter a state of culturally acknowledged trance constitutes a shaman (Kendall 1987:2829). But Kendall does not formulate a methodology that allows her to set up such a broad denition. us, her data cannot substantiate a theory of shamanism existing in advanced (modern state) societies. Caroline Humphrey provides interesting data which corroborate my argument that this type of religious specialist is not restricted to certain cultural systems. In the twelfth and thirteenth centuries, in an aristocratic state founded by the Mongols, certain individuals were said to be able to ascend to the sky (Humphrey 1994:201202, 204). In the twentieth century a Mongolian-speaking agricultural people, the Daur, represented the lower world, named ukel-un gurun, the empire of death, as an urbanized state where the yadgan (i.e., the shaman) was able to travel (Humphrey 1994:217219). On this analysis, shamanism is not restricted to particular social and cultural systems nor is it reserved exclusively for a particular gender. An Etymological Denition We have already seen that there are some scholars who have doubted whether it is correct to employ shaman and shamanism as analytical concepts outside of their original cultural and historical contexts, namely, Siberia and Central Asia. Humphrey employs a rather confusing denition of shamanism, stating that . . . the term shaman is used for the specialists called by equivalent words in native languages, and shamanism refers to their practices and beliefs (Humphrey 1994:192). I. M. Lewis (1984, 1989) denes shaman according to the provenance of the word. Pentikinen proposes that Siberia is the cradle of shamanism, because the word saman comes from a Siberian language, although most Siberian languages and religions do not include the word (Pentikinen 1998a:30).25 Such an etymological approach to denition does not, however, constitute a satisfactory methodological strategy.
25)

Moreover, he writes that his perception of shamanism has changed dramatically

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

23

As mentioned earlier, the term shaman derives from the Tungus/ Evenki language.26 us, Lewis derives his notion of shaman from the saman as found among the Tungus people (Lewis 1989:4344), relying upon the account given in S. M. Shirokogoros classic study of the Tungus tribe from 1935, e Psychomental Complex of the Tungus. Shaman was rst understood by Russian explorers as denoting some kind of pagan sorcerer. It later became a general concept for specialists in the matter of spirits (Shirokogoro 1935:268). Shirokogoro writes that in all of the Tungus languages this term refers to persons of both genders who master spirits, which means that they can introduce spirits into themselves and use the power over these spirits in their own interest, particularly helping other people who suer from the spirits. In such a capacity they may possess a complex of special methods for dealing with the spirits (Shirokogoro 1935:269). is etymological method is not particularly helpful, because the Tungus and other linguistically related tribes of North Asia applied the term saman to various religious specialists (Shirokogoro 1935:271). Shirokogoro notes that both the ecstatic religious specialist and the clan religious specialist (or priest according to Shirokogoro) were called saman by the Tungus:
Yet, the Manchus used the institution of shamans for creation of a special kind of clan ocials dealing with the souls of dead clansmen. ese are poyun sman, poixun saman (Manchu), boigon saman (Manchu) who are not usually the shamans as they will be later treated, but who may be better regarded as clan ocials whose function is that of THE CLAN PRIESTS. (Shirokogoro 1935:218)

since meeting Siberian shamans . . . (Pentikinen 1998a:29). us, Siberian cultures apparently function as the model for the denition (Pentikinen 1998a:44). 26) is language is presently spoken by 10,000 of a total population of 30,000 Tungus. e Tungus live in the region from the northern part of the Baikal Sea to the area around the rivers Lena and Aldan in the eastern part of the middle of the Siberian high land (sibirskoye ploskogorye) and all the way to the Indigirska plains (Indigirskaya nizmenost) to the northeast (Kettunen 1998:1). e word shaman (derived from saman or xaman) was introduced into the Russian language in the middle of the 17th century by the religious specialist Avvakum, who lived in exile among the Tungus. He was the rst person to write about the Tungus (Kettunen 1998:1; Pentikinen 1998a:30). Many theories have been proposed about the etymology of the term shaman. For an overview cf. Voigt 1984; Kettunen 1998.

24

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

e Tungus and Manchu employed several words for the shamanistic ritual. Some of the terms for this ritual practice are derived from the root saman, but in a few dialects words so derived do not exist and are replaced instead by other, local words. Shirokogoro concludes that there is no special word or general notion that describes a shamanistic ceremony (Shirokogoro 1935:304). He emphasizes that he uses the word shaman as a terminus technicus in order to avoid confusion with sorcery, witchcraft, medicine men, etc. (Shirokogoro 1935:271).27 Consequently, there are many dierent names for the various religious specialists among the linguistic groups of North and Central Asia. is diversity makes it meaningless to dene shaman in terms of the words etymology (Siikala 1978:1).28 e designations shaman and shamanism the term shamanism being derived from shaman are thus constructions of Western anthropologists (Shirokogoro 1935:268269). e Tungus never employed the concept shamanism in their own language. It was used by Western anthropologists to describe a certain religious complex or ideology which they thought they had identied in Siberia and North Asia. Both George Foster and Claude Lvi-Strauss reached the same conclusion with regard to other local words that anthropologists have used to categorize non-Western religious systems. Totemism, writes Lvi-Strauss, does not exist. It is an illusion constructed by Western scholars in order to describe primitive religion (Lvi-Strauss 1962:25). Foster similarly states that Nagualism is not really a culture trait or complex at all; it is a word which does not per se exist (Foster 1944:87). In other words, it is by chance that Western scholars employ shaman as a scholarly term, when they could just as easily have used another word from the many languages in North and Central Asia. A Geographical Denition Because the word shaman (saman; xaman) originates from the Tungus tribe in the northeast of Central Asia, ethnographic data have been
e absence of the term saman will not prevent us from including the bearers of dierent terms into groups of shamans. us the term shaman will be used as a technical scientic term (Shirokogoro 1935:271). 28) Local terms prevail for shamans everywhere in Siberia and the earliest accounts usually imitate or quote foreign words (Voigt 1984:15).
27)

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

25

applied from this region in order to categorize this religious specialist. As mentioned above, northeastern Central Asia has been perceived as the locus classicus of shamanism (Vajda 1964:268; see also Hultkrantz 1973:27; Pentikinen 1998a:30). A debate has thus raged among scholars about whether shamanism can exist outside of this geographic zone. us, we must now enquire whether shamanism constitutes an authentic historical phenomenon that can only appear in a denite geographic area. Eliade asserts that shamanism stricto sensu is a phenomenon belonging to Siberia and Central Asia, since it is from this region that the word has its provenance and it is here that its morphology is best manifested (Eliade 1968:23). Nevertheless, Eliade admits that there are examples of this type of religious specialist outside Siberia and Central Asia (Eliade 1968:23). rough several ethnographic examples in his book Le Chamanisme et les techniques archaques de lextase (1968), Eliade makes the argument that shamanism as a phenomenon may exist in primitive cultures in every part of the world. Consequently, shamans gure in Australia, North and South America, Southeast Asia, India, Tibet, China, and elsewhere (Eliade 1961:151; 1968:2224). Hultkrantz agrees with Eliade that shamanism is not only limited to Siberia and Central and Northern Asia. He maintains, however, that shamanism never existed in Africa or Australia, but has only occurred in places where traces of an old Paleolithic culture have best survived: North and South America (particularly the Arctic North and southern South America), circumpolar Eurasia, Siberia and Mongolia, China, Korea, and Japan (Hultkrantz 1978:2730; 1989:47). Other theorists of shamanism operate with dierent geographic denitions. Luc de Heusch writes: In their purest forms shamanistic cults seem to be peculiar to Mongolian and Amerindian peoples, while authentic cults of possession are mostly typical of the black world in both Africa and America (de Heusch 1981:152). On the other hand, Vajda claims that shamans are religious specialists restricted to Siberia and North America (Vajda 1964:290). Siikala nds phenomenological similarities between shamans all over the world, but she strictly distinguishes between the authentic classical shamanism of Central Asia, Northern Siberia, and other Arctic regions, and shamanic features, elements, and ideas in cultures outside this region. is is because the broader the application of the term shamanism and the more varied the systems of rites

26

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

concerned, the more blurred the conceptual content becomes (Siikala 1978:14). Scholars cannot, according to Siikala, use the concept shaman to classify religious specialists outside of this region (Siikala 1978:1415). Without realizing that she is violating a regional (geographic) denition of shamanism, Siikala admits that there are important economic and cultural dierences between the many tribes in Siberia and Northeast Asia (Voigt 1977:387388).29 Siberia and Northeast Asia have been under considerable cultural and religious inuence from the south, particularly from Buddhism and Lamaism. ere are thus linguistic, cultural, economic, and religious dierences between the ethnic groups in the area that has been called the locus classicus of shamanism. Consequently, myths, symbols, ritual practices, religious institutions, and religious specialists vary considerably across Siberia and Northeast Asia. It therefore appears rather strange that Siikala can advocate a regional denition of shamanism. To classify the many religious systems of this culturally heterogeneous area as shamanistic can only be done at the cost of reductionism. A presupposed shamanistic religion for this enormous region with so many dierent cultures inevitably leads to disregard for other important elements of the religions of the diverse linguistic groups. In every culture there are religious specialists and religious phenomena that do not t a particular shamanistic denition. But Siikala does not specify the common features of this religious specialist (i.e., the shaman), as she should have done given that there are so many dierent cultural and religious traditions in the locus classicus of shamanism. Alice Beck Kehoe suggests that shamanism only exists in Siberia and in northern North America (Kehoe 2000:4; 8; 5270), but she does not identify the characteristics that distinguish this particular type of religious specialist, other than describing a basic divining ritual which, she admits, has many cultural variations.
29) e way of life of the Arctic sea-mammal hunters and reindeer breeders diers greatly from that of the steppe or the hunters and shermen of the taiga. It follows that despite certain basic similarities, the shamanic complexes are not uniform either. ere are variations in the shamans role in the community, as there are dierences, for example, in his ritual accessories or the tradition of beliefs he represents. Tracing the history of shamanism is thus a complicated matter (Siikala 1978:1).

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

27

Because there are many variations in the basic divining ritual, from region to region and also from practitioner to practitioner, the dierences between Siberians, generalized, and Inuit and American Indians, generalized, may be not much greater than between any two particular performances on one continent or the other. (Kehoe 2000:6768)

It appears that Kehoe does not want to employ the Tungus term shaman universally because it is confusing and misleading to use a simple blanket word, lifted from an unfamiliar Asian language, for a variety of culturally recognized distinct practices and practitioners (Kehoe 2000:53).30 But Kehoe does not take into account that European vocabulary (Kehoe 2000:52), as is generally the case for any language, incorporates numerous adapted loan words from other linguistic families. As advocated in this article, shaman should be employed as a technical term (ideal type) that comprises distinctive characteristic features. A Regional Psychological eory: Mental Disturbances and Arctic Hysteria

Owing to the fact that the label shaman has been associated with an ecstatic ritual specialist, several scholars have argued that a shaman is a mentally disturbed person.31 M.A. Czaplicka was one of the anthropologists at the beginning of the twentieth century who introduced the notion of Arctic hysteria.32 Arctic hysteria designates a psychological condition that resembles ecstasy. is mental state is, according to Czaplicka, the result of heritage. e shaman is accordingly in her view genetically conditioned. Relying upon the theory of Arctic hysteria, Ohlmarks asserts that genuine shamanism can only exist in the high Arctic region (Ohlmarks 1939:58). In his book Studien zum Problem des Schamanismus (1939)
In my view, it is inexplicable that Kehoe and fellow anthropologists employ the term priest in order to designate religious specialists of non-Christian religions. I do not believe that the Classic Maya had a concept of ritual priests, as Kehoe suggests (Kehoe 2000:79). A better translation would be ritual specialist or religious specialist, terms which do not carry Christian connotations. 31) Cf. Bogoras 19041909, Devereux 1956, Shirokogoro 1935, and Silverman 1967, all cited in Hultkrantz 1978:25, among other examples. See also Eliade 1968:37, n. 1, and Siikala 1978:21. 32) Czaplicka 1914, cited in Hultkrantz 1978:26.
30)

28

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

Ohlmarks gives an account of this regional psychological denition of shamanism. He claims that shamanism is not a religion, but eine Art Ekstatismus (Ohlmarks 1939:1), which can operate only in the high Arctic area (Ohlmarks 1939:38). Ohlmarks designates the hocharktische region, i.e., Siberia and North America, as the Urheimat des Schamanismus (Ohlmarks 1939:58). Allegedly, the climate and nature in this area inuence the mind and create the natural conditions for the Arctic hysteria of the shaman (Ohlmarks 1939:83). e symptoms of Arctic hysteria comprise nervousness, psychosis, and abnormal psychic reactions. is condition is epidemic in the Arctic region due to the climate. Both the polar night, with its cold, deserted darkness, and the lack of food and vitamins contribute to the psychic state of the shaman (Ohlmarks 1939:5). Ohlmarks emphasizes that this analysis does not imply that mental patients or people with chronic neurological disorders and shamans belong within one and the same category. e dierence between a shaman and an epileptic, for example, is that a shaman can enter into a trance voluntarily (Ohlmarks 1939:11). e boundary between Arctic and sub-Arctic shamanism is determined by the climate, temperature, population density, light, vegetation, and diet. As a result, there are different conditions of ecstasy in the north and in the south. In the northern Arctic area mental illness is more widespread (Ohlmarks 1939:15). e extreme climate in the north constitutes the necessary precondition for Arctic hysteria, the ecstasy that the shaman needs for his ritual. In the northern region the ritual of the shaman contains wild ecstasy and a soul journey to the supernatural world. Natural, organic, spontaneous shamanism can thus exist only here. e high Arctic region is the realm of the religious specialist whom Ohlmarks calls der grosse Schaman. is great shaman conducts sances with catalepsy, wherein he experiences a condition of unconsciousness. During this state he embarks on a soul journey to the other world. e sub-Arctic region does not have this extreme climate. Hence, spontaneous shamanism is not found there. Instead, der kleine Schaman, the little shaman, lives there. is little shaman is an inspired half-ecstatic who lacks the ability to experience a natural, genuine ecstasy. In the south der kleine Schaman experiences only an imitative, minor sort of ecstasy (Ohlmarks 1939:8485, 109). e little shaman can only enter into a half-trance,

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

29

either with articial substances such as narcotics or alcohol, or by imitating the soul journey (Ohlmarks 1939:100101, 122). Classifying religious specialists in this way according to their psychological or neurological states is quite ill-advised. It is simply not possible to verify the existence of a so-called genuine ecstasy that exists only in the north Arctic area. Observations of mental diseases and trance-like symptoms have been made all over the world, and it has been demonstrated that ecstasy is not unique to the Arctic region (Eliade 1968:39). As noted above, Ohlmarks (1939:24, 35) himself admits that the shaman did not always have to be an emotionally unbalanced individual (Eliade 1968:39, note 1). A religious specialist may follow a family tradition, which might signify that his or her abilities are inherited, but it is not necessary that he or she do so. An individual with a normal or stable psychological condition can use shamanistic techniques in order to gain ecstasy. us, Czaplickas hypothesis that the shamans extraordinary powers can only be transmitted genetically between family members is not tenable (Siikala 1978:46, 313). Nevertheless, religious specialists may have an extraordinary psychological constitution in the sense that they have a predisposition to be overly sensitive or nervous. Many scholars have observed that numerous religious specialists are mentally predisposed to fullling their functions. But one must also bear in mind that the religious specialist controls the ecstasy, the sign of his or her mentally unstable state, by means of a ritual. is is in stark contrast to more ordinary psychiatric patients (Hultkrantz 1978:26). According to Eliade, a mental patient has no religious experience. He or she is only un mystique simiesque. Such patients cannot be religious specialists because they have no direct contact with the supernatural world or any ability to manipulate it. ey can give the impression of having a religious experience, but in reality this is a neurosis (Eliade 1968:39, 41). Eliade refers to Nadels 1946 investigation of tribes in the Sudan, where neither epilepsy, which occurs quite frequently in this region, nor any other mental illness is considered to be a sign of a religious specialist being possessed by a spirit (Eliade 1968:39). While there are many scholarly theories which maintain that the shaman represents a psychologically unstable person, they were developed by anthropologists who witnessed ecstatic rituals, not psychopathic

30

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

behaviour. Because religious specialists practiced secret ecstatic rituals that dealt with dangerous powers, they were conceived of as being out of balance mentally (Gilberg 1984:2627). ese extraordinary rituals comprise dierent techniques by which the religious specialist can attain a state of trance or ecstasy. Since ecstatic and trance-like conditions are easily misunderstood, the shamans were accordingly considered to be mentally unbalanced. Mental instability can, however, be one of several signs that the neophyte is in the process of being chosen by the spirits before his or her initiation as a shaman (Eliade 1968:9, 43). Siikala asserts that abnormal, nervous behaviour can signal that the spirits have chosen a member of the group to become a shaman. is is a natural part of his or her initiation (Siikala 1978:313; 1992: 56). e initiation is regularly marked by symptoms of disease or hysteria. It is part of a role-taking tradition and is only apparently hysterical (Siikala 1978:3233). According to Lewis (1989:4748), Arctic hysteria can be an indication of either the rst voluntary possession of the shaman by spirits or of an involuntary possession. Except for the ecstatic experience, the initiation of the neophyte prior to becoming a shaman consists of learning the secret tradition of shamanic knowledge. A mentally disordered person can hardly benet from religious instruction. Moreover, the fundamental function of religious specialists within a community is to help fellow human beings by communicating with supernatural beings in non-human space. In this manner, the religious specialist acts as a mediator between the deities and spirits on the one hand and human beings on the other. A psychologically unstable individual is hardly suited for this kind of task (Eliade 1968:43). Compulsive neurotics would indeed not play constructive roles in helping others (Eliade 1968:3940; Gilberg 1984:2627; Hoppl 1985:122123). Hallucinogenic Substances and Altered States of Consciousness Several scholars emphasize that the shaman performs ecstatic rituals, and that in the process of doing so the consciousness of the shaman is altered. He or she attains an altered state of consciousness.33 According
33) e concepts trance and ecstasy will be used as synonyms. Cf. the argument made by Hultkrantz 1978:19.

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

31

to some researchers, the ecstatic trance constitutes a key component of shamanism (Ortiz de Montellano 1990:68). Numerous anthropologists have focused on a cultures having access to hallucinogenic substances, and they classify such a culture as shamanistic.34 e cultivation and use of various types of hallucinogenic substances by religious specialists has been and continues to be an exaggerated concern among Western scholars. For instance, Mercedes de la Garza has made an index of psychoactive hallucinogenic substances in order to validate the supposed existence of shamanism in Mesoamerica (Garza 1990).35 Not only shamans, however, but many types of religious specialists perform ecstatic rituals. ey can manipulate the ecstasy or trance by means of religious techniques. Hallucinogenic substances are a common, although not a necessary, means by which the religious specialist attempts to attain ecstasy (Siikala 1978:11). A variety of culturally determined ritual techniques can also produce an ecstatic state: fasting, isolation, exhaustion, music, dance, narcotics, tobacco, alcohol, and so forth. What various levels of loss of consciousness and abnormal behaviour ensue depend upon the specic cultural tradition (Siikala 1978:2627). In various cultures religious specialists consume hallucinogenic substances during rituals. But ecstasy is only an indication of shamanism; by itself it is not sucient evidence for it (Eliade 1968: 2223).36 e problem with a denition based on the presence of a state of ecstasy or an altered state of consciousness is that it allows an alcoholic, a drug addict, a psychopath, or for that matter any type of human being or religious specialist to be categorized as a shaman. Richard Noll criticizes an anthropological psychopathological model of shamanism in which shamans are considered to be schizophrenic individuals (Noll 1983).37 Noll maintains that schizophrenics do not master
Cf. for instance Furst 1972a, 1972b, 1976, and Reichel-Domato 1975. I thank Mrs. Gabina Aurora Prez Jimnez of Leiden University, who made me aware of the exaggerated signicance of hallucinogenic substances, which various authors and researchers have attributed to the religious specialists nagual and shaman (Prez Jimnez, personal communication, 1997). 36) An example of a shamanic journey to the beyond without the loss of consciousness has been observed in the shamanism of the Samoyed (Siikala 1978:215). 37) Many scholars have argued against a psychopathological analysis of shamanism; cf. Noll 1983:444.
34) 35)

32

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

their altered states of consciousness, whereas the shaman can enter and leave this state, a supposed shamanic state of consciousness which constitutes a separate altered state of consciousness (Noll 1983:443), at will (Noll 1983:450451). Ordinary people, i.e., those who are not initiated religious specialists, who are under the inuence of intoxication or who have what Winkelman calls biologically based alteredstate-of-consciousness potentials (Winkelman 1990:308, 313325; 1992:4753) do not necessarily have the indispensable knowledge or experience to perform religious duties and functions. Training in an esoteric religious tradition, correct performance of the mystic ritual, and a belief in the extraordinary powers of the religious specialists by their co-believers in the community are required and in fact are much more important to shamanism than the use of hallucinogenic remedies or a natural talent for attaining an altered state of consciousness. e state of ecstasy or trance is not what is important to shamanism, even if that state is created by a genuine ecstasy caused by the climate (Ohlmarks 1939) or by the use of hallucinogenics like alcohol and various narcotic substances (cf. Furst 1972a, 1972b, 1976). e ritual technique or the mental health of an individual is not what is really important, either. In reality, the shaman or the religious specialist is generally one of the healthiest individuals in the community (Hoppl 1985:122123).38 e trance of the shaman is typically achieved by the control he or she exercises. It is not spontaneous but, in contrast to hysteria, it is ritually organized, with rules for proper conduct (de Heusch 1981:152). As a religious specialist who has social obligations, the shaman cannot be a psychopath or a passive drug addict:
Firstly, a hysteric, unlike a shaman, cannot control his attacks or act as need demands. Secondly, even though we were to assume, as Arbman does, that the hysteric can if he wishes suggest himself into a trance, he would not be able to satisfy the expectations and social obligations attached to the shamans position. (Siikala 1978:47)

Humphrey puts forward a convincing argument against the employment by anthropologists of the terms ecstasy and trance in order to
Among the Tungus, the shaman may begin his life career with a psychosis but cannot carry on his functions if he cannot master himself (Shirokogoro 1935:366).
38)

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

33

dene shaman as a particular category. To do so is meaningless, because too many people singers, diviners, midwives, hunters, and many others can enter this state. Ecstasy and trance are not needed in order to get in contact with the supernatural. For example, the yadagan shaman of the Daur Mongols does not need to enter this kind of mental state, for which there is no indigenous word in North Asia, when travelling outside the human world (Humphrey and Onon 1996:3031). We can therefore safely conclude that hallucinogens, ecstasy, trance, or altered states of consciousness are not distinctive traits indicative of shamanism, unless they lead to a voyage, manipulated at will by certain religious specialists, to a supernatural world, such as among the Siona of the Putumayo region of Colombia and the Jvaro and Quijos of the Ro Napo of eastern Ecuador (Harner 1972:153; 1973:159160). A Sociological/Anthropological Perspective: (Position) of the Shaman e Role (Function) and Status

Barbara Tedlock has carried out remarkable eld research among the Kichee-Maya in the Highlands of Guatemala (Tedlock 1992). ere are two religious specialists among the Kichee called ajkij and chuchkajawib. Ajkij is a day-keeper, i.e., a calendar diviner, an interpreter of dreams and a healer. Above the ajkij in the hierarchy of religious specialists is the chuchkajawib. Chuchkajawib is both a mother-father39 and a day-keeper (Tedlock 1992:47). But according to Tedlock, no cultural anthropological denition will be able to distinguish between these two religious specialists:
If one adopted the analytical method cultural anthropologists use for separating shamans from priests, in which the priest serves as an intermediary between man and the gods while the shaman directly possesses (or is possessed by) supernatural powers in the realm of divination and curing, one would have to refer to all Momostecan day-keepers and mother-fathers as both priests and shamans. (Tedlock 1992:47)

A theoretical dichotomy between the priest and the shaman presupposes that the latter is a diviner and a medicine man, whereas the
Among the Kichee-Maya a mother-father is a ritual-symbolic androgynous parent of the members of a lineage (Tedlock 1992).
39)

34

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

priest functions as a mediator between the supernatural world and humans beings. Among the Kichee it is not possible to make this demarcation between shaman and priest, because both ajk ij and chuchkajawib are, according to this denition, simultaneously priest and shaman. is applies also to other religious specialists in Mesoamerica (Tedlock 1992:47). Tedlock also notes another strategy for making an anthropological distinction between the shaman and the priest. e priest serves the entire community, whereas the shaman is only concerned with the individual (Tedlock 1992:51). ere is accordingly a dichotomy between private and public rituals. e priest undertakes public rituals whereas the shaman conducts private ones. Because his or her public actions are directed towards the community (or the lineage), the priest represents religion. Conversely, the private ritual practices of the shaman are concerned with the individual and are therefore exclusively personal and magical. Tedlock points out that this distinction, too, does not permit a classication of ajk ij and chuchkajawib as priest and shaman respectively (Tedlock 1992:52):
Any attempt to separate priests from shamans in these communities according to a public/private, or religion/magic dichotomy fails, since the same practitioner could be called, in dierent contexts, either priest or shaman.

Tedlock maintains that it is the role, i.e., the function, of the religious specialist and not his or her status that makes it possible to separate the two categories of religious specialists. us, one has to distinguish between the role and the status of the religious specialist:
If a practitioner performs both shamanic and priestly roles, even though he does not have an institutionalised status with respect to a lineage, clan, or community, then it is misleading to simply designate him or her as a shaman. In other words, among the Maya the technical terms shaman and priests are useful, when separated, only as role and not as status designations. (Tedlock 1992:52)

When the religious specialist practices as a diviner or as a healer, he or she can be categorized as a shaman, but when the religious specialist operates as a mediator between the supernatural and the natural world he or she is classied as a priest. By contrast, a denition based upon

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

35

the religious specialists status is impossible. Tedlock chooses therefore to denote the status of religious specialists by means of the compound concepts priest-shaman and shaman-priest, depending on their participation in public or private rituals (Tedlock 1992:5253). Robert Lowie had previously suggested a similar theoretical but articial distinction between shaman and priest (Lowie 1963:179180). is is actually not a very useful distinction, because the religious category priest exclusively pertains to the Christian religion. Scholars should therefore completely discard this notion in studies of nonChristian religious systems. Moreover, the compromise of creating a dichotomy of priest-shaman versus shaman-priest, as proposed by Tedlock, is not theoretically satisfactory. A categorization of religious specialists should be unambiguous. Do not the diviner and the healer, or the priest, for that matter, act as mediums between the supernatural and the human world? How can the diviner and the healer or priest undertake their religious duties and functions if they do not have any contact with deities or (ancestor) spirits? In addition, religious specialists in, for example, Northeast Asia partake in both public and private ceremonies. Ethnography from this region demonstrates that the shaman participates in both public and private rituals, within the context of the clan, in larger ceremonies, and in connection with the family (Siikala 1978:24). In fact, the status and function of religious specialists vary according to the culture and the socio-economic system (Honko 1969:26; Siikala 1978:2; 303). Well into the twentieth century, American anthropologists thought of the shaman and the medicine man as identical (Eliade 1968:22; Hultkrantz 1989:45; Lowie 1963:161). Today, scholars reject this theoretical conception of the shaman. Siikala asserts that the shaman has dierent functions in various cultures (Siikala 1978:15). Ohlmarks argues that the shaman is a medicine man, a primitive priest and a sorcerer (Ohlmarks 1939:59). Hence, the shaman can have dierent religious functions simultaneously. For instance, he or she can be a psychopomp, a healer, a medicine man, a diviner, and a protector of the hunt or of fertility (Eliade 1968:25). Shirokogoro maintains that within a particular community the shaman may have dierentiated functions. Among the Tungus the shaman constitutes the diviner, healer, and psychopomp; he sacrices to the spirits, and so forth

36

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

(Shirokogoro 1935:304). A functional or a role-based denition of the shaman is therefore not tenable. A religious specialist does not have to be able to execute all types of functions. Other types of religious specialists can perform some of the tasks mentioned above (Eliade 1968:21, 25, 156, 233). Instead, Eliade argues that the shaman does not have a denite function, but that there exists a particular religious technique that separates him or her from other categories of religious specialists (Eliade 1968:22):
De ce fait, bien que le chaman soit, entre autre qualits, un magicien, nimporte quel magicien ne peut pas tre quali de chaman. La mme prcision simpose propos des gurisons chamaniques: tout medicine-man est gurisseur, mais le chaman utilise une mthode qui nappartient qu lui. (Eliade 1968:22)

Certainly, the shaman does have important functions and a special status in the community. If the shaman does not make himself or herself useful, the fellow members of the community will not derive any benet from the shamans activities (Eliade 1968:25). But it is not possible to establish a shaman concept on the basis of a specic function that a religious specialist performs. Hultkrantz writes:
What, then, are the services that the professional shaman can provide for his clients? ey are of dierent nature, and their only common denominator is the circumstance that they presuppose supernatural action. Furthermore, it is only occasionally that one and the same shaman masters all the shamanistic activities. If we have to pinpoint one central activity it should be that of the healer. However, not all shamans are healers. It is therefore dicult to dene shamanism with reference to its professional functions. (Hultkrantz 1978:15)

A sociological or anthropological analysis of the role or status of religious specialists in a society/community is therefore of no avail in identifying shamanism. Instead, what isolates the shaman as an analytic category denoting a particular category of religious specialist is direct communication between the human and the supernatural. is point has been emphasized by various scholars (Hoppl 1985:127; Hultkrantz 1978:34; Schrder 1955:879; Siikala 1978:28; 1992:8, 26, 319320). But, the question remains, what kind of direct communication is exclusively shamanistic?

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

37

A large majority of religious specialists mediate ceremonially between deities and human beings. It is, accordingly, the ritual of the religious specialists that provides a fundamental criterion for constructing the concept of the shaman. e status and function of the shaman is manifested in his or her ritual performance. Moreover, by identifying and analyzing the religious ritual practice of the shaman, we can locate the ideology of shamanism. A History of Religions Analysis of the Ritual In what precedes, I have demonstrated that it is not methodologically viable to construct an ideal type of a religious specialist through an etymological, geographical, psychological, anthropological, or sociological strategy. My contention in what follows is that in studying religious specialists and religious phenomena, researchers should employ the method of the history of religions, which in this case means studying the religious ritual. e Initiation Ritual: A Direct Meeting with the Ancestors, Spirits, or Deities Religious specialists of various types have to undergo an initiation ritual or rite de passage before they can master their profession and be recognized by other members of their community (Van Gennep 1981 [1909]; Turner 1967). A rite de passage comprises not only a transition between social states; persons who are initiated also achieve a new status that can be considered as resulting from an ontological transformation. As Victor Turner writes, It [the rite de passage] is not a mere acquisition of knowledge, but a change in being (Turner 1967:102). Every member of the community undergoes one or more rites de passage during their lifetime, but the rite de passage needed in order to become a religious specialist is an esoteric initiation reserved for the select few. is type of ritual process results in an attainment of gnosis or secret knowledge. Numerous scholars argue that it is in fact the special initiation ritual that distinguishes the shaman from other categories of religious specialists. It is meeting directly with spirits during the initiation ritual that makes the shaman extraordinary and dierent from, for instance, the

38

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

priest. Ethnographic data from Siberia show that shamans are initiated after directly meeting with gods or spirits (Sternberg 1925:472473). e anthropologists William Madsen, William A. Lessa, and Evon Z. Vogt assert that the shaman experiences a direct revelation of the divine. In contrast to the shaman, the priest has only been educated and is accordingly only initiated into a tradition (Lessa and Vogt 1979:301; Madsen 1955:48). e shaman becomes initiated through dreams, wherein the neophyte for the rst time comes into direct contact with the supernatural. For instance, Vogt employs this denition in order to classify the religious specialist of the Zinacanteco Maya, the hilol (seer), as a shaman (Vogt 1969:416). Van Gennep also claims that the magician and the shaman are dierent from other religious specialists, such as the priest and the brahmin, because of the particular initiation ritual. In contrast to the priest and the brahmin, the shaman and the magician are initiated into a sacred world (Van Gennep 1981 [1909]:152). It is, however, just as important that the religious specialist, chosen by supernatural beings and/or having had a personal experience of the supernatural world, is trained within a cultural and religious tradition (Gilberg 1984:25). Eliade asserts that the initiation of the shaman consists both of his or her meeting directly with supernatural beings and of instruction: 1. dordre extatique. A call in a dream, during disease or trance/ ecstasy by gods, spirits and ancestors. 2. dordre traditionnel. A teaching of the techniques of the shaman, the name and function of the spirits, learning the myths, the genealogy of the clan, and the secret language of the spirits (Eliade 1968:2829, 34, 4445). e shamans initiation coincides with a period of education. e apprentice must learn the arcane topography of non-human space. He or she can also meet with the spirits directly. e individual to be initiated as a shaman can be instructed by the spirits and/or by older shamans. Occasionally, shamans who have passed away will elect the apprentice (Eliade 1968:82). By perceiving the spirits, the novice gains a condition spirituelle, abandons his or her former profane existence,

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

39

and enters a sacred condition (Eliade 1968:83, 89). During initiation the neophytes acquire what will later be their auxiliary spirits. ey must moreover prove their power in a public ritual in order to be accepted as shamans by the community (Siikala 1978:5, 67). According to Siikala, in Siberia and Central Asia a person must meet three requirements in order to become a shaman. He or she must 1. . . . possess the ability to achieve ecstasy; 2. have met directly with supernatural beings, possess intimate knowledge of the supernatural world, and be able to communicate with spirits or deities on his or her own initiative; and 3. be dependent upon a following within the community that believes that he or she possesses the necessary abilities and knowledge. It is only this last factor that distinguishes the shaman from individual ecstatics and seers (Siikala 1978:311).40 A privileged education within an obscure tradition and directly meeting with (ancestor) spirits or deities are, however, fundamental elements in the initiations of various religious specialists. Religious specialists of many dierent categories, such as the prophet and the visionary, are initiated after experiencing a direct encounter with representatives (deities and spirits) of the supernatural realm. is is in fact a quite common feature in most religious systems. It is thus incongruous to classify a religious specialist as a shaman only on the basis of communication with deities and spirits. Accordingly, shaman is not a useful designation for a religious specialist who meets and communicates with representatives of non-human space.

40) Although the basic elements of the shamanic initiation are the same, other features, such as a) the length of the period as novice, b) the nature and amount of tradition to be internalized, c) the passing on of tradition or guiding the novice, d) the nature and amount of ritual activity and e) the control of the skill of the initiate, are in accordance with the form of shamanism in question (Siikala 1978:311).

40

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

ree Religious Ritual Techniques: Possession, Vision, and the Voyage of the Soul Religious specialists generally establish a connection with supernatural beings, such as spirits and gods, as well as with supranormal space, through ritual practice. But in what way does this contact take place? ere are three fundamental ritual techniques: 1. A vision of supernatural beings in the human world, 2. Physical possession by supernatural beings in the human world, and 3. Direct communication with supernatural beings after making a journey into the non-human world, i.e., into an extraordinary spatial dimension. Lowie asserts that the shaman is a religious specialist who communicates directly with supernatural beings either through dreams or visions or by being possessed by spirits (quoted in Madsen 1955:48). e problem with this assertion is that the same type of communication is quite common among very many types of religious specialists. Consequently, there is no reason to ascribe this meaning to the concept shaman. Within the specialized literature on shamanism there is a general consensus that shamans master culturally determined religious ritual ecstatic techniques which put them into a trance or ecstatic state and thereby enable them to experience a direct meeting with supernatural beings (cf. Eliade 1968; Hultkrantz 1978; Lewis 1996; Ohlmarks 1939; Schrder 1955; Siikala 1978; Vajda 1959, 1964; etc.). ere is, however, no agreement among scholars as to the manner in which this direct meeting takes place. Siikala writes that:
Features typical of such research are the division of the shamanic complex into its components, examination of the ecstatic behaviour of the shaman, the spirithelper system, initiatory visions, the journey of the soul to the Beyond or the characteristics of the shamanic cosmology, followed by an attempt to indicate the cultural-historical or geographical ties between these components. e chief problem has often concerned the question as to which of the features of shamanism is most fundamental or vital to the entire phenomenon. (Siikala 1978:25)

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

41

It is possible to identify three theoretical positions about the character of the ceremonial direct meeting of the shaman with the spirits and the deities: 1. Findeisen argues (1957) that by means of their ecstatic technique shamans are possessed by spirits. But Shirokogoro (1935) and Lewis (1996) call attention to the fact that shamans are not passive mediums for these spirits but rather master them. According to them, the shaman is e Master of the Spirits. 2. Ohlmarks (1939), Eliade (1968), Gilberg (1984), and Pentikinen (1998a) maintain that the voyage of the soul to the supernatural world is characteristic of the shamanic religious technique. 3. e shaman masters the voyage of the soul to the other world and has at the same time the power to be possessed by spirits. In addition, the shaman constitutes a religious specialist who can have visions of gods, spirits, and ancestors. e hypothesis that shamans command various religious techniques, so that they can communicate with the supernatural world, is the most common position in the theoretical literature on shamanism. Various scholars Vajda (1964), Schrder (1955), Hultkrantz (1978), and Siikala (1978) represent this school of thought. I shall now examine these three positions in order to identify the distinctive qualities that distinguish the shaman from other constructed categories of religious specialists. Possession: e Master of the Spirits Findeisen claims that the shaman is characterized by being able to be possessed by spirits. He or she is not an ordinary priest but rather a Besessenheitspriester, a spiritual medium who has a spiritual experience (Findeisen 1957:7, 14, 108, 201, 237). e shaman can be classied as a priest because he or she conducts, e.g., via the sacrice of a horse, the soul together with the sacriced animal to God in heaven (Findeisen 1957:201, note 4). Contrary to the priest, however, the shaman can put himself or herself into a state of trance and become possessed by the

42

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

spirits (Findeisen 1957:162, 201, note 4). Accordingly, the shamans soul is able to journey to the other world. is happens because possession by the spirits liberates the soul from the body and makes the soul voyage possible. Consequently, for Findeisen it is the condition of being possessed by spirits that is the distinctive feature of the shaman and shamanism (Findeisen 1957:237, note 1). Lewis agrees with Findeisen that the special characteristic of the shaman is his ability to be possessed by the spirits (Lewis 1989, 1996). e shaman incarnates the spirits, so that his or her body becomes their temple (Lewis 1996:113). For him, however, the incorporation of spirits within the body of the shaman, i.e., possession by spirits, is a more important than the journey of the soul to the supernatural world. us, being possessed by spirits constitutes the essential quality of shamanism (Lewis 1996:113). But Lewis emphasizes that the shaman is not simply a medium for the spirits. is religious specialist is characterized by his or her control and mastery of the possessed spirits. e shaman is, therefore, according to Lewis, e Master of the Spirits (Lewis 1996). He writes:
A shaman is an inspired prophet and healer, a charismatic religious gure, with power to control the spirits, usually by incarnating them. If spirits speak through him, he is also likely to have the capacity to engage in mystical ight and other out-of-body experiences. (Lewis 1996:116)

As we see in the above quote, Lewis does not rule out a voyage of the shamans soul to the supernatural world, but this technique is of secondary importance. What is essential is the ritual practice that the shaman performs in this world, which creates contact with the upper world or the world below (Lewis 1996:114). e essence of the shamans role, Shirokogoro insists, lies in their ability to incorporate potentially dangerous spirits into their bodies, thus neutralizing or mastering them (Lewis 1996:114). For the Tungus, being possessed by spirits was equal to being ill. Persons who introduced the spirits into their bodies of their own free will, however, were considered to be shamans. As a consequence, the term shaman denotes a person whom the members of a community believe to have the ability to control the spirits. At the same time, a man or woman who is only a passive instrument for the spirits is not regarded as a shaman (Lewis

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

43

1996:8, 113).41 According to this theory, then, a shaman is a woman or a man who controls the spirits. He or she can incorporate the spirits into his or her own body and can also incarnate the spirits when he or she is in a condition of trance or ecstasy (Lewis 1996:113114; Shirokogoro 1935:274). e shaman can both induce the spirits to enter the body and expel them at will. He or she is indeed e Master of the Spirits. Spirit possession constitutes a religious phenomenon that has been the object of heated debate among scholars. Arbman asserts that the shaman is more of an impersonator than a person possessed by spirits. us, according to him, the belief in possession states does not exist in North America or in Siberia (Hultkrantz 1978:2324). Carlo Ginzburg has pointed out that a dichotomy between the journey of the soul and a state of possession is dicult to maintain since the shaman is often in a dramatic trance, in which on many occasions he or she impersonates animals and as a consequence loses his or her identity (Ginzburg 1991:285, note 150). Hultkrantz asserts that many cases that have been reported as possession are exaggerated, but that . . . we nd now and then possession states in Siberian shamanism, as we do in the closely connected shamanism of the American Northwest Coast (Hultkrantz 1978:25). Eliade maintains that shamanism, i.e., the journey of the soul, and possession do not automatically belong together in all cultures:
ere is a certain facility and a certain automatism in the phenomenon of possession that are in contrast with the discipline, the self-control, and the concentration of the real shaman; nally there are broad cultural zones (Melanesia, Polynesia), where possession is a spontaneous and rather frequently encountered phenomenon at the fringes of the sphere of the specialist of the sacred with hardly any relation to shamanism as such. (Eliade 1961:155)

Manabu Waida distinguishes between two forms of possession state, voluntary incorporation and involuntary intrusion of spirits. In the rst case, individuals keep their personalities and are not simply passive

e shaman is not a person possessed by the spirits but the spirits are possessed by him (Lewis 1984:8; 1996:113).
41)

44

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

mediums. ey are then masters of their own conditions of possession,42 what Lewis and Shirokogoro call e Master of the Spirits. e involuntary state is the diametrical opposite. In this case the shaman loses control over the intrusive hostile spirits (Waida 1983:233). Hultkrantz suggests an interesting etymological hypothesis about the two understandings of the possession phenomenon. He points out that there is a semantic ambivalence inherent in the English words possess and possessed, which may have led to a fundamental misunderstanding. Possess means to own something. In this sense of the word one controls an object or a spirit. To be possessed, however, marks a passive condition. e individual is possessed by something, an object or a spirit, such as the devil in Christian theology: As always in AngloSaxon studies the two meanings of possession as possessing something, and as being possessed play havoc . . . (Hultkrantz 1978:22). e anthropologist Raymond Firth distinguishes three dierent conditions, contrasting possession with control over the spirits:
1) Spirit possession,phenomena of abnormal behavior, which are interpreted by other members of the society as evidence that a spirit is controlling the persons actions and probably inhabiting his body. 2) Spirit mediumship, the use of such behaviour by members of the society as a means of communication with what they understand to be entities in the spirit world. 3) Shamanism, applied to those phenomena where a person, either a spirit medium or not, is regarded as controlling spirits, exercising his mastery over them in socially recognized ways. (Firth 1967:296)

is is a rigid and thus not particularly useful theory, since the religious specialist can move freely among these three conditions. Crapanzano writes: Often the human victim of the spirit moves if not in one sance, then throughout the course of his relationship with the spirit in and out of all three states (Crapanzano 1977:10). Lewis here refers to Shirokogoro, who states that among the Tungus shamans could lose their command over the spirits (Lewis 1996:118). In fact, they
He is Matre de sa possession. He provokes the state of possession ritually through dance, monotonous music, and hallucinogens. He is not a medium without a will, but knows the being that is incorporated within his body and he manipulates it consciously (Hubert and Mauss 19021903:35).
42)

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

45

move in and out of various roles (functions) and conditions during the course of their careers: is is why individually the terms possessed person, spirit medium, and shaman are not very helpful typologically at the cultic or cultural level (Lewis 1996:119).43 It is thus surprising that Lewis chooses to call the shaman e Master of the Spirits. Siikala rejects the hypothesis that the shaman is always e Master of the Spirits, because the extent of the shamans control over spirits varies from one shamanistic context to the next (Siikala 1978:8, 16). Possession, Vision, and Voyage of the Soul e majority of researchers specializing in shamanism, like Schrder (1955:862), Vajda (1959:459), Hoppl (1985:134), Johansen (1987:7), and Siikala (1978:1), maintain that both the ability to be possessed by the spirits and the voyage of the soul to the beyond are religio-magical techniques that distinguish the shaman as a particular type of religious specialist. Siikala states that:
e journey of the shaman and possession, the entering of the spirit into the shamans body, which Eliade rejects and Hans Findeisen emphasizes as one of the basic characteristics of shamanism, are simply functional alternatives describing the communication between the shaman and the other world. (Siikala 1978:13)

Hultkrantz argues that the shaman is a professional medium linking this world and the supernatural one because he or she both masters the voyage of the soul and at the same time has the power to be possessed by the spirits. But Hultkrantz is of the opinion that the shamans ability to become possessed by the spirits is not as important as the journey of the soul and the visions of auxiliary spirits (Hultkrantz 1978:20).44 Agreeing with Arbman, Hultkrantz claims that the shaman can create direct contact with supernatural beings through visions or dreams in a
43) Cf. the model and gure of the shamanistic career as formulated by Lewis (1996:118121). 44) Hultkrantz distinguishes between two types of medicine men in North America: the visionary, whose trance is light and who is a clairvoyant, and the ecstatic, who can meet the spirits or make a soul journey and sometimes is possessed by the spirits (Hultkrantz 1988:87).

46

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

state of ecstasy (Arbman 1926:5758; 1927:606608; Hultkrantz 1978:25). Consequently, the shaman represents a religious specialist who can achieve contact with the supernatural through an ecstatic ritual experience (Hultkrantz 1978:11). In Siberia and North America there are examples of the shaman falling into ecstasy and receiving the spirits in the mundane world instead of the shamans soul going on a journey to the supernatural world (Hultkrantz 1973:29). Hultkrantz therefore denes the shaman as a social functionary who, with the help of guardian spirits, attains ecstasy in order to create a rapport with the supernatural world on behalf of his group members (Hultkrantz 1973:34). As I shall later elaborate, such an extensive denition is unsatisfactory, because it does not specify the specic feature characteristic of this particular category of religious specialists. e Voyage of the Soul to the Supernatural World Gilberg (1984), Paulson,45 Ohlmarks (1939), and Eliade (1968) stress the voyage of the soul as the decisive element in dening a religious specialist as a shaman. According to Gilberg the voyage of the soul of the shaman constitutes the most important feature of shamanism. e shaman controls the journey of the soul and is not under the inuence of other forces (Gilberg 1984:2223). Eliade is perhaps the most well-known advocate of the view that the shaman exclusively has the capability to go on a voyage of the soul (Eliade 1964, 1968). As we shall see, Eliade agrees with Hultkrantz and other scholars like Siikala, Schrder, and Vajda about shamanistic elements such as auxiliary spirits, a specic cosmology, ecstatic rituals, and so forth. He insists, however, that it is the journey of the soul to the supernatural world that dierentiates the shaman from other religious specialists, such as the priest, the magician, the prophet, and the medicine man. e shaman is a religious specialist who, by dierent techniques of ecstasy, is able to liberate his or her soul or souls from the body and send it or them to the supernatural world. It is this ecstatic technique that enables the shaman to communicate directly with supernatural beings in supernatural space. e shaman is the only person in the community who has the power to undertake a journey
45)

In a review of Findeisen 1957, quoted in Hultkrantz 1978:21.

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

47

between ontological zones after performing a ritual. No other human being besides the shaman can move without risk, freely, and under full control between these ontological spheres (Eliade 1968:211). e journey of the soul to the supernatural world represents the element that separates the shaman from other religious specialists who practice ecstatic rituals. It is only the shaman who masters the unique religio-magical technique that makes him or her capable of encountering the gods or spirits in their world. La communication relle entre les trois zones cosmiques . . . is only accessible to the shaman, not to the other members of the community (Eliade 1968:2223, 215). e shaman is one of the elect, a member of an arcane elite that through a crise religieuse has a particular call that opens up access to what Eliade calls the sacred (i.e., preternatural space). Shamans comprise a privileged social group because of their ability to communicate directly with supernatural beings in the supernatural world, an access denied to other members of the community. us, shamans gain distinction by means of their particular and powerful technique and, according to Eliade, as a result of the intensity of their religious experience (Eliade 1968:24). e ritual of the shaman is not possible without the aid of auxiliary spirits (les esprits auxiliaires). According to Eliade, they prepare the shaman for the journey of the soul, initiate the shaman into the mysteries of the supernatural, and carry the soul of the shaman to the beyond (Eliade 1968:88, 90). By taking the form of the auxiliary spirit, which is often theriomorphic, the shaman leaves the human, profane condition and enters into what Eliade labels a sacred condition (Eliade 1968:83). Specialists, whether religious or not, may be able transform themselves into an animal or natural form, but this does not mean that they are shamans, since they do not leave the human world in order to go to the realm of the deities and spirits. is well-known phenomenon is called nagualism in Mesoamerica (cf. Pharo 2001; Pharo, forthcoming).46
46) e shaman has been erroneously compared with the Mesoamerican nagual (from the Nahuatl word nahualli). A nagual constitutes the ideal type of a religious specialist who can (like the deities) transform himself or herself, after a religious ritual, into another being, i.e., a natural phenomenon or an animal. Of course, the shaman can do this also, but the nagual does not undertake the transcendental voyage of the shaman (Pharo 2001, forthcoming).

48

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

e shaman controls the spirits and in rare cases is possessed by them. e auxiliary spirits aid the shaman in communication with the gods, spirits, or ancestors. ey are often manifested by an imitation carried out by the shaman, for instance, when he or she performs as an animal. But, Eliade maintains, the shaman is never possessed by auxiliary spirits, even during the initiation period. It is the shaman who is in control. He or she is never a helpless medium for the spirits (Eliade 1968:89). Although there are examples in which the spirits can possess the shaman, this is not, according to Eliade, an essential trait of shamanism stricto sensu (Eliade 1968:89). He emphasizes that the shaman is in opposition to a possd; he or she controls the spirits by taking them voluntarily into his or her own body (Eliade 1968:23, 388). Possession versus Voyage of the Soul Paulson criticized Findeisen for his contention that spirits may possess the shaman. Findeisen claimed that the journey of the soul could only be undertaken when spirits had invaded the shamans body and subsequently liberated the soul (Findeisen 1957:237, quoted in Hultkrantz 1978:2122). Paulson asserted, however, that this conception had more to do with spiritual mediumism than with shamanism. For him shamans are Masters of the Spirits, since they retain their own personalities and are not slaves of the spirits, i.e., mere instruments in their hands (Paulson 1958:225, quoted in Hultkrantz 1978:21). We must ask, then: is it incompatible for a religious specialist to be both possessed by the spirits and at the same time to have the ability to go on a journey of the soul to the supernatural world? In other words, is there a contradiction between a voyage of the soul and a state of possession? Like Paulson, Ohlmarks makes a rigid distinction between, on the one hand, ecstasy and the journey of the soul with the assistance of auxiliary spirits (Hilfsgeistern) and, on the other, being possessed by spirits (Ohlmarks 1939:61, 71). He maintains that during the sance the shaman is totally dependent upon the auxiliary spirits. Sometimes these spirits assist the shaman in the voyage of the soul. Such spirits may possess the shaman but, Ohlmarks insists, it is the voyage of

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

49

the soul that is typical of the genuine shaman (Ohlmarks 1939:71). Eliade argues, however, that the various techniques employed by the shaman are not contradictory but rather have evolved over time (Eliade 1961). According to him, there have been three stages in the history of the shaman: 1. Ascension (to the sky or upper world). 2. Ascension and descent (to the upper and lower worlds). 3. Possession (by the spirits). Eliade maintains that the journey of the shaman to the sky (upper world) is older than the descent to the underworld. It is also more universal and more common in myths, dreams and visions than the descensus ad inferos. Death and resurrection encompass an archaic phenomenon, while a journey to heaven is a primordial one. Travel to heaven is easier to understand, Eliade claims; unlike the voyage to the lower world, it does not need a supporting theory or ideology (Eliade 1961:154155). A state of possession also constitutes an archaic and universal phenomenon, but it appears later in history than ecstatic experience and the voyage of the soul. Possession developed from the same ecstasy that led to the journey of the soul. When the souls of shamans leave their bodies, spirits possess them. e result is religious experience: Shamanism is inextricably related to the phenomenon of possession (Eliade 1961: 155). Consequently, it is, as Eliade puts it, psychologically logical to assume that a possession by spirits is not possible before the soul has left the body of the shaman (Eliade 1968:394, note 1). It is, however, not possible to verify empirically the psychological logic of Eliades three-stage theory of the history of the shaman. Here we encounter one of the main methodological problems of the established theories of shamanism, namely, that many scholars have taken for granted that the shaman is a historical character and not a constructed concept (ideal type). e Belgian anthropologist Luc de Heusch has adopted Eliades theory of the evolution of the shamans religious techniques and built upon it a quite complex structural model which emphasizes a contrast between the state of being possessed by spirits and the shamans voyage of the soul (de Heusch 1981). De Heusch argues that shamanism is

50

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

de-possession as opposed to possession, which constitutes an incorporation of spirits into the body. As a consequence, the latter phenomenon is not compatible with shamanism. According to de Heusch, shamanism is marked by the ascension (to heaven) of the shaman in a stratied cosmology. It is the axis mundi that makes this voyage to heaven (but also to the underworld) possible for the shaman, with the aid of auxiliary spirits (de Heusch 1981:153). In the initiation ritual the shaman neophyte does not become possessed by protector spirits but calls upon them instead (de Heusch 1981:153). De Heusch maintains that the shaman is also a seer, but he is primarily a medicine man who locates and brings back the soul of the patient from the supernatural world. is is a form of healing that de Heusch calls shamanism A, which consists of what he calls adorcism. Another mode of shamanic curing or healing corresponds to what de Heusch designates as shamanism B, in which . . . the evil is an addition, not a subtraction (de Heusch 1981:153). ese techniques of healing are symmetrical. In shamanism B an alien, enemy spirit takes possession of the body of the patient. e shaman exorcizes this spirit by a de-possession of the alien and hostile element from the body of the patient. De Heusch compares this treatment with shamanism A, where shamanism refers to an ascent to the gods of heaven conducted by human beings (religious specialists). By contrast, the state of possession is the descent of deities or spirits to the mundane world and therefore represents an incarnation (de Heusch 1981:154). Possession B and shamanism B have in common that they are both symptoms of a disease. An alien, hostile substance invades the body of an individual and is later exorcized by the shaman. e dierence is that in possession B, the possessed person is totally overpowered and, accordingly, mentally ill. e possessed individual is a patient in a condition of trance. Conversely, in shamanism B the patient is only partially overpowered, and the shaman acts as a doctor in a state of trance (de Heusch 1981: 154155). e illness and trance are separated in shamanism, but not in possession B, where trance is a token of a particular kind of disease and at the same time a remedy to cure it (de Heusch 1981:155156). Shamanism A is structurally dierent from another type of possession, which de Heusch calls possession A, which represents an authentic or voluntary possession. Possession B comprises, as stated above, an inauthentic or involuntary possession.

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

51

In shamanism A the alien being is incorporated within the body and is therefore not considered to be a condition of illness but an epiphany. e alien being is not evil or hostile but is considered a blessing (de Heusch 1981:156). De Heusch claims that there is a regional dierence between these two forms of possession:
In authentic possession (A), the African devotee does not ascend towards the gods as the Siberian shaman does; instead, the gods descend to him and in the strongest sense of the term take possession of his body, completely taking the place of his normal personality. (de Heusch 1981:156)

Whereas the shaman restores the equilibrium of the original personality, authentic possession introduces a wholly new personality. e shaman operates alone. By using magical tricks he intentionally seeks to achieve trance. Patients (i.e., human beings who lack the supernatural gifts of the shaman) receive the trance passively, as part of a collective (de Heusch 1981:156). e basis for authentic and inauthentic possession is identical; the dierence is the outcome and the type of signicance with which the specic culture invests it (de Heusch 1981:159). Consequently, de Heusch (1981:158) distinguishes four types of shamanism and possession:47 Adorcism Shamanism A (return of the soul) Possession A (injection of a new soul) Exorcism Shamanism B (extraction of a presence that is alien to the subject) Possession B48 (extraction of a soul that is alien to the subject)

Like Eliades historical theory, however, this theoretical model suers from insurmountable empirical diculties. De Heusch and Eliade are both unable to validate their theories by observed examples. In a later
ere is also, as he calls it, a geometry of the soul in the model, which has a double inverse symmetry both horizontal and vertical (de Heusch 1981:174). 48) In possession A the religious specialist is e Master of the Spirits because there is a voluntary incorporation of the spirits. In possession B, on the other hand, the condition of possession (by intrusion) of the spirits is involuntary and therefore hostile.
47)

52

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

article ( e Madness of the Gods and the Reason of Men, 1981), de Heusch admits that ethnographic data from the Inuit and the Tungus weaken and perhaps even disprove his structural model (de Heusch 1981:174). Ethnographic studies of religions in Siberia and from the Inuit cultures of North America demonstrate that a particular religious specialist can be possessed by spirits, have visions of supernatural beings, and may even embark on a journey of the soul to the supernatural sphere. ere is, therefore, no contradiction between being possessed by spirits and making a journey to the transcendental world(s) of deities and spirits. Consequently, an antithesis between the journey of the soul and being possessed by spirits cannot be established empirically. A religious specialist can master various religious techniques. e question remains: which of these can or cannot be controlled by the so-called shaman? e Spatial Dimension of Shamanism: Space e Journey to Non-Human

I have argued that an analysis of various ritual religio-magical techniques constitutes the only eective methodological strategy for creating a typology of the shaman. As stated above, Hultkrantz, Siikala, Schrder, and Vajda agree with Eliade that the shaman can go on an expedition to the supernatural world, but they add that the shaman can also master other ritual religio-magical techniques that make contact with supernatural beings possible. For instance, the shaman can be possessed, be enlightened or, as Hultkrantz asserts, have visions of the spirits. Moreover, as already mentioned, there is a consensus among scholars that the shaman, with the help of various ritual-magical techniques, can attain a condition of ecstasy or trance. In this kind of state: 1. e shaman can travel to the beyond, i.e., to the transcendental world of gods and spirits. 2. Supernatural beings can travel to the human world by possessing the body of the shaman. ere are two forms of possession; the religious specialist is either voluntarily (as Master of the Spirits) or involuntarily possessed by an intrusion of the spirits. 3. e shaman can experience visions of supernatural beings.

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

53

We see that the rst assertion diers from the other two in terms of where the meeting with representatives of the supernatural world takes place. In assertions two and three the encounter between the human being and the deities or spirits takes place in the human world. In assertion one, however, communication between humans and supernatural beings occurs in the supernatural world. Scholars construct concepts by dening or isolating certain phenomena theoretically. Fundamentally, there exist two principal possibilities or rather strategies for creating a concept. One is what Hultkrantz denotes a constitution (Hultkrantz 1978), and the other is what Eliade has named a distinction (Eliade 1968) or, as we have seen, what Hubert and Mauss called caracteristiques direntielles. Hultkrantz chose several elements that he considered relevant in his denition of the shaman in order to classify shamans as belonging to a specic category of religious specialists. He put forth what he called the four constituents of shamanism, which together set the shaman apart from other religious specialists (Hultkrantz 1978:1112). We may briey summarize these four constituents as follows: 1. e shamanistic cosmology contains a three-layered universe with an upper world, the human world, and a lower world. e shamanistic ideology is conditioned by a supernatural world with which the shaman can establish contact. An axis mundi, which can be symbolized by a world tree, a pillar, a world river, or by other means, connects these ontologically dierent spheres. e shaman can operate in all three spheres after conducting an ecstatic ritual in which he goes on a soul voyage. 2. Shamans can have many functions in the community. ey can act as mediums between this world and the beyond. ey can be medicine men or women or healers, diviners, interpreters of dreams, soothsayers, psychopomps, leaders of religious practice, magicians aiding in hunting and shing, sacricial priests, and so forth. 3. e auxiliary spirits are indispensable to shamans. ey can enlighten them or assist them as their souls journey to the supernatural world (Hultkrantz 1978:20). e auxiliary spirits arrive at the initial stages of the ritual. Shamans can either imitate

54

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

(imitative shamanism) or portray the auxiliary spirits dramatically (demonstrative shamanism). ey can also transform themselves into one of the auxiliary spirits. ese auxiliary spirits can be theriomorphic. Either they bring information from the supernatural world, or their presence is a pre-condition for the voyage of the shamans soul. 4. Ritual ecstasy and trance constitute the method that the shaman employs in order to create contact with the sacred supernatural world (Hultkrantz 1978:1112).49 By applying the strategy of distinction Eliade prefers instead to emphasize a certain essential aspect which distinguishes the shaman from other religious specialists, such as the priest, prophet, diviner, or medicine man (Eliade 1968:2223). Precisely this approach is the only tenable one when a scholar wants to construct a denition of a certain type of religious specialist, because, as we have seen, a particular religious specialist does not master just one religious technique but several. Unfortunately, Eliade does not follow his own strict procedure in his classic book (1968). We must, then, consider which of the three ritual techniques referred to above, possession, vision, or the journey of the soul, dierentiate the shaman from other categories of religious specialists. Having visions of supernatural beings and being possessed by spirits, whether as passive possession (mediumism) or controlled possession (such as the Master of the Spirits), constitute communication techniques which bring about a meeting with deities and spirits in the mundane (human) world. ese communication techniques are, however, quite ordinary, and they are used to contact supernatural beings in cultures all over the world. e vision quest of the indigenous people of the North American Plains was not even undertaken by religious specialists but by ordinary people (Benedict 1922, 1923; Lowie 1963: 170175). Furthermore, countless instances of spirit possession have
Cf. also Sidkys recent extensive denition of the Nepalese jhkri as a shaman (Sidky 2008: 205212). I agree with Sidky that the jhkri is a shaman, but only because he sends his spirit, in a healing ceremony, into the non-human space of Yama lok, the place of Yamarja, the Lord of Death (Sidky 2008:179).
49)

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

55

been documented globally.50 For instance, being possessed by spirits is quite common in Africa, whereas the voyage of the soul is not (de Heusch 1981:156; Ginzburg 1991:249). ese religious techniques are therefore not particularly well suited for constructing the ideal types of shaman and shamanism. e same objection does not, however, apply to the journey to the supernatural world after a ritual. is practice, which is extraordinarily uncommon but is not conned to religious specialists of a denite geographic region (the locus classicus), is reserved for a minority of individuals. It is specically the passage of the soul to the world of the deities and spirits, i.e., to non-human spatial zones, that dierentiates the shaman from other religious specialists. Without drawing the consequences of her reasoning, Siikala admits this: e shamans journey is, however, still a special feature of shamanism and is not connected with other kinds of mediumistic traditions (Siikala 1978:21). Hence, only religious specialists who can journey to non-human spheres should be categorised by the terminus technicus shaman. e details of the so-called shamanistic cosmology a tripartite division of heaven, human world, and underworld vary greatly depending on the particular religious system. ere is, however, a fundamental distinction between what has been called the natural world or human space and the supernatural world or non-human space. For instance, Jean-Pierre Chaumeil (1982) outlines the complex cosmology of the Yagua of northeastern Peru, as it was explained to him in detail and illustrated with a drawing by the religious specialist (i.e., shaman) Alberto, who possessed the ability to travel to supernatural space. e geography of the land of the dead (ancestor spirits) and deities is not known to non-religious specialists and is accordingly categorized as supernatural. As indicated on the map, the Yagua language gives distinct names to the dierent supernatural worlds and to the natural world (earth), i.e., the space where human beings live (Chaumeil 1982:50). We see that a change of place, in a context in which there is a radical dichotomy between mundane (human) and supernatural space, constitutes the fundamental aspect of shamanism.
Cf. for instance research by Erika Bourguignon, referred to in Crapanzano and Garrison (1977:7).
50)

56

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

Various religious specialists may in one way or another establish contact with the world beyond and its supernatural inhabitants. Gods, spirits, or ancestors can manifest themselves in the mundane world after a ritual manipulation by the religious specialist. It is, however, something quite dierent when a mortal human being is capable of setting out on an expedition to the world of the deities and spirits and then of returning to the mundane world. Like other types of religious specialists, the shaman can command various religio-magical techniques,51 but it is the spatial journey which dierentiates the shaman from other religious specialists. Furthermore, it is important to emphasise that the shaman may undertake this voyage not only once but many times during his or her lifetime. Of course, other human beings, too, may visit the worlds of spirits and deities, most commonly through dreams and various states of unconsciousness. Literature and orally transmitted stories in many cultures tell of mortal human beings who have visited the beyond and come back alive. Among examples of this motif we may cite Orpheus descent to the underworld, Vergils experiences in the otherworld, the story of the ascent by Muhammad to heaven, and Dantes descent to hell and ascent to heaven. Nevertheless, the protagonists of these adventures cannot be classied as shamans, because they have all been passively taken or lured to the supernatural world by a deity or spirit. Moreover, they all made this journey on only a single occasion. Only the shaman, through his or her secret knowledge and ability, can embark on numerous voyages between the mundane world and non-human space. Supernatural space is not normally accessible to the common woman or man. Mundane beings, i.e., ordinary people without the religious specialists arcane knowledge inherited and acquired through tradition, are prevented from moving freely to the supernatural world. e same is also true of religious specialists other than the shaman. According to some religious systems, ordinary human beings travel to non-human
He or she may be a clairvoyant, conjurer, diviner, exorcist, fortune teller, healer, holy man, magician, medicine man, medium, necromancer, oracle, prophet, rainmaker, sage, seer, soothsayer, sorcerer, visionary, warlock, wise man, witch doctor, wizard, priest, prophet, or medicine man (Gilberg 1984:21, 24).
51)

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

57

space when they die. is region then serves as their permanent residence. Hence, when life, i.e., existence on earth, is terminated, ordinary people can travel, depending on the cosmology and conceptions of the religious system, to the worlds of either deities or ancestor spirits. Common people do not, however, return to earth again post mortem other than as ancestor spirits. Shamans are exceptional in that only they, as mortal human beings, can make this journey several times during their lifetimes and on their own initiative, i.e., after a ritual. e shamans power and charisma originate from direct, personal contact with supernatural beings in the beyond. It is very important to emphasize that this contact with supernatural beings takes place in the extranatural sphere, and that it arises freely at the initiative of the shaman; it is not forced upon him or her by the spirits and deities. Other types of religious specialists communicate with supernatural beings differently. e dierence lies in the category of space in which the communication with supernatural beings takes place. e shaman is unique by virtue of his or her communication with supernatural beings in the supernatural world. Various religious systems encompass a conception of separate worlds or spheres, a cosmology that contains a belief in upper world(s) or lower world(s) or both. Rudolf Otto (quoted in Eliade 1965:1516) distinguishes between a sacred world, i.e., the world of the spirits and deities, and a profane world, i.e., the world of the human beings. is dichotomy of concepts has rightly been criticized for representing a dualist ideology characteristic of Judaism and Christianity. It can, however, still be useful if we content ourselves with dening the profane world as the visible (mundane) world and the sacred world (supernatural world) as the invisible world, where only a particular class of religious specialists, namely, shamans, can travel. Passage from a mundane to an extranormal condition demands a ritual (Van Gennep 1981 [1909]:2). It is the esoteric ritual that makes it possible for the religious specialist to travel to the supernatural world. e ritual journey of the shaman, and not only his initiation, constitute a rite de passage in which a change of place is fundamental: 1. separation phase, the ritual preparation for ecstasy or trance in the mundane world;

58

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

2. liminal phase, the travel to and residence in supernatural space; and 3. aggregation phase, return to the mundane world.52 e residence of the shaman in the supernatural world is, accordingly, synonymous with the liminal phase of the rite de passage. When the shaman arrives in the beyond, he or she is betwixt and between (Turner 1967:97). is exceptional religious spatial experience represents the fundamental feature of the shaman as a particular category of religious specialist. Jan Bremmer has criticized the hypothesis that the journey of the soul to the beyond is the distinctive feature of shamanism. He writes, Ecstasy and the journey of the soul occur in too many places to be distinguishing traits (Bremmer 1983:48). It is correct that ordinary human beings can possess a free-soul which may leave the body in order to go on a journey in a dream or in another unconscious state. In some cultures the free-souls of ordinary people can travel to the worlds of deities and (ancestor) spirits in an unconscious condition, such as a trance or a coma or during sleep and in dreams. Unlike the shaman, however, those who are not religious specialists cannot decide when they shall go on such a journey. Furthermore, ordinary human beings cannot orient themselves in the geography of preternatural world(s). ey risk either getting lost or being forced by (evil) spirits to reside in supernatural space. In addition, they have only vague memories about what they experience in non-human space. Another essential quality that distinguishes the shaman from ordinary people is that ordinary people do not have specic functions or duties which compel them to undertake journeys to the beyond. e shaman, however, does not simply go on an expedition for his or her
Van Gennep has also observed this fact, but he does not consider the journey to the beyond as typical of the shamans activity: Enn, fait important, mais non pas distinctif du shamanisme, la shamanisation, ou ensemble des actes du shamane lors dune crmonie, comprend la mme squence: transes, mort, voyages de lme dans lautre monde, retour, application au cas spcial (maladie etc.), des connaissances acquises dans le monde sacr (Van Gennep 1981 [1909]:153154). As can be seen from this quotation, Van Gennep conrms the procedure of the ritual but without deducing the logical conclusion.
52)

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

59

own amusement. e voyage of the soul to the supernatural world is made in accordance with the functions and duties associated with the profession of being a shaman. e journey to the supernatural world presupposes that the shaman has certain responsibilities, which other religious specialists cannot fulll because of the special nature of the journey. In this way, a functional dimension (role) becomes incorporated into the denition of shaman. e shaman operates as a mediator between human beings and gods, ancestors and other spirits. By communicating with the deities and spirits in the supernatural world, he or she becomes a diviner. e shaman can also be a psychopomp who guides the soul of the dead to preternatural space. Knud Rasmussens ethnographic eldwork outlines how an Eskimo (Inuit) religious specialist makes a journey to the bottom of the sea in order to propitiate the Spirit of the Sea (also known as Sedna or Sea Goddess) with the intention not only of avoiding misfortunes but also of obtaining certain services and favors, such as securing the supply of game, the return of lost souls, healing of illnesses, and so forth (Rasmussen 1979). e angakoq, i.e., the shaman, of the Inuit can also predict bad weather by traveling to the supernatural world (Benedict 1923:1819). e Tungus shaman travels to the upper world in order to bring animal sacrices to the spirits. He or she does this in order to create direct contact with the spirits and to cure disease (Shirokogoro 1935:310311). When there is a sickness caused by the abduction of a patients soul by evil spirits, the shaman acts as a medicine man. He or she locates the lost soul in the underworld and brings it back to its owner. ere are innumerable examples from various cultures and religious systems of medicine men and women acting as so-called soul doctors. It is crucial, however, that these specialists not be designated as shamans. A key distinction needs to be made here. ese medicine men or healers do nd and bring back the lost soul to the patients body, but in these cases the free-soul has disappeared into the mundane, not the supernatural, world. If the free-soul had been abducted or lost its way in preternatural space, the soul doctor would still be able to call it back, but only by using various ritual techniques, not by travelling to the supernatural world. Only the shaman, by means of a special religio-magical technique, can locate the lost soul in the beyond and

60

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

transport it back to earth in order to re-incorporate it into the body of the patient. ere is also a militaristic form of shamanism, in which combat takes place in the supernatural world between the shaman and witches and spirits. In this case the shaman travels to the supernatural world with the intention of ghting the evil spirits. For example, the free-soul of the Friuli benandanti sometimes left the body transformed as a mouse or a buttery sitting on another animal, such as a cat or a rabbit. It then fought against witches in fertility battles in the underworld. In addition, the Friuli benandanti could meet with the dead in the underworld (Ginzburg 1991:155).53 us, the journey to non-human space in order to conduct important functions for the community is the fundamental characteristic of the shaman. It is this characteristic which distinguishes shamans from other categories of religious specialists. Shamanism: A Conguration within a Religious System e term shamanism is employed by many scholars, in particular by those who conne the shaman geographically to a supposed locus classicus, as a concept to designate the religious system of so-called indigenous cultures with no ties to major traditions, such as Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, Islam, and Judaism.54 Shamanism does not, however, comprise a religion but only a system of beliefs and practices that may exist within a religious system. Within any community or
Other examples of ecstasy, accompanied by a journey to the world of the dead riding an animal or through a transformation into animals in order to ght the dead spirits in fertility battles, are represented by the Ossetic burkudzut, Baltic werewolves, kresniki from the Balkan, and Hungarian tltos (Ginzburg 1991:164, 165166, 171). 54) Pentikinen writes that, as an ism, shamanism is too closely associated with denitions suggested by Christian scholars, and that shamanhood constitutes the mythology, way of life and philosophy of shamanic cultures (Pentikinen 1998a:36). I do not see how the term shamanhood as a synonym of the Russian word samanstvo would constitute a better notion than shamanism, as Pentikinen and Simoncscis (2005:7) suggest. It remains to be explained how indigenous people outside Northern Asia and Europe would feel more comfortable identifying with this concept.
53)

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

61

culture only quite a small minority of individuals hold the position of shaman. Shamanism is associated with these few religious specialists, who carry out esoteric ritual practices and who do not dominate the religious conceptions and practices of the community as a whole.55 Many religious specialists who operate within what has been called shamanistic cultures are not necessarily shamans. Moreover, there are numerous cases in which shamanism coexists with other concepts and ritual practices, such as Christianity or Buddhism (Shirokogoro 1935:276). It is an over-simplication to assert, for instance, that the religion of the Siberian tribes is shamanism. e term shamanism simply implies that one or several religious specialists within a culture know the arcane ritual methods needed to travel to supernatural space in order to perform necessary duties and functions for the benet of the community and its individual members. e shaman is only a part of a larger religious system, the kind of part that Hultkrantz calls a religious conguration (Hultkrantz 1978:11).56 Shamanism does not constitute an independent religion, since to a great extent the mythology, rituals, and institutions of a particular group have little or nothing to do with the shaman.57 Scholars have raised questions not only about the concept religion (cf. for instance Fitzgerald 2000) but also about designations such as Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, Islam, and Judaism. ey fail, however, to realize that these, too, are concepts that should be
Avvakum, the man who introduced the word saman into the Russian language, only described the Tungus shaman, but not shamanism (Kettunen 1998:1). 56) Shamanism does have its own religious or ideological system of belief and practices comprising institutions, myths, symbols, rituals, and so forth that are semiindependent of the general religious complex. It can in some cultures be the dominating ideology within the religious system because powerful shamans quite often tend to be inuential gures. But this is conditioned by the cultural tradition (Siikala 1978: 1213; 1992:19). 57) Consider, e.g., the following statements: Shamanism itself is not, however, a religion, but rather a complex of dierent rites and beliefs surrounding the shaman connected with very dierent religious systems (Siikala 1978:1); shamanism which is primarily found in Siberia and Inner Asia is not a religion but the religious activity connected to the shaman which is present in dierent religious complexes (Siikala 1978:1); gnralement, le chamanisme coexiste avec dautres formes de magie et de religion (Eliade 1968:22).
55)

62

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

perceived as ideal types within an analytic terminology. Partly quoting and partly rephrasing what I have previously written about a denition of the concept religion (Pharo 2007), let me suggest here that rather than employing a dichotomy such as that between the holy or sacred and the profane, which are terms strongly associated with Jewish and Christian paradigms, scholars should instead accentuate the nonhuman/non-natural domain in dening religious phenomena and the concept religion. As an ideal type, religion provides an analytical perspective that is useful in examining human experiences and practices, ways of life, and worldviews. A linguistic polarization between the human and the non-human or non-natural is a reasonable point of departure in dening the term religion. According to my denition, non-human or non-natural elements belong to the religious domain. is domain inuences the lives of people and determines their worldview and experiences in stories or myths, in actions or ritual practices, in the organization of society or the community by socio-political institutions, in the economy, judicial system, structures, space, and concepts of time (Pharo 2007, 2009). Shaman and Shamanism as Constructed Transcultural Concepts in Religious Studies After an examination of central theories concerning the denition of the concepts shaman and shamanism, I have argued that only a methodical, historical-religious analysis of religious rituals can establish a typology of this religious specialist. e shaman is a religious specialist who masters various culturally determined religious techniques that make it possible for him or her to communicate with supernatural beings like deities, ancestors, and spirits in the non-human world. In this way he or she is a direct mediator between the gods, spirits, and ancestors and human beings. Furthermore, the cultural and religious concept of space is fundamental. e ritual techniques concerned make it possible for this particular religious specialist not only to come into contact with representatives of supernatural space but also to obtain favors from them. I have demonstrated that this category of religious specialist is to be identied by the technique(s) that he or she commands. It is important

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

63

to emphasize that this religious specialist, which by historical coincidence has come to be designated as a shaman, is not modeled on any concrete historical individuals but constitutes an abstract concept or an ideal type, i.e., a typological construction made after a comparative analysis of religious specialists found in various cultures around the world. e shaman varies from one culture to another in terms of psychic health, functions, social status, institutions, myths, symbols, rituals, costumes and masks (paraphernalia), and so on. Even if the shaman in any given cultural and religious context has special ritual attributes and symbols which distinguish him or her from other religious specialists, there are no universal shamanic symbols.58 As a consequence, shamanic symbols, myths, rituals, and institutions dier from one religious system to the other, both culturally and historically.59 Constructing cross-cultural religious concepts requires us to consider fundamental issues concerning language and the translation of categories. Within dierent, and sometimes even within the same, religious systems religious specialists designated by various terms from their own language undertake a journey to supernatural space on behalf of either the community or of individuals. It is my contention that such individuals perform a shamanistic religious technique and thereby constitute the analytical category shaman. Accordingly, religious specialists, designated by dierent words in their own languages, are to be categorized by the term shaman. Shamans exist in a variety of cultural and historical contexts, but a fundamental morphological similarity, specically, special esoteric religious techniques, set them apart. is legitimates the use of the transcultural designation shaman. It follows that, according to my
For example, even within the tribe of the Tungus the meaning, origin, function and symbolic signicance vary among the religious specialists (Shirokogoro 1935:303). Siikala maintain that the legends of journey to the other world and meetings with various spirit beings were molded in content and shape according to the shamanic tradition peculiar to each ethnic group (Siikala 1978:23). 59) ere is no pure shamanism (Eliade 1968:27). Shamanism undergoes, as is the case with other cultural-religious phenomena, a process of transformation. is may happen due to the external inuence of other religions and cultures and via social, political and historical changes.
58)

64

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

theoretical classication, shamans and shamanism can be present not only within nomadic small-scale cultures (the locus classicus) but in principle within any type of civilization. Ginzburg asserts that hunting rituals in nomadic cultures can be transformed into fertility rituals in agricultural societies (Ginzburg 1991:164, 165166). In communities of nomadic shepherds shamans fall into ecstasy in order to procure reindeer. eir counterparts in agricultural communities execute the same procedure in order to procure rye, wheat, or grapes, depending on the climate and geographical location (Ginzburg 1991:171). e public or private character of the ritual is of minor signicance. Ginzburg maintains that the shaman in Eurasia conducts ceremonies in public while other rituals are conducted in private (Ginzburg 1991:171 172). e shaman does not only practice on a religious level but also performs among the people of the community. It is therefore important that the scholar be able to identify a belief among the other members of the community according to which a religious specialist can travel to supernatural space after conducting a ritual (Siikala 1978:311). In the absence of this belief the notion of the shaman lacks any religious or social meaning. As we have seen, in addition to having the ability to travel to the supernatural world, the shaman can master several other religious techniques. He or she is exceptional, however, in practicing a very powerful religious technique that enables him or her to achieve direct personal contact with the deities and (ancestor) spirits. e repeated journey between the ontologically dierentiated world(s) sets the shaman apart. His or her religious experience is dierent from that of other human beings, including other religious specialists, and it is this dierent experience which gives the shaman a prestige and charisma that may make him or her a powerful member of the community. e shamans exceptional ability, however, can be ambivalent, because it risks provoking distrust of the shaman among the other members of the community, who may fear that he or she can misuse ritual power in order to carry out harmful actions. Nevertheless, shamans are characterized by their constructive roles and by their activity on behalf of the individual and the community. ey do not conduct dramatic journeys for the sake of their own personal satisfaction. e rituals, symbols, myths, and institutions connected to the activity of the shaman represent the ideology and ritual practices of shaman-

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

65

ism. Following Hultkrantz (1978:11), I accordingly dene shamanism as a conguration within the religious system of a culture. I caution, however, against classifying the religion of a certain people or culture as shamanistic. is constitutes a form of reductionism that will automatically obscure other kinds of religious beliefs and practices within the culture in question. Acknowledgements I would like to extend my thanks to Senior Scientist Sren Wichmann, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig and Leiden University; Professor Jens Braarvig, University of Oslo; Research Fellow Amund Bjrsns, University of Oslo, and an anonymous reviewer for valuable comments and suggestions. References
Arbman, Ernst. 1926. Untersuchungen zur primitiven Seelenvorstellungen mit besonderer Rcksicht auf Indien. Le Monde Oriental 20:85222. . 1927. Untersuchungen zur primitiven Seelenvorstellung mit besonderer Rcksicht auf Indien, II. Le Monde Oriental 21:1185. Benedict, Ruth. F. 1922. e Vision in Plains Culture. American Anthropologist 24:123. . 1923. e Concept of the Guardian Spirit in North America. (American Anthropological Association, Memoirs 29.) Menasha, Wisconsin: American Anthropological Association. Bleeker, C. J. 1973. Man and His Salvation in the Ancient Egyptian Religion. In Man and His Salvation: Studies in Memory of S.G.F. Brandon, ed. Eric J. Sharpe and John R. Hinnells, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 6574. Bogoras, Waldermar. 19041909. e Chukchee. (Publications of the Jesup North Pacic Expedition 7/Memoirs of the American Museum of Natural History 11[12].) New York: G.E. Stechert. Bremmer, Jan. 1983. e Early Greek Concept of the Soul. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Chaumeil, Jean Pierre. 1982. Representation du monde dun chamane Yagua. LEthnographie 8788: 4953. Crapanzano, Vincent. 1977. Introduction. In Case Studies in Spirit Possession, ed. Vincent Crapanzano and Vivian Garrison, New York: Wiley, 140. Czaplicka, Marie Antoinette. 1914. Aboriginal Siberia: A Study in Social Anthropology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

66

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

Devereux, George. 1956. Normal and Abnormal: e Key Problem of Psychiatric Anthropology. In Some Uses of Anthropology: eoretical and Applied, ed. Joseph B. Casagrande and omas Gladwin, Washington, D.C.: Anthropological Society of Washington, D.C., 2348. Eliade, Mircea. 1961. Recent Works on Shamanism: A Review Article. History of Religions 1(1):152186. . 1965. Le sacr et le profane. Paris: Gallimard. . 1968. Le Chamanisme et les techniques archaques de lextase. Paris: Payot. Firth, Raymond. 1967. Tikopia Ritual and Belief. London: George Allen and Unwin. Findeisen, Hans. 1957. Schamanentum, dargestellt am Beispiel der Bessenssenheitspriester nordeurasiatischer Vlker. Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer. Fitzgerald, Timothy. 2000. e Ideology of Religious Studies. New York: Oxford University Press. Foster, George. 1944. Nagualism in Mxico and Guatemala. Acta Americana 2: 85103. Francfort, Henri-Paul, Roberte N. Hamayon, and Paul G. Bahn (eds.). 2001. e Concept of Shamanism: Uses and Abuses. (Bibliotheca shamanistica 10.) Budapest: Akadmiai Kiad. Freidel, David A., Linda Schele, and Joy Parker. 1993. Maya Cosmos: ree ousand Years on the Shamans Path. New York: W. Morrow. Furst, Peter T. (ed). 1972a. Flesh of the Gods: e Ritual Use of Hallucinogens. London: Allen & Unwin. . 1972b. Ritual Use of Hallucinogens in Mesoamerica: New Evidence for Snung from the Preclassic and Early Classic. Religion en Mesoamerica XII Mesa Redonda (Sociedad Mexicana de Antropologia) 7:6168. . 1976. Hallucinogens and Culture. San Francisco: Chandler & Sharp. Garza, Mercedes de la. 1990. Le Chamanisme nahua et maya: Nagual, rves, plantespouvoir. Paris: Guy Trdaniel diteur. Gennep, Arnold van. 1903. De lemploi du mot Chamanisme. Revue de lhistoire des religions 47: 5157. . 1981 [1909]. Les Rites de passage. Paris: E. Nourry. Gilberg, Rolf. 1984. How to Recognize a Shaman among Other Religious Specialists? In Hoppl 1984:2128. Ginzburg, Carlo. 1991. Ecstasies: Deciphering the Witches Sabbath. New York: Pantheon. Hamayon, Roberte N. 1994. Shamanism in Siberia: From Partnership in Supernature to Counter-power in Society. In Shamanism, History and the State, ed. Nicholas omas and Caroline Humphrey, Ann Arbor: e University of Michigan Press, 7689. Harner, Michael J. 1972. e Jvaro, People of the Sacred Waterfalls. London: Robert Hale. (ed.). 1973. Hallucinogens and Shamanism. New York: Oxford University Press.

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

67

Heusch, Luc de. 1981. Why Marry Her? Society and Symbolic Structures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Honko, Lauri. 1969. Role-taking of the Shaman. Temenos 4: 2655. Hoppl, Mihly (ed.). 1984. Shamanism in Eurasia, Vol. 1. Gttingen: Edition Herodot. . 1985. Shamanism: An Archaic and/or Recent System of Beliefs. UralAltaische Jahrbcher 57:121140. Hoppl, Mihly, and Otto von Sadovszky (eds.). 1989. Shamansim Past and Present. 2 Vols. Budapest: Ethnographic Institute, Hungarian Academy of Sciences/Los Angeles: International Society for Trans-Oceanic Research. Hubert, Henri, and Marcel Mauss. 19021903. Esquisse dune orie Gnrale de la Magie. LAnne Sociologique 7:1146. Hultkrantz, ke. 1953. Conceptions of the Soul among North American Indians: A Study in Religious Ethnology. e Ethnographical Museum of Sweden. Monographs series. Publication No. 1. Stockholm. . 1973. A Denition of Shamanism. Temenos. 9:2537. . 1978. Introduction: Ecological and Phenomenological Aspects of Shamanism. In Studies in Lapp Shamanism, ed. Louise Bckmann and ke Hultkrantz (Studies in Comparative Religion 16), Stockholm: Almquist and Wiksell, 935. . 1984. Shamanism and Soul Ideology. In Hoppl 1984: 2836. . 1988. Shamanism: A Religious Phenomenon? In Shamans Path: Healing, Personal Growth and Empowerment, ed. Gary Doore, Boston & London: Shambala: 3341. . 1989. e Place of Shamanism in the History of Religions. In Hoppl and Sadovszky 1989: 4352. . 1998. On the History of Research in Shamanism. In Shamans: Secret World of the Peoples of Siberia ed. Juha Pentikinen et al. (Tampere Museums Publications 45), Tampere: Tampereen museot ja kirjoittajat, 5169. Humphrey, Caroline. 1994. Shamanic Practices and the State in Northern Asia: Views from the Center and Periphery. In Shamanism, History and the State, ed. omas Nicholas and Caroline Humphrey, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 191228. Humphrey, Caroline, and Urgunge Onon. 1996. Shamans and Elders: Experience, Knowledge, and Power among the Daur Mongols. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Hutton, Ronald. 2001. Shamans: Siberian Spirituality and the Western Imagination. London: Hambledon and London. Johansen, Ulla. 1987. Zur Geschichte des Schamanismus. In Synkretismus in den Religionen Zentralasiens, ed. Walther Heissig and Hans-Joachim Klimkeit, Wiesbaden: Harrasowitz, 822. Kendall, Laurel. 1987. Shamans, Housewives, and Other Restless Spirits: Women in Korean Ritual Life. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. Kehoe, Alice Beck. 2000. Shamans and Religion: An Anthropological Exploration in Critical inking. Prospect Heights, Ill.: Waveland Press.

68

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

Kettunen, Harri J. 1998. A Comment on the Discussion of the Term Shamanism (Robert Carlsen et al.). Private manuscript. Klein, Cecelia F., Euologio Guzmn, Elisa C. Mandell, and Maya Staneld-Mazzi. 2002. e Role of Shamanism in Mesoamerican Art: A Reassessment. Current Anthropology 43(3):383419. Kroeber, Alfred L. 1907. e Religion of the Indians of California. (University California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 4, no. 6.) Berkeley: University Press. Lessa, William A., and Evon Z. Vogt. 1979. e Purposes of Shamanism. In Reader in Comparative Religion: An Anthropological Approach, ed. William A. Lessa and Evon Z. Vogt, New York: Harper & Row, 301302. Lvi-Strauss, Claude. 1962. Le Totemisme aujourdhui. Paris: Presses universitaire de France. Lewis, Ioan M. 1984. What is a Shaman? In Hoppl 1984:313. . 1989. Ecstatic Religion: A Study of Shamanism and Spirit Possession. London: Routledge. . 1996. Religion in Context: Cults and Charisma. New York: Cambridge University Press. Lowie, Robert H. 1963. Indians of the Plains. Garden City: National History Press. Madsen, William. 1955. Shamanism in Mexico. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology. 9:4854. Nadel, S. F. 1946. A Study of Shamanism in the Nuba Hills. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 76:2537. Nelson, Enid. 1995. Gendered Possession and Communicaton among the Rejang of Sumatra, Indonesia Circle 67:199215. Noll, Richard. 1983. Shamanism and Schizophrenia: A State-Specic Approach to the Schizophrenia Metaphor of Shamanic States. American Ethnologist 10(3):443459. Ohlmarks, ke. 1939. Studien zum Problem des Schamanismus. Lund: Gleerup. Ortiz de Montellano, Bernhard R. 1990. Aztec Medicine, Health, and Nutrition. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press. Paulson, Ivar. 1958. Die primitiven Seelenvorstellungen der nordeurasischen Vlker: Eine religionsethnographische und religionsphnomenologische Untersuchung. (Monograph Series 5.) Stockholm: Statens etnograska museum. Pentikinen, Juha. 1998a. Shamanism and Culture. Helsinki: Etnika. . 1998b. e Shamans and Shamanism. In Shamans: Secret World of the Peoples of Siberia ed. Juha Pentikinen et al. (Tampere Museums Publications 45), Tampere: Tampereen museot ja kirjoittajat, 2950. Pentikinen, Juha and Pter Simoncscis (eds). 2005. Shamanhood: An Endangered Language. Oslo: Novus. Pharo, Lars Kirkhusmo. 2001. Underskelse av way-hieroglyfen (T539) i inskripsjoner hos mayaene fra den klassiske perioden (ca. 200ca. 900 e.Kr.). En kritisk analyse av sjamanisme, nagualisme og tonalisme. [An Investigation of the Way-Hieroglyph

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

69

(T539) in the Inscriptions of the Classic Maya Culture (c. 200900 AD): A Critical Analysis of Shamanism, Nagualism and Tonalism]. Norwegian Magister Artium dissertation, University of Oslo. . 2007. e Concept of Religion in Mesoamerican Languages. Numen 54 (2007): 2870. . 2009. Implications of Translations of Religiously Neutral Concepts in Describing a Religious System: A Semantic Analysis of Colonial Dictionaries of Nahuatl and Yucatec. Historiographia Linguistica 36(2/3):345360. . Forthcoming. Transformations, Manifestations and Identity: An Analysis of the Concepts of Shamanism, Nagualism, Ritual Impersonation, Tonalism and the Notion of the Soul in Mesoamerican Religions. Pike, Kenneth L. 1954. Language in Relation to a Unied eory of the Structure of Human Behavior. Glendale, California: Summer Institute of Linguistics. . 1999. Etic and Emic Standpoints for the Description of Behavior. In e Insider/Outsider Problem in the Study of Religion, ed. Russell T. McCutcheon, London and New York: Cassell, 2836. Rasmussen, Knud. 1979. A Shamans Journey to the Sea Spirit. In Reader in Comparative Religion: An Anthropological Approach, ed. Willliam A. Lessa and Evon Z. Vogt, New York: HarperCollins, 308311. Reichel-Domato, Gerardo. 1975. e Shaman and the Jaguar: A Study of Narcotic Drugs among the Indians of Colombia. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. Schmidt, P. Wilhelm. 19121955. Der Ursprung der Gottesidee: Eine historisch-kritische und positive Studie. Mnster: Aschendorsche Verlagsbuchhandlung. Schrder, Dominik. 1955. Zur Struktur der Schamanismus. Anthropos 50:848 881. Shirokogoro, S. M. 1935. Psychomental Complex of the Tungus. London. 1935. Sidky, H. 2008. Haunted by the Archaic Shaman: Himalayan Jhkris and the Discourse on Shamanism. Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books. Siikala, Anna-Leena. 1978. e Rite Technique of the Siberian Shaman. (FF Communications 220.) Helsinki: Suomalainen tiedeakatemia. Silverman, Julian. 1967. Shamans and Acute Schizophrenia, American Anthropologist, 69(1): 2131. Sternberg, Leo. 1925. Divine Election in Primitive Religion. In Proceedings of the Twenty-First International Congress of Americanists, Part II. Gteborg, August 2026, 1924, ed. D. Albers, e Hague: [Brill], 472489, 502512. Tedlock, Barbara. 1992. Time and the Highland Maya. Albuquerque: University New Mexico Press. . 2005. e Woman in the Shamans Body: Reclaiming the Feminine in Religion and Medicine. New York: Bantam Books. Turner, Victor W. 1967. e Forest of Symbols: Aspects of Ndembu Ritual. Ithaca. N.Y.: Cornell University Press. Vajda, Lszl. 1959. Zur phraseologischen Stellung des Schamanismus. Ural-altaische Jahrbcher 31:456485.

70

L. K. Pharo / Numen 58 (2011) 670

. 1964. Zur phraseologischen Stellung des Schamanismus. In Religionsethnologie, ed. Carl August Schmitz, Frankfurt: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, 265295, 436443. Vitebsky, Piers. 2001a. e Shaman: Voyages of the Soul: Trance, Ecstasy and Healing from Siberia to Amazon. London: Duncan Baird. . 2001b. Shamanism. Norman, Okla.: University of Oklahoma Press. Vogt, Evon Z. 1969. Zinacantan: A Maya Community in the Highlands of Chiapas. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Voigt, V. 1977. Shamanism in Siberia. Acta Etnographica 26:385395. . 1984. Shaman Person or Word? In Hoppl 1984: 1321. Waida, Manabu. 1983. Problems of Central Asian and Siberian Shamanism. Numen 30:215239. Weber, Max. 1969. Objectivity in Social Science and Social Polity. In Max Weber on the Methodology of the Social Sciences, trans. and ed. Edward A. Shils and Henry A. Finch, New York: Free Press, 49112. Winkelman, Michael. 1990. Shamans and other Magico-Religious Healers: A Cross-Cultural Study of their Origins, Nature and Social Transformations. Ethos 18(3):308352. . 1992. Shamans, Priests and Witches: A Cross-Cultural Study of MagicoReligious Practioners. (Anthropological Research Papers 44.) Tempe: Arizona State University. . 2000. Shamanism: e Neural Ecology of Consciousness and Healing. Westport, Conn.: Bergin and Garvey. Znamenski, Andrei A. 2004. Shamanism: Critical Concepts in Sociology. 3 vols. London: Routledge. . 2007. e Beauty of the Primitive: Shamanism and the Western Imagination. Oxford. Oxford University Press.