You are on page 1of 54

Gas-Liquid separators

Roberto Bubbico PhD, Chem. Eng. Department of Chemical Engineering Sapienza University of Rome bubbico@ingchim.ing.uniroma1.it

INTRODUCTION
In phase separation, two or more phases can be separated because a given force will act differently on them, or because one of the phases impacts on a solid barrier. The forces are usually gravity, centrifugal, and electromotive. Examples are removal of a solid from a liquid by impaction (filtration), gravity (settling), centrifugal force (cyclones or centrifuges), and the attraction of charged particles in an electrostatic precipitator.

INTRODUCTION
One exception to these mechanisms is drying by evaporating unbonded water from a solid. In this case, separation of a liquid from a solid occurs by mass transfer. Since many component separations require contacting two phases, like liquid-liquid extraction, component separation is frequently followed by phase separation. Phase separators can be classified according to the phases in contact: liquidgas, liquid-liquid, liquid-solid, solid-gas,

INTRODUCTION
In many cases separators will also have the role of accumulators, with the aim of reducing fluctuations in flow rate, pressure and/or composition (improving process control) Where the carryover of some fine droplets can be tolerated it is often sufficient to rely on gravity settling in a vertical or horizontal separating vessel (K-O drum or knockout pot).

INTRODUCTION
Reasons for using gas-liquid or vapor-liquid separators are: to recover valuable products, improve product purity, reduce emissions, protect downstream equipment, ... Gas-liquid separators are used after flashing a hot liquid across a valve (flash drum)

INTRODUCTION
The forces acting on a liquid droplet suspended in a gas are: gravity (acting FG = M L g downward) buoyancy (acting upward) drag (acting upward).

FB =
FD =

M L V g

2 2 C D D pUV V

INTRODUCTION
From a force balance: net gravity force = drag force FG = FD The relative velocity is given by:

UT =

4 gD p ( L V ) 3CD V

INTRODUCTION
The drag coefficient C is a function of the Reynolds number:

GU T D p Re =

Depending on the Reynolds number, the terminal velocity can be defined further: Re>500 Re<2 2<Re<500 (Newtons law) (Stokes law)
U T = 1.74
2

gD p ( L G )

UT =
UT =

gD p ( L G )

1.14

3.54 g 0.71D p

( L G )0.71

G 0.29 0.43

INTRODUCTION
As a matter of fact, the terminal velocity is calculated as:

UT = K

( L V )
V

where K is an empirical constant which depends on properties of the fluids, design of the separator, size of the drops, vapor velocity, degree of separation required

INTRODUCTION
In general around 95 % separation of liquid from vapor is accomplished by an empty drum If greater separation efficiencies are required, or very small drops need to be separated an uneconomically large separator should be used Very small drops (down to 1 m) can be separated by impaction using a wiremesh pad located at the top of the separator

INTRODUCTION
Entrained liquid drops in the vapor impact on the wires and coalesce until the drops become heavy enough to break away from the wire and fall to the bottom of the separator The use a wire-mesh mist eliminator, installed near the vapor outlet allows to get separation efficiencies of about 99.9% or greater

INTRODUCTION
The mesh usually consists of 0.011 in (0.279 mm) diameter wires interlocked by a knitting machine to form a pad from 4 to 6 in (0.102 to 0.152 m) thick. Because of the large free volume of the pad - 97 to 99 % - the pressure drop across the pad is usually less than 1.0 in of water

INTRODUCTION
The sizing of a separator depends on the value of the empirical constant K (or KD). The value of KD is largely influenced by the presence of internals. Normally, the value provided by the internals manufacturer should be assumed In the absence of manufacturer data, literature data can be used

INTRODUCTION

INTRODUCTION
The value of K also depends upon the operating pressure

INTRODUCTION
For horizontal separators, the separation efficiency depends on the total vapor travel length within the vessel.

INTRODUCTION
A longer vessel makes it easier to remove liquid droplets. The values of K usually reported for a horizontal vessel, refer to a vessel length of 3.05 m. A typical design K value for horizontal separators is defined as 0.56 L KD = K 3.05

INTRODUCTION
For a two-phase vaporliquid separator, both vertical and horizontal configurations are used, and the selection should be made on a case-by-case basis Vertical separators have the advantage of lower space requirement and easy-toinstall control systems, but horizontal drums are typically smaller for high liquid loading service

INTRODUCTION
In a horizontal separator, with an increase in liquid level, the area of the vapor space is reduced and the possibility of liquid entrainment increases In a vertical separator the vapor-flow area remains constant and liquid entrainment is not an issue

INTRODUCTION
For a relief KO drum, the horizontal separator is popular simply because of the use of split flow. In this design, one inlet nozzle is used at the vessel center with two outlets on either side. This split-flow advantage is available only in horizontal separators

Horizontal separators
Advantages: Separation efficiency higher than for a vertical separator The only choice for a single inlet and two vapor outlets Easy to design for three-phase separation More suitable for handling large liquid volumes Disadvantages: It requires a footprint area larger than a vertical one At high liquid levels, the liquid entrainment rate progressively increases with the increase in liquid level

Vertical separators
Advantages: The liquid surface area does not change with liquid height: liquid entrainment is reasonably constant It requires a smaller footprint area Easier to install level instruments, alarms, and shutdown systems Usually more efficient for high vapor/liquid ratios Disadvantages: Not suitable for three-phase separation Less suitable for high liquidvapor ratios

Vertical separators design


The separator diameter must be determined first The gas velocity must be low enough to allow the liquid droplets to settle out

Vertical separators design


After defining the maximum droplet diameter, the critical gas velocity Uv can be calculated: the minimum vessel diameter is given by:

Uv = Kv

(L V )
V

Dv =

4Q v U v

Dv=minimum vessel diameter, m Qv=gas, or vapour volumetric flow-rate, m3/s Kv= 0.07 m/s if a demister pad is used, and 0.15*0.07 without a demister pad, m/s

Vertical separators design


The height of the vessel is composed of a number of terms: droplet settling length: it is the length from the center line of the inlet nozzle to the bottom of the mist eliminator.
0.75 D or a minimum of 12 in (0.305 m), or alternatively a length equal to the diameter or a minimum of 3 ft (0.914 m)

Vertical separators design


height from the bottom of the inlet nozzle to liquid surface: it is required to prevent nozzle flooding.
a minimum of 6 in (0.152 m) from the bottom of the nozzle to the liquid surface or a minimum of 12 in (0.305 m) from the center line of the nozzle to the liquid surface 12 in (0.305 m) plus 1/2 of the inlet nozzle outside diameter or 18 in (0.4570 m) minimum 0.5 D or 2 ft (0.610 m) minimum.

Vertical separators design


If a mist eliminator is present (demister pad), the following lengths must be added: thickness of the mist eliminator (usually 6 in (0.152 m)) an additional 12 in (0.305 m) above the eliminator to obtain uniform flow distribution across the eliminator (if it is too close to the outlet nozzle, most of the flow will be directed to the center of the eliminator, with reduced efficiency)

Vertical separators design


the liquid height: an appropriate residence time of the liquid (surge time) is required to dampen variations in the liquid flow rate.
2 to 5 min sometimes 10 min is selected.

Vs = QLts

VS HS = 2 ( / 4)DV

Vertical separators design


there is a minimum liquid height required to prevent a vortex from forming. The design of the separator will have to include a vortex breaker. The minimum liquid level should cover the vortex breaker plus an additional liquid height
2 ft (0.61 m) should generally suffice

The volume of the dished heads is not included in the design procedure

Vertical separators design


Calculation procedure for vertical separators
1. Select Kv based on the vessel configuration 2. Calculate the maximum gas velocity, Uv 3. Calculate the cross-sectional area and diameter, A and Dv 4. Round off D in 6 in (0.152 m) increments, starting at 30 in (0.762 m). If D is less than 30 in (0.762 m), use standard pipe.

Vertical separators design


5. Select a liquid-phase surge time, ts 6. Calculate the liquid-level height 7. Calculate the total separator height. Round off L in 3 in (0.0762 m) increments, for example, 5.0, 5.25, 5.5, 5.75 ft etc. 8. If L/D < 3.0, then recalculate L so that L/D > 3.0 by letting L/D = 3.2. If L/D > 5 use a horizontal separator.

Vertical separators

Horizontal separators design


Differently from a vertical separator, in the design of a horizontal separator the vessel diameter is not independent of its length.

Horizontal separators design


The vessel diameter and length, and the liquid level, must allow for: sufficient vapour residence time for the liquid droplets to settle out, and the required liquid hold-up time to be met avoid liquid re-entrainment from the liquid surface allow enough space for the feed distributor and the mist eliminator

Horizontal separators design


The vapor velocity might be larger than the drop terminal velocity, with the condition that:

> drop

with = residence time and drop= separation time KV = 0.125 ft/s (0.038 m/s) no mist pad; KV = 0.437 ft/s (0.133 m/s) with demister

Horizontal separators design


In other words:

L U AH

HV UV

U AH

L UV HV

where UAH= vapor velocity UV= critical drop velocity HV= height for vapor flow

Horizontal separators design


Since the upward drag of the vapor is practically absent in a horizontal drum, the empirical coefficient K is the same as for vertical vessels but multiplied by a factor of 1.25 The vapor velocity must be compared with the maximum velocity to avoid entrainment:
L Ue = V V g ( L V ) L
4 2

0 .1

Horizontal separators design


The most economical length to diameter ratio will depend on the operating pressure As a general guide the following values can be used

Operating pressure, bar 0-20 20-35 >35

Length/diameter, L/D 3 4 5

Horizontal separators design


For preliminary designs, set the liquid height at half the vessel diameter: hv = Dv/2 and fv = 0.5
where fv is the fraction of the total cross-sectional area occupied by the vapour

In general the minimum cross-sectional area for gas flow should be at least 20 % of the total cross-sectional area

Horizontal separators design


In the presence of a mist eliminator, the main concern is avoiding its flooding because of a rising liquid level The distance from the bottom of the mist eliminator to the liquid level should be at least - 2 ft (0.152 - 0.610 m) and should not be below the center of the separator A further distance of 12 in (0.3048m) must be allowed above the eliminator (6 in (0.152 m) thick)

Horizontal separators design


Assuming the liquid level at the center of the separator, the above rules result in a minimum diameter of 5.5 ft (1.68 m)

Horizontal separators design


Preliminary calculation procedure (no.1, see example)
1. Select Kv (e.g. 0.07*0.15) 2. Calculate the maximum vapor velocity, UV 3. Calculate the cross-sectional area, A, assuming half total area 4. Assume a L/D ratio (e.g. 4) 5. Calculate D by equating residence time of the vapor and time to settle out for the liquid. 6. Calculate L. 7. Select a liquid phase surge time and check for the actual liquid residence time 8. Adjust the vessel diameter and repeat calculations

Horizontal separators design


Calculation procedure for horizontal separators (no.2)
1. Select Kv 2. Calculate the maximum vapor velocity, UV 3. Calculate the cross-sectional area, A 4. Calculate D. Round off D in 6 in (0.152 m) intervals, starting at 30 in (0.762 m). If D is less then 30 in (0.762), use standard pipe.

Horizontal separators design


5. Select a liquid phase surge time, ts 6. Calculate the separator length. Round off L in 3 in (0.0762 m) intervals (for example, in feet, 5.0, 5.25, 5.5, 5.75 etc.) 7. If L/D < 3.0, then recalculate L so that L/D > 3.0 by setting L/D = 3.2. If L/D > 5.0, then recalculate D so that L/D < 5.0 by setting L/D = 4.8

Horizontal separators design


A more accurate calculation procedure (no.3)

1. 2. 3.

Calcolo Calcolo Calcolo

QV = WV / V
Q L = WL / L
UT = K

L V V

U V = 0,75U T

(in questo caso K non tiene conto dello snebbiatore)

Horizontal separators design


A more accurate calculation procedure (no.3) 4. 5. Fisso TH

V H = TH Q L

Fisso L/D (con 1.5<L/D<6) e un grado di riempimento: calcolo un diametro di I tentativo

4(VH ) D= 0,6( L / D )
(corrisponde ad assumere

1/ 3

VH = 60%VT

Horizontal separators design


A more accurate calculation procedure (no.3) 6. 7. La sezione totale:

AT =

D 2
4

Fisso il livello minimo di liquido HLL (da tabelle) oppure: HLL = 0.5 D + 7 (D=ft, HLL=in) con un minimo di HLL=9 in per D < 4 ft

Horizontal separators design


8. Noto HLL/D, calcolo ALL/AT e ALL in alternativa, con x= ALL/AT e y= HLL/D :
1 1

x = cos (1 2 y ) (1 2 y ) y y
2

Horizontal separators design


9. HV=max (0,2D; 1 ft) (senza demister) HV=max (0,2D; 2 ft) (con demister) Da HV/D calcolo AV/AT e quindi AV 10. Calcolo la L richiesta dallhold-up liquido
VH L= AT AV ALL

Horizontal separators design


11. Calcolo il tempo di caduta (drop-out time):
drop
HV = UV

12. Calcolo la velocit del vapore: U VA = QV / AV

Horizontal separators design


13. Verifico che la velocit ottenuta sia minore di quella di trascinamento:
Ue = L V V g ( L V ) L
4 2

0 .1

14. Calcolo la lunghezza minima richiesta per labbattimento del liquido:


Lmin = UVA drop

Horizontal separators design


15.

L<Lmin (differenza < 20%) => pongo L=Lmin (labbattimento del vapore controllante) Se L<<Lmin si incrementa HV e si riparte da 9. Se L>Lmin => OK Se L>>Lmin (hold-up controllante) si pu aumentare Lmin e ridurre L diminuendo HV (se maggiore del minimo in 9.) Se

Horizontal separators design


16. Si verifica L/D.
Se L/D>6 => si aumenta D e si riparte da 6. Se L/D<1.5 => si riduce D e si riparte da 6.

17. Si calcola il peso totale del recipiente (costo). Si varia il diametro D facendo variare 1.5<(L/D)<6 e si trova il rapporto ottimale

Horizontal separators design


18. Una volta identificate le dimensioni ottimali si calcolano le altezze effettive:
ANL=ALL+VH/L Da ANL/AT e quindi HNL HHL=D-HV.

You might also like