Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Calculating the WACC under the classical tax system for the company as a whole and for each division of the company Current capital structure vs. target capital structure How to use a peer group to estimate divisional equity beta
Company Background
Lodging
Contract Services
41%
46%
51%
33%
Restaurants
13%
16%
Investment projects were selected by discounting the cash flows by the appropriate hurdle rate for each division The executive compensation plan would reflect hurdle rates, making managers more sensitive to Marriotts performance and capital market conditions
EVA in essence
We use the after tax WACC under the classical tax system for Marriott Corporation
The target debt ratio is 60%, and the debt costs 1.30% +8.72% = 10.02% (See Tables A&B) We will ignore the difference between floating rate vs. fixed coupon rate debts here The floating rate debt will be studied in Investments elective
The historical equity beta was 1.11 (see Exhibit 3) Can we use this beta directly?
If the target and the historical debt ratios are similar, we could. Otherwise, we have to adjust the beta. The beta was estimated as 1.11 at the time when the debt/total capital ratio was 0.497 (based on the average between 83-87). However, the target debt ratio was 60%, see Table A. The adjustment can be done by first finding the un-levered beta for Marriott, and then adjust for the target debt capital ratio. In doing so, we need to assume that the beta of debt is zero, or you could find the beta of debt by regression.
The formula
a
E D e d DE DE
The beta of debt is typically small. Without any further information, lets assume it is zero. Thus, the assets beta is =0.503*1.11=0.558 After adjusting for the target debt ratio, the beta of equity for Marriott should be 0.558/0.4 = 1.396
Choosing t = 44%, the effective tax rate from 1983-88 based on Exhibit 1, WACC 0.4 *19.09% 0.6 *(1 44%) *(8.72% 13%) . 1100% . However, using a single hurdle rate imposes a systematic bias on project selection. Risky projects appear more profitable, and less risky projects appear less profitable.
For the calculation of the WACC for lodging division, see the spreadsheet.
Estimating the costs for many sources of capital is not very precise. In practice, we often make simplifying assumptions.
Non-interest-bearing liabilities, such as accounts payable, are excluded from calculation of WACC to avoid inconsistencies and simplify the valuation. There are other long-term liabilities (such as pension funds liabilities), which are often too complicated to infer the required rate of return. There is no definitive answer to the question.