Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Critique Peer Review Rubric F13
Critique Peer Review Rubric F13
who developed PowerPoint __________________________ Name of student critiquing PowerPoint________________________ Use the tool below to evaluate another students PowerPoint presentation by ranking each grading element on a 1 5 scale as noted below. While positive, courteous feedback is expect, it is very important to provide an indepth and critical analysis of the students work. 1. To what extent were ALL of the assignment elements addressed as required in the instructions provided by faculty. 1- Poor Comments: 2-Fair 3-Adequate 4-Very Well 5-Extremely well
2. To what extent was the content on the slides clear and understandable. 1- Poor Comments: 3. To what extent did the aesthetics enhance delivery of content? The presentation should be ranked in terms of its visual appealbut only if the graphics, colors, charts, etc. actually ENHANCED retention of the information. 1- Poor Comments: 4. Given the limitations of conveying information via slides (e.g., bullet points are expected), to what extent did the presentation conform to APA format, standard grammar, punctuation, spelling, etc. 1- Poor Comments: 2-Fair 3-Adequate 4-Very Well 5-Extremely well 2-Fair 3-Adequate 4-Very Well 5-Extremely well 2-Fair 3-Adequate 4-Very Well 5-Extremely well