Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Marketers know strong brands are important but arent always sure how to build one. CBBE model was designed to be
comprehensive cohesive well-grounded up-to-date actionable
Basic premise: Power of a brand resides in the minds of customers Challenge is to create the right brand knowledge structures - ensure customers have the right types of experiences with products and services through their marketing programs:
Thoughts Feelings Images Perceptions Attitudes
3
Customers own brands Dont take short cuts with brands Brands should have a duality rational and emotional Brands should have richness - resonance Brand resonance provides important focus
4
CBBC model is useful as Road map /guidance for brand building Yardstick to assess progress / weaknesses and strengths Guide for marketing research effort
Positive CBBE - gets a positive response from consumers Negative CBBC - evokes a negative response Differential effect on consumer response to the marketing of the brand (because of brand knowledge),
(if there is no differential effect, it is a commodity and competition will be based on price)
2.
3.
Because of Customer brand knowledge the result of marketing and previous experience with the brand Which causes Customer response to brand marketing reflected in the perception, preferences and behavior related to all aspects of the marketing
CBBE represents the added value endowed to a product as a result of past investments in the marketing of a brand.
Hence CBBE provides direction and focus to future marketing activities
It provides focus and guidance to interpret the past marketing programs and design of future marketing programs
BE as direction for the future Consumers decide where the brand can go and where it cannot because of brand knowledge created over time - dictates the future direction for the brand..
The true value and Future prospects of the brand rests with the consumer
Brand Recall
Attributes
Product-Related (e.g., color, size, design features)
Brand Knowledge Types of Brand Associations Brand Image Favorability, Strength, and Uniqueness of Brand Association Benefits
Functional Symbolic
Experiential
The associations are categorized as Brand awareness and familiarity strength of the memory
The ability to identify the brand and recall it and To recall it under many different conditions a perception about a brand as reflected by the band associations
2.
Strong, favorable, and unique brand associations (brand Image) in memory determines the differential response (meaningful differences) which makes up BE.
Learning Advantage for formation of brand associations Consideration advantage puts brand on the consideration set Choice advantage particularly with Low involvement goods
2.
3.
Learning Advantages influences the formation of brand associations that make up the brand image. The nature of the brand node affects the different kinds of associations to become attached in memory It is the first step in building BE and the choice of brand elements make the process easier or more difficult
Consideration Advantages thinking of the brand, when making purchase decisions, when the brand is acceptable. Raising awareness increases the likelihood of the brand being on the consideration set. (Part-list-cuing says it reduces the likelihood of other brands not being there)
Lack purchase ability to judge product quality. Heuristics (shortcut) will be used and the brand which they are familiar with will be chosen)
increases familiarity with the brand. useful for brand recognition more than for brand recall (Important to reinforce brand name with all brand elements)
Marketing programs that link strong favorable associations to the brand in memory And other sources of information
Marketer controlled sources of info Distribution channel, company, person, place or events Info from other sources / WOM Brand Experience Assumptions and inferences from the brand
Strength of Brand Associations Consumer beliefs about brand attributes are formed in may ways
Personal experience information creates the strongest brand attributes and benefit association (important to decision making) WOM and other non-commercial sources of information forms the next strongest associations Company created sources of information creates weakest associations (advertising)
Strength of Brand Associations depends on how marketing programs affect brand experience
quantity and quality of processing (more deeply a person thinks about the information and relates it to existing brand knowledge, stronger the associations)
Relevance of the information Consistency with which the information is presented over time
The context in which the brand is considered and The retrieval cues that are present and serve as reminders
Strength of Brand Associations depends on how marketing programs affect brand experience
Companies create strong brand associations through a variety of means Creative communication - brand related information is related to existing knowledge Repeated exposure - over time and space, so that retrieval cues are present as reminders All marketing programs and brand activities chosen must affect the strength of brand associations
How relevant consumers find the brand associations How distinctive they find the association How believable they find the associations
Actual and potential ability of the product to perform Current or future prospects of communicating the performance Sustainability of the actual or communicated performance over time.
Effectively delivered
Cost of delivery, and Time necessary for to create / change desired associations?
Unique brand associations should not give reasons for customers not to buy the brand therefore consider both
Points of difference - meaningful points of difference the reason to buy - the associated USP Points of parity be as good as the competition on other associations (to negate the potential points of difference of competitors)
USP - product related / non product related attributes or benefits (user type, usage situations)
Differences can be communicated
explicitly by direct comparison with competitors Or implicitly highlighted without a competitive point of reference
Not all associations are viewed as important, or viewed by consumers (Color of Fed Ex) Nor are they equally valued across all purchase or consumption occasions (Christmas cards by Fed Ex)
1. IDENTITY =
SALIENCE
27
Salience Dimensions
28
Performance Dimensions
Primary characteristics and supplementary features Product reliability, durability, and serviceability Service effectiveness, efficiency, and empathy Style and design Price
29
Imagery Dimensions
User profiles Demographic & psychographic characteristics Actual or aspirational Group perceptions - popularity Purchase & usage situations Type of channel, specific stores, ease of purchase Time (day, week, month, year, etc.), location, context of usage Personality & values Sincerity, excitement, competence, sophistication, ruggedness History, heritage, & experiences Nostalgia Memories
30
Judgment Dimensions
Brand quality Value Satisfaction Brand credibility Expertise Trustworthiness Likability Brand consideration Relevance Brand superiority Differentiation
31
Feelings Dimensions
32
Resonance Dimensions
Behavioral loyalty Frequency and amount of repeat purchases Attitudinal attachment Love brand (favorite possessions; a little pleasure) Proud of brand Sense of community Kinship Affiliation Active engagement Seek information Join club Visit web site, chat rooms
33
ConsumerBrand Resonance
Consumer Judgments
Consumer Feelings
Brand Performance
Brand Imagery
Brand Salience
34
PRIMARY CHARACTERISTICS & SECONDARY FEATURES PRODUCT RELIABILITY, DURABILITY & SERVICEABILITY SERVICE EFFECTIVENESS, EFFICIENCY, & EMPATHY STYLE AND DESIGN PRICE
USER PROFILES PURCHASE & USAGE SITUATIONS PERSONALITY & VALUES HISTORY, HERITAGE, & EXPERIENCES
35
Performance
0.65
Judgment
0.49
0.17
0.66
Resonance
Imagery
0.24
0.58
Feelings
36