Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • EDCA ECF 105 2013-04-02 - Grinols V Electoral College - 9th Cir Order Denying Writ Petition

    Uploaded by

    Jack Ryan
    104 views1 page
    04/01/2013 105 ORDER of USCA #13-70744, Petitioners have not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of this court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. Accordingly, the petition is denied. No further filings will be entertained in this closed case.(Reader, L) Modified on 4/2/2013 (Reader, L). (Entered: 04/02/2013)

    Original Title

    EDCA ECF 105 2013-04-02 - Grinols v Electoral College - 9th Cir Order Denying Writ Petition

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    04/01/2013 105 ORDER of USCA #13-70744, Petitioners have not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of this court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. Accordingly, the petition is denied. No further filings will be entertained in this closed case.(Reader, L) Modified on 4/2/2013 (Reader, L). (Entered: 04/02/2013)

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    104 views1 page

    EDCA ECF 105 2013-04-02 - Grinols V Electoral College - 9th Cir Order Denying Writ Petition

    Uploaded by

    Jack Ryan
    04/01/2013 105 ORDER of USCA #13-70744, Petitioners have not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of this court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. Accordingly, the petition is denied. No further filings will be entertained in this closed case.(Reader, L) Modified on 4/2/2013 (Reader, L). (Entered: 04/02/2013)

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    Case: 13-70744 04/01/2013 ID: 8572746 DktEntry: 2 Page: 1 of 1 Case 2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Document 105 Filed 04/01/13 Page 1 of 1

    FILED
    APR 01 2013

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

    U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

    In re: JAMES GRINOLS; et al. JAMES GRINOLS; et al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO, Respondent, ELECTORAL COLLEGE; et al.,

    No. 13-70744

    Real Parties in Interest.

    Before: PREGERSON, GRABER, and BEA, Circuit Judges. Petitioners have not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of

    Fr

    ie

    nd s

    this court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See Bauman v. United States Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, the petition is denied.

    No further filings will be entertained in this closed case. DENIED .

    KS/MOATT

    of

    Th e

    Fo

    gb

    ORDER

    ow

    D.C. No. 2:12-cv-02997-MCE Eastern District of California, Sacramento

    .c o

    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

    You might also like