Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Archive of SID: Eisenia Foetida
Archive of SID: Eisenia Foetida
/ 09190-111 :
( )Eisenia foetida
* 9
1
99/9/61 : 99/65/52 :
3 3 311
D
I
55 . 3 36
. 1
S
f
1 6 . 11 1/511/5
. 15 35 9/1
. ( 4 )
o
e
( 1 ) ( 3 ) .
( )P<5/51 15 .
v
i
h
( 178) (
166/4) ( 5/3) ( 1/36)
( )1/36 .
.
: ()Eisenia foetida
c
r
-10 2-3
(Edwards Mason
.)1991 Annelidae
* drshamsaie@gmail.com :
990
www.SID.ir
09
( )1551 William
( Manson
( )
)1555 (Sherman
)1553
88/7/1
3 () 113
D
I
15/5-11
( 111)
pH=6/8-7/1
( .)1553 Sherman
. 1-18
1 1
S
f
o
e
( .)1381
( )1381
iv
h
c
55 .
4555 1
. 1 6
GFC-1 18
r
A
999
www.SID.ir
09
5 8
5/5 15 .
( )SGR
( )DGR ( )CF
15
11
Excel
1/511/5
3 1
89/1/15 15
:1
35
155
D
I
9/1
- Ln Ln
()
S
f
1 9 5
o
e
()CF
()DGR
v
i
h
SPSS
c
r
36 3 .
. 1
15
17-15 15-15
14-15 .
999
www.SID.ir
:3
155
()SGR
:1
11
09
)
-9(
1
3855
1456
5/37
19555
8115
5/18
19755
58575
11355
5/11
57155
3955
1316
5/34
7711
5/16
18855
11455
5/1
58335
3855
1368
5/36
8578
5/18
11155
5/11
D
I
11-18
(5/1
pH
6-8
6/5
15 .
11
( 1 )
1 4391 .
S
f
o
e
15
7-8
( 8) 1-5 .
v
i
h
9191
-1
Fs
c
r
()TW
**145/156
61/35b
()TL
41/555
13/17
**144/547
1/59b
()SGR
136/731
4/77
()CF
5/988
()DGR
**
**
1/68
** * 5/51 .5/55
+
71/17
13/73
1/81
5/85
1/79
Fs 1
( )P<5/51
15
( )P<5/55
991
www.SID.ir
09
9191
-1
Fs
()TW
**311/115
158/55b
()TL
**18/775
17/43b
18/17
()DGR
143/489
3/11
3/83
()SGR
3/517
3/77
3/95
3/353ns
1/54b
1/13
()CF
119/6
**
ns
** 5/51 .5/55
*
D
I
SGR
( )P<5/51 ( 1
) a
( )P<5/51
S
f
o
e
15 .
v
i
h
9191
-4
Fs
()TW
**394/564
()TL
45/554
()DGR
94/873
1/95
()SGR
4/118
1/17
**36/511
1/69b
15/8
**
()CF
c
r
151/15b
**
ns
** 5/51 .5/55
*
186/98
11/75
3/81
1/45
1/81
9191
-1
Fs
()TW
**168/733
114/33b
166/41
()TL
54/749
15/51
17/85
()DGR
31/636
4/14
5/35
()SGR
ns
1/555
1/18
1/36
()CF
ns
5/985
1/19
1/36
**
**
b
b
991
www.SID.ir
09
** * 5/51 .5/55
-991
D
I
1 1
( 1 )
Eisenia foetida
S
f
o
e
8 .
v
i
h
c
r
. ( )1551 Beetz
Eisenia foetida
catfish
15 . 95
35
)1558( Loan
994
www.SID.ir
09
( )P<5/51
15
( .)1
15
( 1 .)5
D
I
S
f
o
e
15
v
i
h
-1 . .1381 . ( ) . .
194 .
-1 .1381 .
1 .35
c
r
( ) .
4.EIFAC, IUNS and ICES. 1980. Report of working group on standardization of methodology
in fish nutrition research. 2, 26-32.
5.Loan, P., 2008. An Giang university, Vietnam. Earthworm as a main protein source for
1(3), 6-14.
9.Pereira, O.J. and Gomes, E.F., 2004. Growth of rainbow trout fed a diet supplemented with
earthworms, after chemical treatment. Aquaculture International Journal 33, 54-65.
991
www.SID.ir
09
10.Preston, T.R., Latsamy, P., 2008. Fly larvae, earthworms and duckweed as feeds for frogs in
an integrated farming system. Living Aquatic Research Center Tosoly, UTA. Colombia.
45(2): 101-134p.
11.Sherman, R., 2003. Raising earthworms successfully. N. Carolina st. UNI. 26pp.
12.William, T., 2002. Earthworm biology and production. UNI. of Florida. 2(103), 1-4.
D
I
S
f
o
e
v
i
h
c
r
991
www.SID.ir
09
Producing possibility of earth worm (Eisenia foetida) in warm water fish farms in
order to apply in common carp feeding
*M. Shamsaei Mehrjan1 and Sh. Amini1
Dept. of Fisheries, Faculty of Natural Resources, Islamic Azad University,
Sciences and Research, Tehran Branch
Abstract2
To investigate the possibility of using two-purpose warm water fish farms to produce earth worm
as a live food, an experiment was conducted which 3 tons of organic fertilizer were used in it for
worm culture. The fertilizer was divided among 3 plots with 112 m dimension. 50 worms were
introduced to each quadratic meter of fertilizer surface as early stock. 36 Kg earth worm was
produced through 3 months in fertilizers. The effects of reared worms on growth of common carp
(Cyprinus carpio) were studied during a 2 months period and in CRB with 2 treatments and 6
repeats. The plots were 12 net cages with 1.511.5 meter dimension without bed. 10 fry were
introduced to each plot. The initial weight and length of fries were respectively 30 g and 91 mm.
commercial food (4%) and mixture of earth worm and commercial food (1% worm + 3%
commercial food) formed the treatments. The results showed very significant differences between
2 treatments about length, weight and Daily Growth Rate (DGR), (P<0.01) but about Specific
Growth Rate (SGR) significant differences were observed only through early 15 day of
experiment. The best averages of total length (278 mm), weight (266.4 g), DGR (5.3 g), SGR
(2.36%) and coefficient of fatness (1.36) were shown in mixture food treatment. The results
showed that integrated carp and earth worm producing in farms are totally possible.
D
I
S
f
o
e
v
i
h
c
r
A
*
991
www.SID.ir