Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 06
Chapter 06
Chapter Outline
The Nature of Strategy Analysis and Choice A Comprehensive Strategy-Formulation Framework The Input Stage
Fred R. David Prentice Hall
Ch 6-2
Chapter Outline
The Matching Stage
The Decision Stage
Ch 6-3
Chapter Outline
The Politics of Strategy Choice The Role of a Board of Directors
Ch 6-4
Ch 6-5
Ch 6-6
Ch 6-7
Ch 6-8
Ch 6-9
Ch 6-10
Formulation Framework
Internal Factor Evaluation Matrix (IFE)
Input Stage
Ch 6-12
Formulation Framework
TOWS Matrix
SPACE Matrix
Stage 2: The Matching Stage
BCG Matrix
IE Matrix
Matching Stage
Ch 6-14
Matching Key Factors to Formulate Alternative Strategies Key Internal Factor Key External Factor Resultant Strategy
Formulation Framework
TOWS Matrix
SPACE Matrix
Stage 2: The Matching Stage
BCG Matrix
IE Matrix
Matching Stage
Ch 6-17
TOWS Matrix
Ch 6-18
SO Strategies
SO Strategies
Ch 6-19
WO Strategies
WO Strategies
ST Strategies
ST Strategies
Ch 6-21
WT Strategies
Defensive tactics aimed at reducing internal weaknesses and avoiding environmental threats.
Ch 6-22
WT Strategies
TOWS Matrix
Steps in developing the TOWS Matrix
1.
2. 3.
4.
List the firms key external opportunities List the firms key external threats List the firms key internal strengths List the firms key internal weaknesses
Ch 6-23
TOWS Matrix
Developing the TOWS Matrix
5. 6. 7. 8.
Match internal strengths with external opportunities and record the resultant SO Strategies Match internal weaknesses with external opportunities and record the resultant WO Strategies Match internal strengths with external threats and record the resultant ST Strategies Match internal weaknesses with external threats and record the resultant WT Strategies
Ch 6-24
TOWS Matrix
Leave Blank Strengths-S
List Strengths
Weaknesses-W
List Weaknesses
Opportunities-O
List Opportunities
SO Strategies
Use strengths to take advantage of opportunities
WO Strategies
Overcome weaknesses by taking advantage of opportunities
Threats-T
List Threats
ST Strategies
Use strengths to avoid threats
Fred R. David Prentice Hall
WT Strategies
Minimize weaknesses and avoid threats
Ch 6-25
Formulation Framework
TOWS Matrix
SPACE Matrix
Stage 2: The Matching Stage
BCG Matrix
IE Matrix
SPACE Matrix
Strategic Position and Action Evaluation Matrix
Ch 6-27
SPACE Matrix
Two Internal Dimensions
Ch 6-28
SPACE Matrix
Overall Strategic position determined by:
Financial Strength [FS] Competitive Advantage [CA] Environmental Stability [ES] Industry Strength [IS]
Ch 6-29
SPACE Matrix
Developing the SPACE Matrix:
EFE Matrix IFE Matrix Financial Strength Competitive Advantage Environmental Stability Industry Strength
Fred R. David Prentice Hall
Ch 6-30
SPACE Matrix
Select variables to define FS, CA, ES, & IS Assign numerical ranking from +1 (worst) to +6 (best) for FS and IS; Assign numerical ranking from 1 (best) to 6 (worst) for ES and CA. Compute average score for FS, CA, ES, & IS
Fred R. David Prentice Hall
Ch 6-31
SPACE Matrix
Plot the average scores on the Matrix Add the two scores on the x-axis and plot point on X. Add the scores on the y-axis and plot Y. Plot the intersection of the new xy point. Draw a directional vector from origin through the new intersection point.
Ch 6-32
SPACE Factors
Internal Strategic Position External Strategic Position
Ch 6-33
SPACE Factors
Internal Strategic Position External Strategic Position
Competitive Advantage CA
Market share Product quality Product life cycle Customer loyalty Competitions capacity utilization Technological know-how Control over suppliers & distributors
Ch 6-34
SPACE Matrix
Conservative
FS
+6 +5 +4 +3 +2
Aggressive
+1
CA
-6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 -1 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 +6
IS
-2
-3
-4
-5 -6
Fred R. David Prentice Hall
Defensive
Competitive
ES
Ch 6-35
Formulation Framework
TOWS Matrix
SPACE Matrix
Stage 2: The Matching Stage
BCG Matrix
IE Matrix
BCG Matrix
Boston Consulting Group Matrix
Enhances multidivisional firms efforts to formulate strategies Autonomous divisions (or profit centers) constitute the business portfolio Firms divisions may compete in different industries requiring separate strategy
Fred R. David Prentice Hall
Ch 6-37
BCG Matrix
Boston Consulting Group Matrix
Graphically portrays differences among divisions Focuses on market share position and industry growth rate Manage business portfolio through relative market share position and industry growth rate
Fred R. David Prentice Hall
Ch 6-38
BCG Matrix
Relative market share position defined:
Ratio of a divisions own market share in a particular industry to the market share held by the largest rival firm in that industry.
Ch 6-39
BCG Matrix
Relative Market Share Position
High 1.0 Medium .50 Low 0.0
High +20
Stars II
Medium 0
Question Marks I
Dogs IV
Ch 6-40
BCG Matrix
Ch 6-41
BCG Matrix
Question Marks
BCG Matrix
Stars
BCG Matrix
Cash Cows
Ch 6-44
BCG Matrix
Dogs
Low relative market share position and compete in slow or no market growth
Ch 6-45
Formulation Framework
TOWS Matrix
SPACE Matrix
Stage 2: The Matching Stage
BCG Matrix
IE Matrix
Popular tool for formulating alternative strategies All organizations (or divisions) can be positioned in one of four quadrants
Based on two evaluative dimensions:
2.
3.
4.
5. 6.
Quadrant II Market development Market penetration Product development Horizontal integration Divestiture Liquidation
1.
2.
3.
4.
5. 6. 7.
Quadrant I Market development Market penetration Product development Forward integration Backward integration Horizontal integration Concentric diversification
5.
Quadrant III Quadrant IV Retrenchment 1. Concentric diversification Concentric diversification 2. Horizontal diversification Horizontal diversification 3. Conglomerate diversification Conglomerate diversification 4. Joint ventures Liquidation SLOW MARKET GROWTH
Fred R. David Prentice Hall
Ch 6-48
Excellent strategic position Concentration on current markets and products Take risks aggressively when necessary
Ch 6-49
Ch 6-50
Strong competitive position Slow-growth industry Diversification indicated to more promising growth areas
Ch 6-52
Formulation Framework
Ch 6-53
QSPM
Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix
Only technique designed to determine the relative attractiveness of feasible alternative actions
Ch 6-54
QSPM
Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix
Tool for objective evaluation of alternative strategies Based on identified external and internal crucial success factors Requires good intuitive judgment
Ch 6-55
QSPM
Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix
List the firms key external opportunities & threats; list the firms key internal strengths and weaknesses
Assign weights to each external and internal critical success factor
Ch 6-56
QSPM
Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix
Examine the Stage 2 (matching) matrices and identify alternative strategies that the organization should consider implementing Determine the Attractiveness Scores (AS)
Ch 6-57
QSPM
Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix
Compute the total Attractiveness Scores Compute the Sum Total Attractiveness Score
Ch 6-58
QSPM
Key External Factors Economy Political/Legal/Governmental Social/Cultural/Demographic/ Environmental Technological Competitive
Key Internal Factors Management Marketing Finance/Accounting Production/Operations Research and Development Computer Information Systems
Strategic Alternatives
Weight Strategy 1 Strategy 2 Strategy 3
Ch 6-59
QSPM
Limitations:
Ch 6-60
QSPM
Positives:
Sets of strategies examined simultaneously or sequentially Requires the integration of pertinent external and internal factors in the decision-making process
Ch 6-61
Ch 6-62
Ch 6-63
Politics in organizations:
Key Terms
Aggressive quadrant Attractiveness Scores (AS) Board of Directors Boston Consulting Group (BCG) Matrix Business portfolio Cash cows Champions Competitive Advantage (CA)
Fred R. David Prentice Hall
Ch 6-67
Key Terms
Competitive quadrant Conservative quadrant Culture Decision stage Defensive quadrant Directional vector Dogs Environmental Stability (ES) Financial Strength (FS)
Fred R. David Prentice Hall
Ch 6-68
Key Terms
Grand Strategy Matrix Halo error Industry Strength (IS) Input stage Internal-External (IE) Matrix Long-term objectives Matching Matching stage Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix (QSPM)
Fred R. David Prentice Hall
Ch 6-69
Key Terms
Question marks Relative market share position SO strategies ST strategies Stars Strategic Position and Action Evaluation (SPACE) Matrix Strategy-formulation framework
Fred R. David Prentice Hall
Ch 6-70
Key Terms
Sum total attractiveness scores Threats-Opportunities-WeaknessesStrengths (TOWS) Matrix Total Attractiveness Scores (TAS) WO strategies WT strategies
Ch 6-71