MONITORING FFQs- students, family, staff (3outcome, 3impact) # servings local in lunchroom (3O) Farmer Survey (1I) Kid,

Kid, parent, staff survey on knowledge and appreciation (2I) Trash monitoring, (audit?) (4o) Special studies o Do kids like food o Ease for farmers and kitchen staff o Teacher focus group OUTCOME Staff use more local food o Lunch menu o Purchase order More students participate in programs o Attendance sheets o Survey Students, family and staff consume more healthy foods o FFQ o Staff/kids: mean # servings of regional foods picked by kids in lunchroom Decreased plate waste o Average weight of trash (1 day observations) o Trash audit? IMPACTS Increased $ for farmers, fishermen, and food purveyors o Survey o Total economic benefit (sales/purchase order) Greater knowledge and appreciation of regional food systems and nutrition for students and families o Survey Improved nutrition for students, families and staff o Survey on consumption (existing- ffq) Questions for Asta: - M&E budget? - Though not explicitly stated in WEFFIT goals or action plan, are partners interested in teacher and kitchen staff knowledge/attitude change? We recommend including these parties in order to gain depth of insight into Impacts/benefits. Monitoring this information could also prove beneficial for troubleshooting programmatic aspects along the way. - Similarly, what interest is there in documenting process? (as opposed to exclusively impact) - How feasible would it be to contact farmers/fishers with either a survey or interview? - questions about dissemination (less pressing)

- School stats: total enrollment, # classrooms/grade - Update on progress of project and M&E to date - Lessons taught in schools: what is the structure for classroom visits and grade-level units? - logistics of taste tuesday