The document discusses task-based language instruction. It begins by defining task-based instruction as engaging learners in meaningful goal-oriented communication through problems, projects, and decisions. While the language used is not prespecified, tasks can be designed so that completing the goal requires specific linguistic forms or strategies. Early developments reflected principles of communicative language teaching, with many roots tracing back to work by Prabhu in the 1980s that used tasks as the foundation for a communicative curriculum.
The document discusses task-based language instruction. It begins by defining task-based instruction as engaging learners in meaningful goal-oriented communication through problems, projects, and decisions. While the language used is not prespecified, tasks can be designed so that completing the goal requires specific linguistic forms or strategies. Early developments reflected principles of communicative language teaching, with many roots tracing back to work by Prabhu in the 1980s that used tasks as the foundation for a communicative curriculum.
The document discusses task-based language instruction. It begins by defining task-based instruction as engaging learners in meaningful goal-oriented communication through problems, projects, and decisions. While the language used is not prespecified, tasks can be designed so that completing the goal requires specific linguistic forms or strategies. Early developments reflected principles of communicative language teaching, with many roots tracing back to work by Prabhu in the 1980s that used tasks as the foundation for a communicative curriculum.
Task-based instruction is characterized by activities that engage lan-
guage learners in meaningful, goal-oriented communication to solve problems, complete projects, and reach decisions. Tasks have been used for a broad range of instructional purposes, serving, for example, as units of course syllabi, activities for structure or function practice, and lan- guage focusing enhancements to content-based curricula. Although the language used to carry out a task need not be prespecified, a task can be designed so that attaining its goal depends on linguistic and commu- nicative precision, or requires the use of specific grammatical forms (e.g., Ellis, 2003; Loschky and Bley-Vroman, 1993). The communica- tion strategies and learning processes that emerge during task goal attainment are consistent with those advanced in second language acqui- sition (SLA) theory and found in SLA research. Demands on the learn- ers’ attention, comprehension, and production as they carry out a task that can lead them to test L2 hypotheses, obtain feedback on their com- prehensibility, draw inferences about L2 rules and features, and produce more accurate and developmentally advanced output.
E A R LY D E V E L O P M E N T S
Early developments in task-based instruction reflect principles and
practices of communicative language teaching, many of which remain in effect to date. A role for tasks was implicit in communicative lan- guage teaching from its inception, revealed, for example, by Allwright (1979), who described ways in which instructional activities could pro- mote development of language for authentic use rather than knowledge of language as an unapplied system. Most of the field of language edu- cation looks to Prabhu’s work in Bangalore, India in the 1980s as the first large-scale project to use tasks as the foundation for instruction within a communicative curriculum (Beretta and Davies, 1985; Prabhu, 1987). Prabhu advanced the idea that task participation could facilitate L2 structure learning without a need to focus on structures themselves, as the need for task completion and goal attainment would create
N. Van Deusen-Scholl and N. H. Hornberger (eds), Encyclopedia of Language and
Education, 2nd Edition, Volume 4: Second and Foreign Language Education, 71–82. #2008 Springer Science+Business Media LLC.