THBT the UN should have a standing army Starting Story

Plan of Action
Military Capabilities: A Rapid Action Force well equipped for any situation Israel and the 5-day war Recruiting: Need to apply and not drafted, Oath, Pay, the Top from Non SC Therefore motivated unlike the drafted and donated peace troops Funding: Location: Neutral Country, Politically Stable, Buy Land (For example Mauritius) The kick: Long term peacekeeping missions (for example, in Cyprus or Bosnia) might still be undertaken by detachments volunteered by individual states, while the UN Standing Army might be deployed to deal with short-term crises.

Case Division 1) More effective in operations themselves 2) Imposing a Balance between the Powerful and the Weak 3) Ideally suitable to respond quickly Arguments (Proposition) More effective in operations themselves a. The current army is not an army, its a joke a. Korean War (Authority for US to go into war) b. Supplied by developing nations who hope to make profits from payments i. Under equipped and badly trained c. Forces from major powers are provided sparingly unless there is an incentive for them b. A standing army would be better prepared a. Training & greater motivation because they apply

b. Equipment c. Better command and control (No cultural and linguistic barriers) d. For example the French Foreign Legion and the Indian Army Sub Point: a. Would Be Cost Effective a. Collectively countries will reduce their military spending b. War disrupts trade and damages global economy c. If there is confidence that war can be avoided more long-term investment b. Modern Warfare is against Organization a. Terrorism is the new war b. Need to be quick and alert c. Always Prepared