State Vs Metzger FACTS: Metzger lived in a garden-level apartment located in Lincoln, Nebraska.

A large window in the apartment faces a parking lot which is situated on the north side of the apartment building. At about 7:45 a. m. on April 30, 1981, another resident of the apartment, while parking his automobile in a space directly in front of Metzger's apartment window, observed Metzger standing naked with his arms at his sides in his apartment window for a period of 5 seconds. The resident testified that he saw Metzger's body from his thighs on up. The resident called the police department and two officers arrived at the apartment at about 8 a. m. The officers testified that they observed Metzger standing in front of the window eating a bowl of cereal. They testified that Metzger was standing within a foot of the window and his nude body, from the mid-thigh on up, was visible. Contention of the People: Metzgers action was in violation of Lincoln Municipal Code 9.52.100 which states: It shall be unlawful for any person within the City of Lincoln ... to commit any indecent, immodest or filthy act in the presence of any person, or in such a situation that persons passing might ordinarily see the same. Contention of the Accused: The ordinance, as drafted, is so vague as to be unconstitutional. The laws must be clear and concise to individuals to where they must not interpret the law one way or another; laws may not be so vague to cast a net to catch both the innocent and guilty. Ruling: The conviction was reversed. Since the ordinance in question is criminal in nature, it is a fundamental requirement of due process of law that such criminal ordinance be reasonably clear and definite.