Professional Documents
Culture Documents
اثر استخدام استراتيجية المتشابهات في اكتساب المفاهيم العلمية والاحتفاظ بها لدى طالبات الصف التاسع الاساسي
اثر استخدام استراتيجية المتشابهات في اكتساب المفاهيم العلمية والاحتفاظ بها لدى طالبات الصف التاسع الاساسي
20071428
7
8
3
4
5
6
test T
10
T.test
11
12
T.test
"Z""U"
"Z" "U"
T.Test
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
96:2002
62:2004
o
o
o
15:2003
192:2003
106:2002
192:2003
17:2003
19:2003
107:2003
96:2002
66:2003
20:2003
499:1999
135:2003
71:2004
V
E5
E7
117:2000
283:2000
(12:1998
135:1998
255:2002
Pragmatic
Semantic
Structural
Concertizing Function
Structurizing Function
An Active
Assimilation Function
283:2000
255:2002
Visualisation
45:1998
( Compound Analogies )
AIDS
Narrative Analogies
HP
VERBAL
PICTORIAL
LEVEL OF ENRICHMENT
SIMPLE
ENRICHED
EXTENDED
EXPLANATION
STRATEGY LDENTIFICATION
ANALOGICAL LIMITATION
260:2002
Compound Analogies
Narrative Analogies
Peripheral Analogies
Procedural Analogies
55:2002
[Thiele and Treagust, 1994, 234-238]
Format
Verbal
Pictorial
Level of Enrichment
Simple
Enriched
Extended Analogies
Analog Explanation
Analogical Limitations
[Solomon, 1994, 373]
Analog Format
Analog type
Structural
Surface
(Lawson, 1993, 1213)
(Dagher, 1995)
Compound Analogies
aids
Aids
Narrative Analogies
Procedural Analogies
48:1998
extended
49:2002
Student's
Characteristics
Student's Characteristics
Familiarity with Analogy
Prior Knowledge about the topic
Analogical Reasoning Ability
C is to --F-----?
A is to B as
Bird is to A as Fish is to --C-----?
48:1998
Piagetian Cognitive Level
Visual Imagery
Kekule)
Cognitive Complexity
Integrating Structure
Discrimination Structure
Instructiona Variables
Complexity of the Analogy
Degree of Concreteness of
Analog
Physical
Pictorial
Number of the Analogues Included in the Analog.
Format of Presenting the Analog
Mixed Format
Separate Format
Student Self- Developed Analog Strategy
Guided Teaching Strategy
Expository - Teaching Strategy
Medium of presenting the
Analog
258:2002
.?(D) is to C as B is to A
Air is to bird as ..is to fish? (water)
Radford
Synectics
Gordon
Gordon
Synectics
Synectics
Syntax for making the strange familiar
Substantive Input
Direct Analogy
Personal Analogy
Comparing Analogies
Explaining Differences
Exploration
Generating Analogy
:
Analysis of the learning material of the topic
1985
13:1998
(9:1998
230:1999
672002
78:2004
29:2006
78:2004
682002
792004
682002
792004
68:2002
79:2004
solomon
(1993
80
60
1998 2000 2000 2000
Clement (1994 Brown)
B 1999BBrown2002
(1992BBrown) 1993
Solomon19982000 B
1994
(
(
1993
80
2002B
199820002006
2006
B
1999
1999Tahsin
80
1995BRanner) 1999B
1999Tahsin
1994palmer1999
BTahsin
1995BRanner(1999Palmer)1999
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
1-
1987
:
2006
44
53
44
83 100X44 100X
53
2
2
.
46)
BB
4321
46
46
B
46
40
SPSS
3
0.362
A1
0.338
A4
0.526
A6
0.381
A9
0.309
*0.322
*0.351
**0.415
**0.567
*0.353
**0.425
*0.371
*0.358
*0.338
**0.415
**0.443
**0.493
**0.405
A11
A13
A19
A20
A23
A24
A27
A30
A32
A35
A36
A37
A39
A43
4
*0.327
A2
*0.381
A7
*0.360
A10
*0.352
A12
**0.643
A15
**0.463
A17
*0.377
A22
**0.409
A25
**0.405
A26
*0.378
A31
**0.442
A33
**0.659
A34
*0.316
A38
**0.401
A44
*0.387
A45
**0.394
A46
5
**0.395 A3
**0.506
A5
*0.345
A8
**0.536 A14
*0.305 A16
*0.363 A18
**0.417 A21
**0.583 A28
**0.503 A29
*0.334 A40
*0.386 A41
*0.325 A42
6
6
0.871
0.476
0.795
0.483
0.632
0.813
9
7
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.36
0.45
0.27
0.27
0.45
0.55
0.36
0.64
0.27
0.36
0.55
0.55
0.27
0.27
0.27
0.36
0.27
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.59
0.68
0.59
0.64
0.59
0.59
0.68
0.41
0.45
0.64
0.59
0.32
0.55
0.55
0.36
0.68
0.59
0.50
0.64
0.50
0.59
0.59
0.68
24
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.55
0.36
0.45
0.27
0.55
0.36
0.55
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.45
0.45
0.36
0.45
0.36
0.36
0.45
0.36
0.64
0.45
0.55
0.73
0.27
0.55
0.59
0.41
0.64
0.64
0.64
0.55
0.64
0.73
0.64
0.68
0.41
0.64
0.59
0.55
0.55
0.50
0.64
0.59
(0.73 0.27
9
10
)
test T
0.582
0.158 14.025
40
0.221 14.05
40
T.test independent sample
T.test
2.297
7.57 40
0.630 0.483
Mann-
12Whitney Test
12
"Z""U"
Z
U
138
12.54
11
115
10.45
11
9.41
0.768
49
11
149.5
13.59
11
12.86
11
10.14
11
111.5
11
123 11.18
11
Z
0.233
57
130
11.82
(Mann-Whitney) Test
13
13
"Z""U"
Z
U
44.5 142.5
-1.067
110.5
57
123
-0.238
130
56
131
-0.325
122
12.95
133
12.09
120
10.91
-0.429
54
10.05
11.18
11.82
11.91
11.09
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
Z
T.test independent)
(sample
14
T.test
2.89
7.1 40
1.425
2.07
6.3 40
2.56
5.55 40
0.892
1.60 5.125 40
1.89
3.65 40
1.695
1.37 3.025 40
6.08
16.3 40
1.698
3.24 14.45 40
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
BB
BB (2006/10/4)
2006/11/22)
B
2006/11/25
2006/12/16
T.test
d
o
o
o
o
o
o
15T.test Independent Sample
15
4.31
2.78
5.83
5.17
5.77
14.92
40
2.91
12.17
40
2.36
12.52
40
2.53
9.32
40
1.64
8.75
40
2.32
6.43 40
5.84
36.2
40
6.93
27.93
40
2
16
0.2
2
D
17
D
4.31
78
5.83
78
5.17
78
5.77
78
2002
19982000
0.05
18Mann-Whitney Test
18
"Z""U"
Z U
2.70
2.21
1.50
-2.47
167
15.18
11
86
7.82
11
11
11
11
11
20
23
164
14.91
11
89
8.09
11
.647 2.706
.550
2.213
.361
1.503
605
2.473
Clement
19931993)
0.05
20Mann-Whitney Test
"Z""U"
Z
3.09
3.30
2.49
3.32
U
14
10.5
23
10
173
15.72
11
80
7.27
11
176.5
16.04
11
76.5
6.95
11
164
14.90
11
89
8.09
177
16.09
11
11
76
6.90
11
Z
.706
3.1
.732
3.30
.608
2.49
.734
3.33
1993Clement 1993)
0.05
22T.test paired sample
22
1.778
0.530
1.433
1.554
2.786 14.925
40
2.769 14.850
40
2.364 12.525
40
2.253 12.475 40
1.645 8.750
40
1.588 8.700
40
5.841 36.200
40
5.600 36.025
40
(Clement 1993) Brown1994(2002
o
o
www.gbland-
info/up3/c3b93862laigif)
v
* Brown,D.E (1992): "Using Examples And Analogies To
Remidiale Misconceptions in physics: Factors In fluencing
conceptual change" Journal of Research in science Teaching,
Vol.29, No.1, PP(17-34).
*Brown, De (1994): "Facilitaing conceptual change vsing
Analogies and Explamatory Models", Imt..Jour. sci.educ.
,Vol.16, No.2, PP(201-214).
*Clement,John (1993): Using Bridging Analogies And
Anchoring Intuitions to Deal With Students Preconception in
physics," Journal of Research In science Teaching, Vol.30,
No.10, PP(1241-1257).
*Dagher.Z.R(1995): Review Of Studes On The
Effectiveeness Of Instructional Analogies In science
Teaching, Vol.79, No.3, PP(295-312).
*Khalid, Tahsin(1999): "The Study Of Pre-Servece Teacters
Alternative Conceptions Regarding Three Ecological Issues,
Paper Presented At The Annual Meeting Of "Neural
Associaition For Research In Science Teaching, PP(28-31).
*Kruger,Colim&Summer,Mike(1998):
Primary
School
Teachers Under Studing Of Journal Of Research In Science
Teaching< Vol.14, No.3, PP(259-265).
*Kliener,C.S(1991): The Effects of Synecties Tranind On
Student Creativity And Achievement In Science , Dissertion
Abvstract Inter National, Vol.52, No.3.
*Lawson,D.L.Lawson, A E(1993):"Neural Principles of
memory and neural Theory of Analogical in sight, Journal of
Research in science Teaching, Vol.30, No.10, PP(13271348).
*Meador,K.S.(1994):"The effect of sy ncetics traing on gifted
and non gifted kinde-garten student", Jornal os the Education
of the gifted, Vol.18, No.1.
CO2
>@
24
1
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
10
34
11
35
12
36
13
37
14
38
15
39
16
40
17
41
18
19
42
43
44
21
45
22
46
23
20
11
;
;
;
;
;
Supervised by:
Dr. Fatheya Sobhy Al Lulu
Associate Professor in Scince Mathology and Curricula
2007/1428
Abstact
The science concepts stand for a significant object of
science learning and teaching methodology objects, because of
its occupying a prominent postion at the science scale and
structure, and its acquiring properly helps the students to
explain the Scientific phenomena and practice the Scientists,
behaviour at predicting and controlling the Scientific
phenomena So the study aimed at recognizing the impact of
using the analogical strategy on acquiring the Scientific
concepts of science subject for ninth grade female student in
Gaza. The study problem was defined in the following dead
question: What is the impact of using the analogical strategy on
acquiring the Scientific concepts of science subject for ninth
grade female student in Gaza?.
And in order to answer the study problem question, the
following hypotheses were composed:
- Ther is no statical difference at (a 0.05) level that due to
using the analogical strategy between the marks average of the
experimental group and the controlled group at the scienific
concepts test.
- Ther is no statical difference at (a 0.05) level that due to
using the analogical strategy between the marks average of the
highly female student of the experimental group and the
controlled group at the scienific concepts test.
- Ther is no statical difference at (a 0.05) level that due to
using the analogical strategy between the marks average of
female student who are depressed in educational achievement
in oth the experimental and the controlled groups at the
scienific concepts test.
- Ther is no statical difference at (a 0.05) level that due to
using the analogical strategy between the marks average of
female student of the experimental group at the direct
dimensional implementtation of the achievement test and the
postponed dimensional implementtation of the same test.
The researcher used the experimental method where the stydy
samplewas chosen from ninth grade female students of Hasan
Salama Preparatory School in Gaza in the study year of (20052006). The students sample size was 80 female students where
they were divided in to tow groups: the experimental and the
controlled groups. The independent variable was subjugated
(using the analogical strategy) by examination and measuring
its impact on the subsequent variable (the scientific concepts)
And accomplish the study objectives, the researcher composed
the scientific concepts,s test, a teacher guide and the student,s
activity book. After testing its validity and durability, the test
was implemented before examination on both the experimental
and the controlled groups and sfter the study implementation
the researcher used T.Test and Mann Witney test inorder to
recognize the difference denotation between the highlyachieved student and the depressed students in both groups at
the scientific concepts test.
The results were:- Ther are statistical difference at (a 0.05) level that due to
using the analogical strategy between the marks average of the
experimental group and the controlled group at acquiring the
scienific concepts in favor of the experimental group.
- Ther are statistical difference at (a 0.05) level that due to
using the analogical strategy between the marks average of the
highly-achieved female student of the experimental group and
those of the controlled group at acquiring the scienific concepts
in favor of the experimental group.
- Ther are statistical difference at (a 0.05) level that due to
using the analogical strategy between the marks average of the
experimental group female student who are depressed students
of the controlled group at acquiring the scienific concepts in
favor of the experimental group.
- Ther are statistical difference at (a 0.05) level that due to
using the analogical strategy between the marks average of
female student of the experimental group in the direct
dimensional implementtation of the achievement test and the
postponed dimensional implementtation of the same test.