) (10557

-
.056363310 .
"

09.09.09

,
, " " " " ,
.
" " ,
, , , ,
.
,
,
.
, .
30 15 , , 15 - .

, 30 .
.
,
, ,
.

,
, ,
, ,
, .
, , ,
, , .

.
,
Hoschild, .
((1989 ,
" " -
, .
""
,50/50
""
"" ,
.(Brehm,(1985
- ,
." , "
. ""

. - (1996) ,
,

.
) (Equity Theory ,

, "" ,
3

 . , ,
.

, .
,
: , ,
, ,
. , (1992) ,

, ,
, "-" ,
,
,
.

,
,
,(Blair & Lichter (1991); Gunter & Gunter (1990, 1991) Thompson (1991
.
,
. , ,
, .
, ,
,
, , , ,
.
) , , ( ,
.
.(Thompson, (1991
,
.
, /
, ,

 ,
,
,(Sered (1994
, ,(1992 ),
.
, ,
.

.
)"( , .
(2003), )"(

. ,
"" "
-"" ," ,
,
, ,
.
"
, .

, ,
, ,
,""
.
(2003) ,
,
,

, .
, .
(2003) ,
, ,
, , .
5


,

.

,
,
"" ,

, ,

(Ehrensaft ,(1987); haas (1980,1982

,
.
) Risman, Johnson-Sumerford, (1998
,
.
,
,
. ,
,


, ,
. ,
, ,
.
, , ,(1992) , ,

,
" " (Buunk &Vanyperen, (1991 ; .
:(Gunter&Gunter,(1990,1991 , , (1992) ,

,
.
6

 (Denmark et al (1985); Krauz (1986) ; Berado et al (1987 :

: ,
' ""
, , , ,
'.
:
,

,
" " "" .

. )
'(

.
,
.
:
. :
.
. .
. .

: 60 30 15 ,
15 , .57 -22 . 38.17
,

)"( .


- - ) ,"( .
,0.82 37 " "? "
"? , =0 :0-5 ,
=1 =2 , = 3 , =4 ,
=5 , ) ,- (.
- Rusbult, Martz
(& Agnew (1998 ) ( . =.88
9
," : " .
=0 ,0-8 = 8 , ) , -
(.

" " .
, .
,
.


:
: 3.00
, 1.00 2.99
:3.01-5.00 .
:
, 30 .
0-8 8.00 0


t )
( , 1.1
t
11. " t

**p<0.01

(0.59)2.80
(0.48)2.67

(t(df
(29)1.82
**(29)3.80

, 2.73 - ) 3 - 3
( ,
t(29)=2.83,) .
.(p<0.01 t 3.00-" ,
) (t=3.80, p<0.01, m=2.67 ,
)t=1.82, p>0.05,
.(m=2.80

21. T
.

(0.59)2.80
(0.48)2.67

(t(df
*(29)2.32
*p<0.05

t
.t=2.32, p<0.05
.
,
) (1.2 .
,
.

.r = 0.27, p>0.1 , .
t ) (,
. 3
T- .
3 t , "

15
15

(0.47) 2.68
(0.57) 2.78

T test
0.51ns

10

 ,3
.t=0.51, p 0.1< . .

:
. .
." 120.
30 , . 50%
, )"( ,

.
,
- , ,

.
) Hoschild, 1989; Blair & Lichter, 1990 ; Fishbein, 1990; Gunter & Gunter
, .(1990,1991; Thompson, 1991
"" ,
.
t
, , ,
, )
,(1996
,
.
) (1.2

.
, (Hoschild (1989), Thompson (1991
,
.
,
-
, ,
11

 - , ,
, )Vanyperen, (1991
&Buunk
, ,
,
.
,
,
,
.
, ) ,(2001
,
, ) ,(2001
, , ,
, "" ,
, ""
,
, .

.
, . ,
,
, ,
,(1992) ,
,
.
) (1991 ,
,
.
,
, .
- ,
, , ,
.
12

 , .
,
, )
( , ,
,
, ,
" .
,
,
, ,
,
.
, ,

.

13


, (2003) ,. : ,
. - .
' " ,(2001) , , :' ' )( ,:
? , , ,
' .206
, , (1997) ,. ,
" , .
, . , . , , (1992) , . , .
- , , (1996) . , ,'
" ," .
(2003) . , .
) ,(2001 :
) (1919-1926 )1971-
,(1982 , .
, , (2001) ,. ,
.
," (1999) ,. " : -
)( ? , :
, (1991) ,. ,- ,".
, , (1992) . , :.

14

Adams, J.S., (1965). Inequity and social exchange, in: Berkowitz, L., Ed.
Academic Press: Advances in experimental social psychology, N.Y.
Adams, J.S. & Rosenbaum, W.B., (1962). The relationship of worker
productivity to cognitive dissonance about wage inequities. Journal of
Applied psychology,. 45, 161-164.:
Berado, D. H., Shehan, C.L., & Leslie, G. R., (1987). "A residue of tradition:
jobs, careers, and spouses time in housework", Journal of marriage and
the family, vol. 49, pp. 381-390
Blair, S.L., & Lichter, D.T., (1991). "Measuring the division of household labor
gender seperation of housework among American couples". Journal of
family issues. Vol. 12(1), pp. 91-113
Brehm, S.S., (1985) .Intimate Relationships McGraw-Hill Publication
Company. N.Y.
Denmark, F. L.., J.S. Ciali, S. D., (1985). "The relationship among sex roles
living arrangements, and the division of household responsibilities", sex
roles vol. 12 (5/6).
Doherty W. J., Soul searching: Why psychology must promote moral
responsibility. Basic books N.Y. 1995
Ehrensaft, D. (1987). Parenting Together: Men and Women Sharing the Care
of their Children. New York
Gold, J. M., (2006). Profiling marital satisfaction among Graduate Students:
an Analysis of the Perception of Masters and Doctoral-Student,
University of south Carolina, USA

15

Gunter, B.G., & Gunter N.C., (1991). "Inequities in household labor: sex-rol
orientation and the need for cleanliness and responsibility as predictors"
Journal social behavior and personality, vol. 6, no.3, pp. 559-572
Gunter, N.C., & Gunter B.G., (1990). "Domestic division of labor among
working couples dose androgony makes a difference?", Psychology of
women quaterly. Vol. 14, pp. 355-370
Haas, L. (1980). Role-sharing couples: A study of egalitarian marriages.
Family Relation, 29, 289-296
Haas, L. (1982). Determinants of Role-sharing behavior: A study of egalitarian
couples. Sex Roles, 8, 747-760.
Hoschild, A., (1989). The second shift: working parents and the revolution at
home. Viking: N.Y.
Karasu, Sylvia, S., (2007). The Institution of Marriage: Terminable or
Interminable? , American Journal of Psychology, vol.61 Issue 1, p1-16.
Kingsbury, N. M., & Scanzoni, J., (1989). "Process power and decision
outcomes among dual-career couples", J. comparative family studies.
Vol,20(1), pp 231-246
Krausz, S. L., (1986). "Sex roles within marriage". Social work, vol.31(6)
p457-464 nov.-dec.
Risman, B. J., Johnson-Sumerford, D., et al. (1998). Doing it fairly: A study of
post-gender marriages. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60 (1), 23.
Sered, S., (1994). "She perceives her work to be rewarding: "Jewish Women
In a cross-cultural perspective" in Lynn Davidman & Shelly Tenenbaum
Feminist Perspectives on Jewish studies, Yale University Press, USA

16

Steil, J. M., & Makowsky, D.G., (1989) "Equity, Equality and need: a study of
the patterns and outcomes associated with their use in intimate
relationship" Social justice research. Vol 3(9)
Thompson, L., & Walker, A. J., (1989) "Gender in families: women and
men in marriage, work and parenthood", J. of marriage and the family.
Vol 51, pp 845-871
Thompson, L., (1991). "Family work-women's sense of fairness". J. of family
issues. Vol.12, no.2, pp.181-196
Vanyperen, N.W.,&Buunk, B.P., (1991) "Sex-Role attitudes, social
comparison, and satisfaction with relationship", Social psychology quarterly.
Vol. 34(2), pp. 169-180

17

.1
.2
.3
.4
.5
.6

4
4
4
4
4
4

3
3
3
3
3
3

2
2
2
2
2
2

5
5
5
5
5
5

/
.7
.8
.9
.10
.11 /

5
5
5
5
4

.12 /
.13
.14

5
5
5

4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

.15 /

.16
.17
.18
.19 /"
.20
.21 /
.22
.23

5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5

4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

.24
.25
.26
.27
.28
.29

5
5
5
5
5
5

4
4
4
4
4
4

3
3
3
3
3
3

2
2
2
2
2
2

1
1
1
1
1
1

0
0
0
0
0
0

18

 .30 /

.31
.32 /
.33
.34
.35 /

5
5
5
5
5

4
4
4
4
4

3
3
3
3
3

2
2
2
2
2

1
1
1
1
1

0
0
0
0
0

) (
.36
.37

5
5

4
4

2
2

3
3

0
0

1
1

.38 )( .
1

.39
.

19

.40 , )( .
0

.41 / / .
1

.42 / .
1

.43/ .
1

.44 / / / .
0

20

 .45 )( / .
1

5
.

.46 " " ?

1

5
.

21