San Beda College Alabang

Alabang Hills Village Alabang, Muntinlupa City Integrated Basic Education (High School)
Minor Performance Task: Item Analysis Social Studies IV Economics
That In All Things, God May Be Glorified

Designed by: Kathy H. Ramolete, Jun V. de Lara, Epi F. Fabonan First Quarter 2013 2014

Minor Performance Task on the State of the Nation Address of President Noy-Noy Aquino/Special Issue Analysis on the SONA Pre-learning Activities A. Students are asked to get a copy of the SONA in Filipino or English translation, or; B. Students are assigned to watch a re-run of the SONA on television or over the internet on July 22, 2013. Paper Format: Note The paper is an individual performance task, to be done for three days from the day of the SONA. The date of submission will be announced by the respective Social Studies teacher. Topic Discussion/Guide Questions A. B. C. D. E. F. What are the key issues, policies and programs in the SONA? What are the justifications, validations or progresses and proof of economic development in P-Noys third year in office? How would you rate P-Noys policies and third year of administration? Is he doing well? Justify your answer. What is the best administrations best achievement for you? Why? What can you suggest to P-Noy that can help economic progress in our country? Upon reading/watching the SONA, what are your personal reactions, comments and emotions? Is there hope for the Philippines? Why? 1. 2. 3. Short bond paper Double-spaced, Times New Roman 12 Font, 1 margin on all sides Stapled and compiled by the class president in a folder for submission to the Social Studies teacher.

Rubrics for the Special Issue Analysis

Topic A B C D E F Excellent (5) All of the key issues are presented with a concise description. The student exhibit higher order thinking and logical analysis of statements, suggestions and recommendations with precision, clarity, coherence and validity. Very Good (4) Most of the key issues are presented with ample description. The student exhibit higher order thinking and logical analysis of statements, suggestions and recommendations with precision and coherence but needs further explanation or justification. Good (3) Half of the key issues are presented with little description. The student demonstrated higher order thinking and logical analysis of statements, suggestions and recommendations, but needs to be precise and coherent in the presentation of arguments. Adequate (2) Only some key issues are presented with little description. The student gave some analyses and suggestions, but lacking in explanations, coherence and clarity. Needs Improvement (1) Only some key issues are presented without description. There is little evidence of analysis done by the student and the suggestions were not logically valid or plausible. Poor (0) No key issues were identified. There is no presentation or discussion given by the student.