12 1391

33- 49

** 1

.
34 .
272 .
ANOVA t-student .



.

.

: ()WOM
.

89/02/01 : .90/06/08 :
* .
** ( .)
E-mail: ali.hosseinzadeh@gmail.com

34

- - 12 1391

.1

.
.
.

.

.


2006
200 ( .)2000



.

.2

.
.
( .)2011
.
() ( .)2002
1992

 ...

35

(
.)2009
. 2002 Roper ASW


.
.

. )1998(
41
.



.
. )1390(
( )
.

.
" "" " "
" .
( )1388





.

36

- - 12 1391

( )2011

.
)1386(

.
.

.
)2009( " :
" 1
2 .
-


.
)2008( "
: "
.

.
.
)2005(

.

.

.
1. Social dilemma theory
2. Reference group

 ...

37

)2002(
.
.

.
.
. .

( )2004 2004
.


()1977 ( )1986
( )1997 ( .)2004


. :




- .
2 1 :
:1
.
:2 .

38

- - 12 1391

. 1
( .)2008

( .)2002
" :
"
( .)2008 ( )2008
.

11
6 . .

.
( .)1998
. 3

:
:3 .
.


.

( .)2002 ( )2008

.
. )1998( 41
.

1. word-of-mouth

 ...

39

.
( .)2002
4
:
:4
.
.

. ( )2008
.
.
.
( )1998

.
5 :
:5 .
.3

.


- - .
272
.
.

44

- - 12 1391

. .

12
1NEP . NEP 1978

. ( )2006
NEP
( .)2009
5
.
( )2008 .
14 6 8
.
RSW
( .)2008 4
: ; 3; 2; 1 ; .0
3
.

.


.

SPSS 1 .

1. New Environmental Paradigm

 ...

41

.1

()WOM

4
4
4
4
4
4

0/837
0/693
0/748
0/712
0/724
0/753

NEP
RSW
RSW
Pickett-baker&Ozaki
Pickett-baker&Ozaki
Pickett-baker&Ozaki

.4

. 272 %50/4 %49/6 .

20 30 %39/7
. )%47/1( .
2 .

.2

49/6
50/4
2/9
14/3
47/1
27/9
4/8

20-30
30-40
40-50
50

39/7
35/7
10/7
8/1

. 3
.
.

( .)r=0/279, p<0/05
( .)r=0/020, p>0/05
( )r=0/185, p<0/05

42

- - 12 1391

( .)r=0/105, p<0/05
3 .

.3

.1
.2
.3
.4
.5
.6

1/8768
1/5512
1/6856
0/9849
1/8633
1/5392

S.D
0/29066
0/64695
0/59778
0/88750
0/64090
0/82912

2 1
0/279-

3
0/150
A
0/588
A

4
0/076
0/068
B
0/105
-

5
0/078
0/072
B
0/134
0/020
-

6
0/190A
A
0/323
A
0/366
B
0/185
B
0/327
-

A: p<= 0/01, B: p<= 0/05

( 0/279 )3 %95
. 1
.

0/150 .
- 2 - %95
.
3
3
0/020 Sig. 0/372
0/05 - . .
4
. 3
%95 .
0/185.

 ...

43

5 3
%95
. 0/105.

. t
4 .

.4

()Levene
Sig.

0/273
0/777
0/586

Sig.

0/097
0/625
0/918

%95


-0/266
-0/117
-0/074

0/022
0/194
0/066

4
%95 .

.

44

- - 12 1391

.5 ANOVA

Sig.

2/439

0/065

0/991

0/398

1/242

0/295

0/205
0/084
0/414
0/418
0/437
0/352

5 Sig.
%5
%95
.

.5

1
. .

. 2

.

. 1992


( . )2009
( .)2008
3 .1 :
.2

 ...

45

.3
.
3
. 3 . -


.
( .)2008

.-
(
) .
-
4 3 -




.

. 6

-
.


.

. 5

46

- - 12 1391

.
6 .
.6
Sig.
0/000
0/279
1
0/007
0/150
2
0/372
0/020
3
0/002
0/185
4
0/045
0/105
5

.
. . ( )2008
-
.

.
( )1388 .


.
( .)2008
.

.


.
.


.

 ...

47

3 2
.


.

4

.

.

.
.
- - -
-
.

.




.

1391 - 12 -

48

.)1390( . . . .1
140- 123 21 .
.)1388( . . . .2
.98-81 31 .) (
)34( 8 . .)1388( . .3
123-97
4. Arbuthnot J., (1977). The roles of attitudinal and personality variables in the
prediction of environmental behavior and knowledge. Environment and
Behavior, 9(2), 217-232
5. Bunnak, V., (2009). The influence of personal values on environmental
attitude, product aesthetics, and product evaluation. San Diego: Alliant
International University.
6. D'Souza, C., Taghian, M., (2005). Green Advertising Effects on Attitude and
Choice of advertising Themes, Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and
Logistics, 17(4), 51-66.
7. Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., (1978). The new environmental paradigm: A
proposed instrument and preliminary. The Journal of Environmental
Education, 9(1), 10-19.
8. Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., Jones, R. E., (2000).
Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale.
Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 425-442
9. Finisterra, A. M., Raposo, M. L. B., (2008). Determining the Charactristics to
Profile the "Green" Consumer: An Exploratory Approach. International
Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 5(2), 129-140
10. Gupta, S., Ogden, D. T., (2009). To buy or not to buy? A social dilemma
perspective on green buying. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 26(6), 378-393
11. Hoyer, W., MacInnis, D., (2004). Consumer Behavior. Boston, Houghton
Mifflin Company.
12. Kellgren, C. A., Wood, W., (1986). Access to attitude-relevant information in
memory as a determinant of attitude-behaviour consistency. Journal of
Experimental Social Psychology, 22(4), 328-338.
13. Kollmuss, A., Agyeman, J., (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act
environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?.
Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239-260.
14. Lee, K., (2008). Opportunities for green marketing: Young consumers.
Marketing Intelligence and planning, 26(6), 573-586
15. Mainieri, T., Barnett, E. G., Valdero, T. R., Unipan, J. B., & Oskamp, S.,
(1997). Green buying: The influence of environmental concern on consumer
behavior. Journal of Social Psychology, 137(2), 189-204.
16. Ottman, J. A., (1998). Green marketing: Opportunity for innovation. New
York: BookSurge Publishing.
17. Pickett-Baker, J., Ozaki, R., (2008). Pro-environmental products: Marketing
influence on consumer purchase decision. Journal of Consumer Marketing,
25(5), 281-293

49

...

18. Soderlund, M., (1998). Customer satisfaction and its consequences on

customer behavior revisited. International journal of service Industry
Management, 9(2), 169-188.
19. Sweeney, J. C., Soutar, G. N., Mozzarol, T., (2008). Factors influencing word
of mouth effectiveness: receiver perspectives. European Journal of Marketing,
42(3/4), 344-364.
20. Tanner, C., Kaiser, F. G., Wolfing Kast, S., (2004). Contextual conditions of
ecological consumerism, a Food-Purchasing survey. Environment and
Behavior, 36(1), 94-111.
21. Vazifehdust, H., Asadollahi, A., (2011). The Role of Social Responsibility in
Green Marketing & Its effects Health & Environment in Iran. Europian Journal
of Social Science, 19(4), 538-543.
22. Wangenheim, F. V., Bayon, T., (2002). The economic value of customer wordof-mouth referrals, conceptualization and empirical results. Journal of the
Academy of Marketing Science, 35(2), 233-249.