You are on page 1of 1

US VS. NAMAJA Facts: Namaja was arrested while he was detaching some wood panels from a store.

Issue: Whether or not he is guilty of attempted robbery. Ruling: In criminal law since the act of removing the panel primarily indicates the intention to enter and not to rob the accused can only be prosecuted for attempted trespass and not for attempted robbery. Trespass is the crime directly linked to his acct of removing the panels of the store.

You might also like