LUBBOCK ISD

SPRING .I99 1

TABLE 2: NUMBER OF DIFFERENT KINDS OF INHALANTS USED:

I L 2-,3. 4+
A] t 74.8% s.8% L8% 6 .6%
Gnade 6 *dl x% *%
Grade 7 15.A% 9,3% e.2% 6.5%
Gnade I 69 .6% 8.9% 11,7% s.9%
Grade I 75. 1% 10.1% 8.9% 5.8%
Gnade 1O 75.O% 10. 5% 7 .1% 6.7%
Gnade 1 1 78.6% 19-.2% 6.9% 4.3%
Grade 12 77 .6% ,1o.2% 7 .2% 5.O%

TABLE 3: EXPERIMENTAL USE OF ANY ILLiCIT DRUG(5):

None 1-2 T i,mes 3+ T imes
Al I 73.2% 9.7% 1? .2%
Grade tl *%
Grade 85.5% 6.7% 7.8%
Gnade I 76. 1% 8.9% 15.O%
q
Gnade 72 .2% 14 .3% 't7 .5%
Grade 10 65.3% 12. 1% 22.6%
Grade 11 65.1% 10 .2% 24.7%
Gnade 12 61.8% 12.5% 25.8%

TABLE 4: AVERAGE NUMBER OF TIMES ILLICIT SUBSTANCES WERE USED:

Past Month Lifetime

AlI . 1.3 4.2
. crade 6 t
Gnade 7 o.6 1.5
Grade I 1.1 2<
Gnade I ,tli 4.3
crade 10 -. t 6.2
Grade 1 1 <e 6.9
Grade 12 t.q 5.2

TABLE 5: IN THE PAST 30 DAYS. HAVE YOU SMOKED CIGARETTES?

No Yes
Al l 76.3% 23.7%
Gnade 6 *%
Gnade 7 83.7% 16.3%
Gnade Iq 76,O% 24.O%
Gnade 76.3% 23.1%
Gnade 10 70.o% 30. o%
Grade 77 .O% 23.O%
Gnade 1? 69.2% 30.8%

TABLF 6: ABOUT HOW MANY 0F YOUR CL05E FRIENDS USE...

6A. ALCOI{OL (BEER, WINE COOLERS, b/INE, HARD LiQUOR)?

Never
Heand of Uone A Few Some Most AI I
19.6% 22.5% 18.6% 23.3% 15.4%
Grade 6 * o/- *% *%
Grade 7 o.6% 36. 1% 28 .1% 15 .2% 11 .6% u^3%
Grade 8 1.1% 25.5y" 2C.6% 15 .9% 17.4% J3.3%
Grade 9 o.6% 15. O% 21 .9% 2{U-.3% 25.7% 16.5%
Gnade 1O 1 .O% L7% 16.6% 20.s% 33.2% 19.6%
Grade 1 1 9. s% 17,3% 21 .4% 31 .3% 2A.1%
Gnade 12 *% 18 .8% 21 .4% 31.1% 21 .7%
 LUBBOCK ISD
SPRING 1991

TABLE 81: PREVALENCE AND RECENCY OF USE OF SELECTED SUBSTANCES BY GRADE

ALL STUDENTS

Even Past School Not Past Never

Used Month Yean Year Used

Gnadel *% +%
Grade 7 45.4% 1A.O% 11 '7% 15 '7% 54 '6%
Grade I 53.8* 26.4% 14.4% 13'O% 46'2%
Gracle s s7 .4y" 24.9% 16 '2% 16 '4% 42 '6%
Gnade 10 62.1y" 33,9% 12'4% 1S'8% 37 's%
Gnade 11 55.9% 25'3% 15'5% 15'1% 44'1%
Grade 12 65.gy" 94 '7% I '6% 21 '9% ?4 '7%

Grade 6
*%
Gnade 7 67.3% 22.6% 22.8% 21 .9% 32.7%
GFade I 74.O% 33 .6% 22.8% 17 .6% 26.A%
Grade 9 78.5% 34.8% 26.9% 16.A% 21 .5%
Grade 10 81.3% 47 .2% 22.3Y" 11 .8% 18.7%
Grade 1 1 a6.2% 47 .7% 23.4% 15. 1% 13.8%
Grade 12 88.9% 56.3% 19.2% 13.4% 11.1%

*Yo
ade 6
Gnade 7 't2.1% 3.7% 4.2% 87 .9%
Gnade 8 1s.s% 6.6% 5.2% 8. O% 80.1%
Grade I 16.0% 2.6% 4.4% s.o% s4.o%
crade 'tO 15.5% 4.2% 4.8% 6.4% 84.5%
Grade 1 1 12.O% 2 ,a% 3.3% 6.6% 88.O%
Grade 12 12.3% o.e% 3 .9% 7.5% 87 .7%

Grade6 o/o *% *%
crade 7 15.3;/" 7 .g% 4 '2% 3 '8% 84 '7%
Grade e 24.4;/" 10. O% 7 .2% 7 '2% 75 '6%
,?'/" g 7 '1% 71 '3%
Grade s 28 11 '7% '3%
Gnade 10 36.1% 15'5% 8'8% 11'8% 63'9%
Gracle 1 1 35.5% 12,6% LO% 14 'O% 64 '5%
Grade 12 g8.4"/" 13 .6% 12 'A% 12 '8% 61 "6%

E *o/o *%
Gnade
Gnade 7 14.4;/" 6.9% 4.2% 3'3% 85'6%
Grade I 21 .8% g.o% 5 '6% 7 '2% 78 '2%
crade s iq.i;/, I '8% e 'a% 8 'a% 73 '3%
Grade 10 2s.7r" 12.o% 6.8% 1O'8% 7O'3%
Grade 11 ez.g;t" 1o.3% 8 '3% 14 '3% 67 ' 1%

Grade 12 36.97" ro'9% 12'8% 13'1% 63'1%

Gnade 6 % *% *%
Gnade 7 1o.1"/" 3.8% 3'2% 3'1% 89'9%
Grade I 13.4% 3.8% 3 '6% 6 ' 1% 86 '6%
Gracle g 13.4i/" g 'g% 5 .O% 3 'O% 86 ' 67"
Grade 10 16.0% 4.4% s'2% 8'5% 84'O%
Grade 1 1 17 .1% 2.6% 5 .6% e '9% 82 '9%
Gracle 12 21 ' 1% 3 . 9% 7 '5% I '7% 7A '9%

cnade 6 *% *%
Grade 7 2 -2% 1 1%
. 0.6% O '7% 97 '8%
Grade I 6.0% 2.O% 2 '2% 1 'B% 94 'O%
Gnade s 5 '8% 2.O% 2 -O% 1 '8% 94 '2%
Gnade 10 6.2% 2.2% 2 '4% 1 '6% 93 '7%
Gnade 1 1 8.g% 3 .O% 1 '7% 3 '7% 91 '7%
Grade 12 10.6% 3.1% 3'4% 4'2% 89'4%
 LUBBOCK ISD
SPRING 1991

GENDER

Frequengy PeFcent
a5

Mal e 1 559 52 .8
Fema I e J 395 47 .2
Total: 2954

q2. GRADE LEVEL

Freguency Per.cent
7th 77\ 26.O
8th 506 17. 'l
9th E{R
10th Earli t7.o
1 1th 304 10. 3
1 2th 36 1 12.2
Total : 2962
I

Q3. IIVE hIITH BOTH PARENTS

Frequency P6rcent
19
Yes I837 62,4
NO 1105 37.6
Total i 2943

Q4. AGE

Freguency Percent
8
1t o" yo|.rng"" I
o,o
l1
.t3
138 4.7
582 19.7
14
{B
570 r9.3
506 17,1
16 500 '16.9
<a
368 12 .5
18 229 7.8
19 or older 50 2.O
Total I 2954

05, ETHNICITY

Fnequency Pencent
59
Whl te 1550 53.4
Bl ack 340 11 ,7
Ivlexican/Amenican 941 32.4
0then 72 2.5
Total : ?903

NoTE: The freguenciea have been bretghted 6() th6t the analysis rcflects
the distrlbutton of studentB by grade level and eanpus in the district.