Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Cheating, Plagiarism, or Fabrication Suspected: Flowchart of Academic Dishonesty Process For Gliffy School of Diagramming

    Uploaded by

    Priya Segaran
    34 views1 page
    The flowchart outlines the process for handling suspected academic dishonesty such as cheating or plagiarism. The professor first decides if a violation occurred and whether action needs to be taken. If so, the professor forwards a report to community standards and determines a penalty such as failing the assignment or course, which requires approval from the department chair. The case is then closed if the student accepts the decision, or may involve a hearing before an academic review board if the student appeals.

    Original Description:

    m

    Original Title

    Doc2

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The flowchart outlines the process for handling suspected academic dishonesty such as cheating or plagiarism. The professor first decides if a violation occurred and whether action needs to be taken. If so, the professor forwards a report to community standards and determines a penalty such as failing the assignment or course, which requires approval from the department chair. The case is then closed if the student accepts the decision, or may involve a hearing before an academic review board if the student appeals.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    34 views1 page

    Cheating, Plagiarism, or Fabrication Suspected: Flowchart of Academic Dishonesty Process For Gliffy School of Diagramming

    Uploaded by

    Priya Segaran
    The flowchart outlines the process for handling suspected academic dishonesty such as cheating or plagiarism. The professor first decides if a violation occurred and whether action needs to be taken. If so, the professor forwards a report to community standards and determines a penalty such as failing the assignment or course, which requires approval from the department chair. The case is then closed if the student accepts the decision, or may involve a hearing before an academic review board if the student appeals.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    Cheating, plagiarism, or fabrication suspected

    Professor meets with student

    FLOWCHART OF ACADEMIC DISHONESTY


    Professor decides whether violation occured or requires action
    Professors No Action communicates in person or by letter that no action is being taken

    PROCESS FOR GLIFFY SCHOOL OF DIAGRAMMING

    YES. Action has to be taken

    Student specific Resolutions to the issues of AcademicDishonesty; 1. 2. 3. Professor forwards report of facts to community standards Failure of course Failure the assignment Redo assignment with the falling grade and a new grade being averaged together. Redo the assignment with no other.

    Community standards records are checked for prior academic

    Student has a Prior record

    4.

    Student has no prior record

    Professor obtains approval from Chairperson for the penalty

    Legend
    RED=Start and Finish process GRAY=Faculty Action or Decision

    Profesers sends student a decision letter copied to ccommunity standarts

    GREEN=Community standard Involvement

    ORANGE=Student Decision

    Students appeals decision Student decides whether to accept Hearing held before academic Integrity Board

    Students accept

    Case closed

    Students accept

    You might also like