Professional Documents
Culture Documents
OMLT
FOR
DUMmIES
by Pat Hurley
These materials are the copyright of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and any dissemination, distribution, or unauthorized use is strictly prohibited.
For general information on our other products and services, please contact our Business Development Department in the U.S. at 317-572-3205. For details on how to create a custom For Dummies book for your business or organization, contact info@ dummies.biz. For information about licensing the For Dummies brand for products or services, contact BrandedRights&Licenses@Wiley.com.
ISBN: 978-1-118-15344-4 (pbk); ISBN: 978-1-118-15588-2 (ebk) Manufactured in the United States of America 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
These materials are the copyright of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and any dissemination, distribution, or unauthorized use is strictly prohibited.
Contents at a Glance
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Chapter 1: The Evolution of Transport Networks . . . . . . 5 Chapter 2: Introducing the OMLT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Chapter 3: Digging Into Carrier Ethernet. . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 Chapter 4: Moving to the Optical Transport Network. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Chapter 5: Understanding the Role of WDM . . . . . . . . . 29 Chapter 6: Ten Reasons for Evolving to OMLT. . . . . . . . 39
These materials are the copyright of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and any dissemination, distribution, or unauthorized use is strictly prohibited.
Publishers Acknowledgments
Were proud of this book and of the people who worked on it. For details on how to create a custom For Dummies book for your business or organization, contact info@ dummies.biz. For details on licensing the For Dummies brand for products or services, contact BrandedRights&Licenses@Wiley.com. Some of the people who helped bring this book to market include the following: Acquisitions, Editorial, and Vertical Websites Project Editor: Carrie A. Burchfield Editorial Manager: Rev Mengle Business Development Representative: Sue Blessing Custom Publishing Project Specialist: Michael Sullivan Composition Services Sr. Project Coordinator: Kristie Rees Layout and Graphics: Timothy C. Detrick, Jennifer Mayberry Proofreader: Rebecca Denoncour
Publishing and Editorial for Technology Dummies Richard Swadley, Vice President and Executive Group Publisher Andy Cummings, Vice President and Publisher Mary Bednarek, Executive Director, Acquisitions Mary C. Corder, Editorial Director Publishing and Editorial for Consumer Dummies Kathleen Nebenhaus, Vice President and Executive Publisher Composition Services Debbie Stailey, Director of Composition Services Business Development Lisa Coleman, Director, New Market and Brand Development
These materials are the copyright of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and any dissemination, distribution, or unauthorized use is strictly prohibited.
Introduction
elecommunications service providers have a new option when it comes to how they build and expand their networks as they work to complete the transition to allpacket networks and meet today and tomorrows bandwidth demands. For the past few years Packet-Optical Transport Systems (P-OTS) have been the leading contender for this transition, providing an integrated solution to support packet transport over optical networks as well as preparing networks for advanced services supported by Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) and Carrier Ethernet. But P-OTS doesnt provide all the integration that carriers are looking for, because most solutions were built on previousgeneration architectures. Luckily a new network approach Optimized Multi-Layer Transport (OMLT) systems has become available. The OMLT brings a highly-integrated and modular approach to packet optical networking, incorporating multiple network technology layers into a single device and using a single network management system to control it all. The result is reduced capital and operating expenses and a network built to support yesterdays (legacy), todays, and tomorrows services.
Introduction
These materials are the copyright of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and any dissemination, distribution, or unauthorized use is strictly prohibited.
These materials are the copyright of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and any dissemination, distribution, or unauthorized use is strictly prohibited.
Chapter 1
ransport networks are the basis of all telecommunications services. These networks long ago moved from being primarily voice networks used for public switched telephone network (PSTN) voice calls from and to landlines only, toward incorporating mobile elements (like 3 and 4G mobile phone networks), data (including leased line services and Internet services) and even video services (watched any YouTube videos lately or even an on-demand movie? they were brought to your computer or mobile device via a transport network). The transport network is, to most users, unseen and relatively unheralded, but it truly is the engine that keeps the entire connected world running. Telecommunications providers are finding that their transport networks have to cope with increasing demands for more capacity, bandwidth, services and applications. So in this chapter, you take a look at some of the basic technologies and components that underlie transport networks, look at how these networks have evolved over the past few years, and examine a new approach the Optimized Multilayer Transport Platform (OMLT). I show how this approach provides true integration in supporting all the different network elements and can decrease a telecommunication carriers
These materials are the copyright of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and any dissemination, distribution, or unauthorized use is strictly prohibited.
These materials are the copyright of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and any dissemination, distribution, or unauthorized use is strictly prohibited.
SDH/Sonet
The most common TDM network in use in carrier networks used both in their metro area networks serving a city or metropolitan district and in their core networks carrying traffic among cities is Sonet/SDH (Synchronous Digital Hierarchy). Sonet and SDH are essentially the same thing a standard system for multiplexing (or combining multiple data signals) over an optical network. Sonet is the system used in the U.S. and Canada, while most of the rest of the world uses SDH. For the purposes of this book, you can think of Sonet and SDH as being the same thing.
These materials are the copyright of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and any dissemination, distribution, or unauthorized use is strictly prohibited.
Best of breed
In the best-of-breed approach, carriers find individual solutions for each individual part of their network. These solutions offer the best match of capacity, capability, and features. The end result of such an approach tends to be good performance, which is great, but performance comes at a fairly high cost in complexity and price. Carriers find they have more elements within the network to manage, and each of those elements have their own discrete management and configuration systems.
These materials are the copyright of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and any dissemination, distribution, or unauthorized use is strictly prohibited.
10
These materials are the copyright of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and any dissemination, distribution, or unauthorized use is strictly prohibited.
Chapter 2
arriers have been, for several years, evolving their networks in some very significant ways in order to meet growing demand from their customers and to further their move to all-packet networks. At the same time, due to competition and broader economic trends, most carriers are under increasing pressure to reduce their costs by both decreasing the amount they spend on capital expenditures and by reducing ongoing operations costs. A recent approach toward this kind of packet and optical upgrade to the network has been the P-OTS (packet optical transport systems) class of products, which combines elements of carrier Ethernet, DWDM, and optical transport into converged devices. Converging multiple functions into a single device as opposed to installing individual devices for each function makes for, simply put, a cheaper and less complicated network, without too much compromise in functionality. Unfortunately, many P-OTS solutions fell short of this ideal, lacking either in integration or in functionality. Specifically, P-OTS solutions typically dont offer the higher level network intelligence provided by a Carrier Ethernet Switch Router (CESR, discussed in Chapter 3). Clearly something more was needed in order for carriers to reach the next level of high-bandwidth, high-quality converged networks. And thats where the OMLT comes in.
These materials are the copyright of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and any dissemination, distribution, or unauthorized use is strictly prohibited.
12
These materials are the copyright of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and any dissemination, distribution, or unauthorized use is strictly prohibited.
13
An integrated management system that allows a carrier to leverage a single, familiar interface into network management, provisioning, troubleshooting, and maintenance
These materials are the copyright of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and any dissemination, distribution, or unauthorized use is strictly prohibited.
14
These materials are the copyright of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and any dissemination, distribution, or unauthorized use is strictly prohibited.
Chapter 3
arriers are faced with an interesting set of challenges when they look to grow their networks. First, theyre faced with ever-increasing bandwidth requirements because bandwidth is required to support both traditional services and emerging ones like mobile backhaul, video, and cloud computing services. Second, they need to maintain the ability to support their legacy TDM services until such services have been completely replaced by equivalent packet services. Third, they face an ever increasing mix of services, each with its own unique set of performance and reliability requirements. Thats a big enough set of challenges all on its own, but carriers must do all this while trying to minimize their capital expenses (Capex) and operating expenses (Opex). And they must do this in the face of a competitive market that drives down prices and requires them to differentiate their offerings in order to attract new customers.
These materials are the copyright of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and any dissemination, distribution, or unauthorized use is strictly prohibited.
16
These materials are the copyright of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and any dissemination, distribution, or unauthorized use is strictly prohibited.
17
Intranet-style Local Area Network (LAN) services, which connect multiple business locations as if they were all sharing a common physical LAN in a single location (called Transparent LAN services) Specialized services like mobile backhaul, connecting mobile towers to service provider core networks All these services are delivered by using common and standardized Ethernet interfaces at common Ethernet speeds like Gigabit Ethernet or 10 Gig Ethernet, so they connect natively to the customers internal LAN. The device that provides the control and traffic routing for a Carrier Ethernet network is the Carrier Ethernet Switch Router (CESR). A CESR is designed to provide the network intelligence (switch and routing) to ensure that Ethernet packets on the network are Delivered to the right place at the right time Kept secure on a shared medium (via use of VPNs) Provide appropriate levels of throughput, latency, and other performance parameters Meet a carriers service level agreements (SLAs) Carried over appropriate routes based on traffic patterns and the physical network on which the traffic is carried An important thing to remember about Carrier Ethernet Router Switches is that they do not handle the optical transport duties (which we discuss in Chapter 4 on Optical Transport Networks) of the network, like maximizing fiber capacity and utilization. Instead, separate devices are required for that part of the network meaning carriers will need to buy, install, configure, and maintain two adjacent sets of equipment to provide Carrier Ethernet services. Thats what makes OMLT solutions so compelling: Theyre the first carrier transport solution to truly integrate both the CESR and Optical Transport Network functionality into a single device, with a common management system.
These materials are the copyright of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and any dissemination, distribution, or unauthorized use is strictly prohibited.
18
What is MPLS?
Carrier Ethernet services can be supplied directly over a Sonet/SDH network, but most carriers use Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS). MPLS is a protocol designed to efficiently carry multiple types of traffic over a single unified network infrastructure while fulfilling each traffic types specific performance and delivery priority requirements. MPLS labels provide simplified and faster routing than traditional routers. MPLS has the following benefits: Flexible bandwidth allocation bandwidth can be allocated on the fly based on service requirements Security through IP tunnels across a network, without requiring encryption on the ends of the network Protocol independence MPLS can carry IP traffic, ATM, and so on all over the same infrastructure Fast routing through the use of the labels described in the protocols name MPLS labels contain information about each packet, so the router doesnt need to look inside each packet (as is done in traditional routing) to figure out what kind of packet it is and where it needs to be sent.
These materials are the copyright of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and any dissemination, distribution, or unauthorized use is strictly prohibited.
19
Table 3-1
Layer 1: Physical Layer 2: Data Link Layer 3: Network Layer 4: Transport Layer 5: Session Layer
6: Presentation Layer Translates the syntax or format of data between lower and higher layers 7: Application Layer Applications on a computer or smartphone actually use this layer to access services across a network
Each layer relies on the services of the layer below it and that provides services to the layer above it so if youre talking about a layer 7 service (like HTTP for websites), there are six layers beneath that service that provide the networking functionality required to make HTTP work. As you move up (numerically) in the model you move from the most basic make a signal go across a wire functionality to the most advanced (deliver this service from that server to this individual device). MPLS sits in a weird place when it comes to network protocols because its neither strictly a data link layer (Layer 2), like Ethernet or ATM or Frame Relay nor a network layer, like IP, protocol (Layer 3). A service provider can instead, as it desires, implement MPLS at either layer, on top of other protocols. For example, MPLS can be deployed on an Ethernet network (Layer 2) to provide IP services like Internet access (Layer 3). This ability is what provides the multiprotocol (MP)
These materials are the copyright of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and any dissemination, distribution, or unauthorized use is strictly prohibited.
20
Discovering IP/MPLS
A core or metro network that provides Internet Protocol (IP) services over MPLS is typically referred to as an IP/MPLS network. IP/MPLS is one of the primary technologies used by all major carriers within their network cores the backbone of their intercity/region networks. IP/MPLS is designed to provide the flexibility and service quality of MPLS (see the preceding section) over an IP network backbone. The IP backbone network provides an inexpensive and robust infrastructure for delivery of packets, but IP itself doesnt offer the kinds of service quality and assurance that a carrier needs to provide high-priority traffic (like real-time voice and video). Layering MPLS on top of an IP network allows the service provider to use MPLS and its labels to specify which packets get sent first to support traffic that requires more bandwidth or less latency. This prioritization ability makes it possible for the carrier to offer and charge more for services that require guaranteed service level agreements, while offering traditional IP best efforts service for non-prioritized routing and queuing.
Understanding MPLS-TP
MPLS-TP (the TP stands for transport profile) is designed to extend MPLS and its benefits beyond the core networks and into the metro aggregation and access parts of the network by providing a reliable packet-switching transport between these networks. MPLS-TP does this by simplifying some elements of MPLS in essence getting rid of the elements of MPLS that arent necessary for a transport-oriented network.
These materials are the copyright of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and any dissemination, distribution, or unauthorized use is strictly prohibited.
21
The three main differences between MPLS-TP and the broader MPLS standards are The removal of MPLS elements that arent related to connection-oriented data transport MPLS-TP relies less on dynamic routing of data and more on pre-defined and pre-provisioned routes. Additional Operations and Maintenance (OAM) tools for monitoring the network These tools operate in-band their signals can be transmitted within the MPLS-TP traffic without some sort of external signaling network. Support for a centralized Network Management System (NMS) control Centralized NMS is how carriers already manage their Sonet/SDH networks greatly reducing both the learning curve and the overall operating expenses for the network. While MPLS-TP can use a centralized NMS for manual configuration of traffic routes (called LSPs or Label Switched Paths), it can also be configured to use a control plane for dynamic routing, just like regular MPLS, if the carrier desires. Beyond that, MPLS-TP differs from IP/MPLS in the following ways: MPLS-TPs total cost of ownership (TCO) is lower because it reduces the routing and control complexity of IP/MPLS by relying on static, pre-programmed routes rather than dynamic ones. MPLS-TP focuses on transport functionality instead of routing, which eases the operation and maintenance, as well as services provisioning. Unlike IP-MPLS, MPLS-TP is a two-way (bidirectional) protocol. Traffic over an MPLS-TP network can be transmitted from point A to point B and back from point B to point A over the same path. This aspect of MPLS-TP resembles traditional TDM transport networking easing the migration from existing network technologies.
These materials are the copyright of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and any dissemination, distribution, or unauthorized use is strictly prohibited.
22
MPLS-TPs connection-oriented approach, along with its circuit protection mechanism, is another natural evolution from carriers existing TDM transport networks. MPLS-TPs deterministic and QoS-assured performance enable wide deployment in the most dynamic parts of the network. MPLS-TP provides most of the benefits of MPLS as used in carriers core networks, while at the same time offering a simplified and pared-down approach thats both well suited to metro networks and familiar to carrier staff.
These materials are the copyright of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and any dissemination, distribution, or unauthorized use is strictly prohibited.
Chapter 4
onet and SDH have long been the primary standards for transport networks over optical fiber networks (you can find out more on Sonet and SDH in Chapter 1). Sonet/SDH is a mature, well-known, reliable, and resilient TDM-based network technology. Its been the bread-and-butter of transport networks for many years. But Sonet/SDH has limits designed to max out at a speed of 40 Gbps. While thats a lot of bandwidth, its increasingly not enough for overloaded carrier networks. Its a capacity thats falling behind the optics themselves, which are starting to support speeds of 100 Gbps and beyond. So as you begin to plan your transport networks for an allpacket future, start looking at something new . . . and better. Thats where the Optical Transport Network (OTN) comes in. OTN is a new standard or series of standards, defined by the ITU, designed to provide a converged network infrastructure capable of handling both legacy TDM traffic and todays packet traffic with high reliability and speeds that far exceed the limits of existing Sonet/SDH networks.
These materials are the copyright of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and any dissemination, distribution, or unauthorized use is strictly prohibited.
24
These materials are the copyright of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and any dissemination, distribution, or unauthorized use is strictly prohibited.
25
Table 4-1
OTN Variant OTU-1 OTU-2 OTU-3 OTU-4
26
OTN is transparent, meaning that it supports all the management, operations and billing systems, tools, and automation used for existing services with no modification. This fact makes it easy for carriers to train their personnel to operate within an OTN environment. OTN supports any service inside the payload, even if that service crosses multiple carriers networks. OTN allows the mixing of synchronous services with different clock sources, as well as asynchronous services, on a common wavelength. OTN needs fewer wavelengths to carry a carriers traffic, simply because it can squeeze more services into each OTN wavelength. There is, alas, one big disadvantage to OTN: it requires new equipment. In most cases, implementing OTN is not an incremental upgrade (except where OTN-capable equipment has been installed but not yet turned on); instead, it is what is known in the industry as a forklift upgrade (which is to say, bring in a forklift and take the old equipment out for the junk heap). Given the compelling advantages of OTN and in particular the pressing need for the speed of OTN, many carriers are coming to the realization that the time for OTN is now.
These materials are the copyright of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and any dissemination, distribution, or unauthorized use is strictly prohibited.
27
Mapping services: The OTN maps multiple services (Sonet/SDH, Ethernet, IP, and so on) into OTU (Optical Transport Unit) frames to prepare them for transmission across the optical network. This mapping retains the original services operations and management overhead data, so performance and service assurance can be maintained end-to-end. Multiplexing: After services have been mapped into OTU frames, theyre multiplexed on DWDM wavelengths for transmission across the optical fibers. Management of optical paths and performance: OTN equipment determines the optimal paths for wavelengths, sends them the right way, and monitors the performance of the optical infrastructure.
These materials are the copyright of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and any dissemination, distribution, or unauthorized use is strictly prohibited.
28
These materials are the copyright of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and any dissemination, distribution, or unauthorized use is strictly prohibited.
Chapter 5
verywhere but at the edges of carrier networks (the last mile that connects a customers home or business to the network), fiber optic cables have replaced the old copper cables used in traditional telephone networks. In fact, many businesses and some residences now have fiber running all the way to the building meaning theyre on an all-optic network. Theres a very good reason that fiber has replaced copper. Well, there are a bunch of reasons, including that fiber costs less to produce, is physically smaller, is relatively immune to interference from adjacent fibers (called crosstalk a big issue for copper cabling), and can run farther distances than copper. But the one very good reason why copper has been replaced by fiber is that fiber is faster. A lot faster.
These materials are the copyright of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and any dissemination, distribution, or unauthorized use is strictly prohibited.
30
These materials are the copyright of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and any dissemination, distribution, or unauthorized use is strictly prohibited.
31
frequency range all at once; you tune into a specific frequency. WDM does the same thing with the range of light frequencies available on a fiber, and by tuning in to the right wavelength, the devices on the far end of the fiber listen to only the data they should, instead of all the data crossing the fiber at the same time. An optical fiber has limits regarding what wavelengths or frequencies will travel through the fiber with minimal noise and signal loss. But this limit is huge: An optical fiber can effectively carry signals over a range of about 40,000 GHz of frequencies. Thats 40 trillion Hertz a really wide range of frequencies. And a typical optical signal is only a few GHz of frequency wide. In other words, a signal only transmits in a range of a few GHz, while there are 40,000 GHz of frequencies that can be used in any single fiber. Given that equation, is it any wonder WDM came about? Put on your thinking caps and remember your educational physics course. Light can be measured in one of two interrelated ways:
By its frequency (typically a range instead of a single frequency) By the actual physical size of the wavelength
These materials are the copyright of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and any dissemination, distribution, or unauthorized use is strictly prohibited.
32
These materials are the copyright of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and any dissemination, distribution, or unauthorized use is strictly prohibited.
33
Future proofing: As DWDM systems improve, the gap between wavelengths on a fiber may be further reduced, meaning that more wavelengths can be transmitted across each fiber so future capacity increases may be able to be accomplished by replacing line cards instead of trenching in new fiber.
CWDM
One variant of WDM, lesser but still quite capable, is Coarse Wavelength Division Multiplexing (CWDM). CWDM systems use broader spacing between wavelengths on the fiber. This approach has a pro and a con: The Pro: CWDM can use cheaper optical and other components because it requires less precision in the optical domain. Cheaper components equal less expensive equipment. The Con: CWDM is less efficient than its successor DWDM (see the next section) because that wider spacing means fewer wavelengths can fit on a single fiber. CWDM specs typically max out at 18 wavelengths on a single fiber, but in practice, 8. CWDM systems are more frequently used in short range networks, while DWDM is used for longer.
These materials are the copyright of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and any dissemination, distribution, or unauthorized use is strictly prohibited.
34
DWDM
Another variant of WDM is Dense WDM, or DWDM. DWDM uses less spacing between wavelengths to allow more of them on a single fiber as many as 128 per fiber, but in practice, 88. DWDM provides greater bandwidth and spectral efficiency, but it costs more than CWDM (see the preceding section) to install. In addition to its greater capacity, DWDM offers the following advantages over CWDM: Greater range (over 100 kilometers) The ability to have the signal amplified instead of regenerated Regeneration requires an Optical-Electronic-Optical (O-E-O) conversion, which makes it more expensive and can cause performance issues compared to amplification, which requires no conversion out of the optical domain. A broader range of Operations, Administration and Management (OAM) signals, simplifying the process of operating and managing the network
These materials are the copyright of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and any dissemination, distribution, or unauthorized use is strictly prohibited.
35
that can pass some wavelengths through to the next node on the network while adding and dropping other wavelengths for local delivery to customers or other networks.
Theyre extremely reliable because they dont have any electronics to burn out or software to fail.
They dont require power, so theyre well suited for installation in outdoor cabinets and other places where power is at a premium. Theyre simple to configure essentially a set-it-up-andwalk-away proposition. The downside to passive multiplexers is that when a carrier wants to make a change in configuration, a technician needs to manually change or add cards or other components to do so.
These materials are the copyright of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and any dissemination, distribution, or unauthorized use is strictly prohibited.
36
These materials are the copyright of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and any dissemination, distribution, or unauthorized use is strictly prohibited.
37
Some vendors are offering solutions that essentially inverse multiplex, or combine several 10 Gbps wavelengths to create a faster 40 Gbps virtual connection. The preferred method is working on solutions that bring 40 or 100 Gbps over a single wavelength because this solution has better performance, power consumption, efficiency, and network management and compatibility. In order to reach these speeds, vendors have to create much more advanced optics (the receivers, transmitters, and related equipment that actually create the light that travels across the fiber) as well as advanced signal processing to compensate for errors and signal losses. An important factor to consider when reviewing a 40 or 100 Gbps option is the impact of these wavelengths on other wavelengths going across the fiber. Not all 100 Gbps solutions wont cause transmission issues with 10 or 40 Gbps wavelengths on the same fiber.
These materials are the copyright of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and any dissemination, distribution, or unauthorized use is strictly prohibited.
38
These materials are the copyright of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and any dissemination, distribution, or unauthorized use is strictly prohibited.
Chapter 6
n this chapter, in true For Dummies fashion, I give you a gem of a reference when you want to quickly remind yourself of why you need to evolve to OMLT for your business. This chapter lists the top ten reasons.
40
Reduced TCO
Many factors go into the total cost of ownership (TCO) of a network. By highly integrating functionality in a single device, the OMLT provides carriers a way to install and configure less equipment while still getting the same functionality as a best-in-breed approach with separate DWDM, OTN, and CESR equipment. Not only does this integration mean less devices to install, maintain, configure, and operate, but the OMLT also relies on a single, unified, and familiar management system a lot fewer consoles and UIs for network techs to learn and manage.
These materials are the copyright of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and any dissemination, distribution, or unauthorized use is strictly prohibited.
41
Simplified Management
Best-of-breed approaches, with separate equipment (often from different manufacturers) for each element of the overall optical/packet converged network require this expensive labor to learn and use multiple management systems just to get the job done, day after day. The OMLT benefits from An integrated, end-to-end management that uses a single interface for controlling both the network itself and also the services that are carried across it Sonet/SDH-like management exceedingly familiar to most telecom engineers and techs applied to the packet services world, simplifying day-to-day operations. With the OMLT, carriers can spend less time managing their network and more time innovating with new services.
These materials are the copyright of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and any dissemination, distribution, or unauthorized use is strictly prohibited.
42
Supported Services
How many times has your network streaming movie stopped to rebuffer while youre watching it? Blame that on the bandwidth issue that cant support the large files of movies. One way to avoid the dueling pitfalls of network demand forecasting is to build a flexible network. Flexibility means more than just being able to add bandwidth when needed but also being able to support whatever kind of service a customer requires, whenever required. OMLT can provide any kind of service just by selecting and installing the right line cards. So a chassis thats set up on day one to provide just wavelength services can begin providing carrier Ethernet services with a simple upgrade. Or legacy private line Sonet/SDH services can be supported and then upgraded to OTN, again just by adding or changing a line card.
These materials are the copyright of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and any dissemination, distribution, or unauthorized use is strictly prohibited.
43
another in the core. This adds cost and complexity not only in terms of buying and installing the equipment but also in terms of business processes and supplier relationships. The OMLT was designed from the ground up to be an end-toend solution with equipment designed for everything from the access network right through to the metro and core. All use a unified management system from a single vendor.
44
These materials are the copyright of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and any dissemination, distribution, or unauthorized use is strictly prohibited.