.

Q3

09/25/13

2 .

1 .

()

I1

A
I1

C
I2

I3

A
C
B

I2

A
B

2
09/25/13

 .
.

3
09/25/13

4
09/25/13

 -
?

5
09/25/13

 -?

6
09/25/13




dj dk

( dk - d j )

09/25/13

 ,
j k

8
09/25/13

9
09/25/13

10
09/25/13

sk - sj = zjk( j2 + k2 - 2rjk j k )1/2

sk, sj
j k.

j , k
j k.
rjk -
dj and dk.
zjk -

11

09/25/13


:

sk - sj = zjk( aj2 + ak2)1/2
aj2 = j2 c
ak2 = k2 - c

12
09/25/13


:


sk - sj = czjk

13
09/25/13

14
09/25/13

 : F, P Z
fjk , k
- j;
pjk ,
k - j;
zjk ,
pjk

15
09/25/13


. , , , , ,

. -

. C

16
09/25/13

17
09/25/13

:
?

18
09/25/13



.
. , ,
, , , ,
-, -, -
. ,
6- 6-
.
.
,



.

19
09/25/13

20
09/25/13

WEAK vs. STRONG

(Casewise MD deletion)

STRONG = -.0000 - .8715 * WEAK

Correlation: r = -.8715
1.6

BLUE

RED

1.2
0.8

STRONG

0.4

VIOLET

0.0

GREEN

-0.4
-0.8

ORANGE
YELLOW

-1.2
-1.6
-1.4

-0.8

-0.2

0.4
WEAK

1.0

1.6

21
09/25/13

2.2

Regression
95% confid.

UGLY vs. BEAUTIFUL

(Casewise MD deletion)

BEAUTIFUL = .00000 - .8886 * UGLY

Correlation: r = -.8886
1.6

BLUE

RED

1.2

BEAUTIFUL

0.8

GREEN

0.4
0.0

VIOLET

-0.4

YELLOW

-0.8

ORANGE

-1.2
-1.6
-2.0

-1.4

-0.8

-0.2
UGLY

0.4

1.0

22
09/25/13

1.6

Regression
95% confid.

ROUGH vs. TENDER

(Casewise MD deletion)

TENDER = .00002 + .11987 * ROUGH

Correlation: r = .11987
2.0

BLUE

1.6
1.2

GREEN

TENDER

0.8
0.4

VIOLET

0.0

RED

-0.4

YELLOW

-0.8

ORANGE

-1.2
-2.5

-2.0

-1.5

-1.0

-0.5
ROUGH

0.0

0.5

1.0

23
09/25/13

1.5

Regression
95% confid.

.. (1976).

. ,

1.6. .
. 31- 74

Torgerson W.S. (1958). Theory and Methods of

Scaling. NY, John Wiley & Sons

The Law of Comparative Judgment. The Law of

Categorical Judgment . 159-247

24
09/25/13