MARY ANN HENNEN
178 BAYVIEW AVENUE
NORTHPORT, NEW YORK 11768-1509
April 14, 2009
‘New York State
‘Commission on Judicial Condnct
61 Broadway
‘New York, New York 10006
Re: Suffok County Supreme Court Justice Sandra Sguui, Teuth Judicial District
Inthe Matter of Marv Ann Hennen, Index Number 07-16328
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Please consider Use attached letter my complaint with regard to Suffolk County Supreme
Justice Sandra Sgroi and how the machinations of representatives of the Suffolk County
Department of Social Services, law guardians, a court evaluator, a principal court clerk,
‘and others have influenced her and gained control of her courtroom.
Very truly yous,
hay Dan. Mentone
‘Mary Ann Hennen
AttachmentsCAROLYN & MALONEY
Te Disa wen
FINANCIAL SERVICES:
co A Congress of the United States iain
House of Representatives muon
‘Washington, DE 203
JOINT ECONOME: COMMITEE
April 21, 2009
Ms. Mary Ann Hennen
178 Bayview Avenue
Northport, NY 11768-1509
Dear Ms. Hennen:
‘Thank you for your recent comespondence. Your concerns are very important to me;
however, you reside in the 2nd Congressional District. While I would like to be of assistance,
Congressional courtesy dictates that I refer you to Congressman Steve Israel, who is your elected
representative in Congress.
Thave taken the liberty of forwarding your correspondence to Representative Steve Isracl,
and 1 am sure you will receive a reply very soon. If you wish to contact your Representative in
the interim, the address is: 150 Motor Parkway, Suite 108 Hauppauge, NY 11788, and ihe phone
‘umber is (631) 951-2210.
Member of Congress
CBM/ag
ce: Representative Steve Israel
Please Reply To:
1651 Third Avenue, Suite 311
‘New York, NY 10128-3679Matter of Demarco (Hensten)
Index No, 16328/07
Page 2
‘The Court is in receipt of a letter dated December 3, 2008 from the Specia! Guardian, Vincent G.
Berger, Ir, Esq., and a copy of a deed by which John T. Rieger, as surviving co-trustee, under the Nicholas
Psaroudis Revocable Living Trust dated January 26,2001, conveying real property to Mary Ann Hennen, Mr.
Berger notes that Debra V. Isler, Esq. had previously been directed to deliver the deed to Mr. Berger, but had
not indicated whether the deed should be recorded.
Mr. Berger indicates that he is secking the Court’s approval to record the deed, but that he has no funds
for the recording charges, which he estimates should be approximately $225.00.
‘The Court agrees with Mr. Berger's implicit suggestion that the deed should be recorded, Under the
unusual circumstances of this matter, Mr. Berger should first make an inquiry to the Suffolk County Clerk as
to whether the recording charges can be waived, If that is permissible, he should record the deed and so report
to the Court,
In the event that the recording charges cannot he waived in full, Mr. Rerger should move, on notice,
for an order permitting him to record the deed and imposing responsibility for the costs thereof upon Mary
Ann Hennen, This might include a request for permission w advance the funds and seek reimbursement upon
a future sale of the property.
Presently, itis
ORDERED that the request by Mr. Berger for permission to record the deed as set forth in his
December 3, 2008 letter is granted only to the extent, and upon the conditions, stated above.
oaea 24 (9104
L.SGROI, J.$.C.