You are on page 1of 1

MINIMAL-1 Demonstrates little understanding of the article with few or no key findings reported.

Key ideas/themes/findings are not communicated clearly and it is not understood if the article demonstrates a positive or negative impact on health. Student does not state the correlation between their article and their own personal health and does not reflect on their opinion towards this article. More than 4 grammar mistakes throughout the entire review and length requirement of paper is not met.

EFFECTIVE-2 Demonstrates some understanding of the article by listing some of the key points but documentation is lacking completeness Communicates the key ideas/themes/findings with little clarity or insight, not showing the understanding on the positive/negative affect their article deals with. Student reflects on their opinion towards this article but does not state how it would affect their own health.

EXEMPLARY-3 Demonstrates thorough understanding of the article by listing all key findings and reflecting upon their implications. Communicates the key ideas/themes/findings with a high degree of clarity and insight, showing they understand the positive/negative affect their article deals with. Student reflects on their opinion towards this article and states how their own personal health can be affected by this article. Proper grammar and spelling takes place throughout the entire review and length requirement is met (1-2 pages).

FINDINGS

IMPACT OF HEALTH

PERSONAL REFLECTION

GRAMMAR & REQUIREMENTS

2-4 grammar mistakes throughout the entire review but length requirement is met (1-2 pages).

You might also like