Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2 - VPF Hong Kong Rv1
2 - VPF Hong Kong Rv1
Todays Topics
Hyatt Singapore Hotel From Primary Secondary to Variable Primary Variable Primary advantages Chiller selection for Variable Primary
2003 American Standard Inc.
Primary Secondary
design
12. 0 C
650 tons 2
7.0C
12. 0 C
650 tons 3
7.0C
7.0C
7.0C
Primary Secondary
part load
11.1C
650 tons 2
7.0C
11.1C
650 tons 3
7.0C
11.1C 98 lps (each) 11.1C primary pumps 12.0C 12.0C 320 lps bypass (decoupler)
7.0C
7.0C
Variable Primary
design
12.0C
1 800 tons 2 12.0C 83 lps (each) 12.0C 700 tons 3 700 tons P
(typical)
7.0C
7.0C
7.0C
12.0C
2003 American Standard Inc.
Variable Primary
part load
12.0C
100 lps 2
7.0C
7.0C
7.0C
0 lps
Variable Primary
system flow < minimum chiller flow rate
11.1 C
7.0C
11.1C
2003 American Standard Inc.
12.0C 20 lps
4 lps
7.0C 20 lps
Comparative Summary
primarysecondary production pumps (primary) 1 per chiller variable primary None, so Occupies less space Requires fewer connections
Comparative Summary
primarysecondary production pumps (primary) 1 per chiller variable primary None, so Occupies less space Requires fewer connections
Selected for distribution pressure drop (piping,coil, valve) Controlled from system P sensor
Selected for system pressure drop (coil, piping, valve, plus chiller) Controlled from system P sensor
Comparative Summary
primarysecondary Bypass line No obstructions Sized for 120% largest chiller flow Open most often variable primary Control valve Sized for largest minimum chiller flow Closed most often
Comparative Summary
primarysecondary Bypass line No obstructions Sized for 120% largest chiller flow Open most often variable primary Control valve Sized for largest minimum chiller flow Closed most often
Load determinant
Temperature difference
Comparative Summary
primarysecondary Bypass line No obstructions Sized for 120% largest chiller flow Open most often variable primary Control valve Sized for largest minimum chiller flow Closed most often
Load determinant
Temperature difference
Flow-monitoring
Advantages
2003 American Standard Inc.
Advantages
Reduces capital investment Saves mechanical-room space Simplifies control Improves system reliability Improved chiller performance Saves energy
2003 American Standard Inc.
Less labor
Simplified Control
Unfetters chillers from flow-based control Operates distribution pumps to transport water not to start/stop chillers
Improved Reliability
Provides system with Fewer pumps and accessories Fewer chiller recovery options Fewer pump recovery options Better balance between pumps and chillers online
2003 American Standard Inc.
Part Load
% Load vs. kW/ton -- using ARI Relief Method
0.80 0.75 0.70 0.65 0.60 0.55 0.50
2003 American Standard Inc.
[ARI Relief]
kW/ton
0.45
10
20
30
40
70
80
90
100
Part Load
0.95 0.90 0.85 0.80 kW/ton 0.75
primary/secondary
0.70 0.65
variable primary
0.60 0.55
2003 American Standard Inc.
20
30
40
50
80
90
100
Greater Flexibility
chiller selection
Considerations
Evaporator flow limits
Rate-of-change tolerance Flow range-ability Difference between design flow rate and evaporators minimum flow limit
2003 American Standard Inc.
water velocity, m/s (fps) minimum 0.92(3.0) 0.46(1.5) maximum 3.4 3.6 (1112)
Rate-of-Change Tolerance
chiller (compressor) type centrifugal allowable flow-rate change* (% of design flow per minute) 10% for process cooling 30% for comfort cooling * Tolerances pertain specifically
to Trane chillers
Rate-of-Change Tolerance
New chiller control technology: Centrifugal Control feed forward flow compensation 50% per minute, all applications
2003 American Standard Inc.
= greater than 2
unsuited for
Variable Primary
Inadequate control capability Reciprocating chillers Return-water thermostats Insufficient chiller unloading Vintage chiller controls Poor financial return
2003 American Standard Inc.
xxxxx
Advantages
Reduces capital investment Saves mechanical-room space Simplifies control Improves system reliability Improved chiller performance Saves energy
2003 American Standard Inc.
More
Increase chilled water supply temperature difference to 7C (5C/12C) Increase range of cooling tower to 7C (30C/37C) Side stream heat recovery Stepless FCU
2003 American Standard Inc.
5.0C
5.0C
5.0C
12.0C
2003 American Standard Inc.
37.0C
37.0C
37.0C
cooling tower
cooling tower
cooling tower
Side stream
Heat recovery design
12.0C
5.0C
5.0C
5.0C
heat-recovery chiller
12.0C
Reference
VARIABLE
PRIMARY FLOW CHILLED WATER SYSTEMS: POTENTIAL BENEFITS AND APPLICATION ISSUES Final Report Volume 1, March 2004, ARI CR21
Variable Primary Flow Systems by Mick Schwedler, P.41-44, HPAC April 2000 Primary-Only vs. Primary-Secondary Variable Flow Systems by Steven T. Taylor, P.E. , vol. 44, no. 2, p. 25-29 ,ASHRAE Journal, February 2002
2003 American Standard Inc.