You are on page 1of 2

BA Hons Dance Performance 2010-11 Assessment feedback Collaborative PracticesDevised Performance- Film Project First Marker: Dionysios Tsaftaridis

Student: Konstantina Alexopoulou Comments (1 Marker) 1. Evidence of intelligent engagement with the learning experience provided demonstrating an original, inventive investigation which reflects a unique point of view: Excellent 2. Very Good Good Concern
st

Evidence of the ability to synthesise ideas and information, ordering existing knowledge and/or developing new knowledge Excellent Very Good Good Concern

3.

Demonstration of clarity in the structure and crafting of the presentation material, including movement: Excellent Very Good Good Concern

4.

Evidence of the ability to assess the status of and strategies behind processual work: Excellent Very Good Good Concern

5.

Evidence of knowledge of key issues in current practice and address them in your discussion/reflection. Excellent Very Good Good Concern

6.

Evidence of your role as artist/researcher at work, demonstrating rigorous attention to stages of experimentation in the process Evidence of excellent directorial skills in the theatrical handling of the dancers within the work Excellent Very Good Good Concern

Additional comments:

Overall, the images created were of good quality in terms of their plastic/graphic attributes. However, lack of experimentation with the visual elements resulted in simplistic scenes with non-innovative elements. There were also problems pinpointed with the choice of music and the way that was related with the image.

Suggested mark (first marker); Signed: Date:

49

2 Marker FOR MODERATION/ NOT FOR STUDENTS Name of 2 Marker: Dimitris Tsioukas Student: Konstantina Alexopoulou Please rate as EXCELLENT, VERY GOOD, GOOD, CONCERN next to each criteria 1. Evidence of intelligent engagement with the learning experience provided demonstrating an original, inventive investigation which reflects a unique point of view GOOD 2. Evidence of the ability to synthesise ideas and information, ordering existing knowledge and/or developing new knowledge CONCERN 3. Demonstration of clarity in the structure and crafting of the presentation material, including a clear thematic focus: GOOD 4. Evidence of the ability to assess the status of and strategies behind processual work how particular tasks and methods were evolved: CONCERN 5. Evidence of knowledge of key issues in current practice and address them in your discussion/reflection and thus demonstrate your understanding and application of variety of shots, scale, rhythm in the editing process, in order to create a work tha t can only exist in the film medium. CONCERN 6. Evidence of your role as artist/researcher at work, demonstrating rigorous attention to stages of experimentation in the process Evidence of excellent directorial skills in the theatrical handling of the dancers within the work CONCERN
nd

nd

Further comments: The music material used in Konstantinas film was incompatible and inconsistent with the visual element, leading to a total confusion and disorientation. This had a tremendous impact on her filmic work. I believe that a different music should have been used in order to enhance the feeling of stasis and inertia projected on film. Suggested Mark: 45 Signed: Date:

MODERATED RESULTS

First Marker: Suggested mark (second marker) Agreed Mark (if applicable)

________ _________ _________

____________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ____________________

(signature of first marker) (signature of second marker) (date finalised) (date finalised)

You might also like