Paul R. Kiesel, Esq. (SBN 119854)
Patrick DeBlase, Esq. (SBN 167138)
Elaine Mandel, Esq. (SBN 162950)
KIESEL BOUCHER LARSON LLP
8648 Wilshire Boulevard
Beverly Hills, California 90211
Telephone: 310/854.4444
Facsimile: 310/854.0812
Neville Johnson, Esq. (SBN 66329)
Douglas L. Johnson, Esq, (SBN 209216)
JOHNSON & JOHNSON LLP
439 North Canon Drive, Suite 200
Beverly Hills, California 90210.
Telephone: 310/975.1080
Facsimile: 310/975.1095
Attorneys for Plaintiffs NIKKI GREENBERG.
and all those similarly situated
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT
NIKKI GREENBERG, and all those similariyy CASE NUMBER: BC360152
situated,
FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION
Plaintiffs, COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
ve 1. INVASION OF PRIVACY;
2 NEGLIGENCE;
E-TRADE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, ) 3. VIOLATION OF COMMON LAW
and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, RIGHT OF PRIVACY; and
4 VIOLATION OF CALIFORNIA
Defendants. i BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS
CODE, SECTION 17200 ET SEQ.
Plaintiffs, NIKKI GREENBERG, an individual, for herself and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, hereby alleges as follows:
NATURE OF THE ACTION
1. Defendant E-Trade Financial Corporation provides consumers with a variety
of financial services, including banking, lending, investing and trading services. Without
informing consumers or obtaining their consent and permission to do so, defendant E-
Trade Financial Corporation engaged in a practice of monitoring, recording, and/or
eavesdropping on consumers’ telephone conversations with employees of defendant E-
Trade Financial Corporation,
4
FIRST CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGESSS eo emvoananeon a
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2. During the course of these conversations with employees of defendant E-
Trade Financial Corporation, consumers disclosed the most sensitive of personal
identifying and financial information.
3. Defendant E-Trade Financial Corporation's practice of monitoring, recording,
and/or eavesdropping on consumers’ telephone conversations with employees of
defendant E-Trade Financial Corporation violated plaintiffs’ common law right of privacy
and California Penal Code Section 630, et seq., and is an unfair business practice in
violation of California Business and Professions Code Section 17200, et seq.
4. Plaintiffs are members of a class whose telephone conversations with certain
employees of defendant E-Trade Financial Corporation were, without the knowledge or
consent of the plaintiffs, eavesdropped upon, bugged, wiretapped and/or recorded by
defendant.
5. Plaintiffs bring this class action seeking all appropriate damages and
remedies available to them.
6. _Alllallegations in this Complaint are based upon information and belief except
for those allegations which pertain to the plaintiffs named herein and their counsel
Plaintiffs’ information and belief are based upon inter alia, the investigation conducted to.
date by plaintiffs and their counsel. Each allegation in this Complaint either has evidentiary
support or is likely to upon further investigation and discovery.
THE PARTIES
7. Plaintiff Nikki Greenberg is an individual and a resident of the County of Los
Angeles, State of Califomia. Plaintiff Greenberg had telephonic communications with
certain employees, officers, and/or directors of defendant. Plaintiffs are informed and
believe and thereupon allege that each of these conversations was, without plaintiffs’
knowledge or consent, bugged, recorded, wire-tapped and/or eavesdropped upon by
defendants and each of them, ail to plaintiffs’ harm and damage.
8. Plaintiffs are informed, believe and thereupon allege that defendant E-Trade
Financial Corporation is a corporation organized under the laws of Delaware, legally
-2- sare secant sam
FIRST CLASS ACTION CONPLANNT FOR DAMAGESoperating and authorized to so legally operate and conduct business under the laws of the
State of California.
9. Plaintiffs are informed, believe and thereupon allege that defendant E-Trade
Financial Corporation has its principal place of business in Menlo Park, California.
10. Defendant E-Trade Financial Corporation provides a variety of financial
services, including banking, lending, investing and trading services, to consumers.
11. Plaintiffs are informed, believe and thereupon allege that the acts of
defendant E-Trade Financial Corporation, as herein alleged, were performed or occurred in
the County of Los Angeles, at 9454 Wilshire Boulevard, Beverly Hills, California 90212.
12. _ Plaintiffs are further informed, believe and thereupon allege that additional
calls have been bugged, recorded, wire-tapped and/or eavesdropped upon by defendants,
and each of them, without plaintiffs’ consent from various other locations within the State of
California, including, but not limited to, defendant E-Trade Financial's call center in Rancho
Cordova and financial service center locations in Menlo Park, Costa Mesa, Monterey Park,
San Francisco, Torrance, Palo Alto and La Jolla, all located within the State of California.
13. The true names and/or capacities, whether individual, corporate, associate or
otherwise of defendants Does 1 through 50, inclusive, and each of them, are unknown to
plaintiffs, who therefore sue said defendants by such fictitious names. Plaintiffs are
informed and believe, and upon such information and belief hereby allege, that each of the
defendants fictitiously named herein as DOE is legally responsible, negligently or in some
other actionable manner, for the events and happenings hereinafter referred to and
proximately caused the damages to plaintiffs as hereinafter alleged. Plaintiffs will seek
eave of Court to amend this complaint to insert the true names and/or capacities of such
fictitiously named defendants when the same have been ascertained.
14, Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and thereupon allege, that at all times
mentioned herein, defendants, and each of them, including DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,
and each of them, were the agents, servants, employees and/or joint venturers of their co
defendants, and were, as such, acting within the course, scope and authority of said
-3-
FIRST CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES