infowars magazine is published by Free Speech Systems, LLC. 12 times a year.

All content within this magazine is Copyright Free Speech Systems, LLC. Permission to reprint original infowars articles in whole or in part is gladly
granted, provided full credit is given. Some articles are copyrighted by our contributing writers, so check to see if copyright free status applies. The articles appearing within this publication reflect the opinions and attitudes
of their respective authors and not necessarily those of the publisher, advertisers or editorial team. Subscriptions and Bulk orders are available online at www.infowarsshop.com or through customer service at 1-888-253-3139. To
receive a free electronic version of the magazine become an infowars insider by signing up at www.infowars.com/newsletter. For general information, advertising or editorial inquiries contact 512-646-4414 or ADVERTISING@infowars.com.
Publisher
Editor In Chief
Graphics
Contributing Writers
Contributing Artist
Advertising
Alex Jones
Molly Maroney
Carter Watkins
Molly Rogers
Inkmouf
Justin Wheeler
Rob Reeger
Molly Maroney
Kurt Nimmo
Paul Joseph Watson
Alex Jones
Steve Watson
Adan Salazar
Ron Paul
Jon Rappoport
Aaron Dykes
Melissa Melton
Mike Adams
Donna Anderson
Janee Meadows
Mear One
Will Jones
Derek Einkauf
Matt Williams
Russell Dowden
PRISONPLANET.COM
Please tell Alex that the founders
rst created Associations. Those
were the meetings and not Tea Parties.
Please check George Masons history!!!
PLEASE! Then they wrote resolutions in the counties.
They then sent representatives to a convention to build
a new government (speaking of Virginia now because
they did it rst) There they dissolved the House of Bur-
gesss with George Masons Declaration of Rights which
lead the way to become Virginias Bill of Rights inside
of her constitution, 17 days later on June 29, 1776.
Jefferson had the rough copy from Mason via Richard
Henry Lees trip back to Philly. What we need to do
is create associations for liberty in each County, Town
and City. They then need to appoint representatives to
a determined state wide convention. This Convention
should be called a Bill of Rights Restoration Conven-
tion. The state can either abolish their parts of govern-
ment as Virginia has the power to or add that power
and certainly, anything for resetting their connections
to the Federal Government.
Vince Agnelli
Catlett, Virginia
Are you a zombie? Do the symbols and logos that de-
ne your very identity perhaps cause or trigger involun-
tary responses of hunger, fear, desire, and hatred? Will
you soon be attacking those pesky humans who dont
conform to your hive mentality, who dont eat your tasty
toxic food, who dont love the television programming?
If you are not, then take heart my friend, for you are
the light out of the darkness that has fallen upon us.
You can see it in the masses an almost indescribable
sense of despair and in the dull eyes. Epidemic levels
of obesity, depression, and stupidity are the new norm.
The human body, mind, and soul is under attack. There
is a very malignant force at work destroying our very
existence as a free and healthy people. We can all see
the symptoms, but nding the cause takes courage.
For thousands of generations our ancestors had to
ght, claw, and stay watchful in the night in order to
survive both natural and manmade dangers to life, lib-
erty, dignity, and sovereignty. And now we are told we
are a cancer a species of virus that must be contained.
Your history has been erased, your opinions have been
manufactured, your idols have been created and de-
stroyed, and your children are being turned against
you. No amount of prescriptions and sedations will
make this dystopian nightmare go away, but there is a
beautifully human solution.
WAKE UP!
You are not a zombie! You are not a virus. You are not
dened by the material items shoved upon you. You are
not dened by your digital status, or your wage-slavery,
or your neat little box you are made to live in.
You may have been poisoned since birth, and lied to
until you believed it was good for you but you can
wake up and rise out of your mental darkness! Stop
buying what they are selling. Question everything, in-
cluding history. Turn off the idiot box, use your brain
again, and live the enlightened and healthy life that so
many for so long struggled to pass on to you.
Paul Gray
Austin, Texas
EDITORS NOTE: Franchising opportunities will be
available soon. Inquire for more information about start-
ing a franchise in your community.
I have yet to get a subscription to the magazine. I see
you have given them away on the streets of Austin and
Im so damn jealous...I live in Pittsburgh...and this city
would never have something like that...well unless I do
it. One thing...I am an avid Alex listener...I love and re-
spect him...I just would like for once to have a show or
showcase [talk about] the GOOD things that are hap-
pening in the cause for freedom: Tenth Amendment
Center, WeAreChange, you folks and more...I think it
would be good to see that it is working.
Paul Sampsell
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
The statement Forever blessed is the good man,
which was used by Logan Patrik Madaras, is iconic of the
man who believes in the spirit of goodness amongst men
which redeems. In an all too familiar future, that ideal is
amongst Logans greatest visions for all of us. When we
say these things, it is important to remind ourselves not
to abandon the reections of our own selves in others,
for as Logan put it quite wisely, The future is in all of
our hands while the destiny of Earth is in God we trust.
So often we see pleas for help like those in section of
the magazine in our community. And so often, while we
know for sure there are corrupt things in our world, we
only know these things to ensure our own protection, and
as most of us now believe, protectionism is a gateway to
slavery. This will never be untrue so long as a man or
woman is a victim to something he or she cannot control.
I say this because recently, there was an Executive Order
by the President to allow security partnerships in the de-
fense of the homeland from the threat of Terrorism.
I hope all stay safe in the coming days, and that someone
reading this is rational enough to know that, as a Canadi-
an, it is impossible for me to be anything but complacent
in this manner as far as the U.S. security is concerned. I
only know that, because of that specic damage to the
American brain, my country will slowly become at risk
of the same damage, whereas we can all make a differ-
ence today.
Matthew
Canada
EDITORS NOTE: The magazine is available free online
via email when you sign up at www.infowars.com/news-
letter. Each viewer has alternative viewing options. How-
ever the easiest way to ensure you receive the magazine is
by subscription at www.infowarsshop.com.
I just wanted to say thank you for the free online is-
sues of the new Infowars magazine. Regrettably, I nd
it impossible to read online and it just results in frustra-
tion when I attempt reading it on line. I would love to
have the paper copy but the price is just too costly for
me. Is there any possible way that the online magazine
could be formatted as a newsletter or in PDA format? I
would love to be able to read the new magazine.
Catherine Stevens
Freeport, Illinois
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
WE would like to invite you to write
a caption for the what is obama
thinking? picture on the previous
page. we will pick the best caption
and publish it in the next issue. As
Always Please send questions and
comments to lettersinfowars.com.
Please be sure to include name,
location and contact information in
your response.
Nothing special will happen on this day other
than lots of people meditating globally, which is, in
a way, a special thing all by itself. But the universe
isnt coming to an end.
The day after the non-event, watch for the
mainstream media to blame doomsday websites
for claiming doomsday was going to occur. In truth,
most alternative websites are claiming nothing
much will happen on that day.
Watch for free speech to be increasingly called hate
speech when it criticizes the government or advocates
liberty. Watch for renewed efforts to censor internet sites
that advocate liberty and freedom. You may see Google
removing such sites from its search engine. YouTube
will get even more aggressive at banning videos that
teach liberty, and the mainstream media will continue
to pound propaganda into the minds of the mainstream
zombies, teaching them that people who believe in
liberty are somehow terrorists.
Pedophiles unite! Buoyed by the Obama surge, the
TSA will ramp up its hiring and begin building a literal
army of pedophiles, thieves and psychopaths which
will soon begin to appear across the USA running
roadside checkpoints.
I also predict that the vast majority of Americans are
now so brainwashed into a slave mentality that they will
gladly agree to TSA body cavity searches on the side of
In fact, the next four years will be a tumultuous
time for the free speech of those who criticize
government and Obama. At the same time, the
free speech of those who threaten conservatives
with violence will be completely tolerated, if
not encouraged. The rhetoric of violence is just a
preview of whats coming in the physical realm.
The NDAA, of course, gives Obama the right to
pursue precisely those actions: No judge, no jury and
not even a warrant required!
the road in the name of protecting us from terrorism.
This isnt mere conjecture. A new survey reveals
that roughly one third of Americans have already
surrendered their dignity to a slave-inducing police
state, and many would actually smile in the name of
security while they are being medically raped by the
TSA in the name of a completely fabricated war on
terror stolen straight out of the novel 1984.
Following the mass layoffs and slashing of employee
hours, the nation will begin to see yet more families and
individuals in a state of economic desperation.
This will inevitably lead to more crime as people
turn to theft to try to make ends meet. Watch for more
copper thefts as well as more emboldened hit-and-run
crime tactics (such as motorcycles being driven through
shopping malls, smashing jewelry store cases and
making off with the loot).
I predict you will see more vehicles smashing
through the front doors of retail stores, more home
burglaries and more muggings, especially in high-
population cities where Obamas economic policies
have the most devastating impact. Right now,
Detroit is already a war zone where police warn
visitors not to enter the city, and Chicago will soon
join the ranks of cities where gangs run rampant,
outnumbering police by a wide margin.
Last year, Obama signed the National Defense
Authorization Act (NDAA) executive order on
New Years Eve, cleverly burying news of the event
underneath New Years celebrations nationwide.
The NDAA gutted the Bill of Rights and turned
America into a bonade police state, with no due
process, no Fifth Amendment, and no Bill of Rights. It
authorized secret arrests, secret kill lists of American
citizens, and endless secret prison detainment without
ever being charged with a crime, among other things. It
signied the complete destruction of the Bill of Rights,
and Obama signed it in secret.
This year, hell use a similar holiday cover to sign some
other devastating executive order that, for example,
criminalizes criticism of the government (or something
else similarly ridiculous).
written by MIKE ADAMS
INFOWARS.COM 10
PRISONPLANET.COM
As Obamacare kicks in (2013 and 2014), employers will do three things to
avoid going bankrupt under the nancial oppression of socialized health care:
1. FIRE more workers to reduce overall business size.
2. REDUCE workers hours to below the government mandated threshold for
health care.
3. OFFSHORE more jobs to other countries.
The net effect of this will be, predictably, millions more Americans out of work
or working two or three low-paying jobs, none of which actually provide them the
health care they were promised by Obama.
This is not a sure thing, but chances are that Fukushimas
remaining structure will suffer a partial or total collapse within
the next year, causing an unprecedented release of radiation
that will reach U.S. shores.
This could happen at any moment, technically, thanks to
another earthquake or tsunami. Even a typhoon could cause
sufcient damage to topple a large fuel containment pool.
For some inexplicable reason, nuclear fuel pools are stored
above ground in the Fukushima facility, making them highly
susceptible to environmental damage.
Under Obama, food stamps and unemployment claims have already
experienced alarmingly worsening numbers. Watch for things to get even
worse as more Americans thrown out of work by the failed economic policies
of the Obama administration sign up for free food and paycheck entitlements
from the government.
This is part of the plan, of course: Gut the economy and make the population
entirely dependent on government. From there, its a slam-dunk to get elected
as a socialist or even a communist, and the U.S. economy begins to take on
the look of a nation like Venezuela or Argentina.
The U.S. government wont be allowed to go bankrupt just
yet. Although it has run out of money yet again under the
insane debt spending blowout of Obama, the debt ceiling will
be raised yet again, and the Fed will print new money to keep
buying up U.S. debt.
The long-term effect of this compounding debt spiral is,
of course, nancial suicide, but that doesnt seem to occur
to todays zombied voters who are really only concerned
with how many handouts they can get right NOW!
The droughts of 2012 will be felt via sticker shock at the
grocery stores beginning in the rst quarter of 2013. Watch
for not just price increases on most products made with wheat
and corn, but also shrinking food package volumes so that
manufacturers deliver less food in a similar-looking package.
Manufacturers will downsize their packages, in other
words, while keeping prices the same. This is another way
food ination hits home.
This is all the prelude to the coming Cultural Revolution in America,
where the political left will soon call for the mass culling of all
survivalists, independent farmers, and anyone who follows a lifestyle
of self-reliance. Individuality will be seen as a threat to the leftist
collective, and those who do now bow down to the power of the police
state will not only be arrested and terminated; the mainstream media
will CHEER the entire process through hate propaganda disguised as
protecting America from terrorism.
To help pull this off, a false flag event will almost certainly be staged
that depicts some hapless gun owner as a crazy person who poses a
threat to society. Watch for another Colorado-style mass shooting, or the
bombing of a government building followed by the immediate blaming
of a convenient patsy. All the usual suspects on talk radio will also
A REVOLUTION IS IN AMERICAS FUTURE
11
be blamed for it: Alex Jones, Rush Limbaugh,
Michael Savage and so on.
There is little question now that those who believe in
the real America are sooner or later going to have to
take a stand against the Obammunism agenda and
the endless hoards of useless eaters who now only
exist to feed off the government (while conscating
as much wealth from the producers as possible).
How and when this actually happens is anybodys
guess, but it will likely take many years to
completely unfold.
Ive always advocated non-violent revolutions via
the ballot box, but at this point its obvious that
those who suck the economy dry through never-
ending handouts are now the voting majority. They
now outnumber the innovators, the entrepreneurs
and the productive citizens of society. From here, its
only a downward spiral as citizens repeatedly vote
themselves more and more handouts until the entire
system collapses in both nancial and cultural ruin.
As Ron Paul recently said, America is far gone.
Were over the cliff, Ron Paul recently said on
Bloomberg Television. People do not want anything
cut. They want all the bailouts to come. They want
the Fed to keep printing the money. And they dont
believe that weve gone off the cliff or are close to
going off the cliff. They think we can patch it over,
that we can somehow come up with some magic
solution. But you cant have a budgetary solution
if you dont change what the role of government
should be. As long as you think we have to police
the world and run this welfare state, all we are
going to argue about is who will get the loot.
WHAT YOU CAN DO TO PROTECT
YOURSELF DURING THIS SLOW TRAIN
WRECK AND RISE OF TERRIBLE EVIL?
Preventing the total economic destruction of
America will now require a Ron Paul Revolution,
where tens of millions of Americans march
in the streets and demand an end to out-of-
control government and all its evils. Yet, the
U.S. government has designated the very act of
marching in the streets as an act of terrorism, so
these protests would almost immediately escalate
into a shooting war.
We are nowhere near the point where the
population at large is awake enough to engage in
such actions, by the way. Things are going to get
much worse before they get better.
The next four years are going to be like watching
an economic train wreck in super-slow motion,
augmented by bursts of police state activity,
censorship clamp-downs and of course increased
government conscation of everything you own:
Land, money and even formerly private companies.
Today, we are living in an occupied nation, where
the vast majority of those who claim to be running
the country are, in reality, enemies of the state. They
are dismantling, day by day, Americas economy,
Americas workforce, Americas industries and even
American pride. What will be left in four more
years will be nothing but a shadow of the great
America we once knew.
Mike Adams is a natural health award-winning
journalist and the editor of www.naturalnews.com.


We discovered nearly every whey protein powder is heated. Heat damages proteins, rendering them
useless, even harmful to your body. Dont waste another dollar on inferior whey protein. Learn exactly
what you should look for & avoid when searching for a superior whey protein powder. Discover which
one proves to be the purest & most powerful, consistently standing above the rest in quality & taste.

Look for Cold-Processed, Not Cold-Filtered
Once protein has been subjected to any amount of heat for any
period of time, it becomes denatured, or damaged. Denaturing
destroys the proteins effectiveness at supporting the immune
system and significantly weakens all body-building properties.

Dont be fooled by the term cold-filtered. Cold-filtering is
NOT the same as cold-processing. Some brands rapidly cool
down the liquid whey after pasteurization to diminish the
amount of damage or denaturing done to the proteins. They call
this step "cold-filtering. Cold-filtered protein powders have
still been significantly damaged. Until recently it was
impossible to find a whey protein powder that had not been
subjected to heat at some point during processing.

One World Whey Protein Powder is the first, 100%
UNHEATED, cold-temperature processed, completely all-
natural, unrefined, and grass-pasture raised milk-whey protein
powder. Regardless of the claims, no other protein powder
on the market is truly unheated from start to finish. One
World Whey is produced using the patented TruCool
process, which is the worlds first all-natural, cold-formulation
process for maximum nutrient retention. This unique
microbial-safe process produces the highest level of naturally
occurring, cell-regenerating, lean muscle-developing and
immune system-enhancing, bioactive whey protein.

This is not the same old heat-refined whey protein that
virtually all other protein powder manufacturers sell to
unsuspecting consumers. Unlike other ordinary protein
supplements taken to meet daily nutritional needs or build
muscle, One World Whey is a full-spectrum, all-natural,
nutritional POWER FOOD providing overall life-enhancing
benefits.

Pure, Natural, Raw Whey from Grass Pasture Milk
The superior whey in One World Whey is obtained from the
milk of cows on Amish farms, where they graze on chemical-
free grass. No pesticides or herbicides are ever used. The
cows are humanely treated. No hormones, steroids, or
antibiotics are ever administered. From this pure milk, raw
whey protein is obtained to create an unrivaled protein
supplement.

One World Whey provides an amazing 25 grams of
superior protein in every serving. It is produced using only
the purest, most natural ingredients. No artificial ingredients
are ever used. Unheated stevia is used as a natural sweetener to
create an unbelievable taste without a single gram of sugar.

High Cysteine Levels Boosts Master Antioxidant
One World Whey makes it possible for your body to
significantly increase its production of glutathione. This protein
powders superior whey contains high levels of the amino
acid cysteine. Cysteine is the rate limiting amino acid that is

needed to create glutathione. Cysteine combines with richly
available amino acids, glycine and glutamate inside the bodys
cells to produce glutathione. Glutathione is considered to be
the body's master antioxidant. It is essential to the immune
system and liver for the detoxification of heavy metals and
other toxins. Glutathione actually binds to heavy metals inside
cells and elsewhere and then carries them out of the body.

Amazing Health Benefits of One World Whey
Detoxifies Heavy Metals & Toxins
Boosts Master Antioxidant Levels
Anti-Aging Properties
Sharpens Brain Function
Reduces Body Fat
Increases Lean Muscle
Boosts Energy Levels
Enhances Athletic Abilities
Speeds Exercise Recovery
Supports Optimal Blood Sugar Levels
It Actually Made Me Feel Better.
Its By Far the Best I've Ever Tried!
During the past 30 years, I've tried a half-dozen or so whey
protein products. One World Whey is the first one in which I
noticed a discernible difference. It not only tastes better than
any other vanilla whey I've used, but it actually made me feel
better. This difference became even more dramatic when I ran
out and had to substitute another popular whey protein
product. Most people know how beneficial whey protein
powder is. More people need to know is how much more
beneficial One World Whey is. Its by far the best I've ever
tried. I will never let myself run out of it again. -Rich Maender

You Wont Find One World Whey Just Anywhere
One World Whey Protein Powder is available through
Synergistic Nutrition in one and five pound containers. Choose
from three delicious, all-natural flavors: vanilla, strawberry, or
chocolate. Even children love the taste! Call 1(864)895-6250
or go to www.sgn80.com to receive a Limited-Time Offer
Discount on One World Whey Protein Powder.
INFOWARS.COM

G
un control advocate Sarah Bradys infa-
mous vow to get rid of all the guns
has never been more prescient, as we
enter a second term of the Obama
administration 18 months after
Obama assured Brady during a White
House meeting that gun control was
very much on his agenda.
Gun sales surged before the election, and panic
buying continues to proliferate, with stocks of gun
manufacturers like Ruger and Smith & Wesson going
parabolic, as Americans prepare for an all out assault
on the Second Amendment.
Obama himself publicly signaled his intention to
reintroduce the assault weapons ban during the
second presidential debate.
What Im trying to do is to get a broader conver-
sation about how do we reduce the violence general-
ly, Obama said during the debate at Hofstra Univer-
sity. Part of it is seeing if we can get an assault
weapons ban reintroduced.
Obamas anti-gun record clearly suggests he will
use his lame duck term as a tool with which to evis-
cerate the Second Amendment.
As an Illinois state senator, Obama attempted to limit
sales of handguns to one per month and even voted
against a bill that protected rearms manufacturers
from lawsuits over misuse of their products by others.
Obama has consistently supported the assault weapons
ban and even ridiculed gun owners during an April 2008
speech when he said small town people cling to guns
to express their frustration.
Obamas March 2011 meeting with Brady, during
which he assured her that he was working under the
radar to assault gun rights just months before the Fast
and Furious scandal broke clearly indicates that Ameri-
cans may cling to guns for a very salient reason the
SECOND AMENDMENT IN THE CROSSHAIRS
fear that an Obama administration with nothing to lose
is set to take a huge bite out of the Second Amendment.
Gun rights are already being whittled away through
regulatory procedures that operate outside of the law,
with the ATF last year issuing a letter ordering rearms
dealers in border states to report sales of two or more
semi-automatic ries, and following it up by harassing
gun owners with intimidating home visits as well as
threatening gun dealers to spy on their customers.
The ATFs regulatory backdoor assault on gun rights
is also opening the door for shotguns to be banned
under the justication that they can hold more than
two rounds, a move Dudley Brown, executive director
of Rocky Mountain Gun Owners, said will be the most
dangerous interpretation of the 1968 Gun Control Act
ever envisioned and will outlaw thousands of perfectly
legitimate home defense shotguns.
Americans who buy a few boxes of ammunition are
also being treated as suspicious individuals and ques-
tioned by police.
Senator Dianne Feinstein D-CA has already
resolved to push a new piece of anti-gun legisla-
tion that would, Ban pistol grips and high-capacity
magazines, eliminate any grandfathering and ban
sales of weapons in possession.
The fact that Barack Obama has occasionally prom-
ised not to target the Second Amendment is completely
meaningless. Indeed, if you look at all the other liberties
his administration has savaged, the assurance that he
wont dismantle gun rights should almost be taken as a
threat that he will.
As part of his 2008 campaign pledge, Obama
promised to close down Guantanamo Bay. The Obama
administration not only failed to close the infamous
prison camp, they expanded its use.
Last year (after campaigning to protect Habeas
Corpus before he was elected), Obama promised not
WHAT WE NEED TO DO IS CHANGE THE WAY IN WHICH
PEOPLE THINK ABOUT GUNS, ESPECIALLY YOUNG
PEOPLE.WE HAVE TO BE REPETITIVE ABOUT THIS.
WE NEED TO DO THIS EVERY DAY OF THE WEEK, AND JUST
REALLY BRAINWASH PEOPLE INTO THINKING ABOUT
GUNS IN A VASTLY DIFFERENT WAY.
THE MOST FOOLISH
MISTAKE WE COULD
POSSIBLY MAKE WOULD
BE TO ALLOW THE
SUBJECTED PEOPLE TO
CARRY ARMS. HISTORY
SHOWS THAT ALL
CONQUERORS WHO
HAVE ALLOWED THEIR
SUBJECTED PEOPLES
TO CARRY ARMS HAVE
PREPARED THEIR OWN
DOWNFALL BY SO
DOING.
attorney general ERIC HOLDER
edict of march 18, 1938
ADOLPH HITLER
14
PRISONPLANET.COM

to sign the National Defense Authorization Act, with

its provisions for the indenite detention of American
citizens, yet put his signature on the bill in the dead
of night on New Years Eve. Indeed, it was the Obama
administration itself that argued for the removal of
language that would have protected Americans from the
provisions and then had them reinstituted after a court
had struck them down.
AS PART OF HIS CAMPAIGN
PITCH, OBAMA PROMISED
TO NOT USE SIGNING
STATEMENTS AS A WAY OF
DOING AN END RUN AROUND
CONGRESS. OBAMA HAS
ISSUED NO LESS THAN 19
SIGNING STATEMENTS SINCE
HE TOOK OFFICE.
In 2008, Obama promised no more illegal wiretap-
ping of American citizens. Just months after he took
ofce, Obama expanded Bushs warrantless wiretap-
ping program. The invasiveness of illegal wiretapping is
worse under Obama than it was under Bush.
THE HISTORY OF GUN
CONTROL IS THE
HISTORY OF TYRANNY
The history of gun control tells us that state seizure
of rearms is habitually used as a precursor to impose a
power monopoly of the state.
Right back to Roman times, the lower orders were
disarmed of all their weapons in a bid to suffocate
the political power of the people and limit their
ability to voice grievances.
Japanese warrior Toyotomi Hideyoshi was candid
in explaining why the population of that country
was disarmed in what came to be known as the
Great Sword Hunt in 1588 when he decreed: The
possession of unnecessary implements [of war]
makes difficult the collection of taxes and dues,
and tends to foment uprisings.
Communist mastermind Chairman Mao echoed a
similar sentiment when he stated, Political power
grows out of the barrel of a gun.
Fast forward 250 years, and some of the rst gun
control laws in the embryonic United States were
against black people, to ensure they remained slaves.
Blacks were prohibited to keep or carry any relock of
any kind, any military weapon, or any powder or lead.
Adolf Hitler was also abundantly aware of the fact
that the one thing standing in the way of a repres-
sive dictatorship is an armed population. In 1938 the
Nazis banned Jews from acquiring, possessing, and
carrying rearms and ammunition, as well as trun-
cheons or stabbing weapons.
In the 21st century, the primary vanguard of gun
control has been elevated to the international level.
Hours after Obamas re-election victory, his adminis-
tration joined with 150 other governments to renew
support for the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty, a
process that critics have warned will set the stage for
Americans to have their gun rights voted out of exis-
tence by the global body with no involvement from the
U.S. Congress or Senate.
Whether Obama chooses to characterize his second
term by declaring war on the Second Amendment
remains to be seen, but its almost inevitable given that
virtually every one of Obamas promises before his 2008
election success has been broken, we will once again
witness the lurching advance of big government over
the next four years as cherished rights are chewed up
and spat out with wanton disregard for the Constitu-
tional foundation of the country.
WE MUST GET
RID OF ALL THE
GUNS.
attorney general ERIC HOLDER
sarah BRADY
15
20
WHY OBAMA WILL REVIVE THE PUSH FOR
CO2 TAXES, AND THE GREEN AGENDA
IS ABOUT CONTROL AND PROFITS, NOT
SAVING THE ENVIRONMENT
B
arack Obamas campaign for the presidency
leading up to the 2008 vote centered, in part,
around his image as an environmentalist
who would bring green energy solutions to
America. The 2012 campaign, on the other hand, was
far more reserved in advertising these policies.
Fierce battles in Congress over cap and trade, the
science of global warming and those who stand to prot
from carbon tax schemes drove the agenda underground
midway through Obamas rst term, but that doesnt
mean it has gone away.
Obama now stands poised to rule by regulations, to
tax and control by a thousand cuts.
Indeed, the day after Obama was re-elected, mega-
banks announced that the administration was
considering reintroducing a carbon tax, promising the
environmental scheme could provide revenue that could
help pay down the U.S. decit. Never mind that the tax
is really about control, and the money would be mostly
funneled through banks proting off the scheme.
But thats only the frontal assault, a push for legislation
that may or may not be achievable with a divided
Congress.
Instead, Barack Obama is continuing a tradition that
began with FDR, who demanded broad executive
power, and progressed into the dictatorial actions taken
by George W. Bush, who as president used executive
orders and the stroke of the pen to implement policy
and rule by at.
Back in 2008, presidential candidate and Senator
written by AARON DYKES
Barack Obama promised to bring the industry to its
knees through emissions regulations. If somebody
wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can, its
just that it will bankrupt them, Obama told the San
Francisco Chronicle. Under my plan of a cap and trade
system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket,
he also stated.
Obama and his appointee Lisa Jackson have used
the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to do just
that, rst ofcially declaring CO2 to be a dangerous
pollutant, then using red tape to crack down on energy
production, namely coal.
Days before the election, the Washington Examiner
revealed that the EPA had more than 50 staffers working
to nalize strict new regulations on greenhouse gases it
would implement during the lame duck session in the
event that Obama was not re-elected. Those new rules
would effectively prevent new coal power plants from
being built. Estimates show these new regulations alone
would cost the U.S. economy some $700 billion.
But Larry Bell, writing for Forbes.com, exposed the
fact that this was just the beginning. The full agenda
under Obamas second term, just in energy regulations
alone, involves countless new proposals through the
EPA, under the Clean Air Act (CAA), the Clean Water
Act (CWA) and other provisions, to regulate greenhouse
gas regulations, ozone standards, bodies of water big
and small across the United States, hydraulic fracking,
storm-water run-off requirements, the sulphur content
in gasoline, cement used for construction, cooling
towers, coal ash, spill prevention rules, farm dust
regulations and much more.
While some of these issues are legitimate concerns,
the overall scope of the regulatory assault amounts to
one net effect: higher costs for energy, for construction
materials and for the cost of achieving bureaucratic
approval and paperwork, which will in turn hamper
businesses and slow the economy even more. Obamas
mean, green agenda will kill anywhere from half a
million to 1.4 million jobs just by 2014, according to
estimates conducted by the American Council for Capital
Formation. Senator James Inhofe (R-OK), a staunch
critic of the entire carbon agenda, published a report in
the U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public
Works Minority Committee titled, A Look Ahead to
EPA Regulations for 2013: Numerous Obama EPA Rules
Place on Hold Until After the Election Spell Doom for
Jobs and Economic Growth. All this, and the EPA is
just one agency at Obamas disposal. CNS News found
that the Obama administration is rapidly deploying
regulations, averaging 68 new requirements per day,
with at least 6,125 new proposals for taxation and red
tape underway. Through endless regulations, President
Obama intends to circumvent the stopgap measure of
Congress and rule as Bush did, by executive decree,
using agencies, as FDR did, to impose policy across the
land. But why would Obama pursue such devastating
policies just when America is trying to recover from the
greatest economic down turn of our time, which he has
presided over under sustained criticism?
Because the bankers are running the show, and
Obama, like Mitt Romney, is beholden to those banking
interests. In the most basic economics, supply and
demand are interrelated. Greater supply weakens
demand, creating abundance and cheap goods. On the
other hand, a weaker supply creates greater demand
and creates more expensive goods.
The burden of regulations, when applied to energy
costs, for instance, creates not only a more expensive
product, but an articial scarcity on supply. Under
green (for money, not the environment) policies,
Americans will pay more for less electricity. Likewise,
under carbon taxes, where companies and individuals
trade for the right to pollute and bid up the price, an
articial supply on carbon credits is also created, driving
up the price on something that didnt even have a cost
prior to the regulation. And who does this benet, but
the money changers? The bankers, the carbon traders
and the promoters of those systems stand to make
fortunes. Former Vice President Al Gore, among others,
was slated to become a carbon billionaire under cap-
and-trade schemes he had devised with a partner and
executive from Goldman Sachs. The concept of pricing
carbon itself evolved out of President Clintons Council
on Sustainable Development, formed in 1993, where Al
Gore sat with the heads of numerous energy companies,
including Enrons CEO Ken Lay, to nalize a protable
approach to environmentalism.
Years later, Enron became notorious with scandal and
fraud, but not before it made a killing in the deregulated
energy market of California. The documentary Enron:
Smartest Guys in the Room clearly demonstrates with
real audio recordings how traders from Enron and other
rms colluded with energy insiders to articially shut
down power plants, creating energy shortages and
blackouts, so that they could drive up the price and rake
in the prots. It emerged in November 2012 that Barclays
was doing something quite similar, facing some $470
million in nes for rigging the U.S. electricity market.
Its employees had been caught bragging about their
manipulations in email, setting an investigation under
way. Obamas latest round of carbon taxes was proposed
by HSBC Holdings Plc. who are currently facing record
nes of $1.5 billion for admitted money laundering
ESTIMATES SHOW THESE
NEW REGULATIONS ALONE
WOULD COST THE UNITED
STATES ECONOMY SOME
$700 BILLION.
activity - aiding Mexican drug cartels, terrorists group
and rogue nations with their nances.
The very mega-banks Americans bailed out in 2008
under duress include many of the same rms that stand
to make huge prots under carbon taxes and the trade
of their derivatives on the market, as well as other
lucrative (and controlling) regulations that may be
imposed on the U.S. economy. Yet the crisis itself was
created in large part by the horror of these banks betting
on the global derivatives market with the savings,
pensions and investments of ordinary, hard-working
Americans.
These examples of the crony capitalist market are
creating, and feeding, the larger problem that President
Obamas new regulations will only exacerbate. The
crony market is the very opposite of anything even
resembling a free market. Worse than just inefcient, it
breeds corruption. Solyndra is iconic of that picking
winners and losers, and subsidizing insiders with no
meaningful return to the taxpayers who funded it.
But it is far worse than just Solyndra. The scope of
involvement of the globalist offshore entities that control
the big banks means that the system is gamed from
the beginning. Regulations amount to a virtual racket
when you factor in the insider trading of information
about the atmosphere of the market. Friends of the
administration and of the banks get waivers, know the
timing and otherwise have telling advice about how
to place their bets. Meanwhile, honest businesses are
saddled with loads of paperwork, new taxes and the
constant threat of regulatory intervention. For already
dominant nancial institutions, eliminating competition
is an easy task.
The public is sold on the merit of backing green
environmental initiatives, thinking theyve joined a
benecial program to help save the earth, conserve
resources and stick it to the polluters. But the truth is
they have been deceived. Whether it is the Rockefeller
Brothers Fund and their original Standard Oil interests,
Dutch Royal Shell, Goldman Sachs, General Electric, or
many other big players, it is too often the big polluters
who are actually driving the regulatory regime,
partnered with big banks to prot from the control of
our human activities.
Whatever the concerns we may have about our
environment, we are unintentionally enabling our
economic domination and the demise of the global
economy through dangerous regulations like the ones
Obama is now beginning to implement as his second
term unfolds.
Aaron Dykes is a researcher, reporter, producer and
writer for the Nightly News and www.infowars.com. He
graduated from the University of Texas and has been
working with Alex Jones since 2006.
21
N O W D E P A R T I N G
DANGER! TRAVEL ADVISORY!
BEWARE OF TSA CRIMEZONES
Y O U R
L U G G A G E
29
27
24
17
15
14
14
11
6
12
6
6
5
10
10
12
7
7
9
# OF FIRED TSA EMPLOYEES
253 Total
T OP 2 0 MA J OR A I RPORT S
PRISONPLANET.COM 23
A M E R I
C A N S
S U R R E N D E R
D I G N I
T Y
O R F S E C U R
I T Y
P O L I C E S T A T E N O W A R I V I N G R
T
he new survey commissioned by Infowars
and conducted by Harris Interactive has also
found that almost one third of American
adults would accept a TSA body cavity
search in order to y, with a majority of Americans
also feeling a law that would make disobeying a TSA
agent in any public place illegal is reasonable.
The shocking results emphasize the level of indignity
Americans are willing to tolerate in order to travel. They
also highlight how the TSAs reputation has remained
largely intact despite a series of scandals and widespread
criticism from innumerable public gures.
However, on other fronts the poll provides good news
for those concerned with how liberties are being lost
in the name of stopping terrorism. For example, a clear
majority (65 percent) of American adults feel that TSA
pat down policies that in some cases involve TSA agents
touching travelers genitals are unacceptable.
The survey was conducted online by Harris Interactive
on behalf of Infowars from November 5 to 7 among
2,059 American adults.
American adults were asked the following question as
part of the poll:
Given the recent reports concerning the
threat posed by terrorists who plan to implant
bombs within their own bodies, how willing,
if at all, would you be to undergo a TSA body
cavity search in order to fly?
A total 30 percent of American adults said they
would be willing or somewhat willing to accept a
body cavity search; 57 percent would be completely
or somewhat unwilling to submit to it and 13
percent answered dont know.
Although the exact denition was not explained in the
question, given that the term body cavity search refers
to the most intrusive search imaginable, one normally
performed on dangerous felons before they go to prison,
the fact that almost one third of American adults would
submit to such an invasion of their privacy simply to get
on a plane is astounding.
Given the rash of stories about TSA agents touching
travelers genitals as part of pat down procedures for
those who opt out of body scanners, the poll posed the
following question:
In some cases, the TSAs more invasive pat
down procedures now include agents touching
travelers genital area through their clothing.
How acceptable, if at all, do you feel this is,
considering the potential major threat posed
by terrorists?
Despite the fact that this policy is already underway
in some instances, a full 65 percent of American adults
found TSA workers touching genitals completely
or somewhat unacceptable. A further 35 percent of
American adults found this completely or somewhat
acceptable. More Republicans than Democrats (12
percent to 9 percent) were likely to nd this completely
acceptable.
Those concerned with how much power has been
concentrated into the hands of TSA workers, who are
after all federal employees and not police ofcers,
would also be disturbed at the response to the following
question:
How reasonable or unreasonable do you feel
it is that travelers should be made by law to
obey every command given by a TSA agent
inside an airport or any other public place
given the threat posed by terrorists?
A total 57 percent of American adults said this was
completely or somewhat reasonable. A minority
of 43 percent said passing a law that would mandate
total obedience to a TSA agent was completely or
somewhat unreasonable. Further, only 16 percent of
people thought it was completely unreasonable.
Surprisingly, given their traditional distrust of big
government, 60 percent of Republicans thought it
reasonable compared to 64 percent of Democrats and 46
percent of Independents.
Asked how the TSA is performing in its screening
duties at U.S. Airports, 77 percent of American adults
said the federal agency was doing an excellent, good
or fair job. Only 23 percent of American adults thought
the TSA was doing a not very good job or a bad job in
its duties. Despite sustained negative media coverage of
the agencys activities, of that latter netcategory, only 9
percent in total thought the TSA was doing a bad job.
NEARLY ONE THIRD OF
AMERICANS WOULD
ACCEPT TSA BODY
CAVITY SEARCH IN
ORDER TO FLY
written by Paul Joseph Watson
INFOWARS.COM 24
A M E R I
C A N S
S U R R E N D E R
D I G N I
T Y
O R F S E C U R
I T Y
P O L I C E S T A T E N O W A R I V I N G R
More Democrats than Republicans (84 percent to
73 percent) responded that they thought the TSA was
doing an excellent, good or fair job.
The idea of mandating travelers wear an electric
shock bracelet sounds like something out of a dystopian
sci- movie, but the proposal was seriously considered
and very nearly implemented by the Department of
Homeland Security back in 2008.
According to a video put out by Avion Communications
Group, not only would the bracelets have been used
to deliver incapacitating electric shocks to suspected
terrorists, they would also have contained tracking
technology to spy on the wearer.
In reference to this, the survey asked the following
question:
In 2008, the Department of Homeland
Security expressed an interest in having
travelers wear electric shock bracelets that
would both track travelers through the airport
as well as allow airport officials and flight
crews to incapacitate potential terrorists.
How willing, if at all, would you be to wear such
a bracelet in order to fly?
An astounding 35 percent of American adults responded
that they would be completely or somewhat willing
to wear the shock bracelet. Republicans were more likely
to be willing than Democrats, 41 percent to 34 percent.
Only a slim majority of 52 percent said they would
be completely unwilling or somewhat unwilling
to wear the shock bracelet. The rest (13 percent)
responded dont know.
The fact that a sizable portion of American adults are
willing to wear a device that would allow a TSA agent
or other airline ofcial to arbitrarily deliver a paralyzing
electric shock similar to a taser gun is a shocking
indication of how much freedom and dignity Americans
are happy to give up in the name of security.
Given how close the DHS came to actually
implementing the plan, one wonders if it is likely to
rear its head once more.
In 2008, the Washington Times reported on how DHS
ofcial Paul S. Ruwaldt of the Science and Technology
Directorate, ofce of Research and Development,
wrote to Lamperd Less Lethal, Inc. indicating that
the Department of Homeland Security was ready to
purchase devices from the company that would be used
to deliver incapacitating shocks to airline passengers, all
of whom would be mandated to wear the shock bracelet
once they checked in for their ight.
In his letter, Ruwaldt also noted how the bracelet
could be used as a method of interrogation, in other
words a torture device. He also raised the prospect of
using the device against protesters to allow the
temporary restraint of large numbers of individuals in
open area environments by a small number of agents or
Law Enforcement Ofcers.
The letter stated that the DHS was interested
in. the immobilizing security bracelet and that
it was conceivable to envision a use to improve air
security, on passenger planes. Other letters made it
clear that the DOD, the CDC, Department of Interior,
Department of Agriculture Forestry service as well as
unnamed law enforcement agencies were also keen
on acquiring the device.
Following a wave of negative publicity, the DHS
pulled the plug on its interest in the electric shock
bracelet, and Lamperd Less Lethal, Inc. set about
removing the letters from Ruwaldt it had previously
proudly displayed on its website.
The results of this poll again underscore
how ignorant many Americans remain of their
rights at airports and other transport hubs
where TSA agents are present. The results also
clearly indicate that a substantial portion of
Americans, around one in three, are willing to
tolerate virtually any indignity if it is performed
in the name of safety and security.
To view the results of the survey in full please visit:
ht t p: / / s t at i c . pr i s onpl ane t . c om/ p/ i mage s /
november2012/poll.doc
Abbreviated Methodology
This survey was conducted online within the United
States by Harris Interactive on behalf of Free Speech
Systems from November 5-7 among 2,059 adults ages 18
and older. This online survey is not based on a probability
sample and therefore no estimate of theoretical sampling
error can be calculated. For complete survey methodology,
including weighting variables, please contact watson-
paul3@sky.com.
Paul Joseph Watson is editor and writer for the infowars
site www.prisonplanet.com. He is the author of Order
Out of Chaos. Watson is also a regular ll-in host for the
Alex Jones Show and Infowars Nightly News.
A PARTICULARLY
SHOCKING DISCOVERY
PRISONPLANET.COM 25
F
or years, the system denied that blood samples
from newborns were being taken at birth and
databased into DNA warehouses. Alex Jones and
other alternative researchers railed against it for
more than a decade. Now, that period of denial is over,
and the same system is instead declaring its right to do so.
Bioethicists in the Science Translational Medicine
journal argued that researchers should be able to retain
and peruse the genetic treasure trove of blood samples
taken during routine screenings at hospitals after birth,
despite long-standing objections over privacy, parental
rights and disclosure.
In fact, governments across the Western world
and almost every state in the United States have
been collecting, retaining, researching and cataloguing
genetic material of babies without any statutory authori-
ty to do so, and without parental knowledge for decades.
Long legal battles in states including Minnesota and
Texas have resulted in decisions requiring informed
consent over these practices, given the existence of
genetic privacy laws, and yet health departments and
other related entities have petitioned for exemptions
from these requirements. In essence, the state has, in
many cases, declared ownership over your DNA, keeping
genetic material indenitely. However, in Minnesota
and Texas, authorities have been ordered to destroy
millions of samples to comply with privacy laws.
Twila Brase, president of the Citizens Council on
Health Care, worked on many of these cases, and breaks
down the issue in the following video:
The DNA taken at birth from every citizen is essen-
tially owned by the government, and every citizen
becomes a potential subject of government-sponsored
genetic research, Brase states. It does not require
consent and there are no requirements to inform
parents about the warehousing of their childs DNA for
the purpose of genetic research.
A 2008 law signed by President George W. Bush
appears to give legitimacy to storing and researching
newborn genetic material, despite legal challenges and
outcry from people like Congressman Ron Paul, who say
the law is unconstitutional.
Now, bioethicists Michelle Huckaby Lewis, Michael E.
Scheurer, Robert C. Green and Amy L. McGuire have
written a white paper to argue for the legitimacy of
preserving these DNA samples for research, in spite of
parental objections and clear civil rights issues.
The abstract for their policy paper, Research Results:
Preserving Newborn Blood Samples, summarizes the issue:
Retention and use, without explicit parental permis-
sion, of residual dried blood samples from newborn
screening has generated
public controversy over
concerns about viola-
tions of family privacy
rights and loss of paren-
tal autonomy. The public
debate about this issue
has included little discus-
sion about the destruction
of a potentially valuable
public resource that can
be used for research
that may yield improve-
ments in public health.
The research community
must advocate for poli-
cies and infrastructure
that promote retention
of residual dried blood
samples and their use in
biomedical research.
These bioethicists
have complained that a
narrow view of privacy
is hampering research,
insisting instead that
the research commu-
nity must advocate for
policies that support the
retention of these samples
and their use in biomed-
ical research, as author
Michelle Lewis stated.
These DNA samples must be used to the fullest extent
possible to improve the health of our citizenry, accord-
ing to the authors.
The policy is squarely on the side of larger state
power, where the concerns of the individual are swept
aside in the name of the greater good. These authors
emphasize the potential for research in medical treat-
ments and other potentially life-saving solutions, and
yet the era has dawned where consumer-patients are
offered access to costly patented genetic interventions
where an individuals God-given genetic material is
sold back to them for a price.
It is an emerging paradigm of total state control over
life, reproduction, screening for designer babies and
other related areas controlled by the system for the
benet of insider crony corporate interests. And the
collectivist bioethicists, (who are really neo-eugeni-
cists), are arguing for so-called ethical tradeoffs in every
conceivable eld abortion, cloning, articial insem-
ination, end of life care (a.k.a. death panels), animal
rights, transhumanism, euthanasia, eugenics, life exten-
sion, human experimentation and much more.
Their philosophy, to empower the technocratic state
and selectively advance preferred individuals under that
system, comes from the classical Eugenics era, where
leading voices like T. H. Huxley, president of the Royal
Society of Science and grandfather of author Aldous
Huxley and biologist/UNESCO founder Julian Huxley,
argued that under eugenics, it is ethical to replace
inferior individuals (and their reproductive rights) with
that of superior individuals. It is an elitist creed that has
passed down from the ages and continues today in the
hands of the globalist cabal steering the emerging world
government system.
Leading bioethicists have argued, in ofcial white
papers mind you, that babies should be allowed to be
killed up to age 3, that health care rationing and death
panels are justiable, that water supplies should be
laced with lithium and other mind-altering drugs to
socially control the population, and much more.
After years of denying that blood samples
were taken at birth, bioethicists are arguing
for the governments right to seize newborns
blood samples for global database.
SYSTEM ANNOUNCES
IT WILL USE DNA
STOLEN FROM
BABIES
written by AARON DYKES
INFOWARS.COM
PRISONPLANET.COM
Last train out to get off the grid?
Amazing Solar Generator Is
Like Having A Secret Power
Plant Hidden In Your Home!
N
ew solar powered backup provides instant
electrical power in any outage or disaster.
If you have ever wanted to have an emergency
backup system that supplies continuous electrical power,
this will be the most important message you will ever read.
Here is why.
There is now a completely portable (and ultra-high
effcient) solar power generator which produces up to 1800
watts of household electricity on demand when you need it
most. News of this solar backup generator (its the frst
off-the-grid breakthrough in 50 years) is spreading like
wild fre all across the country!
Why?
The answer is easy. You see, this solar generator is
extremely powerful and yet very simple to use. It produces
continuous electricity and runs with absolutely no noise
whatsoever. It emits no fumes. But the best part about the
solar generator is that once you own one, you can...
Generate Free Electricity From The Sun!
Charged by the sun with a powerful solar panel, the unit
then stores the power for your use when you need it. We
all face natural disasters, with hurricanes, tornadoes, snow
and ice storms cutting off electrical power to millions of
Americans each year.
Then there are man-made disasters and outages.
Blackouts and rolling brownouts are becoming common in
many parts of the United States as our grid gets stretched
beyond its capacity.
The truth is, we are extremely vulnerable to all kinds
of meltdowns that can create temporary or even permanent
electrical outages. Thats why if you are one of the few
Americans that thinks ahead, you need to
Have A Solar Powered Backup In Place!
When you compare a solar generator to a gas generator,
the difference is pretty remarkable. Heres why. First, gas
generators make an incredible amount of racket if you
can even get them started in the frst place. With a gas
generator, you pull and pull some more, all because your
generator has been sitting in the cold and the carburetor is
playing hard to get. This, of course, is not a lot of fun in
the dark. Another reason to avoid gas generators is that you
just cant safely run one in your house. But the number one
reason you dont want to be caught in a time of crisis with a
gas generator is
Gas Stations Cant Pump Gas
Without Electricity!
Its true. When the power goes out, youre left with
whatever gas you have on hand because the gas station
pumps all run on electricity. A few gallons stored in a gas
can means a little electricity for a little while, then its
quickly back to black.
Heres the thing: I could go on and on about life without
electricity and what a nightmare gas generators can be.
But heres the bottom line: Solutions From Science is now
offering an amazing power generating system that can
provide plenty of electrical power in the event of an outage
or emergency. And the best part is that you can have the
power safely in your house.
A True Breakthrough In
Home Power Generation!
Let me try to explain the features and benefts of a solar
generator as simply as possible. If I could bring one over
to your house and let you start plugging in appliances, you
would immediately understand what all the fuss is about.
But I cant do that. Anyway, here are some of the reasons I
think youll want a solar generator:
#1. Maximum Power In Minimum Time.
The solar generator can be set up in just a few minutes.
Then, all you have to do is start plugging things in. It can run
both AC & DC appliances anywhere anytime.
#2. Back Up Power When You Need It Most.
Its called a solar backup because its designed to come
to your rescue when power trouble starts and your lights go
out. Run a small refrigerator (high effcient ones are best) to
keep your food from going bad.
#3. Portable Power.
If the going ever gets too tough where you are and you
decide to get out of dodge, you simply throw it in the car
and take off to a safer destination.
#4. Generates Permanent Power.
The unit provides 1800 watts of electricity at peak power.
Thats enough to run many appliances in your house. The
generator is recharged constantly by the sun allowing you
to use the system while charging it at the same time. Many
users choose to keep appliances plugged in permanently to
reduce electrical costs and help pay for the unit.
#5. Multiple Uses.
You can use your solar backup to run essential appliances
when emergencies arise. You can recharge phones,
run shortwave radios, televisions, lights, fre place or
furnace fans, as well as computers and printers. Plus,
if you need to work in the woods at the cabin or in a
boat, you can use the solar backup to run power tools,
trimmers, blowers and coffee makers.
#6. Plug And Play Means Instant Power.
The emergency backup system comes ready to
go. Just start plugging in your favorite household
essentials.
By the way... the units go for about $1697.00 plus
shipping and handling.
But Im going to show you a way around that. I
have negotiated a very special offer for readers of
InfoWars magazine.
Heres the deal. You can use coupon code IW201 to
get one for $200.00 off as a reader of InfoWars magazine.
To do that, the absolute fastest way to get one is by going
to the website at:
www.MySolarBackup.com
If you would like to order by phone, you can
call toll-free by dialing 877-327-0365. Tell whoever
answers that you want the Solar Backup Generator
system rushed to you and you have a coupon because
you are a reader of InfoWars magazine.
Or, if you prefer to pay by check or money order
(payable to Solutions From Science), simply send your
payment to:
Solutions From Science
Dept. Solar Backup IW201
815 W. Main St.
P.O. Box 518
Thomson, IL 61285
Im so convinced every American household needs
a Solar Generator, that Ive arranged for this special
deal to get one to you at this dirt cheap price. (When
you call, ask about their free shipping offer as well.)
Just hurry, call 877-327-0365
Sincerely,
Mike Walters
P.S. One more thing. Its very important.
Make sure you use coupon code IW201 to get all the
discounts you have coming as a reader of InfoWars
magazine.
BY MIKE WALTERS
STAFF WRITER, OFF THE GRID NEWS
C
O
N
T
I
N
U
E
D

O
N

P
G
.

3
2
C
O
N
T
I
N
U
E
D

O
N

P
G
.

3
2
T
h
i
s

m
a
y

w
e
l
l

b
e

t
h
e

l
a
s
t

t
i
m
e

I

s
p
e
a
k

o
n

t
h
e

H
o
u
s
e

F
l
o
o
r
.


A
t

t
h
e

e
n
d

o
f

t
h
e

y
e
a
r

I

l
l

l
e
a
v
e

C
o
n
g
r
e
s
s

a
f
t
e
r

2
3

y
e
a
r
s

i
n

o
f

c
e

o
v
e
r

a

3
6

y
e
a
r

p
e
r
i
o
d
.


M
y

g
o
a
l
s

i
n

1
9
7
6

w
e
r
e

t
h
e

s
a
m
e

a
s

t
h
e
y

a
r
e

t
o
d
a
y
:

p
r
o
m
o
t
e

p
e
a
c
e

a
n
d

p
r
o
s
p
e
r
i
t
y

b
y

a

s
t
r
i
c
t

a
d
h
e
r
e
n
c
e

t
o

t
h
e

p
r
i
n
c
i
p
l
e
s

o
f

i
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l

l
i
b
e
r
t
y
.
I
t

w
a
s

m
y

o
p
i
n
i
o
n
,

t
h
a
t

t
h
e

c
o
u
r
s
e

t
h
e

U
.
S
.

e
m
b
a
r
k
e
d

o
n

i
n

t
h
e

l
a
t
t
e
r

p
a
r
t

o
f

t
h
e

2
0
t
h

C
e
n
t
u
r
y

w
o
u
l
d

b
r
i
n
g

u
s

a

m
a
j
o
r

n
a
n
c
i
a
l

c
r
i
s
i
s

a
n
d

e
n
g
u
l
f

u
s

i
n

a

f
o
r
e
i
g
n

p
o
l
i
c
y

t
h
a
t

w
o
u
l
d

o
v
e
r
e
x
t
e
n
d

u
s

a
n
d

u
n
d
e
r
m
i
n
e

o
u
r

n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l

s
e
c
u
r
i
t
y
.
T
o

a
c
h
i
e
v
e

t
h
e

g
o
a
l
s

I

s
o
u
g
h
t
,

g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t

w
o
u
l
d

h
a
v
e

h
a
d

t
o

s
h
r
i
n
k

i
n

s
i
z
e

a
n
d

s
c
o
p
e
,

r
e
d
u
c
e

s
p
e
n
d
i
n
g
,

c
h
a
n
g
e

t
h
e

m
o
n
e
t
a
r
y

s
y
s
t
e
m
,

a
n
d

r
e
j
e
c
t

t
h
e

u
n
s
u
s
t
a
i
n
a
b
l
e

c
o
s
t
s

o
f

p
o
l
i
c
i
n
g

t
h
e

w
o
r
l
d

a
n
d

e
x
p
a
n
d
i
n
g

t
h
e

A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n

E
m
p
i
r
e
.
T
h
e

p
r
o
b
l
e
m
s

s
e
e
m
e
d

t
o

b
e

o
v
e
r
w
h
e
l
m
i
n
g

a
n
d

i
m
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e

t
o

s
o
l
v
e
,

y
e
t

f
r
o
m

m
y

v
i
e
w

p
o
i
n
t
,

j
u
s
t

f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g

t
h
e

c
o
n
s
t
r
a
i
n
t
s

p
l
a
c
e
d

o
n

t
h
e

f
e
d
e
r
a
l

g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t

b
y

t
h
e

C
o
n
s
t
i
t
u
t
i
o
n

w
o
u
l
d

h
a
v
e

b
e
e
n

a

g
o
o
d

p
l
a
c
e

t
o

s
t
a
r
t
.
H
o
w

M
u
c
h

D
i
d

I

A
c
c
o
m
p
l
i
s
h
?
I
n

m
a
n
y

w
a
y
s
,

a
c
c
o
r
d
i
n
g

t
o

c
o
n
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
a
l

w
i
s
d
o
m
,

m
y

o
f
f
-
a
n
d
-
o
n

c
a
r
e
e
r

i
n

C
o
n
g
r
e
s
s
,

f
r
o
m

1
9
7
6

t
o

2
0
1
2
,

a
c
c
o
m
p
l
i
s
h
e
d

v
e
r
y

l
i
t
t
l
e
.

N
o

n
a
m
e
d

l
e
g
i
s
l
a
t
i
o
n
,

n
o

n
a
m
e
d

f
e
d
e
r
a
l

b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s

o
r

h
i
g
h
w
a
y
s

t
h
a
n
k

g
o
o
d
n
e
s
s
.


I
n

s
p
i
t
e

o
f

m
y

e
f
f
o
r
t
s
,

t
h
e

g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t

h
a
s

g
r
o
w
n

e
x
p
o
n
e
n
t
i
a
l
l
y
,

t
a
x
e
s

r
e
m
a
i
n

e
x
c
e
s
s
i
v
e
,

a
n
d

t
h
e

p
r
o
l
i

c

i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e

o
f

i
n
c
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
b
l
e

r
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s

c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
s
.


W
a
r
s

a
r
e

c
o
n
s
t
a
n
t

a
n
d

p
u
r
s
u
e
d

w
i
t
h
o
u
t

C
o
n
g
r
e
s
s
i
o
n
a
l

d
e
c
l
a
r
a
t
i
o
n
,

d
e

c
i
t
s

r
i
s
e

t
o

t
h
e

s
k
y
,

p
o
v
e
r
t
y

i
s

r
a
m
p
a
n
t

a
n
d

d
e
p
e
n
d
e
n
c
y

o
n

t
h
e

f
e
d
e
r
a
l

g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t

i
s

n
o
w

w
o
r
s
e

t
h
a
n

a
n
y

t
i
m
e

i
n

o
u
r

h
i
s
t
o
r
y
.
A
l
l

t
h
i
s

w
i
t
h

m
i
n
i
m
a
l

c
o
n
c
e
r
n
s

f
o
r

t
h
e

d
e

c
i
t
s

a
n
d

u
n
f
u
n
d
e
d

l
i
a
b
i
l
i
t
i
e
s

t
h
a
t

c
o
m
m
o
n

s
e
n
s
e

t
e
l
l
s

u
s

c
a
n
n
o
t

g
o

o
n

m
u
c
h

l
o
n
g
e
r
.


A

g
r
a
n
d
,

b
u
t

n
e
v
e
r

m
e
n
t
i
o
n
e
d
,

b
i
p
a
r
t
i
s
a
n

a
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t

a
l
l
o
w
s

f
o
r

t
h
e

w
e
l
l
-
k
e
p
t

s
e
c
r
e
t

t
h
a
t

k
e
e
p
s

t
h
e

s
p
e
n
d
i
n
g

g
o
i
n
g
.


O
n
e

s
i
d
e

d
o
e
s
n

t

g
i
v
e

u
p

o
n
e

p
e
n
n
y

o
n

m
i
l
i
t
a
r
y

s
p
e
n
d
i
n
g
,

t
h
e

o
t
h
e
r

s
i
d
e

d
o
e
s
n

t

g
i
v
e

u
p

o
n
e

p
e
n
n
y

o
n

w
e
l
f
a
r
e

s
p
e
n
d
i
n
g
,

w
h
i
l
e

b
o
t
h

s
i
d
e
s

s
u
p
p
o
r
t

t
h
e

b
a
i
l
o
u
t
s

a
n
d

s
u
b
s
i
d
i
e
s

f
o
r

t
h
e

b
a
n
k
i
n
g

a
n
d


c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e

e
l
i
t
e
.


A
n
d

t
h
e

s
p
e
n
d
i
n
g

c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
s

a
s

t
h
e

e
c
o
n
o
m
y

w
e
a
k
e
n
s

a
n
d

t
h
e

d
o
w
n
w
a
r
d

s
p
i
r
a
l

c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
s
.



A
s

t
h
e

g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t

c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
s

d
d
l
i
n
g

a
r
o
u
n
d
,

o
u
r

l
i
b
e
r
t
i
e
s

a
n
d

o
u
r

w
e
a
l
t
h

b
u
r
n

i
n

t
h
e

a
m
e
s

o
f

a

f
o
r
e
i
g
n

p
o
l
i
c
y

t
h
a
t

m
a
k
e
s

u
s

l
e
s
s

s
a
f
e
.
T
h
e

m
a
j
o
r

s
t
u
m
b
l
i
n
g

b
l
o
c
k

t
o

r
e
a
l

c
h
a
n
g
e

i
n

W
a
s
h
i
n
g
t
o
n

i
s

t
h
e

t
o
t
a
l

r
e
s
i
s
t
a
n
c
e

t
o

a
d
m
i
t
t
i
n
g

t
h
a
t

t
h
e

c
o
u
n
t
r
y

i
s

b
r
o
k
e
.

T
h
i
s

h
a
s

m
a
d
e

c
o
m
p
r
o
m
i
s
i
n
g
,

j
u
s
t

t
o

a
g
r
e
e

t
o

i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e

s
p
e
n
d
i
n
g
,

i
n
e
v
i
t
a
b
l
e

s
i
n
c
e

n
e
i
t
h
e
r

s
i
d
e

h
a
s

a
n
y

i
n
t
e
n
t
i
o
n

o
f

c
u
t
t
i
n
g

s
p
e
n
d
i
n
g
.
T
h
e

c
o
u
n
t
r
y

a
n
d

t
h
e

C
o
n
g
r
e
s
s

w
i
l
l

r
e
m
a
i
n

d
i
v
i
s
i
v
e

s
i
n
c
e

t
h
e
r
e

s

n
o

l
o
o
t

l
e
f
t

t
o

d
i
v
v
y

u
p
.

W
i
t
h
o
u
t

t
h
i
s

r
e
c
o
g
n
i
t
i
o
n

t
h
e

s
p
e
n
d
e
r
s

i
n

W
a
s
h
i
n
g
t
o
n

w
i
l
l

c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e

t
h
e

m
a
r
c
h

t
o
w
a
r
d

a

s
c
a
l

c
l
i
f
f

m
u
c
h

b
i
g
g
e
r

t
h
a
n

t
h
e

o
n
e

a
n
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d

t
h
i
s

c
o
m
i
n
g

J
a
n
u
a
r
y
.
I

h
a
v
e

t
h
o
u
g
h
t

a

l
o
t

a
b
o
u
t

w
h
y

t
h
o
s
e

o
f

u
s

w
h
o

b
e
l
i
e
v
e

i
n

l
i
b
e
r
t
y
,

a
s

a

s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
,

h
a
v
e

d
o
n
e

s
o

p
o
o
r
l
y

i
n

c
o
n
v
i
n
c
i
n
g

o
t
h
e
r
s

o
f

i
t
s

b
e
n
e

t
s
.


I
f

m
o
n
e
t
a
r
y

s
y
s
t
e
m
,

i
t

w
a
s

d
o
o
m
e
d

t
o

f
a
i
l
.


W
e

h
a
v
e

e
n
d
e
d

u
p

w
i
t
h

a

s
y
s
t
e
m

t
h
a
t

d
o
e
s
n

t

p
r
o
d
u
c
e

e
n
o
u
g
h

e
v
e
n

t
o

n
a
n
c
e

t
h
e

d
e
b
t

a
n
d

n
o

f
u
n
d
a
m
e
n
t
a
l

u
n
d
e
r
s
t
a
n
d
i
n
g

o
f

w
h
y

a

f
r
e
e

s
o
c
i
e
t
y

i
s

c
r
u
c
i
a
l

t
o

r
e
v
e
r
s
i
n
g

t
h
e
s
e

t
r
e
n
d
s
.
I
f

t
h
i
s

i
s

n
o
t

r
e
c
o
g
n
i
z
e
d
,

t
h
e

r
e
c
o
v
e
r
y

w
i
l
l

l
i
n
g
e
r

f
o
r

a

l
o
n
g

t
i
m
e
.

B
i
g
g
e
r

g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
,

m
o
r
e

s
p
e
n
d
i
n
g
,

m
o
r
e

d
e
b
t
,

m
o
r
e

p
o
v
e
r
t
y

f
o
r

t
h
e

m
i
d
d
l
e

c
l
a
s
s
,

a
n
d

a

m
o
r
e

i
n
t
e
n
s
e

s
c
r
a
m
b
l
e

b
y

t
h
e

e
l
i
t
e

s
p
e
c
i
a
l

i
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
s

w
i
l
l

c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
.
W
e

N
e
e
d

a
n

I
n
t
e
l
l
e
c
t
u
a
l

A
w
a
k
e
n
i
n
g
W
i
t
h
o
u
t

a
n

i
n
t
e
l
l
e
c
t
u
a
l

a
w
a
k
e
n
i
n
g
,

t
h
e

t
u
r
n
i
n
g

p
o
i
n
t

w
i
l
l

b
e

d
r
i
v
e
n

b
y

e
c
o
n
o
m
i
c

l
a
w
.


A

d
o
l
l
a
r

c
r
i
s
i
s

w
i
l
l

b
r
i
n
g

t
h
e

c
u
r
r
e
n
t

o
u
t
-
o
f
-
c
o
n
t
r
o
l

s
y
s
t
e
m

t
o

i
t
s

k
n
e
e
s
.
I
f

i
t

s

n
o
t

a
c
c
e
p
t
e
d

t
h
a
t

b
i
g

g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
,

a
t

m
o
n
e
y
,

i
g
n
o
r
i
n
g

l
i
b
e
r
t
y
,

c
e
n
t
r
a
l

e
c
o
n
o
m
i
c

p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
,

w
e
l
f
a
r
i
s
m
,

a
n
d

w
a
r
f
a
r
i
s
m

c
a
u
s
e
d

o
u
r

c
r
i
s
i
s

w
e

c
a
n

e
x
p
e
c
t

a

c
o
n
t
i
n
u
o
u
s

a
n
d

d
a
n
g
e
r
o
u
s

m
a
r
c
h

t
o
w
a
r
d

c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
i
s
m

a
n
d

e
v
e
n

f
a
s
c
i
s
m

w
i
t
h

e
v
e
n

m
o
r
e

l
o
s
s

o
f

o
u
r

l
i
b
e
r
t
i
e
s
.

P
r
o
s
p
e
r
i
t
y

f
o
r

a

l
a
r
g
e

m
i
d
d
l
e

c
l
a
s
s

t
h
o
u
g
h

w
i
l
l

b
e
c
o
m
e

a
n

a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t

d
r
e
a
m
.
T
h
i
s

c
o
n
t
i
n
u
o
u
s

m
o
v
e

i
s

n
o

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
t

t
h
a
n

w
h
a
t

w
e

h
a
v
e

s
e
e
n

i
n

h
o
w

o
u
r

n
a
n
c
i
a
l

c
r
i
s
i
s

o
f

2
0
0
8

w
a
s

h
a
n
d
l
e
d
.


C
o
n
g
r
e
s
s

r
s
t

d
i
r
e
c
t
e
d
,

w
i
t
h

b
i
p
a
r
t
i
s
a
n

s
u
p
p
o
r
t
,

b
a
i
l
o
u
t
s

f
o
r

t
h
e

w
e
a
l
t
h
y
.


T
h
e
n

i
t

w
a
s

t
h
e

F
e
d
e
r
a
l

R
e
s
e
r
v
e

w
i
t
h

i
t
s

e
n
d
l
e
s
s

q
u
a
n
t
i
t
a
t
i
v
e

e
a
s
i
n
g
.

I
f

a
t

r
s
t

i
t

d
o
e
s
n

t

s
u
c
c
e
e
d

t
r
y

a
g
a
i
n
;

Q
E
1
,

Q
E
2
,

a
n
d

Q
E
3

a
n
d

w
i
t
h

n
o

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
e

t
r
y

Q
E

i
n
d
e

n
i
t
e
l
y

t
h
a
t

i
s

u
n
t
i
l

i
t

t
o
o

f
a
i
l
s
.


T
h
e
r
e

s

a

c
o
s
t

t
o

a
l
l

o
f

t
h
i
s

a
n
d

l
e
t

m
e

a
s
s
u
r
e

y
o
u

d
e
l
a
y
i
n
g

t
h
e

p
a
y
m
e
n
t

i
s

n
o

l
o
n
g
e
r

a
n

o
p
t
i
o
n
.


T
h
e

r
u
l
e
s

o
f

t
h
e

m
a
r
k
e
t

w
i
l
l

e
x
t
r
a
c
t

i
t
s

p
o
u
n
d

o
f

e
s
h

a
n
d

i
t

w
o
n

t

b
e

p
r
e
t
t
y
.
T
h
e

c
u
r
r
e
n
t

c
r
i
s
i
s

e
l
i
c
i
t
s

a

l
o
t

o
f

p
e
s
s
i
m
i
s
m
.


A
n
d

t
h
e

p
e
s
s
i
m
i
s
m

a
d
d
s

t
o

l
e
s
s

c
o
n

d
e
n
c
e

i
n

t
h
e

f
u
t
u
r
e
.


T
h
e

t
w
o

f
e
e
d

o
n

t
h
e
m
s
e
l
v
e
s
,

m
a
k
i
n
g

o
u
r

s
i
t
u
a
t
i
o
n

w
o
r
s
e
.
I
f

t
h
e

u
n
d
e
r
l
y
i
n
g

c
a
u
s
e

o
f

t
h
e

c
r
i
s
i
s

i
s

n
o
t

u
n
d
e
r
s
t
o
o
d

w
e

c
a
n
n
o
t

s
o
l
v
e

o
u
r

p
r
o
b
l
e
m
s
.

T
h
e

i
s
s
u
e
s

o
f

w
a
r
f
a
r
e
,

w
e
l
f
a
r
e
,

d
e

c
i
t
s
,

i
n

a
t
i
o
n
i
s
m
,

c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
i
s
m
,

b
a
i
l
o
u
t
s

a
n
d

a
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
a
r
i
a
n
i
s
m

c
a
n
n
o
t

b
e

i
g
n
o
r
e
d
.


B
y

o
n
l
y

e
x
p
a
n
d
i
n
g

t
h
e
s
e

p
o
l
i
c
i
e
s

w
e

c
a
n
n
o
t

e
x
p
e
c
t

g
o
o
d

r
e
s
u
l
t
s
.
E
v
e
r
y
o
n
e

c
l
a
i
m
s

s
u
p
p
o
r
t

f
o
r

f
r
e
e
d
o
m
.


B
u
t

t
o
o

o
f
t
e
n

i
t

s

f
o
r

o
n
e

s

o
w
n

f
r
e
e
d
o
m

a
n
d

n
o
t

f
o
r

o
t
h
e
r
s
.


T
o
o

m
a
n
y

b
e
l
i
e
v
e

t
h
a
t

t
h
e
r
e

m
u
s
t

b
e

l
i
m
i
t
s

o
n

f
r
e
e
d
o
m
.

T
h
e
y

a
r
g
u
e

t
h
a
t

f
r
e
e
d
o
m

m
u
s
t

b
e

d
i
r
e
c
t
e
d

a
n
d

m
a
n
a
g
e
d

t
o

a
c
h
i
e
v
e

f
a
i
r
n
e
s
s

a
n
d

e
q
u
a
l
i
t
y

t
h
u
s

m
a
k
i
n
g

i
t

a
c
c
e
p
t
a
b
l
e

t
o

c
u
r
t
a
i
l
,

t
h
r
o
u
g
h

f
o
r
c
e
,

c
e
r
t
a
i
n

l
i
b
e
r
t
i
e
s
.
S
o
m
e

d
e
c
i
d
e

w
h
a
t

a
n
d

w
h
o
s
e

f
r
e
e
d
o
m
s

a
r
e

t
o

b
e

l
i
m
i
t
e
d
.


T
h
e
s
e

a
r
e

t
h
e

p
o
l
i
t
i
c
i
a
n
s

w
h
o
s
e

g
o
a
l

i
n

l
i
f
e

i
s

p
o
w
e
r
.

T
h
e
i
r

s
u
c
c
e
s
s

d
e
p
e
n
d
s

o
n

g
a
i
n
i
n
g

s
u
p
p
o
r
t

f
r
o
m

s
p
e
c
i
a
l

i
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
s
.
N
o

M
o
r
e

i
s
m
s

T
h
e

g
r
e
a
t

n
e
w
s

i
s

t
h
e

a
n
s
w
e
r

i
s

n
o
t

t
o

b
e

f
o
u
n
d

i
n

m
o
r
e

i
s
m
s
.

T
h
e

a
n
s
w
e
r
s

a
r
e

t
o

b
e

f
o
u
n
d

i
n

m
o
r
e

l
i
b
e
r
t
y

w
h
i
c
h

c
o
s
t

s
o

m
u
c
h

l
e
s
s
.

U
n
d
e
r

t
h
e
s
e

c
i
r
c
u
m
s
t
a
n
c
e
s

s
p
e
n
d
i
n
g

g
o
e
s

d
o
w
n
,

w
e
a
l
t
h

p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n

g
o
e
s

u
p
,

a
n
d

t
h
e

q
u
a
l
i
t
y

o
f

l
i
f
e

i
m
p
r
o
v
e
s
.
J
u
s
t

t
h
i
s

r
e
c
o
g
n
i
t
i
o
n

e
s
p
e
c
i
a
l
l
y

i
f

w
e

m
o
v
e

i
n

t
h
i
s

d
i
r
e
c
t
i
o
n

i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
s

o
p
t
i
m
i
s
m

w
h
i
c
h

i
n

i
t
s
e
l
f

i
s

b
e
n
e

c
i
a
l
.


T
h
e

f
o
l
l
o
w

t
h
r
o
u
g
h

a
s

m
a
n
d
a
t
e
d

b
y

t
h
e

C
o
n
s
t
i
t
u
t
i
o
n
?

W
h
y

i
s

G
e
r
m
a
n
y

c
o
n
c
e
r
n
e
d

e
n
o
u
g
h

t
o

c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r

r
e
p
a
t
r
i
a
t
i
n
g

t
h
e
i
r

g
o
l
d

h
e
l
d

b
y

t
h
e

F
E
D

f
o
r

h
e
r

i
n

N
e
w

Y
o
r
k
?


I
s

i
t

t
h
a
t

t
h
e

t
r
u
s
t

i
n

t
h
e

U
.
S
.

a
n
d

d
o
l
l
a
r

s
u
p
r
e
m
a
c
y

b
e
g
i
n
n
i
n
g

t
o

w
a
n
e
?

W
h
y

d
o

o
u
r

p
o
l
i
t
i
c
a
l

l
e
a
d
e
r
s

b
e
l
i
e
v
e

i
t

s

u
n
n
e
c
e
s
s
a
r
y

t
o

t
h
o
r
o
u
g
h
l
y

a
u
d
i
t

o
u
r

o
w
n

g
o
l
d
?

W
h
y

c
a
n

t

A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n
s

d
e
c
i
d
e

w
h
i
c
h

t
y
p
e

o
f

l
i
g
h
t

b
u
l
b
s

t
h
e
y

c
a
n

b
u
y
?

W
h
y

i
s

t
h
e

T
S
A

p
e
r
m
i
t
t
e
d

t
o

a
b
u
s
e

t
h
e

r
i
g
h
t
s

o
f

a
n
y

A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n

t
r
a
v
e
l
i
n
g

b
y

a
i
r
?

W
h
y

s
h
o
u
l
d

t
h
e
r
e

b
e

m
a
n
d
a
t
o
r
y

s
e
n
t
e
n
c
e
s

e
v
e
n

u
p

t
o

l
i
f
e

f
o
r

c
r
i
m
e
s

w
i
t
h
o
u
t

v
i
c
t
i
m
s

a
s

o
u
r

d
r
u
g

l
a
w
s

r
e
q
u
i
r
e
?

W
h
y

h
a
v
e

w
e

a
l
l
o
w
e
d

t
h
e

f
e
d
e
r
a
l

g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t

t
o

r
e
g
u
l
a
t
e

c
o
m
m
o
d
e
s

i
n

o
u
r

h
o
m
e
s
?

W
h
y

i
s

i
t

p
o
l
i
t
i
c
a
l

s
u
i
c
i
d
e

f
o
r

a
n
y
o
n
e

t
o

c
r
i
t
i
c
i
z
e

A
I
P
A
C

?

W
h
y

h
a
v
e
n

t

w
e

g
i
v
e
n

u
p

o
n

t
h
e

d
r
u
g

w
a
r

s
i
n
c
e

i
t

s

a
n

o
b
v
i
o
u
s

f
a
i
l
u
r
e

a
n
d

v
i
o
l
a
t
e
s

t
h
e

p
e
o
p
l
e

s

r
i
g
h
t
s
?

H
a
s

n
o
b
o
d
y

n
o
t
i
c
e
d

t
h
a
t

t
h
e

a
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
i
e
s

c
a
n

t

e
v
e
n

k
e
e
p

d
r
u
g
s

o
u
t

o
f

t
h
e

p
r
i
s
o
n
s
?

H
o
w

c
a
n

m
a
k
i
n
g

o
u
r

e
n
t
i
r
e

s
o
c
i
e
t
y

a

p
r
i
s
o
n

s
o
l
v
e

t
h
e

p
r
o
b
l
e
m
?

W
h
y

d
o

w
e

s
a
c
r
i

c
e

s
o

m
u
c
h

g
e
t
t
i
n
g

n
e
e
d
l
e
s
s
l
y

i
n
v
o
l
v
e
d

i
n

b
o
r
d
e
r

d
i
s
p
u
t
e
s

a
n
d

c
i
v
i
l

s
t
r
i
f
e

a
r
o
u
n
d

t
h
e

w
o
r
l
d

a
n
d

i
g
n
o
r
e

t
h
e

r
o
o
t

c
a
u
s
e

o
f

t
h
e

m
o
s
t

d
e
a
d
l
y

b
o
r
d
e
r

i
n

t
h
e

w
o
r
l
d
-
t
h
e

o
n
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

M
e
x
i
c
o

a
n
d

t
h
e

U
S
?

W
h
y

d
o
e
s

C
o
n
g
r
e
s
s

w
i
l
l
i
n
g
l
y

g
i
v
e

u
p

i
t
s

p
r
e
r
o
g
a
t
i
v
e
s

t
o

t
h
e

E
x
e
c
u
t
i
v
e

B
r
a
n
c
h
?

W
h
y

d
o
e
s

c
h
a
n
g
i
n
g

t
h
e

p
a
r
t
y

i
n

p
o
w
e
r

n
e
v
e
r

c
h
a
n
g
e

p
o
l
i
c
y
?

C
o
u
l
d

i
t

b
e

t
h
a
t

t
h
e

v
i
e
w
s

o
f

b
o
t
h

p
a
r
t
i
e
s

a
r
e

e
s
s
e
n
t
i
a
l
l
y

t
h
e

s
a
m
e
?

W
h
y

d
i
d

t
h
e

b
i
g

b
a
n
k
s
,

t
h
e

l
a
r
g
e

c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
,

a
n
d

f
o
r
e
i
g
n

b
a
n
k
s

a
n
d

f
o
r
e
i
g
n

c
e
n
t
r
a
l

b
a
n
k
s

g
e
t

b
a
i
l
e
d

o
u
t

i
n

2
0
0
8

a
n
d

t
h
e

m
i
d
d
l
e

c
l
a
s
s

l
o
s
t

t
h
e
i
r

j
o
b
s

a
n
d

t
h
e
i
r

h
o
m
e
s
?

W
h
y

d
o

s
o

m
a
n
y

i
n

t
h
e

g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t

a
n
d

t
h
e

f
e
d
e
r
a
l

o
f

c
i
a
l
s

b
e
l
i
e
v
e

t
h
a
t

c
r
e
a
t
i
n
g

m
o
n
e
y

o
u
t

o
f

t
h
i
n

a
i
r

c
r
e
a
t
e
s

w
e
a
l
t
h
?

W
h
y

d
o

s
o

m
a
n
y

a
c
c
e
p
t

t
h
e

d
e
e
p
l
y

a
w
e
d

p
r
i
n
c
i
p
l
e

t
h
a
t

g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t

b
u
r
e
a
u
c
r
a
t
s

a
n
d

p
o
l
i
t
i
c
i
a
n
s

c
a
n

p
r
o
t
e
c
t

u
s

f
r
o
m

o
u
r
s
e
l
v
e
s

w
i
t
h
o
u
t

t
o
t
a
l
l
y

d
e
s
t
r
o
y
i
n
g

t
h
e

p
r
i
n
c
i
p
l
e

o
f

l
i
b
e
r
t
y
?

W
h
y

c
a
n

t

p
e
o
p
l
e

u
n
d
e
r
s
t
a
n
d

t
h
a
t

w
a
r

a
l
w
a
y
s

d
e
s
t
r
o
y
s

w
e
a
l
t
h

a
n
d

l
i
b
e
r
t
y
?

W
h
y

i
s

t
h
e
r
e

s
o

l
i
t
t
l
e

c
o
n
c
e
r
n

f
o
r

t
h
e

E
x
e
c
u
t
i
v
e

O
r
d
e
r

t
h
a
t

g
i
v
e
s

t
h
e

P
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t

a
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y

t
o

e
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h

a

k
i
l
l

l
i
s
t
,

i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g

A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n

c
i
t
i
z
e
n
s
,

o
f

t
h
o
s
e

t
a
r
g
e
t
e
d

f
o
r

a
s
s
a
s
s
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
?

W
h
y

i
s

p
a
t
r
i
o
t
i
s
m

t
h
o
u
g
h
t

t
o

b
e

b
l
i
n
d

l
o
y
a
l
t
y

t
o

t
h
e

g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t

a
n
d

t
h
e

p
o
l
i
t
i
c
i
a
n
s

w
h
o

r
u
n

i
t
,

r
a
t
h
e
r

t
h
a
n

l
o
y
a
l
t
y

t
o

t
h
e

p
r
i
n
c
i
p
l
e
s

o
f

l
i
b
e
r
t
y

a
n
d

s
u
p
p
o
r
t

f
o
r

t
h
e

p
e
o
p
l
e
?

R
e
a
l

p
a
t
r
i
o
t
i
s
m

i
s

a

w
i
l
l
i
n
g
n
e
s
s

t
o

c
h
a
l
l
e
n
g
e

t
h
e

g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t

w
h
e
n

i
t

s

w
r
o
n
g
.

W
h
y

i
s

i
t

i
s

c
l
a
i
m
e
d

t
h
a
t

i
f

p
e
o
p
l
e

w
o
n

t


o
r

c
a
n

t

t
a
k
e

c
a
r
e

o
f

t
h
e
i
r

o
w
n

n
e
e
d
s
,

t
h
a
t

p
e
o
p
l
e

i
n

g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t

c
a
n

d
o

i
t

f
o
r

t
h
e
m
?

W
h
y

d
i
d

w
e

e
v
e
r

g
i
v
e

t
h
e

g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t

a

s
a
f
e

h
a
v
e
n

f
o
r

i
n
i
t
i
a
t
i
n
g

v
i
o
l
e
n
c
e

a
g
a
i
n
s
t

t
h
e

p
e
o
p
l
e
?

W
h
y

d
o

s
o
m
e

m
e
m
b
e
r
s

d
e
f
e
n
d

f
r
e
e

m
a
r
k
e
t
s
,

b
u
t

n
o
t

c
i
v
i
l

l
i
b
e
r
t
i
e
s
?

W
h
y

d
o

s
o
m
e

m
e
m
b
e
r
s

d
e
f
e
n
d

c
i
v
i
l

l
i
b
e
r
t
i
e
s

b
u
t

n
o
t

f
r
e
e

m
a
r
k
e
t
s
?

C
O
N
T
I
N
U
E
D

O
N

P
G
.

3
2
C
O
N
T
I
N
U
E
D

O
N

P
G
.

3
2
C
O
N
T
I
N
U
E
D

O
N

P
G
.

3
2
l
i
b
e
r
t
y

i
s

w
h
a
t

w
e

c
l
a
i
m

i
t

i
s
-

t
h
e

p
r
i
n
c
i
p
l
e

t
h
a
t

p
r
o
t
e
c
t
s

a
l
l

p
e
r
s
o
n
a
l
,

s
o
c
i
a
l

a
n
d

e
c
o
n
o
m
i
c

d
e
c
i
s
i
o
n
s

n
e
c
e
s
s
a
r
y

f
o
r

m
a
x
i
m
u
m

p
r
o
s
p
e
r
i
t
y

a
n
d

t
h
e

b
e
s
t

c
h
a
n
c
e

f
o
r

p
e
a
c
e
-

i
t

s
h
o
u
l
d

b
e

a
n

e
a
s
y

s
e
l
l
.


Y
e
t
,

h
i
s
t
o
r
y

h
a
s

s
h
o
w
n

t
h
a
t

t
h
e

m
a
s
s
e
s

h
a
v
e

b
e
e
n

q
u
i
t
e

r
e
c
e
p
t
i
v
e

t
o

t
h
e

p
r
o
m
i
s
e
s

o
f

a
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
a
r
i
a
n
s

w
h
i
c
h

a
r
e

r
a
r
e
l
y

i
f

e
v
e
r

f
u
l

l
l
e
d
.
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
a
r
i
a
n
i
s
m

v
s
.

L
i
b
e
r
t
y
I
f

a
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
a
r
i
a
n
i
s
m

l
e
a
d
s

t
o

p
o
v
e
r
t
y

a
n
d

w
a
r

a
n
d

l
e
s
s

f
r
e
e
d
o
m

f
o
r

a
l
l

i
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
s

a
n
d

i
s

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
l
e
d

b
y

r
i
c
h

s
p
e
c
i
a
l

i
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
s
,

t
h
e

p
e
o
p
l
e

s
h
o
u
l
d

b
e

b
e
g
g
i
n
g

f
o
r

l
i
b
e
r
t
y
.


T
h
e
r
e

c
e
r
t
a
i
n
l
y

w
a
s

a

s
t
r
o
n
g

e
n
o
u
g
h

s
e
n
t
i
m
e
n
t

f
o
r

m
o
r
e

f
r
e
e
d
o
m

a
t

t
h
e

t
i
m
e

o
f

o
u
r

f
o
u
n
d
i
n
g

t
h
a
t

m
o
t
i
v
a
t
e
d

t
h
o
s
e

w
h
o

w
e
r
e

w
i
l
l
i
n
g

t
o

g
h
t

i
n

t
h
e

r
e
v
o
l
u
t
i
o
n

a
g
a
i
n
s
t

t
h
e

p
o
w
e
r
f
u
l

B
r
i
t
i
s
h

g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
.
D
u
r
i
n
g

m
y

t
i
m
e

i
n

C
o
n
g
r
e
s
s

t
h
e

a
p
p
e
t
i
t
e

f
o
r

l
i
b
e
r
t
y

h
a
s

b
e
e
n

q
u
i
t
e

w
e
a
k
;

t
h
e

u
n
d
e
r
s
t
a
n
d
i
n
g

o
f

i
t
s

s
i
g
n
i

c
a
n
c
e

n
e
g
l
i
g
i
b
l
e
.


Y
e
t

t
h
e

g
o
o
d

n
e
w
s

i
s

t
h
a
t

c
o
m
p
a
r
e
d

t
o

1
9
7
6

w
h
e
n

I

r
s
t

c
a
m
e

t
o

C
o
n
g
r
e
s
s
,

t
h
e

d
e
s
i
r
e

f
o
r

m
o
r
e

f
r
e
e
d
o
m

a
n
d

l
e
s
s

g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t

i
n

2
0
1
2

i
s

m
u
c
h

g
r
e
a
t
e
r

a
n
d

g
r
o
w
i
n
g
,

e
s
p
e
c
i
a
l
l
y

i
n

g
r
a
s
s
r
o
o
t
s

A
m
e
r
i
c
a
.

T
e
n
s

o
f

t
h
o
u
s
a
n
d
s

o
f

t
e
e
n
a
g
e
r
s

a
n
d

c
o
l
l
e
g
e

a
g
e

s
t
u
d
e
n
t
s

a
r
e
,

w
i
t
h

g
r
e
a
t

e
n
t
h
u
s
i
a
s
m
,

w
e
l
c
o
m
i
n
g

t
h
e

m
e
s
s
a
g
e

o
f

l
i
b
e
r
t
y
.
I

h
a
v
e

a

f
e
w

t
h
o
u
g
h
t
s

a
s

t
o

w
h
y

t
h
e

p
e
o
p
l
e

o
f

a

c
o
u
n
t
r
y

l
i
k
e

o
u
r
s
,

o
n
c
e

t
h
e

f
r
e
e
s
t

a
n
d

m
o
s
t

p
r
o
s
p
e
r
o
u
s
,

a
l
l
o
w
e
d

t
h
e

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s

t
o

d
e
t
e
r
i
o
r
a
t
e

t
o

t
h
e

d
e
g
r
e
e

t
h
a
t

t
h
e
y

h
a
v
e
.
F
r
e
e
d
o
m
,

p
r
i
v
a
t
e

p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
,

a
n
d

e
n
f
o
r
c
e
a
b
l
e

v
o
l
u
n
t
a
r
y

c
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
s
,

g
e
n
e
r
a
t
e

w
e
a
l
t
h
.


I
n

o
u
r

e
a
r
l
y

h
i
s
t
o
r
y

w
e

w
e
r
e

v
e
r
y

m
u
c
h

a
w
a
r
e

o
f

t
h
i
s
.


B
u
t

i
n

t
h
e

e
a
r
l
y

p
a
r
t

o
f

t
h
e

2
0
t
h

c
e
n
t
u
r
y

o
u
r

p
o
l
i
t
i
c
i
a
n
s

p
r
o
m
o
t
e
d

t
h
e

n
o
t
i
o
n

t
h
a
t

t
h
e

t
a
x

a
n
d

m
o
n
e
t
a
r
y

s
y
s
t
e
m
s

h
a
d

t
o

c
h
a
n
g
e

i
f

w
e

w
e
r
e

t
o

i
n
v
o
l
v
e

o
u
r
s
e
l
v
e
s

i
n

e
x
c
e
s
s
i
v
e

d
o
m
e
s
t
i
c

a
n
d

m
i
l
i
t
a
r
y

s
p
e
n
d
i
n
g
.

T
h
a
t

i
s

w
h
y

C
o
n
g
r
e
s
s

g
a
v
e

u
s

t
h
e

F
e
d
e
r
a
l

R
e
s
e
r
v
e

a
n
d

t
h
e

i
n
c
o
m
e

t
a
x
.


T
h
e

m
a
j
o
r
i
t
y

o
f

A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n
s

a
n
d

m
a
n
y

g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t

o
f

c
i
a
l
s

a
g
r
e
e
d

t
h
a
t

s
a
c
r
i

c
i
n
g

s
o
m
e

l
i
b
e
r
t
y

w
a
s

n
e
c
e
s
s
a
r
y

t
o

c
a
r
r
y

o
u
t

w
h
a
t

s
o
m
e

c
l
a
i
m
e
d

t
o

b
e

p
r
o
g
r
e
s
s
i
v
e

i
d
e
a
s
.

P
u
r
e

d
e
m
o
c
r
a
c
y

b
e
c
a
m
e

a
c
c
e
p
t
a
b
l
e
.
T
h
e
y

f
a
i
l
e
d

t
o

r
e
c
o
g
n
i
z
e
d

t
h
a
t

w
h
a
t

t
h
e
y

w
e
r
e

d
o
i
n
g

w
a
s

e
x
a
c
t
l
y

o
p
p
o
s
i
t
e

o
f

w
h
a
t

t
h
e

c
o
l
o
n
i
s
t
s

w
e
r
e

s
e
e
k
i
n
g

w
h
e
n

t
h
e
y

b
r
o
k
e

a
w
a
y

f
r
o
m

t
h
e

B
r
i
t
i
s
h
.
S
o
m
e

c
o
m
p
l
a
i
n

t
h
a
t

m
y

a
r
g
u
m
e
n
t
s

m
a
k
e
s

n
o

s
e
n
s
e
,

s
i
n
c
e

g
r
e
a
t

w
e
a
l
t
h

a
n
d

t
h
e

s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d

o
f

l
i
v
i
n
g

i
m
p
r
o
v
e
d


f
o
r

m
a
n
y

A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n
s

o
v
e
r

t
h
e

l
a
s
t

1
0
0

y
e
a
r
s
,

e
v
e
n

w
i
t
h

t
h
e
s
e

n
e
w

p
o
l
i
c
i
e
s
.
B
u
t

t
h
e

d
a
m
a
g
e

t
o

t
h
e

m
a
r
k
e
t

e
c
o
n
o
m
y
,

a
n
d

t
h
e

c
u
r
r
e
n
c
y
,

h
a
s

b
e
e
n

i
n
s
i
d
i
o
u
s

a
n
d

s
t
e
a
d
y
.


I
t

t
o
o
k

a

l
o
n
g

t
i
m
e

t
o

c
o
n
s
u
m
e

o
u
r

w
e
a
l
t
h
,

d
e
s
t
r
o
y

t
h
e

c
u
r
r
e
n
c
y

a
n
d

u
n
d
e
r
m
i
n
e

p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
v
i
t
y

a
n
d

g
e
t

o
u
r

n
a
n
c
i
a
l

o
b
l
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
s

t
o

a

p
o
i
n
t

o
f

n
o

r
e
t
u
r
n
.

C
o
n

d
e
n
c
e

s
o
m
e
t
i
m
e
s

l
a
s
t
s

l
o
n
g
e
r

t
h
a
n

d
e
s
e
r
v
e
d
.

M
o
s
t

o
f

o
u
r

w
e
a
l
t
h

t
o
d
a
y

d
e
p
e
n
d
s

o
n

d
e
b
t
.
T
h
e

w
e
a
l
t
h

t
h
a
t

w
e

e
n
j
o
y
e
d

a
n
d

s
e
e
m
e
d

t
o

b
e

e
n
d
l
e
s
s
,

a
l
l
o
w
e
d

c
o
n
c
e
r
n

f
o
r

t
h
e

p
r
i
n
c
i
p
l
e

o
f

a

f
r
e
e

s
o
c
i
e
t
y

t
o

b
e

n
e
g
l
e
c
t
e
d
.


A
s

l
o
n
g

a
s

m
o
s
t

p
e
o
p
l
e

b
e
l
i
e
v
e
d

t
h
e

m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l

a
b
u
n
d
a
n
c
e

w
o
u
l
d

l
a
s
t

f
o
r
e
v
e
r
,

w
o
r
r
y
i
n
g

a
b
o
u
t

p
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
n
g

a

c
o
m
p
e
t
i
t
i
v
e

p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
v
e

e
c
o
n
o
m
y

a
n
d

i
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l

l
i
b
e
r
t
y

s
e
e
m
e
d

u
n
n
e
c
e
s
s
a
r
y
.
T
h
e

A
g
e

o
f

R
e
d
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
T
h
i
s

n
e
g
l
e
c
t

u
s
h
e
r
e
d

i
n

a
n

a
g
e

o
f

r
e
d
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n

o
f

w
e
a
l
t
h

b
y

g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t

k
o
w
t
o
w
i
n
g

t
o

a
n
y

a
n
d

a
l
l

s
p
e
c
i
a
l

i
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
s
,

e
x
c
e
p
t

f
o
r

t
h
o
s
e

w
h
o

j
u
s
t

w
a
n
t
e
d

t
o

l
e
f
t

a
l
o
n
e
.


T
h
a
t

i
s

w
h
y

t
o
d
a
y

m
o
n
e
y

i
n

p
o
l
i
t
i
c
s

f
a
r

s
u
r
p
a
s
s
e
s

m
o
n
e
y

c
u
r
r
e
n
t
l
y

g
o
i
n
g

i
n
t
o

r
e
s
e
a
r
c
h

a
n
d

d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t

a
n
d

p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
v
e

e
n
t
r
e
p
r
e
n
e
u
r
i
a
l

e
f
f
o
r
t
s
.
T
h
e

m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l

b
e
n
e

t
s

b
e
c
a
m
e

m
o
r
e

i
m
p
o
r
t
a
n
t

t
h
a
n

t
h
e

u
n
d
e
r
s
t
a
n
d
i
n
g

a
n
d

p
r
o
m
o
t
i
n
g

t
h
e

p
r
i
n
c
i
p
l
e
s

o
f

l
i
b
e
r
t
y

a
n
d

a

f
r
e
e

m
a
r
k
e
t
.


I
t

i
s

g
o
o
d

t
h
a
t

m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l

a
b
u
n
d
a
n
c
e

i
s

a

r
e
s
u
l
t

o
f

l
i
b
e
r
t
y

b
u
t

i
f

m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
i
s
m

i
s

a
l
l

t
h
a
t

w
e

c
a
r
e

a
b
o
u
t
,

p
r
o
b
l
e
m
s

a
r
e

g
u
a
r
a
n
t
e
e
d
.
T
h
e

c
r
i
s
i
s

a
r
r
i
v
e
d

b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

i
l
l
u
s
i
o
n

t
h
a
t

w
e
a
l
t
h

a
n
d

p
r
o
s
p
e
r
i
t
y

w
o
u
l
d

l
a
s
t

f
o
r
e
v
e
r

h
a
s

e
n
d
e
d
.

S
i
n
c
e

i
t

w
a
s

b
a
s
e
d

o
n

d
e
b
t

a
n
d

a

p
r
e
t
e
n
s
e

t
h
a
t

d
e
b
t

c
a
n

b
e

p
a
p
e
r
e
d

o
v
e
r

b
y

a
n

o
u
t
-
o
f
-
c
o
n
t
r
o
l

a
t

w
i
t
h

s
o
u
n
d

p
o
l
i
c
i
e
s

a
r
e

r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d

w
h
i
c
h

m
u
s
t

b
e

u
n
d
e
r
s
t
o
o
d

a
n
d

s
u
p
p
o
r
t
e
d

b
y

t
h
e

p
e
o
p
l
e
.
B
u
t

t
h
e
r
e

i
s

g
o
o
d

e
v
i
d
e
n
c
e

t
h
a
t

t
h
e

g
e
n
e
r
a
t
i
o
n

c
o
m
i
n
g

o
f

a
g
e

a
t

t
h
e

p
r
e
s
e
n
t

t
i
m
e

i
s

s
u
p
p
o
r
t
i
v
e

o
f

m
o
v
i
n
g

i
n

t
h
e

d
i
r
e
c
t
i
o
n

o
f

m
o
r
e

l
i
b
e
r
t
y

a
n
d

s
e
l
f
-
r
e
l
i
a
n
c
e
.

T
h
e

m
o
r
e

t
h
i
s

c
h
a
n
g
e

i
n

d
i
r
e
c
t
i
o
n

a
n
d

t
h
e

s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
s

b
e
c
o
m
e

k
n
o
w
n
,

t
h
e

q
u
i
c
k
e
r

w
i
l
l

b
e

t
h
e

r
e
t
u
r
n

o
f

o
p
t
i
m
i
s
m
.
O
u
r

j
o
b
,

f
o
r

t
h
o
s
e

o
f

u
s

w
h
o

b
e
l
i
e
v
e

t
h
a
t

a

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
t

s
y
s
t
e
m

t
h
a
n

t
h
e


o
n
e

t
h
a
t

w
e

h
a
v
e


h
a
d

f
o
r

t
h
e


l
a
s
t

1
0
0

y
e
a
r
s
,

h
a
s

d
r
i
v
e
n

u
s

t
o

t
h
i
s

u
n
s
u
s
t
a
i
n
a
b
l
e

c
r
i
s
i
s
,

i
s

t
o

b
e

m
o
r
e

c
o
n
v
i
n
c
i
n
g

t
h
a
t

t
h
e
r
e

i
s

a

w
o
n
d
e
r
f
u
l
,

u
n
c
o
m
p
l
i
c
a
t
e
d
,

a
n
d

m
o
r
a
l

s
y
s
t
e
m

t
h
a
t

p
r
o
v
i
d
e
s

t
h
e

a
n
s
w
e
r
s
.


W
e

h
a
d

a

t
a
s
t
e

o
f

i
t

i
n

o
u
r

e
a
r
l
y

h
i
s
t
o
r
y
.

W
e

n
e
e
d

n
o
t

g
i
v
e

u
p

o
n

t
h
e

n
o
t
i
o
n

o
f

a
d
v
a
n
c
i
n
g

t
h
i
s

c
a
u
s
e
.
I
t

w
o
r
k
e
d
,

b
u
t

w
e

a
l
l
o
w
e
d

o
u
r

l
e
a
d
e
r
s

t
o

c
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
e

o
n

t
h
e

m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l

a
b
u
n
d
a
n
c
e

t
h
a
t

f
r
e
e
d
o
m

g
e
n
e
r
a
t
e
s
,

w
h
i
l
e

i
g
n
o
r
i
n
g

f
r
e
e
d
o
m

i
t
s
e
l
f
.

N
o
w

w
e

h
a
v
e

n
e
i
t
h
e
r
,

b
u
t

t
h
e

d
o
o
r

i
s

o
p
e
n
,

o
u
t

o
f

n
e
c
e
s
s
i
t
y
,

f
o
r

a
n

a
n
s
w
e
r
.


T
h
e

a
n
s
w
e
r

a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e

i
s

b
a
s
e
d

o
n

t
h
e

C
o
n
s
t
i
t
u
t
i
o
n
,

i
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l

l
i
b
e
r
t
y

a
n
d

p
r
o
h
i
b
i
t
i
n
g

t
h
e

u
s
e

o
f

g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t

f
o
r
c
e

t
o

p
r
o
v
i
d
e

p
r
i
v
i
l
e
g
e
s

a
n
d

b
e
n
e

t
s

t
o

a
l
l

s
p
e
c
i
a
l

i
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
s
.
A
f
t
e
r

o
v
e
r

1
0
0

y
e
a
r
s

w
e

f
a
c
e

a

s
o
c
i
e
t
y

q
u
i
t
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
t

f
r
o
m

t
h
e

o
n
e

t
h
a
t

w
a
s

i
n
t
e
n
d
e
d

b
y

t
h
e

F
o
u
n
d
e
r
s
.


I
n

m
a
n
y

w
a
y
s

t
h
e
i
r

e
f
f
o
r
t
s

t
o

p
r
o
t
e
c
t

f
u
t
u
r
e

g
e
n
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s

w
i
t
h

t
h
e

C
o
n
s
t
i
t
u
t
i
o
n

f
r
o
m

t
h
i
s

d
a
n
g
e
r

h
a
s

f
a
i
l
e
d
.


S
k
e
p
t
i
c
s
,

a
t

t
h
e

t
i
m
e

t
h
e

C
o
n
s
t
i
t
u
t
i
o
n

w
a
s

w
r
i
t
t
e
n

i
n

1
7
8
7
,

w
a
r
n
e
d

u
s

o
f

t
o
d
a
y

s

p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e

o
u
t
c
o
m
e
.


T
h
e

i
n
s
i
d
i
o
u
s

n
a
t
u
r
e

o
f

t
h
e

e
r
o
s
i
o
n

o
f

o
u
r

l
i
b
e
r
t
i
e
s

a
n
d

t
h
e

r
e
a
s
s
u
r
a
n
c
e

o
u
r

g
r
e
a
t

a
b
u
n
d
a
n
c
e

g
a
v
e

u
s
,

a
l
l
o
w
e
d

t
h
e

p
r
o
c
e
s
s

t
o

e
v
o
l
v
e

i
n
t
o

t
h
e

d
a
n
g
e
r
o
u
s

p
e
r
i
o
d

i
n

w
h
i
c
h

w
e

n
o
w

l
i
v
e
.
D
e
p
e
n
d
e
n
c
y

o
n

G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t

L
a
r
g
e
s
s
e
T
o
d
a
y

w
e

f
a
c
e

a

d
e
p
e
n
d
e
n
c
y

o
n

g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t

l
a
r
g
e
s
s
e

f
o
r

a
l
m
o
s
t

e
v
e
r
y

n
e
e
d
.


O
u
r

l
i
b
e
r
t
i
e
s

a
r
e

r
e
s
t
r
i
c
t
e
d

a
n
d

g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t

o
p
e
r
a
t
e
s

o
u
t
s
i
d
e

t
h
e

r
u
l
e

o
f

l
a
w
,

p
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
n
g

a
n
d

r
e
w
a
r
d
i
n
g

t
h
o
s
e

w
h
o

b
u
y

o
r

c
o
e
r
c
e

g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t

i
n
t
o

s
a
t
i
s
f
y
i
n
g

t
h
e
i
r

d
e
m
a
n
d
s
.

H
e
r
e

a
r
e

a

f
e
w

e
x
a
m
p
l
e
s
:
U
n
d
e
c
l
a
r
e
d

w
a
r
s

a
r
e

c
o
m
m
o
n
p
l
a
c
e
.

W
e
l
f
a
r
e

f
o
r

t
h
e

r
i
c
h

a
n
d

p
o
o
r

i
s

c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d

a
n

e
n
t
i
t
l
e
m
e
n
t
.

T
h
e

e
c
o
n
o
m
y

i
s

o
v
e
r
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
e
d
,

o
v
e
r
t
a
x
e
d

a
n
d

g
r
o
s
s
l
y

d
i
s
t
o
r
t
e
d

b
y

a

d
e
e
p
l
y

a
w
e
d

m
o
n
e
t
a
r
y

s
y
s
t
e
m
.

D
e
b
t

i
s

g
r
o
w
i
n
g

e
x
p
o
n
e
n
t
i
a
l
l
y
.

T
h
e

P
a
t
r
i
o
t

A
c
t

a
n
d

F
I
S
A

l
e
g
i
s
l
a
t
i
o
n

p
a
s
s
e
d

w
i
t
h
o
u
t

m
u
c
h

d
e
b
a
t
e

h
a
v
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
e
d

i
n

a

s
t
e
a
d
y

e
r
o
s
i
o
n

o
f

o
u
r

4
t
h

A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t

r
i
g
h
t
s
.

T
r
a
g
i
c
a
l
l
y

o
u
r

g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t

e
n
g
a
g
e
s

i
n

p
r
e
e
m
p
t
i
v
e

w
a
r
,

o
t
h
e
r
w
i
s
e

k
n
o
w
n

a
s

a
g
g
r
e
s
s
i
o
n
,

w
i
t
h

n
o

c
o
m
p
l
a
i
n
t
s

f
r
o
m

t
h
e

A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n

p
e
o
p
l
e
.

T
h
e

d
r
o
n
e

w
a
r
f
a
r
e

w
e

a
r
e

p
u
r
s
u
i
n
g

w
o
r
l
d
w
i
d
e

i
s

d
e
s
t
i
n
e
d

t
o

e
n
d

b
a
d
l
y

f
o
r

u
s

a
s

t
h
e

h
a
t
r
e
d

b
u
i
l
d
s

f
o
r

i
n
n
o
c
e
n
t

l
i
v
e
s

l
o
s
t

a
n
d

t
h
e

i
n
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l

l
a
w
s

a
u
n
t
e
d
.

O
n
c
e

w
e

a
r
e

n
a
n
c
i
a
l
l
y

w
e
a
k
e
n
e
d

a
n
d

m
i
l
i
t
a
r
i
l
y

c
h
a
l
l
e
n
g
e
d
,

t
h
e
r
e

w
i
l
l

b
e

a

l
o
t

r
e
s
e
n
t
m
e
n
t

t
h
r
o
w
n

o
u
r

w
a
y
.

I
t

s

n
o
w

t
h
e

l
a
w

o
f

t
h
e

l
a
n
d

t
h
a
t

t
h
e

m
i
l
i
t
a
r
y

c
a
n

a
r
r
e
s
t

A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n

c
i
t
i
z
e
n
s
,

h
o
l
d

t
h
e
m

i
n
d
e

n
i
t
e
l
y
,

w
i
t
h
o
u
t

c
h
a
r
g
e
s

o
r

a

t
r
i
a
l
.

R
a
m
p
a
n
t

h
o
s
t
i
l
i
t
y

t
o
w
a
r
d

f
r
e
e

t
r
a
d
e

i
s

s
u
p
p
o
r
t
e
d

b
y

a

l
a
r
g
e

n
u
m
b
e
r

i
n

W
a
s
h
i
n
g
t
o
n
.

S
u
p
p
o
r
t
e
r
s

o
f

s
a
n
c
t
i
o
n
s
,

c
u
r
r
e
n
c
y

m
a
n
i
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n

a
n
d

W
T
O

t
r
a
d
e

r
e
t
a
l
i
a
t
i
o
n
,

c
a
l
l

t
h
e

t
r
u
e

f
r
e
e

t
r
a
d
e
r
s

i
s
o
l
a
t
i
o
n
i
s
t
s
.

S
a
n
c
t
i
o
n
s

a
r
e

u
s
e
d

t
o

p
u
n
i
s
h

c
o
u
n
t
r
i
e
s

t
h
a
t

d
o
n

t

f
o
l
l
o
w

o
u
r

o
r
d
e
r
s
.

B
a
i
l
o
u
t
s

a
n
d

g
u
a
r
a
n
t
e
e
s

f
o
r

a
l
l

k
i
n
d
s

o
f

m
i
s
b
e
h
a
v
i
o
r

a
r
e

r
o
u
t
i
n
e
.

C
e
n
t
r
a
l

e
c
o
n
o
m
i
c

p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g

t
h
r
o
u
g
h

m
o
n
e
t
a
r
y

p
o
l
i
c
y
,

r
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s

a
n
d

l
e
g
i
s
l
a
t
i
v
e

m
a
n
d
a
t
e
s

h
a
s

b
e
e
n

a
n

a
c
c
e
p
t
a
b
l
e

p
o
l
i
c
y
.


Q
u
e
s
t
i
o
n
s
E
x
c
e
s
s
i
v
e

g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t

h
a
s

c
r
e
a
t
e
d

s
u
c
h

a

m
e
s
s

i
t

p
r
o
m
p
t
s

m
a
n
y

q
u
e
s
t
i
o
n
s
:
W
h
y

a
r
e

s
i
c
k

p
e
o
p
l
e

w
h
o

u
s
e

m
e
d
i
c
a
l

m
a
r
i
j
u
a
n
a

p
u
t

i
n

p
r
i
s
o
n
?

W
h
y

d
o
e
s

t
h
e

f
e
d
e
r
a
l

g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t

r
e
s
t
r
i
c
t

t
h
e

d
r
i
n
k
i
n
g

o
f

r
a
w

m
i
l
k
?

W
h
y

c
a
n

t

A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n
s

m
a
n
u
f
a
c
t
u
r
e
r

r
o
p
e

a
n
d

o
t
h
e
r

p
r
o
d
u
c
t
s

f
r
o
m

h
e
m
p
?

W
h
y

a
r
e

A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n
s

n
o
t

a
l
l
o
w
e
d

t
o

u
s
e

g
o
l
d

a
n
d

s
i
l
v
e
r

a
s

l
e
g
a
l

t
e
n
d
e
r

A
r
e
n

t

t
h
e
y

t
h
e

s
a
m
e
?

W
h
y

d
o
n

t

m
o
r
e

d
e
f
e
n
d

b
o
t
h

e
c
o
n
o
m
i
c

l
i
b
e
r
t
y

a
n
d

p
e
r
s
o
n
a
l

l
i
b
e
r
t
y
?

W
h
y

a
r
e

t
h
e
r
e

n
o
t

m
o
r
e

i
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
s

w
h
o

s
e
e
k

t
o

i
n
t
e
l
l
e
c
t
u
a
l
l
y

i
n

u
e
n
c
e

o
t
h
e
r
s

t
o

b
r
i
n
g

a
b
o
u
t

p
o
s
i
t
i
v
e

c
h
a
n
g
e
s

t
h
a
n

t
h
o
s
e

w
h
o

s
e
e
k

p
o
w
e
r

t
o

f
o
r
c
e

o
t
h
e
r
s

t
o

o
b
e
y

t
h
e
i
r

c
o
m
m
a
n
d
s
?

W
h
y

d
o
e
s

t
h
e

u
s
e

o
f

r
e
l
i
g
i
o
n

t
o

s
u
p
p
o
r
t

a

s
o
c
i
a
l

g
o
s
p
e
l

a
n
d

p
r
e
e
m
p
t
i
v
e

w
a
r
s
,

b
o
t
h

o
f

w
h
i
c
h

r
e
q
u
i
r
e
s

a
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
a
r
i
a
n
s

t
o

u
s
e

v
i
o
l
e
n
c
e
,

o
r

t
h
e

t
h
r
e
a
t

o
f

v
i
o
l
e
n
c
e
,

g
o

u
n
c
h
a
l
l
e
n
g
e
d
?

A
g
g
r
e
s
s
i
o
n

a
n
d

f
o
r
c
e
d

r
e
d
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n

o
f

w
e
a
l
t
h

h
a
s

n
o
t
h
i
n
g

t
o

d
o

w
i
t
h

t
h
e

t
e
a
c
h
i
n
g
s

o
f

t
h
e

w
o
r
l
d

g
r
e
a
t

r
e
l
i
g
i
o
n
s
.

W
h
y

d
o

w
e

a
l
l
o
w

t
h
e

g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t

a
n
d

t
h
e

F
e
d
e
r
a
l

R
e
s
e
r
v
e

t
o

d
i
s
s
e
m
i
n
a
t
e

f
a
l
s
e

i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n

d
e
a
l
i
n
g

w
i
t
h

b
o
t
h

e
c
o
n
o
m
i
c

a
n
d

f
o
r
e
i
g
n

p
o
l
i
c
y
?

W
h
y

i
s

d
e
m
o
c
r
a
c
y

h
e
l
d

i
n

s
u
c
h

h
i
g
h

e
s
t
e
e
m

w
h
e
n

i
t

s

t
h
e

e
n
e
m
y

o
f

t
h
e

m
i
n
o
r
i
t
y

a
n
d

m
a
k
e
s

a
l
l

r
i
g
h
t
s

r
e
l
a
t
i
v
e

t
o

t
h
e

d
i
c
t
a
t
e
s

o
f

t
h
e

m
a
j
o
r
i
t
y
?

W
h
y

s
h
o
u
l
d

a
n
y
o
n
e

b
e

s
u
r
p
r
i
s
e
d

t
h
a
t

C
o
n
g
r
e
s
s

h
a
s

n
o

c
r
e
d
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
,

s
i
n
c
e

t
h
e
r
e

s

s
u
c
h

a

d
i
s
c
o
n
n
e
c
t

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

w
h
a
t

p
o
l
i
t
i
c
i
a
n
s

s
a
y

a
n
d

w
h
a
t

t
h
e
y

d
o
?

I
s

t
h
e
r
e

a
n
y

e
x
p
l
a
n
a
t
i
o
n

f
o
r

a
l
l

t
h
e

d
e
c
e
p
t
i
o
n
,

t
h
e

u
n
h
a
p
p
i
n
e
s
s
,

t
h
e

f
e
a
r

o
f

t
h
e

f
u
t
u
r
e
,

t
h
e

l
o
s
s

o
f

c
o
n

d
e
n
c
e

i
n

o
u
r

l
e
a
d
e
r
s
,

t
h
e

d
i
s
t
r
u
s
t
,

t
h
e

a
n
g
e
r

a
n
d

f
r
u
s
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
?



Y
e
s

t
h
e
r
e

i
s
,

a
n
d

t
h
e
r
e

s

a

w
a
y

t
o

r
e
v
e
r
s
e

t
h
e
s
e

a
t
t
i
t
u
d
e
s
.


T
h
e

n
e
g
a
t
i
v
e

p
e
r
c
e
p
t
i
o
n
s

a
r
e

l
o
g
i
c
a
l

a
n
d

a

c
o
n
s
e
q
u
e
n
c
e

o
f

b
a
d

p
o
l
i
c
i
e
s

b
r
i
n
g
i
n
g

a
b
o
u
t

o
u
r

p
r
o
b
l
e
m
s
.

I
d
e
n
t
i

c
a
t
i
o
n

o
f

t
h
e

p
r
o
b
l
e
m
s

a
n
d

r
e
c
o
g
n
i
z
i
n
g

t
h
e

c
a
u
s
e

a
l
l
o
w

t
h
e

p
r
o
p
e
r

c
h
a
n
g
e
s

t
o

c
o
m
e

e
a
s
y
.

T
r
u
s
t

Y
o
u
r
s
e
l
f
,

N
o
t

t
h
e

G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
T
o
o

m
a
n
y

p
e
o
p
l
e

h
a
v
e

f
o
r

t
o
o

l
o
n
g

p
l
a
c
e
d

t
o
o

m
u
c
h

c
o
n

d
e
n
c
e

a
n
d

t
r
u
s
t

i
n

g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t

a
n
d

n
o
t

e
n
o
u
g
h

i
n

t
h
e
m
s
e
l
v
e
s
.


F
o
r
t
u
n
a
t
e
l
y
,

m
a
n
y

a
r
e

n
o
w

b
e
c
o
m
i
n
g

a
w
a
r
e

o
f

t
h
e

s
e
r
i
o
u
s
n
e
s
s

o
f

t
h
e

g
r
o
s
s

m
i
s
t
a
k
e
s

o
f

t
h
e

p
a
s
t

s
e
v
e
r
a
l

d
e
c
a
d
e
s
.


T
h
e

b
l
a
m
e

i
s

s
h
a
r
e
d

b
y

b
o
t
h

p
o
l
i
t
i
c
a
l

p
a
r
t
i
e
s
.


M
a
n
y

A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n
s

n
o
w

a
r
e

d
e
m
a
n
d
i
n
g

t
o

h
e
a
r

t
h
e

p
l
a
i
n

t
r
u
t
h

o
f

t
h
i
n
g
s

a
n
d

w
a
n
t

t
h
e

d
e
m
a
g
o
g
u
i
n
g

t
o

s
t
o
p
.


W
i
t
h
o
u
t

t
h
i
s

r
s
t

s
t
e
p
,

s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
s

a
r
e

i
m
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
.
S
e
e
k
i
n
g

t
h
e

t
r
u
t
h

a
n
d

n
d
i
n
g

t
h
e

a
n
s
w
e
r
s

i
n

l
i
b
e
r
t
y

a
n
d

s
e
l
f
-
r
e
l
i
a
n
c
e

p
r
o
m
o
t
e
s

t
h
e

o
p
t
i
m
i
s
m

n
e
c
e
s
s
a
r
y

f
o
r

r
e
s
t
o
r
i
n
g

p
r
o
s
p
e
r
i
t
y
.


T
h
e

t
a
s
k

i
s

n
o
t

t
h
a
t

d
i
f

c
u
l
t

i
f

p
o
l
i
t
i
c
s

d
o
e
s
n

t

g
e
t

i
n

t
h
e

w
a
y
.
W
e

h
a
v
e

a
l
l
o
w
e
d

o
u
r
s
e
l
v
e
s

t
o

g
e
t

i
n
t
o

s
u
c
h

a

m
e
s
s

f
o
r

v
a
r
i
o
u
s

r
e
a
s
o
n
s
.
P
o
l
i
t
i
c
i
a
n
s

d
e
c
e
i
v
e

t
h
e
m
s
e
l
v
e
s

a
s

t
o

h
o
w

w
e
a
l
t
h

i
s

p
r
o
d
u
c
e
d
.

E
x
c
e
s
s
i
v
e

c
o
n

d
e
n
c
e

i
s

p
l
a
c
e
d

i
n

t
h
e

j
u
d
g
m
e
n
t

o
f

p
o
l
i
t
i
c
i
a
n
s

a
n
d

b
u
r
e
a
u
c
r
a
t
s
.


T
h
i
s

r
e
p
l
a
c
e
s

t
h
e

c
o
n

d
e
n
c
e

i
n

a

f
r
e
e

s
o
c
i
e
t
y
.


T
o
o

m
a
n
y

i
n

h
i
g
h

p
l
a
c
e
s

o
f

a
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y

b
e
c
a
m
e

c
o
n
v
i
n
c
e
d

t
h
a
t

o
n
l
y

t
h
e
y
,



a
r
m
e
d

w
i
t
h

a
r
b
i
t
r
a
r
y

g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t

p
o
w
e
r
,

c
a
n

b
r
i
n
g

a
b
o
u
t

f
a
i
r
n
e
s
s
,

w
h
i
l
e

f
a
c
i
l
i
t
a
t
i
n
g

w
e
a
l
t
h

p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
.


T
h
i
s

a
l
w
a
y
s

p
r
o
v
e
s

t
o

b
e

a

u
t
o
p
i
a
n

d
r
e
a
m

a
n
d

d
e
s
t
r
o
y
s

w
e
a
l
t
h

a
n
d

l
i
b
e
r
t
y
.


I
t

i
m
p
o
v
e
r
i
s
h
e
s

t
h
e

p
e
o
p
l
e

a
n
d

r
e
w
a
r
d
s

t
h
e

s
p
e
c
i
a
l

i
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
s

w
h
o

e
n
d

u
p

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
l
i
n
g

b
o
t
h

p
o
l
i
t
i
c
a
l

p
a
r
t
i
e
s
.
I
t

s

n
o

s
u
r
p
r
i
s
e

t
h
e
n

t
h
a
t

m
u
c
h

o
f

w
h
a
t

g
o
e
s

o
n

i
n

W
a
s
h
i
n
g
t
o
n

i
s

d
r
i
v
e
n

b
y

a
g
g
r
e
s
s
i
v
e

p
a
r
t
i
s
a
n
s
h
i
p

a
n
d

p
o
w
e
r

s
e
e
k
i
n
g
,

w
i
t
h

p
h
i
l
o
s
o
p
h
i
c

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
s

b
e
i
n
g

m
i
n
o
r
.
E
c
o
n
o
m
i
c

I
g
n
o
r
a
n
c
e
E
c
o
n
o
m
i
c

i
g
n
o
r
a
n
c
e

i
s

c
o
m
m
o
n
p
l
a
c
e
.


K
e
y
n
e
s
i
a
n
i
s
m

c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
s

t
o

t
h
r
i
v
e
,

a
l
t
h
o
u
g
h

t
o
d
a
y

i
t

i
s

f
a
c
i
n
g

h
e
a
l
t
h
y

a
n
d

e
n
t
h
u
s
i
a
s
t
i
c

r
e
b
u
t
t
a
l
s
.

B
e
l
i
e
v
e
r
s

i
n

m
i
l
i
t
a
r
y

K
e
y
n
e
s
i
a
n
i
s
m

a
n
d

d
o
m
e
s
t
i
c

K
e
y
n
e
s
i
a
n
i
s
m

c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e

t
o

d
e
s
p
e
r
a
t
e
l
y

p
r
o
m
o
t
e

t
h
e
i
r

f
a
i
l
e
d

p
o
l
i
c
i
e
s
,

a
s

t
h
e

e
c
o
n
o
m
y

l
a
n
g
u
i
s
h
e
s

i
n

a

d
e
e
p

s
l
u
m
b
e
r
.
S
u
p
p
o
r
t
e
r
s

o
f

a
l
l

g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t

e
d
i
c
t
s

u
s
e

h
u
m
a
n
i
t
a
r
i
a
n

a
r
g
u
m
e
n
t
s

t
o

j
u
s
t
i
f
y

t
h
e
m
.
H
u
m
a
n
i
t
a
r
i
a
n

a
r
g
u
m
e
n
t
s

a
r
e

a
l
w
a
y
s

u
s
e
d

t
o

j
u
s
t
i
f
y

g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t

m
a
n
d
a
t
e
s

r
e
l
a
t
e
d

t
o

t
h
e

e
c
o
n
o
m
y
,

m
o
n
e
t
a
r
y

p
o
l
i
c
y
,

f
o
r
e
i
g
n

p
o
l
i
c
y
,

a
n
d

p
e
r
s
o
n
a
l

l
i
b
e
r
t
y
.


T
h
i
s

i
s

o
n

p
u
r
p
o
s
e

t
o

m
a
k
e

i
t

m
o
r
e

d
i
f

c
u
l
t

t
o

c
h
a
l
l
e
n
g
e
.


B
u
t
,

i
n
i
t
i
a
t
i
n
g

v
i
o
l
e
n
c
e

f
o
r

h
u
m
a
n
i
t
a
r
i
a
n

r
e
a
s
o
n
s

i
s

s
t
i
l
l

C
O
N
T
I
N
U
E
D

O
N

P
G
.

2
9
C
O
N
T
I
N
U
E
D

O
N

P
G
.

2
9
C
O
N
T
I
N
U
E
D

O
N

C
E
N
T
E
R

P
O
S
T
E
R
7
IMPORTANT
CONTACTS
other:____________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
CIVIL DEFENCE:___________________________________________________________________________
emergency freequency:________________________________________
POLICE | FIRE | AMBULANCE
DIAL
911
we are always getting new survival items at infowarsshop.com so make sure to check regularly for books, movies, ashlights, etc.
household survival items
ADDRESS:___________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
documents
personal items
birth & marriage certificates
THE AQUA POD KIT
life straw
the pocket socket
thyrosafe
KA350 Voyager Mini
PHONE NUMBERS:____________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
getaway kit
check &replace food & water every
12 months
drivers licences & passports
insurance policies
family photos
towels, toothbrush, soap, & other
sanitary items
a change of clothes
food & water
OTHER SUPPLIES
other emergency items
BABIES & SMALL CHILDREN
drinking water:
{3 liters/day per person}
water for washing & cooking
non-perishable food {canned or
dried}
can opener
gas grill to cook on
waterproof matches
spare batteries
PARTICLE/DUST MASKS
am/fm radio & spare batteries
first aid kit and essential meds
toilet paper and garbage bags
for emergency toilet
PARTICLE/DUST MASKS
PET SUPPLIES
BLANKETS OR SLEEPING BAGS
WIND/SNOW/RAIN-PROOF CLOTHING
DURABLE FOOTWEAR
SUN PROTECTION {HATS/SUNSCREEN}
FOOD/FORMULA/& DRINK
DIAPERS & CHANGE OF CLOTHING
FAVORITE TOY/ACTIVITY
HEARING AIDS
GLASSES/BINOCULARS
MOBILITY AIDS
ASTHMA AND RESPIRATORY AIDS
PERSCRIBED MEDICATIONS
enough for 3
days or more
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
LAST CHECK
With the aftermath of hurricane Sandy resembling the
horrors of Katrina, the government once again has shown
us that they cant and wont help in times of crisis. We at
Infowars thought it would be useful to give you a list to
start with when disaster and chaos strike.
Directions: Fill this out, keep it on your fridge, and make
sure everyone in the household understands their role in
your familys plan when and if anything happens.
infowarsshop.com
1
3
4
5
6
8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Alex Jones 8-Day
Emergency Grab
and Go Pack
Alex Jones 16-Day
Patriot Food Pack
Crystal Quest
Shower Filter
2
INFOWARS.COM 36
So look, there are fifteen
million votes out there we
havent counted yet. What do
you want to do?
How long have the polls
been closed?
Lets see. Two hours.
The hell with it. Lets call
it a defeat for Prop 37.
Okay.
T
his isnt over.
Were not just looking at how many votes in
California are still uncounted. Were not just
guessing how itll turn out and making little
projections. Thats a suckers game.
Were looking at real symptoms of fraud, and fraud
has tentacles and arms. If you see one piece of fraud,
you keep digging for other pieces. You usually nd them.
Start with the incredibly early projections made by
media outlets on election night. Those projections
sank Prop 37.
When youre in the middle of a football game and the
outcome is still in doubt, if somebody suddenly posts
the nal score on the scoreboard, thats called a lie.
It isnt an estimate or a guess or a prediction. Its a lie.
There was once a day in American politics when news
networks would wait for conclusive election results.
They werent greedily bent on reporting projections
soon and sooner and soonest.
So lets get that projection-brainwashing out of our
heads, all right?
The whole business of making early and earlier pre-
dictions on election night is a sham. And it has the
effect of inducing people to tune out.
Okay, Jones won. Thats that. What percentage of
the votes have been counted? One half of one per-
cent? Zero percent? Gee, I guess these prediction
guys really know what theyre doing. They must have
some fabulous computer models, honey. Lets watch a
CSI rerun
Here is what happened on election night in California.
With many millions of votes still not counted, televi-
sion stations up and down the state sealed the fate of
Prop 37, by saying it had lost.
Many of those California votes are still uncounted.
Yesterday, by consulting four of the 57 county regis-
trars in the state, I found 1.6 million votes still unpro-
cessed. That was chicken feed.
An updated report, as of noon today, November 9,
posted at the California Secretary of States website,
indicates that, for all of California, a boggling 3.3 mil-
lion votes remain uncounted.
So who called the shots? Who made the early and
grossly premature projection on election night? Who told
all the media outlets that Prop 37 had been defeated?
I suspected it was Edison Media Research, an outt
that works for the National Election Pool (NEP). NEP
is a media consortium that supplies election-night
information to the press. This morning I spoke with a
representative of Edison, who told me they didnt make
the projection on Prop 37.
If true, that leaves Associated Press (AP) as the lead-
ing suspect. AP is part of the National Election Pool as
well. AP has awesome resources.
I spoke with Erin Madigan White, media relations
manager at AP. I asked her whether AP had made the
projections for Prop 37 to media outlets.
She emailed me the following tidbit. It was not quite
an answer to my question, but it was illuminating:
To clarify: AP does not make projections, but
bases our reporting on counting real votes from every
precinct. As our story notes specically, With all the
states precincts reporting, Proposition 37 failed 53.1
percent to 46.9 percent.
When someone gives you this kind of sleight-of-hand
maneuver, its called a clue. Lets start with this phrase:
With all the states precincts reporting. The precincts
were all reporting PARTIAL results. Even today, there
are 3.3 million votes in CA still to be counted.
This tells you that AP was lying. Thats right. Lets
call it what it was. They were lying about all pre-
cincts. It was an intentional con.
And what does the phrase bases our reporting on
counting real votes mean? It certainly means calling
the result of an election. Because thats exactly what
AP did with Prop 37, based on partial results, on Nov.8.
Thats a projection. They say they dont make projec-
tions, but they do. Thats another lie.
On election night, I believe AP must have been the
entity who passed voting information on Prop 37 to
media outlets throughout California.
AP will not speak about their business relationships
with media outlets. They will not name those outlets.
They claim client condentiality on this matter.
Why?
I believe the answer is obvious. AP, the giant wire
service, doesnt want people to know how much
inuence they have on what media outlets report. AP
doesnt want the public to know how much of the news,
everywhere, comes from AP. And media outlets dont
want their own customers to know how much of what
they report is really at-out or recycled AP material.
This powerful AP inuence certainly would extend
to election-night reporting.
Knowing how the National Election Pool basically
works, I see no other entity who could have played
that information-provider role for all the networks, TV
stations, radio stations, websites, and newspapers in
Californiaand in the country, on this past election
night, with respect to Prop 37.
With millions of votes outstanding and uncounted, I
conclude it was AP who provided the data to the net-
works, who then made the early calls against Prop 37
and sank it.
After posting an original article, which exposed
the big lie about Prop 37 early projections, I received
many emails.
Most of the emailers stated they were glad to get the
information. A few people questioned my report. They
said, Well, a hundred percent of voting precincts have
already sent their vote-counts to the Secretary of State
of California.
Wrong. A hundred percent of precincts have sent
PARTIAL vote-counts to the Secretary of State.
A few people said, Well, the counties in California,
who are in charge of counting all votes in their dis-
tricts, have several weeks to wrap up the count. That
happens in every election. Nothing new there.
I know that. My attack is leveled at the early call
against Prop 37 given to the media, on election night,
when so many votes were still uncounted, when there
was no way to know the nal outcome.
A few people said, Well, of the votes that remain to
be counted in California, about two-thirds would have
to go YES ON 37 to swing 37 over into victory. That
wont happen.
Lets leave that question to the actual vote-count. But
written by JON RAPPOPORT
PRISONPLANET.COM 37
INFOWARS.COM
were not only talking about the odds
of getting a victory through counting
the rest of the votes. With these hor-
rendous early projections, were look-
ing at a symptom of huge fraud here.
The smoke in front of the re:
Who can guarantee that the votes
already tallied in California were done
faithfully and honestly? Who can
guarantee that the voting machines
were accurately recording votes?
Given APs replies to me, and their
policy of secrecy about their media
clients, who wants to trust that news
giant?
Concerning machine vote-fraud,
wake up and smell the coffee. See Bev
Harris work at blackboxvoting.org
and also Victoria Colliers important
articles on this subject. Read up on
the 2000 Bush-Gore asco and the
2004 Bush-Kerry voting nightmare
(especially in Ohio).
Many people have emailed me to
ask, What can we do now? First of
all, the YES ON 37 people have to for-
get about their concession of defeat.
They need to get busy and look
into vote fraud.
They have to come back to the play-
ing eld.
To return to the football analogy, if youre in the middle of
the game and somebody suddenly posts the nal score on the
scoreboard, do you hang your head and walk off and accept
the loss? Is that what you do?
Do you bow down to the system, because youre afraid that,
if you object, people will label you sour grapes and crazy?
Or do you become more relentless?
YES ON 37 needs to demand to look at the voting machines,
the software used in the vote-count. YES ON 37 needs to
probe, with all they have, into what AP did on election night.
And thats just for starters. Bring on the lawyers. Make some
real waves. Shake people up.
Think about this as well. Why was Prop 37 launched in
California? Why not Arkansas or Louisiana?
Because its well-known that California, historically and
presently, is the core of the natural health movement in
America. CA is where it really took hold and spread. CA is
where everybody and his brother want gluten-free bicycles
and organic streetlamps and raw unpas-
teurized sunglasses and GMO-free
underwear.
The sentiment for Prop 37 was over-
whelming a couple of months ago. Then,
boom. Everything went the other way. It
wasnt just the NO ON 37 ads. It wasnt
just the massive spending by the NO ON
37 forces.
The real specter of vote fraud is here,
whether you like it or not.
If, indeed, AP made the early reports
or projections or suggestions or advices
of defeat for 37 to media outlets, lets see
their data and their models of interpre-
tation. Did they do exit polls? Ive never
heard of AP conducting exit polls.
If as AP claims, they dont do projec-
tions, are we supposed to believe they
sent out nothing more than raw-vote
counts to a few thousand media outlets
in California, and each and every one
of those outlets decided, on their own,
through their own analysis, that Prop
37 was a lost cause early on election
night?
Dont believe that for a second. These
local TV stations and newspapers arent
independent enough to do that kind of
projecting on their own. They were tak-
ing advice from somewhere. They were
all falling into line. They were merely mouthpieces for some-
ones projection.
This should trouble you. It should trouble you greatly. Unless
youre so enamored of projections and computer modeling and
data interpretation and honest and honorable vote machines
that youre sure everything is just ne and dandy.
Early dismissive projections on election night are part and
parcel of the Big Con. They are wands waved that put people
to sleep and elections to bed.
So, no, Virginia. No. Everything is not okay.
The author of an explosive collection, THE MATRIX
REVEALED, Jon was a candidate for a U.S. Congressional
seat in the 29th District of California. Nominated for a
Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter
for 30 years and has delivered lectures and seminars to
audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free
emails at www.nomorefakenews.com and read more articles
at http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com
PRISONPLANET.COM
T
H
E

P
L
A
Y
L
I
S
T
INFOWARS.COM
O
n Oct. 24, NBC news put out an article attempt-
ing to refute a recent study published in the
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition which
found that drinking as little as one diet soda
sweetened with Aspartame per day could cause an
increased risk of leukemia and lymphoma in adults.
Claiming the study was weak science, NBC news
failed to mention the fact that this latest research is the
most thorough on aspartame to date, involving more
than 2 million years of human life data spanning 22
years from more than 77,000 women and 48,000 men.
The NBC story also claims Few reporters read that
journal, in reference to American Journal of Clinical
Nutrition, even though it was selected by the Special
Libraries Association as one of the top 100 most
inuential journals in Biology and Medicine in the
last 100 years.
Aspartame (otherwise known by its brand names
NutraSweet and Equal or alternate monicker
Acesulfame Potassium) is one of the most widely used
articial sweeteners on the market today. Found in
thousands of foods and beverages including chewing
gum, candies, diet soft drinks, desserts, yogurt, condi-
ments and even vitamins and pharmaceuticals, aspar-
tame is not limited only to
sugar-free diet products. It
is virtually impossible to nd
commercially available gum
that does not contain aspar-
tame these days.
The average grocery store
is rife with aspartame-lled
products, so it would likely
surprise the average con-
sumer to nd that it took
the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) more
than 20 years to approve
aspartames use.
What is aspartame exactly,
and if its so healthy and safe,
why did it take so long for
the FDA to approve it?
Aspartame is the excre-
ment of genetically mod-
ied E. coli bacteria. It is
comprised of 40 percent
aspartic acid, 50 percent
phenylalanine and 10 per-
cent methanol. Aspartic acid
acts as a neurotransmitter,
and too much can actually
THE DANGERS OF
ASPARTAME
over-excite the cells (known as an excitotoxin), thus
stimulating them to death. Keep in mind, the blood
brain barrier cannot prevent this in many people, as it
does not fully protect all areas of the brain, especially in
someone already suffering from other chronic diseases
and disorders, and the barrier is not fully developed in
children. While phenylalanine is an amino acid already
present in the brain, excess levels can cause serotonin
to decrease over time, which can lead to chemical
imbalances that cause depression and other mood
and emotional disorders. Methanol is an industrial
solvent, is used as fuel and antifreeze, and is a main
ingredient in many paints and varnish removers. The
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) warns
that methanol ingestion may result in neurological
damage (specically permanent motor dysfunction)
PUBLICATION TITLE
American Journal of
Clinical Nutrition
Consumption of articial sweetener and sugar-containing soda and risk of
lymphoma and leukemia in men and women
Appetite
Saccharin and aspartame, compared with sucrose, induce greater weight gain in
adult Wistar rats, at similar total caloric intake levels
Contact Dermatitis
Systemic allergic dermatitis presumably caused by formaldehyde derived from
aspartame
Drug and Chemical
Toxicology
Long-term consumption of aspartame and brain antioxidant defense status
Journal of Biosciences
Effect of chronic exposure to aspartame on oxidative stress in the brain of
albino rats
Neurotoxicity
Research
Effect of aspartame on oxidative stress and monoamine neurotransmitter levels
in lipopolysaccharide-treated mice
Nutrition and
Metabolism
Interactive effects of neonatal exposure to monosodium glutamate and
aspartame on glucose homeostasis
PLOS One
Gender dimorphism in aspartame-induced impairment of spatial cognition and
insulin sensitivity
written by MELISSA MELTON
FIGURE 1
MILLIONS OF PEOPLE
CONSUME ASPARTAME
EVERY SINGLE DAY, IT WAS
NEVER TESTED ON HUMANS
PRIOR TO ITS APPROVAL.
and visual disturbances leading to blurred or dimmed
vision and eventually blindness.
While Searle Pharmaceuticals attempted to attain
approval for aspartame in the late 1970s, due to multiple
studies provided on the negative effects of the chemical
in lab animals including the fact that it actually ate
holes in their brains the FDA set up a public board of
inquiry to investigate the matter in 1980. Based on the
ndings, the board found that aspartame might cause
cancer and concluded the sweetener could not be put
on the market until further testing was completed. It
INFOWARS SPECIAL REPORT:
40
PRISONPLANET.COM
Dr. Mercola notes that aspartame actually accounts
for over 75 percent of adverse food additive reactions
reported to the FDA, including:
Headaches/migraines, dizziness, seizures, nausea,
numbness, muscle spasms, weight gain, rashes, depres-
sion, fatigue, irritability, tachycardia, insomnia, vision
problems, hearing loss, heart palpitations, breathing
difculties, anxiety attacks, slurred speech, loss of
taste, tinnitus, vertigo, memory loss, and joint pain.
In fact, the EPA even lists aspartame as a chemical
with substantial evidence of developmental neurotox-
icity on its database of developmental neurotoxicants.
If You Like Aspartame, Youll Love Neotame
In the late-1990s, Monsanto geared up to unleash a
new sweetener on the masses: neotame.
Scientists based this new articial sweetener on
aspartame, but after enhancing the dipeptide
base, they created a chemical 40 times sweeter than
aspartame. Neotame is everything aspartame is, plus
3-dimethylbutyl. A member of the sec-Hexyl acetate
family, 3-dimethylbutyl is listed by the EPA and the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) as a
hazardous chemical. The CDC warns one should seek
immediate medical attention if it is swallowed, as it
targets the central nervous and respiratory systems.
Dr. H. J. Roberts, M.D., who presented material to
show Aspartame Disease is a global epidemic at the
First International Conference on Emerging Diseases,
has testied that neotame was approved without
any long-term independent studies purely for prot
because aspartames patent expired. Despite the fact
that all of the studies on neotame were short-term and
entirely Monsanto- or corporate-interest funded, the
FDA approved it in 2002 anyway.
DR. MERCOLA NOTES THAT
ASPARTAME ACTUALLY
ACCOUNTS FOR OVER 75
PERCENT OF ADVERSE FOOD
ADDITIVE REACTIONS
got pushed through anyway after Ronald Reagan red
the FDA commissioner, replacing him with someone
who would rubber stamp aspartame for his friend and
Searle CEO Donald Rumsfeld. Searle went on to
make billions, Monsanto purchased Searle in 1985, and
Rumsfeld was later named U.S. Secretary of Defense.
Although millions of people consume aspartame
every single day, it was never even tested on humans
prior to its approval.
The truth is many scientic studies have empirically
shown the detrimental effects of aspartame over the
years. While NBC can attempt to discount this latest
study linking aspartame to cancer, can the mainstream
media really spin the hundreds of studies that have
proven aspartame is toxic and harmful to our health?
The table below gives a smattering of aspartame stud-
ies published in scientic and medical journals listed
on the National Institutes of Health website just this
past year: see gure 1.
Moreover, why would the media continue to shill
for an articial sweetener? As best-selling author and
osteopathic physician Dr. Joseph Mercola points out:
Can you imagine the liability the food and beverage
industries, not to mention virtually every public health
agency in the U.S., would face were there convincing
evidence that aspartame is carcinogenic? They simply
cannot afford such evidence to be accepted.
The mainstream media isnt the only information
source continually refuting the dangers of aspartame.
The Aspartame Information Center at Aspartame.
org claims that scientic studies on everything from
aspartame-induced brain tumors to seizures to weight
gain are merely myths. It shouldnt surprise many to
nd that Aspartame.org and its information center are
run by the Calorie Control Council, an international
association they admit represents manufacturers and
suppliers of low- and reduced-calorie foods.
In a nation where genetically modied food label-
ing initiatives fail simply because biotech companies
are willing to spend millions waging disinformation
campaigns to defeat them, what does safe food even
mean anymore? The very companies that prot off
genetically modied food are the ones that pay for the
scientic studies to sell their product to the public.
Guess it all depends who you ask.
Monsanto should not have to vouchsafe the safety
of biotech food. Our interest is in selling as much of it
as possible. Assuring its safety is the FDAs job. Phil
Angell, Monsantos director of corporate communica-
tions, quoted in The New York Times, Oct. 25, 1998.
Melissa Melton is a reporter for the Infowars Nightly
News and a frequent contributing writer on www.
infowars.com. She holds a masters degree in ciminol-
ogy and she is a passionate advocate for liberty and
bringing the New World Order to justice.
W
H
A
T
S

R
E
A
L
L
Y

I
N

V
A
C
C
I
N
E
S
?
THIMEROSAL
causes severe,
permanent
nervous sys -
tem damage; a
methyl mercury
compound highly
toxic to the brain
and kidneys
FORMALDEHYDE
used to preserve
cadavers that are
highly toxic to
the nervous
system, causing
blindness, brain
damage,seizures
as well as other
cancers
MONOSODIUM GLU-
TAMATE (MSG) causes
brain neurons to
overexcite themselves
to death, causes
migraine headaches
and endocrine system
damage
ABORTED FETAL CELLS
WI-38, PER C6 and MRC-5,
two cell lines that origi-
nate from aborted babies
are used to produce many
U.S.-made vaccines such
as Chickenpox, Measles,
Mumps, Rubella, Shingles
and Hepatitis A.
PRISONPLANET.COM
A
recently released Bureau of Justice Statistics report demonstrates the
unprecedented growth of local law enforcement in the United States. The
survey was conducted with agencies participating in the 2008 Census of
State and Local Law Enforcement Agencies, including local police depart-
ments, sheriffs ofces and agencies in 50 states. The results were released by the
Justice Department in November.
A RESPONSE TO CRIME DOES NOT FACTOR INTO THE EQUATION.
STATISTICS REVEAL THAT LAW ENFORCEMENT GREW ITS
RANKS DESPITE A SIGNIFICANT DECLINE IN CRIME. ACCORDING
TO FBI NUMBERS, MURDER, RAPE AND ROBBERY WENT DOWN
IN THE UNITED STATES IN 2011 FOR A FIFTH CONSECUTIVE YEAR.
COMPARED WITH 2010, THE LATEST FIGURES SHOW VIOLENT
CRIME DOWN 3.8 PERCENT OVERALL AND PROPERTY CRIME
REDUCED BY 0.5 PERCENT. JUSTICE DEPARTMENT FIGURES
ALSO SHOW THE CRIME-RATE FELL TO AN ALL-TIME LOW IN 2011.
The falling crime rate amid the worst economic downturn since the Great
Depression has puzzled some criminologists, since crime historically spikes during
hard times, the Christian Science Monitor reported in June.
MORE COPS, MORE MILITARIZED
Despite the decline in crime, police departments around the country are not only expe-
riencing increased growth but are rapidly transforming into paramilitary organizations,
a phenomenon that is encouraged and often funded by the federal government. Forbes
reported last year that the Department of Homeland Security granted local cops a stag-
gering $3 billion that was spent on necessary tools like BearCats and other armored
personnel vehicles, tools more appropriate for combat duty than domestic police duties.
In 2011, 17,000 plus federal, state and local agencies accepted more than $2.6
billion in donated military equipment, much of it used in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The combat equipment and lavish funding provided by the federal government
are intended for all-inclusive counter-narcotics and counter-terrorism enforcement
600 564
800
700
900
1990
K
750
K
500
1
Mil.
92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12
1.6% annual growth rate
(FULL-TIME COPS)
ACCORDING TO THE REPORT,
BETWEEN 1992 AND 2008 THE
CUMULATIVE NUMBER OF FULL-
TIME POLICE PERSONNEL GREW BY
25 PERCENT. IN 2008 THERE WERE
705,000 FULL-TIME SWORN OFFI-
CERS EMPLOYED IN THE UNITED
STATES. THE NUMBER WAS 564,000
IN 1992. THIS REPRESENTS AN
ANNUAL GROWTH RATE OF 1.6 PER-
CENT, WHICH EXCEEDS THE 1.2 PER-
CENT POPULATION GROWTH RATE
IN THE UNITED STATES.
activities, Forbes notes.
A study conducted by the Center for Investigative Reporting examined open spend-
ing records in 41 states. The examination found local law enforcement spending
money on large stockpiles of weapons and military protective equipment worthy of
a defense contractors sales catalog, The Daily Beast wrote in December 2011.
The buying spree has transformed local police departments into small, army-like
forces, and put intimidating equipment into the hands of civilian ofcers. And that is
raising questions about whether the strategy has gone too far, creating a culture and
capability that jeopardizes public safety and civil rights while creating an expensive
false sense of security.
PENTAGON PUSH TO MILITARIZE POLICE
In 1970, according to Jeremy Kuzmarov writing for the LA Progressive, the
Pentagon produced a paper documenting how the Ofce of Public Safety in South
Vietnam was responsible for stimulating U.S. industry to develop new and improved
police equipment and creating a formidable police-industrial complex.
written by KURT NIMMO
43
The 1980s and 1990s have seen marked changes
in the number of state and local paramilitary units,
in their mission and deployment, and in their tactical
armament, a report issued by the CATO Institute in
1999 notes. At that time, nearly 90 percent of the
police departments surveyed in cities with populations
over 50,000 had paramilitary units, as did 70 percent
of the departments surveyed in communities with pop-
ulations under 50,000.
Congress has encouraged the U.S. military to supply
intelligence, equipment, and training to civilian police,
CATO continues. That encouragement has spawned a
culture of paramilitarism in American police depart-
ments. By virtue of their training and specialized arma-
ment, state and local police ofcers are adopting the
tactics and mindset of their military mentors.
According to the California Emergency Management
Agency, the National Defense Authorization Act
authorizes the Secretary of Defense to transfer excess
Department of Defense personal property to federal,
state and local law enforcement agencies with special
emphasis given to counter drug and counter terrorism.
Reagans War on Drugs in the mid-1980s set the stage
for the destruction of Posse Comitatus, the 1878 law
instituted at the end of Reconstruction following the
Civil War that limited the powers of local governments
and law enforcement agencies in the use of federal
military personnel. Congress further eroded Posse
Comitatus and began rapidly militarizing local law
enforcement in 1987 when it established an adminis-
trative apparatus to facilitate cooperation and collabo-
ration between the mi\litary and police.
President Bush augmented this growth when he
created six regional task forces in 1989 within the
Department of Defense charged with coordinating
anti-drug efforts by the military and civilian police
departments around the country. By the early 1990s,
police had at their disposal high-tech military hard-
ware previously reserved for use during wartime.
THE ROLE OF MILITARIZED COPS IN
SUPPRESSING DOMESTIC DISSENT
The philosophy and tactics evolving from Reagans
War on Drugs are also employed by the state to counter
political activity it considers a threat.
The continuity in pattern is evident today, with many
police ofcers still coming from military backgrounds,
being trained along paramilitary lines in the use of
advanced military technologies and developing what
former Seattle police chief Norm Stamper character-
ized as a SWAT mentality, where all demonstrators are
treated as enemies of the state, Kuzmarov explains.
The massive presence of militarized police at the pres-
idential conventions earlier this year exposes the real
purpose behind the militarization and unprecedented
growth of domestic law enforcement despite falling
crime rates: the United States is a highly sophisticated
and often increasingly brutal police state. The primary
enemy is not al-Qaeda, white supremacists, anarchists,
or even violent drug gangs the enemy is a far more
dangerous threat to the state: the American people,
in particular Americans motivated to seek political
change and overturn the status quo of the ruling elite
outside the rigged parameters it has established for
political activity.
As Occupy activists last year and demonstrators at
the establishment political conventions this year dis-
covered, militarized cops and riot police now routinely
full
pur-
s
08
Cumulative p of
time sworn general
pose stat
35
25
15
5
0
30
20
10
92 04
ercent growth in number
personnel employed by
e and local law enforcement agencie
96 00
SHERRIFS OFFICE | ALL AGENCIES | LOCAL POLICE | STATE
and without hesitation use rubber pellets, mace, batons
and pepper spray to prevent the political opposition
from voicing meaningful protest.
Alex S. Vitale, associate professor in sociology at
Brooklyn College, told Arun Gupta of AlterNet in
September that he pinpoints intense changes in
police behavior to the 1999 World Trade Organization
Ministerial in Seattle. Policing is more militarized
or pre-emptive depending on the department.
Since that time, police have concentrated on mass
arrests, inltration and surveillance and orchestrated
police riots in conjunction with shooting tear gas
and rubber bullets into non-violent crowds, as they
did at the Democratic National Convention in 2000.
Following the Seattle police riot, the establishment
employed a more militarized response to dissent.
The message that any signicant political demonstra-
tion will invite a brutal response from the state was not
lost on the Occupy movement.
Erik Kain, writing for Forbes last November at the
height of the Occupy demonstrations on Wall Street,
said we should make no mistake, the powers of
the police in this country have grown out of hand....
Occupy Wall Street may need to grow up and evolve,
but a far greater and more pressing issue facing this
country is what to do about the security state weve
erected about us at the local, state, and federal level.
Between the Patriot Act and the War on Drugs, its hard
to see a light at the end of the tunnel.
For the Occupy movement, there was no light at the
end of the tunnel as they naively struggled to resurrect
their movement. Local police departments around the
country colluded with the Department of Homeland
Security in a coordinated effort to destroy the move-
ment and send a strong message to activists around
the country: organized political dissent will not be tol-
erated and will be met with militarized police armed
to the teeth with equipment provided by the Pentagon
and paid for by generous grants from the Department
of Homeland Security.
Kurt Nimmo is the editor at www.infowars.com
and the author of Another Day in the Empire: Life in
Neoconservative America.
Dead Doctors Dont Lie is
an alternative health tell all
that makes doctors cringe. It
is a reference guide on nutri-
tional supplements for nearly
400 diferent diseases.
Dr. Wallach looks beyond
written history and search-
es for clues that reveal the
events, technology and the
forces that have led humanity
down the path of a pandemic
of obesity.
Lets Play Doctor shows you
how to read a medical pre-
scription and how to interpret
lab reports and how to use
vitamins, minerals and herbs
for the treatment of 400 of the
most common diseases.
Tis book reveals the secrets
of the longest enduring
cultures and how they
maintained long life. It also
examines religious dietary
practices and anti-aging
techniques.
AVAILABLE NOW AT INFOWARSSHOP.COM
INFOWARS.COM
T
he U.S. Supreme Court began hearings in the case of
Jardines v. Florida Oct. 31 to decide if Joelis Jardines
Fourth Amendment rights were violated when police
searched his home without a warrant. Instead, the only
evidence they had to go on was the fact that their drug-snifng
dog alerted outside Jardines front door.
In 2006, after receiving an anonymous crime-stoppers tip that
Jardines was trafcking in marijuana, ofcers showed up out-
side Jardines door. The ofcers had no evidence other than the
anonymous tip. Without reasonable evidence they were unable
to obtain a search warrant, so they decided to bring along their
drug-snifng dog.
When Jardines opened his door to the ofcers, Franky alerted
his handler, indicating the presence of drugs inside the home.
The ofcers used the alert as probable cause, entered the prem-
ises and conducted a search, eventually arresting Jardines when
they found marijuana.
At issue is not the fact that Jardines had marijuana in his home.
At issue is how the police found it. Is it legal for police ofcers to
use their K-9 corps to sniff around outside your home based solely
WHERE IN THE CONSTITUTION DOES IT SAY
THE GOVERNMENT
HAS THE POWER TO DO

THAT?
written by DONNA ANDERSON
THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT IS USING THE WAR ON DRUGS AS AN
EXCUSE TO DENY OUR CIVIL RIGHTS, ERASING THE FOURTH AMENDMENT
ONE WORD AT A TIME. THE FOURTH AMENDMENT STATES THAT OFFICERS
MUST HAVE REASONABLE CAUSE TO SEARCH YOUR HOME AND SEIZE YOUR
PROPERTY, BUT RECENT EVENTS INDICATE ALL THEY NEED IS A REASON
AND IT DOESNT EVEN HAVE TO BE A GOOD ONE. IN FACT, IF THEY WANT
TO, THEY CAN JUST MAKE ONE UP ALL IT TAKES IS AN ANONYMOUS TIP.
THE FOURTH AMENDMENT:
46
PRISONPLANET.COM
WHERE IN THE CONSTITUTION DOES IT SAY
THE GOVERNMENT
HAS THE POWER TO DO

THAT?
on an anonymous tip? And if that dog alerts, are
they then legally allowed to enter your home and
conduct a warrantless search? Gregory Garre, the
attorney representing the State of Florida seems to
think its perfectly justied:
The police did the same thing that millions of
Americans will do on Halloween night, which is walk
up to the front steps, knock on the door, and while they
were there, they took in the air and the dog alerted to
the smell of illegal narcotics.
In this case though, Jardines couldnt simply turn off
his porch light and tell the trick-or-treaters to go home.
Because the dog had alerted, the police ofcers now
had probable cause to search Jardines home, and he
was forced to allow them to enter. Had he refused he
would have been arrested for obstructing the search.
Jardines lawyer, Public Defender Howard
Blumberg, believes the police action constituted ille-
gal search and seizure and violates Jardines Fourth
Amendment rights.
The entire history of the Fourth Amendment really
is based on the fact that the home is different, says
Jardines lawyer, Howard Blumberg. It goes all the
way back to the early 1600s and the saying that a mans
home is his castle.
The Florida State Supreme Court agreed with
Blumberg. The case now stands before the U.S. Supreme
Court and is expected to be decided by June 2012.
Before you say Jardines got what he deserved because
he had marijuana in his home, stop and think about
your own home. Do you know who lived there before
you? Maybe they left some marijuana seeds in a crack
in the oor somewhere. Have you had house guests
recently? What if they had marijuana in a suitcase
while they were visiting? Jardines case is just one of
many. It could happen to you next.
The Fourth Amendment guarantees, The right of the
people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers,
and effects, against unreasonable searches and sei-
zures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall
issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or
afrmation, and particularly describing the place to be
searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
The Fourth Amendment is generally held to mean
that a search warrant must be judicially sanctioned,
meaning it must be issued by a judge who is sworn to
support the Constitution of the United States. Before
being issued, specic information supporting proba-
ble cause must be supplied and sworn to by a person,
usually an ofcer of the law, who will then be held
accountable to the issuing court.
An anonymous tip hardly qualies as supported by
Oath or afrmation but apparently these days thats
all it takes to send out the drug-snifng dogs.
LEGALLY, ALL YOUR
PROPERTY
MAY BE SEIZED
Under current asset forfeiture laws, the police have
the power to seize all your property simply by claiming
it has some connection to illegal drugs or trafcking.
They dont have to prove you committed a crime, and
they dont even have to accuse you. If they see you
have a large amount of cash they can seize it, claim the
money was connected with a crime, and you have to
prove youre innocent and that you obtained the money
legally before you can reclaim it.
Sadly, if youre carrying a large amount of cash that
means you probably dont have a lot left in the bank,
so you dont have enough money left to hire a lawyer.
And since the law allows the authorities to keep your
money until you prove your innocence, the cops have
an incentive to make false accusations, seize your
money, and then hope you dont have enough money
left to defend yourself.
The easiest way for the police to connect your
money or property to illegal drug activity is to have
one of their drug dogs come in and give it a sniff.
Once those dogs alert your assets are gone. And
theres no doubt about it if the dogs are there,
theyll nd something to bark about. Just ask any out-
of-state driver who happens to be traveling one of our
nations many interstate highways, more commonly
known as drug corridors.
YOURE AN EASY MARK
ON THE HIGHWAY, TOO.
Using the War on Drugs as their cover story, every U.S.
state has what they call a drug corridor, a section of
highway they monitor, looking for drug trafckers. Oc-
casionally they nd one, but since they monitor the traf-
c leaving the state, not the trafc coming in, its more
likely all theyre really going to nd in those drug cars
is money. And thats just the way they like it.
More often than not, though, its the average citizen
who pays the price and helps pads the states coffers.
Take Jerome Chennault, for example.
In 2010, Chennault was traveling between Henderson,
Nevada, and his home in South Carolina when he was
pulled over in Edwardsville, Ill., for following another
car too closely. The ofcer asked Chennault to step out
of his car for questioning, which would understandably
make anyone nervous.
The ofcer became suspicious of Chennault because
he had an inappropriate laugh, so he asked Chennault
if he could search his car. Given the circumstances, the
only thing Chennault could say was, Yes. Had he
refused, the cop would have either followed him down
the road or found some other reason to push the issue.
Easier to agree and get it over with, right?
During the search, the ofcer found $22,870 in a
side pocket of Chennaults travel bag in his backseat,
and under current laws law enforcement ofcials are
allowed to seize assets they suspect are tied to illegal
activities. But how could the cop tie this cash to illegal
activities when there was nothing else in the car? Call
in the drug-snifng dogs, of course. Surely, that dog
can nd something.
And sure enough, when the dog arrived on the scene
it took one whiff of that money and alerted the handler
that it smelled drugs. Chennaults $22,870 was imme-
diately conscated, and he was dragged off to jail.
As it turns out, Chennault was carrying a lot of cash
because he was planning to buy a house. He told of-
cials that hed withdrawn $28,000 in cash from his own
account in Las Vegas and had left home with it three
or four months prior intending to buy a house in South
Carolina while staying with a nephew.
Chennault had no drugs in his car. And how many
hands had that money passed through before it came
into his possession? Yet, because the dog alerted,
Chennaults money was all conscated and he had to
spend more than $2,000 in court and attorney fees,
plus a couple of trips across country, to get his money
back with no reimbursement for his time or expenses.
The state of Nevada, on the other hand, was now more
than $22,000 richer.
A similar incident happened to Terrence Huff. On
Dec. 10, while driving down I-70 in Collinsville, Ill.,
another drug corridor, Huff was pulled over for weav-
ing across lanes.
Huff was also asked to step out of the car, and after
running a check on Huffs license the ofcer agreed to let
him go with a warning. As Huff started to get in the car,
the ofcer piped up and said, Let me ask you a question
real quick. At that point, Huff knew he was hosed.
After ring off a series of rolling no questions, try-
ing to get Huff to admit that he was carrying drugs or
weapons or cash, the ofcer thought Huff looked ner-
vous and decided to call in the dogs.
The ofcer had to take the dog around the car twice
before it alerted to drugs, but it did so at the front of
the car, out of view of the cops dashboard camera. He
explained that because the front of the car was down-
wind the drug scent would be more noticeable at the
front of the car.
That alert was all it took to give the cop probable
cause to search Huffs car, his luggage and all of his
personal possessions. Even though he found no drugs,
the ofcer did tell Huff he found evidence of marijuana
shake or residue under the seat, just enough to justify
the use of the drug-snifng dog. Huff was let off with a
warning. With no drugs in evidence, and because Huff
wasnt carrying anything valuable, the state of Illinois
didnt make any extra money that day.
47
DRUG-SNIFFING DOGS
ARE A FARCE
In each of these cases drug-snifng dogs were used
to create probable cause, thus enabling the police to
search the home or vehicle without a search warrant.
Even more important, in each of these cases the
dogs were also called in based on unsubstantiated
evidence an anonymous tip or an inappropriate
laugh or a nervous response to an intimidation tactic
something that couldnt be sworn to in a court of law.
Make no mistake these searches were all going to
happen, and they were based solely on the assumption
that there was property on hand worth seizing. The
dogs were only called in as an enabling measure so the
law enforcement authorities could legally seize assets,
no matter how those assets were originally obtained.
But Gene Papet, executive director of K9 Resources,
a company that trains drug-snifng dogs, says theyre
not always reliable. In fact, the dogs can be trained to
alert, even when there are no drugs around.
Just before the dog alerts, you can hear a change in the
tone of the handlers voice. Thats troubling, Papet said,
after viewing the video of Huffs trafc stop. I dont know
anything about this particular handler, but thats often an
indication of a handler thats cuing a response.
You also hear the handler say at one point that
the dog alerted from the front of the car because the
wind is blowing from the back of the car to the front,
so the scent would have carried with the wind,
Papet continued. But the dog was brought around
the car twice. If thats the case, the dog should have
alerted the rst time he was brought to the front of
the car. The dog only alerted the second time, which
corresponded to what would be consistent with a
vocal cue from the handler.
In the 2005 Illinois v. Caballes case, the U.S. Supreme
Court ruled that having a drug-snifng dog check the
exterior of a vehicle during a routine trafc stop was
not a violation of the Fourth Amendment, but Justice
David Souter dissented, pointing to a study conducted
by the state of Illinois used in its own briefs that said
drug dogs fail 12.5 to 60 percent of the time.
As Papet stated, its not that the dogs cant pick up
the scent of the drugs, its that theyve been bred and
trained to please their handlers. Thats what dogs do.
So its easy for even the most conscientious police
ofcer to unconsciously use body language that trig-
gers the dog to alert.
Even more interesting, in 2011 the Chicago Tribune
published a review of drug dog searches conducted
over a three-year period. Only 44 percent of the dog
alerts actually led to the discovery of contraband,
and for Hispanic drivers that rate dropped to only
27 percent, suggesting that drug dogs react to their
handlers suspicions.
DEFINITION OF
PROPERTY
Where are the boundaries? If police ofcers and
their drug-snifng four-legged friends are allowed to
go snifng around inside your car and outside your
home, without a search warrant, where do our Fourth
Amendment rights begin and end? Can they search
your garage or outbuildings? What about your elds or
unused acres of land?
In October, U.S. District Judge William Griesbach
adopted a recommendation by U.S. Magistrate Judge
William Callahan stating that police are allowed, in
some circumstances, to install hidden surveillance
cameras on private property without obtaining a search
warrant. The defendants in the case, Manuel Mendoza
and Marco Magana of Green Bay, Wis., now also face
federal drug charges after DEA agent Steven Curran
claimed to have discovered more than 1,000 marijuana
plants growing on their property.
Brett Reetz, the attorney representing Mendoza and
Magana, asked that the evidence against the two be
dismissed on the grounds that it violated the Fourth
Amendment. The heavily-wooded 22-acre property was
clearly posted with No Trespassing signs, and there
was also a locked gate across the entrance. Clearly,
this was private property.
But U.S. Attorney James Santelle argued that,
Placing a video camera in a location that allows
law enforcement to record activities outside of a
home and beyond protected curtilage does not vio-
late the Fourth Amendment.
Curtilage is the outdoor area immediately surround-
ing the home, which harbors the intimate activity
associated with the sanctity of a mans home and the
privacies of life. In the 1987 case United States v. Dunn
the court stated:
[C]urtilage questions should be resolved with
particular reference to four factors: the proximity of
the area claimed to be curtilage to the home, whether
the area is included within an enclosure surrounding
the home, the nature of the uses to which the area
is put, and the steps taken by the resident to protect
the area from observation by people passing by.
Rather, these factors are useful analytical tools only
to the degree that, in any given case, they bear upon
the centrally relevant consideration whether the
area in question is so intimately tied to the home itself
that it should be placed under the homes umbrella
of Fourth Amendment protection.
Reetz argues, [T]hat ones actions could be recorded
on their own property, even if the property is not
within the curtilage, is contrary to societys concept
of privacy. The owner and his guest... had reason to
believe that their activities on the property were not
subject to video surveillance as it would constitute a
violation of privacy.
But in U.S. v. Dunn, the Supreme Court ruled that,
[O]pen elds do not provide the setting for those
intimate activities that the Amendment is intended to
shelter from government interference or surveillance.
The Court also stated that open fields are usually
accessible to the public, and even if No Trespassing
signs are posted theyre generally ineffective, which
seems to suggest that, because some average Joe
out there is bound to trespass on your property
sooner or later, that makes it perfectly legal for the
cops to violate your privacy, too. To heck with the
THE EASIEST WAY
FOR THE POLICE
TO CONNECT YOUR
MONEY OR PROPERTY
TO ILLEGAL DRUG
ACTIVITY IS TO HAVE
ONE OF THEIR DRUG
DOGS COME IN AND
GIVE IT A SNIFF.
Constitution of the United States.
And bringing it back around to the Jardines case with
the drug-snifng dogs, apparently curtilage ends at
the tip of the drug-snifng dogs nose. If that happens
to be your front doorstep, so be it.
A jury trial for the Mendoza/Magana case is sched-
uled for Jan. 22, 2013.
IMPROVED
TECHNOLOGY MEANS
ITS EVEN EASIER TO
VIOLATE YOUR RIGHTS
In January 2012 the U.S. Supreme Court reached
a surprisingly unanimous decision that requires
police to obtain search warrants before planting GPS
tracking devices on vehicles, stating that the prac-
tice strictly violated Americans Fourth Amendment
rights to be free from warrantless searches.
However, the agreement, while suggestive, fails to
include using the GPS tracking abilities of cell phones
and other mobile devices, nor does it include the use
of drones for tracking and surveillance, and, as weve
already seen, it doesnt matter anyway as long as theyre
conducting their surveillance outside the curtilage zone.
And even the curtilage zone doesnt matter because
the Supreme Court has held that aerial surveillance
of curtilage is not included in the protections from
unwarranted search so long as the airspace above
the curtilage is accessible by the public.
THE DECLARATION OF
INDEPENDENCE
The Declaration of Independence states two very fun-
damental propositions. First, the institution of govern-
ment is created to protect our rights not create them,
dole them out to us or deny those rights whenever they
dont jive with their needs
The government is created to protect the rights that we,
as human beings, are already endowed with by our Creator.
The right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. As
long as were not infringing on someone elses rights, were
free to exercise our own rights any way we see t.
Second, when the government fails to protect those
rights, we, the people, have not only the right, but the
responsibility, to change or abolish that government.
In anticipation of the growth of a power hungry gov-
ernment elite, the people of the United States demanded
the inclusion of the Bill of Rights before theyd ratify
the Constitution. That Bill of Rights included a list of
amendments, things the government shall not be per-
mitted to do, under any circumstance, ever. Included
in that list is the Fourth Amendment, guaranteeing our
right to be secure from warrantless search and seizure.
The wolf is literally at the door. Its time that we, the
American people, stop allowing the government to con-
trol our lives and start rejecting the idea that the Federal
Government has unlimited power. It doesnt. Instead,
we need to be asking, Where in the Constitution does
it say the government has the authority to do that?
JOIN US IN OUR FIGHT AGAINST TYRANNY & HELP US SPREAD THE TRUTH
ADVERTISING SPACE IS LIMITED SECURE YOUR SPOT NOW
CONTACT INFOADS
@
INFOWARS.COM FOR MORE INFORMATION
SEPT oct nov DEC jan FEB
MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG
100K PRINT & DIRECT MAIL - 1500 AUSTIN LOCATIONS - 164K EMAIL LIST - LOCAL & NATIONAL AUDIENCE
COMPLIMENTARY DESIGN SERVICES AVAILABLE
ADVERTISING SPOTS TO ACCOMMODATE ANY BUDGET
FRANCHISING OPPORTUNITIES AVAILABLE SOON
INFOWARS.COM
A
privacy rights watchdog is suing the
Department of Homeland Security for
information relating to the agencys prac-
tice of loaning out Predator drones to law
enforcement agencies in the U.S.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) wants
to obtain and make public details regarding the
DHS granting permission for domestic police
departments to borrow and operate the same type
of drones that are used by the military in Afghani-
stan and elsewhere.
Information via news items, DHS press releas-
es and word of mouth has made it apparent that
the DHS is overseeing predator drone ights for
a range of local, state and federal law enforce-
ment agencies.
The Customs and Border Protection (CBP) is
ying DHS drones tted with video cameras, infra-
red cameras, heat sensors, and radar. The Texas
Rangers, as well as the Bureau of Land Manage-
ment and the Department of Defense, have also
used DHS drones. Even a county sheriffs depart-
ment in North Dakota is reported to have operated
a predator drone belonging to the DHS.
Weve seen bits and pieces of information on
CBPs Predator drones, but Americans deserve the
full story, said EFF Staff Attorney Jennifer Lynch.
In October, the EFF led suit in a federal court in
San Francisco after the DHS did not respond to a
Freedom of Information Act request.
Drones are a powerful surveillance tool that can
be used to gather extensive data about you and
your activities. The public needs to know more
about how and why these Predator drones are
being used to watch U.S. citizens.
The EFF is also suing the U.S. Federal Aviation
Administration for similar information regarding
authorization of drone
ights by domes-
tic police depart-
ments. The agency
has released some
information, but is
responding too slowly
to FOIA requests,
meaning any data
EFF receives is already
well out of date.
FAAs foot-dragging
means we cant get a
real-time picture of
drone activity in the
U.S., said Lynch. If
ofcials could release
their records in a timely fashion or publish it as
a matter of routine on the FAA website we could
stop ling these FOIA requests and lawsuits.
THE FULL EFF FOIA
LAWSUITS CAN BE
VIEWED HERE:
e.org/node/72156
e.org/node/72155
Earlier this year, DHS Secretary Janet Napoli-
tano, or Big Sis as she will now forever be known,
announced that the agency is preparing to use
unmanned surveillance drones for the purposes of
public safety. What that entails is anyones guess.
The DHS also intends to deploy another type
of airborne drone surveillance, known as aerial
remote sensing services, using LIDAR (Light
JANET NAPOLITANO
- Secretary of Homeland
Security
Detection And Ranging) technology. The very same
technology is routinely utilized to track insurgents
in Afghanistan and Iraq. The DHS says it plans to
spend up to $50 million on the spy system, for the
purposes of emergency and non-emergency inci-
dents within the United States. Again, your guess
is as good as ours as to what this really means.
Other U.S. law enforcement bodies are already
using drone technology to spy on Americans. In
December last year, a Predator B drone was called
in to conduct surveillance over a family farm in
North Dakota as part of a SWAT raid on the Bros-
sart family, who were treated as suspects when
six missing cows wandered onto their land. Local
police had already used the drone, which is based
at Grand Forks Air Force Base, on two dozen occa-
sions beforehand.
Last summer, the DHS also gave the green light
for police departments in the United States to
deploy the ShadowHawk mini-drone helicopter,
which has the ability to taze suspects from above as
well as the ability to carry 12-gauge shotguns and
grenade launchers. The drone, also used against
insurgents in Afghanistan and Iraq, is already
being used by the Montgomery County Sheriffs
ofce in Texas, albeit unarmed for the moment.
Other police departments in Seattle, California,
Florida and New York have recently met with stern
opposition after announcing plans to roll out other
smaller surveillance drones tted with infrared
capable HD cameras.
A bill passed by Congress in February paves the
way for the use of surveillance drones in US skies
on a widespread basis. The FAA predicts that by
2020 there could be up to 30,000 drones in oper-
ation nationwide.
Recently released FAA documents obtained by
BIG SIS LOANING
OUT MILITARY STYLE
DRONES TO SHERIFF'S
DEPARTMENTS:
PRIVACY GROUP SUES
50
PRISONPLANET.COM
existing jurisprudence suggests that a review-
ing court would likely uphold drone surveillance
conducted with no individualized suspicion when
conducted for purposes other than strict law
enforcement.
Furthermore, the International Association of
Chiefs of Police (IACP), the biggest union of law
ofcials in the U.S., recently issued a stark warning
about increased drone use. The union released guide-
lines calling for a reassessment of the potential wide-
spread use of aerial drones for domestic policing.
Despite all these facts, surveys have revealed that
close to half of Americans say they are in favor of
police departments deploying surveillance drones
domestically.
Steve Watson is the London-based writer and
editor for www.infowars.com and www.prison-
planet.com. He has a masters in international
relations from the University of Nottingham.
LAST SUMMER, THE DHS ALSO
GAVE THE GREEN LIGHT FOR
POLICE DEPARTMENTS IN THE
UNITED STATES TO DEPLOY
THE SHADOWHAWK MINI-
DRONE HELICOPTER, WHICH
HAS THE ABILITY TO TAZE
SUSPECTS FROM ABOVE AS
WELL AS THE ABILITY TO
CARRY 12-GAUGE SHOTGUNS
AND GRENADE LAUNCHERS.
written by STEVE WATSON
BIG SIS LOANING
OUT MILITARY STYLE
DRONES TO SHERIFF'S
DEPARTMENTS:
PRIVACY GROUP SUES
the Center for Investigative Reporting revealed
that the FAA gave the green light for surveillance
drones to be used in U.S. skies despite the fact
that during the FAAs own tests the drones crashed
numerous times even in areas of airspace where
no other aircraft were ying.
The documents illustrate how the drones pose
a huge public safety risk, contradicting a recent
coordinated PR campaign on behalf of the drone
industry which sought to portray drones as safe,
reliable and privacy-friendly.
Critics have warned that the FAA has not acted
to establish any safeguards whatsoever, and that
Congress is not holding the agency to account.
Another report, released in September by the
Congressional Research Service, found that the
prospect of drone use inside the United States
raises far-reaching issues concerning the extent
of government surveillance authority, the value of
privacy in the digital age, and the role of Congress
in reconciling these issues.
Police ofcers who were once relegated to naked
eye observations may soon have, or in some cases
already possess, the capability to see through walls
or track an individuals movements from the sky,
the report notes. One might question, then: What
is the proper balance between the necessity of the
government to keep people safe and the privacy
needs of individuals?
The ability to closely monitor an individuals
movements with pinpoint accuracy may raise
more signicant constitutional concerns than
some other types of surveillance technology, the
CRS said.
Unless a meaningful distinction can be made
between drone surveillance and more traditional
forms of government tracking, the report notes,
DRONE BRAINS?
Those pesky terrorists. Always jumping over fences
and running off into the trees. Exactly how is the Pen-
tagon going to track their every move when they are
so adept at such feats? The answer may come in the
form of a new unmanned drone developed by DARPA
that can autonomously dodge obstacles.
IEEE Specturm reports that Researchers at Cornell
University, with funding from DARPA and Defense
contractor Lockheed Martin, have developed hard-
ware that acts like a brain when it receives information
from a camera, enabling a drone to dodge any obsta-
cles it flies too close to.
Software operating with the camera creates a 3D model
of the surroundings and fires a network of artificial
neurons. The drones brain then determines what
objects are in its path and plots a route around them.
The researchers say that in 53 out of 55 autonomous
flights in obstacle-rich environments, the drone
avoided everything in its path and did not crash. In two
of the tests it did collide with objects. The researchers
say this was due to wind factors. They hope to develop
the technology further to incorporate this, as well as
moving objects, such as birds or planes.
In their paper, titled Low-Power Parallel Algorithms
for Single Image based Obstacle Avoidance in Aerial
Robots, the researchers note: In outdoor robotic
experiments, our algorithm was able to consistent-
ly produce clean, accurate obstacle maps which
allowed our robot to avoid a wide variety of obstacles,
including trees, poles and fences. It is clear that this
technology is intended for domestic use.
As we have noted, the FAAs recent legislative
onslaught has opened up U.S. skies to drones oper-
ated by the military, federal government and law
enforcement agencies, and private companies.
However, critics have pointed out that the FAAs own
safety tests have proved anything but convincing.
DARPA and Lockheed are clearly hoping that this
new development will go some way to silencing those
critics. Critics it will not silence, however, are those
concerned for their privacy. Activists have rounded on
their local government representatives in many areas
of the country in an attempt to stop the drone invasion
before it gets out of hand.
FAA documents recently obtained and released by
the Electronic Frontier Foundation have confirmed
that the roll out of domestic unmanned drones will,
for the most part, be focused solely on spying on
the American people. When applying for a license to
operate drones, an overwhelming amount of opera-
tors stated that they intended to use the devices for
surveillance.
And dont think you can run off into the woods to hide.
The DARPA drones are coming
51
S
everal governments central banks and
billionaires have made questionably sizable
increases to their physical gold holdings over
the past few years, withdrawing troves from
U.S. and European banks in what can be interpreted as
a bad omen for oundering at currencies.
There are various explanations for the frenzied rush
into the safety of the precious metal, the most obvious
being golds steadfast reputation as the worlds most
valuable and highly sought-after metal. Purchasing gold
could stabilize a countrys currency reserves, or could
help amass and protect national wealth.
Some countries, however, are buying gold as a
hedge against the gradual, but seemingly inevitable,
devaluation of the once-prosperous world reserve
currency, otherwise known as the Federal Reserve Note
or U.S. dollar. This trend should be recognized and
heeded as a warning.
Central bank buying
Numerous central banks have seen the proverbial
writing on the wall and have been purchasing gold
in huge amounts. In the past 11 years, weve witnessed
golds price steadily increase and spike at around
$1,917.00, an all-time high for the yellow metal that,
just four years ago, was valued below $1,000 (In reality,
the value of gold has stayed the same; its the dollars
purchasing power thats dwindled.)
According to Bloomberg News, Nations bought 254.2
tons in the rst half of 2012 and may add close to 500
tons for the year, the London-based World Gold Council
said in August.
In 2011, Mexicos central bank increased its gold
holdings from seven to approximately 100 tons, an
increase of 1,300 percent. They further purchased 16.8
metric tons this past March.
Brazil recently increased their gold reserves for the
rst time in four years to 35.3 tons this past September.
South Koreas central bank also picked up about half a
million troy ounces in the same month bringing their
national tally to about 70 tons.
This past July, Russia bumped up its gold reserves by
about 597 million troy ounces. According to the World
Gold Council, Russia has more than doubled its gold
reserves in the past ve years, MartketWatch reported
in September.
In November 2012, Turkeys central bank boosted their
holdings by 6.8 tons and Ukrainian central banks also
bought up gold as well, the formers prime minister, Recep
Tayyip Erdgan, recently suggesting Turkey return to the
gold standard, a currency system in which legal tender is
backed up by and could be exchanged for actual gold.
Analysts agree that golds high demand by central
written by ADAN SALAZAR
PRISONPLANET.COM 53
banks facilitates the constant ebb and ow of the spot
price urging it to stay mainly positive. Commodities
analyst at Standard Chartered Plc Dan Smith told
Bloomberg News in October: We expect strong buying
by central banks to continue. They will be encouraged
by lower prices and continued worries about ination
and currency risks.
Who else is buying?
Central banks arent the only ones getting in on the
gold bonanza.
In 2011, India imported 969 tons of gold, not to ll
their central bank vault or to balance their reserves,
but to meet consumer demand. India heavily uses gold
to produce jewelry, and citizens also give it as gifts
during special occasions like weddings and festivals.
On specially designated holidays marked on the Indian
Hindu calendar, the public is encouraged to purchase
gold for various symbolic reasons.
Billionaire and investment banker George Soros, in
August 2012, sold his equity positions in major nancial
stocks and went about acquiring approximately 884,000
shares (about $130 million) of gold through the SPDR
Gold Trust. Soros is a major insider and his move
from stocks to gold preceded the Feds QE Unlimited
announcement one month later.
In the same month, another investor/billionaire, John
Paulson, according to Bloomberg, raised his stake in an
exchange-traded fund tracking the price of gold while
selling other stocks during the second quarter, leaving
his $21 billion hedge fund with more than 44 percent of
its U.S. traded equities tied to bullion. In 2010, Paulson
gave a speech to the University Club in New York City
predicting a $4,000 per ounce spot price if gold and
paper monies continued their trends.
So, whats driving the
price up?
Its safe to say that gold prices are being kept articially
low. Our at paper dollar has no real intrinsic value and
is only legal tender because federal laws declare it be
accepted under penalty of ne or imprisonment.
As previously noted, the value of gold really isnt going
up; its not becoming more valuable. Its the dollars
purchasing power thats dying.
Joseph Plummers book Dishonest Money discusses
Americas rst at currency which appeared around
1690. Massachusetts had failed a military campaign
against Quebec and was left in debt and unable to pay
her troops. Rather than raise taxes, the state decided to
issue printed paper money. Heres what happened:
As the printing presses inated the money supply,
legal tender laws were instituted to ensure the worthless
paper was accepted. Predictably, gold and silver coins
disappeared from circulation in the colonies. (Why
pay with real money when all you could expect was
at paper in return?) The only time gold and silver
coins were spent was with foreigners who demanded
real money as payment for their products and services.
This steadily drained the colonies total supply of gold
and silver. As the supply of gold and silver dwindled,
international trade nearly ceased. (Foreigners had no
interest in trading their products for at paper; who
could blame them.)
Ination, decreased condence in the dollar,
speculation, supply and demand and out-of-control
printing presses are the main reasons the price of gold
appears to be rising.
Waning Confidence in
Fiat Currencies
Some countries leaders are anticipating rough
nancial waters ahead and are going as far as to
repatriate their gold.
Late last year, Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez
demonstrated his loss of faith in at currencies when he
announced plans to retrieve $11 billion of his countrys
gold from their stores in Switzerland, England, the
United States, Canada and France. Chavez explained
the move as a safeguard against instability in nancial
Federal Reserve Bank of New York, grew uncomfortable
with the direction of the U.S. economy. Since May, some
German politicians have been requesting an audit of the
bank, however, the banks strict security does not allow
for even owners to view their own gold.
This situational irony isnt lost on trends researcher
Gerald Celente, who earlier this year said, Its not
only Germany [whos gold is missing], its the United
Sates, its all of the countries. Nobody knows whats
in Fort Knox. They wont let anybody in. Wheres the
gold in the United States? How come we cant go in
and look in Fort Knox?
Across the pond, the euro is also on shaky ground and
seems to be imitating the dollars descent. In August,
British investment banker Lord Jacob Rothschild
revealed a 1.9 billion (approximately U.S. $3 billion)
investment in RIT Capital Partners, an investment trust
of which he is the executive chairman, upping a three
percent net short to seven percent, meaning RIT would
stand to more greatly benet if and when the price of
the eurozones ofcial currency decreased.
Should you be
concerned?
As mentioned, the price of gold per ounce has almost
doubled in the last four years alone.
markets, but had previously stated that he wanted to
eliminate the dictatorship of the U.S. dollar.
According to the Wall Street Journal, with the price
of gold rising, Chavez said it made more sense to store
his countrys gold at home: ...we dont only have oil
wealth; we also have one of the largest reserves of
gold in the world so we might as well convert it into
our international reserves because gold is increasing
in value.
Ecuadors government also recently made it known
they wanted to bring $1.7 billion in gold back to their
country.
The World Gold Councils Gold Demand Trends second
quarter 2012 report shows that Kazakhstan also increased
holdings from 24.5 to 26 tons in response to the ailing
dollar:
The bank previously stated that it
plans to buy the countrys entire
domestic production over the next
two to three years in order to
reduce its reliance on the U.S. dollar
as a reserve asset...
Recently, Germany, who has, since the Cold War,
stored approximately 1,500 tons of gold below the
Evidently, these three billionaires and various central
banks may be trying to tell us something. Their actions
could be the canary in the goldmine indicating nancial
disaster is coming. How these currencies have managed
to stay up as long as they have is anybodys guess.
A currency based on debt makes it impossible to
maintain economic solvency. While a return to the gold
standard may not be the answer to our problems, its
certain that individual ownership of gold would provide
tremendous security in the event of a nancial collapse.
Those who only possess at paper money may nd
themselves wishing they had gone in.
Adan Salazar is associate editor at www.infowars.com
and is an avid civil rights and due process advocate.
56
INFOWARS.COM
IWM: What got you into art and specifically tagging and murals? Also how did
you come up with the name Mear One?
Mear One: I began tagging and drawing on walls during junior high school in
1986. I got into a lot of trouble as a youth and needed a creative outlet. Grafti
allowed me to work out my frustrations with society while building a strong
artistic presence.
IWM: Describe your awakening processwas is gradual or did happen immediately?
M1: My mother was a very conscious artist who was a hippy and free- thinker. She taught me to distrust the system. We were on welfare most of my
adolescence, and this was tough in school and made it hard to make friends.
I had some powerful experiences as a child, hallucinations and political experiences shaped my thoughts and gave me a perspective.
IWM: Describe the process of how you take an idea from your head and the
transformation that takes place before it ends on a wall?
M1: I practice something I call projective thinking where I see a subtle transparent 3D projection of my vision and through my minds eye I project this
on my surface and trace over it. It is something that only I can see but is very
helpful in executing the work.
IWM: Your recent mural in England (NWO Is the Enemy of Humanity) has an
interesting confrontation story. What happened and how did you communicate
with the locals who were angry at the pyramid and all seeing eye? M1: I was detained when I arrived in England at the airport. I was put in a
detention tank with some Muslims from abroad. After 5 hours of interrogation
they let me go about my travels. I came to paint a mural and was ready to
work off some of the aggression I felt from my experience at the airport. I went to east London where there was an area called Shoredich and there was
lots of street art. When I started my mural I was confronted by a crowd of Muslims who lived in the area. The image I was painting had the all seeing
eye from the back of the dollar bill. They disapproved of this image because
they thought I was promoting the all-seeing eye. When I explained that I was trying to bring awareness to the subject they responded by asking me to
write something on the wall to prove it. So I wrote The NWO is the Enemy of
Humanity. This took them aback and allowed them to explore the meaning
of my work. Over the next few days I won the support of the community and
nished my piece. When I came home to LA I got an e-mail from the mayor
of the district claiming that I had painted a mural against Jews. My mural in
London was destroyed a few days later. Some religious extremist of the Jewish
sect declared that it was anti-Semitic and that I was a fascist. This was a lie. My
mural was about the elite banker ruling class and how they oppress humanity.
My intention was to paint this piece right outside of the bank district and
ARTIST PROFILE:
MEAR ONE
57 PRISONPLANET.COM
confront global new world order supporters. Because of the hysteria created by these (as I call them) fascists, my mural got international coverage and became a hot topic for people who normally dont care for street art. My original intention was to spark conversation and raise awareness on the subject matter. My experience at the airport prepared me to understand what third-world people have to deal with everyday: imperialism all over the world. Im grateful for this transformative experience and look for more life lessons.
IWM: How has the Internet changed your ability to get the word out on your work?
M1: I have become a blog maniac. I share much of what I do with the Internet followers and it is building on a daily basis. The Internet connects me to the whole world at once. I nd that I am my best promoter and writer. It all comes straight from the horses mouth and you can feel how real things are when it is genuine. From Tumblr to Facebook it all provides a level of getting up like old grafti days but in new forms, like the human subconscious.
IWM: What is the biggest problem facing humanity?
M1: I think one big problem is complacency. It prevents us from doing anything. We need to desire a better life and ght for it as opposed to accepting whatever were given.
IWM: Do you think the masses will awaken before society implodes? M1: I dont know if people will wake up in time for major Earth changes but some of us are and have. I used to say It sucks. Nothing is sacred any more, and a friend said That has been a problem that society has spoken of for thousands of years. I think were always on the verge of one perspective or another.
IWM: What is next for Mear One?
M1: I currently am nishing half a decade of canvas work I have been developing for my next solo show. These pieces are very special to me and deal with our world and humanity in the crux of the apocalypse.
57
INFOWARS.COM
By David Mivshek
ACROSS
1. Salts zombies crave
5. American Bankers Association and a sleeveless garment
worn by Arabs
9. Madrids emergency response sys.
14. It can be big, like pharma
15. Its manipulated by Monsanto
16. Hawaiian ofcial who certied Obamas questionable
birth certicates
17. Kind of deal
18. Emotion Jones feels for eugenicists
19. Ancient East Roman fortress city
20. Using ECHELON, GPS, or RFID to surveil society is an
example of this type of attack
23. Old Greek mistress
24. KRS-One is one
25. Purpose of the Warren Report, 9/11 Commission Re-
port, and Financial Crisis Inquiry Report, non-zombies say
28. Persian language
31. Bank Identier Code or a brand name of pens and
razors
32. Normal response to the photo of Zombie attack victim
Poppos chewed off face
36. Three nal lett. in a freedom request
37. Early movies
41. Marxists Internet Archive or Miamis nickname
42. Aware of
44. It puries GMO?
45. Palestinian Sunni Islamic party governing the Gaza
Strip
47. Operation Northwoods, Operation Gladio, or Opera-
tion Fast and Furious
51. Poke fun at
53. Joness rants on public radio
57. Citigroup, Chase, and Comerica were lendees in this
nancial free-for-all
60. Author of Spies, Lies, and Whistleblowers: MI5, MI6
and the Shayler Affair
61. Bamako is its capital
62. First woman Lieutenant Governor of British Columbia
63. Things that can be pros?
64. Between Two ____: Americas Role in the Technetronic
Era
65. Transportation Security Administration and Time-
stamping Authority
66. Cashless society control and power followers?
67. Giuliani said: Freedom is about the willingness of
every single human being to...
68. Message Obama may have repeated to himself during
his presidential campaign: ___ can!
1. Arab socialist party
2. Opposite of differ
3. Barack Obamas Rules for Revolution: The Alinsky
Model is one
4. Names of lords on the old Nazi propaganda radio pro-
gram Germany Calling
5. Flesh-eating, zombie-like Hindu sect
6. 27-Down
7. Bet blindly
8. Homeland Security wants this kind of person to say
something?
9. Places lled with vice and corruption, like D.C. and
Vegas
PUBLIC PREYS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16
17 18 19
20 21 22
23 24
25 26 27
28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35
36 37 38 39 40 41
42 43 44 45 46
47 48 49 50
51 52 53 54 55 56
57 58 59
60 61 62
63 64 65
66 67 68
10. Governmentless order
11. First woman to receive the Nobel Prize
12. Autocratic proclamation
13. Basic text of the Quran
21. Flavored soft drinks
22. USAF system that monitors and retargets nuclear
missiles
26. ____ Cyber City
27. Get the most votes, supposedly
28. Paranormal ghter over Germany
29. Advanced Intelligent Network or a biblical city
30. Rodent that developed tumors from eating Monsanto
GMO corn
33. ____ Qasr
34. And ye shall know the truth and the truth shall make
you free is this agcy.s motto
35. Vital essences of ancient Egyptian souls
38. Bay of Pigs is one
39. ____ Angeles
40. Richest woman in the Middle East
43. Follows a unique one?
46. Dexterity
48. Evaluate
49. 9/11 enemies are this, Bermas says
50. Keep the peace
51. Middle name of Socialist Internationals vice-president
52. Zombie-like mental state
54. Saddam Husseins necktie?
55. Sattva, rajas, and tamas
56. German citizen spy org.
57. Noise feared by opposers of the Second Amendment?
58. Emergency Management Assistance Corporation or an
Apple computer model
59. Emotion Jones feels when talking about the New World
Order
DOWN
P L O C E L A M P T A P S
C U B A N E R O L S T O A
I N A L E F E M A C A M P S
L A M E R T A S T O S O S
T R A N G O E S C
D Y N A M O T H I N K
A G R A I S M S E I I I
N E A R T E X A S C E L L
T A M E A I G A K E E L
I R A N I T I E L A P
D N R E G O I S M
S R C D I E G O L I N E A
L O N G C O U N T A N G R Y
I M A M T R O T E T Y M A
P E S O S O D O A S O O N
HOLIDAY SAMPLER GIFT PACK
142-SERVING EMERGENCY FOOD KIT
SAVE OVER 37% on 65 Servings
SAVE OVER 25% on 142 Servings
This essential emergency kit includes 142 total servings - 108 breakfast, lunch,
and dinner entrees plus 34 servings of rice, drinks, and desert. More than enough
food to feed 4 adults for a full week. Plus, you get the compact and durable cube
stove with 15 eFuel Discs making it very simple to boil water and cook your meal
no matter what the situation. Be ready for anything.
H
o
l
i
d
a
y P
a
c
k
s

Only 49.95
BONUS: For every $500 order of any Food Supply, youll receive an Emergency Food Kit FREE.
A 65-Serving supply of our top-selling, most popular items including breakfast,
4 varieties of delicious and hearty soup, and 5 healthy entrees plus drink and
desert. There is more than enough food to last over a week for 2 adults. The
sampler gift pack makes a great gift for family and loved ones - what about
those hard-to-find gifts for mom and dad? This is it!
efoodsdirect.com /alex efoodsdirect.com /alex
HOLIDAY SAMPLER GIFT PACK
142-SERVING EMERGENCY FOOD KIT
SAVE OVER 37% on 65 Servings
SAVE OVER 25% on 142 Servings
This essential emergency kit includes 142 total servings - 108 breakfast, lunch,
and dinner entrees plus 34 servings of rice, drinks, and desert. More than enough
food to feed 4 adults for a full week. Plus, you get the compact and durable cube
stove with 15 eFuel Discs making it very simple to boil water and cook your meal
no matter what the situation. Be ready for anything.
H
o
l
i
d
ay P
a
c
k
s

Only 49.95
BONUS: For every $500 order of any Food Supply, youll receive an Emergency Food Kit FREE.
A 65-Serving supply of our top-selling, most popular items including breakfast,
4 varieties of delicious and hearty soup, and 5 healthy entrees plus drink and
desert. There is more than enough food to last over a week for 2 adults. The
sampler gift pack makes a great gift for family and loved ones - what about
those hard-to-find gifts for mom and dad? This is it!
efoodsdirect.com /alex efoodsdirect.com /alex