Example11.1&11.

3(R&M)
CompareIdealCarnotandRankineCycle p y
SteamPowerPlant 8
Example11.1&11.3(R&M)Contd.
Compare Ideal Carnot and Rankine Cycle CompareIdealCarnotandRankineCycle
SteamPowerPlant 9
Example11.1&11.3(R&M)
Compare Ideal Carnot and Rankine Cycle CompareIdealCarnotandRankineCycle
SteamPowerPlant 10
Example11.1&11.3(R&M)(contd.)
Compare Ideal Carnot and Rankine Cycle CompareIdealCarnotandRankineCycle
SteamPowerPlant 11
Example11.3(contd.)
Compare Ideal Carnot and Rankine Cycle CompareIdealCarnotandRankineCycle
Cycle Efficiency
Carnot 0.404 Carnot 0.404
Rankine 0.350

SteamPowerPlant 12
Example11.2&11.3
CompareRealCarnotandRankineCycle Co pa e ea Ca ot a d a e Cyc e
SteamPowerPlant 14
Example11.2&11.3
Compare Real Carnot and Rankine Cycle CompareRealCarnotandRankineCycle
SteamPowerPlant 15
EffectofWorkRatioonnandSSC
Work Ratio Efficiency SSC (kg/kWh)
Cycle nc, nt =1.0 nc, nt =1.0 nc, nt =0.8 Ratio nc, nt =1.0 nc, nt =0.8 Ratio
Carnot 0.771 0.404 0.277 0.686 4.97 7.45 1.50
Rankine 0.997 0.350 0.279 0.797 3.84 4.81 1.25

Conclusion:
Due to low work ratio and efficiency of
compressor and turbine Efficiency and compressor and turbine, Efficiency and
SSC of Rankine Cycle is better than
Carnot Cycle.
SteamPowerPlant 16
y
Example11.4(R&M)
SteamPowerPlant 30
Ex11.4contd
SteamPowerPlant 31