Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Financial Assessment of Solid Waste Management
Financial Assessment of Solid Waste Management
Financial Assessment of Solid Waste Management
45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
28
9 5
Inadequate MSWM
7
Other*
Household Responses Numbers Indicate Percentages * - including traffic and congestion; noise; and hazardous waste
50
47 42
40 30 21 20 10 0
Household Responses
30
31
70%
70 60
61
50 40 30
33
20 10 0
Household Responses
NEED FOR SOCIAL ASSESSMENT IN MSWM INVESTMENTS WHAT IS SOCIAL ASSESSMENT? SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT ISSUES IN MSWM
SA establishes a framework for public participation appropriate to local conditions to help reach consensus on many aspects of MSWM, including proposed facility sites. The SA can help identify social monitoring indicators and participatory procedures to assess the social impacts of MSWM investments.
Stakeholders Social Diversity and Gender Institutions, Rules, and Behavior Public Participation Social Risks
Who are the main stakeholders in the MSWM system? Which individuals and groups need to be involved and how? What are the relationships between stakeholders and what are possible sources and consequences of conflicting interests among them. What may prevent stakeholders from fulfilling their responsibilities in managing waste responsibly? Whose capacity needs to be built to enable them to participate?
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT ISSUES: Stakeholders User Preferences, Needs, and Perceptions What aspect of the existing MSWM system bothers users the most? Are service users currently satisfied with their existing solid waste collection points? Where do households and other stakeholders prefer to take their garbage to be collected? How far will they walk to their preferred collection point?
10
11
12
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT ISSUES: Social Diversity and Gender Poverty Are there any social groups consistently excluded from the formal solid waste service? Will the poorer neighborhoods be adversely affected by or excluded from the new or improved services? What is the nature and extent of informal solid waste picking? How will the investment affect waste pickers?
13
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT ISSUES: Social Diversity and Gender Waste pickers are often among the poorest of the poor. They are vulnerable because they have few assets and few alternative livelihood options if their earnings from waste picking are threatened. The majority are independent and self-employed, so they have no social security or organizational support to help them through difficult times. Waste pickers may be of any age. Many children scavenge to supplement the family income. Others are abandoned and are simply trying to survive. Many older people also scavenge. In many countries, more women scavenge than men. Often they are single mothers, who bring their children to work with them.
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT ISSUES: Social Diversity and Gender Changes in collection and disposal practices of solid waste management systems can profoundly affect waste pickers and their livelihoods Programs can be developed for improving the income, working and living conditions, and providing access to social services. Doing this effectively requires a full understanding of the situation of waste pickers, their motivations for doing this work, their occupational and living conditions, and the organizational framework within which they work and live.
14
15
16
17
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT ISSUES: Social Diversity and Gender Willingness and Ability to Pay What is the current tariff and payment levels? What tariff level is needed to justify investment? Are beneficiaries willing and able to pay this amount? Are users willing to pay more to maintain current service level? What measures will be taken to ensure that the poor are subsidized? Would population be willing to pay in kind?
18
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT ISSUES: Social Diversity and Gender Gender, Age, Ethnicity If women are responsible for household waste disposal, will their role in carrying household waste to bins placed in public places be hindered in cultural settings where womens presence in public is discouraged? Are there any political or ethnic issues associated with sharing a waste disposal site? What role do children play in the MSWM system?
19
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT ISSUES: Institutions, Rules, and Behavior What are current waste generating practices of households; formal and informal industries; commercial enterprises; and institutions? Are service users aware of the need to manage solid waste better? How do they perceive and interact with their MSWM authorities? If the government is not providing an effective service, to whom do consumers turn for help? Does the municipal agency provide information and respond to complaints?
20
NIMBY (Not in My Backyard) Syndrome How is the public included into the site selection and planning processes? Will the public be consulted in all facility siting decisions? Do local EA regulations require adequate public participation?
21
22
23
MSWM investments often are justified on the basis of their meeting peoples needs; improving the living conditions of poorer communities and the working conditions of waste management workers; and improving incomes by encouraging re-use, waste reduction, and re-cycling. Social impact monitoring provides critical information on results on the ground, and shows whether planned outcomes are met, and if necessary, identifies measures needed to achieve them.
Demonstrated to Mayor that the public viewed MSWM as a priority and would pay more Allowed project preparation to proceed Influenced technical specifications of bins Influenced design of collection points Influenced location of transfer station Influenced closure of one in-city landfill Increased awareness of waste picker issues Contributed to successful project implementation
24
Toolkit: Social Assessment and Public Participation in MSWM (2004) http://www.worldbank.org/urban/usw m/socialassesstoolkit.pdf Social Analysis Sourcebook, World Bank (2003)
25