You are on page 1of 1

1. Globe-Mackay Cable and Radio Corporation v. NLRC, G.R. No. 82511, March 3, 1992 a. Literal Interpretation 2. Gonzales v.

Gonzales (58 Phil. 67 [1933]), March 7, 1933 G.R. No. L-37048 a. Dura lex sed lex 3. [G.R. No. 127325. March 19, 1997]. MIRIAM DEFENSOR SANTIAGO v COMELEC a. Departure form Literature 4. Melchor v. Commission on Audit, G.R. No. 95398, 16 August 1991, 200 SCRA 704. a. Ratio Legis 5. Federation of Free Farmers v CA G.R. No. L-41161 September 10, 1981 a. Literal import 6. PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK vs. OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT G.R. No. 104528 January 18, 1996 a. Death of Statute? 7. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, ET AL. vs. PANFILO M. LACSON. G.R. No. 149453 October 7, 2003] a. Construction to Accomplish Purpose 8. Ramirez v CA G.R. No. L-23587-88 June 10, 1976 a. Reason ceases, law ceases 9. CORNELIA MATABUENA vs. PETRONILA CERVANTES L-28771 (38 SCRA 284) March 31, 1971 (cant find original case) a. Courts may supply legislative omission 10. Rufino Lopez v. CTA, G.R. No. L-9274. February 1, 1957 a. Correction of Clerical errors 11. Paras v. COMELEC. G.R. No. 123169 (November 4, 1996) a. Adopt construction to avoid absurdity 12. People v Purisima G.R. No. L-42050-66 November 20, 1978 a. Construction to avoid injustice 13. Co Kim Chan v Valdez Tan Keh G.R. No. L-5 September 17, 1945 a. Construction to avoid danger to public interest 14. Salvacio v Central Bank [G.R. No. 94723. August 21, 1997] a. Construction to promote right and justice (CJ Corona/Bank Secrecy) 15. Demafiles v Comelec G.R. No. L-28396 December 29, 1967 a. Surplusage and superfluity 16. Province of Cebu v IAC G.R. No. 72841 January 29, 1987 a. Party exempted from rigid application of law 17. [G.R. No. 147066. March 26, 2001]. AKBAYAN Youth v Comelec a. The law does not require the impossible 18. Santillon v. Miranda, G.R. No. 19281, June 30, 1965, 14 SCRA 568 a. Number and Gender

You might also like