The first time we have met, he told me: I like to remember things my own way.

And then we spoke about memory. Do you really want to know how history is made? He wrote me: I want to hear your reactions immediately after seeing this movie. It is fragmentary; it reminds me of your project to the extent that it reflects the position of the narrator. It speaks about the concept of being situated in time, in places and about otherness. It is uncertain, tentative, emotive, and incomplete. But in this incompleteness, you gain a certain insight, knowledge maybe, and understanding. It raises important epistemological questions the possibility of not/showing things, capturing and processing the time,

SANS SOLEIL

looking for ways of expressing, articulation or things that are usually unspeakable. And he wrote to me: It is also a movie that instantly refers itself to itself; questioning moment after moment until reaching a point of negation in order to reestablish itself anew like a mirror that reflects the totality of the objects, of the bodies, faces and once again the time.