Professional Documents
Culture Documents
論證規則
論證規則
Anthony Weston
2000. 12
Anthony Weston
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
Modus Ponens
(25)
Modus Tollens
(26)
Hypothetical Syllogism
(27)
Disjunctive Syllogism
(28)
Dilemma
(29)
Reductio ad Absurdum
(30)
A.
(A1)
(A2)
(A3)
B.
(B1)
(B2)
(B3)
(B4)
(B5)
C.
(C1)
(C2)
(C3)
(C4)
(C5)
(C6)
argument
1986
1992
6
argument
disputation
inquiry
argumentative essays 1
Macbeth
argumentative essay
(1)
reasonstatement
premise
Winston Churchill
10
generalization
(2)
Bertrand Russell
(3)
A2
12
(4)
(5)
loaded
CIA
**
**
CIA
CIA
CIA
CIA
(6)
Senator Gunderson
14
X Y
Y X Y
X
Y X
Y X X Y
(7)
equivocation
15
16
argument by example
generalization
17
(8)
illustration
(9)
misrepresent
18
McGraw
1936
*
1980
Mildred Parten, Survey, Polls, and Samples (New York: Harper and Row, 1950), pp. 25, 290, 393f.
Parten
19
(10)
2.4%
20
50%
Volovo
Consumer Reports
Richard
NisbettLee Rossperson who*
100%
5% 50%
52,500 7,500
Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement (Englewood Cliffs, JN:
Prentice-Hall, 1980), p. 61man who
man
person
21
100%90%80%60%
50%*
80%
(11)
Peloponnesian War
Napoleonic Wars
22
23
arguments by analogy
ChippewaAdam
Nordwell
24
(12)
Niami News
9/23/73.
25
Santa Maria
David Hume
Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion
Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1980), Part II.
26
27
X Y
Y
(13)
28
(14)
Census Bureau
Jose Antonio
Nunez Villareal
Topheavy CollegeBernard
29
5%
30
(15)
Epson FX80
19 Epson FX80
19 *
Consumer Reports 1984 Buying Guide Issue, vol. 48, number 12 (Mount Vernon,
New York: Consumers Union of the United States, December, 1983), p. 96.
31
(16)
(17)
L. v. Mises, Human Action (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1963), p. 75.
32
ad hominem
33
correlation
(18)
A B AB A
B makes sense
AB A B
34
connection
(19)
35
Matthew Arnold
(20)
36
(21)
(22)
A B A B
B A
37
A B B A A
B A B B A
(23)
38
deductive argumenttruth
argumentative essay
p q
39
p
q
p q
p
q
p q p
q
40
p q
q
p
q q q p
k b
kb
b
k
41
b k
* Fred Hoyle
i h
i h
h
i
h
i
p q
q r
p r
k
k b
b
k
k - - k
42
(s)(r)
(r)(q)
(s)(q)
s r
r q
s q
p q q p
(q)(t)
s
t
18
p q
p
q
43
Bertrand Russell
(m)(i)
(m)
(i)
m i
m
i
or
a b a b ab
a b
or
p q
p
q
44
(28) Dilemma
p q
p r
qs
r s
Edmund Burke
r a p
r r
r p
r a
p a
45
p a
(p)(a)
(p)(w)
(a)(w)
(w)
p a
p w
a w
w
w w w
p
p p
q
q
p
arguments by reductio
46
David Hume
47
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
2429
48
2.
3.
A.
AB
A 1
A.
1.
B.
4.
5.
C.
6.
7.
D.
49
B.
C.
D.
8.
50
A.
AB C
(A1)
voucher plan
51
52
(A2)
(A3)
A1 A2
53
54
B.
(B1)
55
(B2)
(B3)
56
(B4)
(B5)
Q Q
57
58
C.
Dublin
(C1)
(C2)
59
(C3)
B2
A2
60
(C4)
61
(C5)
B4B5
62
(C6)
63
fallacies
false cause
(1)
National Enquirer
generalizing from incomplete
information
A B
Jean-Paul Sartre
ad hominem
65
ad ignorantiam
ad misericordiam
ad populum
p q
q
p
66
complex question
composition
67
p q
p
q
division
equivocation
false cause
false dilemma
68
loaded language
non sequitur
persuasive definition
Ambrose BierceThe Devil's
Dictionary
petitio principii
provincialism
69
red herring
straw man
suppressed evidence
Flames
and Glory
weasel word
A
B
A
A B
A
70
Wejack
Algonquia*
Wejack
Wejack
71
selfish
headache
synonym
72
stipulative definition
eco- gardening
heoytuy
operational definition
73
essential definition
genus-and
-differentia
74
Academy
Diogenes
75
John Venn
Venn diagram Copi
Howard Kahane
Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric, Belmont, California: Wadsworth, 6th edition,
1992
C. Hamblin Fallacies,
London: Methuen, 1970
Richard Nisbett Lee Ross
Human Inference, Eaglewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall,
1980
77