Professional Documents
Culture Documents
تونل سنگ انفجار
تونل سنگ انفجار
10 12 1390
1 i 2
1 mirzeinaly@gmail.com
2 - far.koli@yahoo.com
.
.
.
. 10
TNT . ) (Z0 ) (Pso
) (tA ) (t0
. .
.
.
.
.
60
. :
. .
40
40 .
50-40 .
.
09166635625 i
-1
.
.
.
-
.
-
= .<1
UDEC
= .<2 )1998(
= .<3 ( )2004
) (SHI ) (VHI
= .<4 ( )2004
= )2005( .<5
= .<6 ()2006
.
= .<7 ()2007
-
Shis DDA
= .<8 ( )2008
=.<9
2 .
10
TNT
0/2 .
.
.
-
.
UDEC .
. -
.
-2
10
.
20 45
( .)1
)1(
.
30
-
)2( .
.2
.
( : )1
( : )2
.
)
(
(
Em Er
Gm Gr
s .
-3
70
. 40 50 60 70
10 20 30 ( .)2
.
( -3) .
()
.
( 3).
( : )3
:
:
: ) (Z :
z r W 1/ 3
; r
; W .
: :
) (Pso ) (ta
) (t0 (.)4
( : )1
)(Er
()
()
(C)
)(
(Em)
2/325 Gpa
15
40
7 Mpa
0/25
5/8 Gpa
)(
2600 Kg/m3
)(JKn
)(JKs
1 10 Mpa/m
)(t j
11
)(Cj
1/5Mpa
( : )2 -
0/15
)30(cm
)2300 (Kg/m3
)21(Gpa
)25(Mpa
)(Kn
10
)8/410 (pa
TNT
10
22045 .
()4
.
40
.
40 50 .
20
10
60
( : )4 )(US Army
-4
( : )5
( )5
.
40 50
1
-
. ()6
.
.
10 40
40 .
()
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
()
0
-1
-2
-3
-4
-5
-6
-7
-8
-9
( : )6
80
( : )3
Moment
Axial
Depth
Shear
2.185
0.241
24.375
10
1. 233
0.209
17.761
20
0.869
0.118
8.201
30
0.352
0.050
4.603
40
0.240
0.035
3.360
50
0.208
0.032
2.432
60
0.171
0.029
1.983
70
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
.
)7( ( )9
-
. 40 40
.
40 50
.
-5
= .<10
.
.
()
( : )7
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
()
0.26
0.24
0.22
0.2
0.18
0.16
0.14
0.12
0.1
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
10
( : )9
()
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
70
60
40
50
()
30
20
10
()
.
)3(
)7( ( )9 .
2.4
2.2
2
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
( ) =.<11
-1-5
4
()
( : )8
.
)4( .
.
( )10 .
.
( : )4 -
22
1
(
)
2100 Kg/m
()
)(Er
)(Gr
)(
(C)
(Em)
(K)
(Gm)
()
(t)
(c)
)(j
)(Cj
)(t j
Gpa
Gpa
---
() () ()
14
12
2250
2600
2600
10
2/6
4/5
15/4
26/3
1/044
1/68
4/016
9/352
0/33
0/3
0/25
0/25
0/87
1/35
3/62
7/89
1/68
2/81
5/97
11/9
2/341 1/647
3/98
7/93
1/08
2/388
4/76
Gpa
Gpa
16
Mpa
Gpa
18
0/63
--Mpa
Mpa
32
40
50
60
1/13
1/46
2/852
4/54
28
40
70
110
32
40
50
60
0/22
0/3
0/9
1/6
0/22
0/3
0/85
1/53
--Mpa
Mpa
()
20
( : )11
)12( )11( .
.
0.24
( )9 .
.
0.2
0.18
0.16
0.14
0.12
()
-2-5
0.22
0.1
5
( : )11
()
-2
-2.5
-3
-3.5
-4
-4.5
-5
-5.5
-6
-6.5
-7
)9(
( )12
.
( : )9
()
1.9
1.8
1.7
1.6
1.5
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.1
1
0.9
0.8
0.7
40 40
.
40 50
.
-
.
.
( : )12
.
.
.
-7
=<1
=<2
=<3
=<4
-6
.
.
.
60
.
:
.
=<5
=<6
=<7
=<9
=<8
=<10
.
) )
1 1386 1 .1-11
=<11
ABSTRACT
Investigating underground structures stability
against Dynamic loads such as earthquake, projectile
impact, surface blast, landslide and etc is required, due
to their vital role in emergency conditions and more
stability than surface structures. its implicate analyzing
of explosion loads effects on this structures using
structure dynamic and determination of internal
dynamic forces. In the recent decades many researches
performed to recognization of underground structures
behavior against waves induced explosion by various
researchers, and those have been presented various
theories for explosive loading analysis. In most studies
performing by researchers, Much effort has been
focused on investigating dynamic response of tunnels
against projectile, rockets, missiles explosive loading,
and less attention has been spent effects of surface
blasts. Thus, in this paper, the surface blast effects of a
10 ton TNT explosive on a tunnel located in a weak and
jointed rock medium has been simulated. Primarily, The
scaled distance (Z0), peak blast pressure (Pso), arrival
time (tA), blast duration (t0) was calculated via empirical
diagrams providing by USA army, and applied on the
model as input. Finally, the wave pressure propagation
through the weak and jointed rock medium was
investigated. Optimal depth to tunnel stability against
surface blast, than, has been determined Based on
displacements induced in tunnel lining. In the present
study, the numerical analysis are carried out using a
KEYWORDS: Surface brust, optimal depth, plastic zone, weak rock mass, Blast wave.
9