BELIZE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE A.D. 2012

CASE REVIEW

Claim No. ________________

BETWEEN

CLARENCE D. SLUSHER

CLAIMANT

ATTORNEY GENERAL
DEFENDANT

1ST

BELIZE POLICE DEPARTMENT

DEFENDANT

2ND

RELIEF REQUESTED

An injunction to stay any further damage by course of action by

the defendants

Damages, Costs and any other relief the Court may deem fit.

STATEMENT OF CLAIM

BELIZE

Complainant:
1. The Claimant, claims that he was detained without
reasonable cause and was imprisoned falsely depriving him
of his constitutionally guaranteed right to liberty.
2. The Claimant claims he is the subject of the Tort of False
Imprisonment
3. _____________________________________________________________
4. _____________________________________________________________
5. _____________________________________________________________
6. _____________________________________________________________

Defendant:
The Defendant(s) claim that

FACTS
Factual statements relevant to the claim go here

ISSUES
Complainant is claiming defendant wounded and harmed
him with a cement block contrary to eyewitness statements.

CITATIONS FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW

Winfield and Jolowicz on Tort (17th Edn) (2006) (pg 99-100)

BELIZE

Hussein v Chong Fook Kam

Gilbert Hyde v A.G. et al Supreme Court Claim no. 88 of
2009 (unreported) Dec. 22nd 2010
Thompson v Commissioner of Police Quantum of Damages
Gilbert Hyde v A.G. et al Calculation of Damages

HOLDINGS

THEREFORE JUDGMENT FOR

REASONING
1. ____________________________________________________
2. ____________________________________________________