Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Report Aakash
Report Aakash
Submitted By
CERTIFICATE
I do certify that this report explains the work carried out by me in the course CED 411 Project Part 1 and CED 412 - Project Part 2 under the overall supervision of Dr. Suresh Bhalla. The contents of the report including text, figures, tables, computer programs, etc. have not been reproduced from other sources such as books, journals, reports, manuals, websites, etc. Wherever limited reproduction from another source had been made, the source had been duly acknowledged at that point and also listed in the References.
CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that the report submitted by Mr. Aakash Kushwaha (2008CE10238) describes the work carried out by him in the course CED 411 Project Part 1 and CED 412 Project Part 2 under my overall supervision.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I would like to express my sincere thanks & gratitude to Dr. Suresh Bhalla for his invaluable guidance, constant supervision and continuous encouragement during the course of this project. His knowledge, timely guidance and valuable suggestions and constant motivation at each step of the project has been instrumental in its completion I would like to take this opportunity to thank the entire staff at Structures Laboratory, Workshop and the Civil Engineering Laboratory for their cooperation and assistance in the lab-work that was required for this project. I would also like to thank my friends Deepti Chauhan, Ankit Saxena, Akash Rathi, Anubhav Kumar, Sudatta Mohanty and Vibhav Bisht for their help during the course of this project.
ABSTRACT
Bamboo is a non characterized and non validated material which is readily available in rural areas in India and has great scope as a building material. It has excellent strength under tension and compression and can used for construction purpose almost exclusively as well as with reinforced concrete and has many other applications. The objective of this part of the major project was to construct a bamboo based geodesic dome of 6 m diameter to cover with a net, to put load at the bottom joints and to obtain the joint stability of the bamboo. The bamboo used for the fabrication of dome is from Assam. The joints are made strong after the testing. The tension testing and compression testing were conducted on the samples. When 2 nodes are between the joint and the edge, the shear stress observed is greater than the case when no node is between the joint and the edge. Also the compressive strength of the bamboo with a node is greater than the bamboo sample without node. Thus the thickness of the bamboo and the position of node play an important role in the construction of dome. . The dome can be used by the rural community for various purposes and being dismountable, it can be carried to various places. The dome is constructed of only bamboo struts which make it affordable to everyone.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE CERTIFICATES..1 ACKNOWLEDGMENT..3 ABSTRACT.4 TABLE OF CONTENTS ....5 LIST OF FIGURES 7 LIST OF TABLES ..9 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION..10 1.1 About Bamboo.....11 1.2 Bamboo in India...13 1.3 Properties of Bamboo..13 1.3.1 Shrinking and Swelling.... 13 1.3.2 Tension parallel to grain...... 13 1.3.3 Bending........ 13 1.3.4 Elasticity.......14 1.3.5 Fire Resistance .... 14 1.4 Comparison. 14 1.5 Bamboo Used ..... 14 CHAPTER 2: BAMBOO APPLICATIONS ... 15 2.1 Housing/Construction......... 16 2.2 Bamboo Trusses..... 16 2.3 Bamboo Roof Skeleton.. 17 2.4 Scaffoldings17 CHAPTER 3: CONSTRUCTION OF GEODESIC DOME .. 18 3.1 Geodesic Dome19 3.2 Engineering Consideration... ...19 3.3 Perfect and imperfect solutions.... ...20 3.4 Strut Lengths........22 3.5 Joint .23 3.6 Connector.....24 3.7 Net....29 3.8 Loads at the joints....30 CHAPTER 4: TENSION TESTING OF JOINTS .. 35 4.1 Tension Testing of Joints ....36 4.1.1. Tension Testing of Dome 1.... 37 4.1.2. Tension Testing of Dome 2 38 4.2 Compression Testing ..... 40 CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS.. 43 5.1 Conclusion.. 44
5
5.2 Recommendations... 45 5.3 Materials required making a geodesic dome...45 REFERENCES.... 47 APPENDIX...... 52
LIST OF FIGURES
Page Fig. 1.1 Assam Bamboo.... 14 Fig. 2.1 Bamboo Housing. 16 Fig. 2.2 Bamboo Truss.. 16 Fig. 2.3 Bamboo Roof Skeleton.... 17 Fig. 2.4 Scaffolding... 17 Fig. 3.1 6V Geodesic Dome.. 19 Fig. 3.2 Platonic Solids. 20 Fig. 3.3 Uniform Triangle Subdivision. 20 Fig. 3.4 3V, 4V and 5V Domes.... 21 Fig. 3.5 2V Dome and Sphere... 21 Fig. 3.6 Assembly diagram... 22 Fig. 3.7 Joint in Dome 1... 23 Fig. 3.8 Joint in Dome 2... 23 Fig. 3.9 Bamboo Strut in Dome 2..... 24 Fig. 3.10 Connector....... 24 Fig. 3.11 Pentagon.... 24 Fig. 3.12 4-way connector for Dome 1. 25 Fig. 3.13 4-way connector for Dome 2. 25 Fig. 3.14 5-way connector for Dome 1. 25 Fig. 3.15 5-way connector for Dome 2. 25 Fig. 3.16 6-way connector for Dome 1. 26 Fig. 3.17 6-way connector for Dome 2. 26 Fig. 3.18 Assembly of Dome ... 27 Fig. 3.19 Dome 1.. 28 Fig. 3.20 Dome 2 ..... 28 Fig. 3.21 Parts of assembly diagram .... 29 Fig. 3.22 Assembly diagram .... 29 Fig. 3.23 Clamp ... 30 Fig. 3.24 Metal Plate ... 30
7
Fig. 3.25 Dome with load on a joint .... 32 Fig. 3.26 Leveled ground after keeping the load at the joint .. 33 Fig. 3.27 Geodesic Dome 1 with Net ... 33 Fig. 3.28 Dome 1 & Dome 2..... 34 Fig. 4.1 Tension Test.... 36 Fig. 4.2 Test 1 .. 37 Fig. 4.3 Test 2... 37 Fig. 4.4 Test 3 ...... 37 Fig. 4.5 Test 4... 37 Fig. 4.6 Joints of Dome 1 and Dome 2.... 38 Fig. 4.7 Tension Testing of Dome 2. 39 Fig. 4.8 Compression Testing Machine ... 40 Fig. 4.9 After Compression Test.. 41 Fig. 4.10 Load vs. Displacement ..... 42 Fig. 4.11 Stress vs. Strain..... 42 Fig. 4.12 Tension Testing of Dome 2... 28 Fig. 4.13 Compression Testing Machine ..... 29 Fig. 5.1 Deformed joints... 44 Fig. 5.2 One node between joint and the edge . 44 Fig. 5.3 L-strip ..... 44 Fig. 5.4 I-Bolt ... 46 Fig. 5.5 Nut & Bolt ...... 46 Fig. 5.6 Washer and Nut... 46 Fig. 5.7 Connector .... 46
LIST OF TABLES Page TABLE 1.1 Various uses of bamboo ... 12 TABLE 1.2 Comparison of Bamboo and Other Materials... 14 TABLE 4.1 Tension testing of Dome 1.... 38 TABLE 4.2 Tension testing of Dome 2.... 40 TABLE 4.3 Compression testing ..... 41 TABLE 5.1 Materials required for making geodesic dome ... 47
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
10
Table 1-1 Various uses of bamboo [Gielis, 2002] Typically, species like dendrocallamus giganteus (DG) have tensile strength of about 120 MPa, compressive strength of 55 MPa and Youngs modulus of 14 GPa. Mild steel has an ultimate strength of 410 MPa, yield strength of 250 MPa and Youngs modulus of 20 GPa. Concrete has much lower strength than those of bamboo reported here. In addition, the low density of bamboo, which is typically 700 kg/m3, results in much higher strength to weight ratio as compared to steel (density = 7800 kg/m3) and concrete (density= 2400 kg/m3). Bamboo offers competitive strength to mass ratio. It is free from corrosion and is very light. Besides, bamboo costs just six per cent of the price of steel. The only shortcoming with raw bamboo is susceptibility to termite attack which can be set aside by suitable chemical treatment [Bhalla et al., 2008].
12
1.3.3 BENDING
The bending is an important parameter, deciding the suitability of Bamboo as a construction material. Because of this ability Bamboo can be used as a substitute for reinforcement in construction of buildings [Hearn, 1997].
13
1.3.4 ELASTICITY
The enormous elasticity of bamboo makes it to a very good building material for earthquake endangered areas. Another advantage of bamboo is its low weight. It can be transported and worked easily, thus rendering use of cranes and other big machines unnecessary [Bamboo as a building material, 2002].
1.4 COMPARISON
The comparison between bamboo and various materials in terms of various parameters is as appended below in the form of a chart.
TABLE 1.2 Comparisons of Bamboo and Other Materials [Janssen, J.A., 2000]
CHAPTER 2
BAMBOO APPLICATIONS
15
2.1 HOUSING/CONSTRUCTION
The construction materials for building a bamboo house should be readily available and accessible. Traditionally used construction materials are considered. The bamboo based house has a very low weight therefore foundations can be minimized. Fig. 2.1 (a) displays a typical bamboo house. The structure in Fig. 2.1 (b) is built in a tropical area with no end walls and using untreated bamboo.
16
2.4 SCAFFOLDINGS
Because of the favorable relationship between load-bearing capacity and weight, bamboo can be used for the construction of safe scaffoldings even for very tall buildings. The cane extension is carried out by lashing the cane ends together with several ties. The ties are arranged so that force acting vertically downwards wedges the nodes in the lashing. With larger cane diameters the friction can be increased by tightening the rope between the canes. This technique has great advantage that the joints can be re-tensioned to the right degree without difficulty and also quickly released again.
CHAPTER 3
18
Fig. 3.1 6V Geodesic Dome Figure 3.1 illustrates a fairly complex version of a dome which is composed of small triangles that are approximately equal, and such that the vertices of the triangles all lay on the surface of a hemisphere.
polygons, they can flex if the connections at the ends are not completely rigid. If the pieces, for example, are just connected with a bolt through a number of struts, it is almost impossible to make the joints rigid. But if the structure is completely composed of triangles, it can be made completely rigid, even if the individual joints are not. One final engineering consideration is that if the triangles of which the structure is composed are all as close to equilateral triangles as possible, then the stresses will be approximately the same on all the struts, so there is very little wasted strength. Finally, in very large structures, it is a bad idea to have very long unsupported struts. [Davis, T., 2011]
Fig. 3.2 Platonic Solids These so-called platonic solids are approximations to the sphere, but only the icosahedron is very close, and to make a large structure from it would require very long struts.
20
One way to proceed is simply to subdivide the triangles in one of the regular platonic solids, and this is how a geodesic dome is constructed. Any of the three solids could be used, but there are some serious problems if this is done beginning with a tetrahedron, and less-serious problems (but problems, nonetheless) if begun with an octahedron. The standard construction of domes of various complexities is begun with icosahedron. It is easy to subdivide an equilateral triangle into 4, 9, 16, or any perfect square number of subtriangles, as is illustrated in Fig. 3.3. But if the triangles of icosahedron are subdivided, although the vertices of the original icosahedron will lie on the surface of a sphere, the vertices that are needed to add to subdivide the triangles will lie in the planes of those triangles and will be physically inside the sphere.
Fig. 3.4 3V, 4V and 5V Domes The names, 3V, 4V and 5V refer to the number of subdivisions that are made to the original triangles in the icosahedron before they are pushed out to the surface of the sphere. The 3V and the 5V domes are slightly larger than a half sphere because when there are an odd number of triangles in the subdivision, there is no center line or equator at which to divide it, so the version that is a little larger or a little smaller than a half sphere is picked.
Fig. 3.5 The 2V Dome and Sphere All the domes displayed in Fig. 3.4 are fairly complicated to build; the easiest that can reasonably be called a geodesic dome is the 2V version. Fig. 3.5 displays the 2V dome (a halfsphere) and the corresponding 2V sphere [Davis, T., 2011].
21
Strut Factor for strut A = 0.618 [Davis, T., 2011] Strut Factor for strut B = 0.546 [Davis, T., 2011] Length of strut A = Radius of Dome * Strut FactorA = 3 * 0.618 = 1.85 m [Davis, T., 2011] Length of strut B = Radius of Dome * Strut FactorB = 3 * 0.546 = 1.64 m [Davis, T., 2011]
3.5 JOINT
The materials required in making a joint are as follows:1. Bolt 2. 3 Nuts 3. I-Bolt 4. 3 Circular Strip 5. 2 L-strip Fig. 3.7 describes the fabrication of joint in Dome 1. It consists of I-Bolt of diameter 5 mm, Lstrip of thickness 1 mm, 1 washer and 2 nuts.
Fig. 3.7 Joint in Dome 1 Fig. 3.8 describes the fabrication of joint in Dome 2. In this joint, the diameter of I-Bolt is increased to 7 mm. The diameter of bolt is also increased to 7.5 mm. The thickness of strip is also increased to 2 mm. The position of I-Bolt with respect to the L-strips is also changed so that when these joints are connected with the connector, deflections would be less which will increase the stability of dome.
Fig. 3.9 shows the Bamboo strut A of length of 1.85 m (185 cm) with both the joints at the end. One strut has 2 joints.
Fig. 3.9 Bamboo Strut in Dome 2 So, Total no. of bamboo struts = No. of bamboo strut A + No. of bamboo strut B = 35 + 30 = 65 Also, Total no. of joints = 65 * 2 = 130
3.6 CONNECTOR
Fig. 3.10 shows the connector which is used to connect the bamboo struts to fabricate the dome.
Fig. 3.10 Connector The struts are first arranged to form a pentagon as shown in Fig. 3.11. Similarly, 5 more pentagons are made.
The 5 pentagon structures are placed near each other in a circle and sixth pentagon is placed above these pentagons connecting each vertex of the sixth pentagon with top vertex of the bottom 5 pentagons. Finally, the bases of these pentagons are connected with a strut. Thus, there are 3 types of connectors in the dome:1. 4-way connector It connects the bases of the pentagon as shown in the Fig. 3.12 & Fig. 3.13. There are 5 bases to be connected, so the total no. of 4-way connector is 10.
2. 5-way connector It is at the centre of each pentagon as shown in the Fig. 3.14 & Fig. 3.15. There are 6 pentagons, so the total no. of 5-way connector is 6.
3. 6-way connector 5 connectors connects the base pentagons with each other and 5 more connectors connect the base pentagons with the pentagon at the top as shown in the Fig. 3.16 & Fig. 3.17. So, the total no. of 6-way connector is 10.
25
Thus, the total no. of connectors is 26 (10 + 6 +10). The difference between the connections of Dome 1 and Dome 2 can be easily seen in the above figures. The connection in Dome 2 is very strong which increases its stability and helps to withstand against the force of the wind. Fig. 3.18 shows the stepwise process to fabricate the dome. Fig. 3.19 and Fig. 3.20 show the complete view of Dome 1 and Dome 2 respectively.
26
27
3.7 NET
A Net with a porosity of 10% is used to cover the dome. To fix the net to the dome, clamps and staple pins are used. Staple pins are pierced into the bamboo using staple guns. In the dome, there are 2 types of triangles with different area as shown in Fig. 3.21. There are 10 Type 1 triangles and 30 Type 2 triangles in the dome as shown in Fig. 3.22.
Fig. 3.22 Assembly diagram The calculation of area of net is as follows:Area of Type 1 = 3 / 4 * (A)2 = 3/4 * (1.85)2 = 1.48 m2 Area of Type 2 = A / 4 * (4*B A )= 1.85 / 4 * (4*1.64 1.85 ) = 1.25 m Area of net required = Surface Area of Dome = Area of all triangles = 10 * Area of Type 1 + 30 * Area of Type 2 From (1) and (2) = 10 * 1.48 + 30 * 1.25 = 52.3 m2 ~ 55 m2
2 2 2 2 2
(1) (2)
29
To fix the net with the bamboo, 2 clamps have been clamped on each bamboo strut as shown in Fig. 3.23. Therefore, Total no. of clamps = 2 * 65 = 130
Fig. 3.23 Clamp Also, 4 staple pins are punched on each bamboo strut. Therefore, Total no. of staple pins = 4 * 65 = 260
Fig. 3.24 Metal Plate As the no. of joints at the base of the dome is 10, so 10 metal strips are required to be connected. Each metal strip is connected to the joint at the base of the dome using the same 4-way connector.
30
Using IS 875 (part III), the load will be equivalent to the wind load acting in the direction normal to the individual structural element F = ( Cpe Cpi ) A pd Cpe = external pressure coefficient = 1.2 Cpi = internal pressure coefficient = 0.6 A = surface area of structural element or cladding unit, and pd = design wind pressure. A = 2 * * r2 = 2 * 3.14 * 32 = 56.52 m2 pd = 0.6 Vz2 Where Vz = design wind velocity in m/s at height z. Vz = k 1 * k 2 * k 3 * Vb Where k1 = probability factor (risk coefficient) k2 = terrain, height and structure size factor k3 = topography factor Vz = 1.05 * 1 * 1 * 47 = 49.5 m/s Substitute (6) in (5) Therefore, pd = 0.6 * 49.52 = 1470.15 N/m2 Safety Factor = 1.2 Substitute (4) and (7) in (3) F = 1.2 * 1/3 * (1.2 0.6) * 52.15 * 1470.15 = 15333.66 N As there are 10 joints, so load at one joint = F/10 = 1533.36 N So, mass on one metal plate = 1533.36 / 9.8 = 156.46 kg (7) (6) (4) (5) (3)
31
So, a pit of length 1 m, breadth 0.5 m and height 0.5 m is dug. Then the load of 165 kg is put using 3 sandbags, each weighing 55 kg as shown in Fig. 3.25. Similarly the same load is put on the rest of the joints.
Fig. 3.25 Dome with load on a joint Fig 3.26 shows the leveled ground after keeping the load at the joint and Fig. 3.27 shows the complete dome with net and the load at the joints.
32
Metal joint
Fig. 3.26 Leveled ground after keeping the load at the joint
33
34
CHAPTER 4
TESTING OF JOINTS
35
36
Result Failuredueto strip Failureof Bamboodue tothickstrip Failureof bamboodue tothickstrip Failureof jointdueto locationof node betweenthe jointandthe edge
26.5
10.5
40
4709
58.86
27.5
13
7.25
36.25
7848
108.25
Fig. 4.6 Joints of Dome 1 and Dome 2 After the test of Dome 1, the joint is modified with the increased diameter of bolt & I-bolt and thickness of L-strip. For the testing purposes, to avoid the strip failure or joint failure, the joint should be welded so that the final result will be due to the failure of bamboo. The tension testing consists of 3 parts:a) 3 specimens without the node in between the joint and the edge. b) 3 specimens with only one node in between the joint and the edge. c) 3 specimens with both the nodes in between the joint and the edge.
38
The maximum shear stress observed when the node is not between the joint and the edge is 49.4 MPa. The bamboo can be failed on either side as shown in Fig. 4.7. When one node is between the joint and the edge, the maximum shear stress observed is 80.8 MPa. In this type of sample, the bamboo is failed at the edge where joint is without node as shown in Fig. 4.7. When 2 nodes are between the joint and the edge, the maximum shear stress is increased to 108.40 MPa. The bamboo can be failed on either side as shown in Fig. 4.7. The summary of the testing can be seen in Table 4.2.
39
S. No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Node between jointand edge Without Node Without Node Without Node Withone node Withone node Withone node Withtwo nodes Withtwo nodes Withtwo nodes
Outer Inner Thickness Diameter Diameter (mm) (mm) (mm) 42.4 32.6 37.3 40.4 36.7 38.7 37.5 39.7 39.3 16.9 23.6 24.8 24.4 24.7 22.2 28.5 26.2 26.3 12.8 4.5 6.3 8.0 6.0 8.3 4.5 6.8 6.5
Diameter ofBolt (mm) 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5
Area (mm2) 95.6 33.8 46.9 60.0 45.0 61.9 33.8 50.6 48.8
Load (N) 4116.0 3332.0 4214.0 8428.0 6860.0 9996.0 6664.0 10976.0 8624.0
Stress (MPa) 21.5 49.4 45.0 70.2 76.2 80.8 98.7 108.4 88.5
Result Bamboo Failed Bamboo Failed Bamboo Failed Bamboo Failed Bamboo Failed Bamboo Failed Bamboo Failed Bamboo Failed Bamboo Failed
4.1.3
Compression Testing
40
In the compression testing we have taken 4 samples. The rate of loading is constant at 0.1 mm/sec. The loading rate for concrete is 1.4 mm/sec. As there is no prescribed loading rate, so we conducted the experiment at 0.1 mm/sec. Sample 1 & Sample 3 are of same bamboo strut and sample 2 & sample 4 are of different bamboo strut. Sample 1 & Sample 2 do not have node and Sample 3 & Sample 4 have node. In sample 1, the peak load is 59.8 kN. In sample 3, the peak load in 71 kN which is due to the presence of the node. Similarly, in sample 2, the peak load in 75.4 kN and in sample 4, the peak load is increased to 80 kN. The samples after the test are shown in Fig. 4.9. Avg. Diameter = sqrt (3.14 * (Do2 Di2)) Where Do = Outer Diameter Di = Inner Diameter
41
From the tests, the graphs of Load vs. Displacement (Fig. 4.10), Stress vs. Strain (Fig. 4.11), Displacement vs. Time (Fig. 4.12) and Load vs. Time (Fig. 4.13) are drawn.
CHAPTER 5
43
5.1 CONCLUSION
Geodesic Dome 1 has been constructed with net covering and metal plate has been attached to the joints for the stability of the dome. While testing the joints of Dome 1, when the thin strip with thickness 1mm was used, the joint failed and the shear stress came out to be 19.62 MPa. Then the thickness of strip is increased to 2mm which resulted in the failure of bamboo with a bearing stress of 29.07 MPa & 29.43 MPa for two joints. Also, when the node is between the joint and the edge in which, the joint failed proved that node of the bamboo can take up large amount of loads as the bearing stress went up to 54.12 MPa. However some joints have been deformed either due to wind or dead load.
Fig. 5.1 Deformed joints In the construction of Dome 2, the size of I bolt and bolt is increased from 5 mm to 7 mm and the thickness of the strip is also increased from 1 mm to 2 mm which increase the strength of the joint. The position of I-Bolt is set in the joint to restrict the movement of the joint which ultimately reduced the deforming tendency of the structure. The maximum shear stress observed when the node is not between the joint and the edge is 49.36 MPa. When one node is between the joint and the edge, the maximum shear stress observed is 80.78 MPa. When 2 nodes are between the joint and the edge, the maximum shear stress is increased to 108.40 MPa. The compressive strength of the bamboo with a node is greater than the bamboo sample without node.
44
Thus, the thickness of bamboo and the position of node play an important role in the construction of dome. In some of the bamboo struts, it is tried to put node between the joint and edge as it would result in greater shear stress.
5.2 RECOMMENDATIONS
1. As it is not possible to find a bamboo strut with a particular length having both the nodes between the joint and the edge, therefore only one node should be between the joint and the edge. .
Fig. 5.2 One node between joint and the edge 2. While testing, I-Bolt should be welded with the rest of the pieces to avoid failure of joint. 3. Instead of 2 L-strips, we can use 1 U-strip. 4. The strip should have a minimum thickness of 2mm else the joint would fail. 5. The bamboo should not be too hollow which may lead to failure of bamboo in short time.
5.3
1. Bamboo Strut a. Length of Strut A = 1.85m. (# 35),Outer Diameter = 4 cm, Thickness = 1.5 cm b. Length of Strut B = 1.64 m (# 30), Outer Diameter = 4 cm, Thickness = 1.5 cm 2. L strips 2 mm thickness (# 260),
S.No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Length
Diameter
StrutA 1.85m 4cm(outer) StrutB 1.64m 4cm(outer) Lstrips 10cm 4cm(width) Ibolt 8cm 7mm Bolt 7cm 7.5mm Nut 7.5mm Washer 7mm(inner) Connector 6cm 1.5cm
47
REFERENCES
48
1. Aziz, M.A. (1995),Engineering Materials, Z and Z Computer and Printers, Dhaka, Bangladesh, p. 65. 2. Azmy, H.M. (1989), Venture on the Making of Fish or Vegetable and Charcaoal Baskets, Forest Research Institute, Kepong, p. 8. 3. Bamboo as a building material (2002), http://bambus.rwth-aachen.de/eng/PDF-
Files/Bamboo%20as%20a%20building%20material.pdf, University of Aachen, Germany 4. BAMBOO FOR INTEGRATED RURAL DEVELOPMENT (2008),
http://www.keralaagriculture.gov.in/htmle/bankableagriprojects/fw/Bamboo.htm 5. Bhalla, S., Gupta, S., Puttaguna, S. and Suresh, R. (2008), Bamboo as Green Alternative to Concrete and Steel for Modern Structures, Journal of Environmental Research and Development, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 362-370. 6. Building materials (2005), http://www.staff.city.ac.uk/earthquakes/Bamboo/Bamboo.htm# Fifth. 7. Davis, T. 2011, "Geodesic Dome", http://www.geometer.org/mathcircles/geodesic.pdf 8. DeBoer, D., Bareis, K., Bamboo building and culture- the architecture of Simon Velez, architect, Bogota, Colombia. 9. Fateh, M. (1931), The bamboo forest of Hoshiarpur District Punjab, Indian Forester, No. 26, pp. 491-510. 10. Geodesic Dome, Soulvisuals, http://soulvisuals.com/glossary/geodesic-domes.html 11. Geodesic Dome, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geodesic_dome
49
12. Gielis, J., (2002), Future possibilities for bamboo in European agriculture - Oprins Plant Sint-Lenaartsesteenweg, 91 B-2310 Rijkevorsel. . 13. Ghavami, K. (2005), Cement and Concrete Composites, Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages 637649. 14. Hearn, E.J. (1997), Mechanics of materials - An introduction to the mechanics of elastic and plastic deformation of solids and structural materials (third edition). University of Warwick, U.K. Butterworth, Heinemann. 15. IS 456 16. IS 875 (Part 3) 17. Janssen, J.A. Eindhoven University, The Netherlands 18. Janssen, J.A. (1995), Building with bamboo (second edition), Intermediate Technology Publication Limited, London. pp. 65. 19. Liese, W. (1985), Biology Biology, Silvics Properties, Utilization, Eschborn 20. Liese, W., (1987), Research on bamboo, Wood Sci. Technol., 21(3):189-209, ISSN: 00437719 (Print) 1432-5225 (Online), DOI 10.1007/BF00351391. 21. Limaye, V.D. (1952), Strength of bamboo (Dendrocalamus strictus), Indian Forest Records. 1(1):1-17. 22. Mahzuz, H. M. A., Ahmed, M., Ashrafuzzaman M., Karim, R. and Ahmed, R. (2011), "Performance evaluation of bamboo with mortar and concrete", Journal of Engineering and Technology Research, Vol. 3, No 12 (Nov), pp. 342 350.
50
23. Monitor CS (2008). http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/0312/p14s01-stgn.html. 24. National Status Report on Forests and Forestry in India, (Survey and Utilization Division) Ministry of Environments & Forests, Government of India, New Delhi, September 2006 25. Numata, M. (1979), The structure and succession of bamboo vegetation, in Numata, M. (Ed.), Ecology of Grasslands and Bamboo Lands in the World, Kluwer, The Hague, pp. 22236. 26. Razak, A., Latif, M., Liese, W. and Norini., H. (1995), Planting and utilization of bamboo in Peninsular Malaysia, Research Pamphlet, Forest Research Institute Malaysia. 27. Rawat, J.K., Khanduri, D.C., THE STATUS OF BAMBOO AND RATTAN IN INDIA 28. Scurlock, J.M.O, Dayton, D.C. and Hame, B. (2000). Bamboo: an overlooked biomass resource? Biomass and Bio-energy, 19(4): 229-244. 29. Shyamasundar, K., Vengala, J. (2007), Promotion of bamboo Housing system & Recent Developments, IPIRTI, INDIA 30. Tan, T., Rahbar, N., Allameh, S.M., Kwofie, S., Dissmore, D., Ghavami, K. and Soboyejo, W.O. (2011), Advances in Silicic Acid Research and Application, Acton, Q. A., 2011 31. Tewari, D.N. (1992), A monograph on bamboo. International Book Distribution, DehraDun (India). 32. Tommy, Y., Lo, H.Z., Cui, P.W.C., Tang, H.C. and Leung, H. (2008), Construction and Building Materials, Volume 22, Issue 7, Pages 1532-1535 33. Wong, K.M. (1989), Current and potential uses of bamboo in Peninsular Malaysia, Journal of American Bamboo Society, Vol. 7 No. 172, pp. 1-15.
51
34. Xiao, Y., Inoue, M. and Paudel, S.K., Modern Bamboo Structures 35. Xuhe, C., Zheng, W., Lobovikov, M., Liang, C., and Li, G., "Preliminary study on the manufacture of bamboo panel components for prefabricated house" 36. Zu, L., Koussios, S. and Beukers, A. (2010), Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, Volume 41, Issue 9, Pages 1312-1320.
52
APPENDIX
53
54
CompressionTestSample1 Data Time Load Displacement Point (Sec) (kN) (mm) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 4.6 7.9 11.7 15.7 19.8 23.3 26.7 30 32.8 34.2 36.6 39.3 42.2 45.4 48.2 51 53.7 56.5 58.7 59.8 59.6 58.8 57.8 56.7 55.1 52.9 50.8 49.6 49.2 49 0.077 0.166 0.281 0.397 0.507 0.621 0.728 0.842 0.945 0.997 1.087 1.179 1.27 1.363 1.456 1.546 1.642 1.734 1.828 1.921 2.01 2.101 2.188 2.279 2.374 2.468 2.562 2.66 2.758 2.858
55
CompressionTestSample2 Data Time Load Point (Sec) (kN) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 0.07 0.13 0.19 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.44 0.49 0.53 0.58 0.63 0.67 0.72 0.77 0.82 0.87 0.91 0.96 1.01 1.05 1.1 1.15 1.19 1.24 1.29 1.33 1.38 1.42 1.47 1.52 1.56 1.61 1.66 1.71 1.74 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 Displacement (mm) 4.1 5.7 7.6 9.3 11.3 13 15.2 17.1 19 21.1 23 25 26.8 28.8 30.4 32.1 33.4 34.7 35.9 37.1 38.3 39.5 40.9 42.1 43.4 44.7 46.1 47.5 48.8 50.1 51.6 53.1 54.4 55.8 57.2 57.7 Data Time Load Point (Sec) (kN) 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 1.79 1.83 1.88 1.92 1.96 2.01 2.06 2.1 2.15 2.2 2.25 2.29 2.34 2.38 2.43 2.47 2.52 2.57 2.61 2.66 2.71 2.76 2.81 2.85 2.9 2.94 2.99 3.04 3.09 3.13 3.18 3.23 3.25 3.3 3.35 3.4 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 Displacement (mm) 58.9 60.2 61.2 62.6 63.5 64.5 65.9 66.9 68.2 68.9 69.8 70.6 71.3 71.9 72.5 73 73.8 74 74.4 74.6 74.9 75 75.2 75.4 75.4 75.3 75.3 75.2 75.1 74.7 74.7 74.4 74.3 74 73.6 73.1
56
CompressionTestSample3 Data Time Load Displacement Point (Sec) (kN) (mm) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 4.4 5.7 7.3 9.2 11.5 14.1 17.1 20.7 24.3 28.1 31.8 35.7 40 44.7 49.8 55.1 60.1 65.2 69.1 71 70.9 69.8 68 66.2 64 61.2 58.7 56.6 55 53.9 53 51.9 50.6 0.146 0.239 0.334 0.42 0.508 0.589 0.672 0.76 0.847 0.94 1.027 1.116 1.204 1.294 1.379 1.463 1.545 1.633 1.726 1.812 1.851 1.946 2.057 2.177 2.298 2.419 2.531 2.63 2.731 2.837 2.938 3.032 3.133
CompressionTestSample4 Data Time Load Displacement Point (Sec) (kN) (mm) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 3.7 5.5 7.9 10.8 14.8 19.1 23.9 28.8 33.9 39.2 44.7 50.5 56.3 62 67.4 72 75.3 77.3 78.1 78.6 79 79.4 79.6 79.8 79.9 79.9 80 79.8 79.9 79.8 79.9 79.6 79.5 79.3 78.7 78.3 77.4 0.094 0.189 0.288 0.396 0.512 0.621 0.723 0.827 0.93 1.029 1.133 1.227 1.328 1.427 1.533 1.645 1.758 1.877 1.985 2.088 2.187 2.281 2.365 2.452 2.547 2.64 2.73 2.821 2.913 3.001 3.092 3.187 3.28 3.37 3.47 3.56 3.656
57