Document including a hand-written letter to the Scottish justice secretary, Kenny MacAskill, from Abdel Basset Ali al-Megrahi, the man convicted of murder for the 1988 bombing of Pan Am Flight 103. The letter was released along with a batch of letters between British and Scottish officials discussing his case on Tuesday, September 1, 2009.
Document including a hand-written letter to the Scottish justice secretary, Kenny MacAskill, from Abdel Basset Ali al-Megrahi, the man convicted of murder for the 1988 bombing of Pan Am Flight 103. The letter was released along with a batch of letters between British and Scottish officials discussing his case on Tuesday, September 1, 2009.
Document including a hand-written letter to the Scottish justice secretary, Kenny MacAskill, from Abdel Basset Ali al-Megrahi, the man convicted of murder for the 1988 bombing of Pan Am Flight 103. The letter was released along with a batch of letters between British and Scottish officials discussing his case on Tuesday, September 1, 2009.
RESTRICTED ~ ADVICE TO MINISTERS.
Libyan Government
Note of meeting: Monday 6 July 2009, 14am
Attendees:
Cabinet Secretary for Justice
Robert Gordon, DG Justice and Communities
George Burgess, Deputy Director, Criminal Law and Licensing
Linda Miller, Criminal Law and Licensing
Linda Hamilton, PS / Cabinet Secretary
Mr Abdulati Alobidi, Minister for Europe
Mr Omar Jelban, Chargé d’Affaires, London
Mr Azzam Eddeeb, Judge
Mr Ismail, the Qaddafi, International Charity and Development Foundation
Mr Abdurahman Swessi, Libyan Consul General in Glasgow
Mr Emhmed Almarene, Interpreter
1. Mr MacAskill thanked Mr Alobidi and his delegation for coming to Edinburgh
to meet with him. He explained that as part of his process of considering the
application for transfer, submitted under the terms of the Prisoner Transfer
‘Agreement (PTA), he was listening to relevant representations. Mr MacAskill
indiciated that he had spoken with the US Attorney General and with
representatives from families of victims from the UK and would be having a video
conference with families of victims from the US later in the week. In addition,
Mr Al-Megrahi would be offered the opportunity to make his representations. Mr
MacAskill stressed that he is listening to representations and could not give any
indication as to his decision, as he would not be making a decision until he had
heard and considered all representations.
2. _ Mr Alobidi thanked Mr MacAskill for the opportunity to present their views.
Mr Alobidi spoke of the respect that the Libyan Government has always had for
the Scottish judicial system they had followed all procedures and process as
directed by Scots law. Mr Alobidi spoke of the Libyan Government's co-operation
throughout the trial, and following the process of appeal and review by the
Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission (SCCRC). He spoke of the
compensation that the Libyan Government paid to the families of victims.
3. Mr Alobidi spoke of Mr Al-Megrahi's diagnosis of prostate cancer in
September 2008, and of Mr Al-Megrahi’s application to the Court for interim
liberation, which was rejected in November 2008,
4, Mr Alobidi confirmed that it was based on this humanitarian aspect that they
submitted their application for transfer of Mr Al-Megrahi to Libya under the terms
of the PTA. Mr Alobidi stated that he has a signed undertaking from Mr Al-
Megrahi that, if he were to be granted transfer, he would abandon his appeal.
"1RESTRICTED — ADVICE TO MINISTERS
5. Mr Alobidi noted that they had responded promptly to the questions from the
Scottish Government on their application and assured Mr MacAskil that the
Libyan Government would undertake all commitments within the PTA.
6. Mr Alobidi commented on the past agreement about place of sentence and
said that this was now not relevant due to the agreement of the PTA.
7. Mr Alobidi continued that they had submitted their application at this point as
doctors were of the opinion that Mr Al-Megrahi had only a few months remaining,
and he asked for a decision as soon as possible.
8. Mr MacAskill responded that the ill health of Mr Al-Megrahi was not in
dispute. He gave an assurance that, for as long as he is in the care of the
Scottish Prison Service, he would receive the best medical treatment but he
accepted that an exact prognosis is beyond medical science and that mental
well-being can affect prognosis.
9. Mr MacAskill went on to discuss the PTA and asked the Libyan Government
if their understanding, at the time of negotiations prior to the trial in the
Netherlands, was that if the accused were found guilty that they would serve their
sentence in Scotland.
10. Mr Alobidi explained that at that time the US would not talk with Libya and
so all negotiations were between the UK and Libya. Mr Edeeb confirmed that he
was part of the Libyan team during negotiations and that they had originally
requested the accused, if found guilty, to serve their sentence in Libya or at least
in another Muslim country or the Netherlands. However, the UK refused this,
request and the negotiations stalled for some time. Mr Edeeb continued that the
Libyan Government then agreed that, if convicted, the accused would serve their
sentence in Scotland. They included this in a letter to the UN but there was no
other agreement. He stressed that these negotiations had been between Libya
and the UK, and the US had not been party to them.
11. Mr Edeeb stated that there was no PTA at the time of the negotiations but,
even if there had been, there is nothing to stop two states entering into a new
agreement.
12. Mr Gordon asked if they felt that the US or the UN could have any
expectation that their agreement would be required in a case of a transfer. Mr
Edeeb replied that there was no formal agreement, simply the letter to the UN.
13. Mr MacAskill spoke of the representations that have been presented to him
by families of victims and that they wish that the appeal to continue. Mr MacAskill
confirmed that if, at the time of reaching a decision on the transfer application, the
appeal is in progress, the conditions in the PTA will not have been met and he
cannot agree to the application for transfer.
12RESTRICTED ~ ADVICE TO MINISTERS
14. On the separate issue of compassionate release, Mr MacAskill clarified that
Mr Al-Megrahi had previously applied to the Court for interim liberation and that is.
a separate process from compassionate release. He confirmed that this meeting
was to discuss the PTA but officials could give more information on
compassionate release.
15. Mr MacAskill also raised the concern that had been expressed to him by
some families that if Mr Al-Megrahi were returned to Libya, that he could be
greeted by some ‘fan fare’ in Libya and that this would be insensitive to families
of victims. Mr Alobidi responded to this point and confirmed that if Mr Al-Megrahi
were transferred that they would be upholding all the conditions in the PTA.
16. MrMacAskill concluded the meeting by confirming he would be speaking to
more family members during the week and would be offering Mr Al-Megrahi the
opportunity to make representations.
17. Mr Alobidi thanked Mr MacAskill for his time. He asked Mr MacAskill to
note, regarding his timing of his decision, that Ramadan would be in August and
that Mr Al-Megrahi would be observing Ramadan.
Close.
13