I will basically comment on your comparison -conclusion of your analysis of theses 1, 9 and then I will go further with thesis

6. First of all I disagree with you in these two points. 1. Thesis 6 does not have an introduction at all. 2. Thesis 9 has only a few mistakes. While you affirm that 6 dont have an introduction at all, I say that it has. I based my statement on the basic parts of an introduction found in such thesis. For example, in the last paragraph of the section Attitudes Towards BrE and AmE, we find the thesis statement of the topic. At, the beginning I was also a bit confused, but after reading twice I could recognize it. I think we might say that thesis does not count with a well organized nor structured introduction either but I could not affirm that it lacks of an introductory chapter. Furthermore, from your point of view thesis 9 does not have many mistakes. However, I found quite a few mistakes. First of all, the writer uses too much information, information that could be easily summarized and placed in only one section. She does not mention the aims of the research clearly either. I have also found sentences that are ambiguous and difficult to understand. Finally, I agree with you on your analysis of thesis 1. I also think that the author has quite few mistakes on the clarity, but almost all the authors have made the same mistakes. I think it is important to highlight those mistakes that can help us to avoid making the same mistakes when elaborating our thesis paper. However, from the theses I chose to analyse, I could understand this much easier than number 9. I would like to say that this tutorial has also taught me that I do not need to write difficult sentences in order to convey an idea. The more simple and clearer the sentence is, the nicest the reading is.