You are on page 1of 2

A-17

Overseas Bank v. Cordero (1982)

1956

Payment of Interest Not due when operation of a bank is suspended by authority, Central Bank

Private respondent opened a 1-year time deposit with petitioner bank amounting to P80,000, with interest of 6% p.a. Due to its distressed financial condition, the bank was unable to pay. Cordero instituted an action before the CFI Manila. Petitioner raised the defenses of insolvency and prejudice to other depositors. The lower court, and the Court of Appeals, ruled in favor of Cordero. Hence, the instant petition for review on certiorari. Certain supervening events rendered the issue moot and academic. Respondents brother and attorney-infact sent a letter to the Commercial Bank of Manila (petitioners successor-in-interest), acknowledging receipt of P10,000, and another manifestation for P73,840, with waiver of damages. Upon further examination, it was found that the respondents brother has no SPA. Respondents brother submitted the SPA, with explanatory comment that the waiver applies only to third party claims, suits and damages, not to interest

WON respondent is entitled to (1) interest on his time deposit during the period that petitioner was closed and (2) attorneys fee

NO The obligation to pay interest on the deposit CEASES THE MOMENT THE OPERATION OF THE BANK IS COMPLETELY SUSPENDED by the Central Bank. Neither can respondent Cordero recover attorneys fees. Petitioners refusal to pay was not due to a willful and dishonest refusal to comply with its obligation but to restrictions imposed by Central Bank.

and attorneys fees.

You might also like