This is an article that was published by Fidelity Magazine in June of 1991, the same month that Bishop Ottenweller published his conclusions to the Pastoral Visitation into the Sword of the Spirit Community: Servants of Christ the King.
It is one of the few published examples of Steven B Clark going public about his dispute with Ralph Martin and the following split in the Word of God Community (the main Branch of the Sword of the Spirit from which Servants had taken "formation and training" over more than a decade.)
After giving this interview, knowing it would be published, Clark snypes in a follow up letter (also included in this post) that "disputes among Christians should not be aired in public venues." One has to wonder why Mr Clark would give an interview published in a Magazine if he really feels this way.
Original Title
Schism in Word of God: Fidelity Magazine and the Clark/Martin Split
This is an article that was published by Fidelity Magazine in June of 1991, the same month that Bishop Ottenweller published his conclusions to the Pastoral Visitation into the Sword of the Spirit Community: Servants of Christ the King.
It is one of the few published examples of Steven B Clark going public about his dispute with Ralph Martin and the following split in the Word of God Community (the main Branch of the Sword of the Spirit from which Servants had taken "formation and training" over more than a decade.)
After giving this interview, knowing it would be published, Clark snypes in a follow up letter (also included in this post) that "disputes among Christians should not be aired in public venues." One has to wonder why Mr Clark would give an interview published in a Magazine if he really feels this way.
This is an article that was published by Fidelity Magazine in June of 1991, the same month that Bishop Ottenweller published his conclusions to the Pastoral Visitation into the Sword of the Spirit Community: Servants of Christ the King.
It is one of the few published examples of Steven B Clark going public about his dispute with Ralph Martin and the following split in the Word of God Community (the main Branch of the Sword of the Spirit from which Servants had taken "formation and training" over more than a decade.)
After giving this interview, knowing it would be published, Clark snypes in a follow up letter (also included in this post) that "disputes among Christians should not be aired in public venues." One has to wonder why Mr Clark would give an interview published in a Magazine if he really feels this way.
come =
Ags 2
Ag Ba noe e $2.50 (US)
PO bP ee:
Schisiv in Ani Arbors %,
Just Another Split?
or Reform for the Charismatics?Schism in Ann Arbor:
Just Another Split?
or Reform for the Charismatics?
by Thomas J. Nash
“I almost feel like I'm in recovery. You know, I
feel like I'm getting deprogrammed, or ed
or recovered. Like veils are being taken off. I'm see-
ing things in a way I haven't seen them before.”
Ralph Martin
Senior head coordinator of the
Word of God covenant community
Exuberant prayer and pride would characterize
a typical meeting of the Word of God (WOG), the
mother of all charismatic covenant comunities and
the engine which has driven the Catholic Charis-
matic Renewal for 20 years.
But this meeting was much different. Members
were crying tears of sorrow, not Joy. And instead of
issuing a ministerial admonition to repent and be-
lieve in the gospel, WOG leaders were cataloguing
their own “abuse of authority” and asking the mem-
bership for forgiveness.
In the past, WOG leaders had told the
organization's members that they were living the
ideal Christian life, “a deeper walik.” as some mem-
bers related it. “The Lord wants all his people to be
part of a Christian community,” WOG co-founder
Steve Clark once wrote in Knowing God's Will, “and
until we are, we will not experience guidance with
the sureness that the Lord has for us.”
‘Thomas J. Nash is ay cyyard-winning journalist, who received a
me > nw ‘Missouri school of
But at their December 1990 meeting, WOG lead-
ers noted that their own wills and designs had sup-
planted the Lord's in many ways since the commu-
nity was founded in September 1970. They repented
for fostering elitism, selective membership, secrecy,
culture by at, social engineering, abusing pastoral
authority, unhealthful models of marriage and fam-
ily, the degradation of women, an enormous pres-
sure to conform, and a “statement of commitment,”
in which members pledged “our loyalty to all those
who fight with us.” The pledge, which many WOG
members took at the end of the Training Course, an
intensive learning program implemented in the early
1980s, continued in increasingly militaristic tones:
2. We are ready for every sacrifice, even death, ithe
Lord honors us by calling us to die for him or our
brothers.
8. We are ready to serve until the Lord indicates
that the war has been won.
4, We will be loyal to cur commanders, knowing
that they are committed to defend and provide for
cour homes and families. We will serve where they
direct us and in the way they direct us.
5. We will keep our plans and movements hidden
from the enemy and his agents.
The list of sins aired at the December 1990
meeting sounded more like something a repentant
cult leader might confess, not men “who have been
given position and authority by the Lord,” as Clark.
once described himself and his colleagues.
“We feel that this combination of factors. . .
really added up to an abuse of authority,” said WOG
leader Ken Wilson, commenting on the enormous
pressure to conform in the community, which the
‘Training Course instensified. “Each of those were
powerful influences in themselves. Taken together,
they provided a kind of momentum that was diff!
Fidelity (June, 1991)ad
cult even for very strong-willed, ‘I-think-my-own-
thoughts’ people to counterbalance effectively.”
“Do you hear what I'm saying,” said an emo-
tional Wilson, raising his voice to summarize his
thoughts about the Training Course and the abuses
of the community in general. “We were wrong in
supporting this. And we feel that we stand here
before you in need of your forgiveness.”
Ralph Martin, Word of God senior head coordi-
nator and co-founder, concurs. “I think,” he told
Fidelity, “we originally started with a very clear sense
that we weren't supposed to be a church, that we
were supposed to be a renewal group. . . . But we
modeled that we were doing on the New
‘Testament Church, So I think we built in a contra-
diction from the earliest days and attributed too
much of the re-
Even in the Word of God, the mood of repen-
tance is far from unanimous, with about 300 of
1,500 adults splitting to make a new SOS commu-
nity in Ann Arbor. In addition, the Word of God's
actions have led to a split between Ralph Martin
and the communtty's other co-founder, Steve Clark,
‘who fs the most influential man in the Sword of the
Spirit and its Catholic branch, Christ the King Inter-
national.
“T.don't agree with a good part of what Ralph is
saying these days.” sald Clark, who 1s not known for
talking to the media, during interviews with Fidelity.
“Right at the moment, tt looks as if we're head-
ing in different directions,” said Martin of his long-
time friend. “I think the issues here, and their im-
pact on many, many people, are more important
than any one re-
sponsibility of
the Church and
the authority of
lationship. And
I regret that
Steve and my-
the Church to “I think a small group of self find our-
a oe Se people basically took control Sera ara
ee of the whole thing early on. issue, but that’s
small group of - | how it ts.”
people basically [We] took the place of the Lord ame
peg hen tet Himself, in a certain kind of Fe gl
carly on. And I Clark met at the
was a part of
that group,” sald
Martin. And I
way. Instead of trusting in the |
Lord .. . [we] basically got into
protecting our thing, our work, |
University of
Notre Dame in
the early 1960s.
think [we] took Both were
the place of the in a way which led to excessive studying phi-
Lord Himself, in 2 | losophy, Martin
a certain kind of exercises of authority, control- | as an under-
. Instead of ay duate id
Trusting inthe ling people’s lives. ieee eg
Lord and being
docile to the
Clark as a
graduate stu-
dent. And both
Lord, ...[we]ba-
sically got into
protecting our thing, our work, ina way which led to
excessive exercises of authority, controlling people's,
lives.”
“We interpreted {comunity life] in light of Catho-
lic religious orders,” added Martin. “It was an over-
monastic approach to things that I don’t think is
really healthy.”
The WOG's public repentance and reform fol-
lowed what was basically a split from the Sword of
the Spirit (SOS), the international charismatic orga-
nization which’ Martin helped found in the carly
1980s, under the direct Jurisdiction of the SOS,
which had 51 communities in late 1989.
Fidelity (June, 1991)
were interested
in the Cursillo
movement, in which exuberant, external praise of
God is prominent. Both would later serve on the
national secretariat of the Cursillo movement.
Martin and Clark joined forces to bring about
Church renewal, working together at Notre Dame,
at the Newman Center at Michigan State University
in East Lansing, and finally in helping promote the
Catholic Charismatic Renewal, which first made spiri-
tual waves at Duquesne University and then Notre
Dame in 1967. The centerpiece of the Charismatic
Renewal has been and remains the “Baptism of the
Holy Spirit’—a theological misnomer, yet a spiritu-
ally genuine experience in which a participant prays
to receive a greater experience of the Holy Spirit, For
25