Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Core CBG
Special Procedures
Special Prosthesis
Special Drugs
/
Chronic Group
WHO-DAS 2.0
WHO Disability Assessment Schedule General measure of functioning and disability Can be Linked to ICF Classification Can be used
Monitoring treatment outcome in clinical practice Population surveys Effects measurements of Clinical Trial
Three versions:
12 items, 36 items and 12+24 items
Proxy
Third party answer the questions Views from Family Members, Carers or other observers such as nurses or other health workers May be use in INA-CBG if patient cannot response
Self-Administered
Filled-up by individual Use pencil-paper-version
Copyright of United Nations UniversityIIGH
Development of WHO-DAS
First developed by WHO in 1988
To assess functioning mainly for psychiatric patients
Developed further by WHO Collaborating Centre in Groningen, Netherlands Developed to reflect ICF Refinement done by WHO and US Institues
NIH- National Institute of Health NIMH- National Institute of Mental Health NIAAA National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism NIDA National Institute of Drug Abuse
Copyright of United Nations UniversityIIGH
Development of WHO-DAS
Process of Development
Collaborative approach at international level
Ensure applicability in all health settings
Development of WHO-DAS
Process of Development
Reliability and Validity field studies
Cover 4 different groups
General Population Population with Physical Problem Population with Mental or Emotional Problem Population with problems of Drug Abuse and Addiction
36-Item Version
Most detailed version Each item when positively endorsed will be followed by questions on number of days with the disability Three format: interviewer-administered, selfadministered and proxy-administered Average Interview time:20 minute
Copyright of United Nations UniversityIIGH
12-Item Version
brief assessments of overall functioning Use when time constraints explains 81% of the variance of the 36-item version five minutes interviewer-administered, self administered and proxy-administered
Copyright of United Nations UniversityIIGH
12+24-item version
hybrid of the 12-item and 36-item versions Respondents screen for problems in specific domains Based on positive responses to the initial 12 items, respondents may be given up to 24 additional questions administered by interview or computer-adaptive testing (CAT). 20 minutes.
Questionnaire
Four parts
Introduction Section 1: Face sheet Section 2: Demographic and Background Info Section 3: Preamble Section 4: Core Questions
WHO-DAS: Introduction
Brief information on WHO-DAS Reminder that users has to be trained to use WHO-DAS List of different versions of WHO-DAS Contact address of responsible person in WHO
Living situation:
H1-H3
Number of days of disability
S2 S3
None None
Mild Mild
Moderate Moderate
Severe Severe
S4
None
Mild
Moderate
Severe
S5
None
Mild
Moderate
Severe
Extreme or cannot do
None
Mild
Moderate
Severe
S8
S9 S10 S11 S12
None
None None
Mild
Mild Mild
Moderate
Moderate Moderate
Severe
Severe Severe
Extreme or cannot do
Extreme or cannot do Extreme or cannot do Extreme or cannot do Extreme or cannot do
Mild Mild
Moderate Moderate
Severe Severe
Scoring Scheme-WHO-DAS
1 to 5;
None = 1 (Not disable) Extreme/Cannot Do = 5 (Totally Disable)
Minimum Total Score = 12 (No Disability) Maximum Total Score = 60 (12 x 5) (Total Disability)
Flashcard #1
Flashcard #2
Conclusion
Measuring disability is important exercise in health system to support policy decision WHO-DAS 2.0 is a robust, valid and reliable generic disability assessment tool supported by strong research and development WHO-DAS 12-Item version is used in INA-CBG for resource allocation
TERIMA KASIH