1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

United States Constitution. Jurisdiction is sought under both Section 1983 28 U.S.C.A. 1343 and 28 U. S.C.A. 1331. PARTIES 2.Mary Jones is the Plaintiff who was employed in the main operating room basement of the Regents of the University of California UCLA working under severe retaliation where she sustained industrial injury. 3.Edmund G. Brown, Jr., is the Governor of the State of California. 4.Arnold Alois Schwarzenegger is the former Governor of the State of California. 5.Ronnie G. Caplane is on the appeals board of the Workers Compensation Appeals Board (hereafter WCAB) and was appointed chairwoman by Edmund G. Brown, Jr. CAUSE OF ACTION NO. ONE BY PLAINTIFF AGAINST THE DEFENDANTS FOR DEPRIVATION OF HER RIGHTS UNDER THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION ARTICLE VI AND 1ST,4TH, 5TH,6TH,8TH, 14TH AMENDMENTS.(all previous pleading is to be part of this cause as if it is typed herein) 6. The acts complained of in this suit concern Edmund G. Brown, Jr., as the Governor of California has a duty to insure the laws of California and the California Constitution do not violate Plaintiffs United States Constitutional rights. 7. On Apr. 19, 2004, Defendant Schwarzenegger passed Senate Bill (SB) 889 of WCAB reform. This bill has deprived the Plaintiff of her Federal Constitutional rights. 8. Plaintiff seeks damages for this continuing violation from 2003 to current seeking damages for the harm including financial disaster, loss of career, and health as a result of the deprivations from the Regents of
2
VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR DEPRIVATIONS FO RIGHTS UNDER THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION ARTICLE IV AND VI, AMENDMENTS 1ST, 4TH, 5TH, 6TH , 8TH 14TH.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

the University of California (herein after Regents) placement and the WCAB violations. 9. 2003-2005 Plaintiff worked under severe retaliation for whistleblowing against the Regents. January 21, 2005, Plaintiff sustained industrial injury from too little help while circulating on an all-day sex change operation on an infant in operating room #4. Regents refused to allow Plaintiff to leave and seek medical help ordering her to start another surgery for Dr. Bernard Churchill even thought she had worked past her ten hour shift. The Regents was later refused her a doctor, refused her own doctor, refused emergency medical care, had medical care and benefits withdrawn more than once creating an escalating crises of her acute injury and financial disaster. Plaintiff was sent to two physicians who threatened, battered and caused injury at a time she was acutely incapacitated suffering from pain. The Regents and their self-insured claims administrator conspired to change the doctors report trying to get Plaintiff back to work to make a profit and cover up a serious injury. From 2005 they had attempted to cover up Plaintiffs injury of January 21, 2013 and the diagnostic film. April 2006- Plaintiff was declared permanent and stationary by her treating doctor and agreed medical physician but Regents/Sedgwick stopping paying permanent disability according to the agreed medical physicians report of percentage. Nonetheless for the next several years the same was repeated in the agreed physician reports over and over. 2006-2011 Plaintiff repeatedly filing readiness for trial. September 2011- Presiding Judge Hjelle and Hon. Jeffrey Ward both signed the order for Plaintiffs trial to be December 7, 2011.

3
VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR DEPRIVATIONS FO RIGHTS UNDER THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION ARTICLE IV AND VI, AMENDMENTS 1ST, 4TH, 5TH, 6TH , 8TH 14TH.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

December 2011- Sedgwick, CMS, Inc., hired a new law firm to re-do the case after seven years of litigation. The court does not act on motions; they go in a black hole. 2011-present The Regents/Sedgwick new lawyers used Obama as an inflammatory tactic to the very political WCAB court and judge. It did not work with the trial judge but did with Ronnie Caplane in the higher WCAB appeals who is reported to have given donations to the Obama campaign. Plaintiff filed objections to it all and asked for sanction over and over with none. Ronnie Caplane went outside the law and ruled for the Regents to re-do the case and violated the numerous civil rights of Plaintiff inducing due process. All pre-trial matters including exchanging exhibits/witnesses had been completed. Ronnie G. Caplane harmed Plaintiff by deviating from state and federal law and procedure, abusing discretion not once but over and over resulting in cruel and unusual punishment to Plaintiff for the deprivation of her equal protection rights, denial of her fourth amendment rights, her rights to prohibit double jeopardy, her right to due process and the denial of basic law procedure of justice of due process of law, and denying her the right to receive a fundamentally fair, orderly, and just judicial proceeding. 10.The WCAB has denied the Plaintiff her Federal Constitutional right to petition grievance, receive a speedy trial, receive a fundamentally fair, orderly, and just judicial proceeding, receive due process, receive protection under California statutes and the United States Constitutional laws including Article VI and Fifth Amendment due process preventing double jeopardy and cruel and unusual punishment. The Defendants stalked Plaintiff and kept her under surveillance for nine years. When she was at the WCAB court for trial
4
VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR DEPRIVATIONS FO RIGHTS UNDER THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION ARTICLE IV AND VI, AMENDMENTS 1ST, 4TH, 5TH, 6TH , 8TH 14TH.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

they filmed her at the WCAB and when she went to lunch and chase her from Marina Del Rey to Los Angeles in the cars. They filmed her apartment complex. They hide videos and then after exhibits were exchanged they wanted to submit it. The WCAB denied Plaintiff payment of permanent disability of which was reported in repetitive reports of the agreed physicians report causing Plaintiff to be dependent upon the federal and state government for income, live in poverty, failure to bring the case to trial when Plaintiff has filed in the WCAB courts on-going readiness. Beginning in 2005 when the Regents started withdrawing benefits the Plaintiff has been forced to live in poverty seeking assistance from the state and federal government. 11. Plaintiff seeks remedy for her harm under the unconstitutional provisions of the California WCAB law including: 1. The WCAB denies payment of permanent disability if the plaintiff dies before judgment. 2. Unlimited appeals to the San Franciscan WCAB higher Appeals Board. 3. Appointment of the WCAB appeals board does not have to be a lawyer. 4. Appointment of the WCAB appeals board does not have to have workers compensation experience as an attorney prior to hire. 5. Appointments are political as opposed to qualifications as in this case Ronnie Caplane gives money to President Obamas campaign which in this case contributed to Plaintiff being deprived of justice and her rights. CAUSE OF ACTION NO. TWO IS DAMAGE BY PLAINTIFF AGAINST THE DEFENDANT EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., FOR DEPIVING THE PLAINTIFF OF HER UNITED STATES CONSTITUTINOAL ARTICLE IV SECTION IV, RIGHT TO A REPUBLICAN GOVERNMENT. (all previous pleading is to be part of this cause as if it is typed herein)
5
VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR DEPRIVATIONS FO RIGHTS UNDER THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION ARTICLE IV AND VI, AMENDMENTS 1ST, 4TH, 5TH, 6TH , 8TH 14TH.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

11. The false placement of the Regents as being an arm of the state by the California Constitution deprived the Plaintiff of her Article VI rights and caused harm to her as a proximate result of her Constitutional rights being deprived and violated. The provisions for state board members for the Regents in the California Constitution deprive the civil rights of the Plaintiff. The Regents have gone from their inception of purpose to provide those in California with a higher education to player in Wall Streets casino economy. It is reported the Regents had fifty-three Billion dollars on the stock market. The Regents are mostly multi-millionaires including government and prior government officials who are into investing and government power not education. It allows these people to have inside information for inside trading. The Regents are not owned by people. It is a corporation who has State of California officials on its Board but is totally independent in its operation. The Regents have the benefits of the private and the public facility violating Plaintiffs rights and enable them to cause her harm. The Regents refuse to report to the pubic how much money they spend on legal defense. They use their unconstitutional power to manipulate case law. 12. The University of California hired former Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano as its next president and was looking at investing upward to six million to renovate the mansion she is to stay in. This money does buy a lot. But to mix private with public is to violate the Plaintiffs civil rights and allows the Regents to be treated unconstitutionally and deprives Plaintiff of her 14th amendment right to equal protection. Wealthy, politically powerful men are fixtures on the Regent's investment committee, including Richard C. Blum (Wall Streeter, war contractor, and husband of U.S. Senator Dianne
6
VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR DEPRIVATIONS FO RIGHTS UNDER THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION ARTICLE IV AND VI, AMENDMENTS 1ST, 4TH, 5TH, 6TH , 8TH 14TH.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Feinstein), and Paul Wachter (Gov. Arnold Schwarzeneggers long-time business partner and financial advisor). There are conflicts of interest inside this committee as it moves billions of dollars between public and private companies and investment banks. Legal firms including the one Sedgwick hired to re-do Plaintiffs WCAB injury gets rich off the courts unconstitutional deference to the Regents in the courts while depriving Plaintiffs civil rights. 13.The UC Board of Regents is a 26-member board with 18 of those members nominated by the governor in violation of the Plaintiffs rights. The California Constitution provides for the Regents of the University of California be an arm of the state and Governor of California is an automatic Board Member of the Regents, with the Governor, Lieutenant Governor, Speaker of the State Assembly, State Superintendent of Public Instruction. This violates and deprives Plaintiff of her Article IV clause IV rights. The Regents have harmed the Plaintiff on-going since 2003 to current. 14. The Regents have harmed the Plaintiff when she worked down in the basement of surgery under severe retaliation while she was circulating for a patient and a room full of surgical staff. When she needed help she reported unsafe acts to the President, wrote emails to two different Medical Directors and Chancellors and others without intervention culminating in industrial injury. In court, the Regents were protection by saying she had not filed with the DFEH in 2003 when their receipt of records show she had but whistleblower was struck; and their unconstitutional requirements. For the last several decades the courts of California have covered for the Regents in their cases going outside the Constitution and justice. This is the power of the Regents. And, in Plaintiffs trial, unknown to her the foreman was a
7
VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR DEPRIVATIONS FO RIGHTS UNDER THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION ARTICLE IV AND VI, AMENDMENTS 1ST, 4TH, 5TH, 6TH , 8TH 14TH.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

family of power influence for the Regents. And with the Regents contracting with Fidility/Sedgwick and other entities there is a form of antitrust in the State of California which violates the rights of Plaintiff. The Regents with their Unconstitutional placement above deprives Plaintiff of her civil rights. It creates a form of oligarchy instead of a republican government. California is now a state controlled by the hands of a few people of the Regents, Wall Street and the State instead of by the People. 15. The Regents own numerous universities, hospitals and other facilities all over California with lots of employees. This huge entity has been providing a secondary far reaching unconstitutional power to the State of California. It acts as a type of secondary train track in the background of the state providing power, selectively pursued court cases, huge money revenues all the while it is intermingling between state officials and private power brokers. This prohibits the Plaintiff and the people of California their Article IV rights to a republican government and it has caused harm to the Plaintiff. The Regents does not provide their employees state benefits. The Regents placement by the California Constitution creates a threat of sovereignty to the United States of America. PRAYER Plaintiff prayers for the following relief. 1) Find remedy for Plaintiff on all counts. 2) Trial by jury on all issues so triable. 3) Damages to the Plaintiff in the amount of three hundred million dollars. 4) Compensatory damages.
8
VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR DEPRIVATIONS FO RIGHTS UNDER THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION ARTICLE IV AND VI, AMENDMENTS 1ST, 4TH, 5TH, 6TH , 8TH 14TH.