Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Reinforcedslab 100917010457 Phpapp02
Reinforcedslab 100917010457 Phpapp02
Reinforced concrete slabs are used in floors, roofs and walls of buildings and as the decks of bridges. The floor system of a structure can take many forms such as in situ solid slab, ribbed slab or pre-cast units. Slabs may span in one direction or in two directions and they may be supported on monolithic concrete beam, steel beams, walls or directly by the structures columns. Continuous slab should in principle be designed to withstand the most unfavorable arrangements of loads, in the same manner as beams. ecause there are greater opportunities for redistribution of loads in slabs, analysis may however often be simplified by the use of a single load case. ending moment coefficient based on this simplified method are provided for slabs which span in one direction with appro!imately e"ual spans, and also for flat slabs. The moments in slabs spanning in two directions can also be determined using coefficients tabulated in the code of practice, S #$$%. Slab which are not rectangular in plan or which support an irregular loading arrangement may be analy&ed by techni"ues such as the yield line method or the 'elliborg strip method. Concrete slab behave primarily as fle!ural members and the design is similar to that for beams, although in general it is somewhat simpler because( $. the breadth of the slab is already fi!ed and a unit breadth of $m is used in the calculations, ). the shear stress are usually low in a slab e!cept when there are heavy concentrated loads, and *. compression reinforcement is seldom re"uired.
3.2
$. ).
LEARNING OUTCOMES
know the re"uirement for reinforced concrete slab design design reinforced concrete slab
BPLK
--
DCB 3223
3.3
TYPES OF SLABS
Type of slab used in construction sectors are, Solid slab .lat slab Ribbed slab /affle slab 'ollow block floor0slab
BPLK
-3
DCB 3223
.lat slab floor is a reinforced concrete slab supported directly by concrete columns without the use of intermediary beams. The slab may be of constant thickness throughout or in the area of the column it may be thickened as a drop panel. The column may also be of constant section or it may be flared to form a column head or capital. These various form of construction are illustrated in .igure *.).
BPLK
-#
DCB 3223
.igure *.), 4rop panels and column head. The drop panels are effective in reducing the shearing stresses where the column is liable to punch through the slab, and they also provide an increased moment of resistance where the negative moments are greatest. The flat slab floor has many advantages over the beam and slab floor. The simplified formwork and the reduced storey heights make it more economical. /indows can e!tend up to the underside of the slab, and there are no beams to obstruct the light and he circulation of air. The absence of sharp corner gives greater fire resistance as there is less danger of the concrete spalling an e!posing the reinforcement. 4eflection re"uirements will generally govern slab thickness which should not be less than $)5 mm. Typical ribbed and waffle slab are shown in .igure *.$61c2, 1d27. Ribbed slabs, which are two-way spanning and are constructed with ribs in both direction of span. Ribbed slab floors are formed using temporary or permanent shuttering system while the hollow block floor is generally constructed with block made of clay tile or with concrete containing a light-weight aggregate. 8f the block are suitably manufactured and have an ade"uate strength they can be considered to contribute to the strength of the slab in the design calculations, but in many designs no such allowance is made. The principal advantage of these floors is the reduction in weight achieved by removing part of the concrete below the neutral a!is and, in the case of the hollow block floor, replacing it with a lighter form of construction. Ribbed and hollow block floors are economical for buildings where there are long spans, over about 5 m, and light or moderate live loads, such as in hospital wards or apartment buildings. They would not be suitable for structures having a heavy loading, such as warehouses and garages. 9ear to the supports the hollow blocks are stopped off and the slab is made solid. This is done to achieve greater shear strength, and if the slab is supported by a monolithic concrete beam the solid section acts as the flange of a T-section. The ribs should be checked for shear at their :unction with the solid slab. 8t is good practice to stagger the :oints of the hollow blocks in ad:acent rows so that, as they are stopped off, there is no abrupt change in cross-section e!tending across the slab. The slabs are usually made solid under partitions and concentrated loads. 4uring construction the hollow tiles should be well soaked in water prior to placing the concrete, otherwise shrinkage cracking of the top
BPLK -; DCB 3223
3.4
SIMPLIFIED ANALYSIS
S #$$% permit the use of simplified load arrangement for all slabs of ma!imum ultimate design load throughout all spans or panels provided that the following condition are met( a2 in one-way slab, the area of each bay < *% m) b2 =ive load, >k ? $.)5 4ead load, @k c2 =ive load, >k ? 5 k90m) e!cluding partitions. 8f analysis is based on this singled load case, all support moments 1e!cept at a cantilever2 should be reduced by )% per cent and span moments increased accordingly. 9o further redistribution is then permitted, but special attention must be given to cases where a span or panel is ad:acent to a cantilever of significant length. 8n this situation the condition where the cantilever is fully loaded and the span unloaded must be e!amined to determine possible hogging moments in the span. To determine the value of bending moment coefficient and shear forces coefficient, therefore very important to define the condition of panel type, location and moment considered. Refer to S #$$%, Aart $, $;;3, Cl *.5.*.- and *.5.*.3 and also Table *.$B and Table *.$5 for more information.
panel
bay
3.5
BPLK
a2 Ene-way slab
lx
Beam AB and CD w = n lx / 2
ly
b2 Two-way slab
A E F B
lx
ly
lx/2
450 lx
Beam AC and BD
450 lx
Beam AB and CD w = n lx / 6 {3- (lx / ly)2}
w = n lx / 3
BPLK
3$
DCB 3223
3.6
SHEAR IN SLAB
The shear resistance of slab may be calculated by the procedures given in S #$$%, Cl.*.5.5.). F!perimental works has indicated that, compared wit beams, shallow slab fail at slightly higher shear stresses and this is incorporated into the values of design ultimate shear stress vc.1Refer to Table *.;, S #$$%2. The shear stress at a section in a solid slab is given by( v= V b.d
where V is the shear force due to ultimate load, d is the effective depth of the slab and b is the width of section considered 1Refer to Table *.$3 and Cl. *.5.5.)2. Calculation is usually based on strip of slab $m wide. The S #$$% re"uires that for solid slab( $. v C %.# G fcu or 5 90mm) ). v C vc for a slab thickness less than )%% mm *. if v H vc , shear reinforcement must be provided in slabs more than )%% mm thick. 8f shear reinforcement is re"uired, then nominal steel, as for beams, should be provided when v C 1vc I o.B2 and Jdesigned reinforcement provided for higher values of v. Since shear stress in slab due to distributed loads are generally small, shear reinforcement will seldom be re"uired for such loads may, however, cause more critical conditions as shown in the following sections. Aractical difficulties concerned with bending and fi!ing of shear reinforcement lead to the recommendation that it should not be used in slabs which are less than )%% mm deep.
Check should also be undertaken to ensure that the stress v calculated for the perimeter at the face of the loaded area is less than smaller of %.# G fcu or 5 90mm).
3.7
BPLK
3*
DCB 3223
a service stress of *%3 90mm2 would be used when fy is B-% 90mm). 'owever, if a more accurate assessment of the limiting span-depth ratio is re"uired the service stress fs, can be calculated from( fs = 2 x fy x Asreq x 1 3 x Asprov b where Asreq Asprov b K the area of reinforcement at mid-span K the area of reinforcement provided at mid-span K the ratio of the mid-span moments after and before any redistribution.
3.
REINFORCEMENT DETAIL
To resist cracking of the concrete, codes of practice specify detail such as the minimum area of reinforcement re"uired in a section and limits to the ma!imum and minimum spacing of bars. Some of these rules are as follows( a2 Minimum areas of reinforcement Minimum area K 0.13bh / 100 or K 0.24bh / 100 for mild steel for high yield steel
BPLK
3B
DCB 3223
in both directions.
b2 Ma!imum Spacing of Reinforcement The ma!imum clear spacing given in Table *.*%, and Clause *.$).$$, S #$$%, 1apply to bars in beams when a ma!imum likely crack width of %.* mm is acceptable an the cover to reinforcement does not e!ceed 5% mm2, and are similar to beams e!cept that for thin slabs, or if the tensile steel percentage is small, spacing may be increased from those given in Table *.*%, S #$$% to a ma!imum of the lesser of *d or 35% mm. c2 Reinforcement in the flange of a T N or =- eam /hen the slab from the flange of a T or = beam the area of reinforcement in the flange and at right angles to the beam should not be less than %.$5 percent of the longitudinal cross-section of the flange. d2 Curtailment and anchorage of reinforcement +t a simply supported end the bars should be anchored as specified in .igure *.3.
3.!
SLAB DESIGN
3.!.1 SOLID SLABS SPANNING IN ONE DIRECTION
The slabs are design as if they consist of a series of beams of $ m breadth. The main steel is in the direction of the span and secondary or distribution steel re"uired in the transverse direction. The main steel should from the outer layer of reinforcement to give it the ma!imum level arm. The calculations for bending reinforcement follow a similar procedure to that used in beam design. The lever-arm curve of .igure *.# is used to determine the lever arm 1z2 and the area of tension reinforcement is then
BPLK
35
DCB 3223
given by( As =
!
/ 0."# fy.z
.or solid slabs spanning one way the simplified rules for curtailing bars as shown in .igure *.; may be used provided the loads are substantially uniformly distributed. /ith a continuous slab it is also necessary that the spans are appro!imately e"ual the simplified single load case analysis has been used.
The % values on the K axis mar the limit !or sin"ly rein!or#ed se#tions $ith moment redistribution applied%
BPLK
3-
DCB 3223
.igure *.;, Simplified rules for curtailment of bars in slab spanning in one direction 3.!.1.1 S"#$%& S'$$()*+, S(%", S%-. The effective span of the slab is taken as the lesser of, a2 The centre-to-centre distance of the bearings, or b2 The clear distance between supports plus the effective depth of the slab The basic span-effective depth ratio for this type of slab is )%,$ 1Refer to Table *.$% and Cl. *.B.-.* in S #$$%2.
E/-#$%+ 3.1: The slab is to be design to carry a live load *.% k90mm), plus floor finishes and ceiling load of $.% k90mm). The characteristic materials strength are fc! K *% 90mm), fy K B-% 90mm). =ength of slab is B.5 m
S(%'*"(0 : Minimum effective depth, d 1m.f2 K B5%% 0 )% m.f K ))5 0 m.f K span 0 )% ! modification factor
BPLK
33
DCB 3223
For high-yield reinforcement slab$ Fstimating the modification factor to be of the order of $.* for a highly reinforcement slab. Try effective depth d K $#% mm. .or a mild e!posure the cover K )5 mm. +llowing, say, 5 mm as half the diameter of the reinforcing bar overall depth of slab, h = $#% I )5 I 5 K )$% mm self-weight of slab K %.)$ ! )B ! $%* K 5.% k90m) total dead load, %& K $.% I 5.% K -.% k90m 2 .or a $m width of slab ultimate load K 1$.B%& I $.-'&2 1B.52 K 1$.B ! -.% I $.- ! *.%21B.52 K 5;.Bk9 M 1 25!.4 / 4.534 1 33.4 5N#
.rom Table *.$$ S #$$%, for fs K *%3 90mm ) the span-effective depth modification factor K $.);. Therefore( A//o0ab/e spa* / d H Ac,!a/ spa* / d )% ! $.); H B5%% 0 $#% )5.# H )5.%
Thus , 1 1 6 ## "7 -,+8'-*+ . 2( 1e*.-*2 re-*force3e*, 4 = fc!bd2 z K **.B ! $%1$%%%21$#%)21*%2 K %.%*B C %.$5-
= d 50.6 + 7 (0.26 8 4 / 0.9(: K d O%.5 I G 1 %.)5 N %.%*B 0 %.;2P K %.;- d H %.;5 d , so take z K %.;5 d
BPLK
3#
DCB 3223
As
P)(9",+ T16 .-)7 -* 156 ## :+0*)+; A7 = 523 ##24# 3( )hear Shear, V = ; / 2 K 5;.B 0 ) K );.%3 k9 Shear stress, v = V / bd K );.%3 ! $%*0 1$%%% ! $#%2 K %.$- 90mm) C %.# G fcu .rom Table *.;, S #$$%, 100As /b d K $%% ! 5)* 0 $%%% ! $#% K %.); v: 1 6.51 N4##2 ; v < v )+8'")+,.
:
v K %.$- C C v c0) D ok( therefore( anchorage length H *% mm or end bearing 1support width20* end bearing K )*% mm Therefore( -0:=()-?+ %+0?*= 1 236 4 3 1 77 ## @ 36 ## D beyond the centre line of the support.
.rom Table *.)3 S #$$%, fy K B-% 90mm) +rea of transverse high-yield reinforcement, As 3-* = 0.13bh/100 K %.$* ! $%%% ! )$% 0$%% K )3* mm ) 0m P)(9",+ T16 -* 256 ## :+0*)+; ?( @rac&-*2 chec& The bar spacing does not e!ceed 35% mm or * d and the minimum reinforcement is less than %.*Q. 1Refer Cl. *.$).$$.).3 and Table *.*%, S #$$%2. +llowable clear spacing of bars K * d K *1$#%2 K 5B% mm A:*'-% :%+-) 7$-:"0? 1 256 A 16 1 246 ## < 3 d B (5 3.!.1.2 C(0*"0'('7 S(%", S%-. .or a continuous slab, bottom reinforcement is re"uired within the span and top reinforcement over the supports. The effective span is the distance between the centre lines of supports. The basic span-effective depth ratio is )-,$ 1Refer to Table *.$% and Cl *.B.-.*2. 8f the simplified load arrangement for all slabs of ma!imum ultimate design load throughout all spans or panels provided that the following condition are met for the single load case analysis, bending moment an shear forces coefficients as shown in Table *.$*, S #$$% may be used. E/-#$%+ 3.2 : The four-span slab shown in .igure *.$$ support a live load %f *.% k90mm), plus floor finishes and ceiling load of $.% k90mm). The characteristic materials strength are fc! K *% 90mm), fy K B-% 90mm). 1 314 ##24#; *($ %-&+)
BPLK
#%
DCB 3223
.igure *.$$ Continuous slab - e!ample S(%'*"(0 : .rom Table *.$%, S #$$%, basic span- effective depth ratio K )So depth, d K Span 0 )- K B5%% 0 )K $3* mm Try effective depth, d = 176 ##. +ssume a mild e!posure, cover, c K )% mm an diameter of bar, R K $% mm h = d + cover + A/2 = $3% I )% I 5 K $;5 mm, so taken h 1 266 ## Self-weight of slab K %.) ! )B K B.# k90m2 Total dead load, %& K $.% I B.# K 5.# k9 0 m2 .or $ meter width of slab( Sltimate loadB C = (1.42& + 1.?q& ( 4.6 K 1$.B ! 5.# I $.- ! *.%21B.52 F 1 5 .14 5N $+) #+*)+ C",*= 1( 1e*.-*2 (Defer ,o @E 3.6.2.3B 1) "110( )ince the bay si&e H *%m ), the spans are e"ual and "k C $.)5 gk the moment coefficients shown in Table *.$* s #$$% may be used. Thus, assuming that the end support is simply supported, from Table *.$* for the first span, = 0.0"?CE K 1%.%#- ! 5#.$B 21B.52 K )).5 k9m 4 = fc!bd z
2
K %.%)- C %.$5-
= d 50.6 + 7(0.26 8 4/0.9(: K d O%.5 I G1%.)5 N %.%)- 0 %.;2P K %.;3 d H %.;5 d , so take z K %.;5 d
As
BPLK
K *B# mm)0 m P)(9",+ T16 .-)7 -* 266 ## :+0*)+; 2( )pa*+effec,-ve .ep,h ra,-o bd
2 s
= 3!3 ##24#
.rom Table *.$$ S #$$%, for fs K ))# 90mm ) the span-effective depth modification factor K $.-#. Therefore( A//o0ab/e spa* / d )- ! $.-# B*.-# H Ac,!a/ spa* / d H B5%% 0 $3% H )-.5 D ok
T='7 d 1 176 ## "7 -,+8'-*+. Similar calculation for the support and the interior span give the steel areas shown in .igure *.$). 3( =-s,r-b!,-o* / >ra*sverse ),ee/ .rom Table *.)3 S #$$%, fy K B-% 90mm) +rea of transverse high-yield reinforcement, As 3-* = 0.13bh/100 K %.$* ! $%%% ! )%% 0$%% K )-% mm ) 0m P)(9",+ T16 -* 366 ## :+0*)+; .(**(# %-&+) 4( )hear (Defer >ab/e 3.13 1) "110( Shear, V = 0.? C K %.- 15#.$B2 K *B.; k9 Shear stress, v = V / bd K *B.; ! $%*0 1$%%% ! $3%2 K %.)$ 90mm) C %.# G fcu .rom Table *.;, S #$$%, 100As / bd K $%% ! *;* 0 $%%% ! $3% K %.)* So, v c K %.B3 ! 1*%0)52$0* K %.5% 90mm) , v < v : ; 7( 0( 7=+-) )+"0>():+#+0* "7 )+8'")+,.
s
BPLK
#)
DCB 3223
6( @rac&-*2 chec& The bar spacing does not e!ceed 35% mm or *d and the minimum reinforcement is less than %.*Q. 1Refer Cl. *.$).$$.).3 and Table *.)3 S #$$%2. +llowable clear spacing of bars K * . K *1$3%2 K 5$% mm A:*'-% :%+-) 7$-:"0? 1 366 A 16 1 2!6 ## < 3 d B (5
The span-effective depth ratios are based on the shorter span and the percentage of reinforcement in that direction. /ith a uniformly distributed load the loads on the supporting beams may generally be apportioned as shown in .igure *.$*.
3.!.2.1 S"#$%& S'$$()*+, S%-. S$-00"0? I0 TC( D")+:*"(07 + slab simply supported on its four sides will deflect about both a!es under load and the corners will tend to lift and curl up from the supports, causing torsion moments. /hen no provision has been made to prevent this lifting or to resist the torsion then the moment coefficients of Table *.$B, S #$$% may be used and the ma!imum moments are given by e"uation $B and $5 in S #$$%( 3sx = Fsx *lx2 in direction of span lT and 3 s y K sy nlx2 in direction of span ly where ms! and 3sy are the moments at mid-span on strips of unit width with spans l! and respectively, and * = 1$.B@k I $.->k2, that is, the total ultimate load per unit area ly K the length of the longer side l! K the length of the shorter side The area of reinforcement in directions l! and ly respectively are( +s! and +sy K 3 s y 0 %.#3fy& per metre width K 3 s x 0 %.#3fy& per metre width
The slab should be reinforced uniformly across the full width, in each direction. The effective depth d used in calculating Asy should be less than that for Asx because of the different depths of the two layers of reinforcement. +t least B% per cent of the mid-span reinforcement should e!tend to the supports and the remaining -% per cent should e!tend to within %. &lx, or %.&ly of the appropriate support. E/-#$%+ 3.3 : 4esign the reinforcement for a simply supported slab )%% mm thick and spanning in two directions. The effective span in each direction is B.5 m and -.* m and the slab supports a live load of $% k90m). The characteristic material strengths are fc! K *% 90mm) and fy K B-% 90mm). S(%'*"(0 : ly 0 lG K -.*0B.5 K $.B C ) D Two way slab .rom Table *.$B, Fs! K %.%;; and Fsy = %.%5$.
BPLK
#5
DCB 3223
Self-weight of slab K %.) ! )B ! $% * K B.# k90m2 Sltimate load, * = $.B@k I $.->k * K 1$.B ! B.#2 I 1$.- !$%2 K )).3)k90m ) 1 22.72 5N4#4# C",*= S=()* S$-0 1( 1e*.-*2 .rom Table *.B, S #$$%, mild e!posure conditions, cover, c K )5 mm. +ssume A bar K $%mm. dx 3sx = h 8 c + A 0 2 K )%% N )5 N 5 K $3% mm. K Fs! nlx2 K %.%;;1)).3)21B.52 ) K B5.5 k9.m0m 4 = fc!bd z
2
K %.%5) C %.$5-
= d 5 0.6 + 7 (0.26 8 4/0.9(: K d O %.5 I G 1%.)5 N %.%5)0%.;2P K %.;B d C %.;5 d , so take z K %.;B d
Asx
Checking As3-*, from Table *.)3 S #$$%B fy K B-% 90mm) As3-* = 0.13bh 0 $%% K %.$*1$%%% ! )%%2 0 $%% K )-% mm)0 m Asx H As3-* D ok P)(9",+ T16 .-)7 -* 166 ## :+0*)+; 2( =ef/ec,-o* @hec&-*2 bd
2 s
= 7 6 ##24#
.rom Table *.$$ S #$$%, for fs K ))$ 90mm ) the span-effective depth modification factor K $.B$. Therefore( A//o0ab/e spa* / d H Ac,!a/ spa* / d )% ! $.B$ H B5%% 0 $3% 2 .2
BPLK #-
E 26.5 B (5
DCB 3223
Shear stress, v = V / bd K 5$.$) ! $%*0 1$%%% ! $3%2 K %.* 90mm) C %.# G fcu .rom Table *.;, S #$$%, 100As 0 bd K $%% ! 3#- 0 $%%% ! $3% K %.BSo, v c K %.-* ! 1*%0)52$0* K %.-3 90mm) , v < v : ; 7( 0( 7=+-) )+"0>():+#+0* "7 )+8'")+,. L(0? S$-0 1( 1e*.-*2 .rom Table *.B S #$$%, mild e!posure conditions, cover, c K )5 mm. +ssume A bar K $%mm. dy 3sy = h 8 c + A/ ) K )%% N )5 -$% N 5 K $-% mm. K synlx2 K %.%5$1)).3)21B.52 ) K )*.5 k9m0m 4 = fc!bd z
2
K %.%*$ C %.$5-
= d 5 0.6 + 7 (0.26 8 4 0 0.9(: K d O %.5 I G 1%.)5 N %.%*$0%.;2P K %.;- d H %.;5 d , so take & K %.;5 d
Asy
Checking As3-*, from Table *.)3 S #$$%, fy K B-% 90mm) As3-* = 0.13bh 0 100 K %.$*1$%%% ! )%%2 0 $%% K )-% mm)0 m H As3-* D ok
s
Asx
= 3!3 ##24#
BPLK
#3
DCB 3223
2( @hec&-*2 for >ra*sverse ),ee/ .rom Table *.)3, fy K B-% 90mm) 100As / bh K $%% 1*;*2 0 $%%% ! )%% 6.1! E 6.13 2
smin
3 B (5
3.!.2.2 R+7*)-"0+, S%-. S$-00"0? I0 TC( D")+:*"(07 /hen the slabs have fi!ity at the supports and reinforcement is added to resist torsion and to prevent the corners of the slab from lifting then the ma!imum moments per unit width are given by( 3sG = sG*lG) in direction of span lx and 3sy = sy*lG2 in direction of span ly where sG and Sy are the moment coefficients given in Table *.$5 of S #$$% for the specified end conditions, and * = (1.4%&+ 1.?'&(, the total ultimate load per unit area. The slab is divided into middle and edge strips as shown in .igure *.$5 and reinforcement is re"uired in the middle strips to resist 3sx and 3 sy, 8n the edge strips only nominal reinforcement is necessary, such that 100As/bh K %.$* for high-yield steel or %.)B for mild steel. 8n addition, torsion reinforcement is provided at discontinuous corners and it should( $. consist of top and bottom mats, each having bars in both directions of span. 2% e!tend from the edges a minimum distance lx 0 5 *. at a corner where the slab is discontinuous in both directions have an area of steel in each of the four layers e"ual to three-"uarters of the area re"uired for the ma!imum mid-span moment B. at a corner where the slab is discontinuous in one direction only, have an area of torsion reinforcement only half of that specified in rule *. Torsion reinforcement is not, however, necessary at any corner where the slab continuous in both directions. /here ly 0Ix H ), the slabs should be designed as spanning in one direction only. Shear force coefficients are also given in S #$$% for cases where torsion corner reinforcement is provided, and these are based on a simplified distribution of load to supporting beams which may be used in preference to the distribution shown .igure *.$*.
BPLK
##
DCB 3223
E/-#$%+ 3.4 : The panel considered is an interior panel, as shown in .igure *.$-. The effective span in each direction is 5 m and - m and the slab supports a live load of $.5 k90m). @iven fcu K *% 90mm)B fy K )5% 90mm) and slab thickness $5% mm. 4esign the reinforcement for a continuous slab.
a
lx '5m
d
ly ' (m
S(%'*"(0 : ly 0 lG K - 0 5 K $.) C ) D Two way slab Self-weight of slab K %.$5 ! )B ! $% * K *.-% k90m2 )% mm asphalt 5% mm insulting screed
BPLK #;
* K $.B!5.%B I $.-!$.5 K ;.5 k90m ) 1 !.5 5N4#4# C",*= .rom Table *.$5, Case $ applies( I ve moment at mid span 3sx K %.%*)1;.52152& K 3.- k9m 3sy K %.%)B 1;.52152 K 5.3 k9m - ve moment at support 1cont2 a long + U C4, 3sx K %.%B) 1;.52152) K $%.) k9.m C, 3sx K %.%*) 1;.52152) K 3.- k9.m a long +4 U
= d 5 0.6 + 7 (0.26 8 4/0.9(: K d O %.5 I G 1%.)5 N %.%$#0%.;2P K %.;# d H %.;5 d , so take & K %.;5 d
Asy
Checking +smin, from Table *.)3 S #$$%, fy K )5% 90mm) As3-* = 0.24bh / 100 K %.)B1$%%% ! $5%2 0 $%% K *-% mm)0 m
BPLK ;% DCB 3223
Asx I As3-* D so use As3-* P)(9",+ R16 .-)7 -* 266 ## :+0*)+; A7 = 3!3 ##24#
K %.%)B C %.$5-
= d 5 0.6 + 7 (0.26 8 4/0.9(: K d O%.5 I G 1%.)5 N %.%)B0%.;2P K %.;3 d H %.;5 d , so take & K %.;5 d
Asx
Checking As3-*B from Table *.)3 S #$$%B fy K )5% 90mm) As3-* = 0.24bh / 100 K %.)B1$%%% ! $5%2 0 $%% K *-% mm)0m Asx H As3-* D ok P)(9",+ R16 .-)7 -* 175 ## :+0*)+; Long !"an# ly 1( A, -.+)pa*B 3sy ' 5.3 k9m 4 = fc!bd zy
2 s
= 44! ##24 #
= d 50.6 + 7(0.26 8 4/0.9(: K d O%.5 I G1%.)5 N %.%$-0%.;2P K %.;# d H %.;5 d , so take & K %.;5 d
Asy
Checking As3-*B from Table *.)3 S #$$%, fy K )5% 90mm) As3-* = 0.24bh / 100 K %.)B1$%%% ! $5%2 0 $%% K *-% mm)0 m Asy I As3-* D so use As3-*
BPLK ;$ DCB 3223
P)(9",+ R16 .-)7 -* 266 ## :+0*)+; 2( A, )!ppor,B 3sy ' 3.- k9m 4 = fc!bd zy
2
s"rov
= 3!3 ##24#
= d 5 0.6 + 7 (0.26 8 4/0.9(: K d O %.5 I G 1%.)5 N %.%)0%.;2P K %.;# d H %.;5 d , so take & K %.;5d
Asy
Checking As3-*B fro3 Table *.)3 S #$$%B fy K )5% 90mm) As3-* = 0.24bh / 100 K %.)B1$%%% ! $5%2 0 $%% K *-% mm)0m Asy I As3-* J so use As3-* P)(9",+ R16 .-)7 -* 266 ## :+0*)+;
s"rov
= 3!3 ##24 #
DTorsion reinforcement is not necessary because the slab is interior panel. DFdge strip, provide +smin 1R$% -)%%mm c0c2. )hear @hec&-*2 (@r-,-ca/ a, )!ppor,( 9ormally shear reinforcement should not be used in slabs C )%% mm deep. .rom Table *.$-, vx K %.*;B vy K %.** Vvx Vvx = vx.*.lx K %.*;1;.52152 K $#.5 k90m width = vy.*.lx K %.**1;.52152 K $5.3 k90m width Shear stress, v K V3ax / bd K $#.5 ! $%* 0 1$%%% ! $)%2 K %.$5 90mm) C %.# G fc! .rom Table *.;, S #$$%,
BPLK ;) DCB 3223
100As / bd K $%% ! BB; 0 $%%% ! $)% K %.*3B So, v c K %.- ! 1*%0)52$0* K %.-B 90mm) , v < v : ; 7( 0( 7=+-) )+"0>():+#+0* "7 )+8'")+,. =ef/ec,-o* @hec&-*2 (@r-,-ca/ a, bd
2
-+spa*(B
sx
= #.? &N.3
.rom Table *.$$ S #$$%, for fs K $*; 90mm ) the span-effective depth modification factor K ).%. Therefore( A//o0ab/e spa* / d H Ac,!a/ spa* / d )- ! ) H B5%% 0 $)% 52 E 37.5 B (5 @rac&-*2 @hec&-*2 (@/ 3.12.11.2.#( The bar spacing does not e!ceed 35% mm or * d and the minimum reinforcement is less than %.*Q. 1Refer Cl. *.$).$$.).3 and Table *.)3 S #$$%2. +llowable clear spacing of bars K *d K *1$)%2 K *-% mm +ctual clear spacing K )%% N $% K $;% mm C * d B (5 h K $5% mm C )5% mm 1for @rade *%2 Dtherefore no further checks are re"uired.
3.11 SUMMARY
8n this unit we have studied method for reinforced concrete slab design. Summary of reinforced concrete slab design are shown in .igure *.$3 below.
4ecide concrete grade, concrete cover, fire resistance and durability
Fstimate slab thickness for continuous, E/d K *% or for simply supported, E/d K )B, where E is shorter span of the slab.
Structural analysis using Table *.$5 and *.$-, S #$$%, Aart $, $;#5 BPLK ;* DCB 3223
Reinforcement deign
Check shear
3.12 REFERENCES
$. ). *. /.'.Mosley, V.'. ungery U R. 'usle 1$;;;2, De-*force. @o*cre,e =es-2* 15th Fdition2 , Aalgrave. Reinforced Concrete Modul, 1$st Fdition2. SSM. S #$$%, Aart $, $;#5, The Structural Sse of Concrete. Code of Aractice for 4esign and Construction.
BPLK
;B
DCB 3223